Greetings!
Is there any possibility to view the ISMF log information? Sorry if I am
asking differently How to trace the ISMF activity ? Is it possible
to track ?
Thanks in advance. J
Regards,
Mani
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
Sounds like you're not looking in IBMLink. APARs are generally
released
to the public web interfaces once the APAR has closed. OA25468 is
open.
You're of course right. Stupid me!
Thanks
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
--
Michael,
You must be looking in a pre-z/OS V1.9 book.
Here is the section in 1.9 book http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/dgt2c860/2.5.5?
SHELF=EZ2ZO10K.bksDT=20070424113027 and then there is the z/OS
Migration book here http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
What specifically are you looking to trace? ISMF is an ISPF application, as
such it will have some ability to have ISPF trace some of its elements. If
you are looking to trace some of the functions for audit, you might be able
to turn audit on with your security product for the various facility
Hi List,
We are Z/OS 1.7 with Enterprise cobol 3.4 and SDK 1.4
I'm trying to run an OO Cobol program which invokes a Java method
and I'm having problems with the LE runtime option XPLINK
The compilation and linkage work find.
I'm trying to run the program using the BPXBATCH utility
with PGM
Hi,
I am not 100% sure, but I recall that coding //STEP1
PGM=JAVACALL,PARM='XPLINK(ON)' once worked for me.
I prefer a CEEUOPT Module linked with the application, similar like the SYSIN
below as input to assembler:
//SYSIN??? DD *
TITLE 'CEEUOPT'
CEEUOPT? CSECT
CEEUOPT? AMODE ANY
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/15/2008
at 11:04 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And if there are INCLUDE members with similar numbers?
The C/I should identify both the line number and the member.
I like HLASM's technique of an additional Informative message which
identifies the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/11/2008
at 10:37 AM, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Makes perfect sense to me. Under OS/360, we didn't have the protection
that CCW translation gives us today and it was incredibly easy to
destroy part of the OS
Not by pointing a CCW at it; storage
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/11/2008
at 06:50 PM, (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I don't know what VSAM-like access methods are.
ACB/RPL. That includes VTAM and access to SPOOL data sets. I believe that
JES2 still uses EXCPVR but JES3 uses STARTIO.
--
Shmuel
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/11/2008
at 04:58 PM, J R [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't think so. I remember writing code for OS/360 that, during early
testing, incorrectly calculated a buffer size requirement. Sure enough,
when a subsequent READ CCW tried to read into
beyond the end of the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/11/2008
at 05:38 PM, Gerhard Postpischil [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You had storage? All of our programmers had core, and
persisted in that usage even into the late seventies.
Yeah, but not all shops saved money by buying a 370/155 after the
370/158 had been
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/12/2008
at 11:39 AM, Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And, EXCP is an ordinary unauthorized interface. STARTIO and EXCPVR are
not.
Are you a betting man?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
BillD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Before SMS came along, it was a good idea to get all the space needed
in the first extent and allocate a 10-20% secondary for
contingencies. This was known to be more efficient.
Why? Why before SMS?
With older, real
Saw this on through the CNN.COM web site early today. This has got to be a
new low for outsourcing.
http://www.kitv.com/money/16607424/detail.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Matthew Stitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Saw this on through the CNN.COM web site early today. This has got to
be a
new low for outsourcing.
http://www.kitv.com/money/16607424/detail.html
What's new?
I know of much more work, that is sent
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:00:09 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/15/2008
at 11:04 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
And if there are INCLUDE members with similar numbers?
The C/I should identify both the line number and the member.
I like HLASM's technique of an
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Matthew Stitt wrote ...
Saw this on through the CNN.COM web site early today. This
has got to be a
new low for outsourcing.
http://www.kitv.com/money/16607424/detail.html
[snip]
Right on! Much better to put the locals on some kind of welfare
program, AND pay for the off-shore order-takers.
-jc-
I am somewhat confused by this as well. But I'll admit that I'm not an
economist. I'm a computer techie. But as more things are done far
away, that reduces the
Yes,,
I ordered a Leather Recliner from Costco 4 weeks ago, for my Mother's visit
from South Africa.
So, this weekend, I phoned the Customer Support help line and I was routed
to India. They requested my order number and did a computer look-up and
just read to me , what I could see on the
Well, it looks like SAS is pricing itself out of our range. Or
management is just doesn't think that we are getting our moneys worth or
...
Anyway, other than using HLASM or maybe shudder COBOL, anybody have
any suggestions how to easily do some ad hoc type SMF reporting? What
would be really
I will be out of the office starting 16/06/2008 and will not return until
18/06/2008.
Conclusion : Now we know that Lotus Notes can even send out of Office
messages for IBM from INDIA...Amazing stuff.
Why am I reposting ? Because I have software grease monkeys in the USA
that responds
Ron Glenn, thank you. I had already varied the target offline on the
other zos lpar, but the target was online to a VM system.The PPRC copy
now works.
Thanks for the assist!
Joel
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:17:38 -0500, Glenn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Joel,
I also have twin
John,
You might also consider using the Assembler DSECT mapping support that is
available in the
alphaWorks version of JZOS. With it, you can generate Java record mapping
classes from
Assembler DSECT and then process the records using a Java program.
See:
I see customers stampeding to SAS/PC (or whatever it's called).
Barry has some notes on how to get the SMF data up to the mickey-mouse
servers - even the PDBs I hear. If you pull from the PC end, all the
EBCDIC/ASCII, [big|small]- endian issues are resolved.
Must be cheap too ...
Have a look.
In a message dated 6/16/2008 9:51:37 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
download that to my PC and run Java against it. If necessary, I could
even develop and test the Java code on my PC and run the application on
the mainframe once it is working. (or use Co:Z to ship the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
I see customers stampeding to SAS/PC (or whatever it's called).
I keep telling myself I need to look closer at this . . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Programming_System
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 7:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
I'm being offered UR1 closure for an APAR. The description sounds just
like FIN closure. Is there a difference?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
Quoting McKown, John:
(or, in my group, at the doctor's).
Huh ???. You work for a place called HealthMarkets ...
Shouldn't the quack come to *YOU* (in your cubicle) as a perk of the job
???... g,d,r
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
If you can get the SMF data into a usable format and get it down to PCs, you
might try this R statistical/graphing package:
http://www.r-project.org/
/Tom Kern
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:51:12 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it looks like SAS is pricing itself out of our
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Kern
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
If you can get the SMF data into a usable format and get it
down
From ServiceLink User's Guide Document Number SH52-0300-10 September
1996, as found in VM IBMLink:
Appendix B.1 APAR Closing Codes
The APAR closing codes are:
ADM A
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:52:03 -0500, Thomas Kern wrote:
If you can get the SMF data into a usable format and get it down to PCs, you
might try this R statistical/graphing package:
http://www.r-project.org/
And:
From: Longnecker, Dennis
I have a hard time reading the documentation too. I think it was written by
statisticians for statisticians. Maybe if some really high-powered people
who know how to do this kind of data manipulation/statistics were to start
working in R or W and made some sample code public, then the rest of us
- Original Message -
From: Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:36 AM
Subject: UR1 vs FIN
I'm being offered UR1 closure for an APAR. The description sounds just
like FIN closure. Is there a difference?
Ed,
It's better
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:51:12 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it looks like SAS is pricing itself out of our range. Or
management is just doesn't think that we are getting our moneys worth or
...
Anyway, other than using HLASM or maybe shudder COBOL, anybody have
any
Brian Peterson wrote:
FIN Fixed in next release
UR1 Programming error in the reported release; the problem has been
corrected in a release not yet available from distribution
Sounds like UR1 means something to the effect that the problem has actually
been fixed in an announced
John,
Buying single user licenses is probably the most expensive way to get SAS
for Windows. If you have 5 people that will use SAS then get a five user
license.
If a single user license is all the budget can take, then a method I use
with my team is to load SAS for Windows onto a fairly heavy
Anton,
Would you feel better if a call centre in Texas gave you the same kiss-off?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anton Britz
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 7:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN]
Hi Ron,
Yes, because the Viagra Stimulus Checks would then stimulate your own
Economy, taxes, roads etc. (Check the mess Arnie is in currently.. Budget
deficit wise but yes, I saw his wife on the Tim Russert show yesterday, talking
from Sun Valley.. Ever been in Sun Valley ? )
Alternatively,
In my experience, the difference is normally this:
UR1 is used for changes that are regarded as new function or some kind
of improvement or enhancement that was not technically a programming
error (close code PER) because the program was implementing what the
programming specification had said
Roger Bolan wrote:
FIN means fixed in next, but this does not absolutely guarantee
that there will be a next release. That's why you might have heard it
as fixed IF next. It's generally used for certain kinds of changes
that are only allowed to happen on a release boundary (like a
I keep telling myself I need to look closer at this . . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Programming_System
Yes, but.
Neither MXG, nor (neu)MICS, support WPS.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
In addition to Bob's update, I was told the same thing offline. Fixed If
Next.
Roger Bolan
infoprint.com
Boulder, Colorado, USA
P Think before you print
Robert Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
06/16/2008 12:24 PM
Please respond to
IBM
As part of the PCI audit we need to look into adopting NTP (network time
protocol) on the mainframe to ensure all of our 'systems' are
synchronized. Can STP provide NTP client capability to maintain 'same
time' across heterogeneous platforms. Hopefully, some one out there has
a solution. I'll
Matthew Stitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Saw this on through the CNN.COM web site early today. This has got
to
be a
new low for outsourcing.
http://www.kitv.com/money/16607424/detail.html
C.P. Vernooy posted on June 16, 2008 8:29 AM
What's new?
Chauhan, Jasbir wrote:
As part of the PCI audit we need to look into adopting NTP (network time
protocol) on the mainframe to ensure all of our 'systems' are
synchronized. Can STP provide NTP client capability to maintain 'same
time' across heterogeneous platforms. Hopefully, some one out there
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 2:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
As part of the PCI audit we need to look into
Hello,
I'm running a batch job that does a FTP transfer from a z/OS mainframe to a
LINUX server and the transfer rate is about 20K/sec. If I do the same FTP
transfer to a Windows server I got a transfer rate of about 900K/sec. The
mainframe OSA card is running at 100 Mb/sec full. Since the
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:41:40 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Yes, but.
Neither MXG, nor (neu)MICS, support WPS.
snip
Not yet.both Merrill and CA have announced they have current WPS
initiatives. And Dr. Merrill's RD team has taken it a step further
integrating
some
We have been trying to upgrade the LMU/LCU on our STK9310 ( PowderHorn )
ATL to support STK9840D tape drives. We currently have microcode level
1.9.26 on the LMU's and we have microcode level 4.2.04 on the LCU's.
For the 2nd weekend we attempted to upgrade the microcode level to 1.9.74
on
From Longnecker, Dennis
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 10:33 AM
I keep telling myself I need to look closer at this . . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Programming_System
This product is now marketed by IBM. In 2005 Barry Merrill started
testing his MXG code against the WPS
--snip--
Well, it looks like SAS is pricing itself out of our range. Or
management is just doesn't think that we are getting our moneys worth or ...
Anyway, other than using HLASM or maybe shudder COBOL, anybody have
any suggestions how to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
[snip]
Let me point out that PL/1 lends itself very nicely to
Hello everybody,
recently, as our production LPARs apetite for CPU has grown meaningful
(we are in process connecting succesive branches of bank to new application),
our sysprogs decided to simply put online subsequent processors to this LPARs.
We ended in 12 processors assigned to each of them.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I had imagined the TMP interposed its own filter behind BSAM/QSAM.
Educate me: How, outside the TMP, can one code a call to BSAM or
QSAM to perform folding? Is there something line DCB=(OPTCD=FOLD)?
You can't. No, there isn't. OPEN device-dependent code itself will
We had a similar problem and found it was related to port 113 and firewalls.
We had the ftp server on a Linux box and were using the client from z/OS. We
ended up creating a rule to keep the Linux ftp server from sending to port 113
of the client. Port 113 has something to do with identd.
Pawel, it's hard to advise on that unless you give us some more hints
about your configuration...
e.g LPAR setup, software and hardware models etc.
Just for starters it's entirely reasonable to consider that a logical
12-way might find inside one processor book of a z9 S54.
Martin
Martin
It's not the ability to map SMF data that counts here - for anyone
considering doing this in a programming language other than SAS (or indeed
replacing ANY commercial SMF analysis product). It's the intellectual
capital involved in knowing what to do with the data.
So I, personally, wouldn't
From: Pawel Leszczynski
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:18 PM
Hello everybody,
recently, as our production LPARs apetite for CPU has grown meaningful
(we are in process connecting succesive branches of bank to new
application),
our sysprogs decided to simply put online subsequent
Usually we don't choose to move away from good products like SAS or from 3rd
party performance monitors. It is usually a Management decision to lower
costs at any cost that forces us to go back to basic analysis/reporting,
often done in freebie languages (FORTRAN-G, PL/I-F, Rexx, etc)
And
Have you considered DFSORT and ICETOOL?
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [mailto:snip]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
I would love to try C or PL/I. But all we have are HLASM and COBOL. Oh,
and the current
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 4:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
Have you considered DFSORT and ICETOOL?
I don't know how to
So I, personally, wouldn't recommend moving away from products that manipulate
the data.
The OP doesn't want to move.
He has been 'told' to move.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
I seem to have forgotten how to do this, and I cannot seem to find the
answer in the docs or via Google.
I want to group by using two columns which are year() and month(), but
the result set isn't grouping.
For example:
Select Year(Expdate), Month(Expdate) ,
Category, Sum(Expamt)
And, also, consider the analytic data processing requirement for summary-
level reports, both on-the-fly from your detail and and also with using a
permanent trending data base of some type. An underlying database engine /
technology would need to be factored into any replacement initiative,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 4:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DB2 group by with date functions
I seem to have forgotten how to do this, and I cannot seem to find
If you post a message with DFSORT and SMF in the title, I'll Frank will
respond with some suggestions if not a complete example.
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [mailto:snip]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 2:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
I
Thanks John. That's exactly what I thought, then I started doubting myself
when I couldn't get it to work.
Select Year(Expdate), Month(Expdate), Category, sum(expamt)
from EXP.EXPENSES
group by Year(Expdate),
Yeah, I read about that last year. It's not only McDonalds that is doing
this.
Gary Green
I can use all the help I can get with my fight against cancer!
Please support my efforts!
Thank you.
http://www.active.com/donate/tntsonj/tntsonjGGreen
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Ok, this is getting weird. Right out of the example:
SELECT SUBSTR(WORKDEPT,1,1), MIN(EDLEVEL), MAX(EDLEVEL)
FROM DSN8910.EMP
GROUP BY SUBSTR(WORKDEPT,1,1) ;
All:
How do I go about cloning part of a HFS file system across LPARs? What I am
trying to do is to copy part (one directory and all sub-directories) from one
HFS file on one LPAR into an HFS file on another LPAR.
The HFS file containing the desired directories is mounted as root on one
There isn't one - the fine manual (from V8) says
grouping-expression cannot include any of the following items:
| A correlated column
| A host variable
| A column function
| Any function that is nondeterministic or that is defined to have | an
external action
| A scalar fullselect
| A CASE
Barry A Schwarz wrote on 06/16/2008 02:15:19 PM:
If you post a message with DFSORT and SMF in the title, I'll Frank will
respond with some suggestions if not a complete example.
-Original Message-
From: McKown, John [mailto:snip]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 2:03 PM
To:
Thanks, Mike. So using Group by year(xx) is something new in V9 it seems.
Funny, though, I instinctively tried that syntax first and was surprised it
didn't work.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Bell
Sent: 17.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 1:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts)
snip
6) A new parameter on
I don't believe this is quite correct. SUBSTR(), YEAR() and MONTH() are not
column functions, they are scalar functions. I believe the problem may be that
you cannot even use SCALAR functions in the GROUP BY unless you are in version
8 NEW FUNCTION MODE. Check to see if your site is on
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
06/15/2008
at 09:07 PM, John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The above inserts the comma between (e.g) TOM and DICK. Suppose that I
need a PARM of 80 characters which contains no commas anywhere in it?
Then you run it out to column 71[1], put a continuation character
what version of NCS are you on ?
- ravi.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:27:15 -0500, Glenn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We have been trying to upgrade the LMU/LCU on our STK9310 ( PowderHorn )
ATL to support STK9840D tape drives. We currently have microcode level
1.9.26 on the LMU's and we have
On 16 Jun 2008 13:16:44 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 3:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: replacing SAS for SMF reports?
We are currently running HSC/MVS R6.1. We have also installed the STK
recommanded PTFs that were suppose to provide the support of the
STK9840D tape drives.
I should have mentioned that we are using COAX attachment to the
STK/LMU's ( we have a Dual LMU configuration ) via twin VISARA SCON-22L
One license and Remote Desktop? Surely you have a under utilized
Intell server some where in the machine room :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 8:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
One license and Remote Desktop? Surely you have a under utilized Intell server
some where in the machine room :)
And, then you get into a server vs a desktop licence!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:14:52 -0400, François Paré
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I'm running a batch job that does a FTP transfer from a z/OS mainframe to a
LINUX server and the transfer rate is about 20K/sec. If I do the same
...
I thought I had responded to this but I guess it went into the bit
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:24:08 -0400, Robert Wright wrote:
OA25428, for example, let current IPCS developers know that a
developer 14 years ago made a data entry field on one panel two
characters too narrow to accept the widest item that can properly be
entered there. Hopefully, a lot of these
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:10:51 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chauhan, Jasbir
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 2:03 PM
As part of the PCI audit we need to look into adopting NTP
(network time
protocol) on the mainframe to ensure all of
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:56:33 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
06/15/2008
at 09:07 PM, John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The above inserts the comma between (e.g) TOM and DICK. Suppose that I
need a PARM of 80 characters which contains no commas anywhere in it?
Ted,
For Windows it is nothing to do with the Hardware Platform - server or desktop,
but rather the version of the OS you are using. Windows XP and VISTA are
regarded as desktop products and pricing is based on that. Win 2003 is a server
product and you will be charged a server price. This is
Anton,
I can't sit in the senate. I've been a foreigner in every country I've lived
in for the last 15 years. Best I can manage here is to be the Guvna.
I'd be more than happy for my nieces and nephews in Australia and the
Philippines to have a job in a call centre for a US company as they
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:25:07 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is a possibility as well and is being discussed. But then we'd need
a license for every desktop user (well, that's only 5 of us). But if
person#1 does the work most of the time, then it would be difficult for
person#2
90 matches
Mail list logo
