election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] MAMD (Max Assent Min Dissent) fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] MAMD (Max Assent Min Dissent) Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Forest: MAMD MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMTA's conditionality doesn't work. Immodest statements about methods' & system's merits. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] MMPO objections fsimmons
• [EM] Ways for MTA & MCA as Approval options. AERLO in MTA or MCA. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ACF grade voting fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] ACF grade voting Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] ACF grade voting C.Benham
• [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections fsimmons
  • [EM] Kristofer: MMPO objections C.Benham
• [EM] Optionalness by candidate. How MTA, MCA & ABucklin can be options in Approval elections. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Getting closer to the DPC while strongly summable. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Use of middle-rating-witholding standards with ABucklin. Optional voting methods are less criticizable. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Thank you! Rémi
• [EM] Jameson: ABE approaches MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Methods based on faction-size or hypothetical cooperation or noncooperation MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Methods based on faction-size or hypothetical cooperation or noncooperation Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Methods based on faction-size or hypothetical cooperation or noncooperation Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Mutual MTA (MMTA). MABucklin2. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Mutual MTA (MMTA). MABucklin2. Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Proportional Range Voting via Honest Approval PAV fsimmons
• [EM] Fwd: SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] Fwd: SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs Jameson Quinn
• [EM] SODA, negotiation, and weak CWs (Jameson Quinn) fsimmons
• [EM] Proportional Range Voting via Honest Approval PAV fsimmons
• [EM] Three suggestions for rank methods and options MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] NP hardness cites for Kemeny Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] NP hardness cites for Kemeny Richard Fobes
  • [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculation times, clarification of NP-hardness issue Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculation times, clarification of NP-hardness issue Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculation times, clarification of NP-hardness issue Andrew Myers
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculation times, clarification of NP-hardness issue Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculation times, clarification of NP-hardness issue Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculation times, clarification of NP-hardness issue Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculation times, clarification of NP-hardness issue Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Approval Strategy fsimmons
  • [EM] Approval strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Approval Strategy fsimmons
  • [EM] Approval Strategy fsimmons
  • [EM] Approval strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A better between-frontrunners approval cutoff. Typo. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Clarification about Threat/Promise strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval strategies MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Three variations of GMAT and MMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better Than Expectation Approval Voting fsimmons
  • [EM] Better Than Expectation Approval Voting (2nd try readable format) fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] Better Than Expectation Approval Voting (2nd try readable format) Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Good references on voting theory Rémi
  • Re: [EM] Good references on voting theory Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Addendum: Above-Mean strategy is Better-Than-Expectation strategy too. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Better-Than-Expectation is the general strategy in Approval and Score-Voting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] FairVote in _Science_ magazine (MIKE OSSIPOFF) fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] FairVote in _Science_ magazine (MIKE OSSIPOFF) Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] FairVote in _Science_ magazine (MIKE OSSIPOFF) fsimmons
• [EM] FairVote in _Science_ magazine MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Richard Fobes
  • [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Fast Condorcet-Kemeny calculations -- in polynomial time Richard Fobes
• [EM] Open-source VoteFair ranking software is now available Richard Fobes
• [EM] Dave: IRV consensus? :-) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg Fred Gohlke
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Re et al Chicken and Egg Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Answer to question about GMAT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Least Expected Umbrage Warren Smith
• Re: [EM] Who wronged the A-plumpers MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Who wronged the A-plumpers C.Benham
• [EM] An opportunity cost-based approach for getting scores from social rankings Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] Least Expected Umbrage, a new lottery method fsimmons
• [EM] Chris: What LNHe is. Your example. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] voters "specifically" wronged by Mono-add-Plump failure C.Benham
• Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 90, Issue 42 David L Wetzell
• [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Chicken or Egg re: Kathy Dopp Dave Ketchum
• Re: [EM] MMT: You're evading my questions. I didn't ask for repetition about generalities. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] how primary forecasts work David L Wetzell
• [EM] You gave the right description of FairVote MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Oops! Errors in GMAT definition. Correct definition. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Greatest-Mutual -Approval-Top (GMAT) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Greatest-Mutual -Approval-Top (GMAT) C.Benham
• Re: [EM] Forest example fsimmons
• [EM] FBC failure for acquiescing coalition methods fsimmons
• [EM] SODA strategy fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] SODA strategy Jameson Quinn
• [EM] I didn't mean to post that message 3 times. I was notified that I'd have to re-send. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Chris: Regarding the criteriion "failures" you mentioned for MMT C.Benham
• [EM] Electoral Experimentation David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Electoral Experimentation Richard Fobes
  • [EM] Electoral Experimentation David L Wetzell
  • Re: [EM] Electoral Experimentation Richard Fobes
• [EM] Simple SODA strategy (post-election delegated phase) Jameson Quinn
• [EM] Chris: The alternative to mutual majority MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Egg or Chicken. David L Wetzell
  • [EM] Electoral experimentation Richard Fobes
  • Re: [EM] Egg or Chicken. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
  • Re: [EM] Egg or Chicken. Kathy Dopp
• [EM] Forest: The example. Jameson: SODA MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Forest: I found an FBC failure for Minimal Aquiescing Majorities-Top MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] San Francisco considers getting rid of IRV Kathy Dopp
• [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for. Andy Jennings
  • Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for. Andrew Myers
  • Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for. Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] SODA might be the method we've been looking for. fsimmons
• [EM] suggested improvement on Mutual Majority criterion/set C.Benham
  • [EM] suggested improvement on Mutual Majority criterion/set C.Benham
• Re: [EM] Mike: variations on Kevin's ABE and LRV fsimmons
• [EM] Forest: MAMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Forest: MAMT C.Benham
  • Re: [EM] Forest: MAMT fsimmons
  • [EM] Forest: MAMT C.Benham
• [EM] Dave: Re: The Occupy-Movement MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Two failed postings, and then one complete one MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: MMT's strategy incentives MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: MMP's strategy incentives MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Chris: MMP's strategy incentives MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Mike Ossipoff: LRV properties fsimmons
• [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics Michael Allan
  • Re: [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- in Politics Leon Smith
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics James Gilmour
  • [EM] The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [CES #4194] Re: The Occupy Movement: A Ray of Hope -- inPolitics Leon Smith
• [EM] What are the entries for LRV in my FBC/ABE methods properties table? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] (no subject) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] (no subject) Michael Ossipoff
  • Re: [EM] (no subject) Dave Ketchum
• [EM] MAM evaluation. Summary of FBC/ABE methods. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] MAM evaluation. Summary of FBC/ABE methods. fsimmons
• [EM] Least Resentment Voting (LRV) in the context of Approval fsimmons
• Re: [EM] Acquiescing majority MMT (MIKE OSSIPOFF) fsimmons
• Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs Andrew Myers
• [EM] Acquiescing majority MMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Reply to a posting from Chris on November 17th, re: MDDTR MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Oops! Forgot to include Chris's text. Chris MMT reply, complete this time. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Oops! Forgot to include Chris's text. Chris MMT reply, complete this time. C.Benham
• [EM] Chris: Criterion compliances of MMT2 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs Ross Hyman
  • Re: [EM] finding the beat path winner with just one pass through the ranked pairs Ross Hyman
• [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion Jameson Quinn
  • Re: [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion fsimmons
  • Re: [EM] MMPO and Symmetric Completion Jameson Quinn
• Re: [EM] MMT fsimmons
• [EM] MMT2 meets FBC, fails Mono-Add-Plump, as it should. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] MMT2 meets FBC, fails Mono-Add-Plump, as it should. C.Benham
• [EM] Dave Ketchum: IRV strategy MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum: IRV strategy Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances. Jameson Quinn
  • [EM] Chris: MMT criterion compliances. C.Benham
• [EM] That was MMT1. MMT2 is like MTAOC. Replacing the word "any" in the definitions. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Forest's FBC/ABC method fsimmons
• [EM] Complete MMT definition MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Complete MMT definition C.Benham
• [EM] Oops! Chris is right. Yet another try at a definition. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Chris: MMT MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How to vote in IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] How to vote in IRV Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] How to vote in IRV C.Benham
  • [EM] How to vote in IRV MIKE OSSIPOFF

• Earlier messages
• Later messages