In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], gwicks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I have changed the subject heading, to reflect the topic.
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Spare GC or SGC?
Well ... 2 years
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 12:05 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta membership
Yes, it obviously very difficult to get a response back from members who
have left.
Quanta is small enough for most of the departed
Please excuse my use of this forum for the following message to any quanta
members who may be monitoring this users list:
With the June/July 2005 issue of Quanta Magazine, those members who normally
renew in July will have received a Renewal Due letter which requests that
you complete the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 19:15:47, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:48:49, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 at 21:33:07, P Witte wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman writes:
I did check it out, and it looks great! My problem is not with your form,
but that I dont think the questions have been well enough thought
through,
and that was not your department.
Can the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:48:49, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The London Group have a couple of repair jobs for you at the Byfleet
meeting next week :-)
Noted. I have a rehearsal in Berkhamsted at 16:30 so I
Even better than that with my 1920 x 1200 :)
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:08 PM, Tony Firshman wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 01:50:03, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 01:14 22/11/2004 +, you wrote:
1680 wide screen.
Must be a wet dream for many
and it is often on my lap (8-)#
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 11:49:39, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
TF 1640 x 1050 screen
Even better than that with my 1920 x 1200 :)
Sounds like boasting in the showers (8-)#
... but this is on my laptop.
Nasta made a lovely comment once.
I said he ought to keep his emails to one
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 19:15:47, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:48:49, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The London Group have a couple of repair jobs for you at the
On 21 Nov 2004 at 4:30, Tony Firshman wrote:
I think after his comments, I really don't feel like putting myself out
at all.
Tony (and David!) as I said in an earlier email, don't punish this
community in its entirety because of one (or several) disparaging comments
made on/off this list.
On 21 Nov 2004 at 1:13, Tony Firshman wrote:
PS I hope the Quanta committee will comment. I would be happy to finish
the code if they will use it.
On the subject of the formn isn't that one written by the canadian
Paragraph?
Wolfgang
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 10:02:50, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Nov 2004 at 4:30, Tony Firshman wrote:
I think after his comments, I really don't feel like putting myself out
at all.
Tony (and David!) as I said in an earlier email, don't punish this
community in its
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 10:20:07, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Nov 2004 at 1:13, Tony Firshman wrote:
PS I hope the Quanta committee will comment. I would be happy to finish
the code if they will use it.
On the subject of the formn isn't that one written by the
At 04:30 21/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Tony wrote
The -whole- point of doing the on-line survey was to get someone on the
Quanta committee to say they would like to use the form.
A forlorn hope I am sure.
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of
On 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09, David Tubbs wrote:
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of general interest to many and surely particularly so for
traders.
Yes of course, why didn't I think of that? Why don't you, Tony, make this
available on your
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:18:38, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09, David Tubbs wrote:
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of general interest to many and surely particularly so for
traders.
Yes of
Tony Firshman schrieb:
OK - I have put my money where my mouth is:
http://www.firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
The form is the only thing there that works so far.
I would appreciate comments, especially to complete the drop down lists.
Some are -very- incomplete! I have added two extra items to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 18:58:08, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
I have only had two people
Hi Tony,
Guess what, Safari was interpreting your page perfectly and Firefox was
being a bit generous. It turns out it is an easy fix (and very easy
not too see). Here is what I found.
Original code:
Do you subscribe to the QL mailing list?
input type=radio name=mailing value=yesYes
Either this email is intended to make us all feel really good about how
our day is going or to show that you always have backup plans (won't
even ask about the spare rear doors :) ).
Cheers,
jim
On Nov 21, 2004, at 12:23 PM, Tony Firshman wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09:20, David Tubbs
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 12:27:49, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Either this email is intended to make us all feel really good about how
our day is going or to show that you always have backup plans (won't
even ask about the spare rear doors :) ).
Not just rear doors (8-)#
Mind
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:48:49, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The London Group have a couple of repair jobs for you at the Byfleet
meeting next week :-)
Noted. I have a rehearsal in Berkhamsted at 16:30 so I will be leaving
a bit before 15:30.
Ken Brickwood - can you please
Now that is what I call service.
The reason I was wondering about the memory size has to do with users
who have a modified QL with hard drive or Rom disk who might want to
run QDT. While relatively compact, once you start putting alternate
backgrounds (screen sizes/themes) and tons of icons,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 13:25:24, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Now that is what I call service.
The reason I was wondering about the memory size has to do with users
who have a modified QL with hard drive or Rom disk who might want to
run QDT. While relatively compact, once you
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 00:23:42, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
comments to present survey version:-
Section 2, I suggest that use for faxing might be in a section on how
electronic communication is achieved - QL modem or other means.
Also what other computer system might be in use
At 01:14 22/11/2004 +, you wrote:
1680 wide screen.
Must be a wet dream for many
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
On 20 Nov 2004 at 1:10, Tony Firshman wrote:
OK - I have put my money where my mouth is:
(what you bought more beer?)
http://www.firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
The form is the only thing there that works so far.
BUT YOU CAN'T SUBMIT IT
(...)
What year did Quanta start?
1984
Tony Firshman wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 20:13:18, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message - From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
BTW is it now policy not to send the mag to advertisers? The last one
- Original Message -
From: Duncan Neithercut
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Quanta membership
Geoff - I thought you are a committee member : customer care would
suggest that you should offer to get the potential new member
contacted by the correct Quanta
Mike MacNamara
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David Tubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership Survey
At 01:10 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Nice one Tony. Action better than words
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
It looks like my attempt to inject some positiveness into the issue has
fallen flat.
I should have gone to bed instead.
Pity.
Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido
Hi,
Tony Firshman wrote:
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
You shouldn't be. You have done your best.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
Add 1 to that number. I'm not a Quanta member and I have no intention to
become one.
It looks
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 17:43:45, François Van Emelen wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman wrote:
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
You shouldn't be. You have done your best.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
Add 1 to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Firshman wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 17:43:45, Francois Van Emelen wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman wrote:
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
You shouldn't be. You have done your best.
I have only had two people commenting
- Original Message -
From: SMSQ - Jochen Merz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
Tony Firshman wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 20:13:18, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED
At 09:39 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
There was another mainboard by a guy in Sawston Cambs ?
Other add ons - Eprom Progger, A/D Converter
Nome brewed stuff
I thought drunk Nomes sat in gardens (8-)#
Tony
Such a dismissive response !
I do beg your pardon, never mind, run the whole thing for a
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 18:12:10, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 09:39 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
There was another mainboard by a guy in Sawston Cambs ?
Other add ons - Eprom Progger, A/D Converter
Nome brewed stuff
I thought drunk Nomes sat in gardens (8-)#
Tony
Such a
Hi Tony,
Just trying to catch up - had taken a quick glance but wasn't quite
clear on if you were asking for input on the form itself or wanting
people to fill it in - now I understand.
It would be a shame if this form was not used. I had looked at the
Quanta location and, believe me, with
At 18:24 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
You are touchy David. Maybe too much Nome brew (8-)#
I was joking about your mistyping only.
OK, a typo - big deal ! Surely the Tinkerers have been adding bits of their
own making ?
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I don't
Tony Firshman writes:
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
It looks like my attempt to inject some positiveness into the issue has
fallen flat.
I should have gone to bed instead.
Pity.
I
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 11:19:18, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi Tony,
Just trying to catch up - had taken a quick glance but wasn't quite
clear on if you were asking for input on the form itself or wanting
people to fill it in - now I understand.
It would be a shame if this
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
- Original Message -
From: Duncan Neithercut
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 18:58:08, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
It looks
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 20:38:55, P Witte wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman writes:
I did check it out, and it looks great! My problem is not with your form,
but that I dont think the questions have been well enough thought through,
and that was not your department.
Can the form be
By the way, as to the form, the final line shows Do you subscribe to
the QL mailing list? Yes No (see and then stops there. See what?
You must have seen a version I was editing.
The form does not stop there
Interesting. In Apple's Safari, I emptied the cache and reloaded it -
quit in the
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 16:04:43, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
By the way, as to the form, the final line shows Do you subscribe to
the QL mailing list? Yes No (see and then stops there. See what?
You must have seen a version I was editing.
The form does not stop
At 21:59 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I
don't matter.
Who said that? I certainly didn't.
Tony
OH YES YOU DID !
I still have nothing from the people that matter
Added to which both my considered responses merited no comment at all.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 23:53:47, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 21:59 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I
don't matter.
Who said that? I certainly didn't.
Tony
OH YES YOU DID !
I still have nothing from the
My first post to this list myself - hello from San Francisco. I had
been interested in even just becoming a member of Quanta but when I
contacted whomever was provided as the membership contact I never got
a response. Don't know what sort of time commitment Quanta committee
membership would be,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 03:56:47, Delwin Vriend wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
My first post to this list myself - hello from San Francisco. I had
been interested in even just becoming a member of Quanta but when I
contacted whomever was provided as the membership contact I never got
a response.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 16:59:33, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hmm.
Quanta Membership Sec did not respond to my requests to renew, has lapsed
for a few years now. Never got any response.
I hope that whoever on the Quanta committee reads this (John G and Geoff
for two!) will
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 16:59:33, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hmm.
Quanta Membership Sec did not respond to my requests to renew, has lapsed
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 20:13:18, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message - From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 16:59:33, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hmm
signing anyway)
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of gwicks
Sent: 19 November 2004 20:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
always supported the QL, and was most miffed by this and the quality
of the 'management'
Regards
Mike MacNamara
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 01:10:53, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
OK - I have put my money where my mouth is:
http://www.firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
The form is the only thing there that works so far.
I would appreciate comments, especially to complete the drop down lists.
Cool! I know when I was just out of high-school with the QL in
Edmonton, AB (Canada), I was very much alone with my QL. So good to
know its not complete isolation here. :-)
Caught me by surprise! Another QL person in northern California?
Hi Delwin, I am down in Redwood City and Tim is over
58 matches
Mail list logo
