I am using
portsnap fetch
portsnap update
to sync my ports tree on FreeBSd 6.1...it seems it maintains an index
when I run update.
I am used to using:
portsversion and portsupdate to upgrade ports...in this method I have
also used
portsdb -Uu
to rebuild an index anytime prior to running th
I have had this problem for a month now...have tried several things
and still no luck...I really need some advice please!!!
Here is the situation:
1 - freebsd 6.1-RELEASE-p6 running sshd in standard config. my
server is server1.domain.com. hosts.allow has not been touched nor
has just abo
El día Friday, September 15, 2006 a las 01:23:32PM +0800, David Schulz escribió:
...
>
> So using this command : egrep -v -e "\---|^$|Date" -D read /dev/
> cuad0 , works, and puts out the data to stdout for me to see, but
> when i want to pipe it to a file, using egrep -v -e "\---|^$
Hello,
Data coming from /dev/cuad0 looks like this when read using cat /dev/
cuad0 :
->Snippet start
09/15/06 11:17AM 8003 13 17909013923793510 00:10'58
Date TimeExt CODial NumberRing Duration
Acc code CD
--
>>
>> > I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
>> > another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
>> > installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and
>> hostname
>> > to this machine for both the FreeBSD and RHEL installations.
>> >
>> >
At Thu, 14 Sep 2006 it looks like White Hat composed:
> --- michael johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, assuming I remove Firefox and install
> linux-firefox, which what version of flash in the
> ports tree am I suppose to install to make it all
> work?
>
Yes, I just went to test my ban
Hello everyone. After a bit of a wrestle, I installed my first FreeBSD
6.1 server on a PIII 733MHz with 512 Megs of RAM on a 6.5 Gig slice
(a:/, b:swap, d:/var, e:/tmp, f:/usr). I got X Windows working after a
little bit more struggle - I now have Afterstep, WindowMaker and fvwm
working for me.
T
> I'm beginning the install of 6.1 RELEASE on a Dell 1950. It uses
> Dual Embedded Broadcom NetXtreme II 5708 Gigabit Ethernet NICs,
> and they are not correctly recognized during the install. The
> system identifies them as bce0 and bce1, but apparently the driver
> isn't working right.
>
> Does
--On September 15, 2006 12:55:49 PM +0900 Garrett Cooper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those particular cards should use a generic driver (in this case bc).
The fact that your interfaces are found though seems to point to the
fact that things are not configured properly, network-wise. Are you
sure
On Sep 15, 2006, at 12:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning the install of 6.1 RELEASE on a Dell 1950. It uses
Dual Embedded Broadcom NetXtreme II 5708 Gigabit Ethernet NICs, and
they are not correctly recognized during the install. The system
identifies them as bce0 and bce1, bu
I'm beginning the install of 6.1 RELEASE on a Dell 1950. It uses Dual
Embedded Broadcom NetXtreme II 5708 Gigabit Ethernet NICs, and they are
not correctly recognized during the install. The system identifies them
as bce0 and bce1, but apparently the driver isn't working right.
Does anyone h
On Sep 15, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Peter wrote:
Yes, the Flash issue is a real bummer. It is best *not* to show your
friends that when you introduce them to FBSD.
Why? Is there some reason that you or they want to watch ads?
I can't think of a sin
> >> > # ll /dev/ad0s7
> >> > crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
> >> > # file -s /dev/ad0s7
> >> > /dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
> >> > # grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
> >> > /dev/ad0s7 /linux ext2fs ro 0 0
> >> > # ll -d /l
Olivier Nicole wrote:
> I know the mistake was on my side, I was not carefull enough when
> using portupgrade on a production machine but...
>
> Yesterday I froze our system for about one hour when I used
> portupgrade to upgrade Samba. It was a very minor upgrade (from 3.0.10
> to 3.0.23c,1 I th
Hi,
I know the mistake was on my side, I was not carefull enough when
using portupgrade on a production machine but...
Yesterday I froze our system for about one hour when I used
portupgrade to upgrade Samba. It was a very minor upgrade (from 3.0.10
to 3.0.23c,1 I think), but it happens that in b
> | Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
> | with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
> | It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
> | antivirus + postgrey
> | and some small auxiliary services.
> Your server is good enough to
> Just out of curiosity I tried ruby port on two machines - fast one
> (1.6GHz Athlon with 1GB RAM) and small one (400MHz with 96MB RAM).
> Fast one has no problems with ruby, it builds and installs in few
> minutes. The slow one is another story, however.
There is definitely something in teh buil
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:56:30PM -0400, michael johnson wrote:
> On 9/14/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >--- White Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> FreeBSD 6.1
> >>
> >> I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
> >> FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Peter wrote:
>> Yes, the Flash issue is a real bummer. It is best *not* to show your
>> friends that when you introduce them to FBSD.
>
> Why? Is there some reason that you or they want to watch ads?
>
> I can't think of a single site that I us
On 9/14/06, White Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- michael johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, assuming I remove Firefox and install
linux-firefox, which what version of flash in the
ports tree am I suppose to install to make it all
work?
Don't deinstall firefox. just install linux-fire
--- michael johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, assuming I remove Firefox and install
linux-firefox, which what version of flash in the
ports tree am I suppose to install to make it all
work?
--
White Hat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
On 9/14/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- White Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreeBSD 6.1
>
> I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
> FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of the
> major problems is the inability to get flash to work
> properly to display videos
On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Peter wrote:
Yes, the Flash issue is a real bummer. It is best *not* to show your
friends that when you introduce them to FBSD.
Why? Is there some reason that you or they want to watch ads?
I can't think of a single site that I use that needs Flash; I don't
ins
--- White Hat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreeBSD 6.1
>
> I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
> FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of the
> major problems is the inability to get flash to work
> properly to display videos available on Google. I know
> that the linux-fl
FreeBSD 6.1
I have been trying to get a few of my friends to try
FBSD on their PCs without much success. One of the
major problems is the inability to get flash to work
properly to display videos available on Google. I know
that the linux-flash port is marked broken, so that it
out. How else can I
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> > > # ll /dev/ad0s7
> > > crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
> > > # file -s /dev/ad0s7
> > > /dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
> > > # grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
> > > /dev/ad0s7 /linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Perry Hutchison) writes:
>> > # ll /dev/ad0s7
>> > crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
>> > # file -s /dev/ad0s7
>> > /dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
>> > # grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
>> > /dev/ad0s7 /linux ext2fs ro
> > # ll /dev/ad0s7
> > crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
> > # file -s /dev/ad0s7
> > /dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
> > # grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
> > /dev/ad0s7 /linux ext2fs ro 0 0
> > # ll -d /linux
> > drwxr-xr-x
I am at my wits end with this... help please!
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
Sendmail 8.13.6 (base)
I'm trying to accomplish what should be simple:
1) all outgoing From: email addresses should be stamped @ourdomain.com and
not @server.corpdomain.com
2) All emails should be routed through the corp SMTP ser
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
Olivier Nicole wrote:
Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
6 day
Is it possible to tell syslog to log everything *except* some facility?
I have a very noisy service (openldap) that I don't want to log into
my all.log; but I still want all.log to catch everything else.
Something like this maybe?
*.*,!local4.* all.log
*.*,local4.none all.log
__
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Panagiotis wrote:
Chris wrote:
...system, we could come back up I think and try ride out the
attack. I've never done this before but in an earlier thread I
saw where you configure a pipe such as:
ipfw pipe 1 config bw 256Kbit/s
ipfw add pipe 1 tcp from 192.
Chris wrote:
This is probably going to tax the memory. I'm sorry in advance.
We observed 2 hangs and 3 crashes in the last 5 hours and finally
after looking at the nature of the traffic, it appears to be little
infested windows spybots from all over targeting our forums to
attempt to repl
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 07:29:13PM +, Marwan Sultan wrote:
> hello Lowell,
>
> thank you for your reply, i wish you could find some solution for me
> i tried to google the net, and found many results for atapci1: failed to
> enable memory mapping!
> but most with no solutions.
I doubt
hello Lowell,
thank you for your reply, i wish you could find some solution for me
i tried to google the net, and found many results for atapci1: failed to
enable memory mapping!
but most with no solutions.
here is the dmesg,
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c
On Thursday 14 September 2006 13:29, Andy Greenwood wrote:
> What about making it a sysinstall option? Not in the base install, but
> the option is presented when setting up a new box.
>
> On 9/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0400, Gerard Sei
Hello all,
I'm using freebsd 6.1 as a bridge (if_bridge)
The interfaces are vr0 (plugged into the DSL modem)
and rl0 (plugged into the switch, to the rest of the network
On the bridge, I'm attempting to use pf to "rdr" all http requests from
my lan, to squid (actually dansguardian)
I have squ
Bill Moran wrote:
>
> Has anyone every verified whether or not SATA has the problems that plagued
> ATA? Such as crappy quality and lying caches?
>
> Personally, I still demand SCSI on production servers because it still
> seems as if:
> a) The performance is still better
> b) The reliability is s
On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:01 pm, Dan Nelson wrote:
> You can try top in I/O mode. Run top, hit "m", then enter "ototal".
That was exactly it. Thanks!
--
Kirk Strauser
pgpv29LbwLcuV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
RJ45 wrote on Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:24:43AM -0600:
>
>
> Hello,
> I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
>
> THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
> seen by the system.
>
> At boot thime I Get this warning
>
> 524288Kb of memory above 4GB
RJ45 wrote on Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:47:28AM -0600:
>
>
> Hello I wanted to buildworld and kernel on FReeBSD 6.1 since I have Xeon
> cpu, I Wanted to rebuild it with CPUTYPE=nocona
>
> when I put the oprion in /etc/make.conf upon compilation instead of
> -march=nocona is used -march=prescott
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Fred C! wrote:
As I told you in my previews emails all the python tests went with
no errors.
Yes. This probably means the problem is not with the basic Python
installation and may not be specific to FreeBSD. In other words, you
might obtain better results as
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:29:38PM -0400, Andy Greenwood wrote:
> What about making it a sysinstall option? Not in the base install, but
> the option is presented when setting up a new box.
That's not ruled out, if someone does the work.
Kris
pgpIrJBp4JQSq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Is it possible to tell syslog to log everything *except* some facility?
I have a very noisy service (openldap) that I don't want to log into
my all.log; but I still want all.log to catch everything else.
Something like this maybe?
*.*,!local4.* all.log
--
--
Perfection is just a word I use
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:56:24AM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:45:49 -0500 Greg Groth
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Are any of the major server brands more FreeBSD friendly than others? I'm
> >looking to purchase a server for some web apps. Our current
What about making it a sysinstall option? Not in the base install, but
the option is presented when setting up a new box.
On 9/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:09, Kris Kennaway wrot
On Sep 13, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Fred C! wrote:
Hello I have a problem with Python + sqlite3. My main machine is a
FreeBSD 6.1 I have also try on an old machine running FreeBSD 5.5
and it doesn't work either. I join to this email some information
Yes, I'm su'ed on both machines:
uid=0(root) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel), 5(operator)
-Mike
On 9/14/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In response to "Michael Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm being driven slowly mad by cvs...
>
> I have 3 boxes, one is acting as a cvs server. The "c
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > One should not conclude anything until the numbers are much larger
> > than they are now, because small fluctuations from e.g. regional
> > promotion of bsdstats in one
In response to "Michael Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm being driven slowly mad by cvs...
>
> I have 3 boxes, one is acting as a cvs server. The "cvs clients" (for
> lack of a better term) are running 6.1 and should be configured the
> same. Yet, one machine lets me do a cvs login, the other
I'm being driven slowly mad by cvs...
I have 3 boxes, one is acting as a cvs server. The "cvs clients" (for
lack of a better term) are running 6.1 and should be configured the
same. Yet, one machine lets me do a cvs login, the other requires I
use cvs -d :psserver:.. with each cvs command.
I d
In the last episode (Sep 14), Kirk Strauser said:
> Some process on my system is really slamming my gstripe volume (so says
> systat -iostat and gstat). Is there a relatively easy way to see which
> processes are responsible?
You can try top in I/O mode. Run top, hit "m", then enter "ototal".
--On Thursday, September 14, 2006 11:45:49 -0500 Greg Groth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are any of the major server brands more FreeBSD friendly than others? I'm
looking to purchase a server for some web apps. Our current config is
running on a 6 year old Dell PowerEdge machine with SCSI RAID 5,
On Thursday 14 September 2006 12:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> One should not conclude anything until the numbers are much larger
> than they are now, because small fluctuations from e.g. regional
> promotion of bsdstats in one country but not another, or one large
> company deploying it on all machi
On 9/14/2006 10:32 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmai
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Derek Ragona wrote:
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS,
but SAS costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
Get a 12 or 16 or 24 port Areca card and have a few hot spares and
you will see SATA fly for less money than SC
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS, but SAS
costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
-Derek
At 10:46 AM 9/14/2006, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > Frank Bonnet wrote:
> >
> > [..
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
I have yet to have a SATA drive last
--- Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In response to Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > > Frank Bonnet wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >> I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around
> 10K$
> > >
> > > Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason
> that SA
Some process on my system is really slamming my gstripe volume (so says
systat -iostat and gstat). Is there a relatively easy way to see which
processes are responsible?
--
Kirk Strauser
pgpJ2aFH5pyri.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 08:40:21AM -0500, Doug Poland wrote:
> I just glanced at the latest statistics on www.bsdstats.org. In the
> last week or so OpenBSD has "overtaken" FreeBSD in the USA.
>
> Should one conclude that OpenBSD admins have enthusiastically embraced
> this project and FreeBSD a
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:27:11AM -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
> What am I doing wrong?
>
> # ll /dev/ad0s7
> crw-r- 1 root operator0, 93 Sep 4 02:30 /dev/ad0s7
> # file -s /dev/ad0s7
> /dev/ad0s7: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
> # grep -w ad0s7 /etc/fstab
> /dev/ad0s7 /lin
--On Thursday, September 14, 2006 08:40:21 -0500 Doug Poland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just glanced at the latest statistics on www.bsdstats.org. In the
last week or so OpenBSD has "overtaken" FreeBSD in the USA.
Should one conclude that OpenBSD admins have enthusiastically embraced
this
In response to Frank Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gerard Seibert wrote:
> > Frank Bonnet wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
> >
> > Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
> > SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
>
>
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:40:18 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box running behind a router/gateway. When it tries
to go into passive mode, it returns it's internal 192.168. ip address to
the client which the client stupidly uses to try to connect to. I've
confirmed this by
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
--
Cordialement
Frank Bonnet
___
In response to ograbme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello All.
>
> Thursday, September 14, 2006, 4:24:43 AM, RJ45 wrote in regards to his
> message titled "Memory problem":
>
>
>
> R> I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
>
>
>
> What does the "-p6" nomenclature represent
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
| antivirus + postgrey
| and some small a
Hello All.
Thursday, September 14, 2006, 4:24:43 AM, RJ45 wrote in regards to his
message titled "Memory problem":
R> I am running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p6 build with buildworld.
What does the "-p6" nomenclature represent in the above statement?
I've noticed some messages have contained vario
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
>
> I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
--
Gerard
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Since the BIOS reports the memory as ignored, I'd say it is your
motherboard causing the issue. You should check the manufacturer's specs
on the board and see if this is a limit to the board for the memory you are
using. Many system boards have different memory limits based on the actual
memo
That is more a matter for your router. Your router should be wrapping the
internal address with a public one. Be sure you are forwarding all the
ports needed for ftp.
-Derek
At 09:40 AM 9/14/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box running behind a router/gateway. W
Hello
Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira antivirus
+ postgrey
and some small auxiliary services.
We have approx 2500 users / mailboxes and
I have a FreeBSD 6.1 box running behind a router/gateway. When it tries
to go into passive mode, it returns it's internal 192.168. ip address to
the client which the client stupidly uses to try to connect to. I've
confirmed this by tyring to FTP from several external systems (windows &
linux). I
In the last episode (Sep 14), Ian Smith said:
> I still can't fathom what top tells me on a UP 5.5-STABLE system (300MHz
> Celeron if speed's relevant). I initiated this thread (weeks ago :) re
> seeing 0.0% idle (as expected) during buildworld but not seeing anything
> add up to anything like 100
Reko Turja wrote:
> From: "Matthias Apitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
>
> >> > I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in
> >> > the
>
> >> Fortune is part of the base system.
> >
> > Maybe I'm stupid, but I don't see it:
>
> > man
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 03:06:48PM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw
escribió:
> Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> >El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
> >escribió:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I'm missing somehow the
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
escribió:
Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
itself. If there
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
> escribió:
>
> > Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
> > > ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the for
From: "Matthias Apitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
> I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in
> the
Fortune is part of the base system.
Maybe I'm stupid, but I don't see it:
man fortune
FILES
/usr/games/fortune
/usr/sh
I just glanced at the latest statistics on www.bsdstats.org. In the
last week or so OpenBSD has "overtaken" FreeBSD in the USA.
Should one conclude that OpenBSD admins have enthusiastically embraced
this project and FreeBSD admins have not; or, is OpenBSD really more
widely deployed than FreeBSD
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 15:21 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
> escribió:
>
> > Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
> > > ports, the are Italian and R
El día Thursday, September 14, 2006 a las 02:50:56PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze
escribió:
> Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
> > ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
> > itself. If there is a Spanish
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
> ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
> itself. If there is a Spanish one a pointer would be nice too. Thx
Fortune is part of the base system.
Hi,
At Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:40:13 +0200,
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:59, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> > I'm using my laptop and tip(1) as a serial terminal. This is working well
> > when a machine is booted with the laptop connected to its serial port.
> > However, I ne
Hi,
I'm missing somehow the classic 'fortune' command and files in the
ports, the are Italian and Russian ones, but don't see the fortune
itself. If there is a Spanish one a pointer would be nice too. Thx
matthias
Linux es para gente que odia Micro$soft, FreeBSD es para los amantes de U
Hello.
This might be OT in FreeBSD list, but hopefully some of yours is
involved in sophisticated AWK programming.
To keep a small shell script portable I use awk for separating an ASCII
file from a home brewn scientific model software. The datasets of the
output is enclosed by
/begin_data_
I can boot fine with loader(8). However if I try to load kernel directly from
boot(8) I always get "BTX halted" no matter which kernel and options I choose.
The only command that works is the loader itself, /boot/loader. Why?
man 8 loader says that BTX client is the name of the loader on i386. S
On Sep 14, 2006, at 8:15 PM, Arindam wrote:
> I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
> another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
> installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and
hostname
> to this machine for both the FreeBSD an
> I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
> another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
> installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and hostname
> to this machine for both the FreeBSD and RHEL installations.
>
> While my RHEL installat
At Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:24:32 +0400,
gb wrote:
> Got hold of an old IBM X21 Thinkpad. Anyone out there have any
> recommendations for a good kernel config or whatever to squeeze the
> most of this little fellow?
a good starting point:
http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/index.pl?action=s
At Fri, 1 Sep 2006 09:54:02 -0400,
David Robillard wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea indeed. I've always followed Ralf S.
> Engelschall's instructions at http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/
> which involves using dump(8) to transfer the data onto the second disk
> once it's setup as a gmirror pro
Hi.
At Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:05:07 +0800,
musashi miyamoto wrote:
> FreeBSD mori.ranmaru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Tue Sep 5 02:09:57
> PHT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SHOGUN i386
>
>
> is there a dialup pci modem that is compatible with FreeBSD?
Lucent(Agere) M
On Sep 14, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Arindam wrote:
I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and hostname
to this machine for both the FreeBSD and RHEL insta
On 14/09/2006 04:05, Olivier Nicole wrote:
>> I don't know why. I'm running DNS server on old Celeron 400Mhz with
>> 96MB RAM just fine. Why do you think you need Xeon dual core for that?
>
> Of course I don't, and won't.
>
> I was just replying to the guy that told me that I am using archaic
> h
I have FreeBSD 6.1 installed on one machine and Fedora Core 2 on
another. I dual boot the FreeBSD 6.1 machine with a RedHat EL 4.3
installation. I have assigned the same static IP address and hostname
to this machine for both the FreeBSD and RHEL installations.
While my RHEL installation is runni
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:59, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> I'm using my laptop and tip(1) as a serial terminal. This is working well
> when a machine is booted with the laptop connected to its serial port.
> However, I need to be able to connect the laptop to a machine which was
> booted witho
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:55:09AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> RJ45 wrote:
>
> > THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
> > seen by the system.
> >
> > At boot thime I Get this warning
> >
> > 524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
>
> A normal 32bit OS can only
RJ45 wrote:
> THe system has exactly 4GB of memory but the memory is not complitely
> seen by the system.
>
> At boot thime I Get this warning
>
> 524288Kb of memory above 4GB ignored
A normal 32bit OS can only address 4GB RAM -- but your system has various
L2 and other caches built into the CP
Olivier Nicole wrote:
>> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to push
>> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reporting
>> from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ...
>
> 6 days later: Thailand jumped from 12 machines t
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
