kplug-lpsg  

Messages by Date

• 2007/10/31 Re: decenturl.com Barry Gershenfeld
• 2007/10/31 Re: decenturl.com John H. Robinson, IV
• 2007/10/31 decenturl.com Ben Hoyt
• 2007/10/31 Re: decenturl.com Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/10/31 Re: decenturl.com Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com John H. Robinson, IV
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com John H. Robinson, IV
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Brad Beyenhof
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Brad Beyenhof
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com John H. Robinson, IV
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com Bob La Quey
• 2007/10/30 Re: decenturl.com John H. Robinson, IV
• 2007/10/30 decenturl.com Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/10/29 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christoph Maier
• 2007/10/29 Re: meeting: Thursday, Nov 1 -- unicode anyone? Gus Wirth
• 2007/10/29 Re: meeting: Thursday, Nov 1 -- unicode anyone? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/29 Re: meeting: Thursday, Nov 1 -- unicode anyone? Gus Wirth
• 2007/10/29 Re: MTV meets SICP James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/29 Re: MTV meets SICP Mark Schoonover
• 2007/10/29 Re: MTV meets SICP Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/29 Re: MTV meets SICP Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/29 Re: MTV meets SICP James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/29 MTV meets SICP Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/28 Re: meeting: Thursday, Nov 1 -- unicode anyone? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/28 Re: meeting: Thursday, Nov 1 -- unicode anyone? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/28 Re: need opinions: where to put unit tests? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/28 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/28 Re: meeting: Thursday, Nov 1 -- unicode anyone? Gus Wirth
• 2007/10/28 meeting: Thursday, Nov 1 -- unicode anyone? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/27 need opinions: where to put unit tests? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/27 RE: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christoph Maier
• 2007/10/27 Re: Artificial Intelligence Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/10/27 Re: Artificial Intelligence Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/10/27 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/27 Re: Okay ... I was wrong ... C++ sucks--just use C Lan Barnes
• 2007/10/27 Okay ... I was wrong ... C++ sucks--just use C Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/27 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/27 Re: Artificial Intelligence Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/27 Re: Artificial Intelligence Lan Barnes
• 2007/10/27 Re: Artificial Intelligence Darren New
• 2007/10/27 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Darren New
• 2007/10/27 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/10/27 Artificial Intelligence Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/10/27 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/27 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/10/27 RE: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gabriel Sechan
• 2007/10/27 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/27 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Darren New
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Darren New
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Darren New
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Bob La Quey
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Bob La Quey
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Bob La Quey
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? David M. Cook
• 2007/10/26 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Bob La Quey
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Darren New
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/25 RE: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gabriel Sechan
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/25 RE: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gabriel Sechan
• 2007/10/25 RE: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gabriel Sechan
• 2007/10/25 RE: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gabriel Sechan
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gus Wirth
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Darren New
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Darren New
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Darren New
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gus Wirth
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/25 Re: More volunteers needed SCFN James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/25 RE: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gabriel Sechan
• 2007/10/25 Re: More volunteers needed SCFN Randall Shimizu
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/25 RE: MS to legitimize functional programming? Gabriel Sechan
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Christopher Smith
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Lan Barnes
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/10/25 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Lan Barnes
• 2007/10/24 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/24 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/24 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/24 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/24 Re: MS to legitimize functional programming? Chris Grau
• 2007/10/23 MS to legitimize functional programming? Tracy R Reed
• 2007/10/17 Re: unicode info program James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/17 unicode info program James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/14 Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials) Ralph Shumaker
• 2007/10/06 Re: automotive locksmithing database brainstorming (was kee database) James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/05 Re: kee database (was Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials)) Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/05 Re: kee database (was Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials)) James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/05 Re: kee database (was Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials)) Stewart Stremler
• 2007/10/04 Re: kee database (was Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials)) Ralph Shumaker
• 2007/10/02 kee database (was Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials)) James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/02 Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials) Ralph Shumaker
• 2007/10/02 Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials) Barry Gershenfeld
• 2007/10/02 Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials) Barry Gershenfeld
• 2007/10/01 Re: Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials) James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/10/01 Base tutorials (sparked by request for Perl tutorials) Ralph Shumaker
• 2007/10/01 October 4 LPSG meeting moved to qualcom George Geller
• 2007/09/27 Re: Why does configure check for Fortran? Christopher Smith
• 2007/09/26 Re: Why does configure check for Fortran? Stewart Stremler
• 2007/09/26 Re: Why does configure check for Fortran? Paul G. Allen
• 2007/09/26 Why does configure check for Fortran? Gus Wirth
• 2007/09/26 Special Oct 4 Meeting - different location George Geller
• 2007/09/24 Re: October Meeting Chris Grau
• 2007/09/23 Re: October Meeting James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/09/23 Re: October Meeting George Geller
• 2007/09/21 Re: October Meeting James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/09/20 October Meeting George Geller
• 2007/09/18 Re: scalability and java Christopher Smith
• 2007/09/18 Re: scalability and java Nikolaj Baer
• 2007/09/18 Re: scalability and java Christopher Smith
• 2007/09/17 Re: scalability and java Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/09/17 Re: scalability and java Andrew Lentvorski
• 2007/09/17 RE: scalability and java Gabriel Sechan
• 2007/09/17 scalability and java Nikolaj Baer
• 2007/09/14 Re: Real path vs. link James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/09/14 Re: Real path vs. link Darren New
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link John H. Robinson, IV
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link Carl Lowenstein
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link Rick Funderburg
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link John H. Robinson, IV
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link Stewart Stremler
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link Stewart Stremler
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/09/12 Re: Real path vs. link Christopher Smith
• 2007/09/12 Real path vs. link Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo Carl Lowenstein
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo Carl Lowenstein
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo Carl Lowenstein
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo Carl Lowenstein
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo Barry Gershenfeld
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo James G. Sack (jim)
• 2007/08/31 Re: Logo David M. Cook
• 2007/08/31 Logo Tracy R Reed
• 2007/08/28 Re: GreaseMonkey Barry Gershenfeld
• 2007/08/28 Re: GreaseMonkey Mark Schoonover
• 2007/08/28 Re: GreaseMonkey Stewart Stremler

• Earlier messages
• Later messages