election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Chris: Forest's FBC/ABC method (MIKE OSSIPOFF) fsimmons
• [EM] David, re: IRV. Chris, re: IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: Forest's FBC/ABC method MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Sorry--One more revision of MMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Sorry--One more revision of MMT C.Benham
• [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: how goes American PR? Ted Stern
• [EM] MMT written right MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Analysis Finds Incorrect Use of Ranked-Choice Voting in San, Francisco Ralph Suter
• [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: Andy Jennings
  • [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: C.Benham
  • Re: [EM] This might be the method we've been looking for: fsimmons
• [EM] more anti-IRV propaganda... David L Wetzell
• [EM] Analysis Finds Incorrect Use of Ranked-Choice Voting in San Francisco Ralph Suter
• [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system Ted Stern
• [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] IRV's adequacy depends on a two-party system Juho Laatu
• [EM] typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Typo Michael Ossipoff
• [EM] MMT repaired. MTAOC simplified. Alternative definition of voting x over y. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] IRV3/AV3 Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] irv3/av3 David L Wetzell
• [EM] Kristofer: Proxy DD MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: Proxy DD Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Ted: Voting system properties MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] State's top-two runoff system under legal fire by political parties Kathy Dopp
• Re: [EM] Condorcet system, or Condorcet efficiency? (was:... wrt Burlington et al.) Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet system, or Condorcet efficiency? (was:... wrt Burlington et al.) Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Small omission in MTAOC program MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval vs IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Approval vs IRV C.Benham
• [EM] Jameson: MMT, MTAOC, MJ MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: MMT, MTAOC, MJ Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set. Clinton Mead
  • Re: [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set. Clinton Mead
  • Re: [EM] Simplest paper count to produce a winner in the smith set. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Approval vs. IRV (hopefully tidier re-send) Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Approval vs. IRV (hopefully tidier re-send) Ted Stern
• [EM] new revised ranked pair method in matrix form Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] new revised ranked pair method in matrix form Ross Hyman
• [EM] Forrest--ABC & FBC passing methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] Kristofer, regarding Proxy DD MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on MMT & MTAOC. Much improved revised MTAOC. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties. Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beat path ties. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties. Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties. Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties. Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties. Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties. Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties. Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] ranked pair method that resolves beath path ties. Markus Schulze
• Re: [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Robert Bristow Johnson wrt Burlington et al. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] ... wrt Burlington et al. robert bristow-johnson
• Re: [EM] Approval vs. IRV Kathy Dopp
  • Re: [EM] Approval vs. IRV Juho Laatu
  • [EM] Approval vs. IRV C.Benham
  • Re: [EM] Approval vs. IRV Juho Laatu
  • [EM] Approval vs. IRV C.Benham
  • Re: [EM] Approval vs. IRV Juho Laatu
  • [EM] Approval vs. IRV C.Benham
  • [EM] Approval vs. IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas Peter Zbornik
  • Re: [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas Peter Zbornik
  • Re: [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] STV and single constraints, like gender quotas Juho Laatu
• [EM] Does High Resolution Range offer a solution to the ABE? fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] Does High Resolution Range offer a solution to the ABE? Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MMPO ideas fsimmons
• Re: [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC. fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] MMPO tiebreakers that don't violate FBC. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Re to Kristof M David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re to Kristof M Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Re to Kristof M David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re to Kristof M Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Re to Kristof M David L Wetzell
• [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Jameson: MTA, MJ, MTAOC, SODA Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Two typos in previous posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Of course MMT fails FBC. MTA-Optional-Conditional. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Of course MMT fails FBC. MTA-Optional-Conditional. Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] Re to KM wrt 3 seat Largest Remainder Hare and Loring Ensemble Rule. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer Musterhjelm Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] Robert Bristow-Johnson David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Robert Bristow-Johnson Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] MMCWPO (minimize maximum cardinal weighted pairwise opposition) satisfies the FBC and solves the ABE problem. fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] MMCWPO (minimize maximum cardinal weighted pairwise opposition) satisfies the FBC and solves the ABE problem. Ted Stern
• Re: [EM] Paradoxes in Proportional Representation. Raph Frank
  • Re: [EM] Paradoxes in Proportional Representation. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• Re: [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Markus: Re: Beatpath as a proposal in the U.S. Juho Laatu
• Re: [EM] TTPD,TR (an FBC complying ABE solution?) fsimmons
• Re: [EM] An ABE solution fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] Re : An ABE solution Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Re : An ABE solution Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Re : An ABE solution Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] An ABE solution Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] Re : An ABE solution Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution fsimmons
  • [EM] Re : An ABE solution Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Re : An ABE solution Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] An ABE solution MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] An ABE solution Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. matt welland
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. matt welland
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Juho Laatu
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] More non-altruistic attacks on IRV usage. robert bristow-johnson
• [EM] Jameson: Regarding preference criteria MIKE OSSIPOFF

• Later messages