dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9 and add Stream.ReadExactly polyfill, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9 and add Stream.ReadExactly polyfill, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9 and add Stream.ReadExactly polyfill, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9 and add Stream.ReadExactly polyfill, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9 and add Stream.ReadExactly polyfill, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run tests on .NET 9, #1019 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] SWEEP: Rename BeforeClass/AfterClass to OneTimeSetUp/OneTimeTearDown, #1016 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SWEEP: Rename BeforeClass/AfterClass to OneTimeSetUp/OneTimeTearDown, #1016 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SWEEP: Rename BeforeClass/AfterClass to OneTimeSetUp/OneTimeTearDown, #1016 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SWEEP: Rename BeforeClass/AfterClass to OneTimeSetUp/OneTimeTearDown, #1016 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Intermittent Failing Test: Lucene.Net.Search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites.TestMaxClauseLimitations() [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Intermittent Failing Test: Lucene.Net.Search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites.TestMaxClauseLimitations() [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Intermittent Failing Test: Lucene.Net.Search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites.TestMaxClauseLimitations() [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Intermittent Failing Test: Lucene.Net.Search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites.TestMaxClauseLimitations() [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Intermittent Failing Test: Lucene.Net.Search.TestMultiTermQueryRewrites.TestMaxClauseLimitations() [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove SetLength from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove SetLength from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove SetLength from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove SetLength and SetEmpty from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove SetLength and SetEmpty from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove SetLength and SetEmpty from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove SetLength and SetEmpty from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove SetLength and SetEmpty from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove SetLength and SetEmpty from ICharTermAttribute, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IAttribute and ICharTermAttribute method changes, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IAttribute and ICharTermAttribute method changes, #1038 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Expressions.JS: Mask off 63 from shift operand, #1034 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions.JS: Bitwise left shift bugfixes, #1034 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] API: Review to ensure IDisposable is being used correctly and disposable pattern implemented correctly [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] API: Review to ensure IDisposable is being used correctly and disposable pattern implemented correctly [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Use upload-artifacts@4 GitHub action task, #1046 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use upload-artifacts@4 GitHub action task, #1046 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Remove upload-artifact v3 GitHub Actions task [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [ACTION REQUIRED] Removal of v3 artifact actions on December 5th Jacob Wujciak
  • Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Removal of v3 artifact actions on December 5th Paul Irwin
• [PR] Enable TestICUFoldingFilterFactory.Test [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable TestICUFoldingFilterFactory.Test [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Known Failing Tests on Lucene.Net [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Known Failing Tests on Lucene.Net [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Known Failing Tests on Lucene.Net [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] File Handle Leak in SearchFiles demo and LargeInputFST test code [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] File Handle Leak in SearchFiles demo and LargeInputFST test code [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] File Handle Leak in SearchFiles demo and LargeInputFST test code [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] 4.8.0-beta00018 Documentation Changes [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix csharpsquid:S1117 SonarCloud warnings about shadowing fields with variable names [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix csharpsquid:S1117 SonarCloud warnings about shadowing fields with variable names [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix csharpsquid:S1117 SonarCloud warnings about shadowing fields with variable names [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix csharpsquid:S1117 SonarCloud warnings about shadowing fields with variable names [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix csharpsquid:S1117 SonarCloud warnings about shadowing fields with variable names [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Proposal: Drop .NET Standard 2.1 target [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Drop .NET Standard 2.1 target [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Drop .NET Standard 2.1 target [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Drop .NET Standard 2.1 target [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Fixed encoding provider loading on .NET Framework (for .NET Standard 2.0 target) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixed encoding provider loading on .NET Framework (for .NET Standard 2.0 target) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixed encoding provider loading on .NET Framework (for .NET Standard 2.0 target) [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Drop net6.0 target and use net6.0 to run netstandard2.1 tests, #1020 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Remove SetLength from ICharTermAttribute [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove SetLength and SetEmpty from ICharTermAttribute [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Target netstandard2.0 for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target netstandard2.0 for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target netstandard2.0 for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target netstandard2.0 for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target netstandard2.0 for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Suppress netstandard1.x warning for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Suppress netstandard1.x warning for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Suppress netstandard1.x warning for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Suppress netstandard1.x warning for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Suppress netstandard1.x warning for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Suppress netstandard1.x warning for Lucene.Net.CodeAnalysis projects [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Replace lucene.testSettings.config references with lucene.testsettings.json [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace lucene.testSettings.config references with lucene.testsettings.json [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Investigate feasibility of running tests on Android and iOS for MAUI compatibility [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Investigate feasibility of running tests on Android and iOS for MAUI compatibility [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Test Failure: Lucene.Net.Expressions.JS.TestJavascriptOperations (TestBitShiftLeft() and TestBitShiftRight()) on .NET Framework [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test Failure: Lucene.Net.Expressions.JS.TestJavascriptOperations (TestBitShiftLeft() and TestBitShiftRight()) on .NET Framework [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test Failure: Lucene.Net.Expressions.JS.TestJavascriptOperations (TestBitShiftLeft() and TestBitShiftRight()) on x86 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test Failure: Lucene.Net.Expressions.JS.TestJavascriptOperations (TestBitShiftLeft() and TestBitShiftRight()) on x86 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix incorrect usage of argument exceptions for Sonar csharpsquid:S3928, #682 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect usage of argument exceptions for Sonar csharpsquid:S3928, #682 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] File Handle Leak [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Add comments to empty blocks to address Sonar csharpsquid:S108, #672 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comments to empty blocks to address Sonar csharpsquid:S108, #672 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove unnecessary casting from Clone() methods [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Setup tests on additional platforms that .NET Standard supports [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Setup tests on additional platforms that .NET Standard supports [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Make ReusableStringReader internal [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Make ReusableStringReader internal [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Make ReusableStringReader internal [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Make ReusableStringReader internal [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make ReusableStringReader internal [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and ICharTermAttribute/CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and ICharTermAttribute/CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and ICharTermAttribute/CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and ICharTermAttribute/CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and ICharTermAttribute/CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and ICharTermAttribute/CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Review all Encoding usage for BOM compatibility [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Review all Encoding usage for BOM compatibility [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Review all Encoding usage for BOM compatibility [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Review all Encoding usage for BOM compatibility [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and ICharTermAttribute/CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement ISpanAppendable in CharBlockArray and ICharTermAttribute/CharTermAttributeImpl [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] EncodingProvider won't load when target is .NET Standard 2.0 and runtime is .NET Framework [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] EncodingProvider won't load when target is .NET Standard 2.0 and runtime is .NET Framework [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] EncodingProvider won't load when target is .NET Standard 2.0 and runtime is .NET Framework [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] I was looking at `BitVector` to see whether it is sensible to make these into `this[int] { get; set; }` instead of (or in addition to) `Get(int)` and `Set(int)`. Being that there is a `GetAndSet()` method (much like the atomic classes), I am thinking not. [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Convert UTF8toUTF16 to TryUTF8toUTF16 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Convert UTF8toUTF16 to TryUTF8toUTF16 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Use ArgumentOutOfRangeException instead of IndexOutOfRangeException outside of indexers [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use ArgumentOutOfRangeException instead of IndexOutOfRangeException outside of indexers [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Tool to compare public API surface with Lucene [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tool to compare public API surface with Lucene [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tool to compare public API surface with Lucene [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tool to compare public API surface with Lucene [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve message for unit test failures for lucene.testsettings.json, #999 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve message for unit test failures for lucene.testsettings.json, #999 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve message for unit test failures for lucene.testsettings.json, #999 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Drop .NET 6 target [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Drop .NET 6 target [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review A-D, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TokenStream.IncrementToken() is called after Dispose() is called [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Task: Review Lucene.Net.TestFramework for Missing Features, Incomplete Features and Inconsistencies [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Task: Review Lucene.Net.TestFramework for Missing Features, Incomplete Features and Inconsistencies [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Task: Rename BeforeClass() to OneTimeSetUp() and AfterClass() to OneTimeTearDown() to match NUnit Conventions [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Task: Rename BeforeClass() to OneTimeSetUp() and AfterClass() to OneTimeTearDown() to match NUnit Conventions [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Added "Improvements" Category for Release Notes [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added "Improvements" Category for Release Notes [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BREAKING: Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review E-I, #259 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Search crash [lucenenet] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages