The BMW UUC Digest Volume 2 : Issue 546 : "text" Format Messages in this Issue: Re: Need reputable tire installer in Akron, Ohio arae Re: English Re: English English English Re: English puddin' Re: English <OT> English Re: English Re: The facts about the bubble car Re: English Re: Identifying Source of Noise Re: English
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:07:21 -0800 (PST) From: Richard Dorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John Weese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: Need reputable tire installer in Akron, Ohio arae Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- John Weese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gruppe, > > My son lives in Akron, Ohio and to date he has been unable to find a good > tire installer that he can trust mounting high performance tires on his M3 > wheels (which are "perfect"). He wants to keep them that way. He had a bad > experience already with one of the Tire Rack's recommended installers. > Personally, I find it extremely difficult to find a savy person that gives a > damn about expensive wheels and tires when it comes to mounting tires and > balancing wheels. I understand his dilemma. Where did he have the bad experience? There are a couple of places depending on how much money he wants to spend and how far he wants to travel. The closest one where I have personal experience is Triplett Tire Depot (1589 Triplett Blvd, 44306, (330) 784-9549). The owner is Ken Baker. The place isn't much to look at but they were pretty careful with my M3 rims and track wheels and they are one of the least expensive places I know of and easily located in Akron. Have your son stress to the owner his concerns and I would imagine they will take extra precaution and your son should request that the owner handle his rims. This is a Tire Rack recommended installer and have good reviews on the Tire Rack website (4 1/2 stars from 30 reviews with 4 stars for cleanliness being the lowest part...like I said, not much to look at). The other place is in Medina and it is called MotoMotion (6378 Norwalk Rd, Medina, OH 44256, 800-725-2330). This is one of the best places in Ohio and I know of a number of dealerships that use them with their most difficult wheels (Corvette run flats, M Coupe and M3 wheels, etc.). It costs around $15 per wheel here for mounting and balancing). They have done a number of wheels for me and they too are a Tire Rack recommended installer with all five stars based on 58 responses. They use Corghi equipment and have a beautiful showroom, clean shop, etc.). If your son wants "perfection", this is the place to go to, no question. www.motomotion.com > Anyone know of s trustworthy place in Akron, Ohio or nearby region? If I can be of further help to your son directly, let me know as I live in Akron as well. Regards, Rich ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:38:52 -0800 From: John Bolhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:31:47AM -0500, Rob Levinson * UUC Motorwerks wrote: > Or, "Bob's Quick Guide to the Apostrophe, You Idiots!" can be found > here: > > http://www.robertlevinson.com/lol/bobsquickguidetotheapostrophe.gif This one is so popular, it's now available in poster form: http://angryflower.com/aposter.html As for me, I'm just glad that my BMW's wipers work so well, as it's been raining a lot here lately. -- "It is an honor to be Cookie Monster." -Sesame Street spokeswoman Audrey Shapiro ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:19:10 -0800 (PST) From: Neil Deshpande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rob: I thought the question was a joke. I guess I was wrong. I'll put it down to a cultural thing and play the foreigner card! Here is one that maybe you can clarify. I grew up saying, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating," but most people I come across here say, "The proof is in the pudding." Does this mean, the proof of a cook's skill is in the eating of his pudding and the cook, etc., are all assumed? Is it a completely different saying from what I'm talking about? I've even challenged some of my friends on this and they seem convinced they are correct. To me "my" version is easy to understand, a pudding is "proved" when it tastes good upon eating. ??? Neil Deshpande 22/31 Indian, 9/31 American P.S. Learned (learnt) nothing from "Eats Shoots and Leaves," but was reminded of a Nevil Shute book that I greatly enjoyed via a quotation in it. *** Rob Levinson * UUC Motorwerks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ralphs = more than one Ralph. "I just met four Ralphs standing in a corner and discussing themselves. Must be a Ralph Convention." Ralph's = Ralph owns the following thing. "I backed my truck into Ralph's BMW." Ralphs' = Many (or all) of the Ralphs that exist own the following thing. "The Ralphs' greatest consternation is thinking that a barking dog is calling them." ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:32:54 -0800 From: Tom Kosmalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tim Toohey '89 325is -the pot calling the kettle black (I probably threw a comma where I should not have, or ended a sentence in a preposition. We'll, jee, aht leest klose you're parenthetical staytmints!! :-) :-) Tom K. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:37:57 -0800 From: Tom Kosmalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Also, I know Ralph well, and his car is blue (like Rob's beautiful M5 Touring), NOT red. Tom K. (finding any excuse to avoid starting on a really boring work project) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:45:09 -0600 From: Scott Staewen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Neil Deshpande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: English puddin' Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Neil, The version you grew up saying is the correct one. What you've heard here is a corrupted version, though I'm not sure who exactly did the corrupting. It's ambiguous, but is meant in the same way, i.e., results cannot be assumed, they must be tested (or *tasted* :) ) Scott Staewen > Here is one that maybe you can clarify. I grew up > saying, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating," > but most people I come across here say, "The proof is > in the pudding." Does this mean, the proof of a > cook's skill is in the eating of his pudding and the > cook, etc., are all assumed? Is it a completely > different saying from what I'm talking about? > > I've even challenged some of my friends on this and > they seem convinced they are correct. To me "my" > version is easy to understand, a pudding is "proved" > when it tastes good upon eating. > > ??? > > Neil Deshpande 22/31 Indian, 9/31 American > > P.S. Learned (learnt) nothing from "Eats Shoots and > Leaves," but was reminded of a Nevil Shute book that I > greatly enjoyed via a quotation in it. > > *** > > Rob Levinson * UUC Motorwerks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ralphs = more than one Ralph. "I just met four Ralphs > standing in a corner and discussing themselves. Must > be a Ralph Convention." > > Ralph's = Ralph owns the following thing. "I backed > my truck into Ralph's BMW." > > Ralphs' = Many (or all) of the Ralphs that exist own > the following thing. "The Ralphs' greatest > consternation is thinking that a barking dog is > calling them." > Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > __________________________________________________________________________ > In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA. > > UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate > Short Shifter - accept no substitutes! > 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:18:34 -0500 From: "Rob Levinson * UUC Motorwerks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neil Deshpande" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [UUC] English > Rob: > > I thought the question was a joke. I guess I was > wrong. I'll put it down to a cultural thing and play > the foreigner card! A "foreigner" that speaks English better than many Americans gathers little sympathy. ;-) > Here is one that maybe you can clarify. I grew up > saying, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating," > but most people I come across here say, "The proof is > in the pudding." Does this mean, the proof of a > cook's skill is in the eating of his pudding and the > cook, etc., are all assumed? Is it a completely > different saying from what I'm talking about? > I've even challenged some of my friends on this and > they seem convinced they are correct. To me "my" > version is easy to understand, a pudding is "proved" > when it tastes good upon eating. Details about that here: http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20020903.html That situation is one in which an actual quote from Bileau/Cervantes that has meaning in and of itself is truncated and abbreviated, becoming a euphemism. "The proof is in the pudding" can either be assumed to include a parenthetical reference to how it tastes, or simply without meaning at all but having the understanding of meaning that it must be used to be tested. Euphemisms themselves get "special dispensation" regarding literal meaning. Another example includes "he ripped me a new one" referring to a browbeating or beratement as harshly equivalent to having another subintestinal orifice installed (one assumes involuntarily), yet the forced rendering of such opening is assumed. The expression does not directly mention the new fecal egress, nor does it literally mean that such a thing was done. The stand-alone expression "he ripped me a new one" would have no meaning to someone unfamiliar with the euphemism. Another example is from England itself, where they have two expressions which are similar yet effectively opposite. One can say something that is superbly good is "the dog's bollocks" but when something bad or repugnant is suddenly presented, the exclamation is "bollocks!" As an aside, "bollocks!" is a cross-cultural cousin to the Simpsons-inspired "Doh!" (which is distinctly misused and abused when apostrophe-infatuated Americans write it as "D'oh!" for no logical reason). These bollocks-inspired expressions refer to nothing having to do with testes (bollocks being the slang word for one's two-veg componentry), neither human nor canine. The reasoning is even more shrouded in myst regarding the distinction of dog testes being the only good sort, far superior to the generic variety. Nonetheless, as euphemisms the meaning is clear to those that employ them. Explanation of euphemisms aside, the sloppy usage of "could care less" is not excused; it is not sufficiently euphemistic to excuse it as a complete opposite-meaning phrase deliberately used to amplify via absurdity (e.g. "Yeah, she's hot" when referring to a woman of hideous appearance). > P.S. Learned (learnt) nothing from "Eats Shoots and > Leaves," but was reminded of a Nevil Shute book that I > greatly enjoyed via a quotation in it. "Learnt" itself is a carryover from the somewhat less-constructed English prevalent 500 or more years ago. As past tense of "to learn", it is rightly "learned". The "learnt" or "learn'd" is a very pre-Shakespearian construct that has bottom-fed through the years in certain English-speaking locales like an etymological coelocanth. - Rob ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:24:29 -0600 From: Timothy J Toohey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Subject: <OT> English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> While we're on the topic of the English language I'd like to quickly vent my frustration on two other misused words. By no means do I consider myself an expert on the English language, nor am I infallible when composing email, but I frequently see the following words used incorrectly. your = Your BMW drives like a dream. you're = Be sure that you're taking the right path. lose = I can't stand it when the Vikings lose. loose = When young children have a loose tooth, they tend to play with it until it falls out. Tim Toohey '89 325is -the pot calling the kettle black (I probably threw a comma where I should not have, or ended a sentence in a preposition. p.s. Coelacanth is spelled c-o-e-l-a-c-a-n-t-h. ;P http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=coelacanth Rob Levinson * UUC Motorwerks wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Neil Deshpande" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [UUC] English > > > >>Rob: >> >>I thought the question was a joke. I guess I was >>wrong. I'll put it down to a cultural thing and play >>the foreigner card! > > > A "foreigner" that speaks English better than many Americans gathers little > sympathy. ;-) > > > >>Here is one that maybe you can clarify. I grew up >>saying, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating," >>but most people I come across here say, "The proof is >>in the pudding." Does this mean, the proof of a >>cook's skill is in the eating of his pudding and the >>cook, etc., are all assumed? Is it a completely >>different saying from what I'm talking about? >>I've even challenged some of my friends on this and >>they seem convinced they are correct. To me "my" >>version is easy to understand, a pudding is "proved" >>when it tastes good upon eating. > > > > Details about that here: > http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20020903.html > > That situation is one in which an actual quote from Bileau/Cervantes that > has meaning in and of itself is truncated and abbreviated, becoming a > euphemism. "The proof is in the pudding" can either be assumed to include a > parenthetical reference to how it tastes, or simply without meaning at all > but having the understanding of meaning that it must be used to be tested. > > Euphemisms themselves get "special dispensation" regarding literal meaning. > Another example includes "he ripped me a new one" referring to a browbeating > or beratement as harshly equivalent to having another subintestinal orifice > installed (one assumes involuntarily), yet the forced rendering of such > opening is assumed. The expression does not directly mention the new fecal > egress, nor does it literally mean that such a thing was done. The > stand-alone expression "he ripped me a new one" would have no meaning to > someone unfamiliar with the euphemism. > > Another example is from England itself, where they have two expressions > which are similar yet effectively opposite. One can say something that is > superbly good is "the dog's bollocks" but when something bad or repugnant is > suddenly presented, the exclamation is "bollocks!" As an aside, "bollocks!" > is a cross-cultural cousin to the Simpsons-inspired "Doh!" (which is > distinctly misused and abused when apostrophe-infatuated Americans write it > as "D'oh!" for no logical reason). These bollocks-inspired expressions > refer to nothing having to do with testes (bollocks being the slang word for > one's two-veg componentry), neither human nor canine. The reasoning is even > more shrouded in myst regarding the distinction of dog testes being the only > good sort, far superior to the generic variety. Nonetheless, as euphemisms > the meaning is clear to those that employ them. > > Explanation of euphemisms aside, the sloppy usage of "could care less" is > not excused; it is not sufficiently euphemistic to excuse it as a complete > opposite-meaning phrase deliberately used to amplify via absurdity (e.g. > "Yeah, she's hot" when referring to a woman of hideous appearance). > > > >>P.S. Learned (learnt) nothing from "Eats Shoots and >>Leaves," but was reminded of a Nevil Shute book that I >>greatly enjoyed via a quotation in it. > > > "Learnt" itself is a carryover from the somewhat less-constructed English > prevalent 500 or more years ago. As past tense of "to learn", it is rightly > "learned". The "learnt" or "learn'd" is a very pre-Shakespearian construct > that has bottom-fed through the years in certain English-speaking locales > like an etymological coelocanth. > > - Rob > > Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA. > > UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate > Short Shifter - accept no substitutes! > 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com > ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:41:21 -0500 From: "Bill Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jesus Rob, slow day at the Ultimate Performance Components factory today? Oh and you misspelled coelacanth...............<8^P Bill Matthews no apostrophes were used in this email. If it contains any they are not mine. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Levinson * UUC Motorwerks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:18 PM Subject: Re: [UUC] English >> <Big snip> > "learned". The "learnt" or "learn'd" is a very pre-Shakespearian > construct > that has bottom-fed through the years in certain English-speaking locales > like an etymological coelocanth. > > - Rob ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:53:01 -0800 From: "Marco Romani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: The facts about the bubble car Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> E30 M3 fanatics can't be reasoned with. I think part of their brain has been removed or they were beaten as children. It's just a fooking car. sheesh Marco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [UUC] The facts about the bubble car On Feb 16, 2005, at 11:15 AM, Steve Nash wrote: > I like Ben's version better. :-) > > -Steve > 1989 M3 - If I ever sell it, they can do as they please... > > Ben Keyes wrote: > >> you can go to the S14.net forums to read about it, not sure >> which specific thread, but it can't be hard to find. what I've >> gleaned from the E30 M3 SIG discussion (before the >> topic was correctly shut down by Fillipo) is : >> 1 - car was sold (price not disclosed) >> 2 - new owner took it to the track, then decided that >> "it needed more power" >> 3 - new owner bought the $15k 2.5l S14 that has been >> on Turner's web site for sale for a long time. >> 4 - new owner's shop can't (couldn't ?) get the motor to >> run (or even start ?) and spent time arguing with Turner's >> shop about it. resolutin unknown. >> 5 - all sorts of S14-nistas have their panties in a wad >> about how it's a horrible thing which is being done to >> a perfect car, it's awful to drive nice M3's on track, Gary >> should be shot for selling the thing in the first place, modifying >> such a perfect car is grounds for execution, blah, blah, blah with >> all sorts of useless bullsh!t like that. >> a lot of this is apparently very nasty off-list harrasment of >> Gary and at least one other owner of a low mileage car >> which is being modified for auto-x use and really makes >> one why the f*ck some people think that they have the right >> to berate others for how they choose to spend their money >> and time, but that's what happens when you give people >> a computer & impunity from personal contact or thought. >> let's try to keep that sort of crap off the list here, go watch >> the children fling their feces at each other on the forums >> if you want that sort of thing. >> Ben >> owns no M3's, doesn't care what other people do with >> their cars & their money... > Search the > ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > ___ > In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW > CCA. > > UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate > Short Shifter - accept no substitutes! > 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com > > Sincerely, Mark Gold Sacramento Chapter BMWCCA 916-852-6533 (home) 916-743-7153 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] __________________________________________________________________________ In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA. UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate Short Shifter - accept no substitutes! 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:54:20 -0800 From: "Marco Romani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I dunno. I like to use the word "f*ck" in place of commas. Marco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Levinson * UUC Motorwerks Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 6:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [UUC] English THANK YOU! I don't get why so many people misuse that expression. It's meaningless the wrong way, yet it is built of common words. Where is the misunderstanding for those that say it like that? Now if we could make people understand that using excessive apostrophization does not get them frequent-flyer miles, we'd be set. For those unsure - err on the side of caution, only use the apostrophe for possession. Please stop using it for pluralization. Many BMWs are built. My BMW's color is blue. Simple. - Rob On Feb 17, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Roger Langille wrote: > ->could care less what anybody does with any of their cars, too busy >> worrying about mine > > > The expression is correctly "couldn't care less", meaning one is > enormously indifferent. It is frequently mis-stated. If one "could > cares less", then one actually DOES care. i.e. you are capable of > caring LESS. > > Roger Search the ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] __________________________________________________________________________ In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA. UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and home of the Ultimate Short Shifter - accept no substitutes! 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:34:54 -0800 From: JKerouac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Identifying Source of Noise Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Is that 'irregardless' of 'witch of it(apostrophe)s transmission gears its in? Barry John wrote: >With all of this talk of using proper English please excuse mine. I am >trying to identify a low frequency noise. The car is a '91 535i auto 210,000 >mi. Motor mounts, trans mounts and factory reman trans are two yrs old, just >replaced driveshaft, sub frame and final drive, and trailing arm bushings, >cleaned and replaced axle boots. I have Koni SA dampers with Eibach sport >springs, Racing Dynamics sways. The noise is kind of like a helicopter >approaching from a distance and occurs at around 40 mph, it is not >noticeable at any other speeds. It did diminish somewhat after replacing >driveshaft-sub frame bushings. I have tried two sets of wheels and tires and >there is no change. The rear bearings seem smooth, I have not replaced >exhaust hangers. I do not know what else to look at. Any suggestions will be >appreciated! Thanks, >John Hoverson >91 535i >97 540i > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:51:44 -0800 (PST) From: wy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected], "'Rob Levinson * UUC Motorwerks'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: English Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> According to my "Colonial English", > > Ralph's car is red? is the shorthand for "Ralph 'is' car is red" the "correct" use of 's is such "Ralph's angry" > > Or, > > Ralphs' car is red? > the s' means that the car belongs to Ralph But I may be wrong if it is American English, which I know little of except for slangs.. > Literally challenged in Houston, > > Paul A. Garnier > Systems Integration > FastNetworking > 281-827-0725 cell/pgr > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Rob Levinson * UUC > Motorwerks > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 8:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [UUC] English > > > > THANK YOU! > > I don't get why so many people misuse that > expression. It's > meaningless the wrong way, yet it is built of common > words. Where is > the misunderstanding for those that say it like > that? > > Now if we could make people understand that using > excessive > apostrophization does not get them frequent-flyer > miles, we'd be set. > For those unsure - err on the side of caution, only > use the apostrophe > for possession. Please stop using it for > pluralization. > > Many BMWs are built. My BMW's color is blue. > Simple. > > - Rob > > On Feb 17, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Roger Langille wrote: > > > ->could care less what anybody does with any of > their cars, too busy > >> worrying about mine > > > > > > The expression is correctly "couldn't care less", > meaning one is > > enormously indifferent. It is frequently > mis-stated. If one "could > > cares less", then one actually DOES care. i.e. you > are capable of > > caring LESS. > > > > Roger > > Search the > ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, > founder of the BMW CCA. > > UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and > home of the Ultimate Short > Shifter - accept no substitutes! 908-874-9092 . > http://www.uucmotorwerks.com > > > > Search the > ARCHIVES:http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, > founder of the BMW CCA. > > UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning and > home of the Ultimate > Short Shifter - accept no substitutes! > 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com > ===== Get Firefox! __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ------------------------------ End of [bmwuucdigest] digest(13 messages) **********
