github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support binary and string types for concat UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support binary and string types for concat UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] panic: nth_value window function negates i64::MIN [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(aqe): add `plan_id` to dynamic join [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor(aqe): add `plan_id` to dynamic join [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Port `TryCastExpr` to use `try_to_proto` / `try_from_proto` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor: Port TryCastExpr proto serialization hooks [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] DataFusion evaluates -0.0 >= 0.0 as false [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DataFusion evaluates -0.0 >= 0.0 as false [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: codegen dispatcher returns NULL for invalid try_make_timestamp inputs (#4554) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: codegen dispatcher returns NULL for invalid try_make_timestamp inputs (#4554) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] support size() for MapType inputs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: unify ordering display with optimization path [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: unify ordering display with optimization path [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Skip zero-fill of hash buffer by writing null sentinels [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip zero-fill of hash buffer by writing null sentinels [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] sqllogictest fails with default feature set [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: Make sqllogictest pass with default features [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Make sqllogictest pass with default features [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] bug: Describe fails when schema has FixedBinarySize columns [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bug: Describe fails when schema has FixedBinarySize columns [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add `fill_null` on dataframe/expr level [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Correct computation of multi-key join selectivity [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Correct computation of selectivity for multi-key joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `estimate_inner_join_cardinality` is incorrect for multi-key joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `estimate_inner_join_cardinality` is incorrect for multi-key joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `estimate_inner_join_cardinality` is incorrect for multi-key joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill path: untracked allocation overshoots memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: add Boston DataFusion meetup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add Boston DataFusion meetup [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add Boston DataFusion meetup [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Lower SLT HEADROOM_FACTOR 8.0 -> 5.0 to surface nested_loop_join_spill leak [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lower SLT HEADROOM_FACTOR 8.0 -> 5.0 to surface nested_loop_join_spill leak [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lower SLT HEADROOM_FACTOR 8.0 -> 5.0 to surface nested_loop_join_spill leak [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lower SLT HEADROOM_FACTOR 8.0 -> 5.0 to surface nested_loop_join_spill leak [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fix issues found when documenting current expression incompatibilities [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix issues found when documenting current expression incompatibilities [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: drop misleading ANSI-mode incompatibility note from CometSum [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Deep AND/OR predicate chains overflow protobuf recursion limit when the serialized plan is re-parsed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Rebalance deep associative binary expression chains (Add, Multiply, bitwise) to avoid protobuf recursion limit [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] collection expression audit follow-ups (from #4473) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Investigate adopting DataFusion's allocator-level memory accounting to replace manual memory tuning [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] CometFromUnixTime reports unsupported format patterns as Incompatible instead of Unsupported [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Automated test validation of MemoryTracker accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Bug] replace returns wrong result for empty-string search [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: fix conflicting status legend and inconsistent issue links in expressions.md [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix conflicting status legend and inconsistent issue links in expressions.md [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix conflicting status legend and inconsistent issue links in expressions.md [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor: introduce CometPlanner to replace CometScanRule and CometExecRule [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: introduce CometPlanner to replace CometScanRule and CometExecRule [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support lower and upper scalar udf on dict arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] String expression (collation) audit followup [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: replace default-allow cast unwrap with closed-by-default allowlist (timestamp + integer widening) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: replace default-allow cast unwrap with closed-by-default allowlist (timestamp + integer widening) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: replace default-allow cast unwrap with closed-by-default allowlist (timestamp + integer widening) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: replace default-allow cast unwrap with closed-by-default allowlist (timestamp + integer widening) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Rust SQL parser benchmarks, second edition [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rust SQL parser benchmarks, second edition [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Benchmark Results: Rust SQL Parser Comparison [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: replace CometBatchIterator FFI input path with the Arrow C Stream Interface [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support Spark expression json_array_length [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Spark expression json_array_length [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Spark expression json_array_length [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Spark expression json_array_length [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Spark expression json_array_length [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Spark expression json_array_length [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(substrait): generate Substrait function YAML [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(substrait): generate Substrait function YAML [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark Expression Encode [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark Expression Encode [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark Expression Encode [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark Expression Encode [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark Expression Encode [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: enable CometLocalTableScanExec by default [datafusion-comet] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages