RE: Backup Time, rule of thumb
Rule of thumb 1 - restores always take at least twice as long as backups. Rule of thumb 2 - backups never go wrong, restores always do. Rule of thumb 3 - Rules of thumb are usually optimistic. David -Original Message- From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 08:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Time, rule of thumb My rule of thumb Restore = backuptime x 2 I never past this time but it includes also the installation of a fresh OS Jan -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Time, rule of thumb Hi Does anyone have a rule of thumb for backup time ? Could we say that if the backup is more than 5 hours, it could make things more difficult for the restore (downtime). Example you restore during 7 hours to see that something went wrong. You lost 7 hours. I never had to do a disaster recovery yet, most of the time, does it take the same time approx as the backup time to restore? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Min connection speeds....
We generally allocated 4k per user in a remote office over a direct WAN link. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Min connection speeds Hi there I have a remote office of 20 users, and they are connected to us through a VPN, and they access the exchange server here. Both sites have DSL connections... The users over there have issues with the speed of the server - which is obviously directly linked to the speed of the DSL lines. My options are: Increase the speed of the DSL lines, or drop an exchange server in their branch. If I drop a machine in there - due to the cost, I would have to take an existing desktop PC and build it into an exchange server (yuck!). What do you think the min. speed of the DSL lines should be at each site? We are a somewhat smaller company (45 here and the 20 in the other office), so Biz DSL packages are all that we can deal with right now. Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox quota issue
Title: Mailbox quota issue Hy, i´ve just created a new mailbox for a user and imported a .pst (content from his old mailbox). Since he is exeeding the default quota i have set i unticked the setting for his mailbox in Xadmin. Nevertheless he still is prompted with the message that he is over quota ... ? What might cause this ? (NT4/6a, MXS 5.5/4, User OL2000SP1/OL2002) Thanks a lot Daniel "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Groupshield is the borg Resistance is futile now Uninstall wont work -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Sybari will reign In my environment soon Groupshield, kiss my ass. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Haiku Friday
Hi, Jen :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Jennifer Baker | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/21/2001 03:55 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Haiku Friday | --| Sybari will reign In my environment soon Groupshield, kiss my ass. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovering Deleted Items
Here you go... Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Client\Options] DumpsterAlwaysOn=dword:0001 http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q178/6/30.ASP D The road to a friend's house is never long. -Danish proverb -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering Deleted Items I recently rebuilt my PC and I had a utility (or registry fix, or something) that enabled me to recover deleted items from all folders, not just the deleted items folder. For instance, if a user presses (shift+delete) on an item in their inbox, I can still recover it. Does anyone know how to configure this feature? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Backup Exec Stopped Servers Been up 12 Weeks Now Really need reboot Denis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Groupshield is the borg Resistance is futile now Uninstall wont work -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Sybari will reign In my environment soon Groupshield, kiss my ass. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
number of recipients
There are some users in my company who utilize a program that enables the user to place multiple recipients in Outlook (as many as 4-5000). Aside from the fact that I hate the application, user's don't realize the ramifications that it can have, not to mention, the nastygrams that we've received from other companies for blasting over 2000 2mb attachments to them. Is there a way to restrict the number of recipients a user can sent to in Exchange 5.5? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovering Deleted Items
search TechNet for dumpsteralwayson Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering Deleted Items I recently rebuilt my PC and I had a utility (or registry fix, or something) that enabled me to recover deleted items from all folders, not just the deleted items folder. For instance, if a user presses (shift+delete) on an item in their inbox, I can still recover it. Does anyone know how to configure this feature? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovering Deleted Items
Is this it? Q178630 __ Greg Monahon Rational Software Corporation IT Corporate Postmaster v. 781.676.2435 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] w. http://terp.rational.com/email -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering Deleted Items I recently rebuilt my PC and I had a utility or registry fix, or something that enabled me to recover deleted items from all folders, not just the deleted items folder. For instance, if a user presses shift+delete on an item in their inbox, I can still recover it. Does anyone know how to configure this feature? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovering Deleted Items
Dumpsteralwayson -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering Deleted Items I recently rebuilt my PC and I had a utility (or registry fix, or something) that enabled me to recover deleted items from all folders, not just the deleted items folder. For instance, if a user presses (shift+delete) on an item in their inbox, I can still recover it. Does anyone know how to configure this feature? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: number of recipients
I think they called that ILOVEYOU I would find out the name of the program and put something in the logon script to delete it, or the AV software to treat it as a virus. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: number of recipients There are some users in my company who utilize a program that enables the user to place multiple recipients in Outlook (as many as 4-5000). Aside from the fact that I hate the application, user's don't realize the ramifications that it can have, not to mention, the nastygrams that we've received from other companies for blasting over 2000 2mb attachments to them. Is there a way to restrict the number of recipients a user can sent to in Exchange 5.5? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
I always said if I was a rock star I would do an album called Blackstone Live from Stonehenge. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Solstice is here now Wine and song at mini-henge That's in my front yard. :) -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Christmas is coming, Peace on earth, goodwill to man Love and joy to all. -Original Message- From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 December 2001 09:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Way to Go... How did you do that ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Sybari will reign In my environment soon Groupshield, kiss my ass. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Mailbox quota issue
Title: AW: Mailbox quota issue I reopened outlook several times. Even a new mailprofile (on my box) didn´t fix this. But deleting/recreating his mailbox on the server did fix it. I still don´t know what caused it, but i hadn´t the time to find out. Thanks Lori. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Dezember 2001 17:34 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: Mailbox quota issue Did you make him close his client and reopen it? (I just tell them to reboot - gives them something to do for 5 minutes.) The client can't realize the new storage requirements until he exits and enters the server again. -Original Message- From: Schatz, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox quota issue Hy, i´ve just created a new mailbox for a user and imported a .pst (content from his old mailbox). Since he is exeeding the default quota i have set i unticked the setting for his mailbox in Xadmin. Nevertheless he still is prompted with the message that he is over quota ... ? What might cause this ? (NT4/6a, MXS 5.5/4, User OL2000SP1/OL2002) Thanks a lot Daniel This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Funny, I've been working in this field for 6 years and M$ has never meant Microsoft as far as I can remember. I find it rather insulting that you do! D A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned into a pile of dust. -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Steven, I just heard the air leave the room as Martin's comment flew over your head. -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Duh. It's not appreciated here Steven and Keith, that's what we were trying to tell you without tons of flames. However your ability to detect blinding sarcasm when you see it is indeed broken. -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
As do I. I would like to remind everyone that we make a pretty good living off of all these products that Microsoft supplies. Thanks to them I can put food on the table and roof over my families head. You will not be receiving AB Approval either. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Funny, I've been working in this field for 6 years and M$ has never meant Microsoft as far as I can remember. I find it rather insulting that you do! D A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned into a pile of dust. -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox quota issue
I always recreate mailboxes when something doesnt work... and just the other day the PDC was frozen up, reformatted and reinstalled naturally... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox quota issue Ouch, that's sure using a sledgehammer on a small nail. I think you could have done something far less drastic, like a reboot of the client workstation. -Original Message- From: Schatz, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: Mailbox quota issue I reopened outlook several times. Even a new mailprofile (on my box) didn´t fix this. But deleting/recreating his mailbox on the server did fix it. I still don´t know what caused it, but i hadn´t the time to find out. Thanks Lori. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Hunter, Lori [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Dezember 2001 17:34 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: Mailbox quota issue Did you make him close his client and reopen it? (I just tell them to reboot - gives them something to do for 5 minutes.) The client can't realize the new storage requirements until he exits and enters the server again. -Original Message- From: Schatz, Daniel [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox quota issue Hy, i´ve just created a new mailbox for a user and imported a .pst (content from his old mailbox). Since he is exeeding the default quota i have set i unticked the setting for his mailbox in Xadmin. Nevertheless he still is prompted with the message that he is over quota ... ? What might cause this ? (NT4/6a, MXS 5.5/4, User OL2000SP1/OL2002) Thanks a lot Daniel This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
It's not his fault folks. After all he works for $tinson, Mag, Fizzell - a law firm. And we all know that law firms give away their services. They are a pure Pro Bono firm correct? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
AWWW, did I hurt someone's feelings, what a shame. What in the world is AB approval? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard As do I. I would like to remind everyone that we make a pretty good living off of all these products that Microsoft supplies. Thanks to them I can put food on the table and roof over my families head. You will not be receiving AB Approval either. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Funny, I've been working in this field for 6 years and M$ has never meant Microsoft as far as I can remember. I find it rather insulting that you do! D A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned into a pile of dust. -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
No, you didn't hurt anyone's feelings, but you DID lessen your chances or receiving any kind of valuable assistance in the future. D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard AWWW, did I hurt someone's feelings, what a shame. What in the world is AB approval? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard As do I. I would like to remind everyone that we make a pretty good living off of all these products that Microsoft supplies. Thanks to them I can put food on the table and roof over my families head. You will not be receiving AB Approval either. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Funny, I've been working in this field for 6 years and M$ has never meant Microsoft as far as I can remember. I find it rather insulting that you do! D A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned into a pile of dust. -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
I think the secret cabal meeting should be moved up to tonight so that this thread can be discussed... Never mind, there is no secret cabal. Please disregard. Barry - MOS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard No, you didn't hurt anyone's feelings, but you DID lessen your chances or receiving any kind of valuable assistance in the future. D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard AWWW, did I hurt someone's feelings, what a shame. What in the world is AB approval? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard As do I. I would like to remind everyone that we make a pretty good living off of all these products that Microsoft supplies. Thanks to them I can put food on the table and roof over my families head. You will not be receiving AB Approval either. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Funny, I've been working in this field for 6 years and M$ has never meant Microsoft as far as I can remember. I find it rather insulting that you do! D A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned into a pile of dust. -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
snickering Wha? Where? Who? Oh, nevermind... D The hardest thing in life is to know which bridge to cross and which to burn. -David Russell -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I think the secret cabal meeting should be moved up to tonight so that this thread can be discussed... Never mind, there is no secret cabal. Please disregard. Barry - MOS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard No, you didn't hurt anyone's feelings, but you DID lessen your chances or receiving any kind of valuable assistance in the future. D Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard AWWW, did I hurt someone's feelings, what a shame. What in the world is AB approval? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard As do I. I would like to remind everyone that we make a pretty good living off of all these products that Microsoft supplies. Thanks to them I can put food on the table and roof over my families head. You will not be receiving AB Approval either. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Funny, I've been working in this field for 6 years and M$ has never meant Microsoft as far as I can remember. I find it rather insulting that you do! D A booming voice says, Wrong, cretin!, and you notice that you have turned into a pile of dust. -Original Message- From: steven parks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Look at the context of the usage and use your imagination, it should be self explanatory. ( M$ = Microsoft, of course :-) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard What's with the M$ stuff??? Can you explain to us what that means? -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard We are preparing to merge with another firm that is also using Exchange v5.5. We are all W2K SP2 with Exchange v5.5 SP4, and they are all NT6 SP6 with Exchange v5.5 SP4. Once we have joined NT domains we will need a tool to combine the two Exchange systems, and the Move Server Wizard looks like just that tool. We also have the option to ExMerge all data out to PSTs and join the two systems that way, but assuming the wizard works correctly it seems preferable. Has anyone had any experiences with this - good or bad? Any comments from people who have been through a similar scenario that may have solved the issue differently would also be appreciated. Keith Beahm Network Engineer Stinson Mag Fizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
OWA and UTF-8
I am having a problem with Exchange 2k SP 2 and OWA. Occasionally when I reply to a message the recipient receives gobbly goop, which looks like it is encrytped or UTF-8. I am using OWA over SSL. This only happens with OWA and usually only when I reply. Example: i 0 z+Ð$Í ÈձѥqÍ¥ÑÌ Ñ¡Ä%@É M ÈAÕÍ¡4)! ! Ñ¡%%L 4(4)]Ð ä±ÐI ѥѥ4(4) Ô ÄÈ É4(4)Qá ¹Ì°4)44(4($ä´´=É¥5 4(%ɽ)è¥! ͽmÑ¼é©¥Í Ét4(%M ɤ 44(%Qm%M ȹÉÍ Í¥1 t4(%4(%M mÍ tIA Í¡4($4($4(4(% ܹ%MÍ È¹É4($4($4($ĸÐÉ ÑɥѼɽ Ñ¡É 4($ ÐÉ ÑɥѼ ÑÐ ÈÝÍ 4($̸= ɹ%@Ñ¼Í Õ¹ÑÝÍ¥ÑÌ ÑÑÙ¥4(Ĥ4($Ȥ4($иÐÉ È Ñ¥Ñ¥4($4(%)! ͽ4(%5@9Pа\,ɤ9 ɬA 4(% Í Í È¹É Í½4(%IÑ¡4($4($=É¥5 4(%ɽè5ɱͽñ½µÑ¥á½Ñ¥à¹4(%Q m%MÍ È¹ÉÍ Í¥1 t ííµ Ì¹4(%M Qè¡ Íä°È 4(%M mÍ tAÕÍ¡4($4($4(% ܹ%MÍ È¹É4($4($4(%]Ð$ Í¥] Í¡ M È Í¡4)ÈÝ4(%Í 4($4(%% Éä 她ѼÙä±ÌÉ½Ñ¡Í U ͼ$4)4(%Ñ¥Ý Í¡ÌÑ¡Ý 4($4(%QÌ°4($4($4(%5ɱͽ4(% ܹѥà¹4(%Ñ¥á½Ñ¥à¹4($4($4($4(%eÔÉ Éѱ ÕÍɥѼѡÌ%MÍ È¹ÉÍ Í¥1 4) 4(%Í É4(%QÕ¹ ÍÉ¥ÍѼ4)ÙÍ Ý Ì¹4($4($4($4($4(%eÔÉ Éѱ ÕÍɥѼѡÌ%MÍ È¹ÉÍ Í¥1 4) Ñ¥á½Ñ¥à¹4(%QÕ¹ ÍÉ¥ÍѼ4)ÙÍ Ý Ì¹4($4(4(jÙ²ry ! z+Ë¢rÖ²Ú Ë¢ NÊ rzǧujy å¨^jí½í±©bݸ:+ ã®zX( Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None â²Úh²Ø§PÛiÿü0ÂÌÇ(úÞ²«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m Ü+Þ²m§ÿðà 0Êy ¢oì׬yªÜû j·!jÊS¢éì¹» ®Þ¨¥¶^j÷ÅÈZ¥²Ì2G(L\ ©àx¸¬µ§fyb²Ö)ìÃ)är
Re: missing UDP packets?
O so glad to see this. I ahm having the exact same issue. Except I have users using both OLK 98 2K. Is the issue resolved when a user connects on a unclick mail item in Outlook? Does hitting Send/Receive numerous times have no effect? Is this the case for both outbound and inbound mail? -John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Steve Van Eck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:51 AM Subject: missing UDP packets? Recently, the client machines at my WAN sites stopped receiving new mail notifications. I have a sniffer on my exchange box and conducted two packet captures. The first is between exchange and a local machine. Outlook is open when the capture is started, and a new piece of mail is sent to the clients mailbox. The first two packets seen are UDP and sent from Exchange to the client machine, notifying it of the new mail. The second capture is between Exchange and a client on the WAN. Following the same procedure, it appears that no UDP packets are sent to that client machine. Any ideas why the Exchange machine is not sending these packets out? We are using Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 2000. The sites are connected via frame relay. There is no NAT taking place and the routers have no filters set on them. Thanks _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Testing
I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25. Should any SMTP server respond to each command? I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah.. Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and it sits there and acts stupid... no response after that. I have tried using a valid username in the domain and also tried sending to an outside address (myself) Although after I left the telnet window up for about 2 minutes the window just closed... When I telnet to our SMTP server I get responses very quick on each command. Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP Testing
All issued commands must yield a response. - Original Message - From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SMTP Testing I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25. Should any SMTP server respond to each command? I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah.. Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and it sits there and acts stupid... no response after that. I have tried using a valid username in the domain and also tried sending to an outside address (myself) Although after I left the telnet window up for about 2 minutes the window just closed... When I telnet to our SMTP server I get responses very quick on each command. Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Testing
Hmm, I wonder if this is where the email problems lies at then. There have been email problems between us and another agency. Thanks Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP Testing All issued commands must yield a response. - Original Message - From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SMTP Testing I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25. Should any SMTP server respond to each command? I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah.. Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and it sits there and acts stupid... no response after that. I have tried using a valid username in the domain and also tried sending to an outside address (myself) Although after I left the telnet window up for about 2 minutes the window just closed... When I telnet to our SMTP server I get responses very quick on each command. Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Monitoring email
sorry .. i have been absent ;-) of course ...u need www.e-nspect.co.uk now i feel better ;-) g - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:13 AM Subject: Monitoring email I need to monitor emails for 4 people in the company. Both incoming and outgoing. We think they are giving out trade secrets. What is the best method for doing this? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp3 NT4.0 sp6 Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A call ndr
Brothers and sisters, I still have the same problem after i tried is/ds adjustment. To remember: the sender of calender meeting recieves ndr voor the recipient and also in some cases some messages. When i study ndr messege i notice that the recipient which is mentioned is the old (in most cases the second mailbox of the same user which has been deleted )mailbox. for example: I send a message or a meeting request to murat but i recieve ndr for murat2 after a while i recieve thatmessage has been delivered. And the reciever has the calender meeting request. In messages case if it goes wrong he event recieve the message but if you send the same message again he recieves it. This is being irritating. Has some one has a genius idea. Exchange 5.5 sp 3 with is, mta, ds post fixes, outlook 98, nt sp6a. kind regards murat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Testing
Now I'm totally confused... I tried telnet'ing from outside to our SMTP server(on port 25) and I got a connection refused. I thought if this was the case you could not receive email from outside??? Am I wrong? I just sent an email from outside and it came right through. I can telnet from to our internal address just fine (NAT is in use) And sent email from the command line to my outside email address just fine. Is it normal for the TO: field to be blank when doing this? Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Hmm, I wonder if this is where the email problems lies at then. There have been email problems between us and another agency. Thanks Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP Testing All issued commands must yield a response. - Original Message - From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SMTP Testing I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25. Should any SMTP server respond to each command? I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah.. Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and it sits there and acts stupid... no response after that. I have tried using a valid username in the domain and also tried sending to an outside address (myself) Although after I left the telnet window up for about 2 minutes the window just closed... When I telnet to our SMTP server I get responses very quick on each command. Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Testing
Non-authoritative answer: netdoor.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = pike.netdoor.com netdoor.com MX preference = 50, mail exchanger = rock.netdoor.com I was able to coonect to pike.netdoor.com but not rock.netdoor.com on port 25. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Now I'm totally confused... I tried telnet'ing from outside to our SMTP server(on port 25) and I got a connection refused. I thought if this was the case you could not receive email from outside??? Am I wrong? I just sent an email from outside and it came right through. I can telnet from to our internal address just fine (NAT is in use) And sent email from the command line to my outside email address just fine. Is it normal for the TO: field to be blank when doing this? Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Hmm, I wonder if this is where the email problems lies at then. There have been email problems between us and another agency. Thanks Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP Testing All issued commands must yield a response. - Original Message - From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SMTP Testing I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25. Should any SMTP server respond to each command? I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah.. Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and it sits there and acts stupid... no response after that. I have tried using a valid username in the domain and also tried sending to an outside address (myself) Although after I left the telnet window up for about 2 minutes the window just closed... When I telnet to our SMTP server I get responses very quick on each command. Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP Testing
If the server side (the domain to which you are sending, your machine is considered a client in this context) does not respond with something (it MUST respond) the client will timeout and close the connection, putting the mail in a retry state. - Original Message - From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:01 PM Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Hmm, I wonder if this is where the email problems lies at then. There have been email problems between us and another agency. Thanks Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP Testing All issued commands must yield a response. - Original Message - From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SMTP Testing I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25. Should any SMTP server respond to each command? I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah.. Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and it sits there and acts stupid... no response after that. I have tried using a valid username in the domain and also tried sending to an outside address (myself) Although after I left the telnet window up for about 2 minutes the window just closed... When I telnet to our SMTP server I get responses very quick on each command. Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Testing
Well that's not the server here... That's my outside account. We are mail.mssc.state.ms.us Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Non-authoritative answer: netdoor.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = pike.netdoor.com netdoor.com MX preference = 50, mail exchanger = rock.netdoor.com I was able to coonect to pike.netdoor.com but not rock.netdoor.com on port 25. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Now I'm totally confused... I tried telnet'ing from outside to our SMTP server(on port 25) and I got a connection refused. I thought if this was the case you could not receive email from outside??? Am I wrong? I just sent an email from outside and it came right through. I can telnet from to our internal address just fine (NAT is in use) And sent email from the command line to my outside email address just fine. Is it normal for the TO: field to be blank when doing this? Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Hmm, I wonder if this is where the email problems lies at then. There have been email problems between us and another agency. Thanks Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP Testing All issued commands must yield a response. - Original Message - From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SMTP Testing I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25. Should any SMTP server respond to each command? I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah.. Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and it sits there and acts stupid... no response after that. I have tried using a valid username in the domain and also tried sending to an outside address (myself) Although after I left the telnet window up for about 2 minutes the window just closed... When I telnet to our SMTP server I get responses very quick on each command. Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox quot a proble m
Title: RE: Mailbox quot a proble m I don t think it s that drastic since i created the mailbox just 1 h before. All i did is delete, recreate and reimport the .pst from his old mailbox. btw. i did reboot the workstation and i did test the mailbox on another workstation. Nevertheless i didn t have time to look further for the cause since the user is twice the size of me and not too patient :) As i said - thanks. -Original Message- From: Andy David To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 21.12.01 17:09 Subject: RE: Mailbox quota issue I always recreate mailboxes when something doesnt work... and just the other day the PDC was frozen up, reformatted and reinstalled naturally... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox quota issue Ouch, that's sure using a sledgehammer on a small nail. I think you could have done something far less drastic, like a reboot of the client workstation. "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A call ndr
I am sure there is a tool in the bork that fixes this, and it might be the one known as clean sweep, but look up what's in there and look at the help files. I'm also sure that it's in the archives, but those are known to be less than reliable. -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A call ndr Brothers and sisters, I still have the same problem after i tried is/ds adjustment. To remember: the sender of calender meeting recieves ndr voor the recipient and also in some cases some messages. When i study ndr messege i notice that the recipient which is mentioned is the old (in most cases the second mailbox of the same user which has been deleted )mailbox. for example: I send a message or a meeting request to murat but i recieve ndr for murat2 after a while i recieve thatmessage has been delivered. And the reciever has the calender meeting request. In messages case if it goes wrong he event recieve the message but if you send the same message again he recieves it. This is being irritating. Has some one has a genius idea. Exchange 5.5 sp 3 with is, mta, ds post fixes, outlook 98, nt sp6a. kind regards murat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recovering Deleted Items
Thanks everyone. I appreciate it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tumbleweed Antivirus?
We currently use Trend Micro Scanmail 3.52 and I couldn't be any happier with it. However, there is a plan in place to globally purchase the Tumbleweed Product. 'They' want to know if we are intersted in using it if they do purchase for the entire site. Does anyone have any experience with Tumbleweed? I've never heard of it and their website is a bit vague. I would have a very hard time scrapping scanmail, they have saved our butts many times. Maybe I could make a dual effort fighting the virus attacks. thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: number of recipients
Thanks! I'm psyched! I can stop the spammers of my company _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus?
I would stay with Scanmail. Why dump something that works perfect -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Antivirus? We currently use Trend Micro Scanmail 3.52 and I couldn't be any happier with it. However, there is a plan in place to globally purchase the Tumbleweed Product. 'They' want to know if we are intersted in using it if they do purchase for the entire site. Does anyone have any experience with Tumbleweed? I've never heard of it and their website is a bit vague. I would have a very hard time scrapping scanmail, they have saved our butts many times. Maybe I could make a dual effort fighting the virus attacks. thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus?
We use the Tumbleweed MMS here. I have to admit I miss Antigen, but Tumbleweed seems up to the anti-virus task. And it allows you to add really neat disclaimers to all your emails... -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Antivirus? We currently use Trend Micro Scanmail 3.52 and I couldn't be any happier with it. However, there is a plan in place to globally purchase the Tumbleweed Product. 'They' want to know if we are intersted in using it if they do purchase for the entire site. Does anyone have any experience with Tumbleweed? I've never heard of it and their website is a bit vague. I would have a very hard time scrapping scanmail, they have saved our butts many times. Maybe I could make a dual effort fighting the virus attacks. thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus?
LOL. Even when you don't want them? :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus? We use the Tumbleweed MMS here. I have to admit I miss Antigen, but Tumbleweed seems up to the anti-virus task. And it allows you to add really neat disclaimers to all your emails... -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Antivirus? We currently use Trend Micro Scanmail 3.52 and I couldn't be any happier with it. However, there is a plan in place to globally purchase the Tumbleweed Product. 'They' want to know if we are intersted in using it if they do purchase for the entire site. Does anyone have any experience with Tumbleweed? I've never heard of it and their website is a bit vague. I would have a very hard time scrapping scanmail, they have saved our butts many times. Maybe I could make a dual effort fighting the virus attacks. thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus?
I would not dump scanmail...maybe I could leave Trend on the internet gateway and run Tumbleweed internally in order to have dual coverage. just an idea. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus? I would stay with Scanmail. Why dump something that works perfect -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Antivirus? We currently use Trend Micro Scanmail 3.52 and I couldn't be any happier with it. However, there is a plan in place to globally purchase the Tumbleweed Product. 'They' want to know if we are intersted in using it if they do purchase for the entire site. Does anyone have any experience with Tumbleweed? I've never heard of it and their website is a bit vague. I would have a very hard time scrapping scanmail, they have saved our butts many times. Maybe I could make a dual effort fighting the virus attacks. thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forwarding mail to another domain
Using exchange 2000 is there any way of forwarding mail to another domain i.e. I have set exchange up to recieve [EMAIL PROTECTED] and want mail to automatically forwarded on to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have potentially hundreds of users that will want mail forwarding so I dont want to put each user into A.D. Is this possible, if so How? Thanks Carl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forwarding mail to another domain
Using exchange 2000 is there any way of forwarding mail to another domain i.e. I have set exchange up to recieve [EMAIL PROTECTED] and want mail to automatically forwarded on to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have potentially hundreds of users that will want mail forwarding so I dont want to put each user into A.D. Is this possible, if so How? Thanks Carl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forwarding mail to another domain.
Using exchange 2000 is there any way of forwarding mail to another domain, i.e. I have set exchange up to recieve [EMAIL PROTECTED] and want mail to automatically forwarded on to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have potentially hundreds of users that will want mail forwarding so I dont want to put each user into A.D. Is this possible, if so How? Thanks Carl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA access problem.
I have an Exchange 2000 box sp2 that is having an OWA access problem. All IE clients 5.0 and up (which use Kerberos Authentication) do not get full access to mail folders. When one of these clients connects, two messages pop up stating (an internal server error has occurred). No items in the inbox appear and the (folders button) doesn't work. The only Icon that really works is the Calender, address lists also work. I'm not testing through a firewall and this is not a frontend-backend server situation. Just a lan connection through 1 switch. IE 4.0 and Netscape connect and work normally although it's the pre sp2 look and feel. My pc and server times are synced. Permissions to web shares and folder access appear correct. We do have ISA implemented and I tested ssl to see if the isa server was picking off dhtml and xml transmissions, but the problem still persisted with ssl enabled. The IIS server logs show that Kerberos connections are working. I really can't tell if the problem is Kerberos, permissions, or dhtml/xml being blocked, or something else. Has any one seen this before or does anyone have any Ideas? Your assistance is appreciated! Jon Hussey. Shields Bag Printing Co. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Exmerge is on the W2K CD??? Off to go check that out... D There are many paths to the top of the mountain, but only one view. -Harry Millner -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Allowing internal SMTP but not external
Thanks to all for the great suggestions. I'm pushing the idea of [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can receive SMTP e-mails from the inside world. As it happens the sending program on the AS/400 simply connects to port 25 on the Exchange box so there is no need for MX records, we just told IMS that .internal should be routed inbound. The only down side is that users can still send e-mail. We can't disable all outbound SMTP on the server since there are some users that are allowed real addresses. When we presented our idea of invalid smtp addresses the response we got was we can't give these users access to the internet which isn't exactly what we are suggesting so I think it's time to thwap a customer or two. If someone could suggest an idea to prevent these users with invalid SMTP address from SENDING to the net while allowing users with valid SMTP to send we'd be all set, but I appreciate all the help I've received so far. May everyone have a happy and healthy holiday! -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 02:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allowing internal SMTP but not external Hi Walden How about this as solution?? 1.) Remove the valid internet addresses from the users. 2.) Create invalid, from the perspective of the Internet, addresses for the users who need to get the mail from the AS400. Route this address as inbound. 3.) Configure the SMTP service on the AS 400 to deliver mail to the invalid address directly to the IMS of the Exchange server. 4.) Configure the IMS on Exchange to deliver replies directly to the IMS. The only issue that I can see is that these users will still be able to send mail out but will not receive replies since they don't have valid SMTP addresses. Regards Peter Johnson -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 December 2001 23:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Allowing internal SMTP but not external OK, I think I know the answer to this, but I told a customer I'd ask. I have a customer that wants to limit users from receiving email from the internet. No problem, remove the SMTP address and they won't be able to send/receive SMTP mail. However, now they have a requirement for these users to receive SMTP mail from an internal machine (AS/400 sending e-mail to local users). Short of going to the SMTP proxy (Firewall-1) and saying drop messages for user1 and user2 and user3 etc. there is no way I can see of preventing external SMTP mail while allowing internal SMTP mail. Did I miss something? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use, distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. When addressed to clients of the company from where this e-mail originates (the sending company ) any opinion or advice contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable terms of business or client engagement letter . The sending company does not accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or from the accessing of any files attached to this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
I meant to say the Exchange CD rom under support\utils It will baulk about dlls but just add a path statement pointing to your exchsrvr\bin directory Minor faux paus smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Exmerge is on the W2K CD??? Off to go check that out... D There are many paths to the top of the mountain, but only one view. -Harry Millner -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail
I have a public folder with an SMTP address. I currently have the Default user permissions set to None, but with that setting I can't receive SMTP mail. If I give Default create rights I'm fine, but is there a user I can add that would only allow the IMS to create messages in there? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Ahhh... I thought that might be the case. ;o) D I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan Hale -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I meant to say the Exchange CD rom under support\utils It will baulk about dlls but just add a path statement pointing to your exchsrvr\bin directory Minor faux paus smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Exmerge is on the W2K CD??? Off to go check that out... D There are many paths to the top of the mountain, but only one view. -Harry Millner -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Allowing internal SMTP but not external
After I hit send I came up with the solution. On the IMS there is a delivery restriction tab, if I add the users that aren't allowed to send outbound e-mail to the tab (or add a DL to the tab and the users to the DL) my problem is solved. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 15:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allowing internal SMTP but not external Thanks to all for the great suggestions. I'm pushing the idea of [EMAIL PROTECTED] so they can receive SMTP e-mails from the inside world. As it happens the sending program on the AS/400 simply connects to port 25 on the Exchange box so there is no need for MX records, we just told IMS that .internal should be routed inbound. The only down side is that users can still send e-mail. We can't disable all outbound SMTP on the server since there are some users that are allowed real addresses. When we presented our idea of invalid smtp addresses the response we got was we can't give these users access to the internet which isn't exactly what we are suggesting so I think it's time to thwap a customer or two. If someone could suggest an idea to prevent these users with invalid SMTP address from SENDING to the net while allowing users with valid SMTP to send we'd be all set, but I appreciate all the help I've received so far. May everyone have a happy and healthy holiday! -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 02:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allowing internal SMTP but not external Hi Walden How about this as solution?? 1.) Remove the valid internet addresses from the users. 2.) Create invalid, from the perspective of the Internet, addresses for the users who need to get the mail from the AS400. Route this address as inbound. 3.) Configure the SMTP service on the AS 400 to deliver mail to the invalid address directly to the IMS of the Exchange server. 4.) Configure the IMS on Exchange to deliver replies directly to the IMS. The only issue that I can see is that these users will still be able to send mail out but will not receive replies since they don't have valid SMTP addresses. Regards Peter Johnson -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 December 2001 23:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Allowing internal SMTP but not external OK, I think I know the answer to this, but I told a customer I'd ask. I have a customer that wants to limit users from receiving email from the internet. No problem, remove the SMTP address and they won't be able to send/receive SMTP mail. However, now they have a requirement for these users to receive SMTP mail from an internal machine (AS/400 sending e-mail to local users). Short of going to the SMTP proxy (Firewall-1) and saying drop messages for user1 and user2 and user3 etc. there is no way I can see of preventing external SMTP mail while allowing internal SMTP mail. Did I miss something? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use, distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. When addressed to clients of the company from where this e-mail originates (the sending company ) any opinion or advice contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable terms of business or client engagement letter . The sending company does not accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or from the accessing of any files attached to this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: SMTP Testing
D'OH! My bad. I don't think it was this way a year or so ago... we have to go through the state's main network center. But, before we could telnet to our mail server from outside. Now they appear to have reconfigured things so that our MX record points to their gateway... and then they forward to us. mssc.state.ms.uspreference = 20, mail exchanger = mx1.state.ms.us mssc.state.ms.uspreference = 10, mail exchanger = mailr.state.ms.us By telnet'ing there I got through. But, it was the gateway server I was on. I was able to send an email from the command line from outside to my internal address. It's all good. Thanks, Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Now I'm totally confused... I tried telnet'ing from outside to our SMTP server(on port 25) and I got a connection refused. I thought if this was the case you could not receive email from outside??? Am I wrong? I just sent an email from outside and it came right through. I can telnet from to our internal address just fine (NAT is in use) And sent email from the command line to my outside email address just fine. Is it normal for the TO: field to be blank when doing this? Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barry Patterson Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Testing Hmm, I wonder if this is where the email problems lies at then. There have been email problems between us and another agency. Thanks Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP Testing All issued commands must yield a response. - Original Message - From: Barry Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SMTP Testing I am helping someone test SMTP through telnetting into port 25. Should any SMTP server respond to each command? I do a 'mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and after a couple of seconds it respnds OK, blah.. Then I do 'rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][ENTER]' and it sits there and acts stupid... no response after that. I have tried using a valid username in the domain and also tried sending to an outside address (myself) Although after I left the telnet window up for about 2 minutes the window just closed... When I telnet to our SMTP server I get responses very quick on each command. Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO
Our Exchange Server and Web Server are on different machines which we believe is causing our problem. We are trying to access public folder data on the Exchange Server and can't find a way that is acceptable. ExOLEDB can only be used on a single-server system. So when we try to use Set objSession = Server.CreateObject(MAPI.Session), we get an Invalid ProgID error...we installed Outlook 2000 on our Web Server to get the MAPI dlls on the Web Server, but we continue to get the Invalid ProgID error. Any suggestions? We've been working on this for over a week. Thanks, Lisa Horton AgTrax Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Of course, you must understand that most of us realize that the SIS is broke when exmerge is run, but not supported by MS??? Doubt it... D A TV can insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like a computer. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
You're missing the point. It's not FULLY supported. For example, if you run ExMerge, and it crashes your machine due to a bug, there is no guarantee that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in \support\utils\readme.doc. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Next thing you will be telling me its under warranty product Most people on this list have been around exmerge and its various revisons and even the pst exporters pre exmerge!. As you know it was a BORK product and now has been placed on a mainstream product and in this case I think this has been a techie request and not a marketing ploy. Everyone is entitled to their viewpoint so I leave it at that. smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO
What is the easiest way to obtain exoledb.dll to register it on the web server? Do you know if we can pull it from the exchange server and then register it on the web server? -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO Install the ExOLEDB provider on the web server. -Original Message- From: Lisa Horton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO Our Exchange Server and Web Server are on different machines which we believe is causing our problem. We are trying to access public folder data on the Exchange Server and can't find a way that is acceptable. ExOLEDB can only be used on a single-server system. So when we try to use Set objSession = Server.CreateObject(MAPI.Session), we get an Invalid ProgID error...we installed Outlook 2000 on our Web Server to get the MAPI dlls on the Web Server, but we continue to get the Invalid ProgID error. Any suggestions? We've been working on this for over a week. Thanks, Lisa Horton AgTrax Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Certainly everyone is entitled to their viewpoint. I was simply stating the fact that from my experience, I prefer Move Server over ExMerge, then I listed a few reasons, one of them being that Move Server is fully supported, while ExMerge is not. To some customers, that reason alone is enough to use the tool that I prefer them using. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Next thing you will be telling me its under warranty product Most people on this list have been around exmerge and its various revisons and even the pst exporters pre exmerge!. As you know it was a BORK product and now has been placed on a mainstream product and in this case I think this has been a techie request and not a marketing ploy. Everyone is entitled to their viewpoint so I leave it at that. smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Strange, I've never seen Exmerge crash my server, but I suppose there is a possibility. Then again, wouldn't ISScan have the same potential impact? We (the general we) run these utilities occasionally for virus outbreaks, etc... These are the supported methods to ripping stuff out of the IS during these types of outbreaks. So how may I ask do you propose admins take care of their server then? Most of us know that there are different versions of Exmerge for the different levels of Exchange, now if this utility is buggy as you say, why do we Exchange professionals out in the real world use it? Why has it been suggested we use it? Or are you quoting how MS wants it done? For those of us in the real world, there is the MS way and there is the real way. Are you telling me I've been doing it wrong for the last 6 years? At any rate, there is a risk involved any time you do anything to the exchange server databases. That's like saying that eseutil is NOT supported because it can crash the server. I'm just curious to your position on all of this. Being a part of MS, I know you can't divulge your honest opinion, but throw me a bone. I've been working with Exchange since it was born, so... I'm a bit curious. I'm certainly not saying you're wrong, but you have my attention for the minute. D It's not your blue blood, your pedigree or your college degree. It's what you do with your life that counts. -Millard Fuller -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard You're missing the point. It's not FULLY supported. For example, if you run ExMerge, and it crashes your machine due to a bug, there is no guarantee that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in \support\utils\readme.doc. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
I'm curious as to which part of MS you work in... The Exchange team? PSS? MCS? D Press any key to continue or any other key to quit... -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Certainly everyone is entitled to their viewpoint. I was simply stating the fact that from my experience, I prefer Move Server over ExMerge, then I listed a few reasons, one of them being that Move Server is fully supported, while ExMerge is not. To some customers, that reason alone is enough to use the tool that I prefer them using. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Next thing you will be telling me its under warranty product Most people on this list have been around exmerge and its various revisons and even the pst exporters pre exmerge!. As you know it was a BORK product and now has been placed on a mainstream product and in this case I think this has been a techie request and not a marketing ploy. Everyone is entitled to their viewpoint so I leave it at that. smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Publisher -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I'm curious as to which part of MS you work in... The Exchange team? PSS? MCS? D Press any key to continue or any other key to quit... -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Certainly everyone is entitled to their viewpoint. I was simply stating the fact that from my experience, I prefer Move Server over ExMerge, then I listed a few reasons, one of them being that Move Server is fully supported, while ExMerge is not. To some customers, that reason alone is enough to use the tool that I prefer them using. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Next thing you will be telling me its under warranty product Most people on this list have been around exmerge and its various revisons and even the pst exporters pre exmerge!. As you know it was a BORK product and now has been placed on a mainstream product and in this case I think this has been a techie request and not a marketing ploy. Everyone is entitled to their viewpoint so I leave it at that. smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Lingering errors/problems after exch2k install
Hi Everyone,
Thanks in advance for your help. I have recently added an exch 2000 server to a 5.5
site, moved over all the folders and mailboxes, removed the 5.5 server (according to
technet) and cut over to Exchange 2000 Native mode. I am still having three problems,
that have been with me since the first introduction of this server to the network.
#1. Every one minute on a domain controller I get the following Security Log Failure
Audit:
Event Type: Failure Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Directory Service Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 12/21/2001
Time: 4:45:21 AM
User: DOMAIN_NAME\EXCH2K_SERVER$
Computer: DC_SERVER_NAME
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: DS
Object Type:configuration
Object Name:CN=Configuration,DC=some,DC=company,DC=com
New Handle ID: -
Operation ID: {0,449887097}
Process ID: 304
Primary User Name: DC_SERVER_NAME$
Primary Domain: DOMAIN_NAME
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: EXCH2K_SERVER$
Client Domain: DOMAIN_NAME
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x1AD0BB6D)
AccessesControl Access
Privileges -
Properties:
READ_CONTROL
Create Child
Delete Child
List Contents
Write Self
Delete Tree
Manage Replication Topology
The Exchange Enterprise servers group has manage replication topology rights on the
domain container. I am at a loss as to why this keeps happening. Anyone?
#2. I have 4 former employees that show up in the GAL - they are not listed as having
mailboxes in the ESM console. In AD Users and Computers I can see their email
addresses, but cannot edit/delete them or Hide from the Address Book. The accounts
are disabled, although it is the same if I re-enable them. Under All Exchange Tasks
the only choice I have is to enable instant messaging, a feature we do not use. Any
thoughts on how to get them out of the GAL?
#3. The administrators group is getting the NDRs for every bad message that comes to
us - about 200 a day. The send copy of Non-Delivery Report to: field in the
properties for the default SMTP Virtual server is blank. Do you think this could be
related to the fact I have set up one SMTP connector (our only connector)? Do I need
that connector? We have a simple single domain with 150 users, all on Win2k, one
Exchange 2000 mail server, internal win2k DNS that forwards requests to our ISP, and a
T1 to our ISP.
Merry Christmas - and thanks for your insights.
Timothy J. Hooks
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Ok, let me ellaborate on this a little bit. I work in PSS, in a group close to the group that the individual who originially wrote ExMerge worked in. That individual maintained the ExMerge code for several years. That individual has now moved to MCS, and is no longer maintaining that code. I'm not saying that it's buggy. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with it. I'm not saying that you shouldn't use it. What I'm saying is that a lot of time and effort was used to delevop and test the Move Server Wizard. It is fully supported, and there are code maintainers for it. For moving servers between sites or orgs, in my opinion, Move Server is the best, hands down. I will recommend it each and every time the question is asked. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Strange, I've never seen Exmerge crash my server, but I suppose there is a possibility. Then again, wouldn't ISScan have the same potential impact? We (the general we) run these utilities occasionally for virus outbreaks, etc... These are the supported methods to ripping stuff out of the IS during these types of outbreaks. So how may I ask do you propose admins take care of their server then? Most of us know that there are different versions of Exmerge for the different levels of Exchange, now if this utility is buggy as you say, why do we Exchange professionals out in the real world use it? Why has it been suggested we use it? Or are you quoting how MS wants it done? For those of us in the real world, there is the MS way and there is the real way. Are you telling me I've been doing it wrong for the last 6 years? At any rate, there is a risk involved any time you do anything to the exchange server databases. That's like saying that eseutil is NOT supported because it can crash the server. I'm just curious to your position on all of this. Being a part of MS, I know you can't divulge your honest opinion, but throw me a bone. I've been working with Exchange since it was born, so... I'm a bit curious. I'm certainly not saying you're wrong, but you have my attention for the minute. D It's not your blue blood, your pedigree or your college degree. It's what you do with your life that counts. -Millard Fuller -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard You're missing the point. It's not FULLY supported. For example, if you run ExMerge, and it crashes your machine due to a bug, there is no guarantee that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in \support\utils\readme.doc. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
um... actually, I've been doing a lot of work with the BORK and the tools, and many of them aren't supported fully. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Remember the story of the guy on the beach surrounded by dying starfish that were washed ashore. There are thousands upon thousands lying in the sun. He tosses them back one at a time and someone walks up to him and asks, Why bother? You can't get them all. It won't make any difference. And the first guy picks up another and tosses it back into the ocean and replies, Made a difference to that one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McGilligan, Sean Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Next thing you will be telling me its under warranty product Most people on this list have been around exmerge and its various revisons and even the pst exporters pre exmerge!. As you know it was a BORK product and now has been placed on a mainstream product and in this case I think this has been a techie request and not a marketing ploy. Everyone is entitled to their viewpoint so I leave it at that. smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail
No. You have to give anonymous the permission. - Original Message - From: Walden H. Leverich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail I have a public folder with an SMTP address. I currently have the Default user permissions set to None, but with that setting I can't receive SMTP mail. If I give Default create rights I'm fine, but is there a user I can add that would only allow the IMS to create messages in there? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Yes, Alex works for my erstwhile employer. ;) Exmerge was written by a PSS employee (a personal friend of mine here in TX). Utilities written like that, instead of out of Dev, are not expressly supported by MS. They are classed as BORK utilites; best-effort support. - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:47 PM Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is fully supported, which is more than I can say for exmerge. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Well since you kind of apologized. We prefer Exmerge [1] over Move Server. We have found that we can be at the bar drinking much quicker with the Exmerge process. [1] Especially with the Iron Chef Exmerge-Roger Seielstad add-on module -Original Message- From: Keith Beahm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, so I give. M$ was meant to convey Microsoft. Is this better - MS Exchange Move Server Wizard? I've been reading this column for the last year now. I knew to expect the sarcasm, but I was also hoping to benefit from your global wisdom. Thanks and Merry Christmas to all. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
Understandable... I perform migrations both ways, it really depends on the scenario involved, but I see where you're going with this. D A successful person is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks that others throw at him. -David Brink -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, let me ellaborate on this a little bit. I work in PSS, in a group close to the group that the individual who originially wrote ExMerge worked in. That individual maintained the ExMerge code for several years. That individual has now moved to MCS, and is no longer maintaining that code. I'm not saying that it's buggy. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with it. I'm not saying that you shouldn't use it. What I'm saying is that a lot of time and effort was used to delevop and test the Move Server Wizard. It is fully supported, and there are code maintainers for it. For moving servers between sites or orgs, in my opinion, Move Server is the best, hands down. I will recommend it each and every time the question is asked. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Strange, I've never seen Exmerge crash my server, but I suppose there is a possibility. Then again, wouldn't ISScan have the same potential impact? We (the general we) run these utilities occasionally for virus outbreaks, etc... These are the supported methods to ripping stuff out of the IS during these types of outbreaks. So how may I ask do you propose admins take care of their server then? Most of us know that there are different versions of Exmerge for the different levels of Exchange, now if this utility is buggy as you say, why do we Exchange professionals out in the real world use it? Why has it been suggested we use it? Or are you quoting how MS wants it done? For those of us in the real world, there is the MS way and there is the real way. Are you telling me I've been doing it wrong for the last 6 years? At any rate, there is a risk involved any time you do anything to the exchange server databases. That's like saying that eseutil is NOT supported because it can crash the server. I'm just curious to your position on all of this. Being a part of MS, I know you can't divulge your honest opinion, but throw me a bone. I've been working with Exchange since it was born, so... I'm a bit curious. I'm certainly not saying you're wrong, but you have my attention for the minute. D It's not your blue blood, your pedigree or your college degree. It's what you do with your life that counts. -Millard Fuller -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard You're missing the point. It's not FULLY supported. For example, if you run ExMerge, and it crashes your machine due to a bug, there is no guarantee that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in \support\utils\readme.doc. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Gentlemen, This is a horse for courses scenario and not; there can only be one method. It depends on what you want to achieve. And Exmerge does ship with windows 2000 CD-rom (w2k only product though) My pennies worth Merry Xmas smcgilligan -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 21 2001 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard I prefer the move server process. As long as you're using the latest store.exe and mvstore.dll, and your database is in acceptable shape, move server will get you where you're going much faster, plus you keep single instance storage. On top of that, move server is
RE: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail
Actually, if I give Default the 'create' right all is good, I've tried it. (EX5.5) But I'm wondering if I can give the specific IMS user (if one exists) the right. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 16:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail No. You have to give anonymous the permission. - Original Message - From: Walden H. Leverich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail I have a public folder with an SMTP address. I currently have the Default user permissions set to None, but with that setting I can't receive SMTP mail. If I give Default create rights I'm fine, but is there a user I can add that would only allow the IMS to create messages in there? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard
We are in the process of planning a migration and have looked at Move Server Wizard and would definitely choose it over Exmerge. Not just for Single instance storage but also to maintain the links between calendars for meetings. People hate it when after the move, cancelled meetings are not removed from their calendars after acting on a cancellation notice. But one thing that we don't know for sure, If you use Move Server Wizard for a multi site organization, will you break the meetings that span sites? Will you break meetings that span servers in a single site? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Understandable... I perform migrations both ways, it really depends on the scenario involved, but I see where you're going with this. D A successful person is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks that others throw at him. -David Brink -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Ok, let me ellaborate on this a little bit. I work in PSS, in a group close to the group that the individual who originially wrote ExMerge worked in. That individual maintained the ExMerge code for several years. That individual has now moved to MCS, and is no longer maintaining that code. I'm not saying that it's buggy. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with it. I'm not saying that you shouldn't use it. What I'm saying is that a lot of time and effort was used to delevop and test the Move Server Wizard. It is fully supported, and there are code maintainers for it. For moving servers between sites or orgs, in my opinion, Move Server is the best, hands down. I will recommend it each and every time the question is asked. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Strange, I've never seen Exmerge crash my server, but I suppose there is a possibility. Then again, wouldn't ISScan have the same potential impact? We (the general we) run these utilities occasionally for virus outbreaks, etc... These are the supported methods to ripping stuff out of the IS during these types of outbreaks. So how may I ask do you propose admins take care of their server then? Most of us know that there are different versions of Exmerge for the different levels of Exchange, now if this utility is buggy as you say, why do we Exchange professionals out in the real world use it? Why has it been suggested we use it? Or are you quoting how MS wants it done? For those of us in the real world, there is the MS way and there is the real way. Are you telling me I've been doing it wrong for the last 6 years? At any rate, there is a risk involved any time you do anything to the exchange server databases. That's like saying that eseutil is NOT supported because it can crash the server. I'm just curious to your position on all of this. Being a part of MS, I know you can't divulge your honest opinion, but throw me a bone. I've been working with Exchange since it was born, so... I'm a bit curious. I'm certainly not saying you're wrong, but you have my attention for the minute. D It's not your blue blood, your pedigree or your college degree. It's what you do with your life that counts. -Millard Fuller -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard You're missing the point. It's not FULLY supported. For example, if you run ExMerge, and it crashes your machine due to a bug, there is no guarantee that it will be fixed. See the disclaimer in \support\utils\readme.doc. Thanks, aseigler -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard Alex, I see that you have an MS.com email addy so I for some reason will assume you work there. Where are you getting the bright idea that exmerge is NOT supported by MS or even PSS for that matter? Not that I ever call on you guys, but I would say that exmerge has been supported for longer than you been employed there. D The secret to success is to know something nobody else knows. -Aristotle Onassis -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M$ Exchange Move Server Wizard The fact that it is on the CD does not make it fully supported. -aseigler -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:36 PM To:
RE: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO
Nevermind...we figured out a way around it...FINALLY! Have a great weekend! -Original Message- From: Lisa Horton Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO What is the easiest way to obtain exoledb.dll to register it on the web server? Do you know if we can pull it from the exchange server and then register it on the web server? -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO Install the ExOLEDB provider on the web server. -Original Message- From: Lisa Horton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trouble accessing the Exchange Server with CDO Our Exchange Server and Web Server are on different machines which we believe is causing our problem. We are trying to access public folder data on the Exchange Server and can't find a way that is acceptable. ExOLEDB can only be used on a single-server system. So when we try to use Set objSession = Server.CreateObject(MAPI.Session), we get an Invalid ProgID error...we installed Outlook 2000 on our Web Server to get the MAPI dlls on the Web Server, but we continue to get the Invalid ProgID error. Any suggestions? We've been working on this for over a week. Thanks, Lisa Horton AgTrax Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access Exchange 2000 through the firewall? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
They are just different. I like the portability of OWA. If using IMAP, I would chose IMAP over SSL though (port 993). And is WebMeister your real name? ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: WebMeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access Exchange 2000 through the firewall? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
WebMeister MeisterBurger -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP They are just different. I like the portability of OWA. If using IMAP, I would chose IMAP over SSL though (port 993). And is WebMeister your real name? ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: WebMeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access Exchange 2000 through the firewall? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
m Portobello Mushrooms... -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP They are just different. I like the portability of OWA. If using IMAP, I would chose IMAP over SSL though (port 993). And is WebMeister your real name? ;) William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ --- Why just ride, when you can fly? http://www.airborne.net --- Rent this space: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: WebMeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access Exchange 2000 through the firewall? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
outlook Trend scanmail
Hi I have a problem: Scanmail strips all infected attachments but the users' outlook still crashes when they have the preview pane open. This is costing a lot of time and effort to fix. I sthere any way around it? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOA
I have been trying to post a message the has Out o' Off. Asst. in the body and it doesn't get posted. Is there a way to turn this on for Eudora pop clients? This is a setting at the mailbox level is it not? Could you not use an ADSI editor to flip a switch or something? This is for Exchange 5.5. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitoring email
Of course, alternate recipient won't catch outbound mail. Message journaling would catch everything. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Di Nardo Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 7:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring email Set an alternate recipient up to receive copies of all inbound mail to them (I would use a public folder for this - properly locked down of course); crank up diagnostic logging and log the IMS as William and Martian suggested. You know, it would only take a couple hours to build a monitoring server. You could use a desktop system for this since you're only putting four people on in. Get to work a couple hours early, build the box, and solve your problem the right way. It's a lot easier to bring them to court with the kind of info you would get using this method. Just my $.02 Tom. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring email Hi, Thanks for the suggestion, but short of that, what could I do first thing tomorrow morning? What kind of logging is Exchange capable of? -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring email Journaling. It is probably best to build a monitoring server and enable journaling on that server. Move the mailboxes in question to that server. Take a look at Q239427 Tom. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitoring email I need to monitor emails for 4 people in the company. Both incoming and outgoing. We think they are giving out trade secrets. What is the best method for doing this? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp3 NT4.0 sp6 Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: return message
What's a return message? ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: return message Hi, how do I set a return message for a whole user group in Exch 2K? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lotus Notes Problem
Do the Eurpoe users have a different address space and is the Lotes connector configured to properly route to it? ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Problem Yes they do. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 1:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Lotus Notes Problem Do the Europe users show up in your GAL? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Lotus Notes Problem All, I have this really weird problem with (I think) our Notes connector. Ok, we have users in the US and Europe. WHen we send email to users in the US they send/receive email just fine. But if we send them to the Europe users we get the error message: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Userslastname, User on 12/19/2001 3:04 PM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Organization;l=Exchange Server-011219200331Z-12404 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Site:Exchange Server Why would I be able to send email to the US and not the Europe users? Has anyone experienced this problem before? Please help if you have seen this or might know what the problem might be. Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GAL and Address Book Views
There is one Global Address List. Users either have permission to see it or not. ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith, Calvin C Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GAL and Address Book Views In Exchange 5.5 on NT 4. In my test environment, I have created Address Book Views. Then I set an anonymous account on the DS Site Configuration. I also gave the search permission to the service account for the Organization and gave search permission to Domain Users for the Address Book Views. There are two views and the permission is given at the root. I did all this in an effort to control which folders of addresses the users would see when they run Outlook. It all works fine except for one issue: When running Outlook and checking the Address Book the entries under Global Address List only include records seen in one of the Address Book Views. Both address book views are listed below the Global Address List and they show the addresses that would be expected. I thought that Global Address List would contain all the records that could be seen in the address folders shown below it. Can anybody tell me why Global Address List in Outlook doesn't contain all the addresses shown in the Address Book Views listed below it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dat Files
Whre are the .DAT files? ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dat Files Hi Can the .DAT files in Exchange be deleted? They are backed up, and I was thinking of backing up just the IS /DS database instead of the whole C and D: drive, is it neccasry to back up C, AND D drives? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Give access to another users tasks and calander only?
Why, is he cooking spaghetti? ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dustin Krysak Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Give access to another users tasks and calander only? Hi there... Is there a way to give access to a user to access another users colander and tasks only? I know they can use the file open another users folder - but I don't want them to have access to the inbox it self. Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why Outlook establishes multiple connections to multiple Exchangeservers
The answer is simple: It is by design. ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phillip Yan Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why Outlook establishes multiple connections to multiple Exchange servers This is the output from netstat -a. Why Outlook opens so many RPC connections to multiple Exchange servers even though only mailbox is configured in Outlook profile? The problem we have encountered here is kind of strange to us. We moved all mailboxes and public folders from one server (EXCH01) to another, then we powered off EXCH01 (the plan was to delete it from the site to retire it), we wanted to wait for couple days to see if everything went okay. Users that their mailboxes were moved complained Outlook login process took a long time and run very slow. Run netstat on the user's machine. We found Outlook still wanted to talk to EXCH01. The only way to solve this slow performance problem is to power EXCH01 back on. Now we have powered it on and users said the slow performance problem is gone. Not sure why Outlook still needs to talk to the old home server EXCH01. There is nothing on EXCH01. Anyone has similar problems or experiences please advise. Thanks. C:\netstat -a TCPWKS001:3728 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3729 EXCH03:1043 ESTABLISHED TCPWKS001:3730 EXCH03:1043 ESTABLISHED TCPWKS001:3731 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3733 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3734 EXCH03:1043 ESTABLISHED TCPWKS001:3735 EXCH03:1043 ESTABLISHED TCPWKS001:3736 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3738 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3739 EXCH03:1058 ESTABLISHED TCPWKS001:3742 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3743 EXCH03:1058 ESTABLISHED TCPWKS001:3744 EXCH02:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3745 EXCH02:1078 ESTABLISHED TCPWKS001:3746 EXCH04:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3747 EXCH04:1055 ESTABLISHED TCPWKS001:3748 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3749 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3750 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3751 EXCH03:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3752 EXCH01:epmap TIME_WAIT TCPWKS001:3753 EXCH01:1063 TIME_WAIT Phillip Yan Computer Services _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting permissions through site
Exchange 2000's security model doesn't really support what you're trying to do. That calls for two sites, if separating of administrative permissions is important enough to you to negate the other effects of separate sites. ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Setting permissions through site Exchange 5.5 SP4, Win 2K SP2 I have been asked if it is possible to seperate administration tasks in a site. The Exchange site is owned by two departments say A and B. Could I set granular security so that group A can only administer group A's servers and users? What are the minimum permsissions at org, site, server level to allow someone to use Exchange Administrator? Usually I just set my Exchange Admins with Permission Admins at the Org, Site and Container levels. Are their any whitepapers on this subject? My search of the Exchange site has not returned any. Thanks in advance, Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forwarding mail to another domain.
All mail for all addresses domain1, or just selected users? ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carl Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forwarding mail to another domain. Using exchange 2000 is there any way of forwarding mail to another domain, i.e. I have set exchange up to recieve [EMAIL PROTECTED] and want mail to automatically forwarded on to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have potentially hundreds of users that will want mail forwarding so I dont want to put each user into A.D. Is this possible, if so How? Thanks Carl _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Min connection speeds....
Your alternatives presume that it is the link speed itself that is causing your slowness. I wouldn't jump to that conclusion, or else you might find yourself going to the boss and requesting funds for an improvement that doesn't improve anything. ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dustin Krysak Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Min connection speeds Hi there I have a remote office of 20 users, and they are connected to us through a VPN, and they access the exchange server here. Both sites have DSL connections... The users over there have issues with the speed of the server - which is obviously directly linked to the speed of the DSL lines. My options are: Increase the speed of the DSL lines, or drop an exchange server in their branch. If I drop a machine in there - due to the cost, I would have to take an existing desktop PC and build it into an exchange server (yuck!). What do you think the min. speed of the DSL lines should be at each site? We are a somewhat smaller company (45 here and the 20 in the other office), so Biz DSL packages are all that we can deal with right now. Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Support per number of mailboxes
This has been asked and many times, though relatively infrequently. The answer is your mileage will vary, and greatly. ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Exchange Forum Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: OSEJO, JORGE; PESSIN, LINDA P Subject: Support per number of mailboxes Dear People: I haven't used the forum for quite a while and forgive me if I am asking a question that was previously asked (I couldn't find anything in the archives). Here is the question: Is there a rule of thumb for number of Exchange support people per mailbox? per server? per number of users? What is your support scenario? In other words how many servers/users/Exchange professionals in your company? Our specific case is as follows: We maintain 17 servers with around 15,000 accounts and give support to other sites (around 8 more servers). In the support we include day to day operations (backups, scanMail, outlook problems, outlook programming (VBA), etc). We are 2.5 people (including one technical manager) and we think we are under staffed. We are planning to approach Management for more bodies. Your input will allow us to support (or not support, so we stay quiet) our requests. Your help is greatly appreciated, Jorge _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and UTF-8
I asked you some of this earlier and you didn't reply. 1. Do you have any international languages installed and/or configured on the OWA server? 2. Do you have any international languages installed and/or configured on your client browser? 3. Do you have a front-end/back-end configuration? 4. Do you have any connectors to third-party messaging systems? 5. Does your mail go through any other vendors' products, gateways, pre-processing, post-processing, virus-scanning, or other steps between Exchange and the Internet? ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!™ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and UTF-8 I am having a problem with Exchange 2k SP 2 and OWA. Occasionally when I reply to a message the recipient receives gobbly goop, which looks like it is encrytped or UTF-8. I am using OWA over SSL. This only happens with OWA and usually only when I reply. Example: i 0 z+Ё$͕ ȁձѥqͥѕ´ ѡā%@ɕ M ȁAՉ͡4)! ! ѡ%%L 4(4)]Ё 䁱ЁI ѥѥ4(4) ԁ āȁ ɔ4(4)Qᅹ̰4)44(4($䴴=ɥ5 4(%ɽ)聥! ͽmѼ驥͠ɝt4(%M ɤ 44(%Qm%M ȹɜ͍ ͥ1 t4(%4(%M mͅ tIA ͡4($4($4(4(% ܹ%M͕ ȹɜ4($4($4($ĸЁɕ ѕɥѼɽ ѡɕ 4($ Ёɕ ѕɥѼ ѕЁ ȁݕ͕ 4($̸= ɹ%@Ѽ͕ չѕݕͥѕ̀ ѕѕ٥4(Ĥ4($Ȥ4($иЁɕ ȁ ѥѥ4($4(%)! ͽ4(%5@9Pа\,ɤ9 ɬA 4(% ͕ͅ ȹɜ ͽ4(%Iѡ4($4($=ɥ5 4(%ɽ耉5ɱͽήѥᑽѥํ4(%Q m%M͕ ȹɜ͍ ͥ1 t ퟆ� ̹4(%M Q聡 ͑䰁Ȁ 4(%M mͅ tAՉ͡4($4($4(% ܹ%M͕ ȹɜ4($4($4(%]Ё$ ͥ] ͡ M ȁ ͡4)ȁݕ4(%͕ 4($4(%% ɕ䁅她Ѽٔ䁱´ɽѡͅU ͼ$4)4(%ѥݕ ͡´ѡ݅ 4($4(%Q̰4($4($4(%5ɱͽ4(% ܹѥํ4(%ѥᑽѥํ4($4($4($4(%eԁɔ ɕѱ Չ͍ɥѼѡ´%M͕ ȹɜ͍ ͥ1 4) 4(%͠ɜ4(%Qչ ͍ɥ͕Ѽ4)ٔͅ ݕ ̹4($4($4($4($4(%eԁɔ ɕѱ Չ͍ɥѼѡ´%M͕ ȹɜ͍ ͥ1 4) ѥᑽѥํ4(%Qչ ͍ɥ͕Ѽ4)ٔͅݕ ̹4($4(4(jٲry ! z+ˢrֲڞ ˢ Nʋ rzǧujy 器^j��bݸ:+ 㮛zX( Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None . r� zrmyzrÉ ZZvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: missing UDP packets?
Forget Send/Receive; it doesn't do anything in MAPI. Your router, proxy, or something like that is blocking the UDP packets. ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: missing UDP packets? O so glad to see this. I ahm having the exact same issue. Except I have users using both OLK 98 2K. Is the issue resolved when a user connects on a unclick mail item in Outlook? Does hitting Send/Receive numerous times have no effect? Is this the case for both outbound and inbound mail? -John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Steve Van Eck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:51 AM Subject: missing UDP packets? Recently, the client machines at my WAN sites stopped receiving new mail notifications. I have a sniffer on my exchange box and conducted two packet captures. The first is between exchange and a local machine. Outlook is open when the capture is started, and a new piece of mail is sent to the clients mailbox. The first two packets seen are UDP and sent from Exchange to the client machine, notifying it of the new mail. The second capture is between Exchange and a client on the WAN. Following the same procedure, it appears that no UDP packets are sent to that client machine. Any ideas why the Exchange machine is not sending these packets out? We are using Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 2000. The sites are connected via frame relay. There is no NAT taking place and the routers have no filters set on them. Thanks _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA access problem.
All clients, or just ones on slow links? Do you get Error on page in the lower left-hand corner of the browser some or all of the time? Are you using SSL? Are your browsers configured to not cache encrypted pages? ©2000 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I® Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jonh Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA access problem. I have an Exchange 2000 box sp2 that is having an OWA access problem. All IE clients 5.0 and up (which use Kerberos Authentication) do not get full access to mail folders. When one of these clients connects, two messages pop up stating (an internal server error has occurred). No items in the inbox appear and the (folders button) doesn't work. The only Icon that really works is the Calender, address lists also work. I'm not testing through a firewall and this is not a frontend-backend server situation. Just a lan connection through 1 switch. IE 4.0 and Netscape connect and work normally although it's the pre sp2 look and feel. My pc and server times are synced. Permissions to web shares and folder access appear correct. We do have ISA implemented and I tested ssl to see if the isa server was picking off dhtml and xml transmissions, but the problem still persisted with ssl enabled. The IIS server logs show that Kerberos connections are working. I really can't tell if the problem is Kerberos, permissions, or dhtml/xml being blocked, or something else. Has any one seen this before or does anyone have any Ideas? Your assistance is appreciated! Jon Hussey. Shields Bag Printing Co. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
