On 3/24/2012 12:37 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> You keep asking who is this "you"
> it is the usual you, as the one you use in your everyday
The word "you" works fine in the usual everyday world,
No, please answer the last part of the message. The everyday world if MWI is true, is a
Yes, and I think Bruno's argument is to show that if consciousness is a kind of
computation then diverging computations would produce the same kind of uncertainty that QM
does in the MW interpretation. However, that doesn't /solve/ the problem it just makes
two problems the same. In Everett's MWI there is a problem saying what probabilities
mean, which is just the same as the one in the transporter thought experiment(c.f.
arXiv:0905.0624v1 by Ardian Kent).
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at