[Flightgear-devel] old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Erik Hofman



Hi,

How would you all feel about making the old Haris' 3d clouds code 
obsolete by now?


Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Erik Hofman wrote

 
 Hi,
 
 How would you all feel about making the old Haris' 3d clouds code
 obsolete by now?
 
 Erik
 

Supported

Regards,

Vivian



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Erik Hofman -- Monday 13 June 2005 10:29:
 How would you all feel about making the old Haris' 3d clouds code 
 obsolete by now?

Probably a good idea. The old code is broken, unmaintained, and uses nasty
binary cloud definition files, while the new code yields much better results
(except when flying through clouds). The old code may be more advanced in
some respect (and slower :-), but it'll remain in the Attic/ anyway, so if
someone wants to pick it up again, fix it, and make it better than the new
clouds, go ahead ...

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] xml formatting

2005-06-13 Thread eagle monart


i am trying to output a airspeed and gmt  with generic protocol. i am 
writing it to a txt file however the file is growing. i wanted xml form to 
rewrite on to same line as an example line1 is gmt and  line two is airspeed 
..format is like that. i subtracted line seperators in xml form but still 
continues to write new datas. how can i set this?


?xml version=1.0?
PropertyList
generic
 output

  chunk
   nametime GMT (hhmmss)/name
   typestring/type
   node/fdm/acms/sim/time/node
  /chunk

  chunk
   nameindicated speed (kt)/name
   typeint/type
   node/fdm/acms/velocities/airspeed-kt/node
  /chunk


 /output
/generic
/PropertyList

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] New developer

2005-06-13 Thread Manuel Bessler
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 02:11:55AM +, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
 On June 13, 2005 12:42 am, Manuel Bessler wrote:
  The stuff is still here:
  1. http://cockpit.varxec.de/fgfs/fgfs_717-200.tar.bz2
  2. http://cockpit.varxec.de/fgfs/fgfs_717-200_71.blend.gz
 
 They are not there.

Ooops, my bad.

(My old server redirects to my new server, but the files are only on the
old one...)

I've put them on my new server:
http://cockpit.varxec.net/fgfs/fgfs_717-200.tar.bz2
http://cockpit.varxec.net/fgfs/fgfs_717-200_71.blend.gz
http://cockpit.varxec.net/fgfs/fgfs-screen-001.jpg
   ...
http://cockpit.varxec.net/fgfs/fgfs-screen-005.jpg

The screens show the state of the 3d model.


Regards,
Manuel

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] xml formatting

2005-06-13 Thread Erik Hofman

eagle monart wrote:


i am trying to output a airspeed and gmt  with generic protocol. i am 
writing it to a txt file however the file is growing. i wanted xml form 
to rewrite on to same line as an example line1 is gmt and  line two is 
airspeed ..format is like that. i subtracted line seperators in xml form 
but still continues to write new datas. how can i set this?


This is how it was designed since it's main purpose was sending data to 
the serial port or over the network. The file option (as it is now) is 
very useful for generating log files, so it is not possible to do it 
like that at this time.


Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] New JSBSim Branch

2005-06-13 Thread Jon Berndt
It appears as though JSBSim CVS is in a good state, with the new code, and new 
directory
structure.

Notes:

1) No attempt has yet been made to test this with FlightGear - that will take a 
little bit
of work. Things are different: the directory structure, the code, the aircraft 
config
files, etc.

2) I have only attempted to build this under Cygwin and Borland C++BuilderX.

3) Some aircraft, engine, script, etc. files have not been validated against 
the new
config spec.

4) Documentation for the new spec is forthcoming.

5) More information on the converter is pending.

Jon


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  10:29 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
 
 Hi,
 
 How would you all feel about making the old Haris' 3d clouds code 
 obsolete by now?
 
 Erik
 
We must keep it, with Metar it is the most Representative of the real
weather the new 3D clouds is beautiful only. 
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 12:21:
 Le lundi 13 juin 2005 à 10:29 +0200, Erik Hofman a écrit :
  How would you all feel about making the old Haris' 3d clouds code 
  obsolete by now?

 We must keep it, with Metar it is the most Representative of the real
 weather the new 3D clouds is beautiful only. 

Both the old 2D clouds (note the TWO) and the new 3D clouds consider METAR.
The old 3D clouds that Erik is talking about do AFAIK not. They are ugly and
broken, and aren't representative for anything. It sounds as if you are mixing
up 2D and 3D.

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Erik Hofman

Melchior FRANZ wrote:


Both the old 2D clouds (note the TWO) and the new 3D clouds consider METAR.
The old 3D clouds that Erik is talking about do AFAIK not. They are ugly and
broken, and aren't representative for anything. It sounds as if you are mixing
up 2D and 3D.


As far as I know the old 3d clouds do not use metar for anything. In 
fact it just shows the same cloudfield over and over again.


Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  12:58 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a crit :
 * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 12:21:
  Le lundi 13 juin 2005  10:29 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
   How would you all feel about making the old Haris' 3d clouds code 
   obsolete by now?
 
  We must keep it, with Metar it is the most Representative of the real
  weather the new 3D clouds is beautiful only. 
 
 Both the old 2D clouds (note the TWO) and the new 3D clouds consider 
 METAR.
 The old 3D clouds that Erik is talking about do AFAIK not. They are ugly and
 broken, and aren't representative for anything. It sounds as if you are mixing
 up 2D and 3D.
 
 m.
 
 Oh sorry if you mean _bumped_ clouds it can be removed. We must be able
to choose between normal clouds and new 3D clouds, because, with Metar,
when i look at the windows (you probably can do it :-)  ), 
i worry, i see a  sky which is nearly the same than that i have on my
screen, 
and an other sky with new 3D clouds.
I do not contest that new 3D Clouds takes in account Metar, up to now,
it is not able to give the real picture. (that could be probably
improved).

You could understand that i must, now, be careful when i give my
opinion, since the _JSB_crash_handling_affair_ which makes for me crash
down many hours of work.( to keep it i must run with a permanent patched
fg). But i get off the main subject... OK!!

 
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  13:05 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
 Melchior FRANZ wrote:
 
  Both the old 2D clouds (note the TWO) and the new 3D clouds consider 
  METAR.
  The old 3D clouds that Erik is talking about do AFAIK not. They are ugly and
  broken, and aren't representative for anything. It sounds as if you are 
  mixing
  up 2D and 3D.
 
 As far as I know the old 3d clouds do not use metar for anything. In 
 fact it just shows the same cloudfield over and over again.
 
 Erik
 
 OK i understand what you mean, i haver used it.

-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: old 3d clouds code

2005-06-13 Thread Erik Hofman

Gerard Robin wrote:


 Oh sorry if you mean _bumped_ clouds it can be removed.


Eh, no. It's yet another one...

Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: animation bug

2005-06-13 Thread Jim Wilson
 From: Jim Wilson
 
 Hi Melchior,
 
 There was one thing I forgot to mention.  In that animation.diff patch file 
 you also have an unrelated change that does some
 clamping in the material animation.   I understand the logic behind this,  
 but the typical behavior (the way the translationn
 values are handled further down the line) is the texture wraps at  1.0 and  
 0.0.  IIRC, this behavior is essential in some
 of the 747 panel stuff.
 
 I haven't tested this myself,  but thought I'd give you a heads up in case 
 there's a problem lurking in that particular change.
 

Err umm...looks like I got the wrong idea with trans.min/trans.max...mixed 
up transparency and translation.  Throw in transformations and I'm really 
confused!  Sorry about that. :-)

Best,

Jim



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Call to French community about Airport LFPO

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Airport LFPO -Paris Orly gives a bad runway position.
The defined take-off point is outside of the visual runway position.
I dont know if the error is in the Airport data.
Does anybody has tried  to modify it  ?

Thanks
 
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] xml formatting

2005-06-13 Thread Erik Hofman

Erik Hofman wrote:

eagle monart wrote:



i am trying to output a airspeed and gmt  with generic protocol. i am 
writing it to a txt file however the file is growing. i wanted xml 
form to rewrite on to same line as an example line1 is gmt and  line 
two is airspeed ..format is like that. i subtracted line seperators in 
xml form but still continues to write new datas. how can i set this?



This is how it was designed since it's main purpose was sending data to 
the serial port or over the network. The file option (as it is now) is 
very useful for generating log files, so it is not possible to do it 
like that at this time.


However, you might want to add 
line_separatorcarriagereturn/line_separator to see if that helps.


If it doesn't work either it would be possible to add a specialized 
line-separator that performs a fseek(0) just prior to writing the line.


Erik

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] OpenAL for CygWin

2005-06-13 Thread Jon Berndt
 Hmmm ... we had to fiddle with it to make it work some months ago ... I
 forget exactly what we did

This seems really unfortunate for FlightGear - that we have to rely on another 
package
where some of us have to fix the code to work for CygWin users. Is this even 
documented
anywhere?

jon


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] OpenAL for CygWin

2005-06-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jon Berndt

 
  Hmmm ... we had to fiddle with it to make it work some months ago ... I
  forget exactly what we did
 
 This seems really unfortunate for FlightGear - that we have to rely on
 another package
 where some of us have to fix the code to work for CygWin users. Is this
 even documented
 anywhere?
 
In the developers' list archives is the best we have. Cygwin wouldn't work
at all if it were not for the excellent work by Norman Vine. There's no sign
of OpenAL being ported to Cygwin at the moment, so this is the best we have.
We are in constant danger of being left behind.

Have you got it to work yet??? I guess I could tarball up my version here
for you, when I have a bit more time.

V.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Something wrong ?
in fgfsrc in have:

--geometry=1280x896
--enable-real-weather-fetch
--timeofday=afternoon
--prop:/nasal/local/script=![CDATA[  INIT = func {  setprop
(/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size, 4096);  }  ]]


nasal does give error message:  Nasal parse error: parse error in /nasal
[0]/local[0], line 1

does writing --prop:/nasal.  good

-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] OpenAL for CygWin

2005-06-13 Thread Jon Berndt
 In the developers' list archives is the best we have. Cygwin wouldn't work
 at all if it were not for the excellent work by Norman Vine. There's no sign
 of OpenAL being ported to Cygwin at the moment, so this is the best we have.
 We are in constant danger of being left behind.

 Have you got it to work yet??? I guess I could tarball up my version here
 for you, when I have a bit more time.

Yes. I now have a FlightGear executable - though I won't have time to try it 
until this
evening at the earliest.

I'd like to submit the text below to a FAQ or wherever it should be on the
FlightGear/SimGear site:

--- start ---

For Cygwin users, OpenAL needs to be retrieved from this site:

ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/openal_cyg.tgz

I placed this file in the /usr directory and untar'ed it, though some place it 
in the
/usr/local/ directory tree - which might be more appropriate. Some library and 
dll files
are untar'ed into your bin/ and lib/ subdirectories.

Once the files are untar'ed, you must cd to the include/AL/ subdirectory and 
modify all
the files where _WIN32 is present (use grep) and change it to simply WIN32 
(that is,
remove the underscore). Also, in alc.h you must change the code at top to look 
like this:

#ifdef WIN32  --- CHANGE TO THIS
 #ifdef _OPENAL32LIB
  #define ALCAPI __declspec(dllexport)
 #else
  #define ALCAPI __declspec(dllimport)
 #endif

#ifdef WIN32 --- CHANGE TO THIS
 typedef struct ALCdevice_struct ALCdevice;
 typedef struct ALCcontext_struct ALCcontext;
#endif

Once these changes are made, you should be able to compile simgear.

--- end ---

Jon


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Andy Ross
Gerard Robin wrote:
 Something wrong ?

 --prop:/nasal/local/script=![CDATA[  INIT = func {  setprop
 (/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size, 4096);  }  ]]

 nasal does give error message:  Nasal parse error: parse error in /nasal
 [0]/local[0], line 1

The --prop argument is not an XML parser.  Just pass the literal
script text as the value, no CDATA munging is needed or legal.

Note also that the script you list above is a noop.  It assigns a INIT
function as a local variable but never calls it.  If you want to set
the /sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size to 4096, what is wrong with:

   --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096

Andy

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] YASim turbo/supercharger issues

2005-06-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Some time ago I wrote:
 
 Andy Ross:
 
   If you do mean this equation then I can certainly live with that. If
   not, I'll need to put my thinking cap on ... I've updated the
   graphical representation here:
 
  Remind me again which one of these is the real engine data, and what
  the source is?  The only line on this graph that has the dropoff seems
  to be the polynomial you posted.  The others (including the linear
  one) all have better agreement, qualitatively.  We can play with other
  forms too, like c((x+1)^e - 1) (for some e  1, and with a c that makes
  the
  slope through the origin ~ 1).
 
 
 The real data is series 1, but only up to rpm-normalised = 1. For values
 above 1, it's just a continuation by eye of the data.
 
 (See http://www.turbotechnics.com/supercharger/expo.htm Note that max
 power
 is at 6500 rpm, and that the supercharger output is nearly flat at 7000
 rpm.)
 
 I selected
 
 y = -0.25x^3 + 0.15x^2 + 1.11x
 
 because that had the best fit between 0 and ~ 1.2, which was the region in
 which I was most interested. This was based on the working assumption that
 an engine develops rated power at more or less the full supercharger
 output.
 At the moment, the equation gives a reasonable match to the known
 performance. All the other curves are possibilities; that's why they are
 there :-).
 
 I discarded the linear option because of the lack of tail-off, and the
 other
 polynomial as a poor fit in the operating region. On further
 consideration,
 perhaps the 'ln' solution doesn't tail off quickly enough, although it's a
 very good fit indeed up to ~1.1.
 
 So far as I can see supercharger design and matching it to an engine is as
 much art as science, and there are many different options. I'm reasonably
 convinced that the supercharger output should tail off quite sharply after
 max power, otherwise an engine would just go on developing more and more
 power at higher and higher rpm until it broke or the supercharger did!. In
 practice this doesn't happen because the cross section of the inlet is
 carefully chosen.
 
 I'm sure that you can come up with some more alternatives. Let's try them
 and see if we like them.
 

We seem to have got stuck on this one. I haven't pursued it because the
Hurricane model wasn't ready. A beta version is now ready. It, along with
the Spitfire and P51D need the attached modification to YASim.

The diff provides a supercharger output which varies with engine rpm. It
assumes that the normalized supercharger output is ~ 1 when the engine is at
the nominated peak-power rpm (normalised). A 'power' equation of the form
((A*(B^x))*(x^C)  has been derived empirically from some representative
supercharger data. This provides near-linear output over the normal
operating range, with fall-off in the over-speed situation. It proves an
excellent match to published contemporary figures for the Merlin XX in the
Hurricane II, and should also do so for other Merlin variants. It allows the
engine to over-speed to 2.5 times the nominated peak-power rpm, and will not
break beyond this (although the engine/supercharger probably would in real
life!). Unlikely, but allows an unexpected YASim configuration.

It also provides an additional control - Boost Control Cutout - which
overrides the Boost Control (or wastgate in Yasim). The Spitfire, Hurricane
and P51D all had this for use in combat.

Finally, the diff corrects a minor bug in the output to the property tree
and provides a Boost Gauge input.

The beta version of the Hurricane IIB is available here:

ftp://abbeytheatre.dyndns.org/fgfs/Hurricane/

There is a tarball (hurricane.tgz) or you can grab all the files
individually.

The diff is also available there. You WILL need to apply this to run the
Hurricane, but so far as I can tell, no other YASim model is adversely
affected.

Some pictures are here:

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/vmeazza/FlightGear/HurricaneIIb-3.jpg
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/vmeazza/FlightGear/HurricaneIIb-4.jpg
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/vmeazza/FlightGear/HurricaneIIb-5.jpg
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/vmeazza/FlightGear/HurricaneIIb-6.jpg


There remains some more eye-candy to do: nav lights, beam approach marker
lamps, realistic rad and oil temperature readings etc. In the meantime I
would be grateful for any comments, not least that it all downloads and
installs correctly! If you do decide to give it a go you'll probably need
this:

http://home.clara.net/wolverine/BOB/misc/Spit_Hurri_Manuals.zip


Regards

Vivian


yasim.diff
Description: Binary data
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

RE: [Flightgear-devel] writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Gerard Robin asked

 Something wrong ?
 in fgfsrc in have:
 
 --geometry=1280x896
 --enable-real-weather-fetch
 --timeofday=afternoon
 --prop:/nasal/local/script=![CDATA[  INIT = func {  setprop
 (/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size, 4096);  }  ]]
 
 
 nasal does give error message:  Nasal parse error: parse error in /nasal
 [0]/local[0], line 1
 
 does writing --prop:/nasal.  good
 
 

Just do this:

--prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-enable=1
--prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096

V.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  07:13 -0700, Andy Ross a crit :
 --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096

It should work but the program overload the data, only one way the nasal
way

thanks


-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  15:16 +0100, Vivian Meazza a crit :
 Gerard Robin asked
 
  Something wrong ?
  in fgfsrc in have:
  
  --geometry=1280x896
  --enable-real-weather-fetch
  --timeofday=afternoon
  --prop:/nasal/local/script=![CDATA[  INIT = func {  setprop
  (/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size, 4096);  }  ]]
  
  
  nasal does give error message:  Nasal parse error: parse error in /nasal
  [0]/local[0], line 1
  
  does writing --prop:/nasal.  good
  
  
 
 Just do this:
 
 --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-enable=1
 --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096
sorry
Does not work the program overload the data.
thanks
 
 V.
 
 
 
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
 
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Andy Ross
 Andy Ross a crit :
  --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096

 It should work but the program overload the data, only one way the
 nasal way

That sounds like a bug to me.  The command line should be overwriting
anything in the configuration files.  Is the cloud code (over-)writing
this property at initialization time?

Andy

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] OpenAL for CygWin

2005-06-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jon Berndt

 
  In the developers' list archives is the best we have. Cygwin wouldn't
 work
  at all if it were not for the excellent work by Norman Vine. There's no
 sign
  of OpenAL being ported to Cygwin at the moment, so this is the best we
 have.
  We are in constant danger of being left behind.
 
  Have you got it to work yet??? I guess I could tarball up my version
 here
  for you, when I have a bit more time.
 
 Yes. I now have a FlightGear executable - though I won't have time to try
 it until this
 evening at the earliest.
 
 I'd like to submit the text below to a FAQ or wherever it should be on the
 FlightGear/SimGear site:
 
 --- start ---
 
 For Cygwin users, OpenAL needs to be retrieved from this site:
 
 ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/openal_cyg.tgz
 
 I placed this file in the /usr directory and untar'ed it, though some
 place it in the
 /usr/local/ directory tree - which might be more appropriate. Some library
 and dll files
 are untar'ed into your bin/ and lib/ subdirectories.
 
 Once the files are untar'ed, you must cd to the include/AL/ subdirectory
 and modify all
 the files where _WIN32 is present (use grep) and change it to simply
 WIN32 (that is,
 remove the underscore). Also, in alc.h you must change the code at top to
 look like this:
 
 #ifdef WIN32  --- CHANGE TO THIS
  #ifdef _OPENAL32LIB
   #define ALCAPI __declspec(dllexport)
  #else
   #define ALCAPI __declspec(dllimport)
  #endif
 
 #ifdef WIN32 --- CHANGE TO THIS
  typedef struct ALCdevice_struct ALCdevice;
  typedef struct ALCcontext_struct ALCcontext;
 #endif
 
 Once these changes are made, you should be able to compile simgear.
 
 --- end ---
 

Hmm ... I think we ought to correct the tarball first - we shouldn't ask
people to correct it.

V.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] A380 3D model FDM reference point

2005-06-13 Thread Innis Cunningham

Hi Martin

 Martin Spott writes


Hello, just an informal note 
To my impression the A380 needs an offset vector for the FDM reference
point in order to make it rotate around its CG. Could the author
confirm ?


This is correct I was going to move the whole 3D model in AC3D after 
everything
was finished but that has not happened yet.If you want to provide offsets 
for it

feel free


Cheers,
Martin.


Cheers
Innis



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  07:37 -0700, Andy Ross a crit :
  Andy Ross a crit :
   --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096
 
  It should work but the program overload the data, only one way the
  nasal way
 
 That sounds like a bug to me.  The command line should be overwriting
 anything in the configuration files.  Is the cloud code (over-)writing
 this property at initialization time?
 
 Andy
 
 I don't know, probably during loading, i did not looked into the code
(it was said during   new 3D clouds implementation, we should have to
use nasal for that point) 
without nasal, after loading the aircraft, looking on the menu the
buffer  size still continu to be 1024.
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  16:32 +0200, Gerard Robin a crit :
 Le lundi 13 juin 2005  15:16 +0100, Vivian Meazza a crit :
  Gerard Robin asked
  
   Something wrong ?
   in fgfsrc in have:
   
   --geometry=1280x896
   --enable-real-weather-fetch
   --timeofday=afternoon
   --prop:/nasal/local/script=![CDATA[  INIT = func {  setprop
   (/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size, 4096);  }  ]]
   
   
   nasal does give error message:  Nasal parse error: parse error in /nasal
   [0]/local[0], line 1
   
   does writing --prop:/nasal.  good
   
   
  
  Just do this:
  
  --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-enable=1
  --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096
 sorry
 Does not work the program overload the data.
 thanks
  
  V.
  
 I did not answer fully to your solution i only want cache-size=4096
 I know if i buy both i get the good answer for the same cost :-)

-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 16:32:
 Le lundi 13 juin 2005 à 15:16 +0100, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
  --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-enable=1
  --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096

 Does not work the program overload the data.

I have since a long time --config=$FG_HOME/preferences.xml in my ~/.fgfsrc[1]
(where $FG_HOME is set to $HOME/.fgfs/), and this ~/.fgfs/preferences.xml
file says (among many other things):


nasal
local
script![CDATA[
INIT = func {
setprop(/ai/models/ship/controls/glide-path, 0);
setprop(/sim/sound/volume, 0.6);
setprop(/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size, 4096);
}
settimer(INIT, 0);
]]
/script
/local
/nasal



[1] OK, that's a lie. I *had* that in my ~/.fgfsrc, but I dropped that file
because fgrun overwrote it (which is fixed now), so I moved it into my
~/bin/fgfs wrapper as command line option. But that's just a minor detail.  :-)

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] OpenAL for CygWin

2005-06-13 Thread Giles Robertson
 For Cygwin users, OpenAL needs to be retrieved from this site:
 
 ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/openal_cyg.tgz
 
 I placed this file in the /usr directory and untar'ed it, though some
 place it in the
 /usr/local/ directory tree - which might be more appropriate. Some
library
 and dll files
 are untar'ed into your bin/ and lib/ subdirectories.
 
 Once the files are untar'ed, you must cd to the include/AL/
subdirectory
 and modify all
 the files where _WIN32 is present (use grep) and change it to simply
 WIN32 (that is,
 remove the underscore). Also, in alc.h you must change the code at top
to
 look like this:
 
 #ifdef WIN32  --- CHANGE TO THIS
  #ifdef _OPENAL32LIB
   #define ALCAPI __declspec(dllexport)
  #else
   #define ALCAPI __declspec(dllimport)
  #endif
 
 #ifdef WIN32 --- CHANGE TO THIS
  typedef struct ALCdevice_struct ALCdevice;
  typedef struct ALCcontext_struct ALCcontext;
 #endif
 
 Once these changes are made, you should be able to compile simgear.
 

I'm just in the middle of finally pulling an faq update together
(various exams cropped up). I'll put this in.  Are there any other
issues people want to go in?

Giles Robertson

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  16:58 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a crit :
 * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 16:32:
  Le lundi 13 juin 2005  15:16 +0100, Vivian Meazza a crit :
   --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-enable=1
   --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096
 
  Does not work the program overload the data.
 
 I have since a long time --config=$FG_HOME/preferences.xml in my ~/.fgfsrc[1]
 (where $FG_HOME is set to $HOME/.fgfs/), and this ~/.fgfs/preferences.xml
 file says (among many other things):
 
 
 nasal
 local
 script![CDATA[
 INIT = func {
 setprop(/ai/models/ship/controls/glide-path, 0);
 setprop(/sim/sound/volume, 0.6);
 setprop(/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size, 4096);
 }
 settimer(INIT, 0);
 ]]
 /script
 /local
 /nasal
 
 
 
 [1] OK, that's a lie. I *had* that in my ~/.fgfsrc, but I dropped that file
 because fgrun overwrote it (which is fixed now), so I moved it into my
 ~/bin/fgfs wrapper as command line option. But that's just a minor detail.  
 :-)
 
 I would have to be please to you and say yes that's OK
Sorry i cannot.
 sometime ago i tried it and again i get== follow me==

  1/ with command line
 fgfscvs --airport=LFNH --aircraft=P38-L  --config=
$FG_HOME/.fgfs/preferences.xml
   
everything good   :-)
  
  2/ with .fgfsrc
--config=$FG_HOME/.fgfs/preferences.xml  
--nmea=socket,out,0.5,servlinux,5500,udp
--airport=LFNH
--geometry=1280x896
--enable-real-weather-fetch
--timeofday=afternoon

i get the message:
Error loading config file: Failed to open file
 at $FG_HOME/.fgfs/preferences.xml

 very bad  :-(

I am probably wrong somewhere  :-?

thanks


 
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 17:21:
   2/ with .fgfsrc
 --config=$FG_HOME/.fgfs/preferences.xml  

 i get the message:
 Error loading config file: Failed to open file
  at $FG_HOME/.fgfs/preferences.xml

Shell variables aren't expanded in the config file (AFAIK). That's done
by the shell when you give it on the command line. Just write it out:

--config=/home/robin_hood/.fgfs/preferences.xml

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Melchior FRANZ

 
 * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 16:32:
  Le lundi 13 juin 2005 à 15:16 +0100, Vivian Meazza a écrit :
   --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-enable=1
   --prop:/sim/rendering/clouds3d-cache-size=4096
 
  Does not work the program overload the data.
 

You need to have both - that would be reasonable since why would you set one
and not the other - a feature rather than a bug?

V.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Vivian Meazza -- Monday 13 June 2005 17:37:
 You need to have both - that would be reasonable since why would you set one
 and not the other - a feature rather than a bug?

It's at least a usability bug. The clouds code interprets cache_size=0 as
turn off rendering. So you can't have a value set with clouds off. This
should, of course, be a separate variable. It's not like we can't afford
two extra bytes on today's machines.

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  17:35 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a crit :
 * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 17:21:
2/ with .fgfsrc
  --config=$FG_HOME/.fgfs/preferences.xml  
 
  i get the message:
  Error loading config file: Failed to open file
   at $FG_HOME/.fgfs/preferences.xml
 
 Shell variables aren't expanded in the config file (AFAIK). That's done
 by the shell when you give it on the command line. Just write it out:
 
 --config=/home/robin_hood/.fgfs/preferences.xml
 
 m.
 

 i did not use robin_hoodbecause of copyright

  but again the same message:

Error loading config file: Failed to open file
 at /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml


with .fgfsrc

--config=/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  
--nmea=socket,out,0.5,servlinux,5500,udp
--airport=LFNH
--geometry=1280x896
--enable-real-weather-fetch
--timeofday=afternoon


Oh... i did not say before , i had tried it... i know just a bit  about
Linux (since 1995)   beuh and before that time UNIX...   
again  beh  .

-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] RE: Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 26, Issue 41

2005-06-13 Thread eagle monart



 This is how it was designed since it's main purpose was sending data to
 the serial port or over the network. The file option (as it is now) is
 very useful for generating log files, so it is not possible to do it
 like that at this time.

However, you might want to add
line_separatorcarriagereturn/line_separator to see if that helps.

If it doesn't work either it would be possible to add a specialized
line-separator that performs a fseek(0) just prior to writing the line.

Erik


Not worked also; maybe my mistake but i decided to play on generic code ,,, 
thanks for the help


_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 17:56:
 Error loading config file: Failed to open file
  at /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml
 
 with .fgfsrc
 
 --config=/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  

Well, then this file just doesn't exist or has wrong permissions.

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  18:24 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a crit :
 * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 17:56:
  Error loading config file: Failed to open file
   at /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml
  
  with .fgfsrc
  
  --config=/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  
 
 Well, then this file just doesn't exist or has wrong permissions.
 
 m.

  Yes
Existing, good permissions

I did also something which is verboten  i have tried under root
itself.   Whoua  the bad boy..

I'll give up.

only one question:
Without your wrapper, does the system working ?

 
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Camera/FOV/View Frustum question.

2005-06-13 Thread Drew
 Yes, I think I was successful in adding support for asymmetric view
 frustums.  It's a bit of a hack to get there, but the way I have set it
 up I think is slightly more intuitive than just passing l, r, t, b, n, f
 parameters to the glFrustum() function.
 .
 .
 .
 --prop:/sim/current-view/frustum-left-pct=0.0
 --prop:/sim/current-view/frustum-right-pct=0.33

Curt,

I know I'm reviving a somewhat old thread here, but I'm trying to use
this code to implement something similar.  It's a digital
pan/tilt/zoom camera control, and since I'm panning around a piece of
an image, it's the same situation with an offset image center.

Anyway, I'm modifying these properties real-time, and it's not
changing anything.  Is this something that will only work during
startup, or am I doing something wrong?  Is there a function I can
call to force the changes to work real-time?  Are they too
computationally intensive for this (I don't imagine it would be, since
you can rotate a standard view in a similar way).

Thanks,
Drew

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  18:34 +0200, Gerard Robin a crit :
 Le lundi 13 juin 2005  18:24 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a crit :
  * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 17:56:
   Error loading config file: Failed to open file
at /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml
   
   with .fgfsrc
   
   --config=/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  
  
  Well, then this file just doesn't exist or has wrong permissions.
  
  m.
 
   Yes
 Existing, good permissions
 
 I did also something which is verboten  i have tried under root
 itself.   Whoua  the bad boy..
 
 I'll give up.
 
 only one question:
 Without your wrapper, does the system working ?
 
  
I forgot to say, existing and good permissions, i prove it:
Command

fgfscvs --airport=LFNH --aircraft=P38-L  --config=/home/tux-le-
boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml

Working positive result

So.

-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 18:34:
 Le lundi 13 juin 2005 à 18:24 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit :
  * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 17:56:
   Error loading config file: Failed to open file

   with .fgfsrc
   
   --config=/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  
  
  Well, then this file just doesn't exist or has wrong permissions.

 Without your wrapper, does the system working ?

It works with my wrapper, and it works with that --config line in my
~/.fgfsrc. Try this:

  $ strace -fF -eopen fgfs 21|grep tux

and see which error code it returns. Isn't really a topic for devel ...

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-13 Thread Curtis L. Olson
This is not FG related, but I figured I'd do a little show and tell.  
I've been collecting a few pictures, so I thought I should share them.  
I may have mentioned in the past that I do a bit of R/C airplane 
modeling.  Last fall I found such a good deal on a ready to fly, kit 
built Citabria (with engine and radio) that it was impossible to pass it 
up.  It's a beautiful plane and relatively big.  It has an 84 wingspan 
(which is about 2.14 meters.)  I flew it Thursday for the first time, 
and then Saturday in my local club's scale fly-in.  I have a couple 
pictures here:


http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/

If you scroll down a bit there's a take off picture (with the tail wheel 
just coming up) and then two landing pictures (notice the position of 
the airplane relative to the shadow.)


I am also involved with the UMN Aerospace Engineering department 
building a UAV.  I am the airframe assembler/maintainer and chief test 
pilot.  We've done a successful maiden flight of our airframe, but 
haven't started plugging in any avionics.


http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Construction/Rascal110/

It's not quite a predator or global hawk but it sure is a lot of fun 
to fly. :-)  It's by far the biggest R/C airplane I've flown.


Oh, and if that wasn't enough to distract me from my FG duties, I'm also 
building my own low cost UAV.  I have the airframe up and flying.  I 
have the stabalization system installed and tested.  My next step is to 
get the flight computer up and running and begin working on the 
programming for that.  My primary goal is to get a self stable, self 
navigating airplane up and flying very inexpensively.  Beyond that, 
we'll just have to see what little toys (radio modem? wireless video? 
etc.?) I can sneak into the family budget and stay under the radar 
screen. :-)


http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/EGN-1/

I do hope at some point to tie in FG to both of these UAV projects.  
Specifically we want to try out some ideas of using FG as a real time 
visualization tool for the UAV in flight ... either to draw a 2d live 
updated instrument panel on the ground station, or to draw a synthetic 
view of the world from the UAV's perspective or probably some of both.  
Because the UAV and maintain straight/level flight and can navigate 
itself (I guess I should say will be able to) flying the airplane 
could simply be a matter of plunking down new waypoints on a virtual map.


This isn't quite as exciting as those posts about people getting their 
full scale pilots licenses, but it's nice to get away from the computer 
screen once in a while and do something real even though my feet have 
to stay firmly on the ground.  (Unless I crash, at which point there is 
a lot of subsequent jumping up and down and vocal noise.) :-) 


Regards,

Curt.

--
Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project  http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  18:53 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a crit :
 strace -fF -eopen fgfs 21|grep tux

The answer is: 

open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No 
such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours.gz, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No 
such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No 
such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours.gz, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No 
such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc, O_RDONLY) = 5
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
 at /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml


 


Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Andy Ross
Gerard:
 --config=/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml

 Error loading config file: Failed to open file
  at /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml

Melchior:
 Well, then this file just doesn't exist or has wrong permissions.

Gerard:
 Yes Existing, good permissions

Melchior:
 Try this:
   $ strace -fF -eopen fgfs 21|grep tux

Gerard:
 open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE)
 = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

Ding ding ding!  We have a winner! :)

Andy

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 19:19:
 open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1
 ENOENT (No such file or directory) 

Yes, and I was right: this file just doesn't exist! This is not an
fgfs message, but one of the operating system.

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  19:31 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a crit :
 * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 19:19:
  open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1
  ENOENT (No such file or directory) 
 
 Yes, and I was right: this file just doesn't exist! This is not an
 fgfs message, but one of the operating system.
 
 m.


Not so Quick..

Oh do you remember i told you :



fgfscvs --airport=LFNH --aircraft=P38-L  --config=/home/tux-le-
boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml

Working positive result

 
 Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Andy Ross

Gerard wrote:
 Melchior wrote:
  Yes, and I was right: this file just doesn't exist! This is not an
  fgfs message, but one of the operating system.

 Not so Quick..
 Oh do you remember i told you :

You can't really argue with a syscall result.  The file isn't there.

Maybe there are some other conditions (lack of x permissions in a
directory on the path?) that will produce an ENOENT instead of an
EPERM, so it's not impossible that the file is present.  But the
bottom line is that fgfs can't read the file.  We can't debug this for
you; you need to figure out your system configuration first.

Try, as the user running fgfs, things like:

ls -l /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml
cat /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  /dev/null
more /home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml

You will eventually discover what the problem is.  Again, the syscall
result is telling: you can argue on the mailing list until you
collapse from exhaustion and you will never convince the OS that the
file is there. :)

Andy

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 19:41:
 Not so Quick..
 
 Oh do you remember i told you :

I do remember. But I don't believe you.



 fgfscvs --airport=LFNH --aircraft=P38-L  --config=/home/tux-le-
 boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml

Entertain us and post the output of 

  $ strace -fF -eopen fgfs --config=/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml 
21|grep tux

Should be from the same machine, of course, and with the (non)file
unchanged.

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Ralf Gerlich

Hi,

Gerard Robin wrote:

open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)

   ^^
Did you see those blanks at the end of the filename? Are these actually 
in the original report? Where could these come from?


Ralf

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] The invisible file search

2005-06-13 Thread William D. Earnest

Hello,
	Have been reading the thread on the unreadable preferences file, and 
noticed a small detail that may be a clue. In the subject line of 
writing rules ... in fgfsrc, I see an odd block character just before 
the f in fgfsrc. It appears in messages from Gerard and Andy, but 
not those from Melchior. Is there a chance a non-ASCII or non-printing 
character snuck in so the paths do not actually match? Reading the mail 
with Thunderbird 1.0.2 on an XP system. In some messages it renders as a 
multiple space, possibly a tab.


--
Bill Earnest  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Linux Powered   Allentown, PA, USA
Computers, like air conditioners, work poorly with Windows open.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Camera/FOV/View Frustum question.

2005-06-13 Thread Drew
Ok, I figured out what's wrong.  I'm trying to set the right
properties, but those properties don't exist.  I know this is a newbie
question, but what's the procedure for creating and initializing a
property node?  I tried defining it in preferences.xml, but that just
gave an error.

Thanks,
Drew

On 6/13/05, Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yes, I think I was successful in adding support for asymmetric view
  frustums.  It's a bit of a hack to get there, but the way I have set it
  up I think is slightly more intuitive than just passing l, r, t, b, n, f
  parameters to the glFrustum() function.
  .
  .
  .
  --prop:/sim/current-view/frustum-left-pct=0.0
  --prop:/sim/current-view/frustum-right-pct=0.33
 
 Curt,
 
 I know I'm reviving a somewhat old thread here, but I'm trying to use
 this code to implement something similar.  It's a digital
 pan/tilt/zoom camera control, and since I'm panning around a piece of
 an image, it's the same situation with an offset image center.
 
 Anyway, I'm modifying these properties real-time, and it's not
 changing anything.  Is this something that will only work during
 startup, or am I doing something wrong?  Is there a function I can
 call to force the changes to work real-time?  Are they too
 computationally intensive for this (I don't imagine it would be, since
 you can rotate a standard view in a similar way).
 
 Thanks,
 Drew


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Ralf Gerlich -- Monday 13 June 2005 20:07:
 Gerard Robin wrote:
  open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , [...]
 ^^
 Did you see those blanks at the end of the filename? Are these actually 
 in the original report? Where could these come from?

Arghh. Good catch! Apparently, fgfs doesn't strip that. And Gerard
uses a crappy editor.


Add this to your ~/.vimrc and become a happier man:

  set listchars=tab:¦¯,trail:×,extends:»,precedes:«

or this:

  set listchars=tab:°`,trail:°,extends:,precedes:

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  20:07 +0200, Ralf Gerlich a crit :
 Hi,
 
 Gerard Robin wrote:
  open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 
  -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
 ^^
 Did you see those blanks at the end of the filename? Are these actually 
 in the original report? Where could these come from?
 
 Ralf
 

 Yes I did observe it, after modification   == no change, it could have
been a good explanation.
 thanks
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:14:09 -0500, Curtis wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/
 
 If you scroll down a bit there's a take off picture (with the tail
 wheel  just coming up) and then two landing pictures (notice the
 position of  the airplane relative to the shadow.)

..but there were other arrivals?  ;o)
http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/Link/IMG_2045.html

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 13 June 2005 20:24:
 Add this to your ~/.vimrc and become a happier man:
 
   set listchars=tab:¦¯,trail:×,extends:»,precedes:«

 or this:
 
   set listchars=tab:°`,trail:°,extends:,precedes:

followed by 

set list

of course, ...

m.  :-)

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Ralf Gerlich -- Monday 13 June 2005 20:07:
  Gerard Robin wrote:
   open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , [...]
  ^^
  Did you see those blanks at the end of the filename? Are these actually 
  in the original report? Where could these come from?
 
 Arghh. Good catch! Apparently, fgfs doesn't strip that. And Gerard
 uses a crappy editor.

Maybe this should be changed like so:


diff -u -p -U1 -r1.67 options.cxx
--- options.cxx 25 Feb 2005 21:20:17 -  1.67
+++ options.cxx 13 Jun 2005 18:39:45 -
@@ -1537,3 +1537,3 @@ fgParseOptions (const string path) {
 // catch extraneous (DOS) line ending character
-if ( line[line.length() - 1]  32 ) {
+while ( line[line.length() - 1] = 32 ) {
 line = line.substr( 0, line.length()-1 );

or more efficient ...   :-)

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-13 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Arnt Karlsen wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:14:09 -0500, Curtis wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 


http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/

If you scroll down a bit there's a take off picture (with the tail
wheel  just coming up) and then two landing pictures (notice the
position of  the airplane relative to the shadow.)
   



..but there were other arrivals?  ;o)
http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/Link/IMG_2045.html
 



That's one of my favorite non-flight pictures because of the sun angle.  
It's taken in my driveway so there was no flying that day.  One of these 
days it would be fun to rig up a wireless camera on board.  I could do 
several flights with different camera placements and orientations, mix 
in some ground footage, set to music, and it could come out looking 
really cool.  I've got an ultra cheap wireless video system, but it has 
horribly short range and horribly heavy batteries, and a really crappy 
camera so it's not very good for flying (and not much good for anything 
else for that matter.) :-)


Curt.

--
Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project  http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-13 Thread Jim Wilson
 From: Curtis L. Olson
 
 This is not FG related, but I figured I'd do a little show and tell.  
 I've been collecting a few pictures, so I thought I should share them.  
 I may have mentioned in the past that I do a bit of R/C airplane 
 modeling.  Last fall I found such a good deal on a ready to fly, kit 
 built Citabria (with engine and radio) that it was impossible to pass it 
 up.  It's a beautiful plane and relatively big.  It has an 84 wingspan 
 (which is about 2.14 meters.)  I flew it Thursday for the first time, 
 and then Saturday in my local club's scale fly-in.  I have a couple 
 pictures here:
 
 http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/
 

That is big.  Our cat wants me to tell you he volunteers to be a test pilot.

Best,

Jim



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  19:58 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a crit :
 * Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 19:41:
  Not so Quick..
  
  Oh do you remember i told you :
 
 I do remember. But I don't believe you.
 
 
 
  fgfscvs --airport=LFNH --aircraft=P38-L  --config=/home/tux-le-
  boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml
 
 Entertain us and post the output of 
 
   $ strace -fF -eopen fgfs --config=/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml 
 21|grep tux
 
 Should be from the same machine, of course, and with the (non)file
 unchanged.
 
 m.
 
  I had a little break for dinner, now:

the answer  for Entertain:

$  strace -fF -eopen fgfscvs --config=/home/tux-le-
boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml 21|grep tux-le

open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours.gz, O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours.gz, O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc, O_RDONLY) = 3
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc, O_RDONLY) = 5
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfsrc.servlinux.gours.gz, O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) =
5


 
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:50:21 +0200, Gerard wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Le lundi 13 juin 2005  01:13 +0200, Gerard Robin a crit :
  Le dimanche 12 juin 2005  22:07 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a crit :
   On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:43:44 +0200, Paul wrote in message 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   
On Sunday, 12 June 2005 09:22, Erik Hofman wrote:
 Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
  I like that idea.  It would be nice to fly along the coast
  of a tropical island, look down and be able to see the white
  sand under the water... or flying above a coral reef and see
  the corals on the sea floor. =)
 
  Seperating land and water will also allow tidal effects to
  be modelled.  As for underwater exploration, I for one
  wouldn't mind taking the UFO down and see some underwater
  landmarks such as the Titanic.  hehe.

 I think we're all getting carried away a bit. We are aiming at
 a professional *flightsimulator* to be used as a training aid,
 not for Hollywood film making.
   
   ...the funny thing is, FG _is_ useable for film making, and
   wasting some time on making an Hollywood film could easily land
   us some serious funding to do the things we wanna do.
   
 Erik

Personally I don't care much for submarines and sealife in a
flight sim. What Flight Unlimited did was when you crashed in
water the screen went a  murky water color and your altitude
starts heading for negative figures. No fish, no sharks and no
coral but you get the point that you just crashed  into water
and that should be sufficient in my opinion.
   
   ...true, but landing a sea plane in any significant weather, means
   we should model sea states, waves behave differently depending on
   things like currents, depth, wind etc, also on lakes and rivers. 
  
If someone wants to make a submarine simulator then they are
welcome to make a  fork of FlightGear and name it SubGear but
I'm interested in aerodynamics and  not aquadynamics.
   
   ...then we have the waves made by the aircraft floats.  ;o)
  
  You are right and today we have to search for the best effect with
  an object animated like the aircraft shadow. I have tried to do it
  http://ghours.club.fr/Walrus-Villefranche1.jpg

..neat plane, but your sparkling waveless spray demos my point nicely,
dunk a Walrus into 5 thru 25ft seas, and you'll find that the one ton
big toothed seal can spank you mildly thru _roundly_, just like the
water the plane lands or dunks into.   ;o)

  May be with Sparkle we could get a better aspect
 
 And I forgot: Plib include some functions in _SSG Auxiliary Libraries_
 which are very useful.

..useful to model physical forces?  Or just to hit the degauss button
remotely to simulate a nose punch?  ;o)

..don't read me as we have enough fancy eyecandy, we need more of that
too, but we also need running water here.  ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Monday 13 June 2005 20:53:
   I had a little break for dinner, now:
 
 the answer  for Entertain:

It's not funny any more, now that we know that you fooled us by adding
two spaces to the ~/.fgfsrc config line.   ;-)

m.

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 13 juin 2005  20:07 +0200, Ralf Gerlich a crit :
 Hi,
 
 Gerard Robin wrote:
  open(/home/tux-le-boss/.fgfs/preferences.xml  , O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 
  -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
 ^^
 Did you see those blanks at the end of the filename? Are these actually 
 in the original report? Where could these come from?
 
 Ralf
 
 Yes now that is good, my first correction introduced probably an other
blank.

After using Emacs no Problem (ahrrg  kedit), 
i continu to learn where are the traps.

I can give to Ralf the prize, if everybody agree.

And many thanks to everybody.
 





-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-13 Thread Gerard Robin

 If someone wants to make a submarine simulator then they are
 welcome to make a  fork of FlightGear and name it SubGear but
 I'm interested in aerodynamics and  not aquadynamics.

...then we have the waves made by the aircraft floats.  ;o)
   
   You are right and today we have to search for the best effect with
   an object animated like the aircraft shadow. I have tried to do it
   http://ghours.club.fr/Walrus-Villefranche1.jpg
 
 ...neat plane, but your sparkling waveless spray demos my point nicely,
 dunk a Walrus into 5 thru 25ft seas, and you'll find that the one ton
 big toothed seal can spank you mildly thru _roundly_, just like the
 water the plane lands or dunks into.   ;o)
 
   May be with Sparkle we could get a better aspect
  
  And I forgot: Plib include some functions in _SSG Auxiliary Libraries_
  which are very useful.
 
 ...useful to model physical forces?  Or just to hit the degauss button
 remotely to simulate a nose punch?  ;o)
 
 ...don't read me as we have enough fancy eyecandy, we need more of that
 too, but we also need running water here.  ;o)
 
Anyway, that is mainly to illustrate the discussion, to demonstrate the
limitation of our system (today). I did it only on that Walrus because
it is little (the animation is only driven by the aircraft speed, agl
and pitch).
It was said that we do not have to make the Hollywood quality movie and
i agree.
However we could try to find the way which drive to get the best
picture,  with a combination of specific animations driven by speed,
forces,... light processing, and characteristics of materials.

It is a pity to see a seaplane taking off, and nothing happen on the sea
level , the ground-effect is able to give  parameters which could help
the design.  

The new 3D clouds are a good exemple of programming ressource, which
could be used to simulate random waves  ( i will get god lightnings or
rather devil fires, if i continu in that way ). 
-- 
Gerard


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: writing rules with --prop for nasal in fgfsrc

2005-06-13 Thread Ralf Gerlich

Gerard Robin schrieb:

I can give to Ralf the prize, if everybody agree.


Thanks, too much honor ;-)

Ralf

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


RE: [Flightgear-devel] Backing out Andy's p51d changes

2005-06-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Jim Wilson wrote

 P.S.  Any chance someone good with nasal could write me a quick script for
 changing the BOOST value to 1.0 at 20,000FT ASL and then back to 0.4 at
 19,999.99FT?  I'd try and figure it out, but my time is very limited right
 now.  tia
 

If you still want this stuff - a Nasal file is attached which monitors
altitude asl and changes the boost setting appropriately. I've added a 50ft
dead zone to prevent hunting: seems to work OK here. Put it in P51d/models.

You'll need to add this to the p51d-set.xml file:

nasal 
  p51d 
fileAircraft/p51d/Models/p51d.nas/file
  /p51d
/nasal

Regards

Vivian


p51d.nas
Description: Binary data
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:11:42 +0200, Gerard wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 It was said that we do not have to make the Hollywood quality movie
 and i agree.

..we have enough to get funding for the missing bits.  ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Completely OT (but aviation related.)

2005-06-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:39:21 -0500, Curtis wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
 
  On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:14:09 -0500, Curtis wrote in message 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
   http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/
   If you scroll down a bit there's a take off picture (with the tail
   wheel  just coming up) and then two landing pictures (notice the
   position of  the airplane relative to the shadow.)
 
  ..but there were other arrivals?  ;o)
  http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Models/Current/MidwestCitabria/Link/IMG_2045.html
 
 That's one of my favorite non-flight pictures because of the sun
 angle.   It's taken in my driveway so there was no flying that day. 

..those prop tips, ... taxiing?   ;o)

 One of these days it would be fun to rig up a wireless camera on
 board.  I could do several flights with different camera placements
 and orientations, mix in some ground footage, set to music, and it
 could come out looking really cool.  I've got an ultra cheap wireless
 video system, but it has horribly short range and horribly heavy
 batteries, and a really crappy camera so it's not very good for
 flying (and not much good for anything else for that matter.) :-)

..you're thinking about flying the video?  Use those batteries in your
1/4 scale Colditz bath tub and wind up a generator spool and feed it
magnetism off your magnetic prop drive flange.  Tap that spool thru a
diode bridge and a 7805, smooth things with a coupla capasitors each
side of the 7805, and hike the 7805's 5.0VDC with a .3V zener diode 
to 5.3VDC.  You want sound too.  ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] poll

2005-06-13 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
Water isn't the only other material that should be modelled.  There are also 
other materials such as grass and soil.  Right now, I can take a short cut 
across the grass in any airport without concern, and these sort of behaviours 
should bring some consequences. =)



Ampere

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] A380 3D model FDM reference point

2005-06-13 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On June 13, 2005 02:40 pm, Innis Cunningham wrote:
 Hi Martin

   Martin Spott writes

 Hello, just an informal note 
 To my impression the A380 needs an offset vector for the FDM reference
 point in order to make it rotate around its CG. Could the author
 confirm ?

 This is correct I was going to move the whole 3D model in AC3D after
 everything
 was finished but that has not happened yet.If you want to provide offsets
 for it
 feel free

 Cheers,
  Martin.

 Cheers
 Innis

If there is going to be changes to the A380-set.xml, please wait until Curt 
has uploaded my updates first, which should be anytime now...

On the subject of finishing the A380, is there any kind soul who wouldn't mind 
helping me to come up with a few Nasal scripts?



Ampere

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d