Re: [gentoo-ppc-user] USB mouse; IN from bad port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark M. Hart wrote: Hi folks, I have two problems. Hi Mark, 1) I have a beige desktop Power Macintosh G3 (old-world) with first-edition roms. Gentoo installs great, Only thing is, I have an ADB mouse and a USB mouse. The ADB mouse works great, but I can?t figure out how to use the USB mouse. It is recognized during boot-up, and it shows a driver, but I can?t find anything in /dev that corresponds. I have udev enabled in the kernel, and listed as a module; udev shows up at boot-time in the kernel but fails as a module. Could that be part of my problem? Make sure that you have HID Input support in your kernel, otherwise, there won't be a driver for the mouse. If you intend on hotplugging the mouse, make sure you have hotplug installed as well. Once you have HID Input support and hotplug, plugging in the mouse should result in an extra /dev/input/mouseX device. If you don't want to have to select between the two, you can specify /dev/input/mice as your input device which should take input from all mouse devices. 2) Dmesg gives me a lot of IN from bad port 61 at c01b6488, and also IN from bad port 1058 at c0214430. Any idea what this is? Take a look at this for the IN from bad port message: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-ppc-faq.xml#infrombadport Good luck, - -Joe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEVWcowGq7BLLARfoRApGdAJsHa7Ta6lzEYjzYezg0zS3IzfsDswCgsUue hYXPvzdqPD8jhHZbBq3s6tg= =piyR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-ppc-user@gentoo.org mailing list
RE: [gentoo-ppc-user] USB mouse; IN from bad port
Thanks, Joe! I'll check genkernel and get devices set and unset as you recommend. Any idea what device the port 1058 problem is connected with? Thanks! Mark M. Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joseph Jezak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 6:41 PM To: gentoo-ppc-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-ppc-user] USB mouse; IN from bad port -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark M. Hart wrote: Hi folks, I have two problems. Hi Mark, 1) I have a beige desktop Power Macintosh G3 (old-world) with first-edition roms. Gentoo installs great, Only thing is, I have an ADB mouse and a USB mouse. The ADB mouse works great, but I can?t figure out how to use the USB mouse. It is recognized during boot-up, and it shows a driver, but I can?t find anything in /dev that corresponds. I have udev enabled in the kernel, and listed as a module; udev shows up at boot-time in the kernel but fails as a module. Could that be part of my problem? Make sure that you have HID Input support in your kernel, otherwise, there won't be a driver for the mouse. If you intend on hotplugging the mouse, make sure you have hotplug installed as well. Once you have HID Input support and hotplug, plugging in the mouse should result in an extra /dev/input/mouseX device. If you don't want to have to select between the two, you can specify /dev/input/mice as your input device which should take input from all mouse devices. 2) Dmesg gives me a lot of IN from bad port 61 at c01b6488, and also IN from bad port 1058 at c0214430. Any idea what this is? Take a look at this for the IN from bad port message: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-ppc-faq.xml#infrombadport Good luck, - -Joe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEVWcowGq7BLLARfoRApGdAJsHa7Ta6lzEYjzYezg0zS3IzfsDswCgsUue hYXPvzdqPD8jhHZbBq3s6tg= =piyR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-ppc-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/327 - Release Date: 4/28/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/327 - Release Date: 4/28/2006 -- gentoo-ppc-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-ppc-user] USB mouse; IN from bad port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark M. Hart wrote: Thanks, Joe! I'll check genkernel and get devices set and unset as you recommend. Any idea what device the port 1058 problem is connected with? Thanks! Mark M. Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure about port 1058, but make sure all of those mentioned in the FAQ are turned off and see if it goes away. :) - -Joe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEVX/KwGq7BLLARfoRAv8IAKC/rVDhbdFZqTmrCnwfZusXgag0NACff/cG /atRzDWACj9VuPnB+bit+rA= =Vgwh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-ppc-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] PC freeze with ati-drivers and gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 13:14 +0200, Jannis Achstetter wrote: On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 22:00 +0200, Jannis Achstetter wrote: I don't say you have to but if I were you I would: - - update the xorg to 7.X - - build agpgart for your chipset into the kernel - - build the DRM for the ATI Radeon into the kernel can you specify what kernel version you're using, and what the config file names are for these two kernel options? I'm using 2.6.16-beyond-git12 here. 2.6.16-suspend2-r4 here... The agpgart is called CONFIG_AGP. You have to select the correct MB-chipset here, which is an SIS for me (CONFIG_AGP_SIS). Next, you need the DRM (CONFIG_DRM) and the Radeon-support for it (CONFIG_DRM_RADEON). Here is my device-section: [snip] Thanks, that's pretty much what I had. I'm interested in your framerates though. With glxgears I only get about 130 fps with the radeon driver, yet I get 2500+ fps with ati-drivers... Any suggestions? What can I look for to make sure I've done it right (apart from a working X!)? thanks, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au Two sure ways to tell a REALLY sexy man; the first is, he has a bad memory. I forget the second. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] How to make Gentoo more Ubuntu like
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 20:47 -0400, JimD wrote: Does anyone have any good link on making Gentoo a little more user-friendly like Ubunut? I am looking for basic home user stuff for my wife such as: Automount/play a music CD, DVD Automout a USB camera Little basic things like that. I personally just mount /mnt/cdrom, but trying to get my wife to do that or anything manual gets me in trouble Hi Jim, I won't bother echoing everyone elses response as to how.. however, out of curiousity I was wondering what your wife's reasoning for wanting Gentoo on her computer is when she does not want to learn how stuff works? :) Christel -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] PC freeze with ati-drivers and gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3
Iain Buchanan wrote: (snip) Thanks, that's pretty much what I had. I'm interested in your framerates though. With glxgears I only get about 130 fps with the radeon driver, yet I get 2500+ fps with ati-drivers... (snip) are u sure of that 2500+ fps.. I think its 250+ fps.. If not i'm ditching my nvidia card and buying ati.. :) But i'm sure when it comes to performance nvidia is the leader.. Bye, Farhan Ahmed -- Place : Bangalore, Karnataka, India GPG Key : 8BE90E98 WengoPhone ID : farhanahmed IRC Nick: farhanahmed / farhanahmed06 (irc.freenode.net) pgpRh05KFAODS.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Missing mixer item Headphone: Regression in Linux from 2.6.14.7 to 2.6.15
In the upgrade from Linux 2.6.14.7 to Linux 2.6.15 the mixer item Headphone was lost. This is with the driver intel8x0. The biggest problem with this regression is that it makes it impossible to turn off the internal speakers of the Dell Inspiron 8600 and only have sound when something is connected to the headphone port. Is there a fix or workaround for this problem? Did anyone else even notice? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Missing mixer item Headphone: Regression in Linux from 2.6.14.7 to 2.6.15
On 30/04/06, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the upgrade from Linux 2.6.14.7 to Linux 2.6.15 the mixer item Headphone was lost. This is with the driver intel8x0. The biggest problem with this regression is that it makes it impossible to turn off the internal speakers of the Dell Inspiron 8600 and only have sound when something is connected to the headphone port. Is there a fix or workaround for this problem? Did anyone else even notice? Are you sure this is not related to the last alsa related updates? -- Regards, Mick -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Missing mixer item Headphone: Regression in Linux from 2.6.14.7 to 2.6.15
Mick wrote: On 30/04/06, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the upgrade from Linux 2.6.14.7 to Linux 2.6.15 the mixer item Headphone was lost. This is with the driver intel8x0. The biggest problem with this regression is that it makes it impossible to turn off the internal speakers of the Dell Inspiron 8600 and only have sound when something is connected to the headphone port. Is there a fix or workaround for this problem? Did anyone else even notice? Are you sure this is not related to the last alsa related updates? It is certainly related to ALSA somehow, but what updates are you thinking of? I doubt it is the last updates, since the change was between 2.6.14.7 and 2.6.15, which was a while ago. I have just looked at the diff between 2.6.14.7 and 2.6.15. I did not see anything obvious, but it is huge, so I may have missed something. I have built a couple of kernels and see that it works fine when I boot with 2.6.14.7 or earlier and fails when I boot 2.6.15 or later. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] What's broken with portage now? [FIXED]
On 25/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 24 April 2006 05:01 am, Mick wrote: On 23/04/06, Glenn Enright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before you do that try emerge metadata or emerge sync Thanks guys. Emerge metadata creates multiple errors (here's an extract): = Failed cache update: dev-libs/gmime-2.1.14-r1 Corruption detected when reading key 'gmime-2.1.14-r1': dictionary update sequence element #0 has length 1; 2 is required Failed cache update: dev-libs/gmime-2.1.9-r3 Corruption detected when reading key 'gmime-2.1.9-r3': dictionary update sequence element #0 has length 1; 2 is required = What now? Shall I delete /var/cache/edb/dep/usr/portage, or some other file/directory too? Because I said I think it might (major emphasis on might) help is no reason to start deleting things. DO NOT delete anything without knowing what you're doing. I just said I thought it might force a rebuild-from-scratch of the cache, however, I have really no idea. If I built the software, that's what'd happen, but I didn't so that's where it is. I said it mainly in hopes that it might help someone more knowledgeable come to a real solution. If you still want to delete it, just let me ask you one thing: is this a toy, or a critical machine? Is this your linux box that works as a learning environment, or is this thing really part of a system that needs to be on? If it's just your playground, back everything important (of YOUR data, not OS settings and crap like that) to another computer and delete to your hearts content. You will most likely learn something. If you're like me, and really depend on the system, don't try such a step. I thought of writing this for posterity. The corruption was probably caused because of a couple of forced reboots, when I was trying to send this laptop to sleep and could not bring the screen back to life - what? no backups? tut, tut! I downloaded a fresh portage snapshot and replaced my corrupted portage directory. Before I did that I first moved and then restored my /usr/portage/distfiles to save bandwidth. Everything now works as it should. Thanks for all the replies. -- Regards, Mick -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] gthumb - can't save images
Hello! For quite some time now (since at least January 2006; since at least version 2.6.8), I cannot save JPEG images with gthumb (running 2.6.9 from my own overlay, but also with 2.6.8-r2) anymore. When I try to save a JPEG image, a 0 byte file gets created and in the terminal window I get the following output: (gthumb:18670): GdkPixbuf-WARNING **: Bad option name 'smooth' passed to JPEG saver (gthumb:18670): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_savev: assertion `error == NULL || *error != NULL' failed ** (gthumb:18670): CRITICAL **: _gtk_error_dialog_from_gerror_run: assertion `*gerror != NULL' failed As I'm running ~x86, I suppose that media-libs/gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-r5 is too new for the stable gthumb branch? Actually, I now installed gthumb 2.7.5.1, which is the unstable release of gthumb. But I'd like to go back to the stable branch. Has anyone else noticed problems with gthumb 2.6.x? I posted bugs reg. this. See: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130288 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340101 Bye, Alexander Skwar -- You can fool some of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, and that is sufficient. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] VMWare on Gentoo?
Kevin O'Gorman wrote on 04/30/06 06:51: I just got an evaluation copy of VMWare Workstation 5.5, and I'm momentarily glad I didn't pay for this thing. It seems to expect a RedHat style runlevel system. Has anybody successfully fooled with this thing to make it work on Gentoo? At the moment, its problems seem to be related to the daemon management features. I could clone them, but it would be a lot of work. The 5.5.1.19175-r3 ebuild runs perfectly here, give it a go. You *must* run vmware-config.pl as root after the install. If vmware-config.pl complains about being unable to shutdown the vmware services, rerun it using the -skipstopstart switch. rc-update add vmware default will fix your redhat runlevel problems. Make sure that the userid you're going to run vmware under is a member of the vmware group. Hope this helps. Dave -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo 2006.0 DVD hangs !
Rohit and Bhavana wrote: Hi there, I downloaded the ISO image and as I didn't have a blank CD handy, I burned it onto a single layer DVD [after all it was an ISO image, right?] and hoped for the best. Totally my fault. Should have verified the md5sun before messing two perfectly good media. regards, Rohit -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] PC freeze with ati-drivers and gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3
Martins Steinbergs a gentiment tapote: Hi, Well, It's me again, I was satisfied too quickly ! After upgrading xorg to xorg-x11-7.0-r1 and getting dri successfully, gdm still crashes at reboot (kernel panic). I really don't know what to do now :-( Any idea ? Thanks a lot, --- Jacques -- check xorg logs for drivers version mismatch, for example if u have following mouse driver version 1.1.0 installed, downgrade to 1.0.4, same for keybord * x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse Available versions: 1.0.4 [M] 1.1.0 too new xorg-server version and input drivers just doesnt work with ati-drivers m Are installed : x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard-1.0.1.3 and x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse-1.0.4 So I don't have the latest version. Thanks --- Jacques -- ^ ^^^ ^ ( 0 0 ) \/ ---- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Hi! Everybody!I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situation.Do you think so? And how can you solve this problem?-- wcw
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags?On 30/04/06, wu chuanwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Everybody!I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situation.Do you think so? And how can you solve this problem?-- wcw -- --Argument against Linux number 6,033:...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble.
[gentoo-user] Debugging an ebuild
I would like to debug an ebuild that is not working for me. I've googled and not found anything terrible useful. Can anyone point me at a HOWTO or some such? When I tried to 'ebuild' a copy the ebuild outside of the /usr/protage directory, it complains that it is not in a valid PORTDIR heirarchy. Is there a way to run do this? If I hack in some additional statements, ebuild fails with the 'digest verification'. Again, any pointers around this type of problem would be helpful. Thanks David -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
wu chuanwen wrote: Hi! Everybody! I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow? Not really. In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down. Works fine here. Many peple have the same situation. Haven't heard of. Do you think so? No, I don't. And how can you solve this problem? Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run firefox -ProfileManager. Alexander Skwar -- Would you people stop playing these stupid games?!?!? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Two things, AC97 sound and Gnome issues!
2006/4/27, Christopher E [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello all,if there is any one that can help me with the following two issue Iwould be greatful.1.I am have a error message when booting about snd_via82xx notfound.FATAL: Module snd_via82xx not found.is the exact message. Are you sure your sound module is snd_via82xx?I have a AC97 sound card,and the modules is not this one. I have the driver as part of the kernel, when I don't ALSA then givesa message like this:ALSA device list:Sound Card not foundI have emerged hal, dbus, alsa-utils and have added all of them torc-update level boot.I have run the alsaconf. 2.Now with gnome, when I type startx at the prompte I get the logo and then it stops, I then have to move the mouse and click on the logoand it goes away and then its just a blank screen.I have to doctrl+alt+backspace to get out and get to a prompte again. See the message after you do ctrl+alt+bachspace! If you have any other questions that I have not answered here please ask so this may get fixed.If any one knows how I could fix these issue I would be greatful andthankful to you.Sincerely,Christopher--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list-- wcw
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags?USE=gtk gnome gcj hal -qt -kde dvd alsa cdr nptl nptlonly pic.It's OK!Oh god! Just like now ,i just open two tab,it's so slow when i switch between the two tab. On 30/04/06, wu chuanwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Everybody!I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situation.Do you think so? And how can you solve this problem?-- wcw -- --Argument against Linux number 6,033: ...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble. -- wcw
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: wu chuanwen wrote: Hi! Everybody! I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow? Not really. In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down. Works fine here. Many peple have the same situation. Haven't heard of. Do you think so? No, I don't. And how can you solve this problem? Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run firefox -ProfileManager. Alexander Skwar -- Would you people stop playing these stupid games?!?!? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list Try using this: $ MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 firefox -- Andrea Barisani [EMAIL PROTECTED].*. Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V ( ) PGP-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( ) 0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E^^_^^ Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: wu chuanwen wrote: Hi! Everybody! I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?Not really. In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Works fine here. Many peple have the same situation.Haven't heard of.Really?Open this page ,you can see how many people complant firefox from april 15th! Do you think so?No, I don't. And how can you solve this problem? Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run firefox -ProfileManager.Can you tell me which version you are using ? Alexander Skwar--Would you people stop playing these stupid games?!?!?--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- wcw
[gentoo-user] KDE and OpenOffice keyboard problems
I'm running a compiled from source Open Office 2.01-r1 and am having problems getting OOo to accept input of accented, single and double quote characters under KDE 3.4.3. If I use IceWM, typing these characters works fine in OOo. I have CFLAGS=-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer and LINGUAS=en en_GB in my /etc/make.conf Nothing startling there. I'm running xorg-X11 version 6.8.2-r6, KDE version 3.4.3, Open Office 2.01-r1, all packages from the stable branch. In my /etc/xorg.conf I have the following entries for my keyboard: Section InputDevice Identifier Keyboard0 Driver kbd Option AutoRepeat500 30 Option XkbModel logicdp Option XkbLayout us_intl EndSection Being an old-fashioned Brit I have set up OOo to default to British English. However, as I live in Europe, I use a Logitech Cordless Desktop Pro US International keyboard, set to US International under KDE 3.4.3. I do not use UTF-8 for character encoding, but default to ISO-8859-15, to allow me to use the 'special' accented characters and the Euro sign. OOo does not recognise either single quote (') or double quote () unless I press the AltGr key (right Alt key). I cannot compose accented characters such as áàéèíìóòöuúù. The € sign works as expected with a US-international keyboard, using AltGr 5. I tried setting OOo to US English, but this did not resolve the problem. OOo stubbornly ignores both single and double quotes unless the AltGr key is pressed. Normally in 'US International' mode, both single and double quotes are produced using the quote key and a space. Applications such as Mozilla Thunderbird handle these quote characters correctly using the above keyboard set up. Only OOo ignores these keystrokes combinations. To persuade OOo to enter single or double quotes I have to use the Alt-Gr key and ' or . Strange indeed, OOo is the only application which behaves like this under KDE. Setting the xorg.conf Option XkbVariant deadkeys as suggested in the OOo documentation does not change the quote keys behaviour in OOo. I'm totally bewildered as to why OOo behaves so strangely under KDE, while working perfectly under (for example) IceWM. Has anyone else encountered this problem, or better still, have a work round or solution for it? Cheers, Dave. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, wu chuanwen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] : wu chuanwen wrote: Hi! Everybody! I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?Not really. In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Works fine here. Many peple have the same situation.Haven't heard of.Really?Open this page ,you can see how many people complant firefox from april 15th! I am sorry,i forget the link:http://www.linuxsir.org/bbs/showthread.php?t=252747 Do you think so? No, I don't. And how can you solve this problem? Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run firefox -ProfileManager.Can you tell me which version you are using ? Alexander Skwar--Would you people stop playing these stupid games?!?!?--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- wcw -- wcw
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Andrea Barisani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: wu chuanwen wrote: Hi! Everybody! I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow? Not really. In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down. Works fine here. Many peple have the same situation. Haven't heard of. Do you think so? No, I don't. And how can you solve this problem? Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run firefox -ProfileManager. Alexander Skwar -- Would you people stop playing these stupid games?!?!? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list Try using this:$ MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 firefoxIt seems better now, but i am not sure.I will be very appreciated if you can tell me what the command means!Thanks! --Andrea Barisani [EMAIL PROTECTED].*.Gentoo Linux Infrastructure DeveloperV ( ) PGP-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( )0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E^^_^^Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate --gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list-- wcw
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
On Sunday, April 30 2006 22:52, wu chuanwen wrote: I am sorry,i forget the link: http://www.linuxsir.org/bbs/showthread.php?t=252747 I don't think it'd be much help posting a Chinese forum thread in an English mailing list. -- Raymond Lewis Rebbeck -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] PC freeze with ati-drivers and gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 13:21 +0530, Farhan Ahmed wrote: Iain Buchanan wrote: (snip) Thanks, that's pretty much what I had. I'm interested in your framerates though. With glxgears I only get about 130 fps with the radeon driver, yet I get 2500+ fps with ati-drivers... (snip) are u sure of that 2500+ fps.. with glxgears, yes. I think its 250+ fps.. not for me :) If not i'm ditching my nvidia card and buying ati.. :) don't... But i'm sure when it comes to performance nvidia is the leader.. $ glxgears 13307 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2661.400 FPS That's with the ati-drivers, of course. This laptop is a 3GHz P4 with Radeon 9600, about a year old. A new nvidia will give you better performance. cya, -- Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au /* now make a new head in the exact same spot */ -- Larry Wall in cons.c from the perl source code -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sunday, April 30 2006 22:52, wu chuanwen wrote: I am sorry,i forget the link: http://www.linuxsir.org/bbs/showthread.php?t=252747 I don't think it'd be much help posting a Chinese forum thread in an Englishmailing list.I just mean to show that many people don't think firefox is so good and i search some methods to solve the problem. --Raymond Lewis Rebbeck--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list-- wcw
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
wu chuanwen wrote: Can you tell me which version you are using ? mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2 PS: Please only send HTML mails, if it is really necessary. Alexander Skwar -- There is only one word for aid that is genuinely without strings, and that word is blackmail. -- Colm Brogan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags? USE=gtk gnome gcj hal -qt -kde dvd alsa cdr nptl nptlonly pic. Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when you run emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox I get: [ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2-r1 [1.5.0.2] USE=-debug gnome -ipv6 java -mozdevelop -xinerama xprint 0 kB Have you yet tried a blank profile? Alexander Skwar PS: Please no HTML. Makes your posts harder to read. -- Is it really you, Fuzz, or is it Memorex, or is it radiation sickness? -- Sonic Disruptors comics -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Debugging an ebuild
On Sunday 30 April 2006 14:44, David Corbin wrote: I would like to debug an ebuild that is not working for me. I've googled and not found anything terrible useful. Can anyone point me at a HOWTO or some such? When I tried to 'ebuild' a copy the ebuild outside of the /usr/protage directory, it complains that it is not in a valid PORTDIR heirarchy. Is there a way to run do this? If I hack in some additional statements, ebuild fails with the 'digest verification'. Again, any pointers around this type of problem would be helpful. You better create an overlay to portage, see for example: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Installing_3rd_Party_Ebuilds See also ebuild man page: man -a ebuild ciao Francesco -- Linux Version 2.6.16-gentoo-r4, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Apr 26 06:59:58 CEST 2006 One 1GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 2GB RAM, 2007.31 Bogomips Total aemaeth -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox 1.5.0.2On 30/04/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags? USE=gtk gnome gcj hal -qt -kde dvd alsa cdr nptl nptlonly pic.Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when you runemerge -vpt mozilla-firefoxI get:[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2-r1 [1.5.0.2] USE=-debug gnome -ipv6 java -mozdevelop -xinerama xprint 0 kBHave you yet tried a blank profile?Alexander SkwarPS: Please no HTML. Makes your posts harder to read.--Is it really you, Fuzz, or is it Memorex, or is it radiation sickness? -- Sonic Disruptors comics--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list-- -- Argument against Linux number 6,033:...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble.
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUGOn 30/04/06, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox 1.5.0.2 On 30/04/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags? USE=gtk gnome gcj hal -qt -kde dvd alsa cdr nptl nptlonly pic.Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when you runemerge -vpt mozilla-firefoxI get:[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2-r1 [1.5.0.2] USE=-debug gnome -ipv6 java -mozdevelop -xinerama xprint 0 kBHave you yet tried a blank profile?Alexander SkwarPS: Please no HTML. Makes your posts harder to read.--Is it really you, Fuzz, or is it Memorex, or is it radiation sickness? -- Sonic Disruptors comics--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- -- Argument against Linux number 6,033:...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble. -- --Argument against Linux number 6,033:...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble.
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Jeff Rollin wrote: Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUG What's that supposed to do? It doesn't seem to be a valid USE flag. Alexander Skwar PS: Top posts are no good. -- Brian Griffin: Seriously, who buys a novelty fire extinguisher? Peter Griffin: I'll tell you who: someone who cares enough about physical comedy to put his entire family into serious danger, that's who. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Jeff Rollin wrote: I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox 1.5.0.2 If -O3 REALLY gives a speedup depends heavily on your CPU. You might not get a speedup at all - and, more likely, you might not get a *noticeable* speedup. Alexander Skwar PS: Please no HTML! -- How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb? One to hold the giraffe and one to fill the bathtub with brightly colored power tools. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags? USE=gtk gnome gcj hal -qt -kde dvd alsa cdr nptl nptlonly pic.Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when you runemerge -vpt mozilla-firefoxI get:[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2-r1 [1.5.0.2] USE=-debug gnome -ipv6 java -mozdevelop -xinerama xprint 0 kB I get this:[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2 [1.5.0.1-r4] USE=gnome ipv6 -debug -java -mozdevelop -xinerama -xprint 37 kB Have you yet tried a blank profile?What do you mean?How to do it? Alexander SkwarPS: Please no HTML. Makes your posts harder to read.Do you mean the link i gave in the mail before?Or another thing?I'm sorry if i bring you any troubles but i really don't know what happen. --Is it really you, Fuzz, or is it Memorex, or is it radiation sickness? -- Sonic Disruptors comics--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list-- wcw
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox 1.5.0.2I can't use O3 because i got many errors when complied my gentoo .I use O2,-- wcw
[gentoo-user] Init Scripts, net, and LinuxAnt DriverLoader
Hi All, I'm having a bit of trouble trying to get the Gentoo net init scripts to play nice with the linuxant driverloader ndiswrapper. First, yes I have tried (read: struggled) with ndiswrapper a fair bit with no luck...I can only get my card to connect to an unencrypted channel with ndiswrapper, and am not able to set any parameters, including the encryption key. driverloader works however, for the most part... So anyway here are some specs first: card: Linksys WPC54G v4 driver: wlipnds relevant lspci line: 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys, A Division of Cisco Systems [AirConn] INPROCOMM IPN 2220 Wireless LAN Adapter (rev 01) driverloader version: 2.33 now my problem is that when I try to start the interface created by the installed driverloader module using /etc/init.d/eth1... , it fails miserably. by fails miserably i mean it is unable to connect to my
[gentoo-user] Re: Init Scripts, net, and LinuxAnt DriverLoader
sorry, i accidentally sent that prematurely. as i was saying, the init scripts fail to set the encryption key and connect to my network. using iwconfig otoh i am able to set the essid, enc key and etc and connect to the AP of choice. worse, after running the init script the card becomes completely unable to connect--using iwconfig methods after using the init scripts has no effect, and even unloading the module , reloading it, and retsarting the driverloader init scripts does not remedy the situation. my question is can anyone tell me what the init scripts are doing in addition to what i would like them to do (execute the commands in /etc/conf.d/wireless) that may be clobbering my driver/card? any idea why the same commands work just fine usinmg iwconfig?? thanks in advance On 4/30/06, Leigh Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I'm having a bit of trouble trying to get the Gentoo net init scripts to play nice with the linuxant driverloader ndiswrapper. First, yes I have tried (read: struggled) with ndiswrapper a fair bit with no luck...I can only get my card to connect to an unencrypted channel with ndiswrapper, and am not able to set any parameters, including the encryption key. driverloader works however, for the most part... So anyway here are some specs first: card: Linksys WPC54G v4 driver: wlipnds relevant lspci line: 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys, A Division of Cisco Systems [AirConn] INPROCOMM IPN 2220 Wireless LAN Adapter (rev 01) driverloader version: 2.33 now my problem is that when I try to start the interface created by the installed driverloader module using /etc/init.d/eth1... , it fails miserably. by fails miserably i mean it is unable to connect to my
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Alexander, DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them smaller (and faster) Jeff. On 30/04/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Rollin wrote: I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox 1.5.0.2If -O3 REALLY gives a speedup depends heavily on your CPU. You might not get a speedup at all - and, more likely, you mightnot get a *noticeable* speedup.Alexander SkwarPS: Please no HTML!--How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb? One to hold the giraffe and one to fill the bathtub with brightly coloredpower tools.--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- --Argument against Linux number 6,033:...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble.
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
060430 wu chuanwen wrote: I think most of us are using firefox now. Do you think it's too slow? if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox, my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down. I have this problem with Independent (newspaper), but not generally. I suspect it's caused by heavy or badly-written Javascript. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban Community Studies TRANSIT`-O--O---' University of Toronto -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when you run emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox I get this: [ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2 [1.5.0.1-r4] USE=gnome ipv6 -debug -java -mozdevelop -xinerama -xprint 37 kB Do you really need ipv6? I doubt that this has anything to do with the problem at hand, but if you don't need it, you should remove it. If you don't know anything about ipv6, it's very probable that you don't need it. To the others: Is ipv6 still one of the default flags? Has this bug still not been fixed? Have you yet tried a blank profile? What do you mean? As I wrote: Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run firefox -ProfileManager. PS: Please no HTML. Makes your posts harder to read. Do you mean the link i gave in the mail before?Or another thing? I mean, that you compose your mails in gmail as HTML or rich text. This makes them bigger without adding any benefit to it - indeed, as you can see above, it makes it even worse, as there are no proper quote marks before the quoted text. Simply click on plain text. Alexander Skwar -- Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be prosecuted. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] x86 Install CD
Not sure if you've come up with a solution yet, but if you have a floppy or usb drive, you could do an 'emerge -pv ipw2200' to find out what files it needs, grab them from another system and just place them in '/usr/portage/distfiles'. This should let you install support for ipw2200.HTH,-Hani
Re: [gentoo-user] Is anyone using initramfs on Gentoo?
Norberto Bensa wrote: Unable to mount root fs on unknown block (1,0) Bug in mkinitd. It uses -c (old ascii format) and kernel seems to expect newc (srv4) Everything is working now. Thanks everyone! Regards, Norberto pgpjI6fMsynsj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]: wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when you run emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox I get this: [ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2 [1.5.0.1-r4] USE=gnome ipv6 -debug -java -mozdevelop -xinerama -xprint 37 kB Do you really need ipv6? I doubt that this has anything to do with the problem at hand, but if you don't need it, you should remove it. If you don't know anything about ipv6, it's very probable that you don't need it. thinks for this advice.Maybe next time when i am free i will re -emerge my firefox To the others: Is ipv6 still one of the default flags? Has this bug still not been fixed? Have you yet tried a blank profile? What do you mean? As I wrote: Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run firefox -ProfileManager. I have tried,and i am not sure it fater now! Just some time to see it. PS: Please no HTML. Makes your posts harder to read. Do you mean the link i gave in the mail before?Or another thing? I mean, that you compose your mails in gmail as HTML or rich text. This makes them bigger without adding any benefit to it - indeed, as you can see above, it makes it even worse, as there are no proper quote marks before the quoted text. Simply click on plain text. Oh! I know now.I use gmail(i think it is the best e-mail now which can sort you e-mail by topic and looks very good!)and never see my mail from the mail-list in other application. Is this mail OK now ? Alexander Skwar -- Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be prosecuted. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list Thanks for your reply! -- wcw -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
On 4/30/06, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander, DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them smaller (and faster) Maybe as a CFLAG, but not a USE flag. And it will only affect gnome/glib/gtk applications. PS: As Alexander already said, please do not top post, and learn to trim your replies. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] How to make Gentoo more Ubuntu like
On 4/29/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make sure your GNOME packages (esp. gnome-volume-manager and related) are compiled with USE=hal, and make sure the hal and dbus services are started. With those in place, it should Just Work(tm). And also make sure she is a member of the 'plugdev' group. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Am Sonntag 30 April 2006 14:24 schrieb wu chuanwen: I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situation.Do you think so? And how can you solve this problem? Most certainly, this is a memory issue. For every tab you have open, Firefox keeps a 30-something pages history cache in memory, including pictures, for quicker back-browsing. If you are under tight memory (512MB, I'd say), you quickly notice that the memory requirements of Firefox make the computer start to swap, and that the system slows down considerably. You can turn off this history-caching somewhere, someplace on about:config, but I wouldn't know where. Search the net. You're not the first one to complain about this. --- Heiko. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Broken install?
On 4/29/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kernel /boot/kern[TAB] (grub auto-completes) root=/dev[TAB] Error 11: Unrecongnized device string. This is not a problem. The kernel will use an internal mapping to figure out what the device major and minor number is for /dev/sda1. It does not depend on anything being in /dev. The actual /dev on the root filesystem only needs null and console. Note that udev usually runs on a ramfs or tmpfs filesystem, so all of the nodes that you see when the system is running exist only in memory, not on any disk. Just use root=/dev/sda1, and the system should boot fine. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Broken install? - Fixed
On 4/29/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Jolet wrote: that should not have been necessary. my grey hairs are telling me you'll encounter other problems down the road is udev enabled in the kernel? I thought udev was just userland? What option would I need in the kernel? There is no kernel option. If it is installed, it will be used, unless you specify something else for RC_DEVICES in /etc/conf.d/rc. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
wu chuanwen wrote: Oh! I know now.I use gmail(i think it is the best e-mail now which can sort you e-mail by topic and looks very good!)and never see my mail from the mail-list in other application. Is this mail OK now ? Yes, that's *VERY* *MUCH* better now. Thanks a lot! Alexander Skwar -- In one moment, Earth; in the next, Heaven. -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov, For I Have Tasted The Fruit -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Heiko Wundram [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Sonntag 30 April 2006 14:24 schrieb wu chuanwen: I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situation.Do you think so? And how can you solve this problem? Most certainly, this is a memory issue. For every tab you have open, Firefox keeps a 30-something pages history cache in memory, including pictures, for quicker back-browsing. If you are under tight memory (512MB, I'd say), you My memory is 512mb,but still consider what you said is the point. quickly notice that the memory requirements of Firefox make the computer start to swap, and that the system slows down considerably. You can turn off this history-caching somewhere, someplace on about:config, but I wouldn't know where. Search the net. You're not the first one to complain about this. I have larger the cache to 80MB. It's not enough now? --- Heiko. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- wcw -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
On 4/30/06, Heiko Wundram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag 30 April 2006 14:24 schrieb wu chuanwen: I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situation.Do you think so? And how can you solve this problem?Most certainly, this is a memory issue. For every tab you have open, Firefoxkeeps a 30-something pages history cache in memory, including pictures, for quicker back-browsing. If you are under tight memory (512MB, I'd say), youquickly notice that the memory requirements of Firefox make the computerstart to swap, and that the system slows down considerably. You can turn off this history-caching somewhere, someplace on about:config,but I wouldn't know where. Search the net. You're not the first one tocomplain about this.I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we used today. -- -=::=--=::=- K35/\R/\ -=::=--=::=-
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 4/30/06, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander, DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them smaller (and faster) Maybe as a CFLAG, but not a USE flag. And it will only affect gnome/glib/gtk applications. Are you sure it can work?Is there anybody else using it ?I have never heard of such cflag or use flag PS: As Alexander already said, please do not top post, and learn to trim your replies. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- wcw -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 4/30/06, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander, DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them smaller (and faster) Maybe as a CFLAG, but not a USE flag. And it will only affect gnome/glib/gtk applications. Are you sure it can work?Is there anybody else using it ?I have never heard of such cflag or use flag Me neither. It seems that portage doesn't know about such a USE flag (euse -i DG_DISABLE_DEBUG doesn't show anything) and CFLAG - well, I don't know. It seems that also very few people use it - google doesn't return much and in the Gentoo forums, only one person called DizL sems to use ist. Alexander Skwar -- I can't decide which WRONG TURN to make first!! I wonder if BOB GUCCIONE has these problems! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] modprobe looks in wrong dir
Hi group, This should be an easy fix -- if you already know! The reason many of my modules are not loading is because modprobe is looking in /lib/modules/2.6.12-r6 and not /lib/modules/2.6.16-r3 which was filled when I ran make modules_install. The link to the newer kernel is OK. Yes, I ran modules-update. Also, module loading and unloading options are set=y in kernel. Not a clue as to why some modules load, sound, usb; and some, firewire, ppp, forcedeth don't. dmesg is filled with lines like: Unknown symbol ...disagrees about version of symbol ... At the end of the boot console it says: /usr/sbin/pppd/: Couldn't stat /dev/ttyS0: Too many levels of symbolic links. But according to emerge -pv udev I have the latest ver. Which I set up according to the gentoo udev-guide. Attempts to specify the proper dir to modprobe result in no-such-file errors. -mw __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Kesara Rathnayake wrote: I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we used today. To find out, I asked OP to create a blank profile. I also assume a local problem at his side. OP should simply create a new profile and report back. Alexander Skwar PS: I begin to hate Googlemail because of the default to use HTML even if it is not required. Sucks. Big time. Another thing that sucks, is that HTML mails are permitted on this list. Why not just dump the HTML part (and every other attachment)? -- Well, you can implement a Perl peek() with unpack('P',...). Once you have that, there's only security through obscurity. :-) -- Larry Wall in [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: modprobe looks in wrong dir
On Sunday 30 April 2006 20:18, maxim wexler wrote: Hi group, This should be an easy fix -- if you already know! The reason many of my modules are not loading is because modprobe is looking in /lib/modules/2.6.12-r6 and not /lib/modules/2.6.16-r3 which was filled when I ran make modules_install. The link to the newer kernel is OK. Yes, I ran modules-update. [...] It seems like you compiled your kernel but forgot to execute make modules_install step. ciao Francesco -- Linux Version 2.6.16-gentoo-r4, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Apr 26 06:59:58 CEST 2006 One 1GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 2GB RAM, 2007.31 Bogomips Total aemaeth -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] modprobe looks in wrong dir
Did you remake the modules when you installed the kernel? Some such as nvidia, alsa require you rerun their installation process. On Sunday April 30 2006 14:18, maxim wexler wrote: Hi group, This should be an easy fix -- if you already know! The reason many of my modules are not loading is because modprobe is looking in /lib/modules/2.6.12-r6 and not /lib/modules/2.6.16-r3 which was filled when I ran make modules_install. The link to the newer kernel is OK. Yes, I ran modules-update. Also, module loading and unloading options are set=y in kernel. Not a clue as to why some modules load, sound, usb; and some, firewire, ppp, forcedeth don't. dmesg is filled with lines like: Unknown symbol ...disagrees about version of symbol ... At the end of the boot console it says: /usr/sbin/pppd/: Couldn't stat /dev/ttyS0: Too many levels of symbolic links. But according to emerge -pv udev I have the latest ver. Which I set up according to the gentoo udev-guide. Attempts to specify the proper dir to modprobe result in no-such-file errors. -mw __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Brett I. Holcomb -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Jeff Rollin wrote: DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them smaller (and faster) I dont think there is any use flags like DG_DISABLE_DEBUG.. As for as debugging symbols goes the use flag 'debug' control them i guess.. And as far as i know on x86 arch it -debug, so by default it strips debugging info from binaries.. Here's a snip from portage/profiles/use.desc: debug - Tells configure and the makefiles to build for debugging. Effects vary across packages, but generally it will at least add -g to CFLAGS. Remember to set FEATURES=nostrip too Farhan Ahmed -- Place : Bangalore, Karnataka, India GPG Key : 8BE90E98 WengoPhone ID : farhanahmed IRC Nick: farhanahmed / farhanahmed06 (irc.freenode.net) pgpc5NL3Fsmfh.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Alexander Skwar wrote: (snip)_ To the others: Is ipv6 still one of the default flags? Has this bug still not been fixed? (snip) Well in default-linux/{alpha,amd64,arm,hppa,ia64,m68k,s390,sh,x86} profiles, its on by default.. I don know for sure that in hardened profile it's turned off.. Farhan Ahmed -- Place : Bangalore, Karnataka, India GPG Key : 8BE90E98 WengoPhone ID : farhanahmed IRC Nick: farhanahmed / farhanahmed06 (irc.freenode.net) pgpoyNI9HLIeQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Alexander Skwar wrote: (snip) PS: I begin to hate Googlemail because of the default to use HTML even if it is not required. Sucks. Big time. Another thing that sucks, is that HTML mails are permitted on this list. Why not just dump the HTML part (and every other attachment)? Well I think imposing things is a bad way, I'm sure why we all hate M$ is because it imposes things on us and gives us no choice.. How bout making the users know bout things and let them decide.. I think you just converted one mailer from HTML to text.. I guess that's what required.. Proper guidance and knowledge not some rules which deny users the right to post, just because they do not know whether their mail client is sending mail in HTML format.. Farhan Ahmed -- Place : Bangalore, Karnataka, India GPG Key : 8BE90E98 WengoPhone ID : farhanahmed IRC Nick: farhanahmed / farhanahmed06 (irc.freenode.net) pgphHy485E3KH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications too-- --Argument against Linux number 6,033: ...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble.
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sunday, April 30 2006 22:52, wu chuanwen wrote: http://www.linuxsir.org/bbs/showthread.php?t=252747 I don't think it'd be much help posting a Chinese forum thread in an English mailing list. I just mean to show that many people don't think firefox is so good But most of the people here can't read what's written there: for all we know they could be singing the praises of spaghetti. :) Maybe, though, your Firefox gets slow because of the Chinese (?) characters? Have you tried visiting only English sites for a while? And if it's caused by bad or heavy use of Javascript, also try avoiding the sites you usually visit, hop around on gentoo.org and similar sites, open lots of tabs and see what happens there. Benno -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
On 21:11 Sun 30 Apr , Jeff Rollin wrote: I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications too Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUG -- Join The no2id Coalition, http://www.no2id.net/ djm -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
whoops! my badOn 30/04/06, David Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21:11 Sun 30 Apr , Jeff Rollin wrote: I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications tooOh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUG--Join The no2id Coalition, http://www.no2id.net/djm--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list-- --Argument against Linux number 6,033:...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble.
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Jeff Rollin wrote: I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications too Read your earlier post.. Anyway where is this CFLAGS 'DG_DISABLE_DEBUG' documented? I cant find any reference to it in man gcc. No usable results came up when i googled it.. Farhan Ahmed -- Place : Bangalore, Karnataka, India GPG Key : 8BE90E98 WengoPhone ID : farhanahmed IRC Nick: farhanahmed / farhanahmed06 (irc.freenode.net) pgpge8hV5GqdM.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] ssmtp.conf security concern
Good afternoon, I solved my problem of a few days ago by adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthPass=PASSWORD to /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf. This was related to my ISP now requiring SMTP AUTH for mail. But I'm concerned about the security implications of having this in a world-readable file. If this was only necessary to get mutt mail off my system, I could just add set sendmail=/usr/sbin/ssmtp -au [EMAIL PROTECTED] -ap PASSWORD to my .muttrc file. But cron also need this in order to mail me results of nightly jobs using mailx. I realize this is just a single user system, but this solution just doesn't seem right. Are there config options that can be placed in individual $HOME rc files, ie. $HOME/.ssmtp.conf. I can't seem to track down much documentation on ssmtp.conf. I don't really want to go with something fullblown like sendmail. Thanks, festus -- It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a clearer picture of reality than those who wield it. Noam Chomsky pgpYJ9VLmyHgF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
On 02:04 Mon 01 May , Farhan Ahmed wrote: Jeff Rollin wrote: I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications too Read your earlier post.. Anyway where is this CFLAGS 'DG_DISABLE_DEBUG' documented? I cant find any reference to it in man gcc. No usable results came up when i googled it.. $cat example.c #include stdio.h #ifdef FISH #define A 1 #endif int main() { if (A == 1) printf(fish!\n); } $ gcc -DFISH example.c -o example $ ./example fish! $ gcc example.c -o example example.c: In function ‘main’: example.c:9: error: ‘A’ undeclared (first use in this function) example.c:9: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once example.c:9: error: for each function it appears in.) (a fairly contrived example, I know) -- Join The no2id Coalition, http://www.no2id.net/ djm -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Problems moving /boot partiton
Hi, I am attempting to move my /boot partition on a specific machine to make way for a Windows XP dual boot. This machine is the only one with a graphics adapter that meets the requirements of my son's new game. and right now the machine is no longer booting.. Bummer OK, so I used to have /dev/sda1 /boot /dev/sda2 swap /dev/sda3 / and then some higher partitions, and a bunch of unused disk space. To get ready to add Windows I created two new partitions: /dev/sda9 /boot /dev/sda10 swap First I added the new swap to fstab, rebooted and made sure it was picked up correctly. I then copied everything in the old boot /dev/sda1 to the new boot /dev/sda9 and modified the grub.conf file on the new boot partition to ensure it was getting called with new names for the boot options after I rebooted. I also attempted to change the boot options themselves to point at the new boot partition. The old grub.conf and new grub.conf file examples are shown: OLD: title 2.6.16-gentoo-r2 root (hd0,0) kernel (hd0,0)/boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 root=/dev/sda3 NEW: title New Layot 2.6.16-gentoo-r2 root (hd0,8) kernel (hd0,8)/boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 root=/dev/sda3 When this was complete I ran grub using the commands grub root (hd0,8) setup (hd0) quit My understand of the above is that the root (hd0,8) says place the second part of grub on /dev/sda9 (drive 0, partition 8) while the second says place the first part of grub in the MRB. I then rebooted: 1) There is a long delay. I then get a message about the kernel file not being found. Grub drops me into the grub choice screen which is messed up text. 2) I do see the 'New Layout' names so it does seem to be finding /dev/sda9 with the new text 3) None of the options work. I've now rebooted using the Gentoo 2006.0 install CD. The kernels are on /dev/sda9 so it seems grub should be able to find them but it isn't. Can anyone suggest what I'm missing here? thanks, Mark -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ssmtp.conf security concern
John J. Foster wrote: Good afternoon, I solved my problem of a few days ago by adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthPass=PASSWORD to /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf. This was related to my ISP now requiring SMTP AUTH for mail. But I'm concerned about the security implications of having this in a world-readable file. If this was only necessary to get mutt mail off my system, I could just add set sendmail=/usr/sbin/ssmtp -au [EMAIL PROTECTED] -ap PASSWORD to my .muttrc file. But cron also need this in order to mail me results of nightly jobs using mailx. I realize this is just a single user system, but this solution just doesn't seem right. Are there config options that can be placed in individual $HOME rc files, ie. $HOME/.ssmtp.conf. I can't seem to track down much documentation on ssmtp.conf. I don't really want to go with something fullblown like sendmail. How bout using msmtp? It's lightweight and is well documented (?).. To use it change the value of sendmail in your .muttrc to this: set sendmail=/usr/bin/msmtp Also fill in your account details in ~/.msmtprc: account default host smtp.your_provider.net from [EMAIL PROTECTED] #see man page for more auth options auth login user your_username password your_password #If your SMTP Server supports TLS encryption, uncomment the next line #tls Be sure to execute chmod 0600 ~/.msmtprc I copied these info from Gentoo Documentation.. Hope this helps.. Personally i use postfix with my gmail account.. Farhan Ahmed P.S: Give muttng a try.. It has lots of features like nntp, smtp, sidebar support and plenty.. -- Place : Bangalore, Karnataka, India GPG Key : 8BE90E98 WengoPhone ID : farhanahmed IRC Nick: farhanahmed / farhanahmed06 (irc.freenode.net) pgpINKeC6F08c.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems moving /boot partiton
Try executing this command from the grub command line: find /boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 It'll return the partition where it finds the file.. It should be something like (ab0,x).. Then as usual enter the grub commands.. root (ab0,x) setup (ab0) quit Hope this helps, Farhan Ahmed -- Place : Bangalore, Karnataka, India GPG Key : 8BE90E98 WengoPhone ID : farhanahmed IRC Nick: farhanahmed / farhanahmed06 (irc.freenode.net) pgpp9KdAyOXlk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems moving /boot partiton
On Sunday 30 April 2006 16:01, Mark Knecht wrote: Hi, I am attempting to move my /boot partition on a specific machine to make way for a Windows XP dual boot. This machine is the only one with a graphics adapter that meets the requirements of my son's new game. and right now the machine is no longer booting.. Bummer OK, so I used to have /dev/sda1 /boot /dev/sda2 swap /dev/sda3 / and then some higher partitions, and a bunch of unused disk space. To get ready to add Windows I created two new partitions: /dev/sda9 /boot /dev/sda10 swap First I added the new swap to fstab, rebooted and made sure it was picked up correctly. I then copied everything in the old boot /dev/sda1 to the new boot /dev/sda9 and modified the grub.conf file on the new boot partition to ensure it was getting called with new names for the boot options after I rebooted. I also attempted to change the boot options themselves to point at the new boot partition. The old grub.conf and new grub.conf file examples are shown: OLD: title 2.6.16-gentoo-r2 root (hd0,0) kernel (hd0,0)/boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 root=/dev/sda3 NEW: title New Layot 2.6.16-gentoo-r2 root (hd0,8) kernel (hd0,8)/boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 root=/dev/sda3 When this was complete I ran grub using the commands grub root (hd0,8) setup (hd0) quit My understand of the above is that the root (hd0,8) says place the second part of grub on /dev/sda9 (drive 0, partition 8) while the second says place the first part of grub in the MRB. I then rebooted: 1) There is a long delay. I then get a message about the kernel file not being found. Grub drops me into the grub choice screen which is messed up text. 2) I do see the 'New Layout' names so it does seem to be finding /dev/sda9 with the new text 3) None of the options work. I've now rebooted using the Gentoo 2006.0 install CD. The kernels are on /dev/sda9 so it seems grub should be able to find them but it isn't. Can anyone suggest what I'm missing here? thanks, Mark at the grub menu, can you get to the grub command line and do find /boot/grub/grub.conf? what drives/partitions does it show that being on? if you set this up right, it should find it on both. also, remember in fdisk to set the /dev/sda9 partion's boot flag. -- John Jolet Your On-Demand IT Department 512-762-0729 www.jolet.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Is anyone using initramfs on Gentoo?
I do hope you have read the appropriate documentation. In the Gentoo world, we have a thing called genkernel. Genkernel receives a lot of bad publicity sometimes but it realy is a nice tool if you graduate from the simple command line. Under genkernel you have several options for building either kernel modules initramfs In fact, the default under 2.6.x kernels is to build an initramfs for you. it will also install the entire mess for you. And make the Correct entry in your grub.conf Here's the magic. if you go in and take a look at the scripts that make up genkernel, you will start to see that you can create any type of initramfs you like. For further information, RTFM On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 02:24 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: Hello list, I've tried to move my built-in ide (via) and rootfs (reiser) modules outside of the kernel, but when I try to boot the new kernel and its corresponding initramfs, it fails miserably with one of the following messages. If I use root=/dev/hda7 (my root): Unable to mount root fs on unknown block (3,7) If I use root=/dev/ram (that's the device in the initramfs made with mkinitrd): Unable to mount root fs on unknown block (1,0) I do this every day using Debian boxes, so why it is so hard on Gentoo? What's the correct way to make _and_ use an initramfs on Gentoo? Many thanks in advance, Norberto
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: modprobe looks in wrong dir
modules-update only updates for the running version. In order to update the new version, you could simply reboot to the new version. On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 20:32 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: On Sunday 30 April 2006 20:18, maxim wexler wrote: Hi group, This should be an easy fix -- if you already know! The reason many of my modules are not loading is because modprobe is looking in /lib/modules/2.6.12-r6 and not /lib/modules/2.6.16-r3 which was filled when I ran make modules_install. The link to the newer kernel is OK. Yes, I ran modules-update. [...] It seems like you compiled your kernel but forgot to execute make modules_install step. ciao Francesco -- Linux Version 2.6.16-gentoo-r4, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Apr 26 06:59:58 CEST 2006 One 1GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 2GB RAM, 2007.31 Bogomips Total aemaeth
Re: [gentoo-user] Is anyone using initramfs on Gentoo?
On Sunday 30 April 2006 16:30, Maurice E Johnson wrote: I do hope you have read the appropriate documentation. In the Gentoo world, we have a thing called genkernel. Genkernel receives a lot of bad publicity sometimes but it realy is a nice tool if you graduate from the simple command line. Under genkernel you have several options for building either kernel modules initramfs In fact, the default under 2.6.x kernels is to build an initramfs for you. it will also install the entire mess for you. which is how i'm booting off a raid 1 /boot partition, which everything else (including / and swap) on an lvm on a raid5. genkernel will allow you to also issue --menuconfig which will allow you into the kernel configuration process. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ssmtp.conf security concern
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:37:20AM +0530, Farhan Ahmed wrote: How bout using msmtp? It's lightweight and is well documented (?).. To use it change the value of sendmail in your .muttrc to this: I'm reading the manual right now, and will probably try it tonight. Farhan Ahmed P.S: Give muttng a try.. It has lots of features like nntp, smtp, sidebar support and plenty.. I tried using muttng on and off since it came out. Had some nice features that aren't in mainline, but too unstable for me, and just about totally unsupported right now. Thanks, festus -- It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a clearer picture of reality than those who wield it. Noam Chomsky pgpJ9w4dFQAw0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems moving /boot partiton
On 4/30/06, Farhan Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try executing this command from the grub command line: find /boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 It'll return the partition where it finds the file.. It should be something like (ab0,x).. Then as usual enter the grub commands.. root (ab0,x) setup (ab0) quit Hope this helps, Farhan Ahmed Hi Farhan and John, First, thanks for the quick responses. 1) I've booted again from the unversal Install CD. I have two consoles open - one is in the install environment and the second is in the chroot'ed environment. 2) In the install environment it tells me that I have /dev/sda3 mounted at /mnt/gentoo and /dev/sda9 mounted at /mnt/gentoo/boot 3) In the chroot'ed environment I run grub and then your find command. It says Error 15: File not found grub 4) In the install environment I can see the kernel file at /mnt/gentoo/boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 5) In the chroot'ed environment I can see the kernel file at /boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 6) I thoought grub supported tab completion but maybe that's only at boot time. While running grub in a console in the chroot'ed environment tabs are just moving the cursor to the right. Let me know what other info you might need to make another guess. Thanks again for your help! Cheers, Mark -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems moving /boot partiton
Mark Knecht wrote: 5) In the chroot'ed environment I can see the kernel file at /boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 How did you copy sda1 to sda9? Probably on sda1 there was a symlink: boot - /, which you didn't preserve during copying. Either create this symlink, or remove /boot from kernel (hd0,8)/boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2. Benno -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems moving /boot partiton
On Sunday 30 April 2006 16:57, Mark Knecht wrote: On 4/30/06, Farhan Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try executing this command from the grub command line: find /boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 It'll return the partition where it finds the file.. It should be something like (ab0,x).. Then as usual enter the grub commands.. root (ab0,x) setup (ab0) quit Hope this helps, Farhan Ahmed Hi Farhan and John, First, thanks for the quick responses. 1) I've booted again from the unversal Install CD. I have two consoles open - one is in the install environment and the second is in the chroot'ed environment. 2) In the install environment it tells me that I have /dev/sda3 mounted at /mnt/gentoo and /dev/sda9 mounted at /mnt/gentoo/boot 3) In the chroot'ed environment I run grub and then your find command. It says Error 15: File not found grub 4) In the install environment I can see the kernel file at /mnt/gentoo/boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 5) In the chroot'ed environment I can see the kernel file at /boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 6) I thoought grub supported tab completion but maybe that's only at boot time. While running grub in a console in the chroot'ed environment tabs are just moving the cursor to the right. Let me know what other info you might need to make another guess. Thanks again for your help! Cheers, Mark the find command i meant for you to run was at boot time..hit e when the grub menu comes up, then c for command-line Now, did you get into fdisk and make sure your hda9 had a * in the boot column? -- John Jolet Your On-Demand IT Department 512-762-0729 www.jolet.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems moving /boot partiton
On 4/30/06, Benno Schulenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Knecht wrote: 5) In the chroot'ed environment I can see the kernel file at /boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2 How did you copy sda1 to sda9? Probably on sda1 there was a symlink: boot - /, which you didn't preserve during copying. Either create this symlink, or remove /boot from kernel (hd0,8)/boot/bzImage-2.6.16-gentoo-r2. Benno Benno, Thanks. That seems to have been the problem. I added the symlink in and the machine booted fine: lightning ~ # mount /boot/ lightning ~ # df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda3 9614148 7521752 1604020 83% / udev513756 304513452 1% /dev /dev/sda6 3850292 2501984 1152720 69% /usr/src /dev/sda7 11543016 3460680 7495968 32% /mnt/gentoo32 /dev/sda8 14428928 11624384 2071580 85% /home shm 513756 0513756 0% /dev/shm none513756 0513756 0% /tmp/jack /dev/sda9 101086 8202 87665 9% /boot lightning ~ # Thanks to everyone for all the help. Cheers, Mark -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Alexander Skwar wrote: Jeff Rollin wrote: Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUG What's that supposed to do? It doesn't seem to be a valid USE flag. I think he meant as CFLAGS, not as USE. In any case, it would only have an effect in code that supports the G_DISABLE_DEBUG macro... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] How to make Gentoo more Ubuntu like
Richard Fish wrote: On 4/29/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make sure your GNOME packages (esp. gnome-volume-manager and related) are compiled with USE=hal, and make sure the hal and dbus services are started. With those in place, it should Just Work(tm). And also make sure she is a member of the 'plugdev' group. -Richard Yes, right. I always forget that one. Thanks. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Farhan Ahmed wrote: Jeff Rollin wrote: I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications too Read your earlier post.. Anyway where is this CFLAGS 'DG_DISABLE_DEBUG' documented? I cant find any reference to it in man gcc. No usable results came up when i googled it.. Farhan Ahmed It's not a CFLAG, at least not a compiler flag as you would be familiar with them. It's -DG_DISABLE_DEBUG, with the hyphen at the beginning, and all it does is tell the compiler to activate a setting called G_DISABLE_DEBUG in code that uses it. From my own Googling, it looks like it's meant to be used by applications linking against Glib in their build scripts, not by end users. In any case, if you're going to use -DG_DISABLE_DEBUG, you should also add its converse, -UG_ENABLE_DEBUG, since that seems to be the 'proper' way to do it. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] How to make Gentoo more Ubuntu like
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:46:15 +0100 Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: Hi Jim, I won't bother echoing everyone elses response as to how.. however, out of curiousity I was wondering what your wife's reasoning for wanting Gentoo on her computer is when she does not want to learn how stuff works? :) Christel i get the impression its not jim's wife who wanted gentoo on the laptop :-) -- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] How to make Gentoo more Ubuntu like
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Ryan Tandy wrote: Richard Fish wrote: On 4/29/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Make sure your GNOME packages (esp. gnome-volume-manager and related) are compiled with USE=hal, and make sure the hal and dbus services are started. With those in place, it should Just Work(tm). And also make sure she is a member of the 'plugdev' group. -Richard Yes, right. I always forget that one. Thanks. It occurs to me that this would make a very nice little howto. Perhaps the best one to write it would be the original asker (Ryan?) since he'll have the feedback from his wife, but if no one else wants to do it I'll do it. Michael -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
Hmm,Unfortunately it's so long ago that I don't remember where I saw it. Anyway, works for me.Jeff.On 01/05/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Farhan Ahmed wrote: Jeff Rollin wrote: I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications too Read your earlier post.. Anyway where is this CFLAGS 'DG_DISABLE_DEBUG' documented? I cant find any reference to it in man gcc. No usable results came up when i googled it.. Farhan AhmedIt's not a CFLAG, at least not a compiler flag as you would be familiar with them.It's -DG_DISABLE_DEBUG, with the hyphen at the beginning,and all it does is tell the compiler to activate a setting calledG_DISABLE_DEBUG in code that uses it.From my own Googling, it lookslike it's meant to be used by applications linking against Glib in their build scripts, not by end users.In any case, if you're going to use -DG_DISABLE_DEBUG, you should alsoadd its converse, -UG_ENABLE_DEBUG, since that seems to be the 'proper'way to do it.-- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list-- --Argument against Linux number 6,033:...So this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus yourself, become root, install it and then run it. Seems like a lot of work just to experience what you can get on Windows with a lot less trouble.
Re: [gentoo-user] How to make Gentoo more Ubuntu like
The wiki is the place for it I believe. There is already a kde howto: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_D-BUS%2C_HAL%2C_KDE_media:/ On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:47:26 -0400 JimD wrote: Does anyone have any good link on making Gentoo a little more user-friendly like Ubunut? I am looking for basic home user stuff for my wife such as: Automount/play a music CD, DVD Automout a USB camera Little basic things like that. I personally just mount /mnt/cdrom, but trying to get my wife to do that or anything manual gets me in trouble : ) Jim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= There's no place like 127.0.0.1 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= JimD Central FL, USA, Earth, Sol -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 01:35:18PM +, wu chuanwen wrote: Try using this: $ MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 firefox It seems better now, but i am not sure. I will be very appreciated if you can tell me what the command means! Thanks! It disables pango library usage, there's a known bug about it that makes firefox scrolling and stuff very slow. Google for it and you'll find lots of reports about it. Cheers -- Andrea Barisani [EMAIL PROTECTED].*. Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V ( ) PGP-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( ) 0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E^^_^^ Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Is anyone using initramfs on Gentoo?
John Jolet wrote: genkernel will allow you to also issue --menuconfig which will allow you into the kernel configuration process. I really didn't know that! I thought genkernel just compiled everything! Anyway, I fixed the problem with my initramfs. It was a bug in mkinitrd. I still need to open a bug about this issue. Many thanks to everyone (forums and gentoo-user)! -- Norberto Bensa Cel: 5654-9539 Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina pgpXWV0u1xoeB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/5/1, Andrea Barisani [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 01:35:18PM +, wu chuanwen wrote: Try using this: $ MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 firefox It seems better now, but i am not sure. I will be very appreciated if you can tell me what the command means! Thanks! It disables pango library usage, there's a known bug about it that makes firefox scrolling and stuff very slow. Google for it and you'll find lots of reports about it. Is there any way to fix it? I just don' t start firefox everytime like that. Cheers -- Andrea Barisani [EMAIL PROTECTED].*. Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V ( ) PGP-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( ) 0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E^^_^^ Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- wcw -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
On 4/30/06, Farhan Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Rollin wrote: I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications too Read your earlier post.. Anyway where is this CFLAGS 'DG_DISABLE_DEBUG' documented? I cant find any reference to it in man gcc. No usable results came up when i googled it.. I did some more digging on this. Actually it looks like -DG_DISABLE_DEBUG won't have any effect on glib/gtk/gnome applications. There is no such thing in /usr/include, or in the current sources for glib or gtk. There *is* G_ENABLE_DEBUG, which is only turned on if you merge glib or gtk with USE=debug, which configures glib/gtk with ./configure ... --enable-debug=yes The default glib/gtk debug configuration is minimum. Glibc and gtk also support configuring with --enable-debug=no, which adds -DG_DISABLE_ASSERT, -DG_DISABLE_CHECKS, and/or -DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS to CFLAGS when they are built. However, there is no USE flag currently available to set --enable-debug=no. (If you desire this, file a bug report on bugzilla for the feature enhancement). It is possible you could get the effect of --enable-debug=no by adding -UG_DISABLE_ASSERT, -UG_DISABLE_CHECKS, and -UG_DISABLE_CAST to CFLAGS, but it depends upon whether the package build takes user-defined CFLAGS into account before or after ./configure defined flags. If ./configure is added after the user flags, they will have no effect. I have not investigated this at all... Jeff, whoever told you that -DG_DISABLE_DEBUG did something was lying. Current gtk and glibc sources know nothing about this flag. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] KDE crashing on startup
Hi there, Im using a PPC arch., and noticed that upon selecting kde-3.5 from my freshly emerged kdm that after a minute or so X will restart, bringing me right back to kdm. This does not happen if I choose to use Fluxbox. I like Fluxbox, but very much prefer KDE. Any ideas? Im thinking that KDE is crashing.. Is there a log for KDE somewhere? In addition, i have ran kde apps and kicker through fluxbox without error.-- Cheers,Ian
Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?
2006/4/30, Benno Schulenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sunday, April 30 2006 22:52, wu chuanwen wrote: http://www.linuxsir.org/bbs/showthread.php?t=252747 I don't think it'd be much help posting a Chinese forum thread in an English mailing list. I just mean to show that many people don't think firefox is so good But most of the people here can't read what's written there: for all we know they could be singing the praises of spaghetti. :) It's my fault.I didn't consider it much. Maybe, though, your Firefox gets slow because of the Chinese (?) characters? Have you tried visiting only English sites for a while? I don't think that is becaust my Chinese characters.It seems better now for the advices from Alexander Skwar and Andrea Barisani(nice man). In fact,i usually visit the English sites(you know,in China,linux is not so flourish yet although more and more people join this group. And if it's caused by bad or heavy use of Javascript, also try avoiding the sites you usually visit, hop around on gentoo.org and similar sites, open lots of tabs and see what happens there. Benno -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- wcw -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Problems moving /boot partiton
On 4/30/06, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When this was complete I ran grub using the commands grub root (hd0,8) setup (hd0) quit My understand of the above is that the root (hd0,8) says place the second part of grub on /dev/sda9 (drive 0, partition 8) while the second says place the first part of grub in the MRB. Looks like you solved your problem, but I think I can briefly explain what the above commands really mean: root (hd0,8): In this context, this tells grub that it can find the files required for installation on the first drive, 9th partition. This partition should contain [/boot]/grub/stage1 [/boot]/grub/stage2, [/boot]/grub/grub.conf, and also a stage1_5 for the filesystem. setup (hd0): This tells grub to install itself onto the first hard drive. Normally it writes the stage1 file to the MBR, and the stage1_5 to the blocks between the MBR and the start of the first partition. It also records the size of the stage1_5 and the root device (hd0,8) in the MBR. This is done so that at boot, the stage1 is loaded by the BIOS and begins executing. That in turn loads the stage1_5 from the known physical location on the disk, and passes control to the stage1_5 loader. That in turn looks at the filesystem (since it understands how to read the filesystem) to load the stage2 and grub.conf files. When stage2 is executed, that is when you see the menu appear with the entries from the grub.conf. HTH, -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] hald issue
Folks; Just merged hal, dbus, and ivman. dbus starts, but hald does not and there is no hint in the /var/log/messages as to why. Running kernel 2.6.16 (kde-3.5.2) Starting hald gives the following output, but nothing else # /etc/init.d/hald start * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Starting Hardware Abstraction Layer daemon ... [ !! ] ivman cannot start cos it depends on a running hald Any clues to help solve this issue 'll be appreciated. Are there other easy to configure packages that offer the same functionality as ivman out there? TIA -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] KDE crashing on startup
On Monday 01 May 2006 04:09, Ian Kabeary wrote: Hi there, Im using a PPC arch., and noticed that upon selecting kde-3.5 from my freshly emerged kdm that after a minute or so X will restart, bringing me right back to kdm. This does not happen if I choose to use Fluxbox. I like Fluxbox, but very much prefer KDE. Any ideas? Im thinking that KDE is crashing.. Is there a log for KDE somewhere? maybe /var/log/kdm.log has something interessting. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Help emerging audacity
On Monday 01 May 2006 00:46, Ronald Vazquez wrote: Hello list: I just tried to emerge audacity and got the following error: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.6/../../../libwx_gtk2-2.4.so: undefined reference to `vtable for wxFileProto' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [../audacity] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/audacity-1.2.1/work/audacity-src-1.2.1/src' make: *** [audacity] Error 2 !!! ERROR: media-sound/audacity-1.2.1 failed. !!! Function src_compile, Line 75, Exitcode 2 !!! (no error message) !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. xwgtk is installed on the system: * x11-libs/wxGTK Latest version available: 2.6.2-r1 Latest version installed: 2.6.2-r1 The attachment has the complete (?) output of the emerge attempt. I would appreciate if anyone could point me in the the direction I should go. Thanks in advance, I'd try to recompile wxGTK-2.4.x emerge -a1 =x11-libs/wxGTK-2.4.2-r4 wxGTK is slotted (both 2.6 and 2.4 can be installed altogether), and audacity-1.2.1 needs 2.4. Ciao Francecso -- Linux Version 2.6.16-gentoo-r4, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Apr 26 06:59:58 CEST 2006 One 1GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 2GB RAM, 2007.31 Bogomips Total aemaeth -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list