Hi,
Our CICS gut would like to use CICS facility to open a remote web page using
https. This requires setting up SSL.
Where can I find the information for setting up SSL?
I am running z/OS 1.7
TIA
Gadi
--
For
Hello Gadi,
Start with IP Configuration Guide (appendix B) by creating Keys. in 1.7 there
is a started task SSLSERV (look at GSK.SGSKSAMP(GSKSRVR). Book name is F1A1BK61
in library reader.
Itschak
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
From:Clark Morris wrote:
I believe that MFT and MVT went unsupported in 1977. My shop ran
unsupported until the 1980's (Westinghouse Lamp Divisions, yes the
plural is accurate for at least some of the period). Due to water on
our mod 65 we also ran MVT on a 4341.
1977 sounds earlier
I have been running ShowZOS 714 on a 1.4 system without any problems,
and it was assembled on a 1.7 system.
I guess I have been lucky !
But I think I should get the fix for this release to prevent any
problems in the future
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi all,
does somebody know whether C routine running above the line (both RMODE
AMODE) may get a memory under the line without using any assembler code?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Russell,
You don't give up, but the battle is lost. g
I know many sites with unsupported CPCs. Unsupported at all. I also know companies which provide HW support for IBM CPCs. Even IBM doesn't know about installed CPCs. Even IBM doesn't know about real usage of cold backup machines. Even IBM does
Focussing on the client site administrator aspect, things that
used to annoy me were
- Licence expiration warnings that modified return codes in
production batch jobs
- Licence expiration warnings that went unnoticed
- The variety of expiration warning messages being issued
- The variety of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Doesn't anybody know what accountability is, anymore?
In the US it seems to be politically incorrect. Since we all are
products of our environments, it's obviously somebody else's fault
whenever we do
Doesn't anybody know what accountability is, anymore?
In the US it seems to be politically incorrect. Since we all are products
of our environments,
it's obviously somebody else's fault whenever we do something wrong.
It's getting that way in Canada, as well.
(8-{}
-
Too busy driving to
Doesn't anybody know what accountability is, anymore?
when i win on ACCOUNT of my ABILITY to blame someone else
This is Chris Hoelscher and I approved this message!
Chris Hoelscher
Senior IDMS DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-476-2538
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information transmitted
Hi,
Is there a separate zLinux listserver or forum at your knowledge?
We are going to start investigating DB2 Connect on z/Linux IFL.
Jan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Jan
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Regards
Gerard Ceruti
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: 19 February 2007 02:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: zLinux listserver?
Hi,
Is there a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/17/2007
at 04:18 PM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ted, if you haven't gotten why the trust model is inadequate from my
past posts, and David Cole's, and Dave Salt's, and Russell Witt's,
then my explaining it again probably won't do the trick either.
Which
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/17/2007
at 11:41 AM, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The silver bullet would be a magic decoder ring on the HMC that says
this can run and this can't.
That doesn't solve the problem for either the customer or the vendor.
Consider DR.
--
Shmuel (Seymour
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/17/2007
at 07:27 AM, David Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
From a user's perspective, if the ISV is timely in his delivery of
license keys, why is it a big deal?
That's the wrong question. How can the user *know* that the ISV will
*always* be timely in his delivery of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/16/2007
at 04:22 PM, Bruno Sugliani [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But we don't care ( sorry about that ) about the sharks robbing the
poor salesmen
I wouldn't go that far. I certainly care more about being able to use
the software I pay for than I do with whether someone
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/17/2007
at 10:40 AM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We jointly discovered that our common distributor had stolen tens of
thousands of dollars from us
Was it Ronald Reagan who said trust, but verify?
He quoted an old Russian saying.
Even if a more
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/17/2007
at 06:52 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It might help if the installation process prompted for an E-mail
address of contact to notify automatically prior to expiry. Less
help on z/OS than on other systems, because z/OS has less consistent
a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/16/2007
at 01:54 PM, Ed Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there a better procedure than this for dealing with the flood,
Do E K,1 one time and then use the retry key. It's still a lot of
typing, but it eliminates some keystrokes and doesn't make you
redefine a PFK.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 02/16/2007
at 03:00 PM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
CA's EKG code for disaster testing is fairly nice.
The code may be nice, but that doesn't help if you can't get a new key
in a timely fashion. Have they fixed the problems that they were
having half a decade
My wife went from a DR Coordinator to a math teacher. You would not
be wondering about this if you heard what is going on in the schools.
No accountability at all. No responsibility, it is always someone
else's fault, or it's not fair. Considering the emotional cripples
I see turned out of the
Have you looked __malloc24() in the z/OS C++ Library reference manual?
Arie Kremer wrote:
Hi all,
does somebody know whether C routine running above the line (both RMODE
AMODE) may get a memory under the line without using any assembler code?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 12:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 02/16/2007
at 03:00
well, given the current state of affairs, why should we expect kids to have
any accountability whatsoever?
After all, they see their parents getting the shaft at work by corporate
america that sends jobs overseas without a second thought, without giving a
about the american worker, yea,
In a message dated 2/19/2007 8:02:36 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That doesn't solve the problem for either the customer or the vendor.
Consider DR.
Seems like if RSA cards are portable between cell phones should be able to
specify a backup decoder ring-waving
Beware, many FDA regulated companies must keep SMF records for many,
many years.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Anyone out there using EMC disks and managing the mirroring with GDPS?
We are about to migrate away from IBM ESS Disks managed by GDPS to EMC
DMX3000 disks managed by GDPS. We are told it works as the DMX emulates
PPRC but we are interested in anyone who is actually doing it.
Peter Gammage
Hi, All,
Yesterday we rolled out z/OS 1.7 to a Production LPAR previously running
z/OS 1.5, and have noticed a change in the archiving of batch job output
in CA-View. With 1.5, all jcl-type output (JESMSGLG, JESJCL, JESYSMSG
together with SYSPRINT, SYSOUT, etc.) was archived in CA-View as a
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:02:38 -0500, Reda, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
We offer multiple ways for the customer to install and maintain their
license keys. The recommended method is having the keys in a sequential
data set. This way modifications to the license keys can be as easy as
In a recent note, Dave Salt said:
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:24:44 +
In an edit session, enter EDSET on the command line. You'll see a panel with
Thanks! Works great for Edit and View.
And an unexpected bonus: I see I can turn off Confirm Cancel.
And everything sticks between
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:21:21 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
Yesterday we rolled out z/OS 1.7 to a Production LPAR previously running
z/OS 1.5, and have noticed a change in the archiving of batch job output
in CA-View. With 1.5, all jcl-type output (JESMSGLG, JESJCL,
I realize this is heresy, but I like the way CA does it. Parts of it, anyway.
We get warnings before a key expires. Once we get a new key, we add it to our
options file in Common Services (formerly CA-90's, etc.) and rerun CAS9 -- no
pain, no downtime.
I have no problem with vendor
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:40:13 -0500
It might help if the installation process prompted for an E-mail
address of contact to notify automatically prior to expiry. Less
help on z/OS than on other systems, because z/OS has less
From: Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I think you are correct about the SERNO field. I have a tool which
can modify the field, so I will try to run a test.
This is how the VTOCIX was listed using IEHLIST:
-DATA SET NAME--- CREATED DATE.EXP FILE TYPE SMS.IND EXT DS.VOL1
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:21:21 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
[ snip ]
We are at a loss to explain why this segregation of jcl stuff
into
separate CA-View members is occurring. We understand that z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives
are there?)
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz
Dave Cole writes emails as well as he writes software. But a small
reinforcement.
Trust?
A while back I worked for an ISV and was responsible for the code
program for what was then the number one product on both total sales and
velocity for the company. A Very Large Computer User (VLCU)
We have VIEW R11 running on our 1.8 system.
If I put an S beside the jobname I get it all in one file. If I put a ?
I get the individual pieces - just like SDSF does.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent:
Hi,
Something cool I learned at SHARE. I didn't notice this as we have been
using Thruput Manager to replace the Mellon Mods functionality for a
long time but there is some interesting useful function in some recent
JES2 sample exits. Look at SYS1.SHASSAMP members HASX54A, HASX04A,
HASX20B,
If we only dealt with 1 ISV, then we'd have few, perhaps no, problems
too. But we deal with (at the last count) 57 ISVs, who supply us with
several hundred products. Each ISV has it's idiosyncracies, some don't
use keys at all, some are very easy to contact and deal with, some
others are less so.
This is where Charles' idea shows merit. A unified license key scheme could
avoid some of the pain associated with the subject.
Jon
snip
If we only dealt with 1 ISV, then we'd have few, perhaps no, problems
too. But we deal with (at the last count) 57 ISVs, who supply us with
several hundred
-snip--
Considering the emotional cripples I see turned out of the elite and
prestigious all girls Catholic school my wife teaches at, it is no
wonder that this nonsense is prevalent.
--unsnip
Not to
Here is the JCL I have used before.
//*
//TSO EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
//SHOWMVS DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD *
---snip---
Since we all are products of our environments, it's obviously
somebody else's fault whenever we do something wrong.
--unsnip--
.About that Mojave Beachfront property I've got for
sale...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives are
there?)
John,
We migrated to the key data
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2096588,00.asp
Opinion: Despite having long since lost its star status in the view
of many IT watchers, the mainframe is showing continued growth and is
beginning to claim a new generation of users.
I try to stay away from clichés. But try as you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 11:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Sued
---snip---
Since we all are products of our
David Cole wrote:
RPOs, POs and invoices are all necessary parts of the A-P process,
and the better a vendor understands, cooperates with and *assists* in
the process, the more often:
- The licensing will be renewed on time,
- Payment will be made on time,
- And licensing keys
Arie Kremer wrote:
Hi all,
does somebody know whether C routine running above the line (both RMODE
AMODE) may get a memory under the line without using any assembler code?
In Systems/C - you can do it with a call to the __malloc24() function.
- Dave Rivers -
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19 Feb 2007 09:30:33 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
Since we all are products of our environments, it's obviously
somebody else's fault whenever we do something wrong.
--unsnip--
.About that Mojave Beachfront property I've
Jon, I agree with you. CA's license key method is about as painless
as I have seen.
One gripe I have is with a different vendor, (SAS, are you listening?).
I got my SAS key and applied it to my production LPAR but got busy and
forgot to apply it to the sandbox. Several months later I needed
IBSYS was the operating system of the IBM 7094 and probably the 7090 7070
7074. (36 bit word machine)
There was an early version(s) of OS that ran on the 7094.
The original production version of OS was PCP (primary control
program?). It was used on the 360/75 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
For a few weeks now I have had a problem with my HSM RECYCLE ML2
F HSM,RECYCLE ML2EXECUTE
ARC0830I RECYCLE COMMAND PROCESSING STARTING
IEF244I HSM HSM - UNABLE TO ALLOCATE 1 UNIT(S) 300
AT LEAST 1 OFFLINE UNIT(S) NEEDED.
IEF877E HSM NEEDS 1 UNIT(S) 301
FOR HSM SYS41934
FOR VOLUME
Kurt Talman wrote:
IBSYS was the operating system of the IBM 7094 and probably the 7090 7070
7074. (36 bit word machine)
There was an early version(s) of OS that ran on the 7094.
Two corrections:
o Strike IBM 7070 and 7074; they were very different, business not
scientific machines;
My apologies to Kirk Talman for rechristening him Kurt without
authlorization.
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA
_
Mortgage rates as low as 4.625% - Refinance $150,000 loan for $579 a month.
Intro*Terms
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: HSM recycle puzzle
For a few weeks now I have had a problem with my HSM RECYCLE ML2
F
It is very posssible that despite the fact that there appears to be several
drives available, they may really be allocated to someone who has specified
unit=(tape,,defer) This would allocate a drive but defer a mount until open
is issued. Just because you don;t see a tape on it, doesn't mean
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:04:04 -0800, Michael Cleary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add Virtual SMF Records
001 001 - Virtual APFLST
001 002 - Virtual LNKLST
001 003 - Virtual LOADPARM
001 004 - Virtual LPALST
001 005 - Virtual Master Catalog
001 006 - Virtual PAGE
001 007 -
In a recent note, Rick Fochtman said:
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:09:55 -0600
Not to mention the intellectual paralytics coming from our public and
private schools. Like a McDonalds clerk here that doesn't know half a
dozen from six chicken McNuggets!
A truly sorry state of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tony Harminc
[ snip ]
Now as an ISV employee, I see many Fortune 500 companies that
have A-P departments who, as a matter of policy, push the
limits much further, and more often.
You could probably attribute
PRIVAT means it wants a scratch tape. The -1 is really part of the
next line.
Eg - 1 OFFLINE, NOT ACCESSABLE 0593 is really one message.
What is the UNITNAME in HSM set up like? Does it only include device
0593? That would be my first guess.
SETSYS
UNITNAME(TAPELIB5)
In HCD TAPELIB5 is
On 19 Feb 2007 10:40:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John)
wrote:
Indeed, that was the main reason cited by a former employer for
refusing to implement direct deposit of payroll checks. They budgeted
the projected interest they would earn during the float period between
us cashing or
In a recent note, Tony Harminc said:
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:40:20 -0500
I think a decoupling of the keys issue and the payments is called for, and
indeed in the real world this happens much of the time.
IOW, the key is renewed whether you pay or not?
Perhaps the A-P policy
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:57:04 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:21:21 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
[ snip ]
We are at a loss to explain why this segregation of jcl stuff
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives
are there?
In a recent note, Tony
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
[ snip ]
Okay... another idea. Did someone change the JESLOG=NOSPIN
to SPIN for the execution class the job(s) ran in?
No; JESLOG= is not specified at all, and the manual says the default is
NOSPIN.
It depends on which FINDMOD. There are at at least 2, one of which is mine
(CBT FILE 434) that must run under ISPF in batch.
Example:
//FINDMOD JOB
//
//ALOCPROF EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:56:39 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
[ snip ]
Okay... another idea. Did someone change the JESLOG=NOSPIN
to SPIN for the execution class the job(s) ran in?
No;
Yes, I would say it is. A dozen eggs, a dozen doughnuts, etc.
snip
But is dozen sufficiently prevalant that that it's necessarily
considered part of literacy?
/snip
Jon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
many thanks
On 2/19/07, Kirk Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you looked __malloc24() in the z/OS C++ Library reference manual?
Arie Kremer wrote:
Hi all,
does somebody know whether C routine running above the line (both RMODE
AMODE) may get a memory under the line without using any
Getting OT here but my experience managing a SW company was that direct
deposit EASILY paid for itself by not having employees running to the bank
on payday. Let's say you pay someone $80K/year. That's roughly $40/hour, and
roughly $3077 per pay bi-weekly pay period.
30 minute run to the bank:
I think what we are hearing is that my earlier suggestion that maybe the
problem is your AP department was not a red herring after all.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:53
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:56:39 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
[ snip ]
Okay... another idea. Did someone
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
Yes, I would say it is. A dozen eggs, a dozen doughnuts, etc.
But those entities usually come in a single container, with no explicit
connection between the term dozen and the quantity 12.
Consider a box
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/18/2007
at 08:54 AM, Eric N. Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IFAPRDxx really isn't a key. You have to turn it on for each product
to use it, but there is no key that only works on your CPU. I'm not
sure just what IBM's reasoning behind IFAPRD is,
Presumably
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/19/2007
at 06:22 PM, Ken Brick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Last DOS/VS R35 probably 1982 to be followed by the VSE series
(probably when the 4331/4341 become available)
Yes; DOS/VSE was announced concurrently with ECPS:VSE, which was
initially only available on the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
02/18/2007
at 08:24 PM, Patrick Mulvany [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MVS - Mainly missing clarification of the 1960-1972 period
http://www.oshistory.net/metadot/index.pl?id=2238;isa=Category;op=show
There are some serious errors.
First, while OS/360 derived some concepts
TOS/360, as noted above, is essentially the same as DOS/360.
Only if a tape is essentially the same as a disk!
TOS's code base was largely common with DOS, and the programming APIs were a
subset -- but the SYSRES was on tape! Believe it or not. The equivalent of
an S806 took about ten minutes:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:33:26 -0500 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/18/2007
: at 08:54 AM, Eric N. Bielefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:IFAPRDxx really isn't a key. You have to turn it on for each product
:to use it, but there is no key that only
FYI, the new TRSMAIN supports spanned records so you can TERSE your SMF
data! Grab it at ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/s390/mvs/tools/packlib/
Regards,
Tom Conley
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Did it not support before - ?
customers send me there smf data since years with trsmain .
So it is not new - or miss i something ?
Frank
From: Pinnacle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TRSMAIN now supports spanned records
FYI, the new TRSMAIN supports spanned records so you can TERSE your SMF
data!
I'm wondering the same thing. Customers send us SMF data routinely in Terse
format.
On 2/19/07, Frank Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did it not support before - ?
customers send me there smf data since years with trsmain .
So it is not new - or miss i something ?
Frank
--
Mark Pace
On 19 Feb 2007 07:59:00 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: License keys for ISV
On 19 Feb 2007 10:08:45 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
IBSYS was the operating system of the IBM 7094 and probably the 7090 7070
7074. (36 bit word machine)
I think you mean 7040 (there may have been a 7044). The 707x series
was based on a 10 decimal digit word.
There was an early
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:22:08 +0200, Binyamin Dissen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does IBM custom build the IFAPRD** for each customer?
Or are most products turned off, requiring the customer to activate those that
were licensed?
A sample IFAPRDxx comes pre-customized with ServerPac based on your
See below...
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Does IBM custom build the IFAPRD** for each customer?
Yes. Every z/OS ServerPac or CBPDO order includes a custom-built
IFAPRDxx member.
Or are most products turned off, requiring the customer to activate those that
were licensed?
So far as I know,
Hi Tom,
Re. you saying:
the new TRSMAIN supports spanned records so you can TERSE your SMF
data! Grab it at ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/s390/mvs/tools/packlib/
De TRSMAIN homepage
http://techsupport.services.ibm.com/390/trsmain.html
which was last updated January 2006 already mentions
On 19 Feb 2007 09:40:41 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
David Cole wrote:
RPOs, POs and invoices are all necessary parts of the A-P process,
and the better a vendor understands, cooperates with and *assists* in
the process, the more often:
- The licensing will be renewed on
Charles Mills wrote:
TOS/360, as noted above, is essentially the same as DOS/360.
Only if a tape is essentially the same as a disk!
TOS's code base was largely common with DOS, and the programming APIs were a
subset -- but the SYSRES was on tape! Believe it or not. The equivalent of
an S806
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 6:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives are there?)
SNIP
I have lived the pain, to the point of
Where do you recover? Every place I know of has PC's for access in
the hot sites.
Doug
snip
I don't really like email notification. For some reason, it rarely gets
to me. And I do most of the key related maintenance. Again, CA does the
best for this because I can get my current keys off of
In a message dated 2/19/2007 3:19:22 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where do you recover? Every place I know of has PC's for access in
the hot sites.
Guess the 'big one' would be an EMP detonation. Probably maybe no internet
at all. The other one that comes to
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:48:27 -0400, Clark Morris wrote:
Could you take a laptop with a wireless connection? Failing that, can
you make the case for having either one PC dedicated to mainframe use
and the Internet or at least one PC with Internet connection dedicated
to mainframe. At less
I have tried three times to order a set of PTFs. They are to support the
z9BC that we are planning to get (for z/OS 1.6). The first two times, I
ordered the PTFs from the PSP application. Both times, I got some
weird-*** VSE PTFs. The same set each time. OK, I figured that the link
from PSP to the
I'm having trouble with RECEIVE ORDER today. IBM support told me to check
my firewall
The error I'm getting is:
GIM69207S ** THE CONNECTION WITH THE SERVER FAILED.
java.net.ConnectException:
javax.net.ssl.SSLProtocolException: end
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Peterson
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 3:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Really, really weird problem with IBMLink - PTF ordering
I'm having trouble with RECEIVE
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:58:38 -0600, Brian Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble with RECEIVE ORDER today. IBM support told me to check
my firewall
The error I'm getting is:
GIM69207S ** THE CONNECTION WITH THE SERVER FAILED.
java.net.ConnectException:
Well, that makes me think my problem is our firewall. I'm still trying to
track down those guys to help me with this.
Brian
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:04:04 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:58:38 -0600, Brian Peterson wrote:
I'm having trouble with RECEIVE ORDER today. IBM
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:01:29 +, Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
Hi Tom,
Re. you saying:
the new TRSMAIN supports spanned records so you can TERSE your SMF
data! Grab it at ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/s390/mvs/tools/packlib/
Were you supposed to disclose that to someone who may not have
I think what we are hearing is that my earlier suggestion that maybe the
problem is your AP department was not a red herring after all.
Maybe! Maybe not. Our company does NET-30, and our vendors accept that. And, of
the 15 we manage ourselves, rather than through our service provider, only 4-5
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
