election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Historical apportionment biases Dan Bishop
• [EM] EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Complexity and Fairness Questions Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] apportionment, some new methods as food for thought; ossipoff&bias Warren Smith
• Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) RLSuter
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) RLSuter
• [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Chris Benham
  • [EM] RE : Re: Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Simmons' "solution" of voting system design puzzle is inadequate Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] "cycle webster" is not a divisor method hence not monotonic Warren Smith
• [EM] RE : Re: RE : Hay Voting Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Joe--thanks fsor comments Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Hay Voting Peter de Blanc
  • [EM] RE : Hay Voting Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Hay Voting Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Hay Voting Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Hay Voting Peter de Blanc
• [EM] apportionment, some replies to Ossip. and Malk. Warren Smith
• [EM] Warren: Your method Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] A good way to fit B/(q+A) to state density function Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Apportionment Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Clearinlg up an ambiguity in CW's in-cycle apportionment Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clearing up an ambiguity in the detailed instruction Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Ossipoff-Smith had better not be Adjusted-Rounding. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 1, More apportionment... Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 4, More apportionment... Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 3, More apportionment Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 2, More apportionment... Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] voting system design puzzle Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] voting system design puzzle Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Strongest pair with single transfer (method) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Strongest pair with single transfer (method) Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Strongest pair with single transfer (method) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] more on apportionment - which member of potpourri "morally best"? - about AR Warren Smith
• Re: [EM] MCA Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Clarificaton Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Small ARLO addendum Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Luxury strategy option for Condorcet Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] "Power Truncation"? Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] "Power Truncation"? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 2, More Ossipoffness... Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] More Ossipoffness... Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Kindness and generosity will not go un-thanked. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Weighted Bias-Free Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Detailed (but obvious) instructions for Adjusted-Rounding Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] GSA Forest W Simmons
• [EM] more of the unbiased apportionment method potpourri Warren Smith
• [EM] apportionment and some random Ossipoffness Warren Smith
• [EM] Correction: AR doesn't need improvement. AR is the best method. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 2, Aha, now l understand Ossipoff... MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Aha, now I understand Ossipoff... MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Credentials? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Credentials? Brandon J. Van Every
  • [EM] RE : Re: Credentials? Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Nathan Herring
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Ken Kuhlman
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Ken Kuhlman
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Noise (Was: Credentials?) Ken Kuhlman
• [EM] Where BF assumes uniform distribution MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bias-Free, contd. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Bias-Free, contd. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How unfair is distribution-caused bias? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Bias-Free MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 2, Bias-Free reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Aha, think I understand Ossipoff now (& apologize for misunderstanding...) Warren Smith
• [EM] Why Mike Ossipoff's "unbised apportionment method" cannot be taken seriously Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Why Mike Ossipoff's "unbised apportionment method" cannot be taken seriously Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Why Mike Ossipoff's "unbised apportionment method" cannot be taken seriously Ka-Ping Yee
• [EM] Huntington's apportionment paper of 1928 Warren Smith
• [EM] Part 3, Meet Warren Smith MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Part 2, Meet Warren Smith MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Meet Warren Smith MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] I propose Bias-Free, Cycle-Webster, and Adjusted-Rounding MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Cycle-Webster definition written more completely MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Apportionment method w/ unconditional unbias & pair-monotonicity MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better apportionment method, web page/paper on Warren Smith
• [EM] Typo--undefined term MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] s/q distance minimizations are incompatible with unbias. Some bias discussion. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] apportionment essay, pictures Warren Smith
• Re: [EM] Markov, etc. (correction) Simmons, Forest
• [EM] A Markov Steady State Distribution Lottery and Related Deterministic Method Simmons, Forest
• Re: [EM] voter cancellation, etc. Simmons, Forest
  • [EM] RE : Re: voter cancellation, etc. Kevin Venzke
• [EM] IEVS (exptl version) now producing Yee-type nifty pictures Warren Smith
• [EM] Some more ideas along the lines of my recent postings Simmons, Forest
• Re: [EM] voter cancellation method Simmons, Forest
  • [EM] RE : Re: voter cancellation method Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] Juho's idea Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Juho's idea Juho
  • Re: [EM] Juho's idea Juho
• [EM] http://rangevoting.org/IEVS/IEVS.c Warren Smith
• [EM] The best voting methods with honest voters Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] The best voting methods with honest voters mrouse1
• [EM] Voter Cancellation Methods Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Voter Cancellation Methods Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] A solution for incomplete preference orders mrouse1
• [EM] defining the "median voter" when the issue space is not one dimensional Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Benham "zero info strategy = honesty" criterion Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Benham "zero info strategy = honesty" criterion Chris Benham
  • [EM] RE : Benham "zero info strategy = honesty" criterion Kevin Venzke
• [EM] pseudocode for Woodall's DSC method Kevin Venzke
• [EM] A class of determinsitic methods based on non-deterministic methods Simmons, Forest
• [EM] IEVS 1.0 voting system comparator code now available - contribute code? Warren Smith
• [EM] Clariflying Adjusted Rounding definition MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 10 choice sim plots Brian Olson
• [EM] Invitation to join Colorado Voter Choice group Jan Kok
  • [EM] Invitation to join Colorado Voter Choice group Jan Kok
• [EM] Simmons cloneproof method is not cloneproof Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Simmons cloneproof method is not cloneproof Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Simmons cloneproof method is not cloneproof Chris Benham
• [EM] Forest Simmons new cloneproof simple Condorcet method Warren Smith
• [EM] Apportionment experiments (support webster) Warren Smith
• [EM] article on preferential voting jure . toplak
  • Re: [EM] article on preferential voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] article on preferential voting James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] article on preferential voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] article on preferential voting James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] article on preferential voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] article on preferential voting James Gilmour
  • [EM] RE : article on preferential voting Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : article on preferential voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] article on preferential voting Toplak Jurij
• [EM] Strategic polls in Approval Juho
  • Re: [EM] Strategic polls in Approval Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Strategic polls in Approval Juho
  • Re: [EM] Strategic polls in Approval Juho
  • Re: [EM] Strategic polls in Approval Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Strategic polls in Approval Juho
  • Re: [EM] Strategic polls in Approval Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Strategic polls in Approval Juho
• Re: [EM] Yee-Bolson diagrams and Clone dependence Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Clone Proofing Copeland Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Juho
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Juho
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Juho
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Brian Olson
  • [EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland Chris Benham
  • [EM] RE : RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland correction Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : RE : Re: Clone proofing Copeland correction Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland mrouse1
  • Re: [EM] Clone proofing Copeland Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] clone proofing Copeland Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] clone proofing Copeland Chris Benham
• [EM] Voronoi diagrams & convolutions Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Voronoi diagrams & convolutions David Cary
• [EM] About approval "equilibria" Warren Smith
• [EM] LA Times article Brian Olson
• Re: [EM] simulations Juho
• Re: [EM] carrying Warren's approval equilibrium idea to its logical conclusion Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Apportionment bias simulation Dan Bishop
• [EM] updated sims Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] updated sims raphfrk
• [EM] Re Yee/Bolson pictures Warren Smith
• Re: [EM] Range Ballots for Yee-Bolson Simmons, Forest
• [EM] RE : RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] RE : RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] RE : RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures raphfrk
  • [EM] RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Kevin Venzke
• [EM] [Fwd: Condorcet and the later-no-harm criterion] mrouse1
  • [EM] RE : [Fwd: Condorcet and the later-no-harm criterion] Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : [Fwd: Condorcet and the later-no-harm criterion] Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] RE : [Fwd: Condorcet and the later-no-harm criterion] Kevin Venzke
• [EM] RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Brian Olson
  • [EM] RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Warren Smith
• [EM] Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures raphfrk
  • [EM] RE : Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Comments on the Yee/Bolson/et.al. pictures raphfrk
• [EM] IRV-like Virtual districts raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] IRV-like Virtual districts James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] IRV-like Virtual districts raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] IRV-like Virtual districts James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] IRV-like Virtual districts raphfrk

• Earlier messages
• Later messages