- Original Message -
From: David Tubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta AGM
One of my Quanta jobs is to co-ordinate show dates - pity Quanta doesn't set
an example by informing me of their plans!
Best
Tony
The AGM 200g will be held on weekwnd of 8th April. That is the week before
Easter, the next after that is St George's Day and the next after that is
the May Bank Holiday so it is really the only one available.
Regards
Sarah
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 5:55 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta AGM
Just in case no one else replies, there is at the moment no date fixed for
the 2006 Quanta AGM. There will be an invitation for
On Mon, 9 May 2005 at 23:14:35, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I have at last got around to getting the show photos on line:
http://firshman.co.uk/showphotos/Quanta-agm2005/
I need help with a couple of names.
On Mon, 9 May 2005 at 00:11:02, John Southern wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Monday 09 May 2005 00:04, Tony Firshman wrote:
I need help with a couple of names.
Unknown. I am forgetting names in my old age. Help -- Roy Kempton?
Thanks.
There is another:
.. :-((
Darren.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Firshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 May 2005 14:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta AGM 2005
On Mon, 9 May 2005 at 00:11:02, John Southern wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Monday 09 May 2005 00:04, Tony Firshman wrote:
I
Re:
I have an address label he gave me in an old diary at home, but that's in
Wicklow 200 miles from here while the house his being done up.. :-((
Darren
Serves you right you rampant two-house capitalist! ;)
John in Wales
PS I'm chuckling about the RSM at Sandhurst who, when asked
On Mon, 9 May 2005 at 21:12:10, hitchies wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re:
I have an address label he gave me in an old diary at home, but that's in
Wicklow 200 miles from here while the house his being done up.. :-((
Darren
... and quite a few have told me it is John Moody
Tony
--
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I have at last got around to getting the show photos on line:
http://firshman.co.uk/showphotos/Quanta-agm2005/
I need help with a couple of names.
Well that was Barbara not Julia!
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill,
On Monday 09 May 2005 00:04, Tony Firshman wrote:
I need help with a couple of names.
Unknown. I am forgetting names in my old age. Help -- Roy Kempton?
John S
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Geoff Wicks wrote:
I was surprised that there had been no comment re. the special
resolutions - I think that the new clauses 5.3 - 5.6 are a very
bad idea and will be voting against the resolution.
(If I was a conspiracy theorist I might read something into the
fact that they are not
- Original Message -
From: John Hall
To: QL Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta AGM
I was surprised that there had been no comment re. the special
resolutions - I think that the new clauses 5.3 - 5.6 are a very bad
idea
Tarquin Mills wrote:
Questions.
1. What would Geoff Wicks do differently as leader?
2. Why should I approve Special Resolution 2 when they can have
enough members by co-opting?
3. Why should I approve SP1 when it stops the top posts changing
democratically (new clause 5.3), and the
On Monday 28 March 2005 17:58, Tarquin Mills wrote:
Questions.
1. What would Geoff Wicks do differently as leader?
2. Why should I approve Special Resolution 2 when they can have
enough members by co-opting?
3. Why should I approve SP1 when it stops the top posts changing
4. If no one else offers, as a last resort, I am happy to act as your proxy
as
long as you direct me to which way you want to vote.
John S
John, is there a mechanism for people to request a copy of the current
constitution if they want it?
I'm up to date I think, there may be some who've
- Original Message -
From: Rich Mellor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 12:51 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta 2005
Just a quick comment - one of the reasons that the Quanta committee seemed
to want the QL 2005 meeting down south was because they
At 18:07 16/01/2005 +, you wrote:
Everyone seems to think that Manchester is built out of Scout Huts (or
Headquarters as we prefer to call them!)
We are already looking for a more prestigious venue for AGM 2006.
So the 2005 on the very edge of the country, almost as far away from as
many
- Original Message -
From: Rich Mellor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 12:51 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta 2005
Just a quick comment - one of the reasons that the Quanta committee seemed
to want the QL 2005 meeting down south was because they thought that
- Original Message -
From: David Tubbs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta 2005
You could start from the other end, where do members/users live ?
Select a location to suit them, the possible visitors rather than a
clique.
If you
Well, at least it is several times correct on the
last page, isn't it? :-)
Jochen
William Newell wrote:
Have just received my copy of QLToday - Nov/Dec edition and on reading the QUANTA advert was astounded to learn that Portishead has moved from Bristol to Hove or is it only the Town Hall that
Yes, Jochen,
Every is correct at the (End)
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and all Qlers
Bill.
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Merz Shareware [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QUANTA AGM 2005
Well
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 at 11:51:53, Rich Mellor wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
It is nice to know that Quanta are indeed planning on holding a big
show in 2005 to celebrate 21 years of the QL.
However, what a shame that it is to be held in Portsmouth..
I would have thought that QL 2005 should be
- Original Message -
From: Rich Mellor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 11:51 AM
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta 2005
It is nice to know that Quanta are indeed planning on holding a big show
in 2005 to celebrate 21 years of the QL.
However, what a shame that it is to
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 21:18:20 -, gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cut
Writing personally I am inclined to agree with this, but I think we
should be realistic and accept that Portsmouth is the choice.
The history was that the show was originally to be part of a weekend in
which the Quanta AGM
And if he told you he'd probably have to kill you ;-)
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
From: Duncan Neithercut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Quanta
Sorry Tarquin but I am not in posession of that exact
Duncan Neithercut wrote:
The final statement is the killer to close down the discussion at a
premature stage by requesting volunteers for an unspecified project
with no known resources and an indeterminate closure. This is
from Classic committee tactics to block something new - read the
UK
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Firshman wrote:
I have put a link on my web form to http://www.quanta.org.uk for details
of this mailing list (simply copied what was on the paper form).
Where is mention of the list? I can't see it anywhere.
politician
I expected something like this, it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Firshman wrote:
I have put a link on my web form to http://www.quanta.org.uk for details
of this mailing list (simply copied what was on the paper form).
Where is mention of the list? I can't see it anywhere.
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 at 12:44:19, Tarquin Mills wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Firshman wrote:
I have put a link on my web form to http://www.quanta.org.uk for details
of this mailing list (simply copied what was on
BTW thanks to Lau for the background. I nicked it from his site in
the
mid 90s (8-)#
Does anyone know the name of the French made floppy disk interface?
Tony
Datel?
Well done for your work on the questionnaire form, Tony.
I stayed out of this, as I've had to do a similar large info
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I have put a link on my web form to http://www.quanta.org.uk for details
of this mailing list (simply copied what was on the paper form).
Where is mention of the list? I can't see it anywhere.
I have put this link on my form:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 at 23:43:46, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I have put a link on my web form to http://www.quanta.org.uk for details
of this mailing list (simply copied what was on the paper form).
Where is
At 02:09 23/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Do try and break
http://firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
Does it not need the submit button to test breakpoint ?
How is it designed to respond to no answer re DateJoined ?
A DateOLapse ?
Anyway much easier to view now, ta.
You still don't like QEP III Qontrol
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 19:15:47, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:48:49, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL
Sorry John, but my strong belief is that, if friends or associates are
involved, it is even more important to have a legal agreement when any
kind of business and/or financial activities are involved. Otherwise,
you are risking some very hard feelings if something is not understood
or goes
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 at 17:16:38, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 02:09 23/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Do try and break
http://firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
Does it not need the submit button to test breakpoint ?
It has had a submit button (well two now) since about 2am today.
How
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 at 21:33:07, P Witte wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman writes:
I did check it out, and it looks great! My problem is not with your form,
but that I dont think the questions have been well enough thought
through,
and that was not your department.
Can the
- Original Message -
From: James Hunkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta
Sorry John, but my strong belief is that, if friends or associates are
involved, it is even more important to have a legal
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:48:49, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The London Group have a couple of repair jobs for you at the Byfleet
meeting next week :-)
Noted. I have a rehearsal in Berkhamsted at 16:30 so I
Even better than that with my 1920 x 1200 :)
On Nov 21, 2004, at 8:08 PM, Tony Firshman wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 01:50:03, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 01:14 22/11/2004 +, you wrote:
1680 wide screen.
Must be a wet dream for many
and it is often on my lap (8-)#
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 11:49:39, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
TF 1640 x 1050 screen
Even better than that with my 1920 x 1200 :)
Sounds like boasting in the showers (8-)#
... but this is on my laptop.
Nasta made a lovely comment once.
I said he ought to keep his emails to one
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 19:15:47, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:48:49, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The London Group have a couple of repair jobs for you at the
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 at 02:09:03, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
snip
Do try and break
http://firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
It is already 40k, and some 1200 lines!
The underlying code I mean.
Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
tony@surname.co.uk
Tony Firshman wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 at 02:09:03, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
snip
Do try and break
http://firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
It is already 40k, and some 1200 lines!
The underlying code I mean.
Tony
Well here it is :-) Didn't break although I overloaded
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 02:15:50 +,() Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 at 02:09:03, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
snip
Do try and break
http://firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
Well if you have written it, it won't break (if it's working of course ;-)
Seems to work for me - nice job.
jim
On Nov 22, 2004, at 6:09 PM, Tony Firshman wrote:
There are a few minor issues concerning error reporting of linked
items.
However I can see nothing wrong in the POST data on a completed form,
so
I will code the email sending tomorrow.
Hopefully tomorrow
On 21 Nov 2004 at 4:30, Tony Firshman wrote:
I think after his comments, I really don't feel like putting myself out
at all.
Tony (and David!) as I said in an earlier email, don't punish this
community in its entirety because of one (or several) disparaging comments
made on/off this list.
On 21 Nov 2004 at 1:13, Tony Firshman wrote:
PS I hope the Quanta committee will comment. I would be happy to finish
the code if they will use it.
On the subject of the formn isn't that one written by the canadian
Paragraph?
Wolfgang
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 10:02:50, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Nov 2004 at 4:30, Tony Firshman wrote:
I think after his comments, I really don't feel like putting myself out
at all.
Tony (and David!) as I said in an earlier email, don't punish this
community in its
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 10:20:07, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Nov 2004 at 1:13, Tony Firshman wrote:
PS I hope the Quanta committee will comment. I would be happy to finish
the code if they will use it.
On the subject of the formn isn't that one written by the
At 04:30 21/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Tony wrote
The -whole- point of doing the on-line survey was to get someone on the
Quanta committee to say they would like to use the form.
A forlorn hope I am sure.
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of
On 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09, David Tubbs wrote:
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of general interest to many and surely particularly so for
traders.
Yes of course, why didn't I think of that? Why don't you, Tony, make this
available on your
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:18:38, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09, David Tubbs wrote:
But I see no need for Qanta to be involved, the results of a survey (if
any) would be of general interest to many and surely particularly so for
traders.
Yes of
Tony Firshman schrieb:
OK - I have put my money where my mouth is:
http://www.firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
The form is the only thing there that works so far.
I would appreciate comments, especially to complete the drop down lists.
Some are -very- incomplete! I have added two extra items to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 18:58:08, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
I have only had two people
Hi Tony,
Guess what, Safari was interpreting your page perfectly and Firefox was
being a bit generous. It turns out it is an easy fix (and very easy
not too see). Here is what I found.
Original code:
Do you subscribe to the QL mailing list?
input type=radio name=mailing value=yesYes
Either this email is intended to make us all feel really good about how
our day is going or to show that you always have backup plans (won't
even ask about the spare rear doors :) ).
Cheers,
jim
On Nov 21, 2004, at 12:23 PM, Tony Firshman wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 14:09:20, David Tubbs
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 12:27:49, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Either this email is intended to make us all feel really good about how
our day is going or to show that you always have backup plans (won't
even ask about the spare rear doors :) ).
Not just rear doors (8-)#
Mind
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 15:48:49, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
The London Group have a couple of repair jobs for you at the Byfleet
meeting next week :-)
Noted. I have a rehearsal in Berkhamsted at 16:30 so I will be leaving
a bit before 15:30.
Ken Brickwood - can you please
Now that is what I call service.
The reason I was wondering about the memory size has to do with users
who have a modified QL with hard drive or Rom disk who might want to
run QDT. While relatively compact, once you start putting alternate
backgrounds (screen sizes/themes) and tons of icons,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 at 13:25:24, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Now that is what I call service.
The reason I was wondering about the memory size has to do with users
who have a modified QL with hard drive or Rom disk who might want to
run QDT. While relatively compact, once you
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 at 00:23:42, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
comments to present survey version:-
Section 2, I suggest that use for faxing might be in a section on how
electronic communication is achieved - QL modem or other means.
Also what other computer system might be in use
At 01:14 22/11/2004 +, you wrote:
1680 wide screen.
Must be a wet dream for many
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
On 20 Nov 2004 at 1:10, Tony Firshman wrote:
OK - I have put my money where my mouth is:
(what you bought more beer?)
http://www.firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
The form is the only thing there that works so far.
BUT YOU CAN'T SUBMIT IT
(...)
What year did Quanta start?
1984
Tony Firshman wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 20:13:18, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message - From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
BTW is it now policy not to send the mag to advertisers? The last one
- Original Message -
From: Duncan Neithercut
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Quanta membership
Geoff - I thought you are a committee member : customer care would
suggest that you should offer to get the potential new member
contacted by the correct Quanta
- Original Message -
From: Duncan Neithercut
Subject: RE: [ql-users] Quanta
SNIP
To progress this discussion a moderator or instigator needs to put
aside his/her personal individual preferences, listen to all the ideas
on the list and dismiss none, but perhaps ask some individuals
Mike MacNamara
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David Tubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership Survey
At 01:10 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
Nice one Tony. Action better than words
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
It looks like my attempt to inject some positiveness into the issue has
fallen flat.
I should have gone to bed instead.
Pity.
Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido
Hi,
Tony Firshman wrote:
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
You shouldn't be. You have done your best.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
Add 1 to that number. I'm not a Quanta member and I have no intention to
become one.
It looks
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 17:43:45, François Van Emelen wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman wrote:
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
You shouldn't be. You have done your best.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
Add 1 to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Firshman wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 17:43:45, Francois Van Emelen wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman wrote:
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
You shouldn't be. You have done your best.
I have only had two people commenting
- Original Message -
From: SMSQ - Jochen Merz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
Tony Firshman wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 20:13:18, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED
At 09:39 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
There was another mainboard by a guy in Sawston Cambs ?
Other add ons - Eprom Progger, A/D Converter
Nome brewed stuff
I thought drunk Nomes sat in gardens (8-)#
Tony
Such a dismissive response !
I do beg your pardon, never mind, run the whole thing for a
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 18:12:10, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 09:39 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
There was another mainboard by a guy in Sawston Cambs ?
Other add ons - Eprom Progger, A/D Converter
Nome brewed stuff
I thought drunk Nomes sat in gardens (8-)#
Tony
Such a
Hi Tony,
Just trying to catch up - had taken a quick glance but wasn't quite
clear on if you were asking for input on the form itself or wanting
people to fill it in - now I understand.
It would be a shame if this form was not used. I had looked at the
Quanta location and, believe me, with
At 18:24 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
You are touchy David. Maybe too much Nome brew (8-)#
I was joking about your mistyping only.
OK, a typo - big deal ! Surely the Tinkerers have been adding bits of their
own making ?
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I don't
Tony Firshman writes:
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
It looks like my attempt to inject some positiveness into the issue has
fallen flat.
I should have gone to bed instead.
Pity.
I
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 11:19:18, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi Tony,
Just trying to catch up - had taken a quick glance but wasn't quite
clear on if you were asking for input on the form itself or wanting
people to fill it in - now I understand.
It would be a shame if this
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
- Original Message -
From: Duncan Neithercut
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 18:58:08, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I am disappointed at the response to my form.
I have only had two people commenting on the content, and not from the
right quarters.
It looks
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 20:38:55, P Witte wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony Firshman writes:
I did check it out, and it looks great! My problem is not with your form,
but that I dont think the questions have been well enough thought through,
and that was not your department.
Can the form be
By the way, as to the form, the final line shows Do you subscribe to
the QL mailing list? Yes No (see and then stops there. See what?
You must have seen a version I was editing.
The form does not stop there
Interesting. In Apple's Safari, I emptied the cache and reloaded it -
quit in the
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 16:04:43, James Hunkins wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
By the way, as to the form, the final line shows Do you subscribe to
the QL mailing list? Yes No (see and then stops there. See what?
You must have seen a version I was editing.
The form does not stop
At 21:59 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I
don't matter.
Who said that? I certainly didn't.
Tony
OH YES YOU DID !
I still have nothing from the people that matter
Added to which both my considered responses merited no comment at all.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 23:53:47, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 21:59 20/11/2004 +, you wrote:
I thought only to make an intelligent contribution, but evidently I
don't matter.
Who said that? I certainly didn't.
Tony
OH YES YOU DID !
I still have nothing from the
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 03:56:47, Delwin Vriend wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
My first post to this list myself - hello from San Francisco. I had
been interested in even just becoming a member of Quanta but when I
contacted whomever was provided as the membership contact I never got
a response.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 16:59:33, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hmm.
Quanta Membership Sec did not respond to my requests to renew, has lapsed
for a few years now. Never got any response.
I hope that whoever on the Quanta committee reads this (John G and Geoff
for two!) will
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 16:59:33, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hmm.
Quanta Membership Sec did not respond to my requests to renew, has lapsed
- Original Message -
From: John Taylor
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta
snip
There has been little or no evidence of any interest in what the
committee are doing and as a consequence the committee have shown very
little interest in what the members are doing.
Perhaps Quanta has the sort of
John Taylor wrote :
I like the way all the ideas about what Quanta should be in the future
are developing. Haven't we heard it all before?
and
Believe me, none of the proposals are original, they have all been
discussed and muted, in some cases, several times.
and
What is wanted is someone
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 20:13:18, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message - From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 at 16:59:33, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hmm
signing anyway)
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of gwicks
Sent: 19 November 2004 20:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
always supported the QL, and was most miffed by this and the quality
of the 'management'
Regards
Mike MacNamara
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta membership
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 at 01:10:53, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
OK - I have put my money where my mouth is:
http://www.firshman.co.uk/scripts/qq.cgi
The form is the only thing there that works so far.
I would appreciate comments, especially to complete the drop down lists.
Cool! I know when I was just out of high-school with the QL in
Edmonton, AB (Canada), I was very much alone with my QL. So good to
know its not complete isolation here. :-)
Caught me by surprise! Another QL person in northern California?
Hi Delwin, I am down in Redwood City and Tim is over
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
as is Sinclair QL World (it's ISSN is still current publication
status), BTW Arcwind still exist and are publishing other mags from
their old address.
Windsurfing magazines by any chance?
Yes
ISSN numbers are free and available from the
British Library, the are
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 at 19:55:29, John Impellizzeri wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
on 11/12/2004 4:13 PM, Tony Firshman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 at 18:59:37, Tarquin Mills wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I have been trying BBS on my Q60 resently, I will put the results on
According www.issn.org the international centre for ISSN numbers
in
Paris, of the 1 million periodicals it has registered, Quanta
magazine
is not one of them. QL Today (English, German and Welsh ;-) versions
are)
Welsh??? When did we ever apply for a Welsh one???
as is Sinclair QL World
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
