github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] [branch-54] Update changelog after backports [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-54] Update changelog after backports [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Support nested array with struct elements in `sort_array` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support nested array with struct elements in `sort_array` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support nested array with struct elements in `sort_array` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support nested array with struct elements in `sort_array` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: stop prettier table re-alignment churn in expressions.md [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: stop prettier table re-alignment churn in expressions.md [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: stop prettier table re-alignment churn in expressions.md [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add support for Spark-compatible `explode_outer` function for arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix volatile scalar subquery deduplication [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: prototype allocator-level OOM circuit breaker (OomGuard) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: prototype allocator-level OOM circuit breaker (OomGuard) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: prototype allocator-level OOM circuit breaker (OomGuard) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: ln() of negative or zero should error to match PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ln() of negative or zero should error to match PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ln() of negative or zero should error to match PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ln() of negative or zero should error to match PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ln() of negative or zero should error to match PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(spark): next_day should not trim whitespace from dayOfWeek [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): next_day should not trim whitespace from dayOfWeek [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): next_day should not trim whitespace from dayOfWeek [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): next_day should not trim whitespace from dayOfWeek [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): next_day should not trim whitespace from dayOfWeek [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(spark): next_day should not trim whitespace from dayOfWeek [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(logical-plan): box CreateExternalTable / CreateFunction in DdlStatement (-45% LogicalPlan size) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] perf: LogicalPlan enum is 320 bytes due to oversized DdlStatement variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] perf: LogicalPlan enum is 320 bytes due to oversized DdlStatement variants [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(physical-expr): port TryCastExpr to try_to_proto / try_from_proto hooks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(physical-expr): port TryCastExpr to try_to_proto / try_from_proto hooks [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Comet collaboration blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Bug] array_distinct / array_union / array_except do not canonicalize NaN like Spark [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Bug] array_distinct / array_union / array_except do not canonicalize NaN like Spark [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Bug] array_distinct / array_union / array_except do not canonicalize NaN like Spark [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feature: add regexp_extract [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feature: add regexp_extract [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: add fast syntactic-only scalafix gate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add fast syntactic-only scalafix gate [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: early termination for right semi/anti hash joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: early termination for right semi/anti hash joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(ci): Try to use more MacOS Github hosted runners [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): Use MacOS Github hosted runners for the small CI checks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve error message on cast structs to have non-nullable inner-fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message on cast structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message on invalid casts for structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message on invalid casts for structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message on invalid casts for structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message on invalid casts for structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message on invalid casts for structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve error message on invalid casts for structs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Deduplicate uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Intermediate result blocked approach to aggregation memory management [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Intermediate result blocked approach to aggregation memory management [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Intermediate result blocked approach to aggregation memory management [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Intermediate result blocked approach to aggregation memory management [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Intermediate result blocked approach to aggregation memory management [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: Split hash aggregation logic into separated streams [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support binary and string types for concat UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support binary and string types for concat UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input (#4472) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support size() for MapType input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve async UDF return field metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Make Eq with negative float zero compat with other engines [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] panic: nth_value window function negates i64::MIN [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(aqe): add `plan_id` to dynamic join [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor(aqe): add `plan_id` to dynamic join [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(tui): Show shimmer animation for "Queued" and "Running" jobs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Port `TryCastExpr` to use `try_to_proto` / `try_from_proto` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor: Port TryCastExpr proto serialization hooks [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid extraneous casts for equivalent nested types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(optimizer): generic in-place mutable rewrite to obsolete per-rule fast-paths [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] DataFusion evaluates -0.0 >= 0.0 as false [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DataFusion evaluates -0.0 >= 0.0 as false [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: codegen dispatcher returns NULL for invalid try_make_timestamp inputs (#4554) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: codegen dispatcher returns NULL for invalid try_make_timestamp inputs (#4554) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] support size() for MapType inputs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array_size returns -1 instead of null for null input [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regex simplification of anchored patterns produces wrong results [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: unify ordering display with optimization path [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: unify ordering display with optimization path [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages