election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] A delusion (reply to Ossipoff) about Condorcet methods Warren Smith
• [EM] My apologies to Brian Olsen Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren RV reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] criticisms of range voting Warren Smith
• [EM] replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: replies to Ossipoff re Range Voting; explanation of latest RV results Kevin Venzke
• [EM] 2nd Abd reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Abd reply Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Replies to various people on Condorcet vs RV Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] IEVS: range not longer always top of heap? Warren Smith
• [EM] IEVS 2.56 update on findings, status, deficiencies Warren Smith
• [EM] replies to various people re IEVS simulations Warren Smith
• [EM] Abd: Condorcet vs RV Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] "designing to the benchmark", strategy hurts Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] "designing to the benchmark", strategy hurts Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Getting carried away and claiming RV is as good as Condorcet... Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Getting carried away and claiming RV is as good as Condorcet... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Getting carried away and claiming RV is as good as Condorcet... Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] Getting carried away and claiming RV is as good as Condorcet... Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Condorcet vs RV Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] RE : Condorcet vs RV Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet vs RV Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet vs RV Dave Ketchum
• [EM] FW: The value of K, for the original method Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] range voting - better than Condorcet for purpose of generating Condocet winners... Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] range voting - better than Condorcet for purpose of generating Condocet winners... Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] Hay Voting can emulate Approval Voting Peter de Blanc
  • [EM] A more efficient strategy-free ratings-based method than Hay voting Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] range voting - better than Condorcet for purpose of generating Condocet winners... David Cary
• [EM] typo in forms of "equality" and "efficiency" Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] forms of "equality" and "efficiency" Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] A really simple, stupid usability point for 0..99 Brian Olson
• [EM] Hay voting simulated in IEVS Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting simulated in IEVS raphfrk
• [EM] what's wrong with random ballot (Hay voting) Warren Smith
• [EM] Then what's wrong with Random-Ballot? Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Then what's wrong with Random-Ballot? Peter de Blanc
• [EM] banzhaf myth Warren Smith
• Re: [EM] "Banzhaf Myth" Forest W Simmons
• [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Peter de Blanc
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Peter de Blanc
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Peter de Blanc
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Peter de Blanc
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Peter de Blanc
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Peter de Blanc
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Peter de Blanc
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Hay voting bust, busted Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Hay Voting busted Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Hay Voting busted Peter de Blanc
  • Re: [EM] Hay Voting busted raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Hay Voting busted Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Hay Voting busted Peter de Blanc
• [EM] Morally best: equal reprsentation expectation for all Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Webster clarification Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] small states really underrepresented? (Banzhaf myth) Warren Smith
• [EM] apportionment, morality & goals Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] small states really underrepresented? (Banzhaf myth) raphfrk
• [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias RLSuter
  • Re: [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias RLSuter
  • Re: [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Asset Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Asset Voting raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Asset Voting James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Asset Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Unsubscribing Don St. Jean
  • Re: [EM] Unsubscribing Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Asset Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Minmax under-representaton causes small-bias RLSuter
• [EM] What is good apportionment? Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] What is good apportionment? Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] What is good apportionment? Forest W Simmons
• [EM] "Weighted Webster", Apportionment, Moral rightness etc Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] "Weighted Webster", Apportionment, Moral rightness etc Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Advantages of the various proposals Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Weighted Webster, Warren, and I Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] Weighted Webster, Warren, and I Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Michael Poole
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Ka-Ping Yee
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Ka-Ping Yee
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] CORRECTING Black box voting repost re how HAVA imploded Dave Ketchum
• Re: [EM] Ossipoff's Weighted Webster... Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Deduction engine - maybe not worth it Warren Smith
• [EM] Ossipoff's "weighted webster" appears to be the same as my method... Warren Smith
  • [EM] approval and PR-STV raphfrk
• [EM] What I mean by Weighed Webster Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] ICC & AFB incompatible (with = allowed in votes, under weakened AFB definition version) Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] ICC & AFB incompatible (with = allowed in votes, under weakened AFB definition version) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Deduction engine idea for proving property-set incompatibilities for EMs Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Deduction engine idea for proving property-set incompatibilities for EMs Jan Kok
• [EM] Finding the constants for the approximating function Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Weighted Webster Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Oops! :-) Bias-Free's fallacy Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] FBC and ICC, when equal ranks are allowed Forest W Simmons
  • [EM] RE : Re: FBC and ICC, when equal ranks are allowed Kevin Venzke
• [EM] concise apportionment formulas Warren Smith
• [EM] Another way of wrilting Weighted Bias-Free's formula Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren: Post rules for your methods? Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] "ThreeBallot" tested by MIT students Gervase Lam
• [EM] cloning - how Woodall dealt with the issue Warren Smith
• [EM] clone confusion Warren Smith
• [EM] clone immunity definitional problems Warren Smith
  • [EM] RE : clone immunity definitional problems Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] clone immunity definitional problems Markus Schulze
• [EM] ICC dfn I posted applies to Approval. Approval fails it. Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] ICC dfn I posted applies to Approval. Approval fails it. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Non-preference ICC definition--does it go someting like this? Michael Ossipoff
  • [EM] RE : Non-preference ICC definition--does it go someting like this? Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] Tiebreaker graphs for Condorcet Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Tiebreaker graphs for Condorcet Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Tiebreaker graphs for Condorcet and other methods mrouse1
  • [EM] RE : Tiebreaker graphs for Condorcet and other methods Kevin Venzke
• [EM] clone-immunity - definition please? Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] clone-immunity - definition please? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] clone-immunity - definition please? Markus Schulze
• Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Forest W Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot) Forest W Simmons
• Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] A little simplification of bias-test Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Fine version of bias-test (small, brief modification) Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Bias definition and bias-test Michael Ossipoff
• Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Problem solved (for pure ranked ballot Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Warren Smith
  • [EM] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] Problem solved (for pure rank ballots): ICC & AFB incompatible (essentially) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ossipoff tries to define "bias" for apportionment Warren Smith
• [EM] BF and the no-minimum census apportionments Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Reply to Joe Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Joe: "Many kinds of bias"? Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Joe: "Many kinds of bias"? Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Bias measures--There really are no two ways about it Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Joe: Could you explain the question? Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Joe: Could you explain the question? Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] Unbias by definition. Quantitative bias comparisons by testing. Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 3, Warren Bias-Free Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 1, Warren Bias-Free reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Part 2, Warren Bias-Free reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren Bias-Free reply Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Warren--BF's apportionment score Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Why my methods are unbiased by accepted definition Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Why my methods are unbiased by accepted definition Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Why my methods are unbiased by accepted definition Dan Bishop
• Re: [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] NPV white paper - Condorcet flaw raphfrk
• Re: [EM] majoritarian top ratings (MTR) (sent to EM list Dec.12) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] replies to recent EM posts re apportionment & voting-design puzzle Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] replies to recent EM posts re voting-design puzzle Chris Benham
• [EM] Bias-Free in the historical census apportionments Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Clarifying Bias-Free definition Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] Clarifying Bias-Free definition Joseph Malkevitch
  • Re: [EM] Clarifying Bias-Free definition Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] Reposing a message that didn't post before Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] What have I started?! Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] What have I started?! Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What have I started?! Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] What have I started?! Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What have I started?! Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] What have I started?! Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What have I started?! Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] What have I started?! Jan Kok

• Earlier messages
• Later messages