[hugin-ptx] Re: tiff package error
Would renaming them to have the names you listed do the trick? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/0fd78f7e-404c-40e1-b25e-3d36cea6656d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Lost fast panorama preview under Microsoft
I did not download and test the images with the pto. Just looking at the pto, it looks like there are no control points in it yet. In what way is it broken? I do note that most of the images have different yaw settings. Did you move them around, apply a preset to them or did hugin do that? If so at what point did hugin do it? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/1f7a61cb-37b9-4c12-b621-c25b92f333e3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: tiff package error
Took a few tries on different nights, but I have finally gotten everything compiled or put in the correct place*I think* Now I am compiling panotools and have stumbled again. When I go to work with libpano-hg it does not find the tiff paths correctly.(probably my problem, but the tiff stuff did compile with no errors.) What should the correct entry for TIFF_LIBRARIES_RELEASE and TIFF_LIBRARY_RELEASE look like? I took a guess as you can see below. When I go to compile about half fail with errors talking about libtiff the kinds of errors, makes me think I have done this part wrong. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/db92e8ca-7369-4256-b926-6c248414d642%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: tiff package error
Correct. That is how I did it. I do not know what I did differently this morning. it still puts it in the wrong place, but it made a lot more files this time and now I can progress to the next step.(once I copied the files to the correct place.) -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/7df909e0-4231-4af2-a7c9-95fd86dcc8dc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: tiff package error
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 9:14:34 AM UTC-7, T. Modes wrote: > > > > Am Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2015 10:19:54 UTC+2 schrieb Brandon: >> >> I am also following the instructions at >> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Windows_with_SDK >> > > These are completely outdated. See > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_SDK_%28MSVC_2013%29 for current > instructions. > > That answers a few questions. New problem CMake Error at C:/Program Files (x86)/CMake/share/cmake-3.4/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:148 (message): Could NOT find ZLIB (missing: ZLIB_LIBRARY ZLIB_INCLUDE_DIR) Call Stack (most recent call first): C:/Program Files (x86)/CMake/share/cmake-3.4/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:388 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE) C:/Program Files (x86)/CMake/share/cmake-3.4/Modules/FindZLIB.cmake:124 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS) CMakeLists.txt:24 (find_package) When I build the install version of zlib-1.2.8 it puts the results in my project folder instead of below huginSDK. (I have edited the line in Cmake as the instructions say. To solve that problem I have copied the continence to huginSDK/zlib/ Figuring that would solve the worlds problems. Either way when I try to run *libpng 1.6.15 *through Cmake I get the above errors. I will try again another day, but currently I am stumped. Same computer info as above. So far trying to building everything at 64 bit. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/a9f9bb2e-8f3c-4c6f-a901-5e0997d7244f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: tiff package error
I am also following the instructions at http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Windows_with_SDK I have the exact same error showing up. I have downloaded and built tiff-4.0.6, but I have no idea where to put it so that it solves the error. Did I get the correct tool. If so which file that it makes do I want to put where? I am on windows 7, huginbase is at C:/code/huginbase/ I currently have tiff-4.0.6 and its full directory set at C:/code/huginbase/tiff-4.0.6/ I have high graded several files that it compiled that looked promising and moved them to other folders closer to hugin base, but have not yet found the right file to put in the right spot. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c775201b-9812-4b70-b152-64934c04f264%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Ev numbers mean what/backwards on preview?
On Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:02:07 AM UTC-8, T. Modes wrote: Smaller numbers mean longer exposure time and/or brighter aperture (smaller f-stop) and therefore more light - brighter images (of the same scene). Bigger number - shorter exposure time and/or closed aperture (bigger f-stop) - darker images. That makes sense as well. That is the way it works on the fast preview. On the image tab though if I increase the EV number the image gets brighter instead of darker. I wonder why? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/f35ca382-25dc-4095-bbc9-c1dd3e946a52%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Ev numbers mean what/backwards on preview?
This may be an overly basic question, but what exactly do the EV numbers equal? Looking at the image tab they appear to match a mix of shutter speed and aperture and likely ISO, though I have not tested it to much. Bigger numbers let more light in and smaller numbers let less light in. That is simple and makes sense to me. That theory gets shot up when looking at the fast preview and changing the EV there. Bigger numbers make the final pano darker and smaller ones are brighter. Why does the EV scale go backwards depending on where you are looking? This makes things very confusing when telling someone to brighten something by one EV number and no one can remember which way is brighter as it all depends on what a person is adjusting. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/641274f8-80ed-40f9-8d08-bbbdbb709797%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Ev numbers mean what/backwards on preview?
That is a great read, thanks for the link. I am not sure it answers my second question though. Why is the fast preview EV number backwards from the EV on the images tab when you try and change it? On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 12:46:01 AM UTC-8, Brandon wrote: This may be an overly basic question, but what exactly do the EV numbers equal? Looking at the image tab they appear to match a mix of shutter speed and aperture and likely ISO, though I have not tested it to much. Bigger numbers let more light in and smaller numbers let less light in. That is simple and makes sense to me. That theory gets shot up when looking at the fast preview and changing the EV there. Bigger numbers make the final pano darker and smaller ones are brighter. Why does the EV scale go backwards depending on where you are looking? This makes things very confusing when telling someone to brighten something by one EV number and no one can remember which way is brighter as it all depends on what a person is adjusting. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/619435d6-e449-4022-9635-6a6eff1fe3b5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] How to set stacks from the command line?
On Sunday, November 30, 2014 4:01:55 AM UTC-8, T. Modes wrote: Or much easier to do this on the images tab. The context menu have options to modify stacks. And when display group by stack you can simply drag and drop the images to the corresponding stacks. But that's to obviously? Hmm I did not know about the drag and drop before. That is actually kind of fun. It still has the problem of linking all of the images positions, I then need to set custom parameters for optimizing and then go to the optimizer tab and unlink them all. Then go back to the images tab and re-optimize. If I forget to unlink one or more and stitch it, I generally will end up with a part that looks like the camera was shook during a long exposure(There is often a small amount of wiggle between my stacked shots) -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/628c8b6c-9220-452b-a9e1-e8d1728ca307%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] How to set stacks from the command line?
On Sunday, November 30, 2014 2:56:04 PM UTC-8, Tduell wrote: Hello Brandon, I see that Thomas has described how to do all this in the photos tab. For some reason I had concluded that you wanted to do all this via command line, maybe to be able to script it. I was on the wrong track, sorry. You were correct I have an autoit script that I am working with that I was hoping to do it all from the command line with. I am hoping to drag and drop a pto file onto my script and it stacks things up that over lap too much. Thanks to your help, I should be able to do it in the next day or two. I know what needs to be done and will I just code my script to open up the pto file as text and make the changes as needed. Thomas thanks for your tips as well. I had no idea that hugin did so many different things depending on how the images were grouped. That is good to know for when I need to fine tune what my script gives me back. I can get hugin to crash if I try some really advanced stuff with some of those groupings and it appears to be limited in some ways that the command line is not. For example group 9 images to use the same mask, and subgroup it into three groups of three images that have linked y,p,r. Is that something that can be done in the GUI? From the command line it is easy enough, now that I know which var is the mask stack. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/b5fc8e53-db18-45be-a66f-5dc88c3311d5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] How to set stacks from the command line?
Keep in mind that I have not found it in the documentation and am just guessing by trial and error as I write this. If anyone has better thoughts, please speak up. I load 3 images into a file my third image: On Load i w5184 h3456 f0 v=0 Ra=0 Rb=0 Rc=0 Rd=0 Re=0 Eev1.52160036448132 Er1 Eb1 r270 p0 y0 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 j0 a=0 b=0 c=0 d=0 e=0 g=0 t=0 Va=0 Vb=0 Vc=0 Vd=0 Vx=0 Vy=0 Vm5 nW:\zoober\source\weekend B\bridge\IMG_5303.JPG I set control points and optimize for starting at anchor. i w5184 h3456 f0 v=0 Ra=0 Rb=0 Rc=0 Rd=0 Re=0 Eev1.52160036448132 Er1 Eb1 r- 79.5612487857035 p7.99448156318547 y109.37396929857 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 j0 a=0 b= 0 c=0 d=0 e=0 g=0 t=0 Va=0 Vb=0 Vc=0 Vd=0 Vx=0 Vy=0 Vm5 nW:\zoober\source\weekend B\bridge\IMG_5303.JPG I optimize all. i w5184 h3456 f0 v=0 Ra=0 Rb=0 Rc=0 Rd=0 Re=0 Eev1.52160036448132 Er1 Eb1 r- 91.0853510851596 p0.839286712216139 y115.117872304818 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 j0 a=0 b=0 c=0 d=0 e=0 g=0 t=0 Va=0 Vb=0 Vc=0 Vd=0 Vx=0 Vy=0 Vm5 nW:\zoober\source\weekend B\bridge\IMG_5303.JPG Now looking at the first image. Loaded i w5184 h3456 f0 v105 Ra0 Rb0 Rc0 Rd0 Re0 Eev1.52160036448132 Er1 Eb1 r270 p0 y0 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 j0 a0 b0 c0 d0 e0 g0 t0 Va1 Vb0 Vc0 Vd0 Vx0 Vy0 Vm5 nW:\zoober\source\weekend B\bridge\IMG_5301.JPG optimized position, no change i w5184 h3456 f0 v105 Ra0 Rb0 Rc0 Rd0 Re0 Eev1.52160036448132 Er1 Eb1 r270 p0 y0 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 j0 a0 b0 c0 d0 e0 g0 t0 Va1 Vb0 Vc0 Vd0 Vx0 Vy0 Vm5 nW:\zoober\source\weekend B\bridge\IMG_5301.JPG optimized all i w5184 h3456 f0 v112.42242938554 Ra0 Rb0 Rc0 Rd0 Re0 Eev1.52160036448132 Er1 Eb1 r270 p0 y0 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 j0 a0.0234907215216856 b- 0.0197428064061075 c-0.375993809538199 d-607.606164547881 e8.5360734315 g0 t0 Va1 Vb0 Vc0 Vd0 Vx0 Vy0 Vm5 nW:\zoober\source\weekend B\bridge\IMG_5301.JPG Looking around hugin I know what most of those do. I have not seen j or Vm5 before in hugin. I am guessing that Vm5 has something to do with Vignetting, but I could be wrong. Just looking around I have no idea what j does, from looking at my pto files in the past I have a good idea that it has something to do with stacks, beyond that I do not know. Just for the heck of it I changed both anchors to the third image(2 as it is zero based) Near as I can tell it added k2 (That is the exposure anchor,I tested it) to the output line and changed which variables should be optimized in the v lines. Back on the main topic I started changing the j value on the third image in a text editor. j1 does nothing jany# does nothing j=1 stacks my third image to my second image. Any thoughts on why some vars use an = and some do not? p0 y0 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 j0 all equal null? To my eye it appears that anyvar0 is the same as null. To test it I have tried deleting most of them from an image and hugin opens it just fine. If I save it and open with text editor again they are back. I copy and pasted my 2nd and 3rd i lines enough times to make 10 images. I then played with those more extensively. I thought that I was having some problems in the past figuring out the target. Just editing the text file I get it right every time. Just set the image number that I want to link to and it works. No mater how the other images are linked. If I remember right and was correct in what I was seeing that is not how pto_lensstack works. I was having a very hard time figuring out the correct targets for it. Editing the pto file in a text editor, I can even link to an image that is linked to another image. When I open hugin, hugin is able to figure it out that all three are linked together. Then if I save it and open as text, it will have saved everything with the correct links instead of the chain of links that I set. j does appear to be what I want. If I link j the masks work on each image, but each is left in their own position and can be optimized. If I put in the wrong number for j anything bigger than the current image and try to open with hugin, hugin crashes. On Saturday, November 29, 2014 4:02:13 PM UTC-8, Tduell wrote: Hello Brandon, [snip] Cheers, -- Regards, Terry Duell A big thanks Terry. Mostly motivation to get me to do the work. I had not changed the pto file in a text editor before that is actually a lot of fun. I think we have solved Question 2 and Question 3. Anyone have thoughts on Question 1? How does a person normally go about changing the j var from the command line? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/971dbcaa-9e21-4f4b-9283-c710fce10c48
Re: [hugin-ptx] How to set stacks from the command line?
On Saturday, November 29, 2014 8:22:21 PM UTC-8, Tduell wrote: Perhaps I've missed something in the subsequent discussion, but isn't that pto_lenstack --new-stack i1, i2, ix?. I would think so, but no. With out running pto_lenstack again(it has been a week or two since I last tried it) I remember it linking the yaw, pitch, and role as well as the j var, which is what got me pointed in that direction. If we can figure that out I still have one heck of a time figuring out where to set the target. Reading the documentation again I think I figured out my problem there. pto_lenstack does not use which image to link to, but which stack to link with. With a file that has 60 pictures and the stacks can be different numbers, it is hard to keep track of which image is in which stack. I am sure there is a work around, I am just wondering if there is a clean one? Now that j appears to do what I hopped it would do, I am starting to think it would be easiest to have my script open the pto file and change it directly without bothering with the command line. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/e710a1b8-432c-407b-bebe-b5f19dd172ad%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] How to set stacks from the command line?
What is the correct way to set stacks from the command line? I have a script that reads a pto file looks at the overlap and if any images overlaps too much it tries to stack them.(it makes it easier for me to set masks, if they are stacked, but there can be some movement between them so I wish to have hugin arrange each one.) I have been trying to use pto_lensstack --change-stack i1=0 input.pto It does work in that it changes the stack of an image, but I have yet to figure out how to tell it which stack it is going to. The first time I call it I can generally get right. After the first call I often get the target stack wrong as the target seems to change as I set stacks. Question 2 is there a way to set the stacks, without linking the position variables? I could do the above way then unlink them, but that seems a waste as I would then need to re optimize image positions. Question 3, what is j mean on the i lines of a pto file? i w3456 h5184 f10 v=0 Ra=0 Rb=0 Rc=0 Rd=0 Re=0 Eev13.580494060253 Er1 Eb1 r0 .795541422974953 p9.80002443579522 y176.612097040948 TrX0 TrY0 TrZ0 j=0 a=0 b=0 c=0 d=0 e=0 g=0 t=0 Va=0 Vb=0 Vc=0 Vd=0 Vx=0 Vy=0 Vm5 n long_beach0033.TIF I know what all of the other things do, but have not been able to find any documentation on j. The j=0 in that last one seems to be the thing that makes this image stack with the first without messing up the positions. If true how does a person set it and if I can is there a reliable way to figure out where to set the stack to.(It would be real nice if I could tell it stack image a to have the same stack number as image b, without me having to know what stack b already is in, as that appears to be a moving target) All thought and comments welcome, Thanks, Brandon -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/41dbe399-0a40-4e8a-bde9-365f2113491d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: How to fuse my stacks not what huging thinks is a stack.
Thank you everyone, I had no idea that setting was even there. I have found that setting it to 0.9 solves the problem. What is the point of setting the stacks by hand? It looks like this will do it automatically for me and will save me the time and effort of stacking them and then going to the optimizer tab and unlinking them as there is almost always a little shake between shots. On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:05:16 PM UTC-8, Tduell wrote: On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:56:23 +1100, T. Modes thomas...@gmx.de javascript: wrote: Thanks Thomas. In Photos tab, set Group by: Output stacks, then set minimum overlap. Cheers, -- Regards, Terry Duell Thanks I would not have found it without your detailed instructions. It really is amazing how much stuff is hidden in hugin if a person can find it. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/39628e3a-bb1a-45ff-b33a-38f45ed30dde%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] How to fuse my stacks not what huging thinks is a stack.
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:14:12 AM UTC-8, Tduell wrote: I'm pretty sure that hugin will honour your choice of stacks, rather than use the above rule. I have always set the images in my stacks, and haven't tried exposure fusion from stacks without any stacks set. The images in each stack do need to be perfectly aligned for this to give a good result. Auto bracketed shots, hand held, can be sufficiently out of alignment to give a poor result. Hand held bracketed shots are best put through align_image_stack prior to stitching and using exposure fusion from stacks. Cheers, -- Regards, Terry Duell That is what I thought it should do, but it appear to do differently. When I photograph I currently do a bracketed down shot with the tripod, then turn the tripod 180 and do the next bracketed down shot. I set those as two different stacks. Yet when hugin goes to stitch it it will combine those, plus if I have a handheld shot in a third stack it will combine it in there as well. I came to that conclusion by checking the filename_stack_ldr_ images. There is not enough of them compared to what I told it to make and when I find the downshot it has combined more stacks than it should have. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/d3145378-d0b5-4ffb-a516-b795bbe1729f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] How to fuse my stacks not what huging thinks is a stack.
From the wiki, If *Exposure fused from stacks* is enabled then hugin will group the input images into exposure stacks by comparing positions, any images with more than 70 % overlap are grouped like this. Each of these bracketed http://wiki.panotools.org/Bracketing exposure stacks will be exposure fused http://wiki.panotools.org/index.php?title=Exposure_fusionaction=editredlink=1 with enfuse http://wiki.panotools.org/Enfuse and the results seam blended together into a panorama with enblend http://wiki.panotools.org/Enblend. Is it possible to have hugin enfuse stacks of my choosing on the photos tab instead of the default any images with more than 70 % overlap combined into each stack? If I can force it to use my stacks all is well. If hugin instead grabs 2 different stacks of photos(normally my down shots) and combines them the result looks like the camera shook while taking the shot. Thanks, Brandon -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/9de4fbb4-227a-4bc5-9acd-aff2c04dc325%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: workflow enfuse with no panorama?! can't figure it out
Let us know what settings you find that make much of a difference. In the last month or so I have been messing with them and have not been able to find a way to improve them much. Windows the bane of this photographer. It seems there should be a good setting to deal with them, but I have not found the perfect ones yet. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/8cf5e727-f582-4d68-918f-2faf79e2d698%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Batch processor is starting to have problems.
HI all. The batch processor is starting to give me problems. The symptoms range from taking a long time to open to the icon not responding period. Plus it like to throw me a few different errors once in a while. When trying to start it once in a while I get this DDE data request failed: A request for a synchronous data transaction has timed out. Once going I once in a while get messages along the lines of 10:35:00 PM: W:\zoober\source\weekend B\WA long beach\gameroom/long_beach0321.TIF: unknown field with tag 59932 (0xea1c) encountered (in module TIFFReadDirectory) Once it finally gets going if I remove all of the completed projects from the que it tends to think life is good again for a while. A few dozen projects later it starts slowing down and not responding very quickly if at all. Any thoughts? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/eb659935-0395-4705-9b59-6fa5be96fbbf%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Remove control points that are under a mask?
I am having a hard time convincing hugin to not put control points on my tri-pod. Is there any way to do prevent control points from being put on them? Failing that is there a way to remove control points that have been placed in an area that has a mask on it? I have been using cpclean, but I have not figured out a consistent way to use it and get the correct results. If I mess around and run it a half dozen times it generally does the job. Seems there should be a better way. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c0a0cd0d-aae9-4159-b643-8b06d1442929%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Remove control points that are under a mask?
A quick follow up Is there a way to remove the control points from masks from the command line? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c18446a8-fff1-4df6-adcf-37673c8f8734%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin appears to be non-deterministic?
Enblend is the tool that figures out where to blend the lines, it seams to have a randomness when figuring some parts of where to blend photos together. I have tested it a lot and near as I can tell that is the only part in my work flow that changes much and it is just a little here and there. Most of the time it is not noticeable. If that is a problem you might try multiblend I have not messed with it much but I do know it works differently and it may give you consistent results. Also check the documentation on enblend, there may have been mention of the seed generator in there. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/8e4f7c2d-d320-42c8-b599-d8e75fc931d5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] What kind of lens does hugin call a Rokinon 8mm?
I have a new fish eye lens and I do not know what to tell hugin it is. It is a dead lens, so it does not have any exif data for hugin to look at so I need to put it in by hand. The lens is a Rokinon HD8M-C 8mm f/3.5 HD Fisheye Lens with Removeable Hood for Canon DSLR 8-8mm, Fixed-Non-Zoom Lens http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008X1C4IY/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s01?ie=UTF8psc=1 The part that has me stumped is it a normal lens, circular fish eye, a full frame fish eye or something else? I am using it on a cannon rebel t5 if that makes any difference. It has a focal multiplier of 1.585x -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/a57a4223-1b84-462b-af6d-0178aadb7981%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] What kind of lens does hugin call a Rokinon 8mm?
On Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:02:34 PM UTC-7, David Benes wrote:Hi Brandon, is seems, that it is the same lens as Samyang 8mm f/3.5 (except the removable hood). That Samyang has stereographic projection. Regards David On your advice I just tried a stereographic projection and re-optimized one of my projects and it looks great! I had tried the other settings that I mentioned above and it never worked out. I was starting to worry that the lens would not work with hugin. A big thanks, getting that right makes me a lot happier person :) I still need to figure out how the correct lens parameters. The two projects that I just loaded and optimized are now doing very well. The only complainant is that the extreme edges are not quite lining up right. Hopefully a night of messing around I can get them corrected. To shift the question a little bit, how does a person know what kind of projection is the correct one for their lens and or camera combo? I read everything there was with my lens and there was no mention of anything that would have lead me to think stereographic. On the Canon T5, the lens behaves as a full frame fisheye. The focal length usually works out nearer 9mm than 8mm, but the optimizer will evaluate the correct hfov when you stitch a full 360x180 panorama. John I was thinking the way you were and had been trying the various fisheye projections and it was not working. Maybe someone has some insight as to why it turns out to be a stereographic instead? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/281e9ab0-07e3-4a95-9e3f-6ad6a7651e6f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin Translation x PTGui Viewpoint optimization
Could a person stitch the pano together with everything other than the handheld down shot. Stitch it take the result and turn it into a cube. Then take the floor side of the cube and using the mosaic stuff that hugin has put the hand held down shoot onto the floor side of the cube? I have not had a down shot bad enough that I have done it yet, but I have wondered about it and if that would be possible. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/22c8c9a4-fbee-4cce-b056-5798475256f1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: With command line scriting how to load lens data from file?
Thank you, that sounds like it should solve my problem. :) I did not realize the database was local, so I have never used it. I will play with that and see if I can get it to work for me. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/294a627c-2834-447b-bdba-e10c61a27bca%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Enblend adds black to edges of some pictures
I restitched it a few times and got the same picture as what I posted. Thanks for your input and directing me in the correct direction. I did a little more experamenting and I think I have figured out that it only happens when using an include mask. I have been thinking about it and I am pretty sure it has never happened when I have just been using exclude masks. If I remove either one of the include masks in the test project the bug goes away. Replace the missing one with an exclude mask in the correct place and there is no bug. I have reported the bug and all that I know about it. I hope it helps figure out the bug :) -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/2f5e6577-fb69-4a7e-89c2-c82b2360acd9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin operation questions from a mostly-newby
So the stitch that took Hugin 6 hours (and for which I hadn't found the proper means of setting the scope of the images), took Gigapan Stitcher 16 minutes. And that was with basically one button press: - Stitch One thing that I have discovered that really helps speed the stitching up is on the stitching tab put -a with out the quotes as a command for enblend. I am generally stitching in the10-20k pixels wide range and using the -a cuts stitching time by 1/4 to 1/3. The only down side that I have found to using -a is that it is a bugger to get the masks right when there are a lot of moving objects close to the camera(think family reunion with the whole family around the camera and the people move some between shoots) For your pictures it should help stitch time a lot. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/80855258-7493-4ce2-a543-81c9582748f6%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Problem with GL preview
Tonight this bug is really bothering me. I have hit my undo button often enough that I have noticed the change that is causing the problem tonight. On the stitching tab if I have the canvas set to the optimal size (23514) the bug is not there, but if I set it smaller than 11750 (about half) the problem starts happening. Conversely if I set the output any bigger than optimal size it shows up. The further I get from that general range the worse the blurring gets. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/dc2cdfb3-9671-46c9-af48-dc6e11094f3e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: autopano.exe return errors when run with huggin.
On Monday, September 8, 2014 5:54:59 AM UTC-7, Henk Tijdink wrote: Correction, I'm only sure that autopano of Alexandre Jenny doesn't work on a 64 bits system. 0n 32 bits windows 7 I didn't test. Op maandag 8 september 2014 13:59:54 UTC+2 schreef Henk Tijdink: I don't know which autopano.exe you use. If it is autopano.exe 1.03 of Alexandre Jenny then it doesn't work in Windows 7. Even not in compatibility mode. It is only a 32 bits program. Even on WIN 7 32 bit it doesn't work.That is known, but sometime people forget it. If it is autopano.exe in Autopano SIFT-C for the 2 way controlpoint generation in combination with generate key.exe (multirow/stacking) that should work. Kind regards, Henk Tijdink I am using autopano.exe 1.03 http://autopano.kolor.com/ on a 64 bit system and it is working great on my desktop(takes about 1/4 the time and gets three times as many control points at CPfind, plus last night I was learning the command line options on it and it allows for an amazing amount of control over how it finds points and how long it takes to do a search). Since there is a question on if it will work on all 64 bit systems I will make sure I give it a test with the command line on my friends computer next chance that I get. On Monday, September 8, 2014 5:29:44 AM UTC-7, Cartola wrote: Try also to check that all paths for all images don't have strange characters in your friends machine, like spaces, accent characters or punctuation. I have checked for fancy characters in the paths for the pictures and hugin and there are none.(that has been a problem sometimes in the past, I think I have learned my lesson on that point finally) You told your friend has two Hugin versions... so, who knows, perhaps there is some mess if the PATH variable calls the binaries from the wrong version instead of from the actual, desired directory? I don't recall if windows prefers the binary from the current directory or from the PATH. Just an idea. That is something that I could do a little more testing on. Where I have been trying to recreate the error message on my desktop(where autopano will work from hugin) I have not been able to get that error message by messing up the paths. As far as I can remember I only have the one version of autopano all be it in two locations, one in each hugin bin. On my friends laptop I did go to preferences and set the full path to autopano and it did not change the error. When I set the full path to a place where autopano was lot located it gave me a different error message. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/0c0e5a9b-823b-44f8-ac71-da2069eb63b8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] autopano.exe return errors when run with huggin.
I have a fun little bug to run down. Between me and a friend we have two windows 7 computers with hugin installed. I have been using autopano for a while and I really like autopanos speed(yes cpfind is needed when it messes up but that is not often). On my desktop I just put them in the bin folder and then tried using them from hugin and they work as expected with no extra worries.(both 2012 and 2013 versions of hugin) On my friends laptop computer with windows 7 I put the exact same file in the bin folder of both the 2012 and 2013 version and have tried them both. In both cases I get an error popup along the lines of autopano Could not execute command: Then the error message continues by filling in this line with stuff. /allinone /path:%d /keys:%p /project:oto /name:%o /size:1024 /f %i I have checked the settings for both control point detectors and it is the same on both computers. I have tried to reproduce this error in my computer and I am not able to by removing the file or messing up the command line stuff in the control point detector options. Using google I have found the place in the source code that makes the call. search this page http://sourceforge.net/p/hugin/mailman/message/19937994/ for the phrase // This doesn't work properly - GWP It shows up 4 times. Near as I can tell 4 lines below the first two times it shows up I can find where that particular error message is be displayed by hugin. I am not too good with C++, near as I can tell that error should only pop up if there are too many pictures and probably not even then. I have tried running autopano on my friends computer with just 2 pictures and as many as 20, both get the same error. I have not tried it with over 127. (on mine it works no matter how many I have tested) Any thoughts? Would this be a bug of some kind or did I somehow mess up installing it? Any thoughts on a work around or a fix? Thanks, Brandon -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/767fe8d8-8eec-4b27-8623-2559fa1cae80%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Looking for a tutorial on pto files
Thanks that is exactly what I was looking for. For some reason I never even saw the doc folder(I had to have seen it, I just never stopped to look at it). I am doing some odd things such as making cubes or taking cubes and making them into an equalrectangle and other things that near as I can tell are not supported by the command line programs. So far anything that I have wanted to do Bruno has made a pear script to do. Where I do not get along with peal I have been reworking most of them into AutoIT3. The main advantage being that it is easy to make any kind of a GUI and some pretty complex scripts with AutoIT3 and then I can have it run command line commands with nona to do the work. (the main down side is that it will only work on a windows machine, I am actually getting some pretty good performance out of it.) I am wanting a better understanding of what is in the PTO files to make it easier when I translate one of Bruno's scripts for AutoIT3 to work with. Plus if I understand what is happening well enough I hope to be able to add new features to the hugin scripting community. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/65e04a92-f24b-4c5d-abb9-635f1f568591%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Exposure fused from any arrangement problem
I do not see a problem on the right, but I could be over looking something the big thing that I see is center left all of the white around the windows and the street light. They look like the camera shuck on a long exposure image(i know that is not what happened here) Does it do it on a low range stitch? I am wondering if your control points between the images have some issues and are not quite lined up. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/0a5bb55c-7308-4c6d-b2b9-9d3a6831bdbb%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Looking for a tutorial on pto files
Messing around with the nona and the command line I have acquired an interest in learning more about what is inside a pto file. I have opened them with text editors and I have figured out most of it. http://archive.bigben.id.au/tutorials/360/readme/index.html Also helped. There are variables in the PTO files that hugin creates that I have not been able to find an explanation for. Is there somewhere that I can go to read up on PTO files as hugin understands them? -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/2ecf6aa8-915a-4ea5-a146-3e01c1597b1d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Problem with GL preview
I get this problem from time to time. When it is messed up, if I go through the preview one image at a time I generally find that it is caused by just a few pictures and not all of them are a mess. Near as I can tell it is caused when optimizing some of the lens parameters(I have not narrowed it down to a single one yet, currently I am thinking that any of the lens settings can mess it up). My work around has been to either ingorne it as it does not show up in the final pano or use the other preview. If I really want to use the GL preview I have found that reseting the lens parameters and optimizing again will solve the problem almost every time. For debugging I find this in both the 2012 and 2013 versions. As far as lens on the camera I have found it with every camera that I have used, a point and shoot as well as a 30mm and 12 mm(after adjusting for sensor size) lens. I am pretty sure the problem is that the GL preview has a problem with the lens optimizations from time to time. At one point I went through and messed up the settings one at a time to see what each does and it is easy to take a normal good looking pano and make it look like modern art with the GL preview. To do that take any good pano, go to the lens tab and change any of the lens settings by 2 or more whole numbers and it will be way out of whack, some times it takes a lot less. Near as I can tell the other preview does not do it. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/54db0cda-a016-463b-a8b3-768b6dd99558%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[hugin-ptx] Re: unblended triangle in fused version?
Thanks for the tip on using the newer version of enblend. I have not stitched enough since switching to say if it has solved the problem or not, but I have not seen it yet so I am hopeful. Another possibility is that neighbouring images overlap so much that, despite A being largely to the left of B, some parts of remapped A are off to the right of B, again giving them the chance to appear in the final composite when they should be covered up (this isn't likely in your single row pano). Actually I think that may be exactly what happened. That pano and the others are full 360 by 180s and the down row can have a lot of over excessive overlap. Putting the images in shot order or overlapping a little less could stop the first case happening. Or you could use a href= http://horman.net/multiblend;multiblend/a ;) I am very interested in multiblend. The idea of something that is as much faster as it claims to be has my full interest but I have not been able to figure out how to get hugin to use it. I have put it in the bin folder but after that I am at a loss as far as how to tell hugin to use it. There are some settings under preferences that look like they should do the trick, but near as I can tell when I change them it is still using enblend. Any tips on how to install multiblend so that hugin will use it? Thanks all, Brandon -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/82bf656b-b1a1-4355-955d-03b249a361f8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
