On Apr 3, 5:27 am, 1Z <peterdjo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > But the experiment didn't show there was more or less free will. It
> > > didn't even show
> > > there was any free will. It just showed that inducing a belief in free
> > > will changed
> > > performance.
> > Performance in what though? Readiness to execute personal will.
> Nothing in the experiment indicates the will was free in a
> sense, just the usual scientific sense of volition, ie conscious
> or control by higher brain centres.
Right. I don't even look at the philosophy of how free is free - any
experience of will is unexplainable in a deterministic universe.
> > >It might have also shown that belief in alien abductions changed
> > > performance.
> > No, they did controls to eliminate that. There may be other beliefs
> > that change people's ability to take action as well, but this study
> > suggests that this specific idea that we should doubt the existence of
> > our own free will has a negative impact on the very thing that is
> > being considered.
> > > Either one is perfectly consistent with determinism.
> > No, determinism would not allow a mention of a deterministic function
> > of the brain to affect the performance of that function, because then
> > it wouldn't be deterministic - it would be open to suggestion by
> > others and by ourselves.
> One deterministic process can affect another. Think of dropping a
> of a tall building.
That's a straw man of the findings. What the experiment shows would be
like dropping a clock off of a tall building and seeing that it falls
faster than 32ft/sec/sec if you tell it that it's doomed to fall,
slower than 32ft/sec/sec if you tell it that it can control the speed
of its fall, and exactly 32ft/sec/sec if you tell it unrelated things.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at