Sorry, neglected to mention (it was long ago and I had forgotten), I
installed it with texfont
texfont --ma --in --ve=sil --co=gentium --fontroot=/usr/share/texmf
--afmpl [--en=ec]
hmm, can't remember if it was /usr/share on the end
Thank you for your efforts
Johan
2007/2/2, Taco Hoekwater
2007/2/2, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am trying to work this out, but I obviously miss the gentium
font files (metric and map files, as wel as the actual fonts).
I can get the ttfs from the sil site, but where did the tfms
and map files come from?
Take mine:
2007/2/2, Johan Sandblom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry, neglected to mention (it was long ago and I had forgotten), I
installed it with texfont
Btw: The -recorder switch of pdftex/web2c (don't know how to use that
with texexec) will write a list of all files used by pdftex (including
fonts
The -recorder switch of pdftex/web2c (don't know how to use that
with texexec)
Like so:
texexec --passon=-recorder file.tex
The --passon feature had lapsed in the transition from perl to ruby
texexec, but Hans and Taco fixed it in one of the recent ConTeXt
releases. I now use it all
See minimal example here:
http://sarovar.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=729group_id=106atid=493
Best, Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Hi Johan,
If the only change is the pdftex version, than it sounds like this
is a pdftex bug. Any chance you can create a small standalone testfile?
Best, Taco
Johan Sandblom wrote:
When I moved from pdftex-1.30.5-2.2 (from texlive-base-bin
2005.dfsg.2-10 on debian) to pdftex-1.40.1 suddenly
It took a lot of searching for a minimal case, apparently there are
many levels of interaction here. The file below has blanks for fi fl
ff when compiled with pdftex-1.40.1 but not with pdftex-1.30.5. Do you
need some parts of my tex/font setup as well?
Johan
\usetypescriptfile[type-sil-gentium
Johan Sandblom wrote:
It took a lot of searching for a minimal case, apparently there are
many levels of interaction here. The file below has blanks for fi fl
ff when compiled with pdftex-1.40.1 but not with pdftex-1.30.5. Do you
need some parts of my tex/font setup as well?
Johan
has blanks for fi fl
ff when compiled with pdftex-1.40.1 but not with pdftex-1.30.5. Do you
need some parts of my tex/font setup as well?
Johan
\usetypescriptfile[type-sil-gentium]
\usetypescript[my][sil-gentium]
\setupbodyfont[sil-gentium, 10pt]
\definetypeface
[chance
When I moved from pdftex-1.30.5-2.2 (from texlive-base-bin
2005.dfsg.2-10 on debian) to pdftex-1.40.1 suddenly ligatures in
gentium exhibited erratic behavior: they appeared correctly (or, more
accurately, the letters appeared, they did not look like a proper
ligature) on screen in xpdf
It breaks here on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS, latest pdftex, latest context distro
t is
\starttext
\def\myCMD#1{%..
\stoptext
t1 is
\starttext
\input \string|echo -n bla
\stoptext
luigi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# texmfstart texexec --pdf t
TeXExec | processing document 't'
TeXExec | no ctx file found
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
But this should be enough to reproduce it:
\starttext
\input \string|echo -n bla
\stoptext
Breaks here too, using pdftex 1.40.0, context 2006.12.27, Ubuntu i386:
This bug is found and fixed and will be corrected in the next pdftex
release.
Best, Taco
the pdftex list nowadays is mostly a latex bug/support report list ;
pdftex and luatex development have their own lists
hmm I think this is the complete list.
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Hans Hagen wrote:
You need to delete all traces of pdfetex, pdfetex.pool, pdfetex,
pdfetex.exe, pdfetex.dll, trhe pdfetex engine path, etc
Thanks, this helps.
Another question concerning formats: in TeX-live 2007, what should be the
right place to put the formats?
texexec
Hello,
this is probably only related to pdfTeX and not to ConTeXt, but I'm too
lazy to subscribe yet to another list... ;)
While playing around with the new shell escaping in pdftex-1.40, I got
the following crash:
TeXExec | processing document 'test'
TeXExec | no ctx file found
TeXExec | tex
Martin Schröder wrote:
2007/1/4, Peter Münster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
this is probably only related to pdfTeX and not to ConTeXt, but I'm too
lazy to subscribe yet to another list... ;)
I can't reproduce this with my old ConTeXt 2005.01.31 on SUSE 10.1.
I have only the pdftex-1.40-rc4 here
But this should be enough to reproduce it:
\starttext
\input \string|echo -n bla
\stoptext
Breaks here too, using pdftex 1.40.0, context 2006.12.27, Ubuntu i386:
*** glibc detected *** pdfetex: free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x082d42f0 ***
Running texexec with --verbose says what
2007/1/3, Sanjoy Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe I missing a trick, but the draftmode didn't save much time. I
guess I should make the test file read in a few huge images?
Yes. And if you then generate PDF 1.5 with object stream and
compression, you can gain much. I have a test case which
On 1/2/07, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The next message probably also is interestering to a few of you that
are not subscribed to the pdftex list.
Oh, i'm one of the few...
by the way
http://www.logosrl.it/context/pdftex/1.40.0-2.2
Also, greping pdftex list I found
http
guess I should make the test file read in a few huge images?
try bigger stuff, say a file with some 100 meg pictures and 25 fonts ; that's
what draftmode is for (one of those ideas that popped up during eurotex 2006 at
our usual pdftex dev chat).
Hans
luigi scarso wrote:
On 1/2/07, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The next message probably also is interestering to a few of you that
are not subscribed to the pdftex list.
Oh, i'm one of the few...
the pdftex list nowadays is mostly a latex bug/support report list
Hello,
texexec --make --all puts the formats in the subdirectory pdfetex but I
think it should be pdftex now.
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
texexec --make --all puts the formats in the subdirectory
pdfetex but I think it should be pdftex now.
If 'now' means with pdftex 1.40.0, I think you're right. But that
would break context with earlier pdftex's. I've made a symlink from
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex to pdfetex and all is okay
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
texexec --make --all puts the formats in the subdirectory
pdfetex but I think it should be pdftex now.
If 'now' means with pdftex 1.40.0, I think you're right. But that
would break context with earlier pdftex's. I've made a symlink from
/var/lib/texmf/web2c
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
which makes be believe that it will not work for normal cases.
However, how about adding a switch to texexec, say --draft, which
will run the document in draftmode until no more runs are needed, and
will then run a final typesetting run without the draftmode. This may
Martin wrote:
2007/1/3, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
which makes be believe that it will not work for normal cases.
However, how about adding a switch to texexec, say --draft, which
will run the document in draftmode until no more runs are needed, and
will then run a final
which makes be believe that it will not work for normal cases.
However, how about adding a switch to texexec, say --draft, which
will run the document in draftmode until no more runs are needed, and
will then run a final typesetting run without the draftmode. This may
speed up the
Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
which makes be believe that it will not work for normal cases.
However, how about adding a switch to texexec, say --draft, which
will run the document in draftmode until no more runs are needed, and
will then run a final typesetting run without the draftmode. This may
.
maybe later, when i feel comfortable enough with it; for the moment i added
--draft
Great.
Is there someplace where I can download pdftex binaries for windows?
The sarovar site only has source code.
Aditya
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg
2007/1/4, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there someplace where I can download pdftex binaries for windows?
The sarovar site only has source code.
Akira's W32TeX:
http://www.fsci.fuk.kindai.ac.jp/~kakuto/win32-ptex/web2c75-e.html
Or get the latest TexLive test image.
Best
Martin
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Martin Schröder wrote:
2007/1/4, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there someplace where I can download pdftex binaries for windows?
The sarovar site only has source code.
Akira's W32TeX:
http://www.fsci.fuk.kindai.ac.jp/~kakuto/win32-ptex/web2c75-e.html
Thanks
Hi,
The next message probably also is interestering to a few of you that
are not subscribed to the pdftex list.
Best, Taco
Original Message
Subject: [pdftex] pdftex 1.40
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:56:59 +0100
From: Martin Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDF-TeX mailing list
On Jan 2, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
The next message probably also is interestering to a few of you that
are not subscribed to the pdftex list.
Best, Taco
Taco and all other pdftex-developers,
congratulations on getting version 1.40 ready for the new year! I had
been
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
- draftmode: With \pdfdraftmode=1 or the commandline switch -draftmode
pdfTeX doesn't write the output pdf and doesn't actually read any
images, thus speeding up compilations when you know you need an extra
run but don't care about
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Peter Münster wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
- draftmode: With \pdfdraftmode=1 or the commandline switch -draftmode
pdfTeX doesn't write the output pdf and doesn't actually read any
images, thus speeding up compilations when you know you
2007/1/3, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
which makes be believe that it will not work for normal cases.
However, how about adding a switch to texexec, say --draft, which
will run the document in draftmode until no more runs are needed, and
will then run a final typesetting run without the
From the texexec man page:
--fast
Typeset the document(s) as fast as possible without causing
problems.
--final
Perform a final run without skipping anything. This option is
typically used with --fast.
So --fast --final could be the pair of switches to add. But I tried
an
Hello,
(it's a repost, in case my previous email got lost...)
my attempt to get correct French spacing before punctuation does no more
work with the latest ConTeXt-beta.
Is there now a new method with pdfTeX-1.40 to get automatically the good
spacing (as announced some months ago)?
Today I try
Hello,
my attempt to get correct French spacing before punctuation does no more
work with the latest ConTeXt-beta.
Is there now a new method with pdfTeX-1.40 to get automatically the good
spacing?
Today I try it like this (without success):
%%% module t-french.tex %%%
\def
Hello,
I try to use the beta versions of ConTeXt and pdfTeX now and I find the
following issue (on latest TeX-live):
with TEXFORMATS = .;$TEXMF/web2c/{$engine,} in texmf.cnf and
pdfTeX-1.40.XXX, texexec --make writes the formats to
texmf-config/web2c/pdfetex but pdftex looks only into texmf
� wrote:
Hello,
I try to use the beta versions of ConTeXt and pdfTeX now and I find the
following issue (on latest TeX-live):
with TEXFORMATS = .;$TEXMF/web2c/{$engine,} in texmf.cnf and
pdfTeX-1.40.XXX, texexec --make writes the formats to
texmf-config/web2c/pdfetex but pdftex looks only
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
pdfetex is no longer valid, it's pdftex now (includes etex); so. remove
any trace of pdfetex, take the latest texexec, adn regenerate the formats
Hello Hans,
this is exactly what I did: I removed bin/pdfetex and web2c/pdfetex.pool
and then texexec --make
� wrote:
Does not downward compatible mean, that there are other more serious
issues?
each year downward compatibily has someho wbeen broken (changes in binaries,
tds, font names; but by now texmfstart/texexec should catch such problems)
Hans
Hi,
I've installed Tex and Context on my Mac through II-installer and
started to experiment with simple Context files. I'm using Texshop
v2.09 as text editor. When I generate output with the pdftex default
script I get a pdf-file with poor letter quality (thick p's and t's
and j's). Also
2006/10/1, Robert Kroon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
v2.09 as text editor. When I generate output with the pdftex default
script I get a pdf-file with poor letter quality (thick p's and t's
and j's). Also the combination of the characters ij are shown as ..
in the pdf-file. When I switch to the default
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
This process works in a similar fashion for all programs like
pdftex, dvipdfmx, dvips, and xdvi, but texfont only creates a
map file for pdftex. Unf, the pdftex map file cannot be used by
dvips, so for dvips you have to create your own (like you did
Andreas Schneider wrote:
Thanks a lot, with that it works now (with the texnansi encoding)! These
facts should be mentioned in the docs.
The next version of texfont will create a dvips and dvipdfmx map file
as well as a pdftex one, making life a bit easier.
But gv gives an error when I try
Hi!
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Andreas Schneider wrote:
Thanks a lot, with that it works now (with the texnansi encoding)! These
facts should be mentioned in the docs.
The next version of texfont will create a dvips and dvipdfmx map file
as well as a pdftex one, making life
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
how does -afmpl perform? i always suspected afm2tfm not to take non
existing ligs into account
Just as bad (here, at least). I'll get back to you about this
tomorrow,
it is too late for me to do
Hans Hagen wrote:
well, we can consider to let texfont use a ec-fixed encoding for
afm2tfm and the regular ec encoding for the rest
--afmencoding=ec-fixed
or so
or fix afm2pl.
for a while afm2pl was the default, but then it suddenly defaulted to
latex default (em) spacing which
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
how does -afmpl perform? i always suspected afm2tfm not to take non
existing ligs into account
Just as bad (here, at least). I'll get back to you about this
tomorrow,
it is too late for me to do serious work.
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
because of a line in /opt/tex/teTeX/texmf/aliases :-/
ah, the dreadful aliases file ... in tex live they're gone ; let's hope
that this aliases fiel does not contain anything related to context tex
files (patterns for instance)
Either way, it seems that this LIGKERN
On Aug 9, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I've experimented with afm2pl, and as I wrote in an earlier mail: the
beginning of EC.enc with its additional LIGKERN instructions confuses
it so it will not include default ligatures.
As it turns out, this is the same for afm2tfm. And to
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
And for the LIGKERN: yes, I asked about them on the tex-fonts list a
while ago, and nobody considered them a problem. IMHO, they're
totally useless or even worse, but I received the same ol' answers:
can't change that, it's legacy etc. I think Mojca knows
On Aug 9, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
i see, interesting; before we do that, can you check if we can/need to
do the same with texnansi, qx, etc ?
Hans
texnansi is OK, in my experience, and qx as well. t5 also has some
LIGKERN instructions at the beginning, but doesn't have
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
since you're typesetting german ... why not using the texnansi encoding
instead of the flawed ec encoding?
The problem is that it doesn't work with the texnansi encoding either.
See my last mails.
Andreas
___
Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
since you're typesetting german ... why not using the texnansi encoding
instead of the flawed ec encoding?
The problem is that it doesn't work with the texnansi encoding either.
See my last mails.
if the problem is
Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
if the problem is in a font not having glyphs, you can consider making a
special encoding vector + enco-* file; not that complex since one can
start with an existing one
The problem is that it does work with pdftex (tex
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Somehow you yourself (and not texfont!) have created a font map
file called bgj.map for dvips, and that file is wrong.
Hmm, I have created it just for LaTeX. Since it contains only entries for
ec-bgj* (without 'raw') it should not interfere with the
, when there are no longer virtual fonts to
resolve, it looks for the 'base' fonts in its map file.
This process works in a similar fashion for all programs like
pdftex, dvipdfmx, dvips, and xdvi, but texfont only creates a
map file for pdftex. Unf, the pdftex map file cannot be used by
dvips, so
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
The second problem:
texfont simply does not 'do' EC correctly (at least not on my machine).
There are simply no fi ligatures, not in pdftex either. I will
investigate this further.
how does -afmpl perform? i always suspected afm2tfm not to take non
existing ligs
the way we do is that i want to prevent
pdftex to be too clever in sharing font resources (thre are versions out there
that assume sequivalent Names to always equivalent which is not always true
(think of slanted or extended fonts)
(i've been bitten too often by that so i play safe
Hans Hagen wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
The second problem:
texfont simply does not 'do' EC correctly (at least not on my machine).
There are simply no fi ligatures, not in pdftex either. I will
investigate this further.
how does -afmpl perform? i always suspected afm2tfm not to take non
On Aug 8, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
how does -afmpl perform? i always suspected afm2tfm not to take non
existing ligs into account
Just as bad (here, at least). I'll get back to you about this
tomorrow,
it is too late for me to do serious work.
I've experimented with
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Andreas Schneider wrote:
but xdvi gives error messages like [...]
My guess is that you have to copy the final ec.enc file you used
to the folder where dvips (and xdvi, which looks in the same
place normally) looks for encoding files.
I created a
What about Lua in pdftex ?
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
luigi scarso wrote:
What about Lua in pdftex ?
you may expect around the end of the year; i'm currently playing with some
alphaware in order to explore possibilities and interfacing needs -)
Hans
Hans van der Meer wrote:
I use (as root: sudo) the following shell script to install the
latest pdfetex. For me it works. It might be of use to you.
#!/bin/sh
echo Installing Pdftex...
umask 022
unzip pdftex-1.30.4.zip
cd pdftex-1.30.4
sh ./Build
cp -f build/texk/web2c/pdftex `which pdftex
Hi Hans and Hans,
Hans Hagen wrote:
Hans van der Meer wrote:
I use (as root: sudo) the following shell script to install the
latest pdfetex. For me it works. It might be of use to you.
#!/bin/sh
echo Installing Pdftex...
umask 022
unzip pdftex-1.30.4.zip
cd pdftex-1.30.4
sh ./Build
cp -f
Hi,
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
The only texmf.cnf lives in /etc/texmf.cnf; other are symlinks to it.
Do you have a symlink in /etc/share/texmf/web2c as well?
Well, I have with a standard-SUSE-10.0 teTeX only
/etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf and neither of those others.
To find the texmf.cnf,
I've followed the instructions listed at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation, but it won't quite
give. The problem is that I use the Gentoo installation setup as a base
and have the latest ConTeXt installed in /usr/local/share. Does anyone
know what options to pass to pdftex's
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
I've followed the instructions listed at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation, but it won't quite
give. The problem is that I use the Gentoo installation setup as a base
and have the latest ConTeXt installed in /usr/local/share. Does anyone
know what
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
I've followed the instructions listed at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation, but it won't quite
give. The problem is that I use the Gentoo installation setup as a base
and have the latest ConTeXt installed in /usr/local/share. Does anyone
know what
On 11/28/05, Nikolai Weibull
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've followed the instructions listed at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation, but it won't quite
give. The problem is that I use the Gentoo installation setup as a base
and have the latest ConTeXt installed in
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
I've followed the instructions listed at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation, but it won't
quite give. The problem is that I use the Gentoo installation setup
as a base and have the latest ConTeXt installed in
I have once tried to set up TeX on gentoo, and found this to be the
most complicated and least user-friendly distribution I have ever
seen. There's a bunch of texmf-trees in all kinds of bizarre
locations, and a symlink farm in /etc like you wouldn't believe, and
there's not a shred of
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Tobias Wolf wrote:
There are loads of errors remaining (in the version from tug.org) like
the following, which is also present in the atpragma mode:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
to be read again
}
\tabulatecontent ...NR \HL \NC \type
Tobias Wolf wrote:
But on the other hand, Hans, why can't I compile the PDFTex docs
because I don't have this (
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2004/006705.html )
What version of the pdftex manual? The latest one in
the CVS has this around line 350:
% We use adobe metrics instead
Original Message
Subject: [pdftex] pdftex 1.30.0
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 22:54:55 +0200
From: Martin Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDF-TeX mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[http://sarovar.org/download.php/673/pdftex-1.30.0.zip]
The pdfTeX team is happy to announce the release
Hartmut Henkel wrote:
Then the CMBX12 font coming with the embedded test.pdf would match
CMBX12 and this would be replaced by cmtt10.pfb. So it seems that
something must be wrong with the map file.
There is a (fairly serious) bug in two of the context-supplied Latin
Modern .map files:
Hartmut Henkel wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Vit Zyka wrote:
I noticed the next strange behaviour. Let us create very simple file test.tex:
--
\font\bf=cmbx12
Normal text. \bf Bold text.
\end
--
Now include this file by plain pdftex:
--
\pdfximage
Hans Hagen wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
PS. I can create a series of slides that show internals of the
font reading process for the ntg meeting, if you are interested.
sounds like a good idea to me
For those of you who are interested in this sort of thing, I've posted
an 884-page PDF
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
De document, and sources, are available at:
http://tex.aanhet.net/temp/fontreader.pdf
http://tex.aanhet.net/temp/fontreader.zip
Beware, the PDF is pretty large (7.7Mb). MetaPost, Perl and Context
sources are quite small (12kb), but very much a hack.
brilliant, you
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Vit Zyka wrote:
I noticed the next strange behaviour. Let us create very simple file test.tex:
--
\font\bf=cmbx12
Normal text. \bf Bold text.
\end
--
Now include this file by plain pdftex:
--
\pdfximage{test.pdf
Janko Hauser wrote:
luigi.scarso schrieb:
I'm try do make something useful with Python and pdftex using swig.
Any suggestions ?
Have you looked at pytex? It does nothing with pdftex, but I do not know
what do you want to actually do.
__Janko
luigi.scarso schrieb:
I'm try do make something useful with Python and pdftex using swig.
Any suggestions ?
Have you looked at pytex? It does nothing with pdftex, but I do not know
what do you want to actually do.
__Janko
___
ntg-context mailing
I'm try do make something useful with Python and pdftex using swig.
Any suggestions ?
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Hartmut Henkel wrote:
Please remove the blank after the :
hm, i ran intro something like that recently, pdftex was never sensitive to
blanks there, so i have map files with blanks (since there can be blanks
everywhere i see no reason for a restiction there); makes the file more readable
Hans
Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi Hans, happy new year!
When do you think you could provide us a mswincontext.zip
that includes pdfTeX 1.20b ?
when i have a pdftex 20b binary
Hans
I was asking for this on comp.text.tex
and Hans Fredrik Nordhaug just
Hi,
During this conversation I visited also CTAN. Indeed there is a 120b
version in FPTEX.
Willi
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi Hans, happy new year!
When do you think you could provide us a mswincontext.zip
that includes pdfTeX 1.20b
Willi Egger wrote:
Hi,
During this conversation I visited also CTAN. Indeed there is a 120b
version in FPTEX.
that's the november b-beta
anyhow, before i can regenerate zips i need to clean up some trees (i now have
to move from texlive to my local trees for updating since tex liv eis frozen
Hi Hans, happy new year!
When do you think you could provide us a mswincontext.zip
that includes pdfTeX 1.20b ?
Steffen
Willi Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Steffen,
if my installation is not yet outdated:
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.20a-2.2 (Web2c 7.5.3)
ConTeXt ver
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi Hans, happy new year!
When do you think you could provide us a mswincontext.zip
that includes pdfTeX 1.20b ?
when i have a pdftex 20b binary
Hans
-
Hans Hagen
Hi,
I am thinking about downloading the big complete mswincontext.zip
(context/install/mswincontext.zip).
Does it also include pdfTeX 1.20b ?
I just want to be sure before starting a day long 56k-modem-download.
Thank you,
Steffen
P.S. Happy new year
about downloading the big complete mswincontext.zip
(context/install/mswincontext.zip).
Does it also include pdfTeX 1.20b ?
I just want to be sure before starting a day long 56k-modem-download.
Thank you,
Steffen
P.S. Happy new year!
___
ntg-context
Hi Steffen,
On top of what I said just a couple of minutes ago:
On the TEXlive DVD there is a root/context folder. Herunder there is a
minimal distribution of CONTEXT. This distribution offers also Scite. I
do not know what the advantage of the 120b version compared to 120a
version of pdfTeX
Peter Schröder wrote:
Does anyone have experience (success or horror stories) regarding the
inclusiong of flash content in pdf files?
http://www.pragma-ade.com/itdemos/internal/media/mediashow.pdf
it runs ok in acrobat 6, but somehow not in (at least my installation of)
acrobat 7, so there is
The Thanh Han wrote:
Sounds very interesting, unfortunately I don't have acrobat reader to
enjoy it, since AR is not avail for the platform I am using (linux on
powerpc). Sigh.
Thanh
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 02:04:46PM +0100, Pawel Jackowski wrote:
CV Radhakrishnan wrote:
I am interested in it
is missing:
ENCFONTS = .;$TEXMF/fonts/enc//
I still think this information should be listed in the NEWS file of
pdftex -- you are one of the fine guys one should ask for things like
these, right?
As an aside, a surprising observation: When using a cont-en.efmt
generated with pdftex 1.20a
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Salvete,
I tried upgrading to pdfTeX 1.20a on my powerbook. I built the
binaries successfully and placed them and their pool files into some
temporary location and I was able to build ConTeXt formats.
Unfortunately, pdftex.map was not found, generated files have
101 - 200 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
