from:"authfri...@yahoo.com \[FairfieldLife\]"

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

But not destroyed by the FBI, contrary to what you were implying.

Also, we don't know that Clinton "had her aide" do it. Whoever did it may have
done it on his own initiative after everything on the devices had been
transferred to the one she was currently using. (She only used one BlackBerry
at a time, as you know.)

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, Hillary Clinton had her aide smash two of her
non-government issued Blackberry phones with a hammer. Apparently no records
were kept of these events and nobody knows what happened to the parts.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

As you know--according to what you've read--two devices were destroyed, those
of Clinton aide Cheryl Mills and former aide Heather Samuelson. We don't know
whether records of their destruction were maintained; most likely they were,
since their destruction, as you know, was part of an immunity deal negotiated
by the lawyer for the two aides.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, some of the digital devices used by Clinton,
Abaden and thier staff were destroyed using hammers. How many, nobody seems to
know. Maybe they just took the phones and iPads out back to the alley at night
and smashed them.

Apparently no records of their destruction were maintained. They are just
missing. Go figure.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

As has been pointed out to you, the FBI has not destroyed the Abedin/Weiner
devices.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed.

Can anyone figure this out?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

... why exactly were they sharing devices?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: Mika Brazinski on Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Also the chief White House ethics lawyer from 2005 to 2007: 

 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/opinion/on-clinton-emails-did-the-fbi-director-abuse-his-power.html
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/opinion/on-clinton-emails-did-the-fbi-director-abuse-his-power.html

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Also the chairman of the House "Freedom Caucus" (the very conservative 
Republican caucus), Rep. Jim Jordan: 

 House Freedom Caucus Chair Says Comey Letter 'Probably Not' Appropriate 
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jim-jordan-criticizes-comey-letter-clinton
 
 
 
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jim-jordan-criticizes-comey-letter-clinton
 
 House Freedom Caucus Chair Says Comey Letter 'Probab... 
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jim-jordan-criticizes-comey-letter-clinton
 The chairman of the far-right House Freedom Caucus said Monday that FBI 
Director James Comey was probably wrong to announce the discovery of ne...


 
 View on talkingpointsmemo.com 
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jim-jordan-criticizes-comey-letter-clinton
 Preview by Yahoo 
 



 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 You forgot to mention that all kinds of Republicans have also been calling 
Comey out, including more than 30 former state attorneys general, both 
Republican and Democratic: 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/james-comey-criticism-state-attorneys-general-230536
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/james-comey-criticism-state-attorneys-general-230536

 

 Also former Bush attorney general Alberto Gonzalez:
 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/alberto-gonzalez-clinton-email-fbi-230535 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/alberto-gonzalez-clinton-email-fbi-230535

 

 And former Bush attorney general Michael Mukasey:
 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/michael-mukasey-james-comey-clinton-email-230521
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/michael-mukasey-james-comey-clinton-email-230521

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE 

 

 Brzezinski calls out Democrats for hypocrisy over Comey, Scarborough mocks ... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Right. However, we don't have the email database, now, do we? So we can't 
search through it, can we? 

 You misread something, obviously.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  Like it's not hard to search through an email database for keywords that 
would find emails that expose malfeasance.
 
 On 10/31/2016 01:11 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   No, Weiner wasn't sending emails via Clinton's server.
 
 
 650,000 emails over 10 years would be about 178 per day. We don't know how 
many of those were his and how many were hers, or how many were sent and how 
many received. But Weiner was a congressman, and then ran for mayor of NYC, so 
it's to be expected that a lot of emails would go through his account every 
day. And we have no idea whether any of them were sexts.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone as 
devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive and mailed 
them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when Comey makes the FBI 
transcript of the Weiner interview public after the investigation is completed. 
 
 Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving emails on the 
Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, it's a trove.
 
 It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have to be 
generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade! , right?
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 
 
 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")
 
 
 
 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 
 
 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :
 
 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 
 
 The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
 If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 
 
 I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously 
it's a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling 
you, it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 
 
 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 
 
 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 
 
 In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?

[FairfieldLife] Re: Mika Brazinski on Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Also the chairman of the House "Freedom Caucus" (the very conservative 
Republican caucus), Rep. Jim Jordan: 

 House Freedom Caucus Chair Says Comey Letter 'Probably Not' Appropriate 
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jim-jordan-criticizes-comey-letter-clinton
 
 
 
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jim-jordan-criticizes-comey-letter-clinton
 
 
 House Freedom Caucus Chair Says Comey Letter 'Probab... 
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jim-jordan-criticizes-comey-letter-clinton
 The chairman of the far-right House Freedom Caucus said Monday that FBI 
Director James Comey was probably wrong to announce the discovery of ne...
 
 
 
 View on talkingpointsmemo.com 
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jim-jordan-criticizes-comey-letter-clinton
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 You forgot to mention that all kinds of Republicans have also been calling 
Comey out, including more than 30 former state attorneys general, both 
Republican and Democratic: 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/james-comey-criticism-state-attorneys-general-230536
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/james-comey-criticism-state-attorneys-general-230536

 

 Also former Bush attorney general Alberto Gonzalez:
 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/alberto-gonzalez-clinton-email-fbi-230535 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/alberto-gonzalez-clinton-email-fbi-230535

 

 And former Bush attorney general Michael Mukasey:
 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/michael-mukasey-james-comey-clinton-email-230521
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/michael-mukasey-james-comey-clinton-email-230521

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE 

 

 Brzezinski calls out Democrats for hypocrisy over Comey, Scarborough mocks ... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

No, Weiner wasn't sending emails via Clinton's server.
 

 650,000 emails over 10 years would be about 178 per day. We don't know how 
many of those were his and how many were hers, or how many were sent and how 
many received. But Weiner was a congressman, and then ran for mayor of NYC, so 
it's to be expected that a lot of emails would go through his account every 
day. And we have no idea whether any of them were sexts.
 

 

 

 --In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 So, you don't know how Huma's emails got on Anthony's laptop. Someone as 
devious as Weiner, he's probably made backups on an external drive and mailed 
them to Wikileaks already. We will probably find out when Comey makes the FBI 
transcript of the Weiner interview public after the investigation is completed. 

Until then, all we know is that a perv was sending and receiving emails on the 
Clinton home-brew server. According to what I've read, it's a trove.

It's not likely that Weiner made 650,000 emails himself - you'd have to be 
generating thousands of sexting messages every day for a decade, right?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 

 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

 

 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 

 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's 
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, 
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Apparently no records of their destruction were maintained. They are just
missing. Go figure.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

As has been pointed out to you, the FBI has not destroyed the Abedin/Weiner
devices.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Can anyone figure this out?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

... why exactly were they sharing devices?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: Secret Iran Ransom

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

As you know, she didn't "plead the Fifth." That's a very misleading headline. 

 http://www.snopes.com/loretta-lynch-pleads-fifth-over-iran-payment/ 
http://www.snopes.com/loretta-lynch-pleads-fifth-over-iran-payment/
 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 "Congressional sources have told the Free Beacon that this is another part of 
the effort to hide details about these secret negotiations with Iran from the 
American public."

Congress: Attorney General Lynch ‘Pleads Fifth’ on Secret Iran ‘Ransom’ 
Payments 
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/attorney-general-lynch-pleads-fifth-secret-iran-ransom-payments/
 
 
 
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/attorney-general-lynch-pleads-fifth-secret-iran-ransom-payments/
 
 Congress: Attorney GeneralLynch ‘Pleads Fifth’ ... 
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/attorney-general-lynch-pleads-fifth-secret-iran-ransom-payments/
 Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with an investigation by 
leading members of Congress about the Obama administration's secret effort...


 
 View on freebeacon.com 
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/attorney-general-lynch-pleads-fifth-secret-iran-ransom-payments/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 http://eheadlines.com/ag-loretta-lynch-pleads-the-fifth/

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

So there is no one central computer for the entire country, just as I said. You 
could have made that clear in your initial post, and explained briefly what she 
was talking about, whatever it was.  

 Instead, you referred misleadingly to "the key for the central computer that 
tabulates the votes which allows it to...control the results," implying that 
there was only one such computer that tabulated all the votes cast.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Listen to the interview.  Or watch as it should be up later today on YouTube. 
I'll post the link later. I didn't say for the whole country did I?  Stop 
making things up.
 
 Bev Harris is a serious investigator of election rigging especially using 
voting machines.  
 http://blackboxvoting.org/ http://blackboxvoting.org/
 
 The first video explains what I've said was discussed in the interview.
 
 HBO documentary on her organization.
 http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/ http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/
 
 
 On 10/31/2016 12:05 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Bhairitu, there is no "central computer" that tabulates all the votes across 
the country. There are only state systems (many different types). Common sense 
should tell you that. The popular vote doesn't decide the election, the 
electoral vote system, state by state, does. If this lady is telling you 
otherwise, she's full of it.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 Listen to the interview.  It's not just one state.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:40 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   The central computer for which state?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed in the second 
hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some interesting things to say 
including that a developer found the key for the central computer that 
tabulates the votes which allows it to cap votes and control the results.  
Check it out.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:
 
   It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election cycle.  
The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and ignorant the key 
players in this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the 
"cyber" world is knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks 
while at the same time condemning Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks 
presently.  She, Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend 
workshop in how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.
 
 I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be Bernie-Lite. 
 Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my hopes for real change 
are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.
 
 Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security while the 
marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are grooming them for a 
big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos 
and arrogance.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Bhairitu, there is no "central computer" that tabulates all the votes across 
the country. There are only state systems (many different types). Common sense 
should tell you that. The popular vote doesn't decide the election, the 
electoral vote system, state by state, does. If this lady is telling you 
otherwise, she's full of it. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Listen to the interview.  It's not just one state.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:40 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   The central computer for which state?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed in the second 
hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some interesting things to say 
including that a developer found the key for the central computer that 
tabulates the votes which allows it to cap votes and control the results.  
Check it out.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:
 
   It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election cycle.  
The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and ignorant the key 
players in this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the 
"cyber" world is knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks 
while at the same time condemning Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks 
presently.  She, Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend 
workshop in how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.
 
 I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be Bernie-Lite. 
 Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my hopes for real change 
are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.
 
 Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security while the 
marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are grooming them for a 
big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos 
and arrogance.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

The central computer for which state? 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Bev Harris of Black Box Voting (up in your area) was interviewed in the second 
hour this morning on Infowars.com.  She had some interesting things to say 
including that a developer found the key for the central computer that 
tabulates the votes which allows it to cap votes and control the results.  
Check it out.
 
 On 10/31/2016 11:16 AM, ultrarishi wrote:
 
   It's amazing how much the Internet has become part of this election cycle.  
The biggest take away from this is how ill prepared and ignorant the key 
players in this cluster fuck have been.  Trump is obviously oblivious to the 
"cyber" world is knows jack shit.  Hillary on the one hand benefits from leaks 
while at the same time condemning Snowden in the past and Assange and Wikileaks 
presently.  She, Podesta, Wasserman-Shultz and DNC all need to spend a weekend 
workshop in how to use Lastpass, VPN's and not use gmail, for God's Sake.
 
 I held my nose and voted for Hillary since she's pretending to be Bernie-Lite. 
 Of the 2 candidates she is the least offensive, but my hopes for real change 
are pretty darn low.  She doesn't listen.
 
 Every day I fight with my family and friends about internet security while the 
marvel at all the new IoT devices and phone apps that are grooming them for a 
big rip off.  It must be doubly hard to do this politicians and their big egos 
and arrogance.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Interestingly, this video clip does not include Comey's response to Gowdy.
Somehow I don't think Comey felt that he'd been "destroyed."

(Remember, Gowdy is the chap who became almost hysterical over Clinton's IT
team using BleachBit--a free, open-source app used by many home computer users
to clean up their hard disks--to delete Clinton's old personal emails. Gowdy's
frenzied claims are what inspired Trump to denounce Clinton for "acid-washing"
her emails.)

As I've said before, nobody who hasn't read and absorbed this Politico account
of the FBI's notes and reports on Clinton's email server is qualified to
comment on the situation:

What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email Server
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307

What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email...
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
New documents tell the full, strange story of a technophobic VIP, a sloppy
State Department, and the jerry-rigged computer that held it all together.

View on www.politico.com
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307

Preview by Yahoo

It's a complicated story; but the more you know about it, the less it looks
like anything even remotely criminal. It's easy, though, to make it *sound*
criminal when the details are omitted and facts are twisted, ignorantly or (as
with Gowdy) otherwise.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI found no indications of
any intent to withhold those emails.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmHgOn5KJI4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmHgOn5KJI4

►Trey Gowdy Destroys FBI’s James Comey over Hillary Clinton’s ‘Intent’
#HillaryClinton#DonaldTrump# https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmHgOn5KJI4

From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were
on Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she
wouldn't know which emails they were.

(BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.

Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection
with Clinton's server.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI,
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to
Hillary's home-brew server.

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right?

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you,
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails.

The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.

So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important,
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI?

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?

[FairfieldLife] Re: Mika Brazinski on Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

You forgot to mention that all kinds of Republicans have also been calling 
Comey out, including more than 30 former state attorneys general, both 
Republican and Democratic: 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/james-comey-criticism-state-attorneys-general-230536
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/james-comey-criticism-state-attorneys-general-230536

 

 Also former Bush attorney general Alberto Gonzalez:
 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/alberto-gonzalez-clinton-email-fbi-230535 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/alberto-gonzalez-clinton-email-fbi-230535

 

 And former Bush attorney general Michael Mukasey:
 

 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/michael-mukasey-james-comey-clinton-email-230521
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/michael-mukasey-james-comey-clinton-email-230521

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE 

 

 Brzezinski calls out Democrats for hypocrisy over Comey, Scarborough mocks ... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXoOICsbLCE

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

As has been pointed out to you, the FBI has not destroyed the Abedin/Weiner 
devices. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70 https://youtu.be/pD2xBXm4y70
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

As you know, Abedin has been explicit that she didn't know the emails were on 
Weiner's laptop and has no idea how they got there, so obviously she wouldn't 
know which emails they were. 

 (BTW, it's Weiner, not "Wiener.")

 

 It's not clear at this point how many, if any, of the emails on Weiner's 
laptop came from Clinton's server. Newspapers have been reporting that several 
thousand did, but we don't know anything for sure at this point. Highly 
unlikely that all 650,000 did. It appears that this count included Weiner's own 
emails, not just Abedin's, going back quite a few years.
 

 Also *very* highly unlikely anybody is going to do any jail time in connection 
with Clinton's server. As you know, Comey has been quite clear that the FBI 
found no indications of any intent to withhold those emails.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Huma Abedin told the FBI that she gave all her emails and devices to the FBI, 
so the emails on Wiener's computer are probably duplicates of mail she sent to 
Hillary's home-brew server. 

The question is, why didn't she tell the FBI that there were 650,000 emails on 
Wiener's laptop?
If there are any emails that contain State Dept. confidential or top secret 
information, both Abedin and Anthony may do some jail time, right? 

I would like to be there when Donald Trump says: "You're fired!" Obviously it's 
a conspiracy to withhold information in an FBI investigation. I'm telling you, 
it's a Potemkin village all the way down.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Oh, forgot to add: 

 Note to Doug, per your recent diktat: I'm making this post because I believe 
attempts to mislead and deceive, such as in the post I'm responding to, are 
spiritually harmful, not just to the people who read them but also to the 
person who posts them. We would all be much better off spiritually if we 
refrained from making such attempts and instead did our best to stick to the 
truth. 
 (Doug will soon delete this post, as he has deleted several others of my 
recent posts that, for the reasons stated above, corrected false and/or 
misleading information.) 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :
 
 The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-31 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

The DNC doesn't have the emails; Clinton doesn't have the emails; her campaign 
doesn't have the emails; Abedin doesn't have the emails. 

 The FBI has the emails. They're the only ones who can release the emails.
 

 So as you know, what you're suggesting makes no sense.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The DNC attack on Comey smacks of desperation. If the emails are important, 
why not just release them - why do they have to come from the FBI? 

In order to be transparent, you've got to be transparent, right?

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

As I said in another post:

Nobody here who hasn't carefully read this Politico story (long and detailed)
about the FBI interview notes and reports on its investigation into Clinton's
server is qualified to comment on the Clinton email situation:

What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email Server
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307

View on www.politico.com
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
Preview by Yahoo

(Note to Doug, per your recent diktat: I'm making this post because I believe
attempts to mislead and deceive, such as in the post I'm responding to, are
spiritually harmful, not just to the people who read them but also to the
person who posts them. We would all be much better off spiritually if we
refrained from making such attempts and instead did our best to stick to the
truth.)

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

No, I cannot explain how anyone would think they could get away with deleting
33,000 emails and then wiping their hard drive clean and using hammers to
destroy phones - WITH THE FBI BREATHING DOWN YOUR NECK.

I can't explain how anyone could be so dumb as to think they could get away
with something like that, when everyone knows you're not supposed to destroy
any evidence in a federal investigation that now includes a sexting scandal.

Can you explain it to me? Thanks.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

And how do you explain the ACID-WASHED emails? Someone, according to trump,
acid-washed each one, then after they dried, destroyed them. His understanding
of tech is...unusual.

Not only is he morally bankrupt, but a blithering idiot on just about any
topic, and yet, according to his followers, he is the messiah. The one who
cannot successfully tie his shoelaces, will lead them to the promised land.

Seriously?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on
several others.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

"According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your
sources.

And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to
your sources.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

And your sources for this claim are what, now?

I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the
Hillary Clinton email scandal.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Can anyone figure this out?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

... why exactly were they sharing devices?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

As you know, the sentence in red is the only one that's factual in the
paragraph from your post below. The others are either nonfactual or misleading.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

So, Hillary used a cloth to wipe her home-brew mail server; her staff used
BlechBit on her HD; the FBI destroyed two laptops, after giving immunity; and
the DNC staffers used hammers to destroy dozens of phones - but you're thinking
that none of the phones or servers or laptops had any of Huma's email on them?
Go figure.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

As you know, this wasn't done by the FBI, nor was it done to Abedin's and
Weiner's devices...

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on
several others.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

"According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your
sources.

And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to
your sources.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

And your sources for this claim are what, now?

I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the
Hillary Clinton email scandal.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Can anyone figure this out?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

... why exactly were they sharing devices?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

As you know, this wasn't done by the FBI, nor was it done to Abedin's and
Weiner's devices, so it's a complete non sequitur.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, BleachBit was used on one device and a hammer on
several others.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

"According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your
sources.

And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to
your sources.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

And your sources for this claim are what, now?

I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the
Hillary Clinton email scandal.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Can anyone figure this out?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

... why exactly were they sharing devices?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Mon 17-Oct-16 00:15:07 UTC

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Anyone who wants to discuss politics free of the requirement to draw spurious 
connections to spirituality, come on over to FFL2. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 Notice of an Embargo, something of a road closure.. 

   

 We are upon 9 days now to the US election. It is certainly time with all that 
is spiritual going on otherwise to reel this place back in some and put an 
embargo on mundane political bickering that has become exclusive of any 
spiritual commentary. This is expected of us as a topical (spiritual) 
Yahoo-group and certainly there are lots of other places for mundane partisan 
bickering on the internet.  

 Notice and Fair Warning: Until the election day in the USA passes a heavy hand 
of moderation is going to fall over mundane political postings that come on to 
FFL as an embargo.
  
 There are any number of capable writers posting to FFL. Those who have 
spiritual observation to offer can easily continue to offer their 
considerations on FairfieldLife, a Yahoo-group community.  
 -JaiGuruYou   
 

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Fairfield Life Post Counter
 ===
 Start Date (UTC): 10/15/16 00:00:00
 End Date (UTC): 10/22/16 00:00:00
 109 messages as of (UTC) 10/16/16 23:12:36
 
 26 authfriend
 22 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569
 13 emily.mae50
 11 awoelflebater
 10 Bhairitu noozguru
 5 jr_esq
 5 hepa7
 4 feste37 
 4 dhamiltony2k5
 3 olliesedwuz
 2 Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa
 1 j_alexander_stanley
 1 email4you mikemail4you
 1 Dick Mays dickmays
 1 Archer Angel archonangel
 Posters: 15
 Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
 =
 Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
 US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
 Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
 Standard Time (Winter):
 US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
 Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
 For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 She may win the election, but probably not by a landslide, as you claim. The 
question is, how long will she be in office before she gets an indictment. 
Others have been prosecuted and found guilty of much less.
 

 This (in red) is incorrect, as you know. James Comey was very clear on that in 
his July press conference about the investigation.
 

 

 

 Laws are for the little people, right?

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Sure. HRC will win the election in a landslide in a little over a week. The 
rest is noise. You're welcome.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

"What connection Huma had to Wiener and his sexting"--she's his wife, or was; 
she's divorcing him because of the sexting. 

 No "corruption" has been found with regard to Clinton's emails. Technical 
incompetence, yes, but that hasn't been only among "DNC staffers." It was 
throughout the State Department and has been for some time, since well before 
Clinton became secretary of state.
 

 Nobody here who hasn't carefully read this Politico story (long and detailed) 
about the FBI interview notes and reports on its investigation into Clinton's 
server is qualified to comment on the Clinton email situation:
 

 What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email Server 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 
 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 
 What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email... 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 New documents tell the full, strange story of a technophobic VIP, a sloppy 
State Department, and the jerry-rigged computer that held it all together.
 
 
 
 View on www.politico.com 
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-emails-2016-server-state-department-fbi-214307
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Former Secretary of State’s Top IT Official Pleads 5th Amendment More Than 90 
Times 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 
 
 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 
 Former Secretary of State’s Top IT Official Pleads 5th A... 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 (CNSNews.com) – The former top IT official to then-Secretary of State Hillary 
Clinton, pleaded the 5th Amendment against self-incrimination – 90 times -- 
in...


 
 View on www.cnsnews.com 
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/former-secretary-states-top-it-official-pleads-5th-amendment-more-90
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It's all about sexting, scandals, corruption, and emails, not to mention 
incompetence. 

So, what we need to know now is what connection Huma had to Wiener and his 
sexting. And, why exactly were they sharing devices? 

Obviously, there is a lot of ignorance about IT and mail servers among the DNC 
party staffers. They don't seem to understand even the basics of secure online 
communications and record-keeping. All of their mail has been apparently 
hacked. 

We are in the best of hands!  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

Re: [FairfieldLife] Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

One big reason why I said the "news dump" meme doesn't apply to the Comey email
story:

The strange turn in the race found vivid expression on the Sunday news
programs, where surrogates for Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump abandoned their usual
messages and battled instead over Mr. Comey’s conduct and his personal
credibility — with only scant insight into the substance behind his
announcement.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/31/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-james-comey.html

Comey knew this would be such a big story that the usual Friday "news dump"
notion that nobody would be paying attention wouldn't apply, so his priority
was to get it out as soon as possible to inflict maximum damage on the Clinton
campaign.

There are currently four reports on the Comey email story, including the lead
article, on the NYTimes.com front page.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Bhairitu, you should avoid using the word "obviously" when you really don't
know what you're talking about. In this case, you're stuck in standard patterns
and unable to adjust your perspective to get a handle on novel situations.

Yes, of course I know about news dumps taking place on Friday in the hope that
they'll attract less attention from the media and the public.

This was an exception in two ways, as I explained and you ignored. Comey
wanted to get the information out ASAP (it was leaked, but he knew it would be
leaked immediately after he sent the letter to the GOP leaders). He couldn't
have done it sooner than Friday because he himself only got the information on
Thursday. He didn't want to do it later because he wanted it out in time for
the Sunday talk shows. Had nothing to do with a traditional Friday news dump.
You didn't know about Comey getting the information himself only the day before
because you didn't bother to pay attention to the details; you were more
interested in sounding knowledgeable and being able to tell readers something
you (mistakenly) assumed they didn't know.

The second way it was an exception is that even when released on a Friday, a
piece of really sensational news will get massive attention from the media, as
this did. The media had been thirsting for an "October surprise" that would
turn the election back into a horse race, and this beautifully filled the bill.
They didn't care that it was a Friday; they went all-out. And you can see from
the flood of comments from officials and political figures that they picked up
on it right away, Friday or no Friday.

Actually, there's a third reason this was an exception: This close to an
election, folks are paying much closer attention to the news no matter when it
comes out. And this will still be hot when Monday comes around, so it won't be
neglected at the water cooler.

Comey's not a fool. He was well aware of what would happen, and he knew the
fact that it was Friday wouldn't make enough difference to matter.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

On 10/29/2016 01:17 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]
wrote:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

(snip)

Of course it didn't miss my attention that the new Comey stuff came out
yesterday, a Friday. Always known that when bad news is to be released do it on
a Friday as the "great unwashed" won't be paying attention.

Actually, any of the "great unwashed" who watched television, listened to the
radio, or read a newspaper or a Web site on Friday would have found out about
Comey's ratf**k, because it made headlines everywhere.

And if Bhairitu had been paying attention, he'd know that Comey didn't find
out about the emails until he was briefed on Thursday--hence the announcement
the very next day. Comey wanted to get the news out as soon as possible so it
would have the maximum negative effect on Clinton's campaign--including, of
course, dominating all the Sunday talk shows ("Meet the Press," etc.).

Obviously Judy doesn't know that political analysts and journalists will tell
you that news released on Friday doesn't get discussed like it does earlier in
the week. That's why news that might stir controversy is often released on
Friday. And no, Judy, the public doesn't always tune into the news on Friday
like they do earlier in the week. Nor will they have a chance for a water
cooler discussion. Try living on earth for a change.

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

"According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of a
claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your
sources.

And now that you've done so, indeed we find that it wasn't Abedin's and
Weiner's devices that were destroyed, contrary to what you implied.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

All you have is what you've read, since you weren't there at the time.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth
of a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to
your sources.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

And your sources for this claim are what, now?

I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the
Hillary Clinton email scandal.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Can anyone figure this out?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

... why exactly were they sharing devices?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

But not the devices of Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner, contrary to what you
implied. Thank you for correcting yourself.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

"...the destruction of the laptops is particularly troubling as it means that
the computers could not be used as evidence in future legal proceedings, should
new information or circumstances arise."

FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immunity deal, lawmaker
says
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html

FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immu...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
Immunity deals for two top Hillary Clinton aides included a side arrangement
obliging the FBI to destroy their laptops after reviewing the devices, House
Judic...

View on www.foxnews.com
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
Preview by Yahoo

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

And your sources for this claim are what, now?

I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the
Hillary Clinton email scandal.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Can anyone figure this out?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

... why exactly were they sharing devices?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

P.S.: "According to what I've read" is not sufficient to establish the truth of 
a claim. (Especially one of your claims.) You need to provide citations to your 
sources. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

And your sources for this claim are what, now? 

 I think you're either making this up, or you misunderstood something you read.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 According to what I've read, the FBI has destroyed some devices used in the 
Hillary Clinton email scandal.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: On the More Serious Side - Comey

2016-10-30 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Yes. The FBI didn't destroy the devices or the evidence. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The question is, why were the devices killed by the FBI. Obviously nobody can 
get any data from a computer that has been wrecked. Apparently the FBI has made 
a very grave mistake and now the evidence has been destroyed. 

Can anyone figure this out?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ... why exactly were they sharing devices?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/james-comey-broke-with-loretta-lynch-and-justice-department-tradition

[FairfieldLife] Re: Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Yes, that's what Bhairitu and I were discussing. My point was that the 
new-emails story was not your traditional news dump, for several reasons that I 
explained to Bhairitu at some length. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Releasing a political story on a Friday is known as a news dump.

Sorking wrote an episode of the West Wing about how this was a strategy to hide 
big stories by releasing them at a time when folks are concerned with movies 
and ball games or that it gets buried in a deluge of many stories.

Take Out the Trash Day http://westwing.wikia.com/wiki/Take_Out_the_Trash_Day 
 
 http://westwing.wikia.com/wiki/Take_Out_the_Trash_Day
 
 Take Out the Trash Day http://westwing.wikia.com/wiki/Take_Out_the_Trash_Day 
"Previously on the West Wing" spoken by Sam "Take out the Trash Day" is the 
thirteenth episode of the first season of the West Wing.


 
 View on westwing.wikia.com 
http://westwing.wikia.com/wiki/Take_Out_the_Trash_Day
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Translation: "How embarrassing that an 'amateur' analysis shows how far off I 
was, despite all those professional political pundits I read and listen to..." 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 You sure waste a lot of time on this.  Don't you have anything better to do in 
your life?  I read and listen to many professional political pundits during the 
week so I don't need to read any amateur stuff.
 
 On 10/29/2016 04:54 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Bhairitu, you should avoid using the word "obviously" when you really don't 
know what you're talking about. In this case, you're stuck in standard patterns 
and unable to adjust your perspective to get a handle on novel situations.
 
 
 Yes, of course I know about news dumps taking place on Friday in the hope that 
they'll attract less attention from the media and the public.
 
 
 This was an exception in two ways, as I explained and you ignored. Comey 
wanted to get the information out ASAP (it was leaked, but he knew it would be 
leaked immediately after he sent the letter to the GOP leaders). He couldn't 
have done it sooner than Friday because he himself only got the information on 
Thursday. He didn't want to do it later because he wanted it out in time for 
the Sunday talk shows. Had nothing to do with a traditional Friday news dump. 
You didn't know about Comey getting the information himself only the day before 
because you didn't bother to pay attention to the details; you were more 
interested in sounding knowledgeable and being able to tell readers something 
you (mistakenly) assumed they didn't know.
 
 
 The second way it was an exception is that even when released on a Friday, a 
piece of really sensational news will get massive attention from the media, as 
this did. The media had been thirsting for an "October surprise" that would 
turn the election back int! o a horse race, and this beautifully filled the 
bill. They didn't care that it was a Friday; they went all-out. And you can see 
from the flood of comments from officials and political figures that they 
picked up on it right away, Friday or no Friday.
 
 
 Actually, there's a third reason this was an exception: This close to an 
election, folks are paying much closer attention to the news no matter when it 
comes out. And this will still be hot when Monday comes around, so it won't be 
neglected at the water cooler.
 
 
 Comey's not a fool. He was well aware of what would happen, and he knew the 
fact that it was Friday wouldn't make enough difference to matter.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 On 10/29/2016 01:17 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 (snip)
 
 Of course it didn't miss my attention that the new Comey stuff came out 
yesterday, a Friday. Always known that when bad news is to be released do it on 
a Friday as the "great unwashed" won't be paying attention.
 

 Actually, any of the "great unwashed" who watched television, listened to the 
radio, or read a newspaper or a Web site on Friday would have found out about 
Comey's ratf**k, because it made headlines everywhere.
 
 
 And if Bhairitu had been paying attention, he'd know that Comey didn't find 
out about the emails until he was briefed on Thursday--hence the announcement 
the very next day. Comey wanted to get the news out as soon as possible so it 
would have the maximum negative effect on Clinton's campaign--including, of 
course, dominating all the Sunday talk shows ("Meet the Press," etc.).
 




 
 Obviously Judy doesn't know that political analysts and journalists will tell 
you that news released on Friday doesn't get discussed like it does earlier in 
the week.  That's why news that might stir controversy is often released on 
Friday.  And no, Judy, the public doesn't always tune into the news on Friday 
like they do earlier in the week.  Nor will they have a chance for a water 
cooler discussion.  Try living on earth for a change.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Bhairitu, you should avoid using the word "obviously" when you really don't 
know what you're talking about. In this case, you're stuck in standard patterns 
and unable to adjust your perspective to get a handle on novel situations. 

 Yes, of course I know about news dumps taking place on Friday in the hope that 
they'll attract less attention from the media and the public.
 

 This was an exception in two ways, as I explained and you ignored. Comey 
wanted to get the information out ASAP (it was leaked, but he knew it would be 
leaked immediately after he sent the letter to the GOP leaders). He couldn't 
have done it sooner than Friday because he himself only got the information on 
Thursday. He didn't want to do it later because he wanted it out in time for 
the Sunday talk shows. Had nothing to do with a traditional Friday news dump. 
You didn't know about Comey getting the information himself only the day before 
because you didn't bother to pay attention to the details; you were more 
interested in sounding knowledgeable and being able to tell readers something 
you (mistakenly) assumed they didn't know.
 

 The second way it was an exception is that even when released on a Friday, a 
piece of really sensational news will get massive attention from the media, as 
this did. The media had been thirsting for an "October surprise" that would 
turn the election back into a horse race, and this beautifully filled the bill. 
They didn't care that it was a Friday; they went all-out. And you can see from 
the flood of comments from officials and political figures that they picked up 
on it right away, Friday or no Friday.
 

 Actually, there's a third reason this was an exception: This close to an 
election, folks are paying much closer attention to the news no matter when it 
comes out. And this will still be hot when Monday comes around, so it won't be 
neglected at the water cooler.
 

 Comey's not a fool. He was well aware of what would happen, and he knew the 
fact that it was Friday wouldn't make enough difference to matter.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 On 10/29/2016 01:17 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 (snip)
 
 Of course it didn't miss my attention that the new Comey stuff came out 
yesterday, a Friday. Always known that when bad news is to be released do it on 
a Friday as the "great unwashed" won't be paying attention.
 

 Actually, any of the "great unwashed" who watched television, listened to the 
radio, or read a newspaper or a Web site on Friday would have found out about 
Comey's ratf**k, because it made headlines everywhere.
 
 
 And if Bhairitu had been paying attention, he'd know that Comey didn't find 
out about the emails until he was briefed on Thursday--hence the announcement 
the very next day. Comey wanted to get the news out as soon as possible so it 
would have the maximum negative effect on Clinton's campaign--including, of 
course, dominating all the Sunday talk shows ("Meet the Press," etc.).
 




 
 Obviously Judy doesn't know that political analysts and journalists will tell 
you that news released on Friday doesn't get discussed like it does earlier in 
the week.  That's why news that might stir controversy is often released on 
Friday.  And no, Judy, the public doesn't always tune into the news on Friday 
like they do earlier in the week.  Nor will they have a chance for a water 
cooler discussion.  Try living on earth for a change.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 (snip)
 
 Of course it didn't miss my attention that the new Comey stuff came out 
yesterday, a Friday. Always known that when bad news is to be released do it on 
a Friday as the "great unwashed" won't be paying attention.
 

 Actually, any of the "great unwashed" who watched television, listened to the 
radio, or read a newspaper or a Web site on Friday would have found out about 
Comey's ratf**k, because it made headlines everywhere.
 

 And if Bhairitu had been paying attention, he'd know that Comey didn't find 
out about the emails until he was briefed on Thursday--hence the announcement 
the very next day. Comey wanted to get the news out as soon as possible so it 
would have the maximum negative effect on Clinton's campaign--including, of 
course, dominating all the Sunday talk shows ("Meet the Press," etc.).

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

You ain't no competition, sweetie, believe me. 

 (Unbelievable. He's still holding on to his "alt right" mistake. And 
pretending he hasn't been pushing the notion that Trump will win the election.)
 

 And yes, I've listened to/watched/read quite a bit of alternative media--more 
than enough to know most of it is crackpot.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Remember, folks, Judy is the knowledgeable, objective political expert who 
wants you to look to her as your expert expert in political affairs.  She 
doesn't like any competition here.
 
 On 10/29/2016 10:47 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Remember, folks, Bhairitu is the knowledgeable, objective political expert 
who insists *to this day*--in the face of hard, unimpeachable evidence to the 
contrary--that Clinton invented the term "alt right" and that it refers to 
"alternative media" rather than a fringe political movement.

 
 Wow! What a trivial thing to bring up.  I would even suppose that if you dig 
around enough someone maybe in the 19th century might have used the term "alt 
right".  The "alternative media" is the term used by the non-mainsteam media. 
Alt-Right sounds like a keyboard command.
 
 I bet you have not listened to one minute of the alternative media.  You are 
probably afraid they will turn you into a turnip.
 
 
 
 Clearly, we should take his opinion about who will win the election with the 
utmost seriousness.
 
 



 
 My opinion was stated the other day in a post: 
 "we will know on November 9th".  Please try to keep up.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 The stuff you're smoking will soon become legal in California. :-D
 
 Not that I'm any Trump fan.
 On 10/29/2016 07:17 AM, olliesedwuz@... mailto:olliesedwuz@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   It is genuinely hard for me to believe that there are people out there who 
think trump is going to win. Astonishing. Pissing into the wind.

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 Just to reiterate: The FBI doesn't yet know what's in the emails. They have to 
get a court order before they can read them. It's entirely possible that some 
or all of the emails are duplicates of those already in the FBI's possession 
from other sources. 
 
 When the Clinton haters--Trump and his minions and Republicans like Ryan and 
Chaffetz--claim the FBI must have found sensational emails proving Clinton's 
guilt or they wouldn't have made this announcement so close to the election, 
they are not telling the truth.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:olliesedwuz@... wrote :

 
 as usual, it is a yawn - HRC says get it all out in the open. Why should she 
care? She doesn't hide her taxes, or suggest grabbing someone's genitals. 
Compared to that orange sex offender and tax cheat, she comes across like a 
saint. 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Looks like the fit is hitting the shan!
 October surprise

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Remember, folks, Bhairitu is the knowledgeable, objective political expert who 
insists *to this day*--in the face of hard, unimpeachable evidence to the 
contrary--that Clinton invented the term "alt right" and that it refers to 
"alternative media" rather than a fringe political movement. 

 Clearly, we should take his opinion about who will win the election with the 
utmost seriousness.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 The stuff you're smoking will soon become legal in California. :-D
 
 Not that I'm any Trump fan.
 On 10/29/2016 07:17 AM, olliesedwuz@... mailto:olliesedwuz@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   It is genuinely hard for me to believe that there are people out there who 
think trump is going to win. Astonishing. Pissing into the wind.

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 
 Just to reiterate: The FBI doesn't yet know what's in the emails. They have to 
get a court order before they can read them. It's entirely possible that some 
or all of the emails are duplicates of those already in the FBI's possession 
from other sources. 
 
 When the Clinton haters--Trump and his minions and Republicans like Ryan and 
Chaffetz--claim the FBI must have found sensational emails proving Clinton's 
guilt or they wouldn't have made this announcement so close to the election, 
they are not telling the truth.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:olliesedwuz@... wrote :

 
 as usual, it is a yawn - HRC says get it all out in the open. Why should she 
care? She doesn't hide her taxes, or suggest grabbing someone's genitals. 
Compared to that orange sex offender and tax cheat, she comes across like a 
saint. 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Looks like the fit is hitting the shan!
 October surprise

[FairfieldLife] Re: Bill Maher

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Again FWIW, Maher gets a couple of facts wrong. The Abedin and Weiner emails
weren't "intermingled"; they were in separate accounts on the same laptop.
(Abedin's emails were just a backup.) And as I just noted in another post,
apparently none of them are Clinton's emails.

Still funny...!

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Perfect. I love this guy.

So, during Friday’s edition of HBO’s Real Time, host Bill Maher
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/14/bill-maher-uncut-roger-ailes-absolutely-looks-like-a-pig-to-me.html
gave his unique take on the latest development in Hillary’s Emailgate.

“I think it is rather appropriate that this election is so close to Halloween,
because what happens in every scary movie? You think you killed the monster—you
killed him ten times—and then a tiny, orange hand comes out of the grave.
Believe me: for Hillary, tonight was Nightmare on Email Street,” he quipped
during his monologue.

Maher then gave some background on how the hell Anthony Weiner (alias: Carlos
Danger), a frequent panelist on his Real Time program, could be playing such a
consequential role in this election.

“Anthony Weiner is under investigation for sexting with a underage girl across
state lines, so the FBI seized all his computers. He is married—or was
married—to Huma Abedin, who is Hillary Clinton’s aide, and they were using the
same computer,” said Maher. “Which begs my first question: Why is Huma using
Anthony’s computer? If there’s one thing she didn’t want to go near, it would
be his computer. So… Hillary’s emails are intermingled with Anthony Weiner’s
sexting? No wonder she had her server wiped! I’d have had it boiled.”

He continued: “This is the world we live in now: Hillary Clinton’s aide’s
estranged husband is a freak, so we get to read Hillary Clinton’s emails. I
wish Hillary would send a text to Donald Trump. Maybe then we would get to see
his taxes.”

[FairfieldLife] Re: Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

FWIW, a correction to my last point below: According to a detailed story in
Newsweek, an official has said the emails aren't *either* from *or* to Clinton.

The Newsweek story is worth reading:

The real reason the FBI is reviewing more of Hillary Clinton's Emails
http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-comey-donald-trump-anthony-weiner-huma-abedin-514918

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-comey-donald-trump-anthony-weiner-huma-abedin-514918

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

The Trump faction and all the Hillary-haters sure will try to make it sound
like that. But it's almost certainly yet another nothingburger.

A few facts not available on Drudge:

--The FBI hasn't read the emails yet. They have to get a court order first. So
they have no idea what's in them.

--The investigation that was completed in July has not been "reopened."

--The emails have nothing to do with Wikileaks or the Russian hackers.

--According to a senior law enforcement official, there are no indications
that these emails were withheld by Clinton, her campaign, or the State
Department.

--There are apparently no emails *from* Clinton; they're from Huma Abedin *to*
Clinton.

Thanks for clarifying what people like Mike are too lazy and knee-jerk in
their jumping to wild conclusions to take the time to understand. He's like a
typical Trump-like supporter (even thought he says he's not) who hear something
and it becomes a steady chant in their heads "lock her up, lock her up" and
their glassy eyes stare unseeing into the distance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaejWf5NIfI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaejWf5NIfI

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Looks like the fit is hitting the shan!
October surprise

[FairfieldLife] Re: Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-29 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Just to reiterate: The FBI doesn't yet know what's in the emails. They have to 
get a court order before they can read them. It's entirely possible that some 
or all of the emails are duplicates of those already in the FBI's possession 
from other sources. 

 When the Clinton haters--Trump and his minions and Republicans like Ryan and 
Chaffetz--claim the FBI must have found sensational emails proving Clinton's 
guilt or they wouldn't have made this announcement so close to the election, 
they are not telling the truth.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 as usual, it is a yawn - HRC says get it all out in the open. Why should she 
care? She doesn't hide her taxes, or suggest grabbing someone's genitals. 
Compared to that orange sex offender and tax cheat, she comes across like a 
saint. 
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Looks like the fit is hitting the shan!
 October surprise

[FairfieldLife] Re: Check-out Drudge Report now.

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

The Trump faction and all the Hillary-haters sure will try to make it sound 
like that. But it's almost certainly yet another nothingburger. 

 A few facts not available on Drudge:
 

 --The FBI hasn't read the emails yet. They have to get a court order first. So 
they have no idea what's in them.
 

 --The investigation that was completed in July has not been "reopened."
 

 --The emails have nothing to do with Wikileaks or the Russian hackers.
 

 --According to a senior law enforcement official, there are no indications 
that these emails were withheld by Clinton, her campaign, or the State 
Department.
 

 --There are apparently no emails *from* Clinton; they're from Huma Abedin *to* 
Clinton.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Looks like the fit is hitting the shan!
 October surprise

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

He's making stuff up. I never said Bhairitu thought Moore was supporting Trump. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  You seem to be making the same mistake that Barry did on The Corner. 
 

 What's this with the bawee thing? First you compare me to bawee and now 
authfriend. Get a grip and give yourself some distance from whatever is 
happening over there at the Water Closet. It seems to be some sort of infection 
and you're possibly contagious.
 

  I already knew Moore was supporting Clinton.  And a lot of the Trump 
supporters knew that too.  Moore is not going to bite the Hollywood Hillary 
supporting hands that feed him.  But what he pointed out was nothing more than 
many political analysts have been pointing out for months about the Trump 
supporters.  They're against the establishment that has royally screwed them 
over.
 
 The Moore video was just a piece of cheese dropped in to the maze to see the 
reaction. :-D
  
 On 10/27/2016 06:50 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Bhairitu is all overstimulated because Michael Moore has been babbling about 
how Hillary's going to lose.
 
 
 Trump is thrilled too; so's his son. 
 
 Moore tweeted:
 

 Hey everyone - Trump, Jr. & right wing thinks my movie called "TrumpLand" is 
pro-Trump! Haha. Pls don't tell them otherwise! 

 

 Speaking of TweedleDumber...
 
 
 It's hard to imagine the mindset of folks so consumed by hatred of Hillary 
that they're actually hoping Trump wins.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa@... 
mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.
 

 And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.
 

 Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.
 

 Woo hoo.  
 

 Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds 
of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.
 

 Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.


 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  You seem to be making the same mistake that Barry did on The Corner.  I 
already knew Moore was supporting Clinton.
 

 Get a grip, Bhairitu. I never said you didn't know that.
  
 And a lot of the Trump supporters knew that too.
 
 Most of the YouTube commenters didn't. And the Trumps don't.
 

 Moore is not going to bite the Hollywood Hillary supporting hands that feed 
him.
 

 Oh, right, I forgot, nobody supports Hillary unless they're being paid to do 
so. Good lord, talk about delusional.
 

 But what he pointed out was nothing more than many political analysts have 
been pointing out for months about the Trump supporters.  They're against the 
establishment that has royally screwed them over.

 

 Duh. Stop the presses! Whatever would we do without Mooresplanations?
 

 

 

 The Moore video was just a piece of cheese dropped in to the maze to see the 
reaction. :-D

  
 On 10/27/2016 06:50 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Bhairitu is all overstimulated because Michael Moore has been babbling about 
how Hillary's going to lose.
 
 
 Trump is thrilled too; so's his son. 
 
 Moore tweeted:
 

 Hey everyone - Trump, Jr. & right wing thinks my movie called "TrumpLand" is 
pro-Trump! Haha. Pls don't tell them otherwise! 

 

 Speaking of TweedleDumber...
 
 
 It's hard to imagine the mindset of folks so consumed by hatred of Hillary 
that they're actually hoping Trump wins.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa@... 
mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.
 

 And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.
 

 Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.
 

 Woo hoo.  
 

 Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds 
of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.
 

 Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.


 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

I hope you're just joking. This is an utterly ridiculous idea. The very last
thing Trump would want, or consent to, is to be publicly declared a "loser."

For those interested, two "enlightening" articles that appeared today about
the Trump campaign's plans for after the election (win or lose):

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-27/inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/28/will-donald-trumps-uprising-go-global-even-if-he-loses/

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

noozguru, yep, I've begun to wonder if there's some very bizarre deal bt
Clinton and Trump. This morning it's reported that he's advocating not having
an election, just give the win to him! It's almost insane to think that he's
not throwing the election her way by his extreme behavior. Oh, what a movie it
would make. (-:

From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess. Conservative
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal. In fact he may be to
the left of Clinton. They're buddies too so sometimes I think they're playing
a massive charade on the American people.

I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others. I thought the
Sanders was a long shot but he did well in his campaign. I think he should
still be the Democratic Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did
everything they could to get him out of the race. Remember both Trump and
Sanders are on the same page regarding trade agreements, job loss and wars of
empire. Clinton just tries to snow her followers.

On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:

I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the
election arrives.

I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

LOL! And just how are these polls conducted? Have you not read that this
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?

The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber. Ho-hum. Welcome to politics
South American style.

Sal

On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For those who may be new to lurking FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group, I 
want to be clear that as a spiritual Yahoo-group we do not support any one 
mundane political candidate over any other candidate.
 Of course "we" don't. FFL is not a corporate entity and isn't set up to take 
any positions on anything as a group, including:

 However there seems a communal feeling by some here that is both spiritual and 
postmodern scientific that Natural Law, quite evidently when enlivened by the 
individual and group practice of effective transcendent meditation, will 
support a best outcome for the nation and world.


 And as to the P.P.S. below: Nobody agreed to refrain from posting about their 
support for specific political candidates when they joined FFL, nor has that 
ever been a requirement for membership.

 

 P.P.S., This does not mean that we, as individuals, do not support specific 
candidates. We may do so, offline.
 

 If you want to make this a rule, you need to put it in the About section, and 
you need to make sure anybody who joins the group understands that they're 
giving up the right to publicly support specific candidates in their postings 
here.
 

 Moreover, imposing new rules on people who have been FFL members for many 
years and who never agreed to those rules when they joined is devious, to say 
the least, and reflects very poorly on the claimed status of this group as a 
"spiritual" one, IMHO.
 

 

 

 And we could be sure to exercise a civic duty and vote for the candidates we 
believe will serve a nation in the most evolutionary way.

 

 Welcome to FairfieldLife,
 -Jai Guru You
 

 

 

 FairfieldLife, a (spiritual) Yahoo-group:
Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but  a conversation about 
spiritual questions.   What did it mean for our spiritual lives?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 In fact he may be to the left of Clinton.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 They're buddies too
 

 Uh, no.
 

  so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot
 

 ("the Sanders"??)
 

 but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should still be the Democratic 
Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to 
get him out of the race.
 

 Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes).
 

 Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.
 

 Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk 
who has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She 
snows people because she's so obviously qualified to be president.
 

 

 
 
 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 In fact he may be to the left of Clinton.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 They're buddies too
 

 Uh, no.
 

  so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot
 

 ("the Sanders"??)
 

 but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should still be the Democratic 
Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to 
get him out of the race.
 

 Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes).
 

 Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.
 

 Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk 
who has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She 
snows people because she's so obviously qualified to be president.
 

 

 

 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Bhairitu is all overstimulated because Michael Moore has been babbling about 
how Hillary's going to lose. 

 Trump is thrilled too; so's his son. 

 Moore tweeted:
 

 Hey everyone - Trump, Jr. & right wing thinks my movie called "TrumpLand" is 
pro-Trump! Haha. Pls don't tell them otherwise! 

 

 Speaking of TweedleDumber...
 

 It's hard to imagine the mindset of folks so consumed by hatred of Hillary 
that they're actually hoping Trump wins.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa@... 
mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.
 

 And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.
 

 Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.
 

 Woo hoo.  
 

 Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds 
of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.
 

 Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.


 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

[FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Call to Spiritual Order,Rally Now to Meditation!

2016-10-24 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

So for this thing to be whipped would mean the number of meditators that Doug 
thinks will keep this thing from losing would be gathered? How does he know how 
many would be sufficient? 

 And then, what does "losing" mean in this context? It can't refer to one 
candidate or the other not winning the election, since Doug has declared all of 
TM-land to be neutral in that regard; Nature will make the choice for us, you 
see.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 It means people who practice meditation, probably Transcendental Meditation 
specifically, should meditate in clumps — together — and that presumably will 
effect the outcome of the election. 

 And that in his view, people are not doing this, and the result he desires 
will not come to pass.
 

 What if someone has the opposite desire and people gather and meditate so that 
specific desire is fulfilled?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Friends of meditating, we are 15 days out. The Presidential contest is close 
enough I'm feeling that if we don't whip this right now with meditating 
collectively in proximity we just might lose the whole thing.
 

 What the heck does this mean, Doug? I can't make any sense of it.
 

 

 

 As we know by experience and the science, numbers meditating and their 
proximity do matter in collective meditation.

  
 I would personally be grateful to you if you would join us now, join us in 
meditating in Fairfield, Iowa. 

 This is not a usual fight. People often fight for money or land and things but 
we are meditating for each other here. Come join us in this rare fight.  

 We could use your help. Come join with us now in a collective group of 
meditation, in Fairfield, Iowa! 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Meditators, I would personally be grateful to you if you would join us now, 
join us in meditating and at the Domes in Fairfield, Iowa. This is not a usual 
fight. People often fight for money or land and things but we are meditating 
for each other here. Come join us in this rare fight. -JaiGuruYou 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Inside of 18 days now.  The debates are past. People are deciding now how they 
are voting and some are early- voting now.  It is time now to certainly attend 
to meditation. 
 “These are the times which try human souls” 

 May All blessings and grace of the Unified Field be upon us now for the work 
in progress we now have at hand.  It is come the time for more meditation,  
-JaiGuruYou   

 Fairfield Housing for Arriving Meditators: website at: 
 www.idealifeassembly.com http://www.idealifeassembly.com/ 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Peer-reviewed, published, replicated, honest-to-goodness, gold-standard 
scientific research leads us to make this heartfelt request to you: Come and 
join us in Fairfield for any number of days between Oct 12th and Nov 12th.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We're inside three weeks to the election. Days..
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Friends, 

 Today we are now at 35 days and tomorrow, this Tuesday, is one month before 
the general election for the United States of America President, and what then 
will become the complexion of governance of our USA.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We ask your help to be with us now in a meditation of coherence.  Come now.  
Come quickly and assemble. There is ample housing and stores of plenty here to 
keep you here.  Certainly it is up to you to assemble.  

 You might stay at home alone in a comfort of your house and room but never 
will you be able to do so great a thing as to assemble with this now.  Come 
quickly as you can, come now to Fairfield, Iowa for the enhancement of a 
collective peace in meditation. Arrange your affairs quickly and come directly. 

 In numbers gathered close it will be our great honor and privilege to be 
meditating together with you alongside. Come join in the collective practice of 
group meditation. We flatter ourselves, therefore, that, in this case, too, 
nothing will be wanting which the World has a right to expect of your valor. It 
is time to assemble in collective meditation.
 Jai Guru You!  -Doug in Fairfield, Iowa   
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 37 Days to the Presidential Election.. 

 Meditators, Brothers and Sisters in Eternity, Shake your souls! AWAKE! An hour 
so long waiting for has come. Over a dark firmament of suffering Humanity is 
rising the Morning Star, heralding the day when we will understand that 
people’s most sacred duty is to be Human - that is, to manifest LIFE, 
INTELLIGENCE, TRUTH and LOVE. There is no higher aim, no vaster

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Call to Spiritual Order,Rally Now to Meditation!

2016-10-24 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Friends of meditating, we are 15 days out. The Presidential contest is close 
enough I'm feeling that if we don't whip this right now with meditating 
collectively in proximity we just might lose the whole thing.
 

 What the heck does this mean, Doug? I can't make any sense of it.
 

 

 

 As we know by experience and the science, numbers meditating and their 
proximity do matter in collective meditation.

  
 I would personally be grateful to you if you would join us now, join us in 
meditating in Fairfield, Iowa. 

 This is not a usual fight. People often fight for money or land and things but 
we are meditating for each other here. Come join us in this rare fight.  

 We could use your help. Come join with us now in a collective group of 
meditation, in Fairfield, Iowa! 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Meditators, I would personally be grateful to you if you would join us now, 
join us in meditating and at the Domes in Fairfield, Iowa. This is not a usual 
fight. People often fight for money or land and things but we are meditating 
for each other here. Come join us in this rare fight. -JaiGuruYou 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Inside of 18 days now.  The debates are past. People are deciding now how they 
are voting and some are early- voting now.  It is time now to certainly attend 
to meditation. 
 “These are the times which try human souls” 

 May All blessings and grace of the Unified Field be upon us now for the work 
in progress we now have at hand.  It is come the time for more meditation,  
-JaiGuruYou   

 Fairfield Housing for Arriving Meditators: website at: 
 www.idealifeassembly.com http://www.idealifeassembly.com/ 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Peer-reviewed, published, replicated, honest-to-goodness, gold-standard 
scientific research leads us to make this heartfelt request to you: Come and 
join us in Fairfield for any number of days between Oct 12th and Nov 12th.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We're inside three weeks to the election. Days..
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Friends, 

 Today we are now at 35 days and tomorrow, this Tuesday, is one month before 
the general election for the United States of America President, and what then 
will become the complexion of governance of our USA.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We ask your help to be with us now in a meditation of coherence.  Come now.  
Come quickly and assemble. There is ample housing and stores of plenty here to 
keep you here.  Certainly it is up to you to assemble.  

 You might stay at home alone in a comfort of your house and room but never 
will you be able to do so great a thing as to assemble with this now.  Come 
quickly as you can, come now to Fairfield, Iowa for the enhancement of a 
collective peace in meditation. Arrange your affairs quickly and come directly. 

 In numbers gathered close it will be our great honor and privilege to be 
meditating together with you alongside. Come join in the collective practice of 
group meditation. We flatter ourselves, therefore, that, in this case, too, 
nothing will be wanting which the World has a right to expect of your valor. It 
is time to assemble in collective meditation.
 Jai Guru You!  -Doug in Fairfield, Iowa   
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 37 Days to the Presidential Election.. 

 Meditators, Brothers and Sisters in Eternity, Shake your souls! AWAKE! An hour 
so long waiting for has come. Over a dark firmament of suffering Humanity is 
rising the Morning Star, heralding the day when we will understand that 
people’s most sacred duty is to be Human - that is, to manifest LIFE, 
INTELLIGENCE, TRUTH and LOVE. There is no higher aim, no vaster problem, and 
you who realize this will break the fetters with which Ignorance & Fear have 
bound unconscious Humanity, will stand up free, and know yourselves to be the 
Eternal Manifestation of the Unmanifest, Witnesses of the Absolute, Sons and 
Daughters of that GREAT ALL, whom you call GOD the Unified Field. 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 43 Days to the Election.
 

 Maintain your core,

 

Be of Service to all and Rally Now,  

 to Meditation!

 

 By our reference of our own experience as transcendentalists and by what is 
modern science, it is quite time now to assemble ourselves collectively by 
coming together with other meditators. 
 -Jai Guru You
 


 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Friends, Meditationists;  
 As you know, the research (really strong research) shows that meditators and 
Sidhas doing their TM-Sidhi® program in numbers and in proximity together in a 
group create

[FairfieldLife] Re: Steve, Come Back!

2016-10-23 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No, I didn't do nothing around Steve 7Ray. 

 Maybe he did something in his own settings when he was saying he was leaving.
 I did notice he was at the receiving end of some demeaning personalized posting
 that went beyond consideration of ccontent and he
 said he had enough of that.
 

 You forgot to mention that he was also on the sending end, big-time.
 

 

 

  I always appreciated his content too.  7Ray was perceptive and I miss him 
too. 

 

 List owner and moderator,
 -Dug Jung Un 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 He is still subscribed, but his posting has been disabled. Unfortunately, the 
stupid Yahoo interface is showing no record of his posting being yanked. All I 
know is that I had nothing to with this. My guess is that Doug pulled the plug, 
and a Yahoo glitch prevented the action from showing up in the moderator 
activity log. Questions should be directed to Doug: dhamiltony2k5 @ Yahoo.com


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Get back over here, Steve. I miss your posts.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Heartbreaking

2016-10-23 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

It's not just that, though. It's that being the target of racist rhetoric can 
cause long-lasting damage to children psychologically, even if the racist 
attacks were (miraculously) to cease. 

 The children doing the attacking are, of course, damaged as well.
 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 No, because his insane supporters will still be with us, by the millions.  And 
the Republican party, or what’s left of it, will still be giving them a voice. 
 Sal 
 

 





On Oct 23, 2016, at 12:04 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 

 "All the black and brown people have to leave": Trump’s scary impact on how 
kids think 
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/10/20/13319366/donald-trump-racism-bigotry-children-bullying-muslim-mexican-black-immigrant

 
 
 
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/10/20/13319366/donald-trump-racism-bigotry-children-bullying-muslim-mexican-black-immigrant
 
 "All the black and brown people have to leave"... 
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/10/20/13319366/donald-trump-racism-bigotry-children-bullying-muslim-mexican-black-immigrant
 Children have picked up on all the racist rhetoric.


 
 View on www.vox.com 
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/10/20/13319366/donald-trump-racism-bigotry-children-bullying-muslim-mexican-black-immigrant
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 What Trumpism is doing to kids, and why, even if he loses, the damage won't 
heal.

[FairfieldLife] Heartbreaking

2016-10-23 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

"All the black and brown people have to leave": Trump’s scary impact on how 
kids think 
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/10/20/13319366/donald-trump-racism-bigotry-children-bullying-muslim-mexican-black-immigrant

 
 
 
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/10/20/13319366/donald-trump-racism-bigotry-children-bullying-muslim-mexican-black-immigrant
 
 
 "All the black and brown people have to leave"... 
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/10/20/13319366/donald-trump-racism-bigotry-children-bullying-muslim-mexican-black-immigrant
 Children have picked up on all the racist rhetoric.
 
 
 
 View on www.vox.com 
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/10/20/13319366/donald-trump-racism-bigotry-children-bullying-muslim-mexican-black-immigrant
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 What Trumpism is doing to kids, and why, even if he loses, the damage won't 
heal.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Steve, Come Back!

2016-10-23 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

That is strange. 

 Just testing to see whether I've been "disabled" too!
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 He is still subscribed, but his posting has been disabled. Unfortunately, the 
stupid Yahoo interface is showing no record of his posting being yanked. All I 
know is that I had nothing to with this. My guess is that Doug pulled the plug, 
and a Yahoo glitch prevented the action from showing up in the moderator 
activity log. Questions should be directed to Doug: dhamiltony2k5 @ Yahoo.com
 

 What?! I just thought Steve had stopped posting on his own volition. Now it 
could be there is foul work afoot? Dastardly! Doug, do you have anything to add?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Get back over here, Steve. I miss your posts.

[FairfieldLife] Re: UFO Wreckage Found, dating 250,000 years old

2016-10-21 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

I don't think I suggested I had any information that the tests were flawed,
did I? I'm saying that is a far more likely possibility than that the piece of
metal is that old. I don't need any information that the tests were flawed to
make that assertion.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Judy,

You don't have any information that the tests were flawed. The article states
that a lab at Lausanne, Switzerland, performed the test. The lab could have
performed the tests correctly. If true, the aluminum metal could have come
from ETs since humans could not have manufactured the metal at that early date.

Or, another possibility could happen. That the metal came from a previous
group of humans from another age, who were advanced than the present age.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Actually, John, what "stands to reason" is that the tests on the age of this
piece of metal were seriously flawed.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

The item found was made of aluminum. At that time, humans did not have the
technology to make aluminum. So, it stands to reason that the item could have
been made by non-humans or ETs that visited the earth at that time.

Investigator Claims 'Ufo Wreckage' Is Evidence Aliens Visited The Earth
250,000 Years Ago
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/10/21/investigator-claims-ufo-wreckage-is-evidence-aliens-visited-earth-25-years-ago.html

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/10/21/investigator-claims-ufo-wreckage-is-evidence-aliens-visited-earth-25-years-ago.html

Investigator Claims 'Ufo Wreckage' Is Evidence A...
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/10/21/investigator-claims-ufo-wreckage-is-evidence-aliens-visited-earth-25-years-ago.html
The discovery of an ancient piece of aluminium is being hailed as evidence
that aliens visited Earth 250,000 years ago.

View on www.foxnews.com
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/10/21/investigator-claims-ufo-wreckage-is-evidence-aliens-visited-earth-25-years-ago.html
Preview by Yahoo

[FairfieldLife] Re: UFO Wreckage Found, dating 250,000 years old

2016-10-21 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Actually, John, what "stands to reason" is that the tests on the age of this 
piece of metal were seriously flawed. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The item found was made of aluminum.  At that time, humans did not have the 
technology to make aluminum.  So, it stands to reason  that the item could have 
been made by non-humans or ETs that visited the earth at that time.
 

 Investigator Claims 'Ufo Wreckage' Is Evidence Aliens Visited The Earth 
250,000 Years Ago 
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/10/21/investigator-claims-ufo-wreckage-is-evidence-aliens-visited-earth-25-years-ago.html
 
 
 
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/10/21/investigator-claims-ufo-wreckage-is-evidence-aliens-visited-earth-25-years-ago.html
 
 Investigator Claims 'Ufo Wreckage' Is Evidence A... 
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/10/21/investigator-claims-ufo-wreckage-is-evidence-aliens-visited-earth-25-years-ago.html
 The discovery of an ancient piece of aluminium is being hailed as evidence 
that aliens visited Earth 250,000 years ago.


 
 View on www.foxnews.com 
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/10/21/investigator-claims-ufo-wreckage-is-evidence-aliens-visited-earth-25-years-ago.html
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] After Hillary's Win

2016-10-20 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

You don't find the article you linked to scary? 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 On 10/19/2016 08:46 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Here's an article about life after a Trump loss:
 After Trump loses: An ominous American future imagined 
 
 
 
 After Trump loses: An ominous American future ... A dispatch from the 
near-future


 
 View on theweek.com 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 


 

 My God, how do you sleep at night?




 
 Quit well. Why?

[FairfieldLife] Re: Hillary's outfit

2016-10-20 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

FWIW: This would never have occurred to me, but it's been pointed out that she 
wore red for the first debate, blue for the second...and white for the third. 
Nice symbolism! 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 All-white. Loved it. Beauty and the Beast. Or St. Hillary and the Dragon.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead Democrats

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

The integrity of anything produced by right-winger James O'Keefe is seriously 
suspect. He's the dude who did the tapes that falsely implicated Planned 
Parenthood for illegally selling fetuses for research, among several other 
"stings" using selectively (deceptively) edited video. He refuses to release 
the original Creamer tapes, which should make anybody think twice about whether 
to believe what the edited versions allegedly reveal. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
100percentfedup.com/lol-dem-operative-tied-hillary-quits-hes-caught-discussing-voter-fraud-efforts-undercover-tape-video/
 
http://100percentfedup.com/lol-dem-operative-tied-hillary-quits-hes-caught-discussing-voter-fraud-efforts-undercover-tape-video/
 

 

 Robert Creamer resigns from campaign after being caught discussing voter fraud
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:26 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats
 
 
   Non sequitur.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And John Wilkes Booth was an actor.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:07 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats

 
   Robert Creamer has been a political organizer and strategist for four 
decades. He and his firm, Democracy Partners, work with many of the country’s 
most significant issue campaigns. He was one of the major architects and 
organizers of the successful campaign to defeat the privatization of Social 
Security. He has been a consultant to the campaigns to end the war in Iraq, 
pass universal health care, pass Wall Street reform, change America’s budget 
priorities, enact comprehensive immigration reform, promulgate new employer 
overtime rules, and pass the Nuclear Agreement with Iran. He has also worked on 
hundreds of electoral campaigns at the local, state and national level -- and 
served as a consultant to the DNC and President Obama's campaigns in 2008 and 
2012.

 

 Robert Creamer | Huffington Post 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer 
 
 Robert Creamer | Huffington Post 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer Robert Creamer has been a 
political organizer and strategist for four decades. He and his firm, Democracy 
Partners, work with many of the country’s most significant issue campaigns.


 
 View on www.huffingtonpost.com 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 
 
dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 

 

 Dem Operative Who Oversaw Trump Rally Agitators Visited White House 342 Times 
A key operative in a Democratic scheme to send agitators to cause unrest at 
Donald Trump's rallies has visit... 
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 


 
 


 From: "Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats

 
   
 Yes John.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU 

 

 Election Expert: There Are 4 Million Dead People on US Voter Rolls Elections 
expert J. Christian Adams told FOX and Friends on Tuesday morning there are 4 
million dead people on U... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU
 


 
 


 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:15 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats

 
   
 Does that still happen today?  In the past, Lyndon Johnson did the same tactic 
in Texas.
 

 Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With Dead Democrats 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 
 
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 
 Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With De... 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 Rudy Giuliani said he believed elections in some big cities could be rigged, 
some with dead Democrat voters, obviously harming Republican presidential 
nominee Donal...

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Call to Spiritual Order,Rally Now to Meditation!

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

It would be a lot smarter to call for a month-long rally *after* the election. 
That's when we're really going to need it. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Peer-reviewed, published, replicated, honest-to-goodness, gold-standard 
scientific research leads us to make this heartfelt request to you: Come and 
join us in Fairfield for any number of days between Oct 12th and Nov 12th.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We're inside three weeks to the election. Days..
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Friends, 

 Today we are now at 35 days and tomorrow, this Tuesday, is one month before 
the general election for the United States of America President, and what then 
will become the complexion of governance of our USA.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We ask your help to be with us now in a meditation of coherence.  Come now.  
Come quickly and assemble. There is ample housing and stores of plenty here to 
keep you here.  Certainly it is up to you to assemble.  

 You might stay at home alone in a comfort of your house and room but never 
will you be able to do so great a thing as to assemble with this now.  Come 
quickly as you can, come now to Fairfield, Iowa for the enhancement of a 
collective peace in meditation. Arrange your affairs quickly and come directly. 

 In numbers gathered close it will be our great honor and privilege to be 
meditating together with you alongside. Come join in the collective practice of 
group meditation. We flatter ourselves, therefore, that, in this case, too, 
nothing will be wanting which the World has a right to expect of your valor. It 
is time to assemble in collective meditation.
 Jai Guru You!  -Doug in Fairfield, Iowa   
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 37 Days to the Presidential Election.. 

 Meditators, Brothers and Sisters in Eternity, Shake your souls! AWAKE! An hour 
so long waiting for has come. Over a dark firmament of suffering Humanity is 
rising the Morning Star, heralding the day when we will understand that 
people’s most sacred duty is to be Human - that is, to manifest LIFE, 
INTELLIGENCE, TRUTH and LOVE. There is no higher aim, no vaster problem, and 
you who realize this will break the fetters with which Ignorance & Fear have 
bound unconscious Humanity, will stand up free, and know yourselves to be the 
Eternal Manifestation of the Unmanifest, Witnesses of the Absolute, Sons and 
Daughters of that GREAT ALL, whom you call GOD the Unified Field. 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 43 Days to the Election.
 

 Maintain your core,

 

Be of Service to all and Rally Now,  

 to Meditation!

 

 By our reference of our own experience as transcendentalists and by what is 
modern science, it is quite time now to assemble ourselves collectively by 
coming together with other meditators. 
 -Jai Guru You
 


 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Friends, Meditationists;  
 As you know, the research (really strong research) shows that meditators and 
Sidhas doing their TM-Sidhi® program in numbers and in proximity together in a 
group create coherence in the nationwide field of consciousness. It’s the most 
statistically valid research in all of the social sciences. Now is a moment in 
our lives when we need to take advantage of this special piece of information, 
which somehow has devolved upon us, to do something vital for our nation, our 
families, and ourselves.

 

 45 Days to the Election..
 

 Contact and report to staff locally in Fairfield for accommodations. 

 Fairfield Housing for Arriving Meditators: website at: 
 Home http://www.idealifeassembly.com/ 
 
 http://www.idealifeassembly.com/
 
 Home http://www.idealifeassembly.com/ "It has been a real pleasure to welcome 
the bright and friendly course participants to the IdeaLife Assembly campus, 
from around the country and the world.


 
 View on www.idealifeassembly... http://www.idealifeassembly.com/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 48 Days to Election Day..
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Meditators everywhere, it is quite time to elect 
 

 coherence in group meditation.
 

  It is time to assemble in collective meditation.

 

 The hour is at hand.

 

We ask your help to be with us now in a meditation of coherence.  Come now.  
Come quickly and assemble. There is ample housing and stores of plenty here to 
keep you here.  Certainly it is up to you to assemble.  
 
You might stay at home alone in a comfort of your room but never will you be 
able to do so great a thing as to assemble with this now.  Come quickly as you 
can, come now to Fairfield, Iowa for the enhancement of a collective peace in 
meditation. Arrange your affairs

Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead Democrats

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

There's virtually no evidence of dead people voting.
Of course *dead* people don't vote! Someone votes in their place with a
photoless ID or by mail in ballot.

Yes, Mike, I'm aware of that. Could you be a little more literal-minded,
please? Here, I'll rephrase to help you out:

There's virtually no evidence of live people voting in place of dead people.

How do you know Democrats don't want the voter rolls cleansed
Did you watch the whole video? Perhaps it was on another video but numerous
liberal organizations have sued to stop the purges of the voting rolls.

There are serious problems with the data used to "purge" the rolls, and as a
result huge numbers of voters are being dropped from the rolls when they
shouldn't be. See:

The GOP's Stealth War Against Voters
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890

The GOP's Stealth War Against Voters
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890
Will an anti-voter-fraud program designed by one of Donald Trump's advisers
deny tens of thousands their right to vote in November?

View on www.rollingstone.com
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890

Preview by Yahoo

But Mike knows better than to pretend that voter ID laws don't disenfranchise
minority voters (who tend to vote Democratic, of course).

Anyone can get the ID's, it's easy.

No, it's not that easy for many people (especially low-income people, i.e.,
minorities). That's the whole point of the laws: make it more difficult for
them to vote.

The voter ID laws were designed to protect the integrity of everyone else's
vote, not to suppress any other vote.

The voter ID laws (and several other measures to limit voting, including less
time for early voting, fewer polling places, etc.) were designed to suppress
minority (Democratic) voters. Republican state legislators have openly admitted
this, on the record. Voter ID laws are especially suspect because there is, as
I keep saying, virtually no evidence of actual voter fraud. There's nothing
significant for "everyone else's vote" to be protected *from*. "Protecting the
integrity of the vote" is just a disingenuous smokescreen. Shame on you for
perpetuating it.

From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead
Democrats

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

But they don't vote, Mike,

And you know this how?

Why do Democrats not want the voter rolls cleaned of these dead people?

The folks who are doing their best to rig the election are the Republicans who
have passed voter ID laws in their states to suppress participation by
minorities.

John, the voter ID laws simply require that in order to vote, you have to
produce a valid ID, such as a drivers license or state issued ID of some sort,
with a current photo.

You can't even cash your welfare check without one!

Not sure why Mike is addressing John here after quoting what I wrote. that
the laws were designed to reduce Democratic votes.

From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead
Democrats

and they're not a "plot" to "rig" the election. There's virtually no
evidence of voter fraud in this country.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Yes John.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU

Election Expert: There Are 4 Million Dead People on US Voter Rolls Elections
expert J. Christian Adams told FOX and Friends on Tuesday morning there are 4
million dead people on U... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU

From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:15 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead
Democrats

Does that still happen today? In the past, Lyndon Johnson did the same tactic
in Texas.

Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With Dead Democrats
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With

Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead Democrats

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Non sequitur. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And John Wilkes Booth was an actor.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:07 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats
 
 
   Robert Creamer has been a political organizer and strategist for four 
decades. He and his firm, Democracy Partners, work with many of the country’s 
most significant issue campaigns. He was one of the major architects and 
organizers of the successful campaign to defeat the privatization of Social 
Security. He has been a consultant to the campaigns to end the war in Iraq, 
pass universal health care, pass Wall Street reform, change America’s budget 
priorities, enact comprehensive immigration reform, promulgate new employer 
overtime rules, and pass the Nuclear Agreement with Iran. He has also worked on 
hundreds of electoral campaigns at the local, state and national level -- and 
served as a consultant to the DNC and President Obama's campaigns in 2008 and 
2012.

 

 Robert Creamer | Huffington Post 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer 
 
 Robert Creamer | Huffington Post 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer Robert Creamer has been a 
political organizer and strategist for four decades. He and his firm, Democracy 
Partners, work with many of the country’s most significant issue campaigns.


 
 View on www.huffingtonpost.com 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 
 
dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 

 

 Dem Operative Who Oversaw Trump Rally Agitators Visited White House 342 Times 
A key operative in a Democratic scheme to send agitators to cause unrest at 
Donald Trump's rallies has visit... 
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 


 
 


 From: "Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats

 
   
 Yes John.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU 

 

 Election Expert: There Are 4 Million Dead People on US Voter Rolls Elections 
expert J. Christian Adams told FOX and Friends on Tuesday morning there are 4 
million dead people on U... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU
 


 
 


 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:15 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats

 
   
 Does that still happen today?  In the past, Lyndon Johnson did the same tactic 
in Texas.
 

 Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With Dead Democrats 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 
 
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 
 Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With De... 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 Rudy Giuliani said he believed elections in some big cities could be rigged, 
some with dead Democrat voters, obviously harming Republican presidential 
nominee Donal...


 
 View on www.yahoo.com 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead Democrats

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

But they don't vote, Mike,

And you know this how?

There's virtually no evidence of dead people voting.

Why do Democrats not want the voter rolls cleaned of these dead people?

How do you know Democrats don't want the voter rolls cleansed?

The folks who are doing their best to rig the election are the Republicans who
have passed voter ID laws in their states to suppress participation by
minorities.

John, the voter ID laws simply require that in order to vote, you have to
produce a valid ID, such as a drivers license or state issued ID of some sort,
with a current photo.

You can't even cash your welfare check without one!

Not sure why Mike is addressing John here after quoting what I wrote. But Mike
knows better than to pretend that voter ID laws don't disenfranchise minority
voters (who tend to vote Democratic, of course). In fact, Republican
legislators have said openly, on the record, that the laws were designed to
reduce Democratic votes.

and they're not a "plot" to "rig" the election. There's virtually no
evidence of voter fraud in this country.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Yes John.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU

From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:15 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead
Democrats

Does that still happen today? In the past, Lyndon Johnson did the same tactic
in Texas.

Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With Dead Democrats
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With De...
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
Rudy Giuliani said he believed elections in some big cities could be rigged,
some with dead Democrat voters, obviously harming Republican presidential
nominee Donal...

View on www.yahoo.com
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead Democrats

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Robert Creamer has been a political organizer and strategist for four decades. 
He and his firm, Democracy Partners, work with many of the country’s most 
significant issue campaigns. He was one of the major architects and organizers 
of the successful campaign to defeat the privatization of Social Security. He 
has been a consultant to the campaigns to end the war in Iraq, pass universal 
health care, pass Wall Street reform, change America’s budget priorities, enact 
comprehensive immigration reform, promulgate new employer overtime rules, and 
pass the Nuclear Agreement with Iran. He has also worked on hundreds of 
electoral campaigns at the local, state and national level -- and served as a 
consultant to the DNC and President Obama's campaigns in 2008 and 2012.
 

 Robert Creamer | Huffington Post 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer 
 
 Robert Creamer | Huffington Post 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer Robert Creamer has been a 
political organizer and strategist for four decades. He and his firm, Democracy 
Partners, work with many of the country’s most significant issue campaigns. 
 
 
 
 View on www.huffingtonpost.com 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/robert-creamer 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 
 
dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 

 

 Dem Operative Who Oversaw Trump Rally Agitators Visited White House 342 Times 
A key operative in a Democratic scheme to send agitators to cause unrest at 
Donald Trump's rallies has visit... 
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/exposed-dem-operative-who-oversaw-trump-rally-agitators-visited-white-house-342-times/
 


 
 


 From: "Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
 Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats
 
 
   
 Yes John.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU 

 

 Election Expert: There Are 4 Million Dead People on US Voter Rolls Elections 
expert J. Christian Adams told FOX and Friends on Tuesday morning there are 4 
million dead people on U... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU
 


 
 


 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:15 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead 
Democrats

 
   
 Does that still happen today?  In the past, Lyndon Johnson did the same tactic 
in Texas.
 

 Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With Dead Democrats 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 
 
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 
 Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With De... 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 Rudy Giuliani said he believed elections in some big cities could be rigged, 
some with dead Democrat voters, obviously harming Republican presidential 
nominee Donal...


 
 View on www.yahoo.com 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead Democrats

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

But they don't vote, Mike, and they're not a "plot" to "rig" the election.
There's virtually no evidence of voter fraud in this country.

The folks who are doing their best to rig the election are the Republicans who
have passed voter ID laws in their states to suppress participation by
minorities.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Yes John.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHqlUrdEGwU

From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:15 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead
Democrats

Does that still happen today? In the past, Lyndon Johnson did the same tactic
in Texas.

Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With Dead Democrats
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

View on www.yahoo.com
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: to be president

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

A candidate's announcement that he or she practiced TM, specifically, would 
tend to be a negative to the religious right and evangelicals generally. That's 
a very significant voting bloc in this country. 

 The science-oriented among the millennials would likely be skeptical of a 
meditation practice associated with woo-woo like Yogic Flying or claiming 
widespread positive results from meditating in a group.
 

 BTW, if I were you, I wouldn't paint large groups of religious people as 
"rabid." Really doesn't look good coming from you.

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 On the way to the White House the identification of voter blocs becomes key to 
the work. In which blocs now would a candidate admitting to meditating be a 
negative? A positive?  
 

Yesterday in Fairfield, Iowa at a small shop we had a grocery bag stuffed with 
a X-ian flier insert that was all about TM being religion, cult and dangerous.  
Mindfulness practice maybe gets a pass and is not? 

 Voter bloc, how much could confrontational conservative X-ians as a particular 
vote bloc matter anymore to a candidate now admitting they meditate for their 
own well-being? 
 

 A 'meditating' candidate might be a plus to millennials. Can millennials and 
Gen-X and Y outweigh the shrinking rabid religious X-ian bloc in America? Would 
it be safe for any of the candidates to let it be known they meditate? Even 
'hip'? ..Maybe in the next election cycle. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 That is an interesting distinction, what, that mindfulness being out of a 
Buddhism teaching is possibly seen (by who?) as more benign?  Yet, recommending 
‘meditation’ to patients as preventive medical practice is now a part of 'best 
practices' of the AMA.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Most voters would probably be OK with a mindfulness practice, but not with TM. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 In the postmodern now would it really be a liability towards getting votes 
enough to the presidency for a candidate to admit they had learned to meditate? 
 And even, that they do regularly stop to meditate?
 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Generally about a 1 in 300 chance or a little better that any of these 
baby-boom age candidates learned to meditate, given the population in the US in 
the late 60’s and 1970’s. As you say, Depending on his attitude in the 1970s. 
 

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Depending on his attitude in the 1970s Trump may have learned TM too.  It was 
the "in" thing to do back then.  On 10/18/2016 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:
   I don't think the practice of TM has any effect on other family members. It 
never did on mine. 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:rick@... wrote :
 
 Trump’s kids are meditators, too. At least some of them. If that’s supposed to 
have had a positive influence on Trump, it obviously hasn’t. Or perhaps if they 
hadn’t been meditators, he would actually have been shooting people on 5th 
Avenue.
  
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 11:04 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to be president


  
  
 LOL
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 If Trump were married to the Virgin Mary I still wouldn't vote for him.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 I have the very uncomfortable feeling that Doug is actually looking for 
reasons to promote voting for Trump on FFL. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not sure 
how else to interpret this post.
  

  

  

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 Om, someone emerged stopping me in a Fairfield, Iowa cafe today 
 telling me in a reassuring way that ‘Malania’ 
 is a meditator. 
 Could the meditator consciousness Meissner Effect be strong enough with
 Malania only a heartbeat away from her President be reason enough
 to vote for her husband?
 Should this ‘fact’ influence the meditator demographic voting bloc?
 Otherwise, what does the science say,
 about disordered narcissism and the effect of meditation?
 What should Common sense say?

 
 
 

 Common sense says it is idiotic to even think that even if Melania were a 
meditator it would have one iota of effect on the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: to be president

2016-10-19 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

I'd be surprised if you weren't well aware, Doug, that mindfulness is widely 
seen and advertised as secular rather than Buddhist, a psychological rather 
than a religious practice, so your question is puzzling. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 That is an interesting distinction, what, that mindfulness being out of a 
Buddhism teaching is possibly seen (by who?) as more benign?  Yet, recommending 
‘meditation’ to patients as preventive medical practice is now a part of 'best 
practices' of the AMA.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Most voters would probably be OK with a mindfulness practice, but not with TM. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 In the postmodern now would it really be a liability towards getting votes 
enough to the presidency for a candidate to admit they had learned to meditate? 
 And even, that they do regularly stop to meditate?
 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Generally about a 1 in 300 chance or a little better that any of these 
baby-boom age candidates learned to meditate, given the population in the US in 
the late 60’s and 1970’s. As you say, Depending on his attitude in the 1970s. 
 

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Depending on his attitude in the 1970s Trump may have learned TM too.  It was 
the "in" thing to do back then.  On 10/18/2016 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:
   I don't think the practice of TM has any effect on other family members. It 
never did on mine. 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:rick@... wrote :
 
 Trump’s kids are meditators, too. At least some of them. If that’s supposed to 
have had a positive influence on Trump, it obviously hasn’t. Or perhaps if they 
hadn’t been meditators, he would actually have been shooting people on 5th 
Avenue.
  
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 11:04 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to be president


  
  
 LOL
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 If Trump were married to the Virgin Mary I still wouldn't vote for him.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 I have the very uncomfortable feeling that Doug is actually looking for 
reasons to promote voting for Trump on FFL. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not sure 
how else to interpret this post.
  

  

  

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 Om, someone emerged stopping me in a Fairfield, Iowa cafe today 
 telling me in a reassuring way that ‘Malania’ 
 is a meditator. 
 Could the meditator consciousness Meissner Effect be strong enough with
 Malania only a heartbeat away from her President be reason enough
 to vote for her husband?
 Should this ‘fact’ influence the meditator demographic voting bloc?
 Otherwise, what does the science say,
 about disordered narcissism and the effect of meditation?
 What should Common sense say?

 
 
 

 Common sense says it is idiotic to even think that even if Melania were a 
meditator it would have one iota of effect on the asshat that is her husband. 
It hasn't helped anything in the 11 years they have been married so it ain't 
gonna to anything worthwhile now. What a load of hogwash (appealing to the 
farmer in you).

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: to be president

2016-10-18 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Most voters would probably be OK with a mindfulness practice, but not with TM. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 In the postmodern now would it really be a liability towards getting votes 
enough to the presidency for a candidate to admit they had learned to meditate? 
 And even, that they do regularly stop to meditate?
 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Generally about a 1 in 300 chance or a little better that any of these 
baby-boom age candidates learned to meditate, given the population in the US in 
the late 60’s and 1970’s. As you say, Depending on his attitude in the 1970s. 
 

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Depending on his attitude in the 1970s Trump may have learned TM too.  It was 
the "in" thing to do back then.  On 10/18/2016 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:
   I don't think the practice of TM has any effect on other family members. It 
never did on mine. 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:rick@... wrote :
 
 Trump’s kids are meditators, too. At least some of them. If that’s supposed to 
have had a positive influence on Trump, it obviously hasn’t. Or perhaps if they 
hadn’t been meditators, he would actually have been shooting people on 5th 
Avenue.
  
 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 11:04 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to be president


  
  
 LOL
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 If Trump were married to the Virgin Mary I still wouldn't vote for him.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 I have the very uncomfortable feeling that Doug is actually looking for 
reasons to promote voting for Trump on FFL. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not sure 
how else to interpret this post.
  

  

  

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 wrote :
 Om, someone emerged stopping me in a Fairfield, Iowa cafe today 
 telling me in a reassuring way that ‘Malania’ 
 is a meditator. 
 Could the meditator consciousness Meissner Effect be strong enough with
 Malania only a heartbeat away from her President be reason enough
 to vote for her husband?
 Should this ‘fact’ influence the meditator demographic voting bloc?
 Otherwise, what does the science say,
 about disordered narcissism and the effect of meditation?
 What should Common sense say?

 
 
 

 Common sense says it is idiotic to even think that even if Melania were a 
meditator it would have one iota of effect on the asshat that is her husband. 
It hasn't helped anything in the 11 years they have been married so it ain't 
gonna to anything worthwhile now. What a load of hogwash (appealing to the 
farmer in you).

[FairfieldLife] Re: Giuliani: The elections will be rigged, with dead Democrats

2016-10-18 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

John, you could easily have looked this stuff up yourself. Took me about five 
minutes.
 

 The facts are that voter fraud is virtually nonexistent in this country. What 
we should be concerned about is the voter *suppression* resulting from GOP 
voter-ID laws, which are designed to reduce voter participation by minorities.
 

 And this election, we need to worry about voter *intimidation* by 
Trump-inspired volunteer poll vigilantes.
 

 

Questions and Answers on Voter Fraud 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/us/voter-id-laws-donald-trump.html 
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/us/voter-id-laws-donald-trump.html 
 
 Questions and Answers on Voter Fraud 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/us/voter-id-laws-donald-trump.html Donald J. 
Trump, denouncing recent rulings against voter identification laws, suggested 
that fraud at the polls is common. Experts say that is wrong.
 
 
 
 View on www.nytimes.com 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/05/us/voter-id-laws-donald-trump.html 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/20/opinion/the-success-of-the-voter-fraud-myth.html
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/20/opinion/the-success-of-the-voter-fraud-myth.html

 

 Trump Wrongly Insists Voter Fraud Is 'Very, Very Common' 
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/10/17/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-trump-voter-fraud.html
 
 
 
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/10/17/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-trump-voter-fraud.html
 
 
 Trump Wrongly Insists Voter Fraud Is 'Very, Very Com... 
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/10/17/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-trump-voter-fraud.html
 Donald Trump is insisting voter fraud does, indeed, pose a significant threat 
to the integrity of the U.S. electoral system, claiming the election could be 
rigged
 
 
 
 View on www.nytimes.com 
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/10/17/us/politics/ap-us-campaign-2016-trump-voter-fraud.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 


 

 

 The article you link to below is from NewsMax, a right-wing media outfit:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Does that still happen today?  In the past, Lyndon Johnson did the same tactic 
in Texas.
 

 Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With Dead Democrats 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html
 
 
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html
 
 Rudy Giuliani Agrees Elections Rigged, With De... 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html
 Rudy Giuliani said he believed elections in some big cities could be rigged, 
some with dead Democrat voters, obviously harming Republican presidential 
nominee Donal...


 
 View on www.yahoo.com 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/7e25-9622-3c1b-af1c-f4d7f26a8284/rudy-giuliani-agrees.html
 Preview by Yahoo

[FairfieldLife] Re: to be president

2016-10-17 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

I have the very uncomfortable feeling that Doug is actually looking for reasons 
to promote voting for Trump on FFL. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not sure how else 
to interpret this post. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Om, someone emerged stopping me in a Fairfield, Iowa cafe today 
 telling me in a reassuring way that ‘Malania’ 
 is a meditator. 
 Could the meditator consciousness Meissner Effect be strong enough with
 Malania only a heartbeat away from her President be reason enough
 to vote for her husband?
 Should this ‘fact’ influence the meditator demographic voting bloc?
 Otherwise, what does the science say,
 about disordered narcissism and the effect of meditation?
What should Common sense say?
 

 Common sense says it is idiotic to even think that even if Melania were a 
meditator it would have one iota of effect on the asshat that is her husband. 
It hasn't helped anything in the 11 years they have been married so it ain't 
gonna to anything worthwhile now. What a load of hogwash (appealing to the 
farmer in you).

[FairfieldLife] Re: to be president

2016-10-17 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

According to you, Doug, one of the most devoted, committed long-term TMers in 
the world, Bevan Morris, was ousted from his position as president of MUM 
because he was so inept at managing the university. 

 We also know that several long-term TMers who post regularly to this group 
have a penchant for coughing up false and malicious tales they've 
swallowed--without a hint of critical thinking--from right-wingers desperate to 
destroy Hillary Clinton.
 

 Why on *earth* should we think Melania's meditation practice (if indeed she 
has one--we don't know that for a fact) would have enough of a beneficial 
effect on her husband to make it reasonable to ignore the hundreds of reasons 
he's utterly unfit for the presidency?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Om, someone emerged stopping me in a Fairfield, Iowa cafe today 
 telling me in a reassuring way that ‘Malania’ 
 is a meditator. 
 Could the meditator consciousness Meissner Effect be strong enough with
 Malania only a heartbeat away from her President be reason enough
 to vote for her husband?
 Should this ‘fact’ influence the meditator demographic voting bloc?
 Otherwise, what does the science say,
 about disordered narcissism and the effect of meditation?
What should Common sense say?

[FairfieldLife] Re: Now This is Scary

2016-10-17 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

FWIW, the WaPo article that was the source for the Time article Ann links to 
and quotes from has been updated to reflect that the registration forms were 
not seized but photocopied, and the originals left with the registration 
offices. 

 That does NOT make everything OK with this stunt by any means, but it's not 
quite as bad as it sounds from the Time article.
 

 

 

 Group accuses Mike Pence of voter suppression after state police raid 
registration program in Indiana 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/15/group-accuses-mike-pence-of-voter-suppression-after-state-police-raid-registration-program-in-indiana/
 
 
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/15/group-accuses-mike-pence-of-voter-suppression-after-state-police-raid-registration-program-in-indiana/
 
 
 Group accuses Mike Pence of voter suppression after stat... 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/15/group-accuses-mike-pence-of-voter-suppression-after-state-police-raid-registration-program-in-indiana/
 During a recent campaign event, the Indiana governor noted that there was 
“vigorous” voter fraud investigation in his state.
 
 
 
 View on www.washingtonpost... 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/15/group-accuses-mike-pence-of-voter-suppression-after-state-police-raid-registration-program-in-indiana/
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  


 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Full article here but read the excerpt below:
 http://time.com/4533254/donald-trump-rigged-election-voter-suppression/ 
http://time.com/4533254/donald-trump-rigged-election-voter-suppression/

 

 Indiana’s Republican governor, Mike Pence—Trump’s running mate—has sent state 
troopers 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/15/group-accuses-mike-pence-of-voter-suppression-after-state-police-raid-registration-program-in-indiana/
 into more than half of the state’s counties to conduct “investigations” into 
potential voter fraud.
 In one county alone, state troopers seized application papers 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/15/group-accuses-mike-pence-of-voter-suppression-after-state-police-raid-registration-program-in-indiana/
 for more than 45,000 newly registered black voters—effectively keeping 
http://www.patriotmajority.org/news_and_events/2016-10-pences-state-police-trying-to-rig-2016-elections
 them from voting in what is likely to be close presidential and Senate 
contests in the state. Multiply that sort of seizure of newly registered voter 
papers in 50-plus counties in Indiana by state troopers conducting 
investigations, and it’s likely more than enough to make a difference in a 
close contest.
 Pence officials have said that the state police investigations are legitimate 
and that they believe instances of voter fraud will be found. But this looks 
mostly like voter suppression, conducted under the guise of an investigation of 
voter “fraud” (which, again, is essentially nonexistent in America). It’s more 
likely it has one simple, direct goal in mind: to disenfranchise voters. In 
this case, the goal would seem to be to keep newly registered black voters from 
supporting either Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton or Senate 
Democratic candidate Evan Bayh.
 Pence actively supports these efforts. In a video of one of his campaign 
events 
http://www.mediaite.com/online/pence-tells-rallygoer-dont-say-that-in-response-to-cry-for-revolution/,
 for instance, an audience member said: “One of the things that a lot of us are 
scared of is this voter fraud. I’m ready for a revolution, because we can’t 
have her in (office).” Pence responded, “Don’t say that,” and started backing 
away from her. But once he was beside the podium, Pence touted the state 
trooper voter fraud investigations in dozens of Indiana counties. “There’s a 
revolution coming on November 8th, I promise you,” Pence said. “I’ll tell you, 
in the state of Indiana right now, we’ve got a pretty vigorous investigation 
into voter fraud going on.”
 
 Compared to voter fraud, voter intimidation, is a much more insidious (and 
potentially dangerous) method of trying to win by keeping the other side from 
even showing up at polls. This is the tactic that Trump and his 
super-surrogate, Rudy Giuliani, have begun to deploy in recent days by actively 
encouraging their supporters to go to polling places in the suburbs and urban 
areas to “monitor 
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/16/politics/rudy-giuliani-rigged-elections-donald-trump/index.html”
 activities.

[FairfieldLife] Unfit to be president

2016-10-17 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/07/donald_trump_is_unfit_to_be_president_here_are_141_reasons_why.html
 
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/07/donald_trump_is_unfit_to_be_president_here_are_141_reasons_why.html

 

 Since this was first posted to Slate, there have been some additions. The list 
is now up to 230 reasons why Trump is unfit to be president.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Mon 17-Oct-16 00:15:07 UTC

2016-10-17 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

It's fine for corporate entities such as the TMO and MUM to declare that they 
do not, as organizations, take a position on the U.S. elections. 

 The same cannot be said of the Fairfield spiritual community or the Yahoo 
group Fairfield_Life, which are not corporate entities but collections of 
individuals. Nobody can validly say that these collections, or the individuals 
who compose the collections, take no position on the U.S. elections, nor that 
they subscribe to the "general communal premise" outlined below. Those would be 
empty, meaningless statements. These collections of individuals are not 
subsidiaries of the TMO or MUM.
 

 Any individual member of any of these collections is, of course, free to say 
that he or she takes no position on the elections. He or she, however, cannot 
legitimately make such a statement on behalf of any other individual without 
that individual's explicit permission.
 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 P.S. I want to be clear that as an organization on one hand and then the 
evident Fairfield spiritual community on the other hand, neither the TM 
movement, the meditating University in Fairfield, Iowa, nor does the evident 
spiritual practice community of Fairfield, Ia. or even FairfieldLife, a 
spiritual Yahoo-group, do not support or endorse any one candidate over any 
other candidate in this National election, a general communal premise otherwise 
being that Natural Law, when enlivened by our group practice of effective 
meditation, will support the best outcome for a nation.   -JaiGuruYou
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Notice of an Embargo, something of a road closure.. 

 

 We are upon 3 weeks now to the US election. It is certainly time with all that 
is spiritual going on otherwise to reel this place back in some and put an 
embargo on mundane political bickering that has become exclusive of any 
spiritual commentary. This is expected of us as a topical (spiritual) 
Yahoo-group and certainly there are lots of other places for mundane partisan 
bickering on the internet.  

 Notice and Fair Warning: Until the election day in the USA passes a heavy hand 
of moderation is going to fall over mundane political postings that come on to 
FFL with a particular embargo on posts which contain words, ‘Hillary’, 
‘Donald’, ‘Clinton’ or ‘Trump’.
 Writers should take alternate routes (detours) around these words for the next 
three weeks.   

 There are any number of capable writers posting to FFL. Those who have 
spiritual observation to offer can easily continue to offer their 
considerations on FairfieldLife, a Yahoo-group community.  -JaiGuruYou 
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Fairfield Life Post Counter
 ===
 Start Date (UTC): 10/15/16 00:00:00
 End Date (UTC): 10/22/16 00:00:00
 109 messages as of (UTC) 10/16/16 23:12:36
 
 26 authfriend
 22 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569
 13 emily.mae50
 11 awoelflebater
 10 Bhairitu noozguru
 5 jr_esq
 5 hepa7
 4 feste37 
 4 dhamiltony2k5
 3 olliesedwuz
 2 Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa
 1 j_alexander_stanley
 1 email4you mikemail4you
 1 Dick Mays dickmays
 1 Archer Angel archonangel
 Posters: 15
 Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
 =
 Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
 US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
 Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
 Standard Time (Winter):
 US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
 Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
 For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com

Re: [FairfieldLife] Post Count Mon 17-Oct-16 00:15:07 UTC

2016-10-17 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]



 a general communal premise otherwise being that Natural Law, when enlivened by 
our group practice of effective meditation, will support the best outcome for a 
nation.  
 

 If that’s still the prevailing feeling whoever spouts nonsense like that needs 
to get their head out of their backsides.  Voting is crucial.
 

 Yep. I would suggest that anyone who has the time and resources travel to the 
nearest battleground state, rent a hotel room or find a place to stay with 
friends, and volunteer for the GOTV operation at one of the local Democratic 
campaign offices.
 

 Group meditation is fine and dandy when a crisis point is approaching that 
ordinary people can do nothing about. But when individual people-power acting 
on the ground can make a positive difference in the outcome, that is the 
distinctly preferable option.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Mon 17-Oct-16 00:15:07 UTC

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

You are quoting Frontlne WY out of context. 

 Who is it that "expects of us" this so-called embargo? Who are the 
nonparticipants in this group behind the scenes who seek to control what the 
participating members may and may not say?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 Notice of an Embargo, something of a road closure.. 

 -Frontline, at FairfieldLife a (spiritual) Yahoo-group:
 Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but  a conversation about 
spiritual questions.   What did it mean for our spiritual lives?"   

 We are upon 3 weeks now to the US election. It is certainly time with all that 
is spiritual going on otherwise to reel this place back in some and put an 
embargo on mundane political bickering that has become exclusive of any 
spiritual commentary. This is expected of us as a topical (spiritual) 
Yahoo-group and certainly there are lots of other places for mundane partisan 
bickering on the internet.  

 Notice and Fair Warning: Until the election day in the USA passes a heavy hand 
of moderation is going to fall over mundane political postings that come on to 
FFL with a particular embargo on posts which contain words, ‘Hillary’, 
‘Donald’, ‘Clinton’ or ‘Trump’.
 Writers should take alternate routes (detours) around these words for the next 
three weeks.   

 There are any number of capable writers posting to FFL. Those who have 
spiritual observation to offer can easily continue to offer their 
considerations on FairfieldLife, a Yahoo-group community.  -JaiGuruYou   
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Fairfield Life Post Counter
 ===
 Start Date (UTC): 10/15/16 00:00:00
 End Date (UTC): 10/22/16 00:00:00
 109 messages as of (UTC) 10/16/16 23:12:36
 
 26 authfriend
 22 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569
 13 emily.mae50
 11 awoelflebater
 10 Bhairitu noozguru
 5 jr_esq
 5 hepa7
 4 feste37 
 4 dhamiltony2k5
 3 olliesedwuz
 2 Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa
 1 j_alexander_stanley
 1 email4you mikemail4you
 1 Dick Mays dickmays
 1 Archer Angel archonangel
 Posters: 15
 Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
 =
 Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
 US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
 Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
 Standard Time (Winter):
 US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
 Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
 For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Y'all know that on Saturday Trump accused Hillary of being on drugs for the 
second debate, right? 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yep. Funny when trump was trashing the family of a US soldier who died in the 
Middle East, playing bad boy with not releasing his taxes, bragging about how 
smart he was, and how dumb the rest of us were, etc., etc., etc., all of his 
sycophants and fanboys and girls were as happy as p__s in s__t. The media hung 
on every word, with Matt Lauer practically wetting himself during an interview 
with the orange abomination. 

Now that trump has raised the stakes of his brattiness to include sexual 
assault against women, everyone coast to coast has had enough, game over. 
Playing the American people like saps, as trump has in every area of life he 
enters, isn't a smart idea, and eventually, if you keep pushing the envelope as 
he did, eventually you will be told in no uncertain terms, to fuck off. 

This obviously isn't some media and establishment scheme to "get him". He has 
shown himself to be a worthless, illiterate, disrespectful, low-life sex 
offender from queens. Who would possibly want such scum for president, except 
those who think the same way he does?
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No. Trump himself. I listened to him. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And who told you that? The media?
 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 12:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   Much of the media is against Trump because he is a terrible candidate -- the 
worst the GOP has put forward in living memory. Of course the media is using 
its influence to persuade people not to vote for him. Nothing illegitimate or 
sinister about that. He is simply unqualified for the office, in any area you 
care to name. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes they have.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 

 

 

 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Hmmm, Republican campaign center in NC gets fire bombed.Cars at a Trump rally 
spray painted and vandalized, attendees at  Trump rallies attacked and beaten.
 

 Hmmm, maybe they were inspired by the Trump-supporting Milwaukee county 
sheriff who announced yesterday that it's "pitchforks and torches time." Or the 
two openly armed Trump supporters who "protested" by sitting outside a 
Democratic congressional candidate's office in Virginia for 12 hours on 
Thursday.
 

 

 

 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 3:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   To repeat:  You're losing touch with reality Mikey.  Stock up your bunker, 
go buy another gun, and get ready for the apocalypse.  And, get that manifesto 
out of your head and on paper.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Saul Alinsky taught that when you're caught doing something crooked, deny deny 
deny. Then blame your accusers.
 Hillary wrote a 92 page thesis, her senior year, about Saul Alinsky who some 
claim was a *community organizer* but was actually a crook and a thug.
 


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 2:52 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   
 The "delusionals" live in their own dream world.  Interesting to see such mass 
hypnosis.
 
 On 10/16/2016 10:27 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   New York Times, July.
 
 
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" mailto:authfriend@...[FairfieldLife] 
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Yes they have.
 
 

 No, they haven't.
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"  
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 
 

 From: feste37  mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Hillary is not a crook. That's a lie, plain and simple.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 If I'm *losing touch* with reality, at least I've known it.
 You're voting for a crook, that makes Nixon look like a saint, because she's a 
*woman*. Now that's living in an alternate universe.

 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   
 

‘SNL’ parodied the second presidential debate and it will briefly make you 
enjoy this nightmarish election 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/snl-parodied-second-presidential-debate-193243530.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 
 
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/snl-parodied-second-presidential-debate-193243530.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 
 ‘SNL’ parodied the second presidential debate and it wi... 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/snl-parodied-second-presidential-debate-193243530.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 It’s safe to say that the second presidential debate was weird, uncomfortable, 
and almost a spoof of itself. The town hall style…


 
 View on www.yahoo.com 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/snl-parodied-second-presidential-debate-193243530.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 You're losing touch with reality Mikey.  Stock up your bunker, go buy another 
gun, and get ready for the apocalypse.  And, get that manifesto out of your 
head and on paper.  
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 H, maybe she'll be *deleted*.
 
 


 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 1:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   What do you think is the root of prejudice?  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

By the misogynists, sexists and racists (both genders).  This country should 
afford the best in security for her 
You left out *homophobes.*

 From: "emily.mae50@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Re: "There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen 
before. "
.   
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him and they conspire with her campaign, as is revealed in the Wikileaks 
e-mails, they are no longer objectively reporting the news but trying to 
influence an election. This will make it very difficult for Hillary to govern 
even if she is elected. There will be a resistance to her presidency like has 
never been seen before. 
 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Saul Alinsky taught that when you're caught doing something crooked, deny deny 
deny. Then blame your accusers.
 

 Why do you keep saying it's a Saul Alinsky tactic when I've told you now three 
times that it's a *KARL ROVE* tactic?
 

 Here's a real Saul Alinsky tactic from Rules for Radicals, one that Trump has 
been using to great effect:
 

 The job of the organizer is to maneuver and bait the establishment so that it 
will publicly attack him as a 'dangerous enemy.' The hysterical instant 
reaction of the establishment [will] not only validate [the organizer's] 
credentials of competency but also ensure automatic popular invitation.

 

 You know that Rules for Radicals has been used to train community activists 
for the Tea Party, right?
 
 Hillary wrote a 92 page thesis, her senior year, about Saul Alinsky who some 
claim was a *community organizer*
 

 Not just "some," almost everyone. That's because, you know, he was a community 
organizer.
 

 but was actually a crook and a thug.
 

 Documentation, please. (Looks like you got this from D'Souza, right?)
 


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 2:52 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   
 The "delusionals" live in their own dream world.  Interesting to see such mass 
hypnosis.
 
 On 10/16/2016 10:27 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   New York Times, July.
 
 
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" mailto:authfriend@...[FairfieldLife] 
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Yes they have.
 
 

 No, they haven't.
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"  
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 
 

 From: feste37  mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 He is simply unqualified for the office, in any area you care to name. 


 And Hillary is? She put state secrets at risk.
 

 Documentation, please.
 

 Blames the Russians for her E-mails being hacked because she failed to follow 
the law and use government approved E-mail, lied about it and tried to destroy 
evidence in an investigation.
 

 Five lies in a row. There's no evidence that her emails were hacked, so 
there's nothing on that score to blame the Russians for. It has actually been 
the *government-approved" email that was hacked. She didn't lie about her 
emails, and she didn't try to destroy evidence.
 

 She abandoned diplomats in Libya to die and then blamed a video for their 
deaths.
 

 Two more lies.
 

 Set off the greatest mass migration of refugees the world has seen, flooding 
Europe with millions of displaced people.Approved the sale of 1/5 of our 
countries uranium to Russia for a *donation* to the Clinton Foundation.
 

 And another one.
 

 Used money for Haitian earthquake victims for friends of Bill. Pay for play.
 

 And another one.
 

 Lies through her teeth.
 

 And ANOTHER one.
 

 How the F can you believe a word she says? Takes tens of, if not hundreds of 
millions in donations from countries seeking favors, countries that treat their 
women like shit and murder their gay population.
 

 And the Clinton Foundation does all kinds of good with that money.
 

 Wants to open our borders and send our jobs overseas.
 

 Two more lies.
 

 This post is a great example of the Karl Rove tactic of accusing the person 
you oppose of your own misdeeds. Discharge a blizzard of lies about Clinton, 
and finish up by calling *her* a liar.
 

 

 But hey! She'll be the first woman to be president! That must count for 
something!


 From: "Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 2:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   And who told you that? The media?
 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 12:46 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Much of the media is against Trump because he is a terrible candidate -- the 
worst the GOP has put forward in living memory. Of course the media is using 
its influence to persuade people not to vote for him. Nothing illegitimate or 
sinister about that.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes they have.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 

 

 

 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The "delusionals" live in their own dream world.  Interesting to see such mass 
hypnosis.
 

 Yes, a lot of people are wondering how Trump has managed to hypnotize so many 
people into thinking he's presidential material.
 

 

 

 On 10/16/2016 10:27 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   New York Times, July.
 
 
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" mailto:authfriend@...[FairfieldLife] 
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Yes they have.
 
 

 No, they haven't.
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"  
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:mdixon.6569@... wrote :
 
 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 
 

 From: feste37  mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 And Hillary can't be trusted with national secrets. The whole world knows them 
now.
 

 ??? Documentation, please. What "national secrets"?
 

 Since that's all you could come up with, I'll assume you acknowledge I'm right 
about everything I said below, and that your claim about the media is silly 
flapdoodle.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 12:03 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   A couple additional thoughts:
 

 Are all the extremely conservative big-city newspapers that have almost always 
endorsed Republican presidential candidates (some for over a century) but have 
declined to endorse Trump, declaring him unfit for office, conspiring with 
Hillary's campaign?
 

 It's not just the media. I've lost count of the groups of scores of prominent 
or eminent Americans--many of them Republicans---who have signed open letters 
denouncing Trump and, like the newspapers, declaring him unfit for the 
presidency.
 

 And it isn't just his treatment of women. That's actually one of the less 
important objections compared to his ignorance of international affairs, his 
racism, his disregard for the Constitution, his near-constant lying. His 
banana-republic threat to see to it that Hillary is jailed if he's elected 
should all by itself disqualify him from the presidency.
 

 And finally, his attempt to call in question the validity of the 
election--before it's even taken place--is just beyond the pale of acceptable 
behavior by a presidential candidate.
 

 Seems as though you think the media have been "trying to influence the 
election" by reporting all these things. They should have kept quiet about 
them, I guess, and just stuck with dumping on HIllary as they have for decades.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes they have.
 
 

 No, they haven't.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 

 

 

 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 BTW Judy, in July, the New York Times declared it was the duty of the media to 
stop Trump.
 

 You'll have to do better than that. Give me a URL, or a date. Given the way 
you twist things, I'll need to see what the Times actually said.
 

 You also told me earlier last month that Hillary did *not* support open 
borders, Yet Wikileaks revealed E-mails in which she declared to a Brazilian 
bank that she was all for open borders for the western hemisphere.
 

 She didn't mean "open borders" for people to immigrate, sorry. She was talking 
about hemisphere-wide clean energy. Her immigration policy is for increased 
border security, not open borders.
 

 You also told me that Hillary is not a liar but earlier in a post this summer 
you declared that she doesn't lie any more than any other politician. Either 
you don't know what she stands for or you're lying for her. Which is it?
 

 Either you're lying for Trump, or you have a very poor command of English. 
Which is it? A liar is someone who habitually lies; she doesn't.
 
 Yes, the media does conspire with her. They give her veto power over her 
quotes that they want to use and advice about how to help her campaign.
 

 Documentation, please.
 

 How much time has been spent by the media covering the Wikileaks releases?
 

 Oh, lots. The Times has a story almost every day. So does Politico. So does 
WaPo.
 

 Not much because it's bad news for her while they will go to the ends of the 
earth to cover a few women that claim, without proof, to have been *assaulted* 
by Trump and who's stories have been thoroughly discredited.
 

 The media didn't have to go anywhere to find these women; they came out of the 
woodwork of their own accord, enraged, after Trump denied sexually assaulting 
women at the second debate. And *none* of their stories so far has been 
discredited. You keep telling this lie over and over.
 

 How many interviews have they done of Clinton's victims?
 

 You mean "alleged victims." Back when it was relevant, they were interviewed 
to death. We can just go back and look at what they said back then. There's no 
reason to re-interview them. And in any case, Bill Clinton isn't running for 
president, so they're irrelevant.
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 

 

 

 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

A couple additional thoughts: 

 Are all the extremely conservative big-city newspapers that have almost always 
endorsed Republican presidential candidates (some for over a century) but have 
declined to endorse Trump, declaring him unfit for office, conspiring with 
Hillary's campaign?
 

 It's not just the media. I've lost count of the groups of scores of prominent 
or eminent Americans--many of them Republicans---who have signed open letters 
denouncing Trump and, like the newspapers, declaring him unfit for the 
presidency.
 

 And it isn't just his treatment of women. That's actually one of the less 
important objections compared to his ignorance of international affairs, his 
racism, his disregard for the Constitution, his near-constant lying. His 
banana-republic threat to see to it that Hillary is jailed if he's elected 
should all by itself disqualify him from the presidency.
 

 And finally, his attempt to call in question the validity of the 
election--before it's even taken place--is just beyond the pale of acceptable 
behavior by a presidential candidate.
 

 Seems as though you think the media have been "trying to influence the 
election" by reporting all these things. They should have kept quiet about 
them, I guess, and just stuck with dumping on HIllary as they have for decades.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes they have.
 
 

 No, they haven't.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 

 

 

 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Yes they have.
 
 

 No, they haven't.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 

 

 

 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 I notice that "I grope women without their consent" is in quotes, which means 
he actually said those words. Did he? But really, we don't care if he did or 
not. "It's just sex and he can compartmentalize!"  Didn't we establish that 
with Bill Clinton back in the nineties?
 

 Nope.
 

 While Democrats deny the allegations against Bill Clinton, by women who have 
been attacked by Bill, referring to them as tramps and liars, threatening them 
with lawyers and insisting that they are 

 part of the *vast* right wing conspiracy, they're all too quick to admit that 
he has a *problem* keeping his hands off of women. Just not these women. So 
which is it?
 

 Stop painting with such a broad brush. We don't know whether any women have 
been "attacked by Bill," just for one thing. We know a few women have made that 
claim, but there's no solid evidence. We also know *for a fact* that 
right-wingers have been trying to take the Clintons down with false accusations 
ever since they entered public life.
 

 BTW, most of these allegations have been thoroughly shot down
 

 Absolutely not true. None of them have been shot down so far.
 

 and he was a *good* Democrat when he was alleged to have done them and should 
be considered a good, healthy, red blooded, American male, by the standard set 
for Bill Clinton.

 

 Again the broad brush. Makes defending the Trump monster so much easier when 
you make such sweeping statements, but they don't reflect the reality.
 

 
 Don't you know that  Hillary wishes someone would grope her.. just once!


 Stay classy, Mike. Just like your candidate.
 

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 8:32 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Which is It?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?

2016-10-16 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Feste, it is rigged. When the media openly declares it is their duty to 
stop him
 

 They haven't done that.
 

 and they conspire with her campaign,
 

 They haven't done that either.
 

 as is revealed in the Wikileaks e-mails, they are no longer objectively 
reporting the news but trying to influence an election. This will make it very 
difficult for Hillary to govern even if she is elected.
 

 Of course it's going to be very difficult for Hillary to govern. But not 
because the media have conspired with her campaign. It'll be very difficult for 
her to govern because of reflexive GOP resistance and the spreading of lies 
about her and about the media by the right wing, as well as the lies Trump will 
continue to spread about the election being "rigged" after she's in the White 
House.
 

 

 

 There will be a resistance to her presidency like has never been seen before. 

 
 


 From: feste37 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:14 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Which is It?
 
 
   Even though he seems certain to lose, I am still worried, because he is 
angry and unhinged and could cause a lot of trouble between now and Election 
Day, and also afterwards. He is openly saying the election is rigged, which is 
very dangerous. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Putin Preparing for World War?

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Er, John, I believe you meant to address this to Bhairitu, since I'm obviously 
very well aware of it. Bhairitu's the one who thinks it's "so 1950s" to 
distrust Russia.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

 

 Judy,
 

 You'll have to understand that the Russians are playing a dangerous game of 
political chess with the world and not only with Americans.  In the end, their 
objective is power and money.
 

 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

 

 Bhairitu,
 

 My intent was to present interesting news developments in the world, 
regardless of the source.   Assuming that the news is correct, one has to 
wonder why Putin is recalling his people home.  It's probably far fetch to 
assume that he's doing it all to affect the American election and to tacitly 
support Trump.  So, why is he calling his people home?
 

 Why is it far-fetched? The article is clear enough that Putin wants Trump to 
win:
 

 The report comes as a key ally of Putin's warned that Americans should vote 
for Donald Trump as president next month or risk being dragged into a nuclear 
war.
 Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a flamboyant veteran lawmaker known for his fiery 
rhetoric, told Reuters in an interview 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-ally-vote-trump/2016/10/13/id/753297/ 
that Trump was the only person able to de-escalate dangerous tensions between 
Moscow and Washington.
 


 By contrast, Trump's Democratic rival Hillary Clinton could spark World War 
Three, said Zhirinovsky, who received a top state award from Putin after his 
pro-Kremlin Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) came third in Russia's 
parliamentary election last month.
 Does Putin have an inside scoop on Trump?  Or, does he think Trump is clueless 
in dealing with international affairs?  Thus, Putin will step in as the "good" 
guy against an "ugly" American.  But beware of the wolf in sheep's clothing.

 Putin knows Trump is clueless in dealing with international affairs. Trump is 
also clueless about who Putin is and what his goals are. Putin wants Trump to 
think he's Trump's friend and ally so he can steer Trump to take actions 
favorable to Russia, believing they're all his own idea.
 At the same time, Putin knows he won't be able to wrap Hillary around his 
little finger; she's a tough cookie who will do what she thinks is best for the 
U.S.
 Of course Putin wants Trump to be president.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 

 Heavens to Betsy, JR!  You quoted a "right-wing" news source!  Mother Superior 
Jooday will give you 50 lashes with her ruler.  Not that Newsmax is wrong and 
sources to some of these stories are from Reuters.  I linked to a similar story 
on NBC News yesterday and they can't surely be "right wing" can they?  After 
all they unabashedly support Hillary.  But then Hillary seems to be to the 
right of Donald Trump.  She's just good at programming her "bots".
 
 Sometimes the concerns of the supposed "right wing" sound like the concerns of 
"left wing" during the Bush administration.  My how times have changed!
 
 On 10/15/2016 12:19 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
   

 

 If that's the case, Putin appears to be backing the wrong candidate.  And, 
Hillary may be correct in saying that the Russians are behind the information 
from WikiLeaks.
 

 Sooner or later, there could be an accident in Syria that could lead to a 
shootout between the US and Russia.  As such, the UN should mandate a no fly 
zone in Aleppo.
 

 

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 

 Of course he's trying to influence the election. And note that this "report" 
is from the extremely right-wing Newsmax. 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:jr_esq@... wrote :
 
 Or, is he trying to influence the American election by  tacitly endorsing 
Trump?
 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, Recalling Russians to 
Motherland 

 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, R... Russian President Vladimir 
Putin could be prepping for new world war as relations with the United States 
and other Western countries continue to disintegrate, accor...



 View on www.newsmax.com 
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Putin Preparing for World War?

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

 

 Bhairitu,
 

 My intent was to present interesting news developments in the world, 
regardless of the source.   Assuming that the news is correct, one has to 
wonder why Putin is recalling his people home.  It's probably far fetch to 
assume that he's doing it all to affect the American election and to tacitly 
support Trump.  So, why is he calling his people home?
 

 Why is it far-fetched? The article is clear enough that Putin wants Trump to 
win:
 

 The report comes as a key ally of Putin's warned that Americans should vote 
for Donald Trump as president next month or risk being dragged into a nuclear 
war.
 Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a flamboyant veteran lawmaker known for his fiery 
rhetoric, told Reuters in an interview 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-ally-vote-trump/2016/10/13/id/753297/ 
that Trump was the only person able to de-escalate dangerous tensions between 
Moscow and Washington.
 


 By contrast, Trump's Democratic rival Hillary Clinton could spark World War 
Three, said Zhirinovsky, who received a top state award from Putin after his 
pro-Kremlin Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) came third in Russia's 
parliamentary election last month.
 Does Putin have an inside scoop on Trump?  Or, does he think Trump is clueless 
in dealing with international affairs?  Thus, Putin will step in as the "good" 
guy against an "ugly" American.  But beware of the wolf in sheep's clothing.

 Putin knows Trump is clueless in dealing with international affairs. Trump is 
also clueless about who Putin is and what his goals are. Putin wants Trump to 
think he's Trump's friend and ally so he can steer Trump to take actions 
favorable to Russia, believing they're all his own idea.
 At the same time, Putin knows he won't be able to wrap Hillary around his 
little finger; she's a tough cookie who will do what she thinks is best for the 
U.S.
 Of course Putin wants Trump to be president.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 

 Heavens to Betsy, JR!  You quoted a "right-wing" news source!  Mother Superior 
Jooday will give you 50 lashes with her ruler.  Not that Newsmax is wrong and 
sources to some of these stories are from Reuters.  I linked to a similar story 
on NBC News yesterday and they can't surely be "right wing" can they?  After 
all they unabashedly support Hillary.  But then Hillary seems to be to the 
right of Donald Trump.  She's just good at programming her "bots".
 
 Sometimes the concerns of the supposed "right wing" sound like the concerns of 
"left wing" during the Bush administration.  My how times have changed!
 
 On 10/15/2016 12:19 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
   

 

 If that's the case, Putin appears to be backing the wrong candidate.  And, 
Hillary may be correct in saying that the Russians are behind the information 
from WikiLeaks.
 

 Sooner or later, there could be an accident in Syria that could lead to a 
shootout between the US and Russia.  As such, the UN should mandate a no fly 
zone in Aleppo.
 

 

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 

 Of course he's trying to influence the election. And note that this "report" 
is from the extremely right-wing Newsmax. 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:jr_esq@... wrote :
 
 Or, is he trying to influence the American election by  tacitly endorsing 
Trump?
 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, Recalling Russians to 
Motherland 

 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, R... Russian President Vladimir 
Putin could be prepping for new world war as relations with the United States 
and other Western countries continue to disintegrate, accor...



 View on www.newsmax.com 
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Putin Preparing for World War?

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Bhairitu, this is an idiotic line of attack. When you have to make stuff up out 
of whole cloth to throw at those who don't agree with you, it's a really good 
sign you have no arguments. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 BTW, I'm wondering why Mother Superior didn't shame Emily when she posted an 
opinion piece yesterday from Dr. Rosenthal though from the TMO was originally 
on FoxNews?  Big oopsie!
 
 On 10/15/2016 12:19 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
   

 

 If that's the case, Putin appears to be backing the wrong candidate.  And, 
Hillary may be correct in saying that the Russians are behind the information 
from WikiLeaks.
 

 Sooner or later, there could be an accident in Syria that could lead to a 
shootout between the US and Russia.  As such, the UN should mandate a no fly 
zone in Aleppo.
 

 

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 

 Of course he's trying to influence the election. And note that this "report" 
is from the extremely right-wing Newsmax. 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:jr_esq@... wrote :
 
 Or, is he trying to influence the American election by  tacitly endorsing 
Trump?
 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, Recalling Russians to 
Motherland 

 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, R... Russian President Vladimir 
Putin could be prepping for new world war as relations with the United States 
and other Western countries continue to disintegrate, accor...



 View on www.newsmax.com 
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] One Question

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 (snip)
 
 Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who has a 
liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that source is 
correct.  Shame on that troll!
 

 Not true, Bhairitu.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Feste (And Me)

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

There are oogobs of reasons to fear Trump's election, including (but not
limited to) his threat to "tighten up" libel laws and sue the media when he
doesn't like what they say about him.

There's zero evidence that either Carlos Slim or Jeff Bezos has attempted to
slant the WaPo's or the NYTimes' coverage of the candidates. That's just silly
right-wing dithering.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

What is more shocking than Donald Trump is the unabashed media bias from the
big media companies bashing Trump and supporting Hillary. My guess is they
fear that if Donald gets in he'll start breaking up their monopolies. Now
that's not exactly "right wing" is it? In fact it's been the left over the
years who have criticized this control of our media by a few companies and now
a few oligarchs.

Carlos Slim, a Mexican oligarch, owns the New York Times. So he probably fears
Trump taking away his new pet toy. Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, now owns
the Washington Post and he probably fear the Donald taking away his new pet
toy. So should we be surprised their lap dogs, fearing loss of their jobs, are
required to favor Hillary.

Here's an example of how controlled the media has become. If I could take
this clip back to the 1950s and show it to the man of the street they'd be
shocked and claim that "the communists have taken over America!" Ain't the
communism though it's fascism. Whoopi Goldberg is questioning in a
non-partisan way what is going on with the media. See what happens:

http://investmentwatchblog.com/whoopie-goldberg-on-the-view-cut-off-mid-sentence-by-producers-when-questioning-the-timing-of-all-these-charges-against-trump-and-saying-it-was-very-dangerous-to-ask-these-questions-and-we-are-n/

Entire segment here and you'll hear Whoopi's mike get cut out just like they
would do in a fascist regime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQetDbvApUo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQetDbvApUo

This is appalling in a country that has long favored free speech. I think we
have Civil War 2.0 ahead though they may attempt to preempt it with WW III.

On 10/14/2016 11:10 PM, hepa7@... mailto:hepa7@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

Donnie wins, Hillary steals??

HILLARY STEALS THIS ELECTION, 2016 LOOKS GRIM. BIBLE CODE REVEALS MORE

HILLARY STEALS THIS ELECTION, 2016 LOOKS ... SO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHO WINS THE
ELECTION? i told you months ago this would happenINCREDIBLE DETAILS ENCODED
3200 years ago in...

View on www.youtube.com
Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Putin Preparing for World War?

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Heavens to Betsy, JR!  You quoted a "right-wing" news source!  Mother Superior 
Jooday will give you 50 lashes with her ruler.
 

 Nothing wrong with quoting a right-wing news source as long as its bias is 
taken into account.
 

 Not that Newsmax is wrong and sources to some of these stories are from 
Reuters.  I linked to a similar story on NBC News yesterday and they can't 
surely be "right wing" can they?
 

 Nobody's saying the story isn't true; it's a matter of how it's spun (as you 
know). Newsmax is spinning it to encourage votes for Trump.
 

 

 

 After all they unabashedly support Hillary.  But then Hillary seems to be to 
the right of Donald Trump.  She's just good at programming her "bots".

 
 Sometimes the concerns of the supposed "right wing" sound like the concerns of 
"left wing" during the Bush administration.  My how times have changed!
 
 On 10/15/2016 12:19 AM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
   

 

 If that's the case, Putin appears to be backing the wrong candidate.  And, 
Hillary may be correct in saying that the Russians are behind the information 
from WikiLeaks.
 

 Sooner or later, there could be an accident in Syria that could lead to a 
shootout between the US and Russia.  As such, the UN should mandate a no fly 
zone in Aleppo.
 

 

 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:authfriend@... wrote :
 

 Of course he's trying to influence the election. And note that this "report" 
is from the extremely right-wing Newsmax. 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:jr_esq@... wrote :
 
 Or, is he trying to influence the American election by  tacitly endorsing 
Trump?
 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, Recalling Russians to 
Motherland 

 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, R... Russian President Vladimir 
Putin could be prepping for new world war as relations with the United States 
and other Western countries continue to disintegrate, accor...



 View on www.newsmax.com 
 Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

(snip)

There is no evidence that Trump did any of these allegations, just last minute
accusations at the end of a political campaign that Democrats are famous for.
In fact, the first woman to make the accusations has been totally discredited
with her lies and a witness that was there.

Turns out this "witness" is not even a tiny bit credible. You really, really
wouldn't want me to post this sleazebag's history, but I will if you keep
citing his "testimony."

BTW, that woman is borderline *ugly*, at least compared to the women in
Trump's life. If Trump had a *boner* like Obama was exhibiting on Air-force One
to the ladies, he probably would have lost it when he saw her.

Stay classy, Mike.

From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

I've heard that talk can get pretty crude and often does in the estrogen
filled locker rooms. :-D

The fascist media coverage of the Presidential campaign is very Shakespearean:
much ado about nothing.

Character - it actually counts for something. It's not about the 'talk'
anymore, Bhari, it's about the actions and the corruptness behind the actions.
You trivialize something that is not trivial. Trump believes he has the right
to violate others. He believes himself justified in taking whatever he wants.
You simply don't get it. You need to work on that.

On 10/14/2016 10:30 AM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... mailto:mdixon.6569@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

Bill's accusers came forward immediately. Trumps, as many as thirty years
later in the middle of a political campaign with media bending over backwards,
trying to discredit him. Hillary can't win on merit or accomplishments and has
high negativity rating. All she can do is find a way to make Trump look more
negative than her.
Locker room talk dude! I don't know, maybe you haven't been around many men in
a testosterone filled environment. Can get pretty crude at times and usually
does.

From: feste37 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

I think it's glaringly obvious to anyone. In Trump world, Bill's accusers
are, of course, to be believed, but those who accuse Trump of similar things
are "horrible liars." He omits to note of course, that he himself said that he
did those things to women. So they are merely confirming the truth of his
words.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote :

So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the
hell?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Coming forward doesn't mean going *public*.

(horselaugh) Oh. Well, OK, if "coming forward" no longer means "going public,"
but rather "told friends about it," many of Trump's accusers did exactly that
shortly, or immediately, after their encounter with Trump.

You can't have your cake and eat it too, sorry.

Juanita Broaderrick had witnesses that saw her ripped panty hose and swollen
lip right after the attack.

And she attended a Clinton fundraiser three weeks later. Also submitted an
affidavit in the Paula Jones case denying Clinton had made any sexual advances.
She later recanted her denial when she was asked by the FBI.

The Courts ordered Clinton to pay Paula Jones around $800,000 dollars.

Nope. Clinton offered to settle the suit for $850,000, and she accepted.

From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Bill's accusers came forward immediately.

Not true.

Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones didn't go public for five years. Juanita
Broaddrick, for 20 years.

Most of Trump's accusers came out much less than 30 years later.

Trumps, as many as thirty years later in the middle of a political campaign
with media bending over backwards, trying to discredit him. Hillary can't win
on merit or accomplishments and has high negativity rating. All she can do is
find a way to make Trump look more negative than her.

Locker room talk dude! I don't know, maybe you haven't been around many men in
a testosterone filled environment. Can get pretty crude at times and usually
does.

From: feste37
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: For Feste (And Me)

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Dear Doug, It's OK, you can use my name and attack me directly instead of Card.
Be brave! We could actually have a discussion, you know. Card hasn't been
fighting with anybody; it's not right to attack him when you're really angry
with me.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Dear Card, were I an Am football referee I should catch up and throw a penalty
flag at you, or in other sport give you a yellow card, or some measure of sport
time out for ‘sticking’ in your ‘piling on’ with this recent post you have
given us here on FFL, a spiritual Yahoo-group community,.

Here we have members who are openly down, declaring they are suffering, “I've
suffered..” with an evident spiritual aggravation in this thread.. We had
another one leave recently over unnecessary roughness.

Then in this boxing post with its subject heading and opening line appears
something like not just clenching in boxing, punching kidneys whilst you gots a
grip on them, but more nearly as striking them as they are going down or a
piling on as would be in Am football.

With this kind of posting, contending hurt of people, the next thing we will
see is someone more reactive maybe with less self-moderation here coming in
here giving us 67 mundane posts fighting contending ‘..is not a thief’,
name-calling ‘Card-poo..You are a liar’. Then we’ll have someone new coming to
read the community wonder it all needs moderation.

As one moderator of Yahoo-group civility I would ask, in those words of
Jonathan Winter’s in The Russians are Coming, “Let’s get organized here..”
“Why can’t we just get along?” I should ask that we collectively reach for
kindness and self-moderation in the posting here in fellowship of sharing with
members of the FFL group. JaiGuruYou.

Feste confesses, I've suffered from Trump Anxiety for months,”

Back_formore adds..”I can certainly relate.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/10/13/people-are-so-stressed-by-this-election-that-the-american-psychological-association-has-coping-tips/

The Russians are coming https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WBp2vodDTk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WBp2vodDTk

The Russians are coming https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WBp2vodDTk A piece
from my favorite movie.

View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WBp2vodDTk
Preview by Yahoo

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Donnie wins, Hillary steals??

HILLARY STEALS THIS ELECTION, 2016 LOOKS GRIM. BIBLE CODE REVEALS MORE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmqpvcMFmzM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmqpvcMFmzM

HILLARY STEALS THIS ELECTION, 2016 LOOKS ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmqpvcMFmzM SO YOU WANT TO KNOW WHO WINS THE
ELECTION? i told you months ago this would happenINCREDIBLE DETAILS ENCODED
3200 years ago in...

View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmqpvcMFmzM
Preview by Yahoo

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-15 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

Bill's accusers came forward immediately.

Not true.

Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones didn't go public for five years. Juanita
Broaddrick, for 20 years.

Most of Trump's accusers came out much less than 30 years later.

Locker room talk dude! I don't know, maybe you haven't been around many men in
a testosterone filled environment. Can get pretty crude at times and usually
does.

From: feste37
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Putin Preparing for World War?

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Of course he's trying to influence the election. And note that this "report" is 
from the extremely right-wing Newsmax. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Or, is he trying to influence the American election by  tacitly endorsing 
Trump?
 

 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, Recalling Russians to 
Motherland 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 
 
 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 
 Report: Putin Possibly Readying for World War, R... 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 Russian President Vladimir Putin could be prepping for new world war as 
relations with the United States and other Western countries continue to 
disintegrate, accor...


 
 View on www.newsmax.com 
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/putin-preparing-for-global/2016/10/13/id/753319/
 Preview by Yahoo

[FairfieldLife] Re: CIA Prepping for Cyber Attack on Russia

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Probably the kind of idiots who won't do anything that would lead to the whole 
Internet becoming unreliable. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Oh great! You think that Yahoo has problems now just wait because if 
 this starts the whole Internet will become unreliable. And people with 
 be pissed! What kind of idiots do we have running US government?
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cia-prepping-possible-cyber-strike-against-russia-n36
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cia-prepping-possible-cyber-strike-against-russia-n36
 
 Note the mainstream news source. It's not a conspiracy theory.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fwd: Snopes

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

This must be a really old article. There has been no mystery about who runs the
site since I started using it many years ago.

About snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

About snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp The snopes.com website
was founded by David Mikkelson, who lives and works in the Los Angeles area.

View on www.snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp
Preview by Yahoo

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :

-Original Message-
From: Don Loos
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Sent: Fri, Oct 14, 2016 7:12 pm
Subject: Fwd: Snopes

DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ ON sNOPES!

Snopes Got Snoped

http://worldtruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/549519_400684293325790_831357802_n.jpg
Snopes is run by a man and a woman with no background in investigation using
Google. Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any
comment, claim and email. Once negative article by them and people point and
say, "See, I told you it wasn't true!" But what is Snopes? What are their
methods and training that gives them the authority to decide what is true and
what is not? For several years people have tried to find out who exactly was
behind the website Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it.
Are you ready for this? It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no
big office of investigators scouring public records in Washington, no
researchers studying historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers
reaching a consensus on current caselaw. No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop
operation that was started by two people who have absolutely no formal
background or experience in investigative research.
http://worldtruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/102210_1614_somuchforsn11.png
David and Barbara Mikkelson pictured above; are from San Fernando Valley of
California. They started their website 'Snopes' about 13 years ago. After a
few years it began gaining popularity as people believed it to be unbiased and
neutral. But over the past couple of years people started asking questions when
'Snopes' was proven wrong in a number of their conclusions. There were also
criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the
'true' bottom of various issues, but rather asserting their beliefs in
controversial issues.
In 2008, State Farm agent Bud Gregg hoisted a political sign in Mandeville,
Louisiana referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet.
The Mikkelson's were quick to "research" this issue and post their condemnation
of it on Snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of
State Farm pressured Mr. Gregg into taking down the sign. In fact, nothing of
the sort ever took place. A friend of Mr. Gregg personally contacted David
Mikkelson to alert him of the factual inacuracy, leaving him Mr. Gregg's
contact phone numbers. Mr. Mikkelson was told that Mr. Gregg would give him the
phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would inform them
that they had never pressured Mr. Gregg to take down his sign.
But the Mikkelson's never called Mr. Gregg. In fact, Mr. Gregg found out that
no one from Snopes.com had ever contacted any one with State Farm. Yet,
Snopes.com has kept their false story of Mr. Gregg up to this day, as the
"final factual word" on the issue.

What is behind Snopes' selfish motivation? A simple review of their
"fact-checking" reveals a strong tendency to explain away criticisms towards
liberal politicians and public figures while giving conservatives the hatchet
job. Religious stories and issues are similarly shown no mercy. With the
"main-stream" media quickly losing all credibility with their fawning treatment
of President Obama, Snopes is being singled out, along with MSNBC and others,
as being particularly biased and agenda-modivated.
So if you really want to know the truth about a story or a rumor you have
heard, by all means do not go to Snopes.com! You could do just as well if you
were a liberal with an internet connection. Don't go to wikipedia.com
http://wikipedia.com either as their team of amateur editors have also been
caught in a number of bold-faced liberal-biased untruths. (Such as Wikigate
http://www.redstate.com/bs/2009/12/20/climate-cultist-william-connolley-sabotages-wikipedia/
and their religious treatment of Obama
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/17/andy-martin-wikipedia-is_n_396003.html.)
Take anything these sites say with a grain of salt and an understanding that
they are written by people with a motive to criticize all things conservative.
Use them only to lead you to solid references where you can read their sources
for yourself.

Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now
seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do.

[FairfieldLife] Re: One Question

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Just found another mention of this, in an article in TheAtlantic.com:
 

 One spectacular irony in all of this is how Trump’s tactics mirror the 
criticism he’s lobbed at his opponent. In the second presidential debate, he 
claimed Hillary Clinton “attacked” the women who accused her husband of sexual 
assault, “and attacked them viciously.” Hillary Clinton has defended her 
husband, but there’s little evidence 
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/10/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-viciously-attack/
 to support Trump’s broader claim.

 

 Donald Trump’s Warning for Women 
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trumps-warning-for-women/504251/
 
 
 Donald Trump’s Warning for Women 
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trumps-warning-for-women/504251/
 The Republican nominee is doubling down on his attacks against those who have 
accused him of sexual assault.
 
 
 
 View on www.theatlantic.com 
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/donald-trumps-warning-for-women/504251/
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 
 You're right. It hadn't occurred to me--I guess because it was so obvious--but 
Parton's column is the only place I've seen the point made explicitly. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Heather Digby Parton made the point in an article on Salon today, after 
quoting Trump:
 

 That's right, the same man who staged a televised stunt just four days ago in 
which he sanctimoniously slammed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary 
Clinton for supposedly trashing the reputations of assault victims, stood 
before the cameras and trashed the reputations of assault victims.

 

 Thanks for that, Judy. It is such a simple observation to make I was wondering 
why it wasn't being used constantly as this whole sordid drama plays out.
 

 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s conspiratorial ranting 
and Michelle Obama’s inspiring call for decency 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 
 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 
 Two speeches that defined a campaign: Donald Trump’s... 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Trump's dog-whistle diatribe was this campaign's darkest hour, while Michelle 
Obama's speech was its finest


 
 View on www.salon.com 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/two-speeches-that-defined-a-campaign-donald-trumps-conspiratorial-ranting-and-michelle-obamas-inspiring-call-for-decency/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 So, how is Trump's besmirching of his female accusers any different or better 
or more justified than Hillary's alleged attacks against Bill Clinton's 
accusers? Does Trump not realize he's doing the exact same thing he accuses his 
opponent of? I haven't seen this point made anywhere in the media yet. What the 
hell?
 

 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/14/look-at-her-i-dont-think-so-trumps-defence-is-to-demean-his-accusers

[FairfieldLife] Re: Yet another woman groped by Trump...oh wait, that's not a woman...

2016-10-14 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

Two more actual women have come out with stories of Trump groping them: 

 Two more women say Donald Trump sexually assaulted them: “It was very random, 
very nonchalant” 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
 
 
 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
 
 
 Two more women say Donald Trump sexually assaulted ... 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
 When Donald Trump said he could just "grab a woman by the" crotch, he may have 
meant more than he said VIDEO
 
 
 
 View on www.salon.com 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :


 
 Rudy Guliani is one of Trump's closest advisors. Here is one of their first 
encounters. 

Rudy Giuliani in Drag Smooching Donald Trump 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be
 
 Rudy Giuliani in Drag Smooching Donald Trump 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be Yes, it's former 
NYC mayor Rody Giuliani in drag having his "breasts" shamelessly violated by 
"Apprentice" tycoon Donald Trump. Clip from ne...


 
 View on www.youtube.com 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IrE6FMpai8=youtu.be 
 Preview by Yahoo

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

1 - 100 of 1336 matches

Mail list logo