Once matter collapses it will still obey quantum mechanic and thermodynamic
laws. I am going to do some calculations and see what I come up with.
Once matter collapses, it is no longer part of this unicerse, and as such,
no longer obeys quantum mexhanics and thermodynamic laws.
A
*Each to its own. If the shoe fits, wear it. The spoiled baby boomer
remains a baby, needing to put someone down in vain attempts to bolster
themselves. Judgmental forays are worshiped as a commandment. However, take
care*!
To respond to a theory is a very friendly act. It shows that the theory
The act of measuring requires one to impart some energy (photons or other)
or matter upon the particle. Upon the object being measured, the object
may instantly increase in mass or change velocity. Over time this energy
will be transferred back to its environment as it evaporates...
On
I have been using black hole and singularity interchangeably and that is
confusing and inconsistent. I will refer to it as a quantum black hole
that obeys quantum mechanics:
In quantum mechanics, the black hole emits Hawking
radiationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation,
and so can
Subject was: Re: [Vo]:Re: ProdEngAssemble.avi
At 03:11 PM 8/17/2012, ChemE Stewart wrote:
If you just sell plans for poppers, electronic circuit boards and
licenses for the technology, then all of the liability rests with
the OEM's they drag in. They probably give them a short demo in the
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
John said that the original Papp engine produced boron as an ash product
and as a consequence, demonstrated relatively poor reaction efficiency.
Who observed this boron ash and where has it been corroborated?
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
The second part is inspired by Defkalion's technology but also by my
impressions
of ICCF-17 and to these I have added an overdose of wishful thinking.
And a good deal of poetry to the prose. Very good.
T
At 03:22 PM 8/17/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
In a post today integral sited a death of a LENR developer in an
explosion. The take away, LENR is dangerous when the power is high.
It is best to be as safe as you can.
When Pons and Fleischmann, in 1983, in one of their first
experiments, using a
Jed sed:
There is nothing more ephemeral that a vitally important trade secret.
Trade secrets about unimportant technology sometimes last for decades.
Stealing trade secrets is probably right up there with absconding with
military secrets.
I wish I could find a brief You-Tube clip
I would love to hear Mike's real thoughts on the the Papp engine and
whether he thinks it is an interesting /unexplained phenomenon or we are
close to a commercial product.
Its unfortunate that the Rohner boys can't play nice--Bob just shut down
all of his brother John's YouTube videos..
Bob:
Abd,
Just a thought... Papp may have known that the containment coil needed to
remain energized in order to collect and contain charged, collapsed matter
particles at the coil's inside surface that was being produced at each
cycle. Possibly when Dr. Feynman unplugged the power the collapsed
Peter,
Very nice post. As you know, I believe this reaction might have a bit of
heaven and hell locked within it.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
wrote:
The second part is inspired
On Rossi's journal someone asked a question of him about the gain of his hotter
operating ECAT. In his answer, Rossi suggested that the gain of the gas
powered unit was 3 when the gas is actively heating and infinite by definition
when in gas standby. The device is being heated by the gas
Subject was Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus
I apologise for not changing the subject header earlier.
Contrary to his earlier statements, Jojo apparently does want to have
the last word. So this is my last communication in response to him.
I'm adding his email address to a deletion file, so I
From Abd,
Contrary to his [Jojo's] earlier statements, Jojo apparently does want to
have
the last word. So this is my last communication in response to him.
I'm adding his email address to a deletion file.
What took you so long?
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
I apologize for the first part of no interest for LENR, but something
frightening
has happened- it seems that a gang of local politicians, leftists and
rightists united
have stolen or bought second hand our and try
At 04:44 PM 8/17/2012, ChemE Stewart wrote:
My singularity will rip matter apart in the near vacinity. Any
neutrons that escape it will be very low momentum, since the
singularities quantum gravity pull sucked all of the energy out of
them. It also devours them.
Stewart, this is
At 06:03 PM 8/17/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
6.2*10^7 neutrons per 5 min means 200 thousand neutrons per second.
If each one carries 1MeV, that means 3*10^-10^-8J. There's about
3*10^7s every year, which means about 1Joule of radiation emitted per year.
According to wikipedia:
The
Let's say you've got a xenon atom. It likes to absorb energy and emit
photons. You know, xenon lamps etc.
OK, so lets ask a real simple question:
When a tube filled with xenon gas has some energy pumped into it and the
electrons go to higher orbitals -- yes this happens for a very short period
I was thinking about this overnight and I think the right answer is
probably somewhere in the middle. Suppose you are able to obtain a working
LENR device containing e.g. powdered Ni or a Pd-coated cupronickel wire or
whatever. You can certainly put the active material under and SEM and a
The measuring system can either transfer energy from itself to the
system being measured or do the reverse and transfer energy from the
system being measured to itself.
harry
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:58 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
The act of measuring requires one to impart
using various spawar, nasa GRC 89/2005, toyota/mitsubishi, NI, celani,
Piantelli, Focardi, ENEA, Rubbia/DeNinno...
we are at level 3 since long...
after the 30% successful replication following FP we were at 2 (negative
replication have no meaning except it does not work).
after NASA GRC 89, we
At 06:09 PM 8/17/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
It is interesting that they claim element generation up to lead.
That also happened in defkalion's data. Check that out.
People, please start to discriminate. This is the slide show:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
we are at level 3 since long...
I'm thinking of Papp and the replicators. :) In an earlier thread I was
implicitly arguing that we had gotten to (2) and could afford look around
and kick the tires of the devices a
No need to swallow. If that were to be used as a heater, within a few
years, where people sleep, the proximity would cause deadly effects, after
a few years.
Or, in any place where they would be stored together, like in a department
store, where dozens of them would be together. It would not be
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:17 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Abd,
I will make an analogy which I am sure will gather consternation: do you
remember in ghostbusters when they closed the breaker on the containment
device housing the...gremlins?
Ectoplasmic entities and
Yes, this is why I say they are claiming. They do not show much (or
anything meaningful at all) concerning what methods are being used, or
Although, it is sort of interesting that these similar things are showing
up. Maybe a generalized contamination from overlooked common sources to
both
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:17 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Abd,
I will make an analogy which I am sure will gather consternation: do you
remember in ghostbusters when they closed the breaker on the
I agree with that. Either way you have changed the measured.
On Sunday, August 19, 2012, Harry Veeder wrote:
The measuring system can either transfer energy from itself to the
system being measured or do the reverse and transfer energy from the
system being measured to itself.
harry
On
At 06:11 PM 8/17/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
The hot fusion people and the nuclear physicist crowd will not
believe that LENR is real unless they see lots of neutrons; this is
a good political type experiment.
It hasn't worked before, why should it work now?
The main cold fusion reaction,
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Spock's reply was something to the effect that: Military secrets
are the most fleeting of all secrets.
Episode 57, The Enterprise Incident:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoUFbd9e-aY
@ 3:55
T
-
Dead Astronaut
http://www.thefoxisblack.com/2011/08/05/space-suit-of-the-week-63/
This “Dead Astronaut” is a sculpture by Brandon Vickard, and I can’t
quite figure out what is going on with this sculpture. As if
astronauts didn’t have enough to worry about (sudden loss of pressure,
At 06:17 PM 8/17/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
But that is sort of bad news too. People won't be able to have these
devices at home. It seems that there are bursts of high activity
1000x above the high limit level is way too dangerous.
What devices?
Daniel, isn't that jumping to conclusions? The
At 06:32 PM 8/17/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Not really bad news. Ed Storms came up with a theory that fusion
happen in cracks of the lattice. Summing that, with what I see in
the slides, they are thinking that a BEC of D is forced to be fused
by the fractures. So, LENR is a kind of variation of
Wise:
Andrea Rossi
August 19th, 2012 at 2:16 AM
Dear ivan:
We have decided, so far, to limit our sales to the 1 MW plants becausethis
dimension is the one that
Sweet Progress:
Rossi must be following Vortex.
Love,
Candy
ny . min
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:57:45 -0700
Wise: Andrea Rossi August 19th, 2012 at 2:16 AM Dear ivan: We have decided,
so far, to limit our sales to the 1 MW plants becausethis dimension is the one
that gives to Leonardo Corp.
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Spock's reply was something to the effect that: Military secrets are the
most fleeting of all secrets.
Arthur C. Clarke said the same thing, except he was talking about actual
military secrets. He knew quite a few of them
Why are you asking me? I am not working on any Papp engine. My hands are
full with my gen2 LENR research on Carbon Nanostructures. In fact, I want
somebody to build me one of these Papp engines so that I can free myself and
my farm factory from Raghead oil. Heck, I am even willing to
What I don’t understand is if this is possible:
1 - 4He + 4He → 8Be(-93.7kEV)
2 - Be8 - 2He4(18.074 MeV)
If this reaction is possible, and if this is what recombination is, where
does the 18 MeV come from.
Axil
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
When the
From: Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device
If you open this link:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulated-LENR-Paper.pdf
It turns out that
Defkalion is moving to Canada. Can someone comment on something I
heard which is western Canada (such as Alberta and Vancouver) have
weak laws that make running scams and frauds easier?
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Rossi is right about one thing; the
oops...
notthe same level I agree.
On papp I don't know any paper validating it's core mechanism... is there
even any description ?
2012/8/19 Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
we are at level 3 since long...
I'm
James,
I am assuming that your question is motivated by the controveral Papp
claims. While I have not had time to do more than peruse the following
speculative papers, perhaps they are relevant, but I am not sure they are
correct.
Ion trapping and sonoluminescence
ABSTRACT: Sonoluminescence is
FHPE has no normal conditions only workable conditions. Generally, they
either do not work or just work softly. But, sometimes wires and pieces of
metal explodes for God knows why reasons or just bursts of more intense
activity. Up to this result, IF that is correlated with cold fusion, I was
not
Interesting questions. Let me give it a try.
I doubt that the pressure would change very much in the case of excited atoms
since this is a gas. The pressure depends more upon the number of atoms than
their size.
The second question probably depends upon whether or not the gas is heated up
by
In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message of Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:50:51 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin stated,
Other factors to take into consideration are that a neutral black hole
would oscillate back and forth through the planet
Funny, that's exactly how electrons behave in my physical model... with the
Subject was Re: [Vo]:Some doubts expressed about Celani demonstration
At 10:43 PM 8/17/2012, James Bowery wrote:
Isn't 23 years of torture enough?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Jed Rothwell
mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.comjedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Several experts in calorimetry expressed
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 19 Aug 2012 02:31:41 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
A *gravitational singularity* or *spacetime singularity* is a location
where the quantities that are used to measure the
gravitationalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitationalfield become
infinite
On 08/16/2012 01:19 PM, Mark Iverson wrote:
FYI: this forwarded to me by a colleague...
-Mark
Trouble with Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory:
Can Fields Induce Other Fields in Vacuum?
http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0083v5.pdf
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to point out that Maxwell's
That's the final stage of his theory, which has a resonant requirement. The
longest wavlength for a cavity with 1nm is 2nm or ~500eV. This is
wavelength has a strong absorption in matter in general because it
ressonates with the inner orbitals of atoms. So, it is a highly ionizing
radiation which
At 12:51 AM 8/18/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Good calorimetry is difficult, but comparisons are not. Wouldn't it
be sufficient to demonstrate two parallel implementations, one with
an unprocessed CONSTANTAN wire and no H2, one with a processed wire
and H2, and measure the difference using the
At 02:02 AM 8/18/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
So I understood, but then the flip side: why the questions about the
calorimetry? Again, what am I missing?
I've answered before but these responses are delayed.
What you are missing, Jeff, is that Celani's work isn't conclusive,
by any means.
Thanks. Very much appreciated (both of them).
Jeff
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 02:02 AM 8/18/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
So I understood, but then the flip side: why the questions about the
calorimetry? Again, what am I missing?
I've
I have always wondered exactly what happens to matter that is heading directly
toward the singularity. Doesn't time for the matter slow down due to the
intense gravity to such a degree that it appears to stop in mid path at the
horizon from our observation perspective?
Dave
-Original
No likely to be true. Both paths should have the same yields.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 4:43 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Question About Conservation of Energy In Plasma Transitions
What I don’t
I think the concept of one field generating the other in space as the wave
advances is defective. In my way of thinking it is not possible to stop a wave
in motion and perform a test of this nature.
You would need to travel faster than light to get to an observation point that
allows this.
At 10:14 AM 8/18/2012, Eric Walker wrote:
On Aug 17, 2012, at 18:28, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Widom Larsen postulate that the neutrons are produced when a
proton captures an electron. The process is endothermic (energy
must be supplied or it will not occur) so the neutrons
Mark,
I absolutely agree that they will want to fall to earth, i just do not
agree that micro black holes will necessarily zoom directly thru the earth.
At 23 micrograms, about like a grain of sand, the smallest predicted mass
of one at a planck length, I more pictured it acting like ball
I read it too. The work has also been published in an influential
peer-reviewed journal, JETP (Journal of Experimental and Theoretical
Physics), a leading Russian journal also published in English:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/rup025083t105q83/
It is hard to know what to make of this. It
Where is the reference to noble gas engine technology?
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Mint Candy m.ca...@gmx.us wrote:
Sweet Progress:
Rossi must be following Vortex.
Love,
Candy
ny . min
Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:57:45 -0700
Wise:
Andrea Rossi
August
2.5MJ/automobile battery http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density
1 hour at 107 horsepower http://www.plasmerg.com/_files/Cert.pdf
2.6MJ/battery;1hour;107hp?battery http://www.testardi.com/rich/calchemy2/
([{2.6 * (mega*joule)} / battery]^-1 * [1 * hour]) * (107 * horsepower) ?
battery
=
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 4:43 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I doubt that the pressure would change very much in the case of excited
atoms since this is a gas. The pressure depends more upon the number of
atoms than their size.
While true, that is different from the statement I
From: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 4:09:07 PM
Subject: [Vo]:110 automobile batteries to power the Oklahoma Noble Gas Engine?
2.5MJ/automobile battery
1 hour at 107 horsepower
= 110.47821 battery
Hah!
It was actually 1 hour 6 minutes .. so add another 10
Do you expect to see 107 HP for an hour with a automobile sized battery? I
have a larger one that powers a small johnboat and it is lucky to run for a
couple of hours at much less power. You need a special deep discharge type to
have a chance of any serious power over time from what I have
At 10:55 AM 8/18/2012, ChemE Stewart wrote:
I think the invention was real, powerful and very uncertain and
unreliable, prone to failures, malfunctions and explosions, nature
of the beast.
No. Papp demonstrations did not normally fail. That's a myth.
The demonstration that Feynman
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com\
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 4:46:13 PM
While you're at it, calculate the diameter of the 3-wire extension
cord needed to power it from the mains!
107 hp = 78.7 KW / 120 V = 655 Amps
https://wiktel.com/standards/ampacit.htm
Highest gauge listed = =
At 11:03 AM 8/18/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
This is a certificate of an independent and legally witnessed test
of the Papp engine by two independent witnesses in 1983.
http://www.plasmerg.com/_files/Cert.pdfhttp://www.plasmerg.com/_files/Cert.pdf
Right. Stuff like this is why I bifurcate this
At 12:15 PM 8/18/2012, James Bowery wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Note that this could be parallel with Jospeh Papp. Papp apparently
planted red herrings in his patent applications, things that he knew
would
At 01:27 PM 8/18/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Hello Akira,
I can't see any bad news.
If I'm correct, Miley's team reports a much more robust reaction than
previously seen, along with a variety of extremely anomalous
transmutations.
Where is the report? Miley's reports of
Just more UNCERTAINTY
On Sunday, August 19, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 12:15 PM 8/18/2012, James Bowery wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:
a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Note that this could be parallel with Jospeh Papp. Papp
At 02:36 PM 8/18/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
The efficiency of a gas electric generator is about 33%. If the Cop
of a Rossi reactor is 3, that means that the Rossi plant is about
the same cost wise as a straight up gas burner.
When gas is used to fire the Rossi reactor, the overall efficiency
At 04:39 PM 8/18/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I think the point of (b) in the original message was that today's
posting by Rossi talks about a 1MW plant using the future tense.
Which seems to conflict with some prior statements by Rossi.
Yes, I noticed that. Of course, he can always say it was
At 05:36 PM 8/18/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Oh yes he is! His influence is seen in most of the new experiments
reported at ICCF17. Most of the authors give him credit. If it turns
out his results are fake it will ironic, to say the least.
I've seen massive deception play a major role in
At 07:30 PM 8/18/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I am curious about the weak and erratic comment. What about
evidence like this -
At 07:39 PM 8/18/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Thanks for writing this, I was also scratching my head trying to
figure out whether Godes and W-L were saying the same thing or not.
Minor comment: I think you typo'd 782MeV when meaning 782KeV.
Yes. Thanks.
They are not saying the same thing,
Shirley, you're joking Mr. Feynmann!
Feynmann: Stop calling me Shirley.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com\
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 4:46:13 PM
While you're at it, calculate the diameter of the 3-wire extension
http://pesn.com/2012/08/18/9602162_My_Visit_to_Inteligentry/
My Visit to Inteligentry
Even the usually supportive Sterling D. Allan of Pure Energy Systems News
is asking hard questions. The entire area is in a herding cat’s type of
predicament. The Rohner business plan is something that an
Famous last words...
That's a fair comment. Let me try it a different way.
If you look at the Dash paper at ICCF, they appear to give quite specific
directions about preparation of the material. This in contrast to Celani,
Schwartz, Rossi, and Godes, who do not give such directions, as best I
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Subject was Re: [Vo]:Some doubts expressed about Celani demonstration
At 10:43 PM 8/17/2012, James Bowery wrote:
Isn't 23 years of torture enough?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Jed Rothwell mailto:
Le Aug 19, 2012 à 6:20 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com a écrit :
http://pesn.com/2012/08/18/9602162_My_Visit_to_Inteligentry/
Is it normal to mount the electronics on the engine block like that? Even
though it not understood to heat up like a normal engine, I understand that it
still gets
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 5:29:35 PM
So, Feynman would have needed to yank out 3 1-inch diameter extension
cords.
None of the reports indicate whether the Papp engine was running under load or
not.
I do not believe this engine will ever make it to market. When it is
working as designed it is destroying itself, much in the way that a wire
that shows the anomalous heat effect is considered a successful result just
before the wire becomes embrittled and breaks apart.
On Sunday, August 19,
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The calorimetry problem should, for the purposes of cold fusion, have been
solved by now -- not just technically but economically.
The calorimetry problem was solved in 1848. Every single person associated
with this field, including me, knows exactly how
Abd,
Firstly, cheer up a bit.
Way too much hostility.
The proceedings paper is at:
Surface Effect for Gas Loading Micrograin Palladium for Low Energy
Nuclear Reactions LENR
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWSPROFESSORS/pdf/LENR%20Korea%20ProceedXX.pdf
They sound quite confident
At 07:43 PM 8/18/2012, Eric Walker wrote:
I am not in a position to assert an opinion here, but the impression
I get is that the evidence for transmutations to stable isotopes is
solid; see Ed Storms's book for a good discussion. An important
difficulty, however, is that the amounts detected
Indeed, small traces of transmutations (e.g. Pd—Ag, Ti—Vd and Ni—Cu) may
be explained by neutron production in light element fusion reactions.
Afterall Fleischmann thought that he saw some neutrons, although there were
no where near enough of them to be statistically significant or what is
I don't think Mike is likely to make any announcement soon He said
enough on the stage at TeslaTech
As to the videos, John may not know that YouTube is obligated to obey
a DCMA take-down notice, but that he can file a counter-claim and
presumably YouTube will then restore the
I haven't verified that Rossi actually wrote this. If he did, That is
lamer than anything I've ever seen from Rossi. He may be completely
losing it. So to speak, the clowns have empty boxes, they will fill
with our small e-cats. Therefore we won't sell small e-cats. That'll
show them!
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
I don't think Mike is likely to make any announcement soon He said
enough on the stage at TeslaTech
That's too bad for us, but understandable.
I listened to a shorter version of the TeslaTech video once
Is there a design for this $50,000, 2 man-month high temperature
calorimeter? It sounds like a design could be created by a large number of
people.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The calorimetry problem
I think the Be-8 ground state decay to 2 He-4 is at about the 93 KeV
figure. Not the higher figure. Where did you get 18 MeV?
My understanding is that 4D - Be-8 + about 47.6 MeV, which is
initially as a nuclear excited state. Some of that may be emitted as a
series of photons. If the Be-8
I sited this link in my poat, you must have missed it.
http://everything2.com/title/proton-proton+chain
See the PPIII section at the end of list.
Cheers: Axil
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
I think the Be-8 ground state decay to 2 He-4 is at
The engines, by report, don't run hot. Warm, at most. Not a problem
for electronics.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le Aug 19, 2012 à 6:20 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com a écrit :
I wish we had more guys looking over these Papp engines to determine whether or
not they are real. The concept is interesting, and of course there are
problems that need resolution before quantity production could be considered.
I have been thinking of the behavior of a crossed field device
In reply to Alan Fletcher's message of Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:08:43 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
From: Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device
If you open this link:
That PESN report gives me practically no confidence. So they've sold
the poppers before they are ready to ship any? Has anyone seen an
Inteligentry popper function? They are announcing the availability of
engines at an upcoming show, but the mfrs. haven't seen a running
engine?
The most
That paper certainly didn't cheer me up. Indeed it made me very sad.
Myonic fusion? Yes, I know what they meant. The paper reads like it
was written with Voice Recognition software, without editing, more or
less off-the-cuff, by someone who knows a lot but is utterly
disorganized.
The
97 matches
Mail list logo
