...
Junction=roundabout isn't enough?
Bye
Giuliano
Richard Mann ha scritto:
I'd tend to agree that noname=yes is the wrong approach, but maybe there
should be something like roundabout=yes, since that is positively useful
information.
Richard
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Pieren pier
You maybe ain't going to like this, but the usual distinction in the UK is
that residentials are (typically) 6m+ wide and have pavements/sidewalks,
whereas service is for urban roads which don't have pavements/sidewalks.
Richrd
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On
These short-distance signposted routes can be tagged as lcn (local cycle
network) relations.
I'd prefer there to be a distinction between these (which I think of as
leisure/tourist routes and would call tcn) and utility routes into a town
centre, but there isn't a distinction at the moment (and
On public land you can usually push a bike and be treated as a pedestrian,
but that's not always the case on private land (eg the University Parks in
Oxford) - bicycles are banned altogether.
So there is a distinction, but it can probably be achieved by using
bicycle=no for situations where
The problem is when some people use spaces and some underscores. Tagwatch
can't tell them apart.
Richard
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
but one underscore is more than
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
you're suggesting how to tag that a path is commonly
used by bicycles - there isn't a tag for that!
I'm only about a year into trying to find a decent answer to this question
(how to tag informal bike paths). I know
at 9:59 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
While we're about it, there's a few other potential values for cycleway
(for interest mainly):
cycleway=buslane (shared with buses)
Has potential.
cycleway=filterlane (explicitly shared with nearside-turning traffic
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
highway=path for rough paths
highway=footway for paved paths
But how would you expect this to solve the current problem? Do you
think it's just a matter of tweaking some wiki definitions?
Also, with the above
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
Real cycleways with official signs are an obstacle to me that I need to
avoid.
I know German cyclists are fast, but treating cycleways like motorways is
ridiculous :)
But seriously, you have a point - usability by bikes should be on
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
My point is: There is an important difference between
- a real, official cycleway (prohibited by law for others)
- some way that looks like it was pretty much suitable for cycling
About like the difference between
- a road marked
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
highway=path+access=no+bicycle=designated for the former and
highway=path+bicycle=yes for the latter.
Each to their own, but I'd prefer:
highway=cycleway+designation=official_cycleway (or whatever) (for those
officially
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.comwrote:
In bare bones basic, Steve, are you for or against using highway =
cycleway for officially marked cycleways only? That's what I would
like to
poissonerie, surely?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jonathan Bennett
openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
Fishmonger has a slight advantage in that it translates into French as
Poissionerie, German as Fischhändler, Italian as Pescivendolo, and so on.
If the sidewalks are next to the road, and in Europe, you can probably
rely on people assuming them by default (unless you advise otherwise).
Clearly in other places, it may be necessary to tag them explicitly.
Richard
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote:
On Wed,
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com wrote:
I think this is a HUGE improvement over what Google Maps shows:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.82372lon=-97.20104zoom=16layers=B000FTF
Tyler
Yup, the parking lots give you a real feel for the place.
Richard
the :number roles are obsolete (you should order the relation members
instead - probably using JOSM)
The English definition of the forward/backward roles is correct. If
the relation is one-way, and the direction of the way is the same,
then use forward. If the direction of the way is opposite,
Nathan - there's some form of setting in your email account that means
that every time you reply to a thread we see a new thread starting
(dropping the Re: prefix, maybe?). This makes it very hard to follow
the thread, as the emails get out of order.
On the specific example, in the UK these would
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
On the specific example, in the UK these would be tertiarys: an
ordinary street that serves a through or within-city
The first one is motorway_link, the second primary (because it's
two-way), the third primary_link, the fourth could be just about
anything from trunk to service. Mapnik makes a mess if a link
intersects a service, but that's cos Mapnik renders a trunk_link under
a service, which is wrong. The
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
The simplest is probably to call the fourth
a trunk with a note that there's a case for it being a trunk_link, but
that trunk is more renderer-proof.
That seems incorrect, and hence tagging (incorrectly) for the
work.
Richard
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:11 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/18 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
The first one is motorway_link, the second primary (because it's
two-way), the third primary_link, the fourth could be just about
If you say football in en-GB then you mean the game run by the
Football Association in England, and by FIFA internationally. If you
say Rugby, you mean whichever of the two codes is dominant in your
part of the country / social circle (and probably Rugby Union by
default). At least the ball's the
The only thing missing on the wiki, as far as I could see, was
something sensible for American Football. It is not sensible to use
football for American Football, since the most likely meaning if
someone tags sport=football (in spite of the wiki advice not to) is
that they mean Association
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:56 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 June 2010 19:34, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
football for American Football, since the most likely meaning if
someone tags sport=football (in spite of the wiki advice
The fashion in the UK is now to impose 20mph speed limits on each and
every street, rather than create zones with entries/exits. It amounts
to much the same thing in the end, but it means that we simply put:
maxspeed=20 mph+maxspeed:note=Oxford 20 mph zone
(the whole city is a 20mph zone except
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:01 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/6 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
maxspeed=20 mph+maxspeed:note=Oxford 20 mph zone
I'd suggest to use source:maxspeed instead of note, as I think it is
already widely used
There are 6695 landuse=grass in the UK. They're not turf farms.
surface=grass is for highways
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Bennett
openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
On 13/07/2010 07:37, char...@cferrero.net wrote:
How might I go about tagging the often quite extensive green
2010 20:47, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
There are 6695 landuse=grass in the UK. They're not turf farms.
surface=grass is for highways
surface=* isn't just for highways any more... because landuse=grass is
silly, as Jonathan pointed out, grass isn't a use
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com wrote:
I think a combination of motorroad=* and grade_seperated=* would do
grade_separated please (ie with an a in the middle)
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Can't find it on the wiki - do you have a ref?
Richard
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:30 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 July 2010 07:26, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
1300 uses worldwide, against 1.9m for surface=
So a wiki entry that says
I think surface started as a binary paved/unpaved for roads (with
paved assumed by default, and paved meaning tarmac), and has got
extended to cover cobbled roads, and (subsequently) as a way of adding
more info for tracks/paths.
So for most purposes, the principal distinction is between paved
I've updated the wiki page to try to explain it more clearly. I've
included Martin's paved=yes flag (though personally, I'd probably just
make it clear in the table that some values such as concrete should be
treated as paved)
Richard
___
Tagging
I don't think we're reaching any consensus that key:paved is an idea
to be positively recommended, so I think it's probably best to record
it in the wiki as some people do this.
I think the wiki would also benefit from a few notes saying which
values should be treated as paved (in the sense of
Layers don't work when there are area/way conflicts, because the norm
for rendering is to draw areas first then ways on top. So you have to
have a flag that says this way isn't really on top. We have a
perfectly adequate flag for this function (tunnel=yes), but people
objected to using that for
How would you like it rendered? Covered-as-in-a-shopping-mall is quite
different to covered-as-in-protected-from-the-rain. The real problem
is that it's scope is too broad.
Richard
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:11 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/20 Richard Mann
Most vineyards have something similar, though not always so heavily
marketed, so I think you need to find a term that's more
international. Perhaps tourism=vineyard_shop or just shop=vineyard.
Richard
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:15 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 July 2010
winery: no such word in en_gb, we just use vineyard for the whole
operation (though of course we don't do these things on the same scale
as Australia). Unless you're going to distinguish between shop=winery
and shop=vineyard, I'd use the more generic term in the tagging
system.
Richard
Most of these call themselves vineyards
http://www.englishwineproducers.com/scvineyard.htm
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
can you provide a definition of this use of the word?
___
Tagging mailing list
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Good idea, or just a local fix?
Richard
Personally, I think the easiest to fix many issues would be to draw a
specific polygon
Dave F (et al),
Renderers draw roads (typically) by drawing a wide grey line on each
segment, a grey circle at each node, then a narrower (say) white line
on each segment, and a white circle at each node. All you see of the
grey is a thin line on each side of the white line: this is the
casing.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Shouldn't the layer_change be on the common point, not a way? A way
(usually) has two ends, so putting the tag on a way will not indicate at
which end of the way the layer change takes place. But then it degenerates
to
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 26/07/2010 14:07, Richard Mann wrote:
If you draw the
grey in the correct layer, then you get little semi-circular arcs of
grey at the end of bridges (if they are layer=1).
I've never noticed this in Mapnik
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Yes, but human mapping time is a far more scarce resource then computer
working time. So let the computer fix it. Preprocess!
Computer working time is rarely the limiting resource (otherwise we'd
all have been out of a job long
Pre-processing isn't really an option for Kosmos, Maperitive,
MapCSS/Halcyon (and judging by the number of rendering tags it spawns)
Osmarender.
Rendering is not something that only the gods do, there are tools
arriving that will make it a lot lot easier to render. When these
people render, they
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:27 AM, James Livingston
li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
Someone mentioned
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
up-thread, is there anything it doesn't cover? I've been using it for over a
year, although I haven't mapped any
Daniel
cycleway=shoulder looks like a good idea for those countries that
routinely have a wide shoulder on country roads (I've seen them in
Ireland; they aren't common in the UK)
on urban roads (maybe even rural roads with centre lines), you could
do cycleway=tight/critical/spacious, following
Ed - the proper way to do bus routes is using relations. The operator
tag should be on the relation, and should only have one value. This is
how we deal with geolocations being part of multiple geographical
structures.
If you want to add route_ref tags to the bus stops, then just make a
single
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Sebastian Klein
basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
from what I understand, landuse is to mark a larger area that has multiple
I think it's useful to differentiate/subdivide areas where there are
noticeable changes in landuse: don't be too enthusiastic about lumping
Please: someone write a bot to add landmark=probably to every tree in
Germany, and stop this debate. If it's a landmark, then it's worth
adding a tag to say so.
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
The proper way to do it is to have separate relations in each
direction, probably named for the origin and destination (ie not
calling it the up Bristol and the down Bristol, but calling it the
Bristol-London and London-Bristol service).
Alternatively, put all the ways in one relation and put
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Fast food is simply a style of serving: you go up to the counter and
order. It has nothing to do with the cuisine.
The Italians probably don't like to think of ice-cream as fast food,
because that has connotations of
A greenfield site is one that is currently a field, so it should be
tagged as a field until it gets built on. Nothing should ever be
tagged greenfield.
A brownfield site is derelict land that was something once, but is now
nothing in particular until someone does something with it. A
brownfield
The search box is also a lot faster than opening MapFeatures. Indeed
there'd be a case for abolishing MapFeatures (and just making
MapFeatures a category).
Richard
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:59 AM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 13/10/2010 09:30, Lennard wrote:
And how
You can also test for the presence of name:de in name, rather than
just equality, so that if name contains (say) French/German/Flemish
components, then you use that rather than making your own name
(name:de) combination.
Richard
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Peter Körner
Copy what is done in Belgium.
name = Rue Bouganville - Bouganville Street
(ie removing the abbreviation)
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
maybe:
building=kiosk
shop=newsagent
and just leave it to local knowledge to know whether a newsagent
typically sells sweets/tobacco/tickets
The only one I'd have said was worth tagging individually was whether
they sell bus tickets:
bus_tickets=yes/no?
Richard
admin_level=8, as per
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Admin_level#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries
place=suburb if it's a bit of a larger urban area
place=town if it corresponds to a reasonably large standalone urban area
place=village if it corresponds to a single small
Townships are units of govt that are subdivisions of County, typically
square, population and urban form varies (to save you the trouble of
reading the wiki article he suggested you read if you don't know what
they are).
If the township contains a series of tiny places, but people do
genuinely
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Noel David Torres Taño
env...@rolamasao.org wrote:
Thanks to both. My problem is this: I have a street in a city, in a pedestrian
zone, but it is small enough to be unsuitable for cars.
Near that, I have another one, just in the limits of the urban zone (maybe
I generally agree with this approach.
When buses and bikes share a lane, I'd probably stick to cycleway=lane
for the moment, or possibly cycleway=bus_lane.
Richard
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:09 PM, esperanza espera...@no-log.org wrote:
How to tag busways ?
I added some cases in this wiki page
the trackbed I think
are not service either, they are unclassified roads to which buses only have
access - they aren't like a service road in an industrial estate or car
park.
David
On 15/11/2010 09:41, Richard Mann wrote:
I generally agree with this approach.
When buses and bikes share
HGV = Heavy Goods Vehicle. It seems to be broadly identical (give or
take a couple of tons/tonnes) with a US truck
so hgv=destination (or hgv=no) would seem to be correct
Feel free to add a note on the wiki that hgv is en-gb for truck
Or feel free to use truck=destination (or truck=no), and if
self-storage would be the usual term in en-gb
photo of one attached (not in OSM - yet)
Richard
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Ed Hillsman ehills...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Is there a recommended way to tag self-storage facilities? The closest I've
been able to find is the tag landuse=garages
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Why landuse? It's generally going to be located inside a larger
landuse area of commercial or industrial, and could be as small as a
standard office building. There is some use of
I'd take the view that amenity implies a degree of personal access,
so I reckon amenity=storage is probably sufficient rather than risk
unnecessary typos with underscores.
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
In JOSM you can add a way to a relation multiple times.
I'd be interested to see an example. Can you add nodes multiple times?
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
The Brussels cycle map (unfortunately only available in a print
version, as far as I can see) uses a coloured line on the right side
of the road for notably uphill (pink) and severely uphill (red). It
takes a bit of getting used to, but it conveys the information
reasonably efficiently.
Richard
I map both:
1) I add cycleway:left=track to the road
2) I add adjacent=yes to the highway=cycleway, so you know you can
refer to tags on the road if you prefer
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
One situation that this would not cope with, that I see surprisingly often
around here, is where there is both a lane *and* a track.
cycleway=lane with a highway=cycleway alongside, or
cycleway=track (and just treat the
The meaning and use of designated is confused and highly contested
in OSM, so I'd avoid using it for any other purpose.
I'd have said carpool ought to be a distinct value, not a key, if
you've got exclusive parking. Something like:
amenity=parking+access=carpool
Richard
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Rodolphe Quiedeville
rodol...@quiedeville.org wrote:
The problem is the acess is NOT exclusive, and I want to choose the
clearest key/value. It's easy to indicate what is exclusive but not so
easy to explain what is 'designated too' without restriction.
What
Ah - now I understand it a bit better - you mean a pick-up location.
More a kind of bus stop for carpoolers. On that model I'd probably go
for highway=carpool on a node.
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Not really, since at least half the people arriving leave their cars
there (assuming everyone drives there). So it's a parking lot that's
designated for carpool use, but also available for general parking.
I wonder if
,,1,4.23
This is a real cycleway track I think
Please post your ultimate cycleway=track !!!
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Richard Mann
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:56 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:08 AM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Does this mean that, should someone else add the cycleway to the map at a
later time, the cycleway=track tag should be removed from the motor-vehicle
road?
No. As I said earlier in this discussion, even when there are
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not tagging for the renderers but close. And you may confuse routing
applications. When I meet such (very seldom) double tagging, I always
clean-up the most undetailled or obsolete version.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/01/2011 12:20 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
The user who'd prefer to use highway=cycleway ways doesn't
know that the cycleway=track is a duplicate, but routers only have to
give a slight preference for highway=cycleway
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Like the is_in, adjacent sounds horrible for spatial applications
working with spacial database where all elements already have spatial
coordinates.
I agree for nodes and polygons. Ways next to other ways aren't
so-easily capable
24000 uses so far, so I guess it's time to put it to a vote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Designation
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
You'all are welcome to:
1) Make another proposal
2) Vote yes or no to the proposal as it stands
It's not appropriate to fine-tune the proposal during the voting stage
- you either approve or oppose it as it stands.
If there's an appropriate majority after 2 weeks, I'll move it to
approved.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:47:04 +
Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
If there's an appropriate majority after 2 weeks, I'll move it to
approved. Otherwise we'll just carry on waiting for a better idea
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Tordanik wrote:
I'm still not quite sure whether I understand what designation=*
is supposed to do.
It's to record the legal status, or designation, of a given object - whether
that object be a footpath, a
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 03/02/2011 05:01 PM, Richard Mann wrote:
I reckon the voting is running at about 24000 a handful for, and a
handful against.
Oh, come on. If you’re going to count every element tagged with
designation=* as a “vote
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Yes, I know rewriting a page at this stage isn't the Done Thing. So sue me.
Wikifiddler, first class.
;)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Relations between adjacent ways - yuk - proximity tests between
near-parallel ways are computationally horrible. It isn't adequate to
just say the two are related and hope the data consumer will sort out
the mess. The cycleway key is applied to the road to say what the
cycle facility is on that
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
The wiki should be a place to document the various parts of OSM, and for
things like software it can be useful. For tags, however, it is getting
steadily more and more complex and confusing and less and less beneficial.
I
cutting:left=yes
Rendering is, as ever, another matter.
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to tag a cutting that's only on one side of the feature? This
appears to be an example:
That'll be a very big boat
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:57 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/14 Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com:
It's Paul Johnson who introduced the tag, not Nathan.
Your comment is right, but you should point it to Paul Johnson instead.
yes,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote...
Well done Paul, for not rising to the bait.
Can we keep discussions productive please.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 June 2011 15:13, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I assumed he meant only U-turn and forward - ie no left or right
turns. I have seen that restriction once at a t-junction, where the
side street can enter the
Urban normal in the UK is 100-120mm. Raised (at eg bus stops) is about 160-200mm
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
2011-06-22 Josh Doe:
I think we're definitely going for functional. The
kerb=flush would mean that there is a kerbstone (with all the
potential for localised puddling, misalignment, settling etc), whereas
kerb=no would mean there's a continuous tarmac surface - the latter
occurs either if someone is trying to make a very smooth transition
between the road and a cycle
I would be glad if it was revived. As we get ever more detailed
imagery, people are starting to want to split roads in two at every
intersection and it makes for a right mess: I'd prefer if there was a
more elegant way of handling divided roads in towns.
The routing stuff should be smothered -
When I had a go at re-writing it, I tried to give some clarity on the
boundaries with adjacent values (residential, tertiary, track) -
without being too country-specific. I'm not sure that the deleted
sentence is particularly helpful, so I'd leave it out on the
keep-it-simple principle.
...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/27 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com:
When I had a go at re-writing it, I tried to give some clarity on the
boundaries with adjacent values (residential, tertiary, track) -
Yes, but on the other hand deleting the cited part changed the
definition and made it more
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:07 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.kohl-ratingen.de/images/kohl-markierung/z.299.jpg
That's a dropped kerb, which is probably semantically equivalent to
lowered. But dropped is the standard en-gb term.
Put the sidewalk tag on the road, and put some indicator on the
footway (I use adjacent=yes) that it's also covered by tagging on the
adjacent way.
The worst that happens is some router gets two parallel links in their
network, or that some super-clever algorithm identifies two parallel
sidewalks
I think you meant might be advised rather than need
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
If entrance=* is being used at all, you need to change your rendering to
support it, whether or not existing building=entrances are being changed.
They are called bus bays in EN-GB.
I'd probably add a suitable tag (bay=yes, maybe) to the highway=bus_stop
node (and maybe to a node on the road on the lines of busway:right=bay or
some such).
But I haven't tagged any (might be something to do with the negative value
I associate with them...)
at 09:11 +, Richard Mann wrote:
But I haven't tagged any (might be something to do with the negative
value I associate with them...)
Curious what negative value this is?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
