On Mar 20, 1:52 am, "Stephen P. King" <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
> might say that the "standard" of Integers is their "truth", but that > itself is a measure requiring a standard of its own and, again, a means > to compare the standard with the numbers. What is the "means of > comparison"? Hi Stephen, I think that the means of comparison is sense. Not mere functional detection but subjective experience which relates local detections to the entirety of experiential possibilities. Sense is not just adding experiences in a subjective vacuum which somehow 'make sense' to a subject with no history, it can only make sense if it emerges out of a context which makes sense already. We are a 'chip off the old (timeless actually) block', and as such, we tend to recognize the old block - especially the part we chipped off of. Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.