2013/2/8 Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com>

>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 2013/2/8 Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/2/8 Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:12 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 2/7/2013 3:52 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:04 PM, John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Telmo Menezes <
>>>>>>> te...@telmomenezes.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        >>> I'm not claiming that intelligence == mind.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > Do you believe that your fellow human beings have minds? If so
>>>>>>>>> why?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   > Yes (weakly).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You believe that only weakly?! Do you really think there is a 49%
>>>>>>> chance that you are the only conscious being in the universe?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I don't know how to assign a probability to that. I guess I believe
>>>>>> it's in ]0.5, 1] because I would bet on it, but that's all I can say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I say weakly because the only thing I have to back this belief is
>>>>>> an heuristic, which I find to be a weaker form of approximating the truth
>>>>>> than mathematical proof or experimental confirmation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  By the way, I don't believe other people have minds when they are
>>>>>>> sleeping or under anesthesia or dead because when they are in those 
>>>>>>> states
>>>>>>> they don't behave very intelligently.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  But that is because you believe that intelligence == mind. I don't.
>>>>>> Certain experiences that you can do on yourself might make you doubt that
>>>>>> belief, but I don't know of any way to convince you except suggesting 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> you do those experiences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    > Occam's razor. If I'm the only human being with a mind, then,
>>>>>>>> for some mysterious reason, there are two types of human beings: me 
>>>>>>>> (with a
>>>>>>>> mind) and the others (zombies). So heuristically I'm inclined to 
>>>>>>>> believe
>>>>>>>> that all human beings have a mind,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, but if you also believe in Darwin's theory of Evolution then you
>>>>>>> must also believe that consciousness MUST be a byproduct of intelligence
>>>>>>> because Evolution can't directly see consciousness any better than we 
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>> and so cannot select for it, and yet you and probably other people are
>>>>>>> conscious. Thus you must also believe that if a computer is intelligent
>>>>>>> then it is conscious. Then you must also believe that intelligence == 
>>>>>>> mind.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  You are begging the question. You're assuming, to begin with, that
>>>>>> intelligence == mind and then you claim to prove that intelligence == 
>>>>>> mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  By the way, for evolution to generate consciousness there has to
>>>>>> exist a gradient to climb. Unless the evolutionary process just stumbles
>>>>>> into consciousness, but in that case it is not a valid theory of it's
>>>>>> origin. So you are implicitly assuming that there is some measure of
>>>>>> consciousness, where you can say that entity A is more conscious than
>>>>>> entity B. What would that even mean? My cat seems conscious to me (but I
>>>>>> can't know for sure). Is he less conscious than me? Well I know stuff 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> he doesn't, but he also knows stuff that I don't -- for example he knows
>>>>>> how it feels to be a cat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But that doesn't mean there's something magic about being a cat.  I
>>>>>> think it might be possible to change your brain, and your sensory organs,
>>>>>> so that it implemented consciousness very similar to a cat's (it couldn't
>>>>>> be exact because you'd need a cat's body for that).  Of course it 
>>>>>> wouldn't
>>>>>> be Telmo Menezes any more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree that this might be possible. But the paradox then is the
>>>>> following: to make me feel like a cat you have to strip me of my memories
>>>>> (read/write access), so when I'm back from the experience I won't remember
>>>>> it. In fact I turned into a cat for a while and then back to Telmo 
>>>>> Menezes.
>>>>> Telmo Menezes still knows nothing about being a cat.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, while going from Telmo to the cat, you're rigth that Telmo
>>>> memories should be erased, the inverse is not true. Why couldn't you be
>>>> back as Telmo + the memories of having been a cat ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Quentin,
>>>
>>> Because that would require that I had write-only access to my human
>>> memories while being a cat. I don't think that's possible.
>>>
>>
>> Why not ?? You put forward a technical problem on a thought experiment
>> which have if you go that way a bigger technical problem in the first
>> place... so your objection is totally irrelevant, we are in a thought
>> experiment, in that setting, if we can conceive transferring consciousnes
>> of the cat, then there is no reason we can't imagine you remember being a
>> cat after the experiment. I'll agree to talk technical problems the day we
>> would have the first insight of how to really do it... before, it is just
>> premature to use technical arguments.
>>
>
> Fair enough, maybe it's my CS bias. But I'm still not convinced this is a
> purely technical issue. Can you conceive of any system that stores
> information in some coherent way that you can write to without reading?
>

Well, yes... with computer you could imagine doing just that... so why not
? Also, the fact that you can't imagine a solution yourself, doesn't mean
there isn't one, lack of imagination is also not an argument.

Regards,
Quentin


>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Quentin
>>
>>
>>>  For example, to store the memories on how a cat feels about climbing a
>>> tree, I would have to access my human representation of a tree to connect
>>> the memories to it, but accessing my human representation of a tree would
>>> spoil my cat experience.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Quentin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yes I think there are degrees and kinds of consciousness and that
>>>>>> a cat's consciousness differs in both respects.  There's consciousness of
>>>>>> being an individual and of being located in 3-space and in time.  You and
>>>>>> the cat have both of those (whereas a Mars rover only has the latter).  
>>>>>> But
>>>>>> there's language and narrative memory that you have and the cat doesn't.
>>>>>> There's reflective thought,"I'm Telmo and I'm thinking about myself and
>>>>>> where I fit in the world".  The cat probably doesn't have this because 
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> not social - but a dog might.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But is this really a case of "degrees of consciousness" or is it just
>>>>> the general property of "being conscious" instantiated in different
>>>>> contexts? The fact that you believe you can turn me into a cat seems to
>>>>> indicate that ultimately you believe that consciousness is all the same.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brent
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> Visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> Visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>>>> Visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to