ExMap
Dear All, I'm trying to run the ExMap tool (2.0.58) but got this message: Unable to get organizational information from LDAP server. Your user credentials may not allow sufficient access to the directory. The tool is installed on my desktop (NT4 SP6a). I've got MDAC 2.7 and ADSI 2.5 installed. Visio 2000 is installed. TABCTL32.OCX and COMDLG32.OCX are version 6.00.8418. I'm trying to log on (with Exchange service account) to an Exchange 5.5 SP2 server with LDAP listed under protocols. Anybody out there who knows what is going wrong? Should MDAC 2.7 and ADSI 2.5 be running on the server instead of the workstation, or on both? What about the dlls? Thanks in advance, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Odd Q. (Was: Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response) - Solution!
Hi Elizabeth, the above mean't the subject. After many helpful responses from those on this list and a little more research the outcome is that Windows NT Cahallenge Response authenication will not work through a proxy server, therefore we had to go back to basic authentication. Regards, Stephanie. UoG UK. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 November 2001 23:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Odd Q. (Was: Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response) So that would read as: Can anyone provide any help on how to get Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response to work with a proxy server or point.. snip??? H, sorry if I misread it Stephanie, but perhaps you are the person to clear this up? Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response By 'above' I think she meant the Subject -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response Hi Stephanie, The above didn't appeardid u post it as an attachment? I don't think this list allows its members to post those. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Proxy Server Windows NT Challenge/Response Hi all, Can anyone provide any help on how to get the above to work with a proxy server or point me in a direction where I could get some help??!! For some reason I can't get the Network Password box to appear unless I disable the proxy! I may need to submit this to another list...if so can someone let me know of a good one. All help very much appreciated. Thanks in advance. Stephanie UoG UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
It's generally held as bad form to send test messages to a public list. Set up a hotmail/yahoo account and send your test messages there. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 20:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test I guess I fail the test then. Why would you post a test message to public mailing list? -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gears
I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be expected to happen during a migration? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed. When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500 address appearing. Do you know the cause of this? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear by their name. Here is an example. ...OLE_Obj... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will go back to my crack pipe and my cheech and Chong videos.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - BlackBerry Enterprise Server
Our Exchange server sits in a DMZ protected by our PIX firewall. It's a separate network segmented off from our nat'd network(s). Some people think DMZ means a network segment where the hosts are wide open and sometimes I guess it does, but this isn't the case here...only the specific ports needed are available and in/out traffic is strictly restricted. Regarding Win2K pro vs. server, my thoughts were exactly the same before I even spec'd out the hardware, that I would need a server class machine but when I spoke w/RIM prior to purchase they made a point of telling me it could run on Win2K Pro. I think Im going to blow away my BES server and install Win2K Server, reinstall the Blackberry software and see what happens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gears
I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site. The gears that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one site into another. The Corpus site was a dir-rep move. -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be expected to happen during a migration? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed. When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500 address appearing. Do you know the cause of this? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear by their name. Here is an example. ...OLE_Obj... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will go back to my crack pipe and my cheech and Chong videos.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems
Hi ... Here is what we have done ... -run forestprep at the top level of our forest as schema admin, domain admin -run domainprep in the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server as domain admin of the respective domains -establish 2 way trusts between the NT4 domain and the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server -installed EX 2000 in the doamin that will be housing the EX servers -establish CA agreements between the Ex 5.5 containers and the 2000 server that will house their account Everything we have tested works (i.e. creating mailboxes in the 2000, sending/recieving mail, Web access ..) EXCEPT these 3 things . 1) whenever we try to move a mailbox from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server we get an error that says ... An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. Both of which do nothing to resolve the problem 2) IIS admin server has stop errors on the public,exchange, exchange admin folders with a status of The system could not find the path specified ... even though you can browse to the path with IIS admin AND the web access works just fine! 3) If we apply sp2 to our exchange server, the virtual M drive dissappears and several services don't start because they can't find the information stores ... What did we do wrong? Should we go back and start again ? Thanks in advance ... Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gears
I think a detailed explanation of how your sites hang together would make troubleshooting easier. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site. The gears that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one site into another. The Corpus site was a dir-rep move. -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be expected to happen during a migration? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed. When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500 address appearing. Do you know the cause of this? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear by their name. Here is an example. ...OLE_Obj... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will go back to my crack pipe and my cheech and Chong videos.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Gears
They just sit on street corners with some liquor and some fly ladies.. Jus' hanging... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 13:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I think a detailed explanation of how your sites hang together would make troubleshooting easier. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site. The gears that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one site into another. The Corpus site was a dir-rep move. -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be expected to happen during a migration? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed. When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500 address appearing. Do you know the cause of this? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear by their name. Here is an example. ...OLE_Obj... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will go back to my crack pipe and my cheech and Chong videos.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: ExMap
Q284932 -Original Message- From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ExMap Dear All, I'm trying to run the ExMap tool (2.0.58) but got this message: Unable to get organizational information from LDAP server. Your user credentials may not allow sufficient access to the directory. The tool is installed on my desktop (NT4 SP6a). I've got MDAC 2.7 and ADSI 2.5 installed. Visio 2000 is installed. TABCTL32.OCX and COMDLG32.OCX are version 6.00.8418. I'm trying to log on (with Exchange service account) to an Exchange 5.5 SP2 server with LDAP listed under protocols. Anybody out there who knows what is going wrong? Should MDAC 2.7 and ADSI 2.5 be running on the server instead of the workstation, or on both? What about the dll's? Thanks in advance, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Utility to save attachments
Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Maybe this is his test center. Most people would use hotmail/Yahoo this guy likes swynk.com -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test It's generally held as bad form to send test messages to a public list. Set up a hotmail/yahoo account and send your test messages there. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 20:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test I guess I fail the test then. Why would you post a test message to public mailing list? -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems
Interesting... I did the same steps here, and I have issue 2), too. I also can't open the public folder in the system manager under our site (administration -- site -- folder -- public folder). I get the error message www-service not startet. I can open it, when I use the server folder instead (administration -- site -- newserver -- ...). I hoped to get rid of it after removing the old server. We are able to access our mailboxes and public folders via OWA (at least internal . External we still have FireWall issues, but only with public folders. ErrorMessage: -2147467259). to issue 1) We had mapi problems with some of the user's mailboxes. When I tryied to export them with exmerge I found out that the mailboxes had messages with invalid attachments in it. After deleting these messages, it worked fine. All the best Elmer -- Elmer Stöwer CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für Neue Medien mbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems Hi ... Here is what we have done ... -run forestprep at the top level of our forest as schema admin, domain admin -run domainprep in the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server as domain admin of the respective domains -establish 2 way trusts between the NT4 domain and the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server -installed EX 2000 in the doamin that will be housing the EX servers -establish CA agreements between the Ex 5.5 containers and the 2000 server that will house their account Everything we have tested works (i.e. creating mailboxes in the 2000, sending/recieving mail, Web access ..) EXCEPT these 3 things . 1) whenever we try to move a mailbox from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server we get an error that says ... An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. Both of which do nothing to resolve the problem 2) IIS admin server has stop errors on the public,exchange, exchange admin folders with a status of The system could not find the path specified ... even though you can browse to the path with IIS admin AND the web access works just fine! 3) If we apply sp2 to our exchange server, the virtual M drive dissappears and several services don't start because they can't find the information stores ... What did we do wrong? Should we go back and start again ? Thanks in advance ... Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems
Wow! Deja Vu! I just had *exactly* #1 and #2. Here's the fix: 1. Use the AD users and computers tool to move the mailboxes, not the E5.5 admin tool. 2. I stopped and restarted the World Wide Web Publishing service. 3. Ouch! I did not have this happen... Look in the event log and see if EXIFS is loading. If not, try to figure out why. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems Hi ... Here is what we have done ... -run forestprep at the top level of our forest as schema admin, domain admin -run domainprep in the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server as domain admin of the respective domains -establish 2 way trusts between the NT4 domain and the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server -installed EX 2000 in the doamin that will be housing the EX servers -establish CA agreements between the Ex 5.5 containers and the 2000 server that will house their account Everything we have tested works (i.e. creating mailboxes in the 2000, sending/recieving mail, Web access ..) EXCEPT these 3 things . 1) whenever we try to move a mailbox from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server we get an error that says ... An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. Both of which do nothing to resolve the problem 2) IIS admin server has stop errors on the public,exchange, exchange admin folders with a status of The system could not find the path specified ... even though you can browse to the path with IIS admin AND the web access works just fine! 3) If we apply sp2 to our exchange server, the virtual M drive dissappears and several services don't start because they can't find the information stores ... What did we do wrong? Should we go back and start again ? Thanks in advance ... Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gears
Its working so, I think I am going to leave it alone. It appears to be caused from a migration they did in the Bay City site. Thanks for helping me though. -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think a detailed explanation of how your sites hang together would make troubleshooting easier. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site. The gears that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one site into another. The Corpus site was a dir-rep move. -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be expected to happen during a migration? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed. When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500 address appearing. Do you know the cause of this? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear by their name. Here is an example. ...OLE_Obj... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will go back to my crack pipe and my cheech and Chong videos.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Client Connections
Does anyone know what the Q article is describing exactly what causes multiple logons (connections) to the mailbox store? I'm trying to gather as much info about it as possible but cannot seem to locate any good, detailed material. Thanks! John Clark AVP, IS Technology Operations First USA Bank 302.282.1464 ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
Well, good luck with that then! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems
another problem, same issue? I'll get an mapi error, when I try to open the Instances Tab in E5.5 admin -- Site - New Server -- Public Information store properties of the new server. -Original Message- From: Elmer Stöwer Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems 1) That is the only way. 2) did this like twenty times. Problem remains here. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems Wow! Deja Vu! I just had *exactly* #1 and #2. Here's the fix: 1. Use the AD users and computers tool to move the mailboxes, not the E5.5 admin tool. 2. I stopped and restarted the World Wide Web Publishing service. 3. Ouch! I did not have this happen... Look in the event log and see if EXIFS is loading. If not, try to figure out why. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems Hi ... Here is what we have done ... -run forestprep at the top level of our forest as schema admin, domain admin -run domainprep in the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server as domain admin of the respective domains -establish 2 way trusts between the NT4 domain and the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server -installed EX 2000 in the doamin that will be housing the EX servers -establish CA agreements between the Ex 5.5 containers and the 2000 server that will house their account Everything we have tested works (i.e. creating mailboxes in the 2000, sending/recieving mail, Web access ..) EXCEPT these 3 things . 1) whenever we try to move a mailbox from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server we get an error that says ... An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. Both of which do nothing to resolve the problem 2) IIS admin server has stop errors on the public,exchange, exchange admin folders with a status of The system could not find the path specified ... even though you can browse to the path with IIS admin AND the web access works just fine! 3) If we apply sp2 to our exchange server, the virtual M drive dissappears and several services don't start because they can't find the information stores ... What did we do wrong? Should we go back and start again ? Thanks in advance ... Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC - 100% CPU
Install Exchange SP4. Rerun optimizer after installing SP4. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC - 100% CPU Have a problem, when I turn on the IMC when all the services r up, it takes the cpu to 100%, am using nt4 sp6a, exchange 5.5 sp3. Any help is appreciated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
I was looking for a similar product, which someone pointed me to www.c2c.com and it is called Active Folders. It costs some bucks but I think it will do what you want. Hope this helps, Denyse -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Utility to save attachments Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
Can't an email filter program do something like this? I can't imagine that I am the only person in the world with a need for this. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Well, good luck with that then! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
Cool Thanks I will check it out. -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments I was looking for a similar product, which someone pointed me to www.c2c.com and it is called Active Folders. It costs some bucks but I think it will do what you want. Hope this helps, Denyse -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Utility to save attachments Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Again: User showing hash marks in free busy?
That's a good one! Phil, let us know if that was the case. If it was, I need to borrow your crystal ball Kim! I really don't think the cleanfreebusy thing applies because usually you see SOME free/busy stuff, but it's wrong. -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Again: User showing hash marks in free busy? you have the person in your address book or Contacts and the name is resolving to that entry. Simple. Kim Cameron Messaging and Directory Resources SAS Institute Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Again: User showing hash marks in free busy? I have checked and they have their free busy options setup the same as everyone else, but still I can only see hask marks for this person. Phil - Original Message - From: Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 15:47 Subject: User showing has marks in free busy Why do I have users that have has marks when I try and get there free busy info when trying to invite them to a meeting? How do make it so that all users free busy info is displayed. Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Find another vendor (was: Utility to save attachments)
The Boulder Pledge: Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited email message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community. The Boulder Pledge is a simple part of the solution to the spam problem, devised by Roger Ebert (the Thumbs up! guy) at the Conference on World Affairs at the University of Colorado. He announced this pledge in his column in Yahoo! Internet Life's December 1996 issue. http://www.zdnet.com/yil/content/mag/9612/ebert9612.html (Note: this URL no longer works) C2C has harvested my address from this mailing list and spammed it 3 times. Roberta Freese Information Systems Services City of Tallahassee 300 S. Adams St. Tallahassee, FL 32301 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments I was looking for a similar product, which someone pointed me to www.c2c.com and it is called Active Folders. It costs some bucks but I think it will do what you want. Hope this helps, Denyse -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Invitation to Subscribe You're invited to subscribe to Exchange Messaging News. snip Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mr-new.bhi-erc.com with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.071276 secs); 05/02/2002 12:35:25 Received: from c2c.adsl.spfdma.crocker.net (HELO c2c.com) (205.246.6.99) by mr.bhi-erc.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 20:35:25 - From: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange Messaging News Sender: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:19:18 -0500 Reply-To: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit == snip -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? I got one, addressed to the smtp address I use for this list - NOT the address I gave to vendors at MEC... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto Forwarding
Hi I was wondering if anybody could shed any light on an exchange problem I have been experiencing.A client of ours has a remote office and they need the email address to end in [EMAIL PROTECTED] but as we have exchange 5.5 sp4, we have forwarded all their mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it takes a few days for mail to arrive at the remote office and sometimes it does not arrive at all. As the company's business is signage they get alot of graphics files,but we checked with the isp and there is no limit on the account and the same goes for exchange,Any help would be much appreciated. Regards Damian Coughlan Network Support Engineer, DB Computer Solutions Ltd, Limerick Business Complex, Raheen Business Park, Limerick,Ireland. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Hotmail/yahoo = Private/personal mailboxes Swynk exchange list = Public Discussion forum Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 13:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Maybe this is his test center. Most people would use hotmail/Yahoo this guy likes swynk.com -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test It's generally held as bad form to send test messages to a public list. Set up a hotmail/yahoo account and send your test messages there. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 20:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test I guess I fail the test then. Why would you post a test message to public mailing list? -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Again: User showing hash marks in free busy?
Milton has a Crystal ball next to his monitor you might be able to borrow.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Again: User showing hash marks in free busy? That's a good one! Phil, let us know if that was the case. If it was, I need to borrow your crystal ball Kim! I really don't think the cleanfreebusy thing applies because usually you see SOME free/busy stuff, but it's wrong. -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Again: User showing hash marks in free busy? you have the person in your address book or Contacts and the name is resolving to that entry. Simple. Kim Cameron Messaging and Directory Resources SAS Institute Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Again: User showing hash marks in free busy? I have checked and they have their free busy options setup the same as everyone else, but still I can only see hask marks for this person. Phil - Original Message - From: Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 15:47 Subject: User showing has marks in free busy Why do I have users that have has marks when I try and get there free busy info when trying to invite them to a meeting? How do make it so that all users free busy info is displayed. Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Yet another test Alas, I did not study I have failed again Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Maybe this is his test center. Most people would use hotmail/Yahoo this guy likes swynk.com -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test It's generally held as bad form to send test messages to a public list. Set up a hotmail/yahoo account and send your test messages there. -Original Message- From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 20:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test I guess I fail the test then. Why would you post a test message to public mailing list? -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test please ignore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gears
Rollers Rule (or at least they did in the UK in the 70's!) Bring out the tartan trousers! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site. The gears that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one site into another. The Corpus site was a dir-rep move. -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be expected to happen during a migration? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed. When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500 address appearing. Do you know the cause of this? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear by their name. Here is an example. ...OLE_Obj... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will go back to my crack pipe and my cheech and Chong videos.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
haiku friday
review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gears
S! A! T-U-R ! D-A-Y ! NIGHT !! -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Rollers Rule (or at least they did in the UK in the 70's!) Bring out the tartan trousers! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site. The gears that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one site into another. The Corpus site was a dir-rep move. -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be expected to happen during a migration? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed. When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500 address appearing. Do you know the cause of this? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear by their name. Here is an example. ...OLE_Obj... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will go back to my crack pipe and my cheech and Chong videos.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: haiku friday
I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Web Access
I have a user who logs on to OWA from his home and complains that the time zone is incorrect. He has changed the time zone but it will not save the change. The time zone setting for his Outlook client in the office is set correctly. This problem effects his meeting notifications. I've logged into OWA as myself and changed the time zone successfully. Is there any reason why this user can't do the same from home? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
Doesn't veritas offer something like that? Not sure if it's configurable down to the individual mailboxes though - I think it's all or nothing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Well, good luck with that then! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems
I should have stated for #1 we are using the AD users and computers tool ... NOT the 5.5 admin tool (we have read the white papers, Q's etc ) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems Wow! Deja Vu! I just had *exactly* #1 and #2. Here's the fix: 1. Use the AD users and computers tool to move the mailboxes, not the E5.5 admin tool. 2. I stopped and restarted the World Wide Web Publishing service. 3. Ouch! I did not have this happen... Look in the event log and see if EXIFS is loading. If not, try to figure out why. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems Hi ... Here is what we have done ... -run forestprep at the top level of our forest as schema admin, domain admin -run domainprep in the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server as domain admin of the respective domains -establish 2 way trusts between the NT4 domain and the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server -installed EX 2000 in the doamin that will be housing the EX servers -establish CA agreements between the Ex 5.5 containers and the 2000 server that will house their account Everything we have tested works (i.e. creating mailboxes in the 2000, sending/recieving mail, Web access ..) EXCEPT these 3 things . 1) whenever we try to move a mailbox from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server we get an error that says ... An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. Both of which do nothing to resolve the problem 2) IIS admin server has stop errors on the public,exchange, exchange admin folders with a status of The system could not find the path specified ... even though you can browse to the path with IIS admin AND the web access works just fine! 3) If we apply sp2 to our exchange server, the virtual M drive dissappears and several services don't start because they can't find the information stores ... What did we do wrong? Should we go back and start again ? Thanks in advance ... Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange5.5.
Ed's right. Your policy is useless unless you: 1. Ban PST usage in your company with a policy signed by your CEO, CIO etc. 2. Modify your default Outlook setup to not have PST files available as a service. 3. Delete all PST files from your file servers (by delete I mean move to a location where they're inaccessible by ordinary users and you can keep them there for a while in case someone screams) 4. Delete all PST files from desktops. As far as Mailbox Manager goes, it'll run just fine during virus scanning or online maintenance. I would try to avoid running it during backups. If you're going to touch the entire mailbox, you also want to make sure that you run the latest version of mailbox manager. Earlier versions really messed up recurring appointments in calendar folder. I would make sure you don't run it against Tasks, Calendar and Contacts. You also want to add IPM.Contact, IPM.Task and IPM.Appointment as excluded message classes just in case a use created a subfolder that contains contact, task or calendar items. S. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. Just point out that malcontents won't follow the policy and copy their evidence into a PST or print it out, while your policy will have destroyed all evidence in your company's favor. When your company is sued by a malcontent employee, remember that I told you so. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. Thanks for all your input, my manager is going to put this out at the Executive Managers Meeting as well as an email to everyone. I agree with Sent Items and Deleted Items, but they want Inbox as well and then they are going for the rest of the Mailbox.Is there a best time to run this? I've got online Save's starting at 10pm last's to about 2am, online Maint starting at 2am and finish's around 3am, and Antivirus scanning the mailbox's at 3am which lasts until about 7am. john -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. We are going to implement an 12 month email retention policy using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5 (my 9 systems are exch 5.5 sp4 on nt4.0 sp6a with Trend Antivirus), are there any gottcha's or best practices that you are using for this product (i.e best time to run this etc etc). I've tested it on our backup Mailbox Restore server and have read the Users Guide as well as Tony Redmond Tech Note Article from Windows NT Magazine's Exchange Administrator, it seems straight forward but am I missing something. thanks, john _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox
A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Web Access
User error? OWA wouldn't know where the user is located. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Farquharson, Andrea Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Web Access I have a user who logs on to OWA from his home and complains that the time zone is incorrect. He has changed the time zone but it will not save the change. The time zone setting for his Outlook client in the office is set correctly. This problem effects his meeting notifications. I've logged into OWA as myself and changed the time zone successfully. Is there any reason why this user can't do the same from home? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
Okay, it's a lead I will check it out. Denyse, your suggestion was very close. However it will only save the attachment to a public folder. It needs to be removed from the exchange database to an actual file. Thank you. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Doesn't veritas offer something like that? Not sure if it's configurable down to the individual mailboxes though - I think it's all or nothing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Well, good luck with that then! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Auto Forwarding
Could be anything. The first thing you should look at: Internet headers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Damian Coughlan Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Auto Forwarding Hi I was wondering if anybody could shed any light on an exchange problem I have been experiencing.A client of ours has a remote office and they need the email address to end in [EMAIL PROTECTED] but as we have exchange 5.5 sp4, we have forwarded all their mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it takes a few days for mail to arrive at the remote office and sometimes it does not arrive at all. As the company's business is signage they get alot of graphics files,but we checked with the isp and there is no limit on the account and the same goes for exchange,Any help would be much appreciated. Regards Damian Coughlan Network Support Engineer, DB Computer Solutions Ltd, Limerick Business Complex, Raheen Business Park, Limerick,Ireland. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5.
All of your measures Add some weight to policy. None can be enforced. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. Ed's right. Your policy is useless unless you: 1. Ban PST usage in your company with a policy signed by your CEO, CIO etc. 2. Modify your default Outlook setup to not have PST files available as a service. 3. Delete all PST files from your file servers (by delete I mean move to a location where they're inaccessible by ordinary users and you can keep them there for a while in case someone screams) 4. Delete all PST files from desktops. As far as Mailbox Manager goes, it'll run just fine during virus scanning or online maintenance. I would try to avoid running it during backups. If you're going to touch the entire mailbox, you also want to make sure that you run the latest version of mailbox manager. Earlier versions really messed up recurring appointments in calendar folder. I would make sure you don't run it against Tasks, Calendar and Contacts. You also want to add IPM.Contact, IPM.Task and IPM.Appointment as excluded message classes just in case a use created a subfolder that contains contact, task or calendar items. S. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. Just point out that malcontents won't follow the policy and copy their evidence into a PST or print it out, while your policy will have destroyed all evidence in your company's favor. When your company is sued by a malcontent employee, remember that I told you so. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. Thanks for all your input, my manager is going to put this out at the Executive Managers Meeting as well as an email to everyone. I agree with Sent Items and Deleted Items, but they want Inbox as well and then they are going for the rest of the Mailbox.Is there a best time to run this? I've got online Save's starting at 10pm last's to about 2am, online Maint starting at 2am and finish's around 3am, and Antivirus scanning the mailbox's at 3am which lasts until about 7am. john -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. We are going to implement an 12 month email retention policy using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5 (my 9 systems are exch 5.5 sp4 on nt4.0 sp6a with Trend Antivirus), are there any gottcha's or best practices that you are using for this product (i.e best time to run this etc etc). I've tested it on our backup Mailbox Restore server and have read the Users Guide as well as Tony Redmond Tech Note Article from Windows NT Magazine's Exchange Administrator, it seems straight forward but am I missing something. thanks, john _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox
For DLs, you just create the name of the DL and assign the person who requested the DL Ownership. They then add/delete as needed and you don't need to be involved. For something like your request, I would think that a shared mailbox would fit best but of course it all depends on how your users work. I don't much care for public folders because they do get out of hand and there is that bit about the limits don't actually limit anything. -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems
For #3, ensure that the M drive is being shared (net share Public=M:\). See Q258550. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wohlgemuth, Mike Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems I should have stated for #1 we are using the AD users and computers tool ... NOT the 5.5 admin tool (we have read the white papers, Q's etc ) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems Wow! Deja Vu! I just had *exactly* #1 and #2. Here's the fix: 1. Use the AD users and computers tool to move the mailboxes, not the E5.5 admin tool. 2. I stopped and restarted the World Wide Web Publishing service. 3. Ouch! I did not have this happen... Look in the event log and see if EXIFS is loading. If not, try to figure out why. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ex 5.5 -- ex 2000 ... install problems Hi ... Here is what we have done ... -run forestprep at the top level of our forest as schema admin, domain admin -run domainprep in the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server as domain admin of the respective domains -establish 2 way trusts between the NT4 domain and the doamins that will be housing users and the EX 2000 server -installed EX 2000 in the doamin that will be housing the EX servers -establish CA agreements between the Ex 5.5 containers and the 2000 server that will house their account Everything we have tested works (i.e. creating mailboxes in the 2000, sending/recieving mail, Web access ..) EXCEPT these 3 things . 1) whenever we try to move a mailbox from the 5.5 server to the 2000 server we get an error that says ... An internal processing error has occurred. Try restarting the Exchange System Manager or the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service, or both. Both of which do nothing to resolve the problem 2) IIS admin server has stop errors on the public,exchange, exchange admin folders with a status of The system could not find the path specified ... even though you can browse to the path with IIS admin AND the web access works just fine! 3) If we apply sp2 to our exchange server, the virtual M drive dissappears and several services don't start because they can't find the information stores ... What did we do wrong? Should we go back and start again ? Thanks in advance ... Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. mailbox
Both have benefits. Design the best solution With your customers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Web Access
Do the OWA and the local computer time zone properties match at home (should at the office)? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Farquharson, Andrea Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Web Access I have a user who logs on to OWA from his home and complains that the time zone is incorrect. He has changed the time zone but it will not save the change. The time zone setting for his Outlook client in the office is set correctly. This problem effects his meeting notifications. I've logged into OWA as myself and changed the time zone successfully. Is there any reason why this user can't do the same from home? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 admin troubles
Hello all, Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would toss it to the list. This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5 sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a. No trouble with the server.. I have recently migrated to a new workstation. I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc.. I had the admin installed on my old workstation as well. Both workstation installs are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4. Now this is the trouble on the new workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin version on my old workstation. In particular I need to see the permissions tab, but it is missing. I checked my old workstation and the admin was loading with NO command line switches... The installs seem to be the same, what am I doing wrong..? Any ideas.. I hope that I am not being a doofus and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though.. Thanks, ~John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline address book sync
It states that it is using the information store default (which is 3 am correct?) -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 7, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync One would be that offline address book generation is not scheduled to run. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline address book sync Hi there Are there any known reasons for the GAL to not sync with the offline address book? I have a user who is having this issue... (there are like only 2 users within the org that travel with laptops) Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles
Tools/Options/Show Permission page for all objects. Tell it to show roles while you're at it. -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles Hello all, Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would toss it to the list. This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5 sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a. No trouble with the server.. I have recently migrated to a new workstation. I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc.. I had the admin installed on my old workstation as well. Both workstation installs are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4. Now this is the trouble on the new workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin version on my old workstation. In particular I need to see the permissions tab, but it is missing. I checked my old workstation and the admin was loading with NO command line switches... The installs seem to be the same, what am I doing wrong..? Any ideas.. I hope that I am not being a doofus and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though.. Thanks, ~John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles
From the Workstation, open ExAdmin, Tools/Options/Permissions tab. Check the stuff you want. -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles Hello all, Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would toss it to the list. This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5 sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a. No trouble with the server.. I have recently migrated to a new workstation. I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc.. I had the admin installed on my old workstation as well. Both workstation installs are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4. Now this is the trouble on the new workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin version on my old workstation. In particular I need to see the permissions tab, but it is missing. I checked my old workstation and the admin was loading with NO command line switches... The installs seem to be the same, what am I doing wrong..? Any ideas.. I hope that I am not being a doofus and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though.. Thanks, ~John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles
In admin, go to tools-options and check the box that allows you to see permissions on each object. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles Hello all, Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would toss it to the list. This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5 sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a. No trouble with the server.. I have recently migrated to a new workstation. I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc.. I had the admin installed on my old workstation as well. Both workstation installs are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4. Now this is the trouble on the new workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin version on my old workstation. In particular I need to see the permissions tab, but it is missing. I checked my old workstation and the admin was loading with NO command line switches... The installs seem to be the same, what am I doing wrong..? Any ideas.. I hope that I am not being a doofus and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though.. Thanks, ~John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles
Thanks much.. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles Tools/Options/Show Permission page for all objects. Tell it to show roles while you're at it. -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles Hello all, Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would toss it to the list. This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5 sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a. No trouble with the server.. I have recently migrated to a new workstation. I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc.. I had the admin installed on my old workstation as well. Both workstation installs are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4. Now this is the trouble on the new workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin version on my old workstation. In particular I need to see the permissions tab, but it is missing. I checked my old workstation and the admin was loading with NO command line switches... The installs seem to be the same, what am I doing wrong..? Any ideas.. I hope that I am not being a doofus and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though.. Thanks, ~John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles
There's definably an echo in here. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 16:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles In admin, go to tools-options and check the box that allows you to see permissions on each object. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles Hello all, Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would toss it to the list. This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5 sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a. No trouble with the server.. I have recently migrated to a new workstation. I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc.. I had the admin installed on my old workstation as well. Both workstation installs are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4. Now this is the trouble on the new workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin version on my old workstation. In particular I need to see the permissions tab, but it is missing. I checked my old workstation and the admin was loading with NO command line switches... The installs seem to be the same, what am I doing wrong..? Any ideas.. I hope that I am not being a doofus and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though.. Thanks, ~John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
Phil, Please rewrite line 2 Haiku should be five seven five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Find another vendor (was: Utility to save attachments)
Unfortunately the actions of an individual may have harmed c2c's reputation in this instance. I have been assured by my rep at c2c that the guy has been reprimanded. I guess we'll never really know the full story.. -Original Message- From: Freese, Roberta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Find another vendor (was: Utility to save attachments) The Boulder Pledge: Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited email message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community. The Boulder Pledge is a simple part of the solution to the spam problem, devised by Roger Ebert (the Thumbs up! guy) at the Conference on World Affairs at the University of Colorado. He announced this pledge in his column in Yahoo! Internet Life's December 1996 issue. http://www.zdnet.com/yil/content/mag/9612/ebert9612.html (Note: this URL no longer works) C2C has harvested my address from this mailing list and spammed it 3 times. Roberta Freese Information Systems Services City of Tallahassee 300 S. Adams St. Tallahassee, FL 32301 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments I was looking for a similar product, which someone pointed me to www.c2c.com and it is called Active Folders. It costs some bucks but I think it will do what you want. Hope this helps, Denyse -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Invitation to Subscribe You're invited to subscribe to Exchange Messaging News. snip Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mr-new.bhi-erc.com with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.071276 secs); 05/02/2002 12:35:25 Received: from c2c.adsl.spfdma.crocker.net (HELO c2c.com) (205.246.6.99) by mr.bhi-erc.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 20:35:25 - From: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange Messaging News Sender: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:19:18 -0500 Reply-To: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit == snip -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? I got one, addressed to the smtp address I use for this list - NOT the address I gave to vendors at MEC... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This communication is confidential and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not that person you are not permitted to make use of the information and you are requested to notify mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately that you have received it and then destroy the copy in your possession. Commerzbank AG is regulated by the FSA for the conduct of investment business in the UK. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
No, shan't! if there are en-ee more jobs :-) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Phil, Please rewrite line 2 Haiku should be five seven five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
Huh? Are you counting differently than we are? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Phil, Please rewrite line 2 Haiku should be five seven five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles
Tools, Options, PErmissions tab. Turn on the option to show the permissions tab for all objects. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Manager, Network Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin troubles Hello all, Ok this problem is starting to really drive me nuts, so I figured I would toss it to the list. This is the deal, the Exchange server I manage is 5.5 sp4 on winNT 4 sp6a. No trouble with the server.. I have recently migrated to a new workstation. I have the Exchange 5.5 admin installed locally so I don't have to walk into the server room to make changes, etc.. I had the admin installed on my old workstation as well. Both workstation installs are win2k sp2 and the admin was sp4. Now this is the trouble on the new workstation when I open the admin and connect to server it works fine, but when I goto the properties on a mailbox I see LESS tabs than the admin version on my old workstation. In particular I need to see the permissions tab, but it is missing. I checked my old workstation and the admin was loading with NO command line switches... The installs seem to be the same, what am I doing wrong..? Any ideas.. I hope that I am not being a doofus and over looking something stupid, it is Friday though.. Thanks, ~John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
A company car Almost non-existent in The U. S. of A. Congratulations! Audrey Gowen Sr. NT Systems Administrator Department of Safety City and County of Denver -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
If that's true Mr Depp You will have to edit Haiku too As yours doesn't add up Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Phil, Please rewrite line 2 Haiku should be five seven five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
Sorry I am wrong Didn't understand the rules Now clear after help Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 17:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday If that's true Mr Depp You will have to edit Haiku too As yours doesn't add up Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Phil, Please rewrite line 2 Haiku should be five seven five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
http://www.cdolive.com/saveatt.htm has a free server-based Event script to accomplish that on every message arriving in a particular folder. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
thanks for kind words guys sorry no more jobs here now maybe one day though! -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline address book sync
Check the event log, Associated events Around 3 a.m. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync It states that it is using the information store default (which is 3 am correct?) -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 7, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync One would be that offline address book generation is not scheduled to run. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline address book sync Hi there Are there any known reasons for the GAL to not sync with the offline address book? I have a user who is having this issue... (there are like only 2 users within the org that travel with laptops) Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption
Encryption is Rearranging data bits. You really want what? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook e-mail Encryption Hello! Can anyone give me advice on email encryption? I have been reading about Verisign product to secure emails, but I am wondering what other options are there. What kind of things you I should watch out for. What kind of obstacles you ran into to implement. And so on. Server: Exchange 5.5 Client: Outlook 2000 (Mixed with SP1 and SP2) Any advice will be greatly appreciated... Thank you, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
That is just as well. I'd rather have allowance Instead of Metro. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Sorry I am wrong Didn't understand the rules Now clear after help Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 17:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday If that's true Mr Depp You will have to edit Haiku too As yours doesn't add up Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Phil, Please rewrite line 2 Haiku should be five seven five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gears
Let's see who's brain is set to RETRO! John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears S! A! T-U-R ! D-A-Y ! NIGHT !! -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Rollers Rule (or at least they did in the UK in the 70's!) Bring out the tartan trousers! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site. The gears that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one site into another. The Corpus site was a dir-rep move. -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually to each dl and deleting and re-adding the user. Also, can this be expected to happen during a migration? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they need to be fixed. When select modify on the dl and double click the person, I get there x.500 address appearing. Do you know the cause of this? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open the DL in Exchange Admin and look at the member list, some of our members have a gear by their name. Here is an example. ...OLE_Obj... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will go back to my crack pipe and my cheech and Chong videos.. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list gears would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: OWA, SSL REMOTE PASSWORD CHANGE
OK getting somewhere...you have to enter the domainname\username but ONLY for accounts that are forced to change passwords at next login. IIS5.0 is set to look in the correct domain and does not require this when changing the password or during authentication, thus making it a tad confusing for users! esp as we thought we'd do away with the domain just recently only to find this problem! The aexp3.htr file already contains the https line so I thought maybe add some HTML in to tell users to enter domainname\username but am unsure as to which .htr file(s) need to be changed. Any ideas anyone? Thanks. Stephanie. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA, SSL REMOTE PASSWORD CHANGE On your OWA box, locate the file called aexp3.htr. Make a backup copy of it. On the original copy change the http to https on line 38 (in the form action part). S. -Original Message- From: Halliday S (ISELS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA, SSL REMOTE PASSWORD CHANGE Hi, OWA sits on seperate box Win2k. Exhange 5.5 SP4.0. Any ideas? Thanks. Stephanie. -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 02:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA, SSL REMOTE PASSWORD CHANGE More info needed, what OS, Ex 55 or E2K etc. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Halliday S (ISELS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 17:28 pm To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA, SSL REMOTE PASSWORD CHANGE Hi guys! We've implemented SSL on our OWA box to enable remote password change, however, what we've found is that it doesn't work on new NT accounts created which have the Change Password on First Login enabled. Can anyone help? Thanks in advance. Stephanie. UoG UK. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline address book sync
Nothing out of the ordinary. No errors. -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 8, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync Check the event log, Associated events Around 3 a.m. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync It states that it is using the information store default (which is 3 am correct?) -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 7, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync One would be that offline address book generation is not scheduled to run. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline address book sync Hi there Are there any known reasons for the GAL to not sync with the offline address book? I have a user who is having this issue... (there are like only 2 users within the org that travel with laptops) Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
Obviously I am! Phil, I'm sorry for ever doubting you! At 11:03 AM 2/8/2002 -0600, Hunter, Lori wrote: Huh? Are you counting differently than we are? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Phil, Please rewrite line 2 Haiku should be five seven five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authentication dialog after Exch 2K migration
We are planning to upgrade to AD and Exch2K in a week. Our testing so far has been favorable with one pretty significant exception: In our test domain, we have a couple NT4 workstations with Office 2000 SR1 installed via the Custom Installation Wizard (ie, a customized server-based install to the local hard drive), an Exch 5.5 SP4 and an Exch 2K SP2 server in a single site, and an AD DC that used to be an NT4 BDC and was upgraded dcpromo'd. Both Win2K servers run Win2K SP2 without SRP1. NT4 servers and workstations all run SP6a. Outlook on the NT4 boxes successfully connects to mailboxes on the Exch 5.5 server. When those mailboxes are moved to the Exch2K box (right-click on the userid in AD Users Computers on the Exch2K box | Exchange Tasks | Move Mailbox), subsequent attempts on the NT4 workstation to connect to the mailbox generate an authentication dialog asking for a userid, domain and password that does not accept the credentials we type in. This dialog repeats about ten times before Outlook gives up and asks if you want to open using default folders. For example, the Joe User mailbox exists on an Exch 5.5 box. I log into the workstation as JUser and launch Outlook, connecting to Joe User's mailbox. I then shut down the workstation, go to the Exch2K server, move Joe User's mailbox to Exchange 2K, and boot the NT4 box. I again log in as JUser and launch Outlook. I get prompted for a userid, domain and password, into which I retype JUser's credentials. No dice. If I completely reinstall Office from CD, I am able to connect to the mailbox without any trouble. Any thoughts? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox
We use distribution lists for things kinda sorta like that. But they use it for additional things as well which only work on a distribution list basis. Plus, we are a very small company so the GAL is very small. We preface all distribution lists with a particular set of characters so they are all together and then users can slide straight to or past them as required. hth Ronni -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline address book sync
Wow...you are really on a roll today Ed. ;0) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync Check the event log, Associated events Around 3 a.m. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync It states that it is using the information store default (which is 3 am correct?) -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 7, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync One would be that offline address book generation is not scheduled to run. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline address book sync Hi there Are there any known reasons for the GAL to not sync with the offline address book? I have a user who is having this issue... (there are like only 2 users within the org that travel with laptops) Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline address book sync
I meant with your Haiku, of course. Your answers are ALWAYS right on. :0) -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync Wow...you are really on a roll today Ed. ;0) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync Check the event log, Associated events Around 3 a.m. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync It states that it is using the information store default (which is 3 am correct?) -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 7, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Offline address book sync One would be that offline address book generation is not scheduled to run. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline address book sync Hi there Are there any known reasons for the GAL to not sync with the offline address book? I have a user who is having this issue... (there are like only 2 users within the org that travel with laptops) Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
All this haiku stuff It is hard to make sense with Five seven seven -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox
We use PF's (Public Folders) with Alert scripts that notify a selected group of a new entry. (I tweaked a script I found on CDO Live.) This works well because when many persons receive a message via DL, everyone thinks the other guy will take care of it and frequently no one does. It was also a pain to all members trying to track down who did. With PF's the person who takes care of it moves it to a sub folder so that everyone can see it has been dealt with. My 2¢ worth... -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox We use distribution lists for things kinda sorta like that. But they use it for additional things as well which only work on a distribution list basis. Plus, we are a very small company so the GAL is very small. We preface all distribution lists with a particular set of characters so they are all together and then users can slide straight to or past them as required. hth Ronni -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption
First, your users need certificates. You can buy these, or you can roll your own - read up on this. Next, Have each user install their cert on their PC. The recipients' public keys need to be somewhere where outlook can see them. You can set up an Exchange KMS server and essentially put the certs in the E5.5 directory. Or, you can have your users create contacts for each user they want to send encrypted email to and add their public key to the contact. Have Outlook look at contacts BEFORE the GAL to resolve user IDs. This quickly gets ugly when dealing with more than one or two users. And gets really ugly when the contacts info gets out of sync with the directory... If you want to send/receive signed email via SMTP, there is an IMS setting that strips signatures from messages. This will need to be turned off (I can't remember if the default is on or off). Oh, and keep in mind OWA can't handle signed/encrypted email. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook e-mail Encryption Hello! Can anyone give me advice on email encryption? I have been reading about Verisign product to secure emails, but I am wondering what other options are there. What kind of things you I should watch out for. What kind of obstacles you ran into to implement. And so on. Server: Exchange 5.5 Client: Outlook 2000 (Mixed with SP1 and SP2) Any advice will be greatly appreciated... Thank you, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: authentication dialog after Exch 2K migration
The NT domain was upgraded to AD. And when Outlook is installed from CD on the same NT4 workstation, no problems. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: authentication dialog after Exch 2K migration It's a rights issue. Give the user additional mailbox rights. e.i add user from the Nt domain to the AD account. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA and Client Awareness
It may have been overly simplistic to state that OWA is not client aware. While that is true, it is almost certainly a temporary state. There are two issues that should cause it to change, and the both stem from the same source. Exchange and Notes will almost certainly continue to pretty much match each other feature for feature. Previous battles have been over including a scheduling system, a web pump, and so on. Wireless is all the rage this year and probably for the next several. In this fight, being able to claim good support for wireless clients is going to be a big deal, although most publicity will probably center on cellular issues, not WLAN ones. Making it easy to use a cell phone that has PDA capabilities to call one's enterprise messaging service and get a so called transcoded display of your inbox and calendar will come into both products in one form or another. One could map out a couple of different strategies for doing this. OWA and Domino could be extended to do the job, or it could be done in an accessory like Unity and Unified Messenger. Or, if Microsoft and IBM were to build accessory IP/PBX servers as a part of their collaboration server suites, one could see the features being a part of that. I think it should be in OWA and Domino, but that's me. However it works out, better screen display (transcoding) and direct synchronization without having to mess around with that PC Companion stupidity should both happen fairly soon. Final aside, I think the cellular focus is off the mark. Most enterprises will reap a greater ROI on investments that improve services to small mobile clients within their facilities as opposed to roaming knowledge workers. Improving productivity within the enterprise's physical footprint is more frequently tied to actual productivity increases that make their way to the bottom line. I never saw a company reduce it's management ratio due to the fielding of a new IT product. I'm sure it happens, but it is not the 80% opportunity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
I feel real stupid now all know I can not count I am going home At 10:06 AM 2/8/2002 -0800, Blunt, James H (Jim) wrote: Well Dennis, then I guess you need to rewrite yours too. Haiku pentameter is 5-7-5. Yours is 5-8-5. See hyphens below for syllables. ;o) -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Phil, Please re-write line 2 Hai-ku should be five sev-en five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Client Question
I have an Outlook user that is putting his laptop into hibernation mode everyday. When he does this, his secretary realized that when she was entering appointments on his calendar he was not seeing them until after he synchronizes. I am wondering if anyone knows any issue between hibernation mode and outlook. I have the president of the company also complaining that after he comes up from hibernation mode and selects any of his mailbox folders with the exception of the inbox, it says unable to display the folder. If he shuts Outlook and re-opens it, it begins to work again. It's obvious that hibernation is causing the problem however, I do not have an explanation for why. I would like to tell them not to use the feature however, these are high level users. Anyone that can shed some light into the problem would be nice as to why it acts so weird. LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and Client Awareness
I'm gonna go buy me an orange suit and a PDA phone! SamsungSamsungSamsungSamsungSamsungSamsungSamsungSamsungSamsungSamsung. .. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA and Client Awareness It may have been overly simplistic to state that OWA is not client aware. While that is true, it is almost certainly a temporary state. There are two issues that should cause it to change, and the both stem from the same source. Exchange and Notes will almost certainly continue to pretty much match each other feature for feature. Previous battles have been over including a scheduling system, a web pump, and so on. Wireless is all the rage this year and probably for the next several. In this fight, being able to claim good support for wireless clients is going to be a big deal, although most publicity will probably center on cellular issues, not WLAN ones. Making it easy to use a cell phone that has PDA capabilities to call one's enterprise messaging service and get a so called transcoded display of your inbox and calendar will come into both products in one form or another. One could map out a couple of different strategies for doing this. OWA and Domino could be extended to do the job, or it could be done in an accessory like Unity and Unified Messenger. Or, if Microsoft and IBM were to build accessory IP/PBX servers as a part of their collaboration server suites, one could see the features being a part of that. I think it should be in OWA and Domino, but that's me. However it works out, better screen display (transcoding) and direct synchronization without having to mess around with that PC Companion stupidity should both happen fairly soon. Final aside, I think the cellular focus is off the mark. Most enterprises will reap a greater ROI on investments that improve services to small mobile clients within their facilities as opposed to roaming knowledge workers. Improving productivity within the enterprise's physical footprint is more frequently tied to actual productivity increases that make their way to the bottom line. I never saw a company reduce it's management ratio due to the fielding of a new IT product. I'm sure it happens, but it is not the 80% opportunity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption
http://www.entrust.com/products/desktop/email/ I haven't rolled it yet, but it's the Citi standard so I don't have a choice on WHAT I roll, just when. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook e-mail Encryption Hello! Can anyone give me advice on email encryption? I have been reading about Verisign product to secure emails, but I am wondering what other options are there. What kind of things you I should watch out for. What kind of obstacles you ran into to implement. And so on. Server: Exchange 5.5 Client: Outlook 2000 (Mixed with SP1 and SP2) Any advice will be greatly appreciated... Thank you, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distribution List Maintenace
In the past I have used the usrtogrp tool that comes with the E2K resource kit to import users into DL's. The one client I am at changes DL member freqeuntly. usrtogrp adds but does not delete. Is there a tool (free) that does DL members maintenace for E2K. Or am I missing some switch on the usrtogrp tool. _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: haiku friday
We need their mailbox For 12-27, now Without a delay. Restore and restore Oh how I hate to restore But it's all done now. Give me that mailbox! I want to see the contents, For another day. So restore servers All night and all day, all week Just for day 1/8. -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday I feel real stupid now all know I can not count I am going home At 10:06 AM 2/8/2002 -0800, Blunt, James H (Jim) wrote: Well Dennis, then I guess you need to rewrite yours too. Haiku pentameter is 5-7-5. Yours is 5-8-5. See hyphens below for syllables. ;o) -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: haiku friday Phil, Please re-write line 2 Hai-ku should be five sev-en five Your line is one short Denny At 03:21 PM 2/8/2002 +, Randal, Phil wrote: I have to ask you if there are any more jobs with cars where you work Lucky devil! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: haiku friday review yesterday got a company car now plus salary raise :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox
Since I'm already foolish...I'm must ask. Ok so I KB...found Q152433 and Q179573. Q152433 seems like the ticket..but. I don't quite understand how to delete the orphan's the doc seems to indicate one path but then says (which doesn't seem to be explained) ..well ok if orphan does show up then do the Y which is stated here..BUT watch out if you ever want to replicate again. what am I missing. I MS exch Admin to the OLD svr server name (riker) PIS PFR I see the orphan (INFO) on the left. But how do I delete it? the Y method of 152433 seems to read to me that I will never be able to replicate anything ever again thx bill -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox Both have benefits. Design the best solution With your customers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: svr move via App.A - FAQ- RCP error
ooop's sorry guy's grab the wrong thread title on last post Since I'm already foolish...I'm must ask. Ok so I KB...found Q152433 and Q179573. Q152433 seems like the ticket..but. I don't quite understand how to delete the orphan's the doc seems to indicate one path but then says (which doesn't seem to be explained) ..well ok if orphan does show up then do the Y which is stated here..BUT watch out if you ever want to replicate again. what am I missing. I MS exch Admin to the OLD svr server name (riker) PIS PFR I see the orphan (INFO) on the left. But how do I delete it? the Y method of 152433 seems to read to me that I will never be able to replicate anything ever again thx bill -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: svr move via App.A - FAQ- RCP error I don't know if it will. I'd turn it back on and make sure that there are no reasons the new server should be talking to the old. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: svr move via App.A - FAQ- RCP error Q: am get the following in my event log on my New Exch55sp4 svr. . An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 6, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name RIKER [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) . Ive started to shut down the old svr. Only IS, Dir, Sys are still running. so I kind understand why it the old svr is crying about the RPC since the MTA - Old is not running but will this all go away when I finally remove the old server? thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption
We are in the HealthCare so we would have to implement this either we like it or not. It's not mandated right now, but we are in the process of doing research to find out what it takes to secure our email. Thanks, Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption Encryption is Rearranging data bits. You really want what? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook e-mail Encryption Hello! Can anyone give me advice on email encryption? I have been reading about Verisign product to secure emails, but I am wondering what other options are there. What kind of things you I should watch out for. What kind of obstacles you ran into to implement. And so on. Server: Exchange 5.5 Client: Outlook 2000 (Mixed with SP1 and SP2) Any advice will be greatly appreciated... Thank you, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption
We're thinking of not even sending PHI through email just to avoid the hassle of encryption. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption We are in the HealthCare so we would have to implement this either we like it or not. It's not mandated right now, but we are in the process of doing research to find out what it takes to secure our email. Thanks, Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption Encryption is Rearranging data bits. You really want what? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook e-mail Encryption Hello! Can anyone give me advice on email encryption? I have been reading about Verisign product to secure emails, but I am wondering what other options are there. What kind of things you I should watch out for. What kind of obstacles you ran into to implement. And so on. Server: Exchange 5.5 Client: Outlook 2000 (Mixed with SP1 and SP2) Any advice will be greatly appreciated... Thank you, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption
Thank you for your advice! Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook e-mail Encryption First, your users need certificates. You can buy these, or you can roll your own - read up on this. Next, Have each user install their cert on their PC. The recipients' public keys need to be somewhere where outlook can see them. You can set up an Exchange KMS server and essentially put the certs in the E5.5 directory. Or, you can have your users create contacts for each user they want to send encrypted email to and add their public key to the contact. Have Outlook look at contacts BEFORE the GAL to resolve user IDs. This quickly gets ugly when dealing with more than one or two users. And gets really ugly when the contacts info gets out of sync with the directory... If you want to send/receive signed email via SMTP, there is an IMS setting that strips signatures from messages. This will need to be turned off (I can't remember if the default is on or off). Oh, and keep in mind OWA can't handle signed/encrypted email. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook e-mail Encryption Hello! Can anyone give me advice on email encryption? I have been reading about Verisign product to secure emails, but I am wondering what other options are there. What kind of things you I should watch out for. What kind of obstacles you ran into to implement. And so on. Server: Exchange 5.5 Client: Outlook 2000 (Mixed with SP1 and SP2) Any advice will be greatly appreciated... Thank you, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stupid Question
My boss is looking for the definitive answer. I KNOW the answer for XCH 5.5. but in XCH 2K does MS support the use of brick - level backups (ducks quickly) Thanks! I know Ed's EMail signature *should* say it all; I have even passed it along to my boss! Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved. William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid Question
Can it be done? Yes. It is possible to write a backup system that in effect copies off the contents of individual mailboxes one at a time, thus exploding single instance storage into some unfathomable large number that will require Enron accounting to pay for the backup media. Do any shipping backup products support it? I don't know, but would be very surprised if they didn't. Lots of people make procurement decisions on dubious criteria. Tell you boss that there is no such thing a an individual mailbox and that it's all an illusion. There is one big group account. It is called the store. Different users get to see different content based on their permissions. Regular backup is bricked, since it takes a single image of the single mailbox that is the store. Maybe that will cause the lights to come on. -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid Question My boss is looking for the definitive answer. I KNOW the answer for XCH 5.5. but in XCH 2K does MS support the use of brick - level backups (ducks quickly) Thanks! I know Ed's EMail signature *should* say it all; I have even passed it along to my boss! Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved. William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Timeout error
That message is in the event log on my server. The recipient. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid Question
I don't know that Microsoft supports brick-level backup. Add-on products do. The Veritas web site might be a good place to start. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Haaker Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid Question My boss is looking for the definitive answer. I KNOW the answer for XCH 5.5. but in XCH 2K does MS support the use of brick - level backups (ducks quickly) Thanks! I know Ed's EMail signature *should* say it all; I have even passed it along to my boss! Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved. William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox
Isn't there a way to create address book views that separate the distribution lists from the mailboxes in the Address book? We have the same here where they put a zz in the front of DL's and it drives me crazy. Especially since we have so many! -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox We use distribution lists for things kinda sorta like that. But they use it for additional things as well which only work on a distribution list basis. Plus, we are a very small company so the GAL is very small. We preface all distribution lists with a particular set of characters so they are all together and then users can slide straight to or past them as required. hth Ronni -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid Question
Hi there I know that Veritas does do a BLB on E2k - I just spoke with them today. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stupid Question I don't know that Microsoft supports brick-level backup. Add-on products do. The Veritas web site might be a good place to start. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Haaker Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid Question My boss is looking for the definitive answer. I KNOW the answer for XCH 5.5. but in XCH 2K does MS support the use of brick - level backups (ducks quickly) Thanks! I know Ed's EMail signature *should* say it all; I have even passed it along to my boss! Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice; it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved. William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . mailbox
You can put them in separate containers. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox Isn't there a way to create address book views that separate the distribution lists from the mailboxes in the Address book? We have the same here where they put a zz in the front of DL's and it drives me crazy. Especially since we have so many! -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs . m ailbox We use distribution lists for things kinda sorta like that. But they use it for additional things as well which only work on a distribution list basis. Plus, we are a very small company so the GAL is very small. We preface all distribution lists with a particular set of characters so they are all together and then users can slide straight to or past them as required. hth Ronni -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opinions on distribution list vs. public discussion folder vs. m ailbox A user came to me with a request to set up a new GAL Distribution list for the members of a commitee, for the purpose of having a place that other employees can e-mail questions and have them addressed by members of the commitee (it's a CAD Standards commitee, and people have been using the excuse that they don't know who to ask when they have questions about the proper rules). I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to set up a public folder that people could post to, or just have a single mailbox that would be monitored by whomever is interested? Or is a DL the best solution for this? I guess what I am worried about is a flood of people wanting me to create Public distribution lists for every comittee or project. Besides being a bit of a hassle to maintain the proper membership, we only have about 100 real mailboxes in the GAL now, and it might be confusing for people if there are so many distribution lists mixed in there. Just wondering how other people handle this. I know the answer is however management thinks best serves the business needs of the organization, but the boss is going to ask me the best way to set this up. Thanks for any ideas Jim Helfer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Distribution List Maintenace
Check http://www.mailsoftware.co.uk/downloads.html - there are a few apps there that may make your life easier. Missy - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:06 PM Subject: Distribution List Maintenace In the past I have used the usrtogrp tool that comes with the E2K resource kit to import users into DL's. The one client I am at changes DL member freqeuntly. usrtogrp adds but does not delete. Is there a tool (free) that does DL members maintenace for E2K. Or am I missing some switch on the usrtogrp tool. _ Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Connectivity cost
Hi there everyone, I was trying to figure out how much does a typical software company with 50-60 employees pay for Internet Connectivity in terms of : $ per Bandwidth per employee. If there are any surveys conducted in past , please point me to them as well. Thanks for any answers . Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
