We appear to be padding to 8 bytes rather than 16, not sure how that
happened. It should not affect us to change that (workbench doesn't care
what the alignment is on reading), so I will make it pad to a multiple of
16 bytes.
Tim
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Brett
Surface adjacency information is only available through gifti surface
files, as a list of triangles that make up the surface (each triangle has
three vertex indices). You can use wb_command -cifti-separate to get the
timeseries for full surfaces as a gifti metric file, which is easier to
match to
Sorry I didn't notice your comment about reverse engineering cifti, it is
intended to be an open format, we do have documentation here:
http://www.nitrc.org/projects/cifti/
In particular,
http://www.nitrc.org/plugins/mwiki/index.php/cifti:ConnectivityMatrixFileFormatsdetails
how things work in
You may be running into an unfortunate design problem in CIFTI-1, if
NiBabel expects them to be standard NIfTI-2 - the dimensions are backwards
in the header, so non-square matrices will have their elements rearranged.
You may be able to get matlab to fix them via a reshape with the dimensions
From the .dtd on https://www.nitrc.org/projects/gifti/, I see this:
Endian (BigEndian |
LittleEndian) #REQUIRED
From GIFTI_Surface_Format.pdf on the same site (which also echos the above
on page 7), it looks like line breaks are also implicitly forbidden:
The
The initial release of the CIFTI-2 XML parsing/manipulating/writing code is
available on the NITRC download page, http://www.nitrc.org/frs/?group_id=454.
It additionally supports CIFTI-1 XML, but note that supporting CIFTI-1
requires dealing with reversed dimensions in the NIfTI-2 header (CIFTI-2
To finally follow up on this, we have not made source code available yet,
but plan to with the next release (which will support CIFTI-2). Sorry
about the delay (both source code and reply).
Tim
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Glasser, Matthew glass...@wusm.wustl.eduwrote:
I think we can
As to your first question, it may currently be easier to use wb_command
-cifti-separate to get the different hemispheres and voxels (either by
structure or all in a single file) as separate GIFTI/NIFTI files. The
GIFTI files made this way have direct correspondence to vertices in the
relevant
You could try using wb_command -surface-geodesic-rois, it will draw
circular ROIs around vertices, as separate maps in a metric file. If you
want them all in one map, the -overlap-logic option to that command, and
the commands -metric-reduce, -metric-math and -metric-label-import may come
in
As per the announcement, yes, it does include the source (on github,
https://github.com/Washington-University/workbench, see releases for the
code matching the released binaries), with some basic instructions for
building (src/README - short version, we use cmake), a few tests of some
simple
If you have only one ROI, you could also look at
the -cifti-average-dense-roi command:
http://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command.php
Tim
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Glasser, Matthew
glass...@wusm.wustl.eduwrote:
To convert the output of -cifti-math to a label file, use
Sorry, didn't get the URL right:
http://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command.php?function=-cifti-average-dense-roi
Tim
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu wrote:
If you have only one ROI, you could also look at
the -cifti-average-dense-roi command
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 at 3:15 AM
To: Matt Glasser glass...@wusm.wustl.edu, Timothy Coalson
tsc...@mst.edu
Cc: Donna Dierker do...@brainvis.wustl.edu,
hcp-users@humanconnectome.org hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: RE: [HCP-Users] activation region mask
Thanks all for your
to it for it to be usable in
this case I think (and I think it should be added).
Matt.
From: Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu
Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 at 1:19 PM
To: Matt Glasser glass...@wusm.wustl.edu
Cc: Donna Dierker do...@brainvis.wustl.edu, Luo,Yishan
lys84...@hotmail.com, hcp-users
As some expansion on the preferences location, the organization we used
is brainvis.wustl.edu, on linux the file is here:
~/.config/brainvis.wustl.edu/Caret7.conf
Tim
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu wrote:
We use qt's preferences system, this describes where
I don't think we currently have a command to warp the fiber orientations
into a different space. It is possible in theory, and the matrix4 wouldn't
need to be regenerated, but the fiber drawing locations won't line up with
voxel centers anymore (this is cosmetic more than anything, but it bothers
time.
Tim
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Glasser, Matthew glass...@wusm.wustl.eduwrote:
How would one then average across subjects (if that is why they wanted
data in standard space)?
Matt.
From: Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu
Date: Friday, May 9, 2014 at 3:12 PM
To: Matt Glasser
(and then z-transform and average the connectomes across
subjects). There will be a better way in the future.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu
Date: Monday, May 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM
To: Ausaf Bari aus...@gmail.com
Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org hcp-users
Workbench currently doesn't have a way to do that. caret5 has a way to do
this (caret_command -surface-to-volume, and there is another method called
multi-fiducial mapping, though I'm not sure how to invoke it), though you
may need to do some file conversion.
On a side note, FSL's probtrackx
I believe we don't include those in the releases, because dense connectome
files are very large (~30GB each). You should be able to generate them by
running wb_command -cifti-correlate on a subject's rfMRI dtseries file.
Tim
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Ommen, Jurgen omme0...@stthomas.edu
could use to get the network. Is there maybe
a Matlab library available which is able to read .dconn.nii files?
Thanks again for your help,
Jürgen
*From:* Timothy Coalson [mailto:tsc...@mst.edu]
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 04, 2014 7:42 PM
*To:* Ommen, Jurgen
*Cc:* hcp-users
.
Many thanks again for your help,
Jürgen
*From:* Timothy Coalson [mailto:tsc...@mst.edu]
*Sent:* Friday, June 06, 2014 6:41 PM
*To:* Ommen, Jurgen
*Cc:* hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
*Subject:* Re: [HCP-Users] Brain Connectivity Matrices
First, a slight correction to my previous reply
To finally answer this, no, -wbsparse-merge-dense does not have any sparse
summation logic, it is meant only for the dense (brain models) dimension,
for concatenation. We don't currently have a command to do such a
summation, trajectory support is somewhat a work in progress.
I don't know why
To expand on the wb_command part, the released versions don't have a
friendly way to find that information, but that will be improved somewhat
in the next release - the -file-information command will print some
information from the XML in cifti files, including parcel names in cifti
index order
The inner and outer surfaces should be the white and pial surfaces to map
all of cortex (of the same vertex count as the midthickness, so not the
native surfaces). I believe we generally also use a volume mask to exclude
things like CSF and noisy voxels, but I'm not sure exactly what it masks
out
It isn't just a format conversion, it is a volume to surface mapping you
need to do. See the -volume-to-surface-mapping command for the ways that
wb_command can do this:
http://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command.php?function=-volume-to-surface-mapping
Tim
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014
-cifti-separate is probably what you want, if you want to use spatial
and/or surface neighbor information (because the indices in the metric
files will line up with the relevant surface files). Also, with the v1.0
release, the -file-information command will give you a quick summary of the
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Matthew George Liptrot
matthew.lipt...@di.ku.dk wrote:
Hi,
I am a novice at handling surfaces, and at using the Connectome
Workbench/commandline, so apologies if the following is obvious.
We want to be able to perform connectivity analysis of subjects
editing the HCP general pipeline but am getting stuck with
naming convention issues. Is there a script somewhere else that I might
have missed?
Thanks,
Konrad
On 17 Oct 2014, at 21:07, Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu wrote:
The command should (and for me, does) work without telling
Inline replies.
Tim
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Nomi, Jason jxn...@miami.edu wrote:
Dear Experts,
I am trying to use the workbench commands but cannot get them to work.
After opening the “wb_command” file in my linux terminal, I get the message
printed below.
Linux terminal? The
, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher (BCCL Lab)
Department of Psychology
University of Miami
5151 San Amaro Drive: Room 114A
Website: http://www.psy.miami.edu/bccl/
Email: jxn...@miami.edu
--
*From:* Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu
*Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2014 5:38
and areas of the vertices are the same for
all subjects?
Thanks again!
Ben
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu
wrote:
No, we do not have a precomputed file of geodesic distances, we compute
them on the fly in any operation that needs them. Using
You can do this on the surface for the cortex, you will probably want to
use -cifti-separate to get the left/right pieces as separate files, then
you can use -metric-math for difference/thresholding/masking/etc, and then
-metric-vertex-sum with an -integrate option to get an answer in terms of
Correct, it still produces a valid label file, even if it does sound rather
annoyed.
Side note, if it would have to go past _99 to resolve a name collision,
it instead gives up and throws an error. I figured, if your label names
collide that often, you must have done something you didn't mean to
?function=-cifti-separate
Tim
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Peka Savayan savay...@umn.edu wrote:
Hi Timothy Coalson,
Thank you for your response to my question.
Can you please give me examples, along with the specific Workbench
commands?
I would like to get unaveraged time series
The map name/number is not a label name, it is the map index or name that
you select in the overlays toolbox in the gui, use 1 and it will probably
give you what you want. A single map usually has multiple labels,
specifically all the ones that get displayed at the same time in the gui.
Tim
On
203 204 205 206 207
208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226
227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234
Anyway, the count of vertices per parcellated roi is good enough for my
purposes!
Thank you very much and best regards
OMD
*From:* Timothy Coalson
.
---
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu
From: Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu
Date
In the dlabel.nii file, this information is in the data matrix, not the
header. One way to get this information is from the header of a
ptseries.nii file (or other parcellated file type) resulting from
parcellating with it. The -file-information command should report the
counts of vertices
Those pieces of information reside in separate files. The mapping of what
area each vertex/voxel belongs to exists in the data of this cifti dlabel
file:
${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/MNINonLinear/fsaverage_LR32k/${Subject}.aparc.a2009s.32k_fs_LR.dlabel.nii
The various fMRI timeseries are in cifti
You can get cifti data into matlab fairly easily (I mention matlab because
you mentioned SPM, which uses matlab), see this FAQ entry:
https://wiki.humanconnectome.org/display/PublicData/HCP+Users+FAQ#HCPUsersFAQ-2.HowdoyougetCIFTIfilesintoMATLAB?
Depending on how your ROIs are specified, you may
As in my previous answer, the best way to get them into matlab is to pick
an option from this FAQ entry:
https://wiki.humanconnectome.org/display/PublicData/HCP+Users+FAQ#HCPUsersFAQ-2.HowdoyougetCIFTIfilesintoMATLAB?
In either case, you will need to install some toolboxes into matlab, and
you
fsl doesn't support CIFTI files yet. What you want for those is wb_command
-cifti-merge:
http://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command.php?function=-cifti-merge
Tim
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Farrant, Kristafor kxf...@miami.edu
wrote:
Thanks!
I should be able to use
with CIFTI.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Yizhou Ma maxxx...@umn.edu
Date: Sunday, March 1, 2015 at 9:27 PM
To: Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu
Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] projecting from volume to R440 template
(subcortical
We are going to need a bit more information than that, I don't know what
you mean by subcortical data is not separated from the surface, do you
mean that the cortex data is represented in voxels in the cifti file also?
You should be using the -left-metric and -right-metric options for the
surface
We need to know what format your data is currently in to give a definitive
answer, but I'm going to guess matlab, as we have provided code for it to
load cifti files, which you appear to have done. The matlab code we
provide also allows for saving data back out into cifti files, latest
version
Your data is RPI, but both label volumes are LPI. The -generic version
doesn't accept that either, the current labels must be in the same volume
space as the data. Maybe when you pulled the first volume off the data, it
changed something?
Use -volume-reorient to get them to match, and it works.
You can always get help for an individual command by running it without any
arguments, and you can list the commands and only a short description with
-list-commands. You can also browse the commands here:
http://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command.php
In this case, you will want
An additional note on downsampling: when using the ADAP_BARY_AREA surface
resampling, you do not need to smooth before downsampling (it will not lose
data that falls between the sampling points). However, with downsampling
volume data, the available methods do require some presmoothing to avoid
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:34 AM, Estrid Jakobsen ejakob...@cbs.mpg.de
wrote:
Dear all,
I've just downloaded the newly released corrected 468 group average
connectome file, HCP_S500_R468_MIGPd4500ROW.dconn.nii, and I have two
questions:
1. I would like to convert this file to a binary gifti
Back on this other question, wb_command indeed does not do decimation of
the remove vertices from existing topology variety. The usual way to do
surface downsampling with wb_command is to generate a new sphere with the
desired number of vertices (and highly regular topology/spacing), and then
topologies to the original ones or not?
If it is possible, how could it be achieved?
Cheers,
Denis
2015-05-19 0:57 GMT+02:00 Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu:
Back on this other question, wb_command indeed does not do decimation of
the remove vertices from existing topology variety
Setting the OMP_NUM_THREADS environment variable to 1 will make it use only
1 core.
Tim
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Daniel P. Bliss dbl...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi HCP Users,
There appear to be commands within PostFreeSurferPipelineBatch that use
multi-threading, because my call to this
Some operations in wb_command automatically use OpenMP without being
enabled by an argument, using however many cores it can find. You can
change the number it uses by setting the environment variable
OMP_NUM_THREADS. I'm not as sure about multithreading in other software
used in the scripts.
We have some example files here that cover each mapping type at least once:
http://www.nitrc.org/frs/?group_id=454
If this is the pull request you are starting from, the cifti files from it
appear to already be in it, search for ones and you will see 5 binary
files:
on
them, perhaps we should.
Tim
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Timothy Coalson tsc...@mst.edu wrote:
We have some example files here that cover each mapping type at least
once:
http://www.nitrc.org/frs
On one of the layers, click the yellow construction button, and choose add
overlay above or add overlay below.
Tim
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Longchuan Li leonad...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi, HCP users
Could someone tell me how I can display more than three layers of
functional activations
For data to be displayed on a logarithmic scale, we have had a small amount
of discussion of doing the log transform on the fly, though considering
that -*-math will do this easily with the main drawback being filesystem
use, it hasn't been a priority. As for faking it with a log-scale palette,
We recommend analyzing cortical data on surface representations, and this
is reflected in the formats we use for our released data, so files ending
in .nii.gz will generally not contain useful ROIs for this purpose, as they
are volume files.
We have cifti label
files,
I would agree that center of gravity doesn't seem all that useful a measure
of a parcel, which is why parcellated cifti files contain the information
of the entire ROI of each parcel. Note that the center of gravity may lie
significantly outside the surface if the ROI is large and covers
That command is meant for that purpose, yes, but you will first need to use
one of the -cifti-create-* commands to make a template cifti in the
downsampled space (you can use things like -surface-vertex-areas,
-volume-create, and -volume-affine-resample to get the needed inputs for a
The only thing -cifti-convert generally tries to preserve is the data
matrix, all the header info is not retained, and to convert it back, most
formats require a template cifti file that has the appropriate header
info. You can get the relevant header info with
the -cifti-export-dense-mapping
-cifti-convert is not intended to make files that will work nicely as
single-surface files, it is more of a hack for software that can't read
cifti yet:
-cifti-convertDUMP CIFTI MATRIX INTO OTHER FORMATS
The -cifti-separate command is how you take a structure from a cifti file
and
Additionally, if you generate a cortex-only parcellation, you shouldn't
need to put it into a volume to use it with the HCP CIFTI data. However,
I'm not sure how to get freesurfer to write GIFTI label files, and unless
you generate it on the fs_LR 32k mesh, you'll need to resample it (via
As further information, the example in that directory is very out of date,
as CiftiXMLReader is an older implementation (which doesn't support
cifti-2) that we haven't entirely replaced yet. Take a look at CiftiFile
instead for a more convenient interface that does support cifti-2. You can
also
The MEG data uses a different surface resolution than the MRI data, so the
MRI spec file and data cannot be visualized in the same instance of
workbench.
You were on the right track with what you did first, opening the *.surf.gii
and related MEG data files. You may need to switch the viewing
-cifti-separate can't do any averaging, that isn't its purpose. Instead,
you can use -cifti-stats and the roi of the amygdala to do such an average:
#what you already did, for the purpose of getting the ROI
wb_command -cifti-separate tfMRI_EMOTION_LR_Atlas.dtseries.nii COLUMN
-volume
then I figure that would get me the averaged time
> series.
>
>
> If that is not possible, I am unclear where the file in the second step,
> "tfMRI_EMOTION_LR_Atlas.dtseries.nii
> roi_left_amygdala.dscalar.nii", comes from.
>
>
> Thanks for the help -
>
;
> Thanks so much for the help!
>
>
>
> I have one final question:
>
>
> I assume that this ROI is from the freesurfer subcortical segmentation?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu>
> *Sen
>
> wb_command -cifti-stats 30_min.dtseries.nii -reduce MEAN -roi
> roi_left_amygdala.dscalar.nii
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for your patience on this Tim -
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 1, 2015
The code I am using for the second step:
>
> wb_command -cifti-create-dense-from-template 30_min.dtseries.nii
> roi_left_amygdala.dscalar.nii -volume AMYGDALA_LEFT
> roi_left_amygdala.nii.gz -from-cropped
>
>
>
> Any advice on what is happening?
>
> Jason
>
>
>
I don't suppose you're seeing NaNs specifically in matlab after using
ft_read_cifti? I don't know of anything else that is expected to add NaNs.
Could you do wb_command -cifti-reduce your dconn MEAN mean.dscalar.nii
and then do -file-information on that? If that shows NaNs, I suggest also
So, 2/3 of the spatial locations in HCP CIFTI files are not voxels, only
the cerebellum and subcortical structures are represented as voxels. I'm
not all that familiar with the structure that ft_read_cifti returns, but it
should have the information needed to translate between data matrix indices
I'm not clear on what you actually want to do. Timeseries are in the
.dtseries.nii file, not in the .dconn.nii file. How to use an ROI as a
mask depends on what you want to do with it, but you can use it to average
contained rows together with -cifti-roi-average.
You can get the closest vertex
wb_command -cifti-merge takes the output filename first, then you repeat
"-cifti " for each input file (which is why in the help the -cifti
option is marked as repeatable), in the order you want them concatenated.
The help information for -cifti-merge includes this example and explanation:
I don't know what the mat attribute is, as it doesn't seem to correspond to
anything that exists in a normal gifti surface file. The other two arrays
are the floating point coordinates of each vertex, and the sets of three
integer vertex indices that make the triangles between the vertices. I
CIFTI files store data on a combination of surface and volume
representations, so first you need to know (roughly) what structure the
thing you are looking for is on. Currently, the options are left cortex,
right cortex, and everything else is represented as voxels.
If all you have to start with
As you said, the voxels in cifti files are stored by their integer indices
as if they were in a volume file, so to get their location in space, you
need a transformation matrix, similar to the nifti sform. This is exactly
what the TransformationMatrixVoxelIndicesIJKtoXYZ element is. The simple
The -label-to-border command requires gifti label files, as it does one
surface at a time - there is not a cifti version of this command (because
border files are surface only and single hemisphere, and there is no
equivalent volume operation). So, first -cifti-separate to get gifti label
files:
Consider this command:
http://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command.php?function=-surface-closest-vertex
You can draw ROIs around the identified vertices on the surface with this
command:
http://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command.php?function=-surface-geodesic-rois
If your .csv file matches a particular .dlabel.nii file, what you could do
is use -cifti-parcellate to generate a template parcellated cifti file, and
then use -cifti-convert -from-text to put the data into that format (you
will need to strip off the labels first, leaving only the numbers, after
With a .sh file, you don't use "apt-get install", it is a script that you
run directly in a terminal:
tim@timsdev:~/Downloads$ ./aspera-connect-3.6.0.106805-linux-64.sh
Installing Aspera Connect
Deploying Aspera Connect (/home/tim/.aspera/connect) for the current user
only.
Restart firefox
:41 PM, Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> wrote:
> Creating any kind of raid array on a disk nearly always involves labeling
> the disk with the raid configuration, which probably overwrote the
> partition table (and is hidden from the exposed raid-0 "disk", causing the
>
rned about is not so much the labels for
> Key=0, but that some of the other vertices have different labels – see
> lines 22-27 below:
> A B
> 10 10
> 29 29
> 24 24
> 28 28
> 11 11
> 31 31
> 27 27
> 0 -1
> 13 13
> 15 15
> 35 35
> 35 35
I'm not sure what could have gone wrong in the script, but as you may have
guessed, that error means the input surface to -surface-apply-warpfield is
too large for the specified warpfield volume, and thus some vertices would
have undefined coordinates if it proceeded with the transformation.
Tim
/standard2acpc_dc.nii.gz
Pipelines_ExampleData/C10/T1w/T1w_acpc_dc_restore.nii.gz
And upload them here:
http://brainvis.wustl.edu/cgi-bin/upload.cgi
Tim
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> wrote:
> I'm not sure what could have gone wrong in the script, but as you
As a short-term fix, you could add an additional "../" to the start of
those paths, and it would likely find it (because the main thing that
appears wrong with the path is that "data" shows up twice). We have
identified a few troublesome aspects of spec file relative path handling
(especially
The .nii.gz files are nifti-1 volumes, while the .dtseries.nii files are
Cifti files. If you need spatial information, converting Cifti to nifti-1
is not the way to go about it, instead you could use wb_command
-cifti-separate into metric (.func.gii, one per hemisphere) and volume
files, or use
gt; On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Rose Tharail John <
> mailboxofr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> To get a dconn loaded in matlab, you of course n
If you are using -cifti-correlation, there is a -mem-limit option for this
purpose, so there isn't a required minimum memory to do it (even in matlab
where everything has to be in memory, the 90k x 4.8k timeseries input pales
in comparison to the 90k x 90k output). If you are doing everything in
The -cift-convert command is only files that are organized the way cifti is
- the data in question has to have already been in cifti space before using
the command will do anything for you. The nifti files written and accepted
by the command are "fake" nifti files, they only superficially
To get a dconn loaded in matlab, you of course need to have a large amount
of available memory. Freezing is what I would expect if you don't have
enough memory, and start using a lot of swap space (some ways of loading
might initially load it as double precision, and need twice the memory).
As
ine
> Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
> 660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
> St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu
>
> From: Joelle Zimmermann <joelle.t.zimmerm...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 2:40 PM
> To: Timothy Coalson <tsc...@
to get the color table. Is there a way I can
> save a border file with my own color table?
>
> Thanks,
> Cherry
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> wrote:
>
>> The -label-to-border command requires gifti label files, as it d
Sorry, the -*-label-export-table commands don't put the unlabeled key in
the text file. Use -file-information on them instead to check what key
value the "???" label is (it means the unlabled value).
Tim
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Thomas Nichols
wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to delve into this.
>
> wb_command does have surface to volume mapping now.
>>
>
> Just to be clear, which command are talking about? Using the output of
> wb_command
Yeah, that command should have the structure strings in the help info, I'll
add that.
However, I would not say that brainordinates inherently have an "exact
location" in terms of XYZ coordinates, they have different coordinates in
each subject. We try to register them so that the brainordinates
It is possible to get a center of gravity of a surface ROI, but it is more
involved (and doesn't result in a vertex). We don't really use ROI
centers, as the entire ROI is generally more informative. See:
https://www.mail-archive.com/hcp-users%40humanconnectome.org/msg02495.html
With the
Many of the executables and operations in the pipelines do not use
parallelization across cores within a single subject. You may be better
off setting up a queue with fewer cores available per slot, and submitting
many subjects at once to the queue. Make sure you set the queue name
correctly in
We do have -metric-erode now (and volume, label, cifti). You can also do
this more generally for any cifti file (for instance a custom grayordinate
space) by using the -roi options in -cifti-separate.
Tim
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Glasser, Matthew
wrote:
> You
1 - 100 of 547 matches
Mail list logo