Natasa,
If I understand correctly, you have data -- let's call them files --
residing on distributed Windows, UNIX, and/or Linux servers. You also have
mainframe-attached tape drives with WORM tape cartridges available, for
example IBM TS1120 tape drives with 3592 WORM cartridges. It's likely
Shai,
You can do that with any Virtualisation product that supports MF CKD DASD.
On top of that you need to implement TMM poliscies in SMS.
With the hard to explain aversion to implementing SMS for anything, the TMM
in a can solutions seem to be more attractive (hardware or software
driven).
HI,
Yes, if you have a lot of money then all your tape can be stored in real
3390 disks ant can be a very good option.
But if you have a lot of data which require a lot of 3390 disks and the
other options are TMM, regulars tapes, other virtual tapes, you can consider
to put the data in a very
For those of you who would like to take a test drive of IBM's enterprise
modernization tools including Rational Developer for System z (RDz),
Rational Transformation Workbench (RTW), and Rational Business Developer
(RBD), please point your Web browser here to get more information:
Have you tried
PIC S9(4) COMP SYNC VALUE +0.
so that the whole halfword is usable?
(Using the whole half/fullword in the PIC clause always worked for me
back in ANSI COBOL days onwards.)
Hello;
I hope this is the correct forum to post this.
I have a number of files from a VSE system that are
backed up using FAVER2. Faver2 is compattable with
Faver on Z/os. The bckup contains VSAM, Vsam/Sam and
Sam files. The manual (Z/os) states that all of these
files can be restored, the problem
the job protocol 11.25 (what ever that means) and this month it consumed
16.33. Actually I expected the cpu time would be nearly the same. But there is
this difference I can not explain. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
There are several reasons why Run- or CPU-Times may change.
Differences in runtime can be a variety of reasons. Do you have any
performance reporting tools like STROBE or do you know how to use RMF or SMF
reporting functions? Do you have MICS or MXG?
More or less, it could be due to any of the following
1) Changes in file size
2) Changes in workload
It is the first time, that I write to this list and I am not quiet sure, if I
am on
the right place for asking my question. I hope not being off-topic. If so,
please
accept my apology for my ignorance in advance.
I have a programm written in Cobol which runs monthly on a z/Os-System. The
I forgot to mention that you should search the IBM MAIN archives, I believe
there was a recent thread on job runtime variations.
Lizette
snip
It is the first time, that I write to this list and I am not quiet sure, if
I am on
the right place for asking my question. I hope not being
Hi Carl,
Sorry I missed your primary question on how to restore sequential
files...If you use SMS, there's a few examples I can provide you with.
We can take that off-line.
Thanks,
George Rodriguez
Specialist, Systems Programmer
IT-Operations
(561) 357-7652 (office)
(561) 707-3496 (mobil)
School
All,
currently I check via the FTP-JES-Interface if a job that I've submitted
has run.
But if the job has beed purged from JES2 (i. e. via SDSF) in the
meantime it is not listed by teh FTP-JES-Interface - of course.
Now I wonder if there is another way to check if a job was run (I guess
Hi Carl,
The quick answer is...YES. I was a beta tester for the product and I can
tell you a few things about it. If you have CA's compression program for
VSAM files, it supports the conversion to Faver for z/OS. One of the
main reasons that I use Faver was for my history files. One of the
nice
If you have access, you can look in the system log.
Tools like OPC will capture the end of job event and then do something.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Knigge
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:51 PM
To:
You can also check SMF.
David Logan
Manager of Product Development, Pitney Bowes Software
http://centrus.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of ??? ?? ???
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:54:24 -0400, Steven Conway wrote:
If you've already lost the old email address, then contact the list owner
for assistance.
Or sign on through the web interface at
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
Tom Marchant
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:55:24 -0500, Diehl, Gary wrote:
# Duration Imp Goal description
- - -
1 15000 290% complete within 00:00:01.000
2 12 350% complete within 00:00:08.000
3 450% complete within
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 04:35 -0500, Sascha Weng wrote:
The programm reads inputrecords and writes them in a database (DB2)
and in different outputfiles [...] I expected the cpu time would be
nearly the same. But there is this difference I can not explain.
A month or two ago we enabled
Hallo All,
I have made a change to the parmlib member ARCCMD00 - removed some hardcoded
commands (SETMIG dsns with NOMIGRATION) which were embedded in the STC.
I checked the manual - DFHSM STORAGE ADMINISTRATION GUIDE
SC35-0421-04. However I couldn't find the SETSYS command that
SETMIG DSN() MIGRATION should take care of it..
35.3.1 COMMANDMIGRATION | MIGRATION | NOMIGRATION: Specifying the Way
Space Management Is Controlled
Explanation: COMMANDMIGRATION | MIGRATION | NOMIGRATION are mutually
exclusive, optional parameters specifying how space management is
Thanks Allan for your help also, thanks for the link. I will check it out.
Staller, Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SETMIG DSN() MIGRATION should
take care of it..
35.3.1 COMMANDMIGRATION | MIGRATION | NOMIGRATION: Specifying the Way
Space Management Is Controlled
Explanation:
Shai,
And performance.
Virtualisation over a network may be a fairly large step down from native
FICON speed, and the server supporting those targets would have to support
some fairly high IO rates.
For some very small amount of data some PC based storage with software RAID
may suffice, but
All -
Does anyone have a method or tool that can dump and map a 3390 disk
pack? Or more particularly - does anyone know how to get a dataset (or
datasets) back after it has been deleted (outside of restoring it from a tape
copy which we can't do).
We had a situation where a number of
Check the archives for an earlier thread about restoring deleted files
from a disk. I posted a document about how we were able to do this
several months ago. It is not fool-proof but it may work for you.
DFDSS and AMASPZAP can print tracks from a DASD device
//PRINT EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU
Also, if this is a SMS managed pack you should disable it immediately!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Todd Blandford
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 9:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: recover files deleted from 3390
Aimee Houghton wrote:
Here is my service class for TSO:
Base goal:
CPU Critical flag: NO
# Duration Imp Goal description
- - -
1 800280% complete within 00:00:00.300
2 4Execution velocity of 40
I have a programm written in Cobol which runs monthly on a
z/Os-System.
The programm reads inputrecords and writes them in a database (DB2)
and in
different outputfiles. It consumes nearly the same numbers of input
records every month. I wonder now, why there are so great differences
in the
Do you have any Backup tapes or HSM dumps/backups?
Lizette
Does anyone have a method or tool that can dump and map a 3390 disk
pack? Or more particularly - does anyone know how to get a dataset (or
datasets) back after it has been deleted (outside of restoring it from a
tape copy which we
And is it running on the same physical machine every time? Or are there
multiple systems of different speeds where it can execute?
Dave Thorn * Senior Technology Analyst * SunGard Computer Services * 600
Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees, NJ, 08043
Office 856 566-5412 * Mobile 609 781-0353 * Fax 856
snip
We had a situation where a number of files were accidentally deleted
from a series of volumes (3390s on a 2105 Shark).
snip
As mentioned previously, make sure that you stop allocation on the
affected volumes. Once the space (zos image) is overwritten, the job
becomes VERY difficult.
Jack
Not clear what you want to do. Assuming each LPAR can use all of the
CPU's, then each LPAR can use 479 MSU's, (just not all at once).
You can influence how WLM prioritizes each LPAR with the weights (on
HMC) and with importance settings (within WLM policies).
You can constrain a given LPAR by
Ron,
You right the performance of MFNetDisk is not as good as Ficon (but not bad
as you think).
About PC, XP is a reliable OS and have a lot of software which MVS does
not have and can not have because MF CPU is needed for regular operation.
MFNetDisk also can run in Linux using software
Just got word from another forum that Yahoo may have made some major
changes. One is reporting a 90% drop in spam in the last day or two.
Also one reported that some are unable to access their mailboxes.
Related?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Could anyone shed some light on these errors I see while trying to add
volumes to a SCDS in batch:
Time*** ISPF transaction log ***
Userid:
BURGESS Date: 08/04/02 Page: 1
11:02 Start of ISPF Log - - - - Session # 7
intrdr
AUTH=(JOB=YES,DEVICE=YES,SYSTEM=YES)
jobclass
COMMAND=EXECUTE,
Still not executing command when it comes across NJE node ??
Node
AUTH=(DEVICE=YE
JOB=YES,
SYSTEM=YES,
NET=YES),
puzled..
- Forwarded by Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin on 04/02/2008 10:16 AM -
Hunkeler
Hello everyone, I'm looking for some feedback for some problems were having
with the operating system either locking up (ipl locked up) or slowing down to
a crawl for a period of around 30 minutes.
There are always changes going in but the most recent and suspect is that
1.9 tolerations ptfs
Might this be related to the splitout of the TN3270 stack?
I am just starting my 1.9 build and haven't got the coexistence stuff in
on 1.7 yet.
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information Communications Technology
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:08:49 -0500, Gilbert Cardenas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm looking for some feedback for some problems were having
with the operating system either locking up (ipl locked up) or slowing down to
a crawl for a period of around 30 minutes.
There are always
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:13:31 -0400, Daniel McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might this be related to the splitout of the TN3270 stack?
I am just starting my 1.9 build and haven't got the coexistence stuff in
on 1.7 yet.
Good point. The OP did say the system was locking up or slowing down,
I'd suggest that you look into DB2 detailed accounting report which gives a
very good account of where the CPU was spent while doing DB2 work.
Compare the two reports if your site keeps this historical data otherwise make
do with new report and see what can be improved. There are so many
I can submit job and the /*$dnode works .. or anyother mvs command...
when submitted from nje station it is ignored...nothing happens..do not
see errors on syslog and nje node see/recv's anything back other than job
submitted.
- Forwarded by Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin on 04/02/2008 11:29 AM -
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:31:17 -0500, Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can submit job and the /*$dnode works .. or anyother mvs command...
when submitted from nje station it is ignored...nothing happens..do not
see errors on syslog and nje node see/recv's anything back other than job
submitted.
The // COMMAND instream jcl..?
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for the use of
I will be out of the office starting 04/02/2008 and will not return until
04/03/2008.
I will respond to your message when I return. If this is an emergency you
can try send me a louts note text page.
--
NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
intended by
Does anyone know how to get a hold of Matthew Stitt? His email address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was returned to me with an 'unknown user' error. I
need his help with a program in file 527 of the CBT.
Thanks in advance...
George Rodriguez
Specialist, Systems Programmer
IT-Operations
(561)
ok---seems with my id and psw it works...
still shaky that any command can be issued once authority givenany
means to lock that down..?
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the
Just curious...not actively looking...what's the mainframe job market
looking like these days?
10 more to go...years that is!
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information Communications Technology
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone: 770-621-3256
IOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 (0.0-99.9)
IBM, and others, has recommended this be set to 0.5, to maintain the old
relationship when they were 10 5.
The reason for the change to 1.0 was to do with the fact that resource classes
deal only with CPU service units (unnormalised, IIRC).
-
XP is a reliable OS and have a lot of software which MVS does not have and can
not have because MF CPU is needed for regular operation.
Since when is XP reliable?
Mainframers brag about how long a system stays up.
PFCSK's brag about how fast they can re-boot.
-
Too busy driving to stop for
Since when is XP reliable? haven't had to reboot in the last two
hours?
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Information Communications Technology
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone: 770-621-3256
fax: 770-621-3237
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:
On 2 Apr 2008 10:23:50 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
XP is a reliable OS and have a lot of software which MVS does not have and
can not have because MF CPU is needed for regular operation.
Since when is XP reliable?
Mainframers brag about how long a system stays up.
PFCSK's
George - Do you have something specific you are having a problem with? Perhaps
more details please.
Lizette
Does anyone know how to get a hold of Matthew Stitt? His email address
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was returned to me with an 'unknown user' error. I
need his help with a program in file 527 of
The program doesn't take into account that a dataset name might have
special characters. For example, I have datasets that are called DRA#P.
or AL#P. Matt's program in the index area shows only the AL or the DRA.
Thanks,
George Rodriguez
Specialist, Systems Programmer
IT-Operations
(561) 357-7652
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/abstracts/rd/524/chambliss.html
[They] describe the design of a prototype system by which the IBM DS8000™
storage system can host application extensions, called Adjuncts, that improve
the operation of z/OS® (mainframe) applications. These extensions process
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL) writes:
Mainframers brag about how long a system stays up. PFCSK's brag about
how fast they can re-boot.
a lot of work was done
Thanks Mark...have/found what is needed now..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended
only for
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:18:46 -0500, Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok---seems with my id and psw it works...
still shaky that any command can be issued once authority givenany
means to lock that down..?
RACF. Apparently it is locked down already.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and
I do that e-mail subterfuge on purpose. It keeps the extraneous traffic to
a minimum.
In the NOTES, or INFO (IIRC) member on the file(s) there is better
information about how to contact me. Also certain members of IBM-MAIN know
how to really find me during the daytime.
What problems are you
What?
-- Original message from Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL) writes:
Mainframers
Chris has said (better than I could) what I was thinking. First stop
should be DB2.
Jon
snip
If the amount of data really is about the same then you have to look to
the organization of the data. For your input files; the block size may
have changed which could lead to an increase in CPU time,
To those of you who helped me with this problem earlier: thank you.
After a bout of illness, I resumed working on our transfer and
eventually -- with the help of the sysadmin at the server site -- got it
working.
Morals of the story:
1) Google is your friend, but he can be a confusing friend.
I assume you are discussing DADSM?
That would be a new one on me. I am not aware of any limitations on the
dataset names.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:51:36 -0400, George Rodriguez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The program doesn't take into account that a dataset name might have
special characters. For
Most shops (including ours) use some kind of automation to manage syslog.
In our case, we've been doing it for so long that it's (still) handled by
JES2 automatic commands. In other words, you don't any fancy schmancy
automation product to avoid such problems with manual finger checks.
If you
When you compare the value in the dataset name, the program branches on
anything lower than the letter 'A.' The special characters in the
dataset name like # is dropped from the index.
I do believe that I can fix the program so that the compare and branch
in the program is not done for anything
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:20:23 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:13:31 -0400, Daniel McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might this be related to the splitout of the TN3270 stack?
I am just starting my 1.9 build and haven't got the coexistence stuff in
on 1.7 yet.
There doesn't appear to be any command that will tell HSM to
re-initialize using the updated ARCCMDxx. In this case, I just stop HSM
and restart it immediately.
If that won't work for you, you could write a little script (e.g., REXX)
to read the ARCCMDxx statements and repackage them as HSEND
As Mark mentioned, apparently RACF already has profiles in OPERCMDS to limit
the command. However, you are not seeing the ICH408I messages because of
the options JES2 uses on the RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH request. I believe that
you can get the ICH408I (if you need them) temporarily by using a JES2
Huh?
Warren Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/2/2008 2:11 PM
What?
-- Original message from Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
snip
Note that my email domain has changed from jo-annstores.com to joann.com.
Please update your address book and other records to reflect
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:46:23 -0500, Gilbert Cardenas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:20:23 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might this be related to the splitout of the TN3270 stack?
I am just starting my 1.9 build and haven't got the coexistence stuff in
on 1.7 yet.
This is probably a dumb question, but I'll ask it anyway, and ask
pre-forgiveness. :-)
We are running 3 LPARs on a small z9-BC (production, development/test,
and a sandbox). Each of the LPARs is stand-alone, with no SYSPLEX
sharing of anything, nor do I have anything like GRS implemented. When
Setting up an IBM 6500 as a JES2 PSF printer. I am unable to get it to print
through jes but did get to print using Macro4's vtamprint product over tcpip.
So the network and TCPIP appear to be ok. I included pieces of my jes2 config
and psf proc, also the psf listing. Any ideas what might be
This has been cross posted to the MXG-Listserv.
We will be moving from DB2 v7 to DB2 v8 this weekend and then getting a
zIIP engine shortly. We are currently at z/OS v1.7 with plans to get
v1.9 installed on all LPARs by the end of the summer. Since the z/OS
system programmers are working on
I access IBM-Mail only through the archives web site.
A few minutes ago something was posted to IBM-Main that radically
changed the way this month's archives are displayed on my browser.
Scott Rowe posted something with a very long subject. The subject
is wrapped, but only after taking up about
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Software cost savings from a zIIP
This has been cross posted to the MXG-Listserv.
=20
We will be moving
Do you have to tell PSF what port to use? I have PORTNO=5001 set up to
print to my XEROX printer in my PSF proc segment.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Dazzo
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:25 PM
To:
This is what I have for our Xerox printer
//PRT2 CNTL
//PRT2 PRINTDEV IPADDR='10.255.230.191',/* TCP/I
// PORTNO=5001, /*
// FAILURE=WCONNECT,/* ATTEMPT RECONNEC
// MGMTMODE=OUTAVAIL, /* START SESSION WH
// RELMODE=IDLE,
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 14:21 -0500, Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
what is required (or is it even possible) to use a single
DFSMSrmm tape pool across multiple LPARs?
The CDS can be shared between systems easily, though you might not be
able to do this without GRS. Mike Wood ought to be able to give
Try adding
// PORTNO=9100 /* PORT NUMBER */
to your PSF proc. Check the printer docs, but I think that model uses port
9100.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:38:59 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I access IBM-Mail only through the archives web site.
A few minutes ago something was posted to IBM-Main that radically
changed the way this month's archives are displayed on my browser.
Scott Rowe posted something with
I also think that TCPIP uses port 9100 and requires a Sockets connection
in order to print IPDS - this is the way we got it working using VPS.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Linda Mooney
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:50 PM
- Original Message -
From: Matt Dazzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:30 PM
Subject: TCPIP IPDS Printer
Setting up an IBM 6500 as a JES2 PSF printer. I am unable to get it to
print through jes but did get to print using Macro4's
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
This is probably a dumb question, but I'll ask it anyway, and ask
pre-forgiveness. :-)
This is wise question and I'm trying to give not-so-dumb answer :-)
You can use RMM in multi-host configuration. This is available for
years. The systems need not to be sysplexed.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:56:23 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additional info :
The VTAM/TCPIP/TSO are all running at the SYSSTC level. The TSO stc
does
not come down but only the users are kicked off.
What about TN3270?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect -
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Warren Brown) writes:
What?
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008g.html#18 CA ESD files Options
you can get a satellite photo of the old
Thanks, Radoslaw (and David);
I will have to check out the client-server solution because that is exactly
what I'm looking for. I am using that type of setup for NetBackup on my *IX
boxes and would like the same setup on my z. I don't want to go through the
hassle of dividing the tapes up
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:10:06 -0400, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To be fair and complete, it has clearly been stated that IBM understands
that the lack of a delete/clear function is considered to be a problem and
we hope to provide a solution.
Should be easy enough... just look at
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:38:59 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I access IBM-Mail only through the archives web site.
A few minutes ago something was posted to IBM-Main that radically
changed the way this month's archives are displayed on my browser.
Scott Rowe posted something with
We are planning to move our zSeries disk from our 2105-800 to an EMC DMX4
disk array later this year. Currently the 2105 is mirrored and that is what we
are probably going to do on the DMX. I believe the 2105 also stripes the
zSeries logical volumes across multiple little SCSI disks. The
I have my PSF printers setup similar and also use vtamprint. I have
question did you buy and have the IPDS function installed on the 6500
printer?
Michael Saraco
Systems Consultant
From:
Matt Dazzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date:
04/02/2008 02:29 PM
Subject:
TCPIP IPDS
There is a default port (5001?) which is used if not otherwise specified.
You are seeing message APS933I and not some kind of TCP/IP error
which would normally suggest that you have a good port setting.
You may wish to check for any operator messages about this printer in
the system log. Also,
I didn't notice that until I saw your post. I can assure you that I did not
post that long subject, I even checked the copy of my email in my Sent
folder. I have no idea where that data came from.
Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/2/2008 3:38 PM
I access IBM-Mail only through the archives
Some printers may require a specific PORTNO= to be coded.
Check or specify the DISCINTV= setting.
Make sure IPDS is available/started on the printer.
Some printers can only handle work from one source at a time so if your
vtamprint (or a network connection) is not releasing you may be locked
out.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:24:44 -0500, Gilbert Cardenas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:56:23 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additional info :
The VTAM/TCPIP/TSO are all running at the SYSSTC level. The TSO stc
does
not come down but only the users are kicked off.
I think that if you had vtamprint or anything else connected to the 6500
you will not get the JES PSF printer to connect. And like Ken has stated m
ake sure IPDS is available/started on the printer.
Michael Saraco
Systems Consultant
From:
Ken Porowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
Thanks, Radoslaw (and David);
I will have to check out the client-server solution because that is exactly what I'm
looking for. I am using that type of setup for NetBackup on my *IX boxes and would like the same
setup on my z. I don't want to go through the hassle of
But he's still on 1.7, isn't he? I don't think TN3270 was required to
be split out until 1.8, was it? Or was it 1.7?
Jon
snip
I don't know what you are calling it, but you must be if you are using
TN3270. It is required as of z/OS 1.9. If it is falling into some
low
priority service
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:18:42 -0400, Jon Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But he's still on 1.7, isn't he? I don't think TN3270 was required to
be split out until 1.8, was it? Or was it 1.7?
Jon
snip
I don't know what you are calling it, but you must be if you are using
TN3270. It is required
I would go looking into the network side of the house. Since it appears to
be happening at a certain time, for a certain duration, that points to the
network.
And the TN3270 server is not required at 1.8. I'll find out soon on 1.9.
And yes, I know
MainframeGuilty until proven
Mark,
But the OP said that he was having the problem on the 1.7 system, which had
1.9 toleration applied, not the 1.9 system. 1.7 still runs fine with TN3270
in the TCPIP address space. It isn't until 1.9 that you must split them
out.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
NOTE: All opinions are
Actually according to the guys at my shop that actually configure and maintain
it, you can set up NetBackup to work just like this. I should have been more
clear in my comments. There is an optional piece to NetBackup that allows the
NetBackup server on one box to function as the owner of the
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
