From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rick Barlow
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 7:30 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
I moved LUNs from a DS8880 in CA to a new DS8910 in OH. I defined EDEVs on
both ends and used PIPEDDR to send it across TCPIP most
on behalf of Christian
Borntraeger
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 1:56 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Am 05.04.22 um 23:19 schrieb Martha McConaghy:
I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct
attached SAN LUN (not an EDEV or ECKD
Troth
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 11:48 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Use 'dd' to copy block device to block device. (The name reminds me of DDR
every time I use it!)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022, 11:44 Martha McConaghy
wrote:
> Christian,
> Looks like
on behalf of Christian
> Borntraeger
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 1:56 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
>
> Am 05.04.22 um 23:19 schrieb Martha McConaghy:
> > I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct
> at
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Christian
Borntraeger
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 1:56 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Am 05.04.22 um 23:19 schrieb Martha McConaghy:
> I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct attac
Am 05.04.22 um 23:19 schrieb Martha McConaghy:
I have a few RHEL servers that run on z/VM but boot off of a direct attached
SAN LUN (not an EDEV or ECKD). They reside on an old DS8870 and I need to move
them to a new DS8910. (No PPRC, GDPS, etc.) Is there a way that I could use
VM to copy
-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
I moved LUNs from a DS8880 in CA to a new DS8910 in OH. I defined EDEVs on
both ends and used PIPEDDR to send it across TCPIP most of the way across
the country. I can probably share more details if you need them. a 4G LUN
took about 10
Yes, there’s a limit. 1 TB.
Regards,
Alan
Alan Altmark
IBM Systems Lab Services
Endicott, NY USA
> On Apr 5, 2022, at 6:02 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
>
> Is there a maximum edev size?
>
>
>
> You can copy the LUNs with DDR, but you have to first define an EDEVICE for
> them.
>
; From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Martha
> McConaghy
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:34:22 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
>
> OK, I want to make sure I am understanding it clearly. Its an interesting
> idea, but I re
>
> From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of David
> Kreuter
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:41 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
>
> Hi Martha
> I did this successfully some years back. Make the input a
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Neale Ferguson
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 6:01 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Is there a maximum edev size?
You can copy the LUNs with DDR, but you have to first define an EDEVICE for
them.
Regards,
Alan
Is there a maximum edev size?
You can copy the LUNs with DDR, but you have to first define an EDEVICE for
them.
Regards,
Alan
Alan Altmark
Senior Managing z/VM Consultant
IBM Systems Lab Services
1 607 321 7556 Mobile
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of David Kreuter
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:41 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
Hi Martha
I did this successfully some years back. Make the input a “full pack “ mini on
edev link it read only to reduce
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
OK, I want to make sure I am understanding it clearly. Its an interesting
idea, but I really can't afford to blow away the original disks, so want to be
really sure.
The existing disks are used by the virtual machine by having LOADDEV statements
Association: Secretary
Marist College IT
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rick Troth
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 5:27 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving LUNs using z/VM
What I mean is:
define them even temporarily as EDEVs
What I mean is:
define them even temporarily as EDEVs for the DDR and go for it.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 17:25 Rick Troth wrote:
> If they're defined as EDEVs then you can use DDR.
>
> FBA (EDEV or 3370, etc al) being fixed block, copying the whole disk will
> include the boot partition.
You can copy the LUNs with DDR, but you have to first define an EDEVICE for
them.
Regards,
Alan
Alan Altmark
Senior Managing z/VM Consultant
IBM Systems Lab Services
1 607 321 7556 Mobile
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of
> Martha
If they're defined as EDEVs then you can use DDR.
FBA (EDEV or 3370, etc al) being fixed block, copying the whole disk will
include the boot partition. (Partition tables are not really needed on
fixed block disks, even laptop SSDs, but don't get me started.) Any
"partition table", and all
I'd like to point out that there's a general trend toward workload
containerization, and a big driver is that it's easier to move container
images around than whole operating system instances. Thus if you shift
workloads into container images, you should end up with fewer, skinnier OS
instances
Closing the loop... I got the system up and running under KVM. I hadn't seen
Viktor's message yet but I did basically the same steps.
Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Viktor
Mihajlovski:
>I assume it's SLES,
It is. I'm starting with a SLES guest but I have RHEL
On 11/30/20 11:34 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 30.11.20 21:10, Mark Post wrote:
On 11/30/20 1:16 PM, Alan Haff wrote:
I have a number of Linux guests running under z/VM. I'd like to move some of
them to a KVM host running in another LPAR. Naively I tried DDRing a guest's
disks to new
On 12/1/20 5:25 PM, Alan Haff wrote:
Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard J Moore:
In this case I think you're saying have two configurations - one under KVM
and another under zVM. Then manually co-ordinate the sharing or resources
but ensure that you don't
Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Richard J Moore:
>In this case I think you're saying have two configurations - one under KVM
>and another under zVM. Then manually co-ordinate the sharing or resources
>but ensure that you don't have both guests logged on
Linux on 390 Port wrote on 01/12/2020 11:51:37:
> From: Christian Borntraeger
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 01/12/2020 11:55
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Moving a Linux guest from z/VM to KVM?
> Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
>
> On 01.12.20 12:07, Richard J Moore wrot
On 01.12.20 12:07, Richard J Moore wrote:
> Is that really possible (KVM guest <-> z/VM guest)?
> As far as I am aware the KVM and zVM hypervisors share no metadata
> regarding the guest's set up. Nor do they share any of the protocols used
> in live (or dead) guest relocation.
>
> Am I
Christian Borntraeger
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 01/12/2020 06:35
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Moving a Linux guest from z/VM to KVM?
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port
On 30.11.20 21:10, Mark Post wrote:
> On 11/30/20 1:16 PM, Alan Haff wrote:
>> I have a number of Linux g
On 30.11.20 21:10, Mark Post wrote:
> On 11/30/20 1:16 PM, Alan Haff wrote:
>> I have a number of Linux guests running under z/VM. I'd like to move some of
>> them to a KVM host running in another LPAR. Naively I tried DDRing a guest's
>> disks to new volumes and IPLing off of the new volumes.
On 11/30/20 1:16 PM, Alan Haff wrote:
> I have a number of Linux guests running under z/VM. I'd like to move some of
> them to a KVM host running in another LPAR. Naively I tried DDRing a guest's
> disks to new volumes and IPLing off of the new volumes. No luck, the virtio
> modules aren't
On Behalf Of Mark Post
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 11:56 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving Root to Larger disk
On 6/26/20 9:54 AM, Davis, Larry (National VM Capability) wrote:
> I am trying to move a Linux root (/) file system to a larger disk
> format
I'm not sure what yo
On 6/26/20 9:54 AM, Davis, Larry (National VM Capability) wrote:
> I am trying to move a Linux root (/) file system to a larger disk format
I'm not sure what you mean by "a larger disk format" because:
> I was able to block copy the data from one device to the other using the DD
> command below
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
Ah - I see you meant for this to be run against new DASD -- assuming the
copy had been done... I wasn't sure how/when the DASD would be copied to
the old...so it does depend... the script should be run before or
after
: Thursday, August 16, 2018 7:39 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
Ah - I see you meant for this to be run against new DASD -- assuming the
copy had been done... I wasn't sure how/when the DASD would be copied to
the old...so
; 'COMMENTS ? IPLPARMS' ipl_parm
>>
>>queue 'IPL Parameters Options are: '
>>queue 'CONS= FN=fn FT=ft CLEARPDR REPAIR NOEXITS NOHCD PROMPT'
>> queue 'PDNUM=n PDOFF=offset PDVOL=addr STORE=M/G/T/P/E '
>>queue
'SALIPL' dev_addr '(' salp_opt end
>
> Exit
>
>
>
> Larry Davis
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Davis, Jim [PRI-1PP]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 17:54
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.E
rom: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Davis,
Jim [PRI-1PP]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 17:54
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
Thanks for the info. I get the following.
Current IPL parameters:
FN=SYSTEM
Q IPLPARMS should display what was set in the IPL SALIPL when it was loaded to
the RESVOL
When you move the VM Volumes as long as the VOLSER's don't change there should
be no issues unless you are setting the new devices OFFLINE AT IPL time in
Your SYSTEM CONFIG file.
For the most part Spool
Just a small warning: QUERY IPLPARMS shows you the parameters that will be
used on SHUTDOWN REIPL.
They will typically be the parameters that were in effect at IPL time, but
they can be changed by SET IPLPARMS.
I recommend updating AUTOLOG1 to stash away the output of QUERY IPLPARMS so
Rohling
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 5:40 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
>
> CP Query IPL gives you the parms used...
>
> You can use SAIPL to bring up z/VM the first time on new DASD (just s
on 390 Port On Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 5:40 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
CP Query IPL gives you the parms used...
You can use SAIPL to bring up z/VM the first time on new DASD (just specify
I have moved/cloned z/VM 6.4 systems and the only thing related to the new
DASD addresses that I've had to do is run SALIPL against the new IPL volume
and specify the real address of the device with the parm disk as part of
the IPLPARMS text. For example, if F000 is the real address of the new
Move all six volumes to their new addresses.
IPL from new res volume address.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Tom Huegel
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 5:36 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving z/vm and zlinux volumes from old dasd to new dasd
Last
CP Query IPL gives you the parms used...
You can use SAIPL to bring up z/VM the first time on new DASD (just specify
correct PDVOL=) .. then run SALIPL on the IPL volume to make the parms
stick and not need SAIPL next time..
Scott Rohling
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 2:17 PM Davis, Jim
Last question Q IPLPARMS
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Davis, Jim [PRI-1PP] <
jim.da...@primerica.com> wrote:
> I have been tasked with moving our z/VM and zlinux file system volume from
> an old DASD system to a New DASD system.
> All of my device numbers / unit addresses will change.
>
> I
Hi Donald,
> Just FYI... I spent many hours tinkering with VM DRR and Linux dd and
> different experiments of formatting etc etc. I had a case open with Red
> Hat, which they eventually pretty much gave up on and gave me the source
> code for fdasd and dasdfmt (which is where I learned of the
Peter,
THANK YOU !! Using fdasd option u fixed it up. I was then able to expand
the file system and I now have a happy RHEL system on a mod-27 with lots of
spare space.
Just FYI... I spent many hours tinkering with VM DRR and Linux dd and
different experiments of formatting etc etc. I had a case
On 29.06.2018 00:10, Donald Russell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 14:27 Donald Russell wrote:
>> The dasdfmt -b 4096 --mode=expand worked great. Started formatting the
>> disk at track 150240 as expected. But then fdasd choked saying only the
>> first 10016 cylinders are formatted so I
>>> On 6/28/2018 at 06:10 PM, Donald Russell wrote:
> I forgot to put a subject. Now there*s one. :-)
> Don
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 14:27 Donald Russell wrote:
>
-snip-
>> Any suggestions beyond install from scratch on the larger disk? :-)
What I typically do is:
1. Run dasdfmt on the
> I started in the business in 1972. Our local college had an 8k IBM 1130
Almost immediately,
> I wanted to find out move about it. After graduation, I went to work at
my present employer
> (Baldor). After 40 years here, I have accepted an early retirement.
Sounds like we both got into the
I just unsubscribed with my old email and reset with a personal one. Really
makes sense noting Corp social policies these days too.
Kurt
On Feb 9, 2017 1:08 PM, "Mark Post" wrote:
>>> On 2/8/2017 at 02:57 PM, Ron Foster wrote:
> After 40 years here, I
>>> On 2/8/2017 at 02:57 PM, Ron Foster wrote:
> After 40 years here, I have accepted an early retirement.
Hi, Ron,
Glad to hear you're able to retire. Are you going to actually retire, or look
for work elsewhere?
It was nice getting to know you via work and at SHARE.
While the IT guys might be willing - I'd hope the company's business and
security policies wouldn't allow that.Any forwarding should be to
whoever will be responsible for Ron's business communications and Baldor.
Less messy all around to just subscribe with your own personal email.
Scott
Create a gmail account and ask Baldor's IT to auto-forward your emails for a
couple of months?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ron
Foster
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 11:57 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Moving on
I
Congratulations, Mike!!
Regards, Len
Leonard J. Santalucia
CTO | Business Development Manager | Certified Specialist
Vicom Infinity, Inc.
IBM Premier Business Partner
One Penn Plaza - Suite 2010
New York, New York 10119
Office804-918-3728
congrats!
On 08/17/2015 10:43 AM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing
to ADP.
At Innovation, helping to roll out the FDRPASVM product that allows you to
migrate running Linux and z/VM systems to new DASD regardless of
On 8/17/2015 at 10:43 AM, Michael MacIsaac mike99...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello lists,
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing
to ADP.
It's starting to get difficult to keep track of you lately. After 30 years in
one place, now you're job hopping. :) I
Congratulations Mike!
ADP is a company I admire very much, you will have fun working there.
On Aug 17, 2015 11:49, Leonard Santalucia lsantalu...@vicominfinity.com
wrote:
Congratulations, Mike!!
Regards, Len
Leonard J. Santalucia
CTO | Business Development Manager | Certified Specialist
Congratulations Mike!
We will need to reinstate a moving on list just for you.
David
div Original message /divdivFrom: Michael MacIsaac
mike99...@gmail.com /divdivDate:08-17-2015 11:43 (GMT-04:00)
/divdivTo: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU /divdivSubject: Moving on /divdiv
/divHello
Congrats and good luck on your new job Mike...
I have again started a new job, moving on from Innovation Data Processing
to ADP.
At Innovation, helping to roll out the FDRPASVM product that allows you
to
migrate running Linux and z/VM systems to new DASD regardless of
manufacturer was a
On 10/11/2012 11:20 PM, Scott Rohling wrote:
The easiest thing to do is bring the guest down and LINK these 2 disks
from another running Linux .. mount them as /mnt /mnt/disk1 and 2 and copy
- I would use rsync:
rsync -av /mnt/disk1/ /mnt/disk2
In case you follow down this path, don't
Would he need to execute the 'chroot' and 'zipl' commands after
copying the disk contents?
Thomas Denier
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
-Scott Rohling wrote: -
The easiest thing to do is bring the guest down and LINK these 2
disks
from another running Linux .. mount them as /mnt
The easiest thing to do is bring the guest down and LINK these 2 disks
from another running Linux .. mount them as /mnt /mnt/disk1 and 2 and copy
- I would use rsync:
rsync -av /mnt/disk1/ /mnt/disk2
Unmount, detach - and swap the disks in the directory so the big disk is
the same address as
On 10/11/2012 at 03:41 PM, Ben Duncan b...@linux4ms.net wrote:
Hi group. Need to some help in transferring and recreating the ROOT ( /
) dasd device to another dasd
Specifically we want to migrate from a 300MB partition and replace it
with a 2Gb partition which is
already formatted and
Did you do a vgscan?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had a disk failure on my linux root filesystem, please don't ask how
that happened, and now need to move an LVM file system to another Linux
guest.
I've added all the disk to the guest, put
Yes.
sles003:/srv/ftp # vgscan
Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while...
Found volume group vg1 using metadata type lvm2
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Jonathan Quay jonathan.q...@ihg.comwrote:
Did you do a vgscan?
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Mark Pace
Can you see the /dev/mapper structures now? Mount 'em up.
* *
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes.
sles003:/srv/ftp # vgscan
Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while...
Found volume group vg1 using metadata type lvm2
On Wed, Dec
That didn't seem to help.
But I did do an lvscan which showed that the lv was inactive. So I did an
lvchange -ay and that did create the devices so that I could mount the
system.
Thanks very much
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jonathan Quay jonathan.q...@ihg.comwrote:
Can you see the
On 12/21/2011 at 10:10 AM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote:
That didn't seem to help.
But I did do an lvscan which showed that the lv was inactive. So I did an
lvchange -ay and that did create the devices so that I could mount the
system.
The command you're looking for is vgchange
Thanks, I hope to never need it again. But as the last 2 days have
shown. You never know!
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
On 12/21/2011 at 10:10 AM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote:
That didn't seem to help.
But I did do an lvscan which
... If DB2 isn't an option, maybe
Oracle on Power7 would be a better fit (saying without knowledge of
Oracle's commitment of support there as well).
From: Barton Robinson bar...@vm1.velocity-software.com
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date: 03/18/2011 04:04 PM
Subject:Re: Moving Oracle off
: Barton Robinson bar...@vm1.velocity-software.com
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date: 03/18/2011 04:04 PM
Subject:Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from the field?
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
wow, your DBAs have the authority to spend
. We'll cross that road when we get to it.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Christopher Cox
Sent: Wed 3/23/2011 11:11 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from the field?
Oracle is NOT supporting them well on zLinux
with
this. I know that Oracle on Linux can work well,
and that's the truth.
zNorman
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 Wednesday 8:58 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle
.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Christopher Cox
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:12 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from the field?
Oracle is NOT supporting them well on zLinux. So
/2011 11:11 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from the field?
Oracle is NOT supporting them well on zLinux. So... there's both the
financial and technical reason.
Why would anyone stay with a platform that is not well supported? Oracle
problems. It is
religo politico - cannot argue with that type of vaporized logic.
David
Original Message
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from the field?
From: Pat Carroll pcarr...@llbean.com
Date: Wed, March 23, 2011 1:30 pm
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Works
On Wednesday, 03/23/2011 at 12:09 EDT, Barton Robinson
bar...@vm1.velocity-software.com wrote:
so is this guy a troll or just someone clueless (and i'm tryin to be
nice). And I assume that Alan is behind the wood shed counciling...
I will graciously assume that you were referring to some other
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from the field?
The poster must have been confusing our world with vmware. Grins. We are
supported.
Echoing Barton Oracle runs *VERY WELL*. IBM has experts that will come
in tune the LIVING DAYLIGHTS out of
Oracle - including reaching back
Hi James ,
There is a couple information that should be knowing before someone take
some strange decision like that . The first is your machine model and size
of the linux guest , and also the number of linux guest running at the same
lpar .
About the Oracle slow response , that would really
Especially with 11R2 due out any minute (day).
Gerard
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 5:03 PM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from
We are about to put into production, once we have gotten our multipath
(failover) issues resolved with EMC, Oracle 10. We had to step back to SLES 10
SP3+ due to Oracles glacial speed with certification of Oracle 11 on zLinux.
Also, the application only runs on Oracle 10, I imagine for the same
wow, your DBAs have the authority to spend that kind of money and make
that kind of change without management signature? So no financial
analysis, no technical reason, sounds religious.
CHAPLIN, JAMES (CTR) wrote:
We just had a surprise announcement by one of the Oracle DBAs during a
zLinux
inline: graycol.gifinline: pic26058.gifinline: ecblank.gifattachment: BARTON.vcf
It's government, what do you expect ;-)
James Chaplin
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Barton Robinson
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 5:03 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving Oracle off zLinux boxes -- comments from the field?
It's government, what do you expect ;-)
James Chaplin
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Barton Robinson
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 5:03 PM
To: LINUX-390
Mark,
Glad to hear that you find a good position. Best of luck to you.
Bob
Bob Horne
IBM Software Group - Tivoli
Atlanta, GA
From:
Mark Wheeler mwheele...@hotmail.com
To:
LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date:
02/18/2010 10:30 AM
Subject:
Moving On
Sent by:
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Phil best of luck in your new role and look forward to your posts
David Kreuter
Original Message
Subject: Moving On: Cross-posted to linux and vm lists
From: Phil Tully tull...@optonline.net
Date: Tue, December 29, 2009 8:12 pm
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
To All,
As of
how much shorter you can make this outage.
Aria
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:39 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving a Samba directory
Like I said, I knew
am not sure how much shorter you can make this outage.
Aria
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:39 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving a Samba directory
Like I
Thanks Mark
I can slip this thru and cycle the Samba server, during a known time period
where no one is actively accessing Samba files.
Thanks
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
Mark Post mp...@novell.com 9/9/2009 6:14 PM
On 9/9/2009 at 4:38 PM, Tom Duerbusch duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote:
Mark Post wrote:
On 9/9/2009 at 4:38 PM, Tom Duerbusch duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote:
-snip-
Right? When I cycle the server, the users have to reaccess their shares?
I doubt it. The Windows clients won't know that Samba has been cycled, so they
will just try to re-establish the
Tom,
To be safe, you want to do this while Samba is not running. When I upgrade
the disks on my Samba server, I use rsync to copy the contents of the
existing drive to the new drive using the -av and --delete options. You can
do this during the day when the server is being used. Then just
If you do not stop the samba service you run a risk of files being
accessed during the move, and this could lead to corruption of the new
files. As recommended before, you should be able to copy the bulk of the
data without shutting down the service. With the bulk of the data
mirrored on the new
Like I said, I knew the answer to this one (i.e. shutdown Samba), but I hoping
for a quick and dirty way, of doing the conversion with Samba still up.
Well, once this is done, I can then add disks to the LVM on the fly.
Just hate to have to do the scheduling of downtime (users and servers) when
On 9/9/2009 at 4:38 PM, Tom Duerbusch duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote:
-snip-
Right? When I cycle the server, the users have to reaccess their shares?
I doubt it. The Windows clients won't know that Samba has been cycled, so they
will just try to re-establish the connection the next
So can anyone help me on this? I am still stuck. When I copy the volumes and
then IPL from the new UCB It will only recognize the old volumes but I have
changed everything in zipl.conf and fstab.
One of my thoughts is that I need to change dasd_mod. During boot I get
these messages:
Starting
Paul,
If you have access to a installation Linux, try this:
1 - start the installation as if you would reinstall from scratch
2 - somewhere in the installation, the installer will activate the dasds for
you. as soon as it happens, drop to a shell (connect another session, and
under sles or rhel
Did you run zipl and mk_initrd?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Paul Meier
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:26 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving native linux
So can anyone help me on this? I am still stuck. When I
On 7/30/2009 at 10:25 AM, Paul Meier pm.mli...@gmail.com wrote:
So can anyone help me on this? I am still stuck. When I copy the volumes and
then IPL from the new UCB It will only recognize the old volumes but I have
changed everything in zipl.conf and fstab.
One of my thoughts is that I
Thanks,
I did not run mkinitrd. I did everything else but that. It works now!
Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Mark Post mp...@novell.com wrote:
On 7/30/2009 at 10:25 AM, Paul Meier pm.mli...@gmail.com wrote:
So can anyone help me on this? I am still stuck. When I copy the volumes
What would I need to change to make sure this works.
First thing, download and run www.sinenomine.net/download/sane-dasd-update to
change the by-id references you have in your /etc/fstab to by-path BEFORE you
lose the old disks. The way things are now, your system is irrevocably linked
to
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo