Hi Bill,
Please reduce the NAT table size from Configuration - NAT, to 1024 and try it
out.
Thanks,
Chitrang Srivastava
Cambium Networks
From: Chitrang Srivastava
Sent: 15 July 2015 07:38:49
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Software 13.4: P8 FSK
We use sentinel 111S08080028C34.. They are very solid, I've never had a problem
with them in over a decade.. http://www.sentinelconn.com/
-PK
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:55 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject:
BTW, these guys are a great source for Sentinel connectors (can't vouch for
how competitive they are on price):
http://www.rj45s.com/
Also, my limited experience with Sentinel connectors is to use their crimp
tool or at least a high quality one, or you could bend the contacts instead
of
I know some of you have been dreaming of this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqHrTtvFFIs
I'm expecting it to work decently or better on 2.5. They've delivered so
far. Just be careful until then - it's not simply three commands away
right now!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 15, 2015 8:41 PM, Mathew Howard
I have not found the price to vary much on the EZ connectors. I think a lot
of the price must be a royalty payment to Sullstar.
http://www.google.com/patents/US5996224
I usually order from somewhere I am ordering something else to combine
shipping, also prefer the jars of 50. Usually I get
The AUX port DOES support alignment tone, but it’s an RJ-45 connector now, so
the cable or adapter to connect the headset is a bit different.
That spec sheet is a bit of a typo, and a new one will be posted… although it’s
worth noting that the PTP 450i will go a LONG way, with high gain
We put up a 3.65 connectorized SM with a tan Mars 15x15 panel oriented like a
diamond, on some customer’s upscale house that was the exact same color. He
was very happy. I just hope he doesn’t tell all his neighbors and they want it
too, because it was really too expensive by the time you add
OK, I should have stopped reading at “450 Platform Key Features”.
From: Matt Mangriotis
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 11:39 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i
Ken – The press release says that the PMP 450 platform supports 3.65 GHz… is
that what you’re referring to?
Thanks Matt.
When can we expect our vendors to have stock of these?
Thanks
Adam
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Mangriotis
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:39 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i
The download site is busted (again).
Does the Multifunction AUX port mean that the alignment tone is gone?
The PTP 450i says the maximum deployment range is Up to 58 to 400 miles
minimum, depending on configuration
Is that a typo?
On 7/15/2015 12:03 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
Production ramp up is occurring now, but it might
WTF is that harness.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Under my umbrella
On Jul 14, 2015 8:26 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:
i
If I were to say that there would be a 12” square flat panel (think about the
PMP 450i integrated SM tilted at a 45 degree) for 3.65 GHz available, would
there be strong interest in this from this crowd?
It would be somewhat more expensive, but would have an integrated 19 dBi flat
panel
There is no Lite AP for PMP 450i.
Matt
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 12:03 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i
Key question, is there a 'lite' version of these new AP's? What does it cost?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at
and the PoE injector is an ice cream cone?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Mangriotis matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent:
looks like a 8 yr old did the install
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Justin Wilson - MTIN li...@mtin.net
wrote:
Looks like a rubber roof. I bet they had all sorts of comments about not
doing anything to that rubber roof. Anytime i ever had a rubber membrane
roof it was always pointed
Here is why I recommended upgrading to the latest. If I have a problem client
like that and some troubleshooting doesn’t fix it I upgrade just that client to
the latest. Mikrotik routinely leaves things out of the changeling that were
fixed. They are getting better. WMM support has been an
Looks like a rubber roof. I bet they had all sorts of comments about not doing
anything to that rubber roof. Anytime i ever had a rubber membrane roof it was
always pointed out how “fragile” that roof was and how expensive it was. Sure
a mount like the other one with a longer mast would
Depends on how you see cost. How fast you want ROI.
On 07/15/2015 01:59 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:
That would help our Self-Install customers a lot.
If it ends up to be much more expensive than SM + $60 reflector dish,
it may not be desirable. Cost is a big motivator.
On 7/15/2015 1:44 PM,
Self-install always gives me the heebie-jeebies, maybe it’s just a matter of
spelling out we don’t come out for free and fix problems that were caused by
your install job, and we don’t let your poor signal bog down the whole AP.
Anyway, I’m seeing more and more of these metal roofs on
You mean you want to see some test results where in-band, but off
channel noise hurts a competitor, but doesn't hurt the 450i? So would I.
On 7/15/2015 3:32 PM, Peter Kranz wrote:
This sounds good.. but you guys should show us the numbers on both
claims.. Jideally PMP450 vs PMP450i vs EPMP
I've done it once and it's worked out great. Maybe I'll keep it at once. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com
To:
Everything but the firmware for 5150. I'd imagine they're waiting on DFS
approval to just do one firmware release.
Replacing UBNT with ePMP? That's what I've been doing.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
Can you see what's going on with the update to AC2 Robert promised before
end of June (two weeks ago)?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
Hi Ken -
We are planning
Gotcha! They don’t like expensive roofs that look nice, just expensive roofs
that don’t leak. ☺
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:53 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Purewave 365
Ones that don't leak at any rate.
On
That's the only way to do it now. It sucks since I want to replace some
single pol Mikrotik APs with dual pol, it would be preferred to jump to
dual pol Wifi with epmp and then when all the CPEs are moved, go from Wifi
to TDD.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
M5 as well. I got the stickers and code a couple week ago.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday,
M5 approvals for lower band are done. DFS testing complete, just pending
approval.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
Is M5 also done except for firmware? Or are you talking about AC
Nano/PowerBeams?
The silence on this matter is very frustrating. The
Would like to see more information about the 450i interference mitigation
advances over the 450.. and PPS/Throughput improvements over the 450.
Peter Kranz
http://www.unwiredltd.com/ www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-
mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com
Yes...Was just discussing this.
There was an initial update already in AC2 and next update is planned by
end of July (addition of AC, AF, etc...).
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Can you see what's going on with the update to AC2 Robert promised
I don't know about fragile. I have a 300 for tier right next to my
building. Last winter I listened to huge chunks of ice fall on it as it
thawed for two days. Forth day I went up to take a look. I couldn't tell
anything had ever happened to it. Looked as good as new with the exception
of a bit
The throughput issues with both bridge mode and especially NAT mode was
resolved with 13.2. I think Aaron posted
some screenshots while they were working on it. If your linktest gets you say
60x20Mbps, you can get very close to
that in bridge mode, NAT mode is slightly less, but it's not as
Same here on self install. I tried it 4 times that I recall. One did
everything right, one did everything wrong and needed lots of help, one
did everything ok except he didn't plug in the PoE correctly (and was a
major ass on the phone about it not working, and didn't have the decency
to
Yes, but I would go with a more traditional case and panel approach. Our
customer don't really care about industrial design. Price has to make sense.
Maybe have the Epmp department help with that one..
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 15, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Matt Mangriotis
This sounds good.. but you guys should show us the numbers on both claims.. :)
ideally PMP450 vs PMP450i vs EPMP and for extra credit RocketM5-AC and
M5-AC-Lite.
Peter Kranz
http://www.unwiredltd.com/ www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-
It depends on where you're at and if fiber is likely to get there.
That's also the attractiveness of the ePMP platform... it's paid for before the
caulk dries.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
Anybody know, has there been any change in status regarding U-NII-1? I've
searched the UBNT Forums and can't find anything other than SOON.
Ignoring AC series and just focusing on M5, last I heard the products
capable of operating in 5150-5250 (without buying bootleg INTL versions)
were
Swap the CPE first?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:50:10 PM
Hi Ken -
We are planning M series release with U-NII-1 prior to DFS
(NanoBeam/PowerBeam). Last I heard beta SW will be ~1-2 weeks.
Backwards compatibility for AC/M series is in works. I have asked SW team
for update on release.
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Mike Hammett
Ones that don't leak at any rate.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 1:27 PM James Howard ja...@litewire.net wrote:
So you’re telling us that aside from being obsessive they also like REALLY
expensive roofs?
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman
*Sent:* Wednesday, July
Came with lift ...I have a belt with lanyards around waist. No need for
my tower system.
On Jul 15, 2015 12:23 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
WTF is that harness.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On
We’re employing what we’re calling Dynamic Interference Filtering in this
platform… this is actually circuitry that “wraps around” the selected operating
channel, effectively isolation noise from all other frequencies. Once you
change channels, this filter moves with it. Because this is an
So you're telling us that aside from being obsessive they also like REALLY
expensive roofs?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:59 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Purewave 365
My building is about 6000 sqft and five years
On 7/15/15 12:27, James Howard wrote:
So you�re telling us that aside from being obsessive they also like
REALLY expensive roofs?
I get that the attraction is you can have water pond in them and it
won't leak, but they are really fragile for the price. I frequently see
them riddled with
They apparently have preliminary approval and have started sending out
labels, but as of right now there is no movement on firmware development
that includes those frequencies. It sounds to me like the OOBE
requirements probably make the radios perform like crap, so they are going
back and forth
Same here. Unfortunately Wifi mode doesn't work at all on the AP. That's
coming in 2.5 which is supposed to be this year.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote:
Is M5 also done except for firmware? Or are you talking about AC
Nano/PowerBeams?
The silence on this matter is very frustrating. The theories about
incorporating DFS and/or trying to make the performance under the new rules not
suck sound plausible. But I’m reluctant to buy or deploy any
Is the aux port 802.3af output using the data+power scheme on two pairs
leaving the spare pairs for timing port sync, tone, etc? Or does the
software switch completely change the port from 802.3af to legacy timing
port mode?
On 7/15/2015 5:21 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
Maybe I am being less
The throughput issues with both bridge mode and especially NAT mode was
resolved with 13.2. I think Aaron posted some screenshots while they
were working on it. If your linktest gets you say 60x20Mbps, you can get
very close to that in bridge mode, NAT mode is slightly less, but it's
not as
Key question, is there a 'lite' version of these new AP's? What does it
cost?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Matt Mangriotis
matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com wrote:
These are two different products, addressing different markets. Cambium
is hard at work getting new products released
Production ramp up is occurring now, but it might take some time. I would
expect deliveries to start mid-August.
Matt
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 11:49 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i
Thanks Matt.
Are there any MSRP prices available yet on this gear?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Matt Mangriotis
matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com wrote:
These are two different products, addressing different markets. Cambium is
hard at work getting new products released at an increased rate, all
Sync only via CMM ?
UGPS and other timing-port sync not supported ?
2015-07-15 17:55 GMT+03:00 Matt Mangriotis
matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com:
These are two different products, addressing different markets. Cambium
is hard at work getting new products released at an increased rate,
Agreed, I have walked on membrane roofs that seemed extremely tough, no signs
of damage or degradation even after many years in service. Plus they’re white!
And stay white. Big savings on A/C costs.
If they are riddled with tiny holes, I’m guessing they are very old, or
somebody cut
It has an AUX port that is Rj-45. No more Rj-11.
On 7/15/2015 3:45 PM, Pavel Lyuty wrote:
Sync only via CMM ?
UGPS and other timing-port sync not supported ?
2015-07-15 17:55 GMT+03:00 Matt Mangriotis
matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com
mailto:matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com:
Damn auto correct.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 3:17 PM Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
Agreed, I have walked on membrane roofs that seemed extremely tough, no
signs of damage or degradation even after many years in service. Plus
they’re white! And stay white. Big savings on A/C costs.
If
I know I had Mikrotik and Ubnt (NSM2 maybe even Beam400). WiFi is not
ready yet.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 15, 2015 8:09 PM, Mathew Howard mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm... weird, I think the most I had on an AP was 5
It was also 5ghz in my case... that also probably makes a difference. That
probably explains why it can't be enabled through the GUI yet.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
I know I had Mikrotik and Ubnt (NSM2 maybe even Beam400). WiFi is not
I feel sorry for Forrest
From: Matt Mangriotis
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:21 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i
Maybe I am being less than clear, so apologies for that.
There are two RJ-45 ports on this product:
1 port is Data/Power (i.e. the main port)
1
Why? I have no doubt he can make a 450i SyncInjector out of his gigabit
version. Granted, it's a change to 48/56VDC and port pinout, but he
already did that with the 320/430 SyncInjector anyway, although that
wasn't gigabit. The other thing he's talked about, a managed device that
puts out
Wifi mode actually does work on the ePMP APs - it's just kind of a pain to
enabie (you have to do it through the command line), but it seems to work
fine... I've used it a few times to convert towers from UBNT to ePMP.
I can dig up the commands if you want to know how to do it.
On Wed, Jul 15,
Uh it doesn't work. At all. I had 18 CPEs that would associate but 100
kbps was peak throughout. Mikrotik was solid before but with G rates and
one polarity it was about time to upgrade.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 15,
hmm... weird, I think the most I had on an AP was 5 CPEs, but they seemed
to work fine, and none of the customers complained. All the clients were
nanobridges, if that makes a difference.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Uh it doesn't work. At
Mine was also 5 GHz. I should have said NSM5 but that damn auto correct.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 15, 2015 8:16 PM, Mathew Howard mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:
It was also 5ghz in my case... that also probably makes a
It might just not be able to handle more than a few clients very well
then... or it didn't like the Mikrotiks... or I was just lucky. Whatever
the case, I'm definitely going to be careful where I use it until they get
it working right.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Josh Luthman
Maybe I am being less than clear, so apologies for that.
There are two RJ-45 ports on this product:
1 port is Data/Power (i.e. the main port)
1 port is AUX, which has (or will have) many functions, among them is
input/output of the sync pulse (i.e. UGPS)
In summary, the radio supports “sync
Good questions.
Both CMM4 and UGPS are supported with 450i. True, the 6-pin port became a
RJ-45 port, so the pinout is different.
Hopefully a sync pipe can be powered by this port?
For connecting the CMM4, because the 450i is now powered by 802.3at PoE,
you’ll need the 56 VDC power
Timing on the power port?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Mangriotis
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450d vs. 450i
Good questions.
Both CMM4 and UGPS are supported with 450i. True, the 6-pin port became a
RJ-45
I was about to ask thatdoes moving to 802.3at hurt that at all?
On 7/15/2015 5:50 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
Timing on the power port?
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt Mangriotis
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:27 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG]
Strong interest, yes, if you can get our cost on it to no more than $350
or so. If it's going to cost more than buying a connectorized SM and a
panel antenna, the only reason I'd still be interested in it is to not
have to weather seal RF pigtails, but that isn't worth $100-200. And I'm
going
Very good write up Faisal.
Cogent is a perfect example of how to start a network and peer with anyone and
everyone you can. Back in the early 2000’s Cogent’s business model was to peer
with anyone who would. They were selling dirt cheap Internet then. I was
buying a server in Chicago on a
Right across they mounted mast Same type roof
On Jul 15, 2015 7:58 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 7/15/15 6:37 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Customers with that type of roof are often obsessive.
That's putting it far too nicely.
~Seth
Hummm that sprctrum looks much better and I'd expect it to perform a lot
better too.
What's the recieve signal? Still -63?
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015, Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com wrote:
the spectrum is now without peaks, but low bandwith..
2015-07-15 15:37 GMT+02:00 Sean
Well, there you go. The counterargument to installing new FW right away.
From: Nate Burke
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:45 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netflix app on iPad keeps asking to reconnect
6.30.1 is already released as a bugfix too.
On 7/15/2015 9:42 AM, Ken
What is everyone using for shielded and unshielded cat-5 connectors
and where are you getting them? We currently use mostly EZ which are
very expensive. For anyone else using EZ what is the cheapest source
you have found for them?
Press release says it includes 3.65 GHz, I wonder what is the FCC approval
status on that? Given that band is kind of in regulatory limbo now until the
new rules and spectrum access database get worked out.
From: Matt
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 10:30 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re:
hit me off list t...@voltbb.com
On Jul 15, 2015 8:55 AM, Matt matt.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
What is everyone using for shielded and unshielded cat-5 connectors
and where are you getting them? We currently use mostly EZ which are
very expensive. For anyone else using EZ what is the
Hi Lewis,
I believe we have a few. My business partner Alan (alan at zirkel dot us)
will be contacting you off list.
-sean
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015, Lewis Bergman lewis.berg...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have I needed for a very low bandwidth link, about two Mbs, and it is
isolated enough
Why do you have the frequency fixed ? It says you have issues with the
wireless conditions. If you have LOS then it is either multipath or
interference. Why not set it to applied freq changes and let it do it's
magic?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 6:50 AM Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com
wrote:
link planner tolds me 240 mbit and that is what i need :( i will try idfs
2015-07-15 15:00 GMT+02:00 David dmilho...@wletc.com:
Unfortunately I do not think there is an upgrade to expand the band on the
PTP600.
Depending on how much throughput you really need you could try a smaller
channel
Did you enter an appropriate interference db?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 7:12 AM Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com
wrote:
with idfs same low bandwith..we have on this tower 4 PTP 600 maybe we
should TDM Traffic?
2015-07-15 15:01 GMT+02:00 Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com:
link
did somebody have them used?
On 7/15/15 6:37 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Customers with that type of roof are often obsessive.
That's putting it far too nicely.
~Seth
Definitely looks as if there is some interference possibly some OOB from
some adj site
On 07/15/2015 07:50 AM, Daniel Gerlach wrote:
can somebody have a look on the pictures and can tell why the
modulation is so low :(
spectrum is free..and LOS
what does this peaks can be..
THX a lot
Unfortunately I do not think there is an upgrade to expand the band on
the PTP600.
Depending on how much throughput you really need you could try a smaller
channel size.
On 07/15/2015 07:50 AM, Daniel Gerlach wrote:
can somebody have a look on the pictures and can tell why the
modulation is
That is a TPL roof. I put one on a few years ago and it is very expensive.
Having said that, a non poem mount works on them just like anything else.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 8:14 PM Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Saw this on top of an Army barracks. Installed by Chaparral Wireless
with idfs same low bandwith..we have on this tower 4 PTP 600 maybe we
should TDM Traffic?
2015-07-15 15:01 GMT+02:00 Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com:
link planner tolds me 240 mbit and that is what i need :( i will try idfs
2015-07-15 15:00 GMT+02:00 David dmilho...@wletc.com:
thx david i will try
2015-07-15 15:26 GMT+02:00 David dmilho...@wletc.com:
I would try link planner with all 4 links in there with the PTP-sync
selected and see what you get.
If they are all ptp600 then using ptpsync with them should help to resolve
any near/close interference of your self
On the local side you have a lot of noise. Although the the constant
noise on the channel shows as -90-ish (shown as the solid blue bars) the
radio is seeing -70-ish peak noise (shown as the black I beams). Your
receive signal is -63 so you only have about 10db signal above the noise.
If you
Give surplus a call
1-888-490-3645
https://swginc.net/
On 07/15/2015 08:22 AM, Daniel Gerlach wrote:
did somebody have them used?
Are these coming for the 2.4 and 3.5 GHZ bands? 900 MHZ?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Matt Mangriotis
matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com wrote:
These are two different products, addressing different markets. Cambium
is hard at work getting new products released at an increased rate,
Yeah they max out way before the AP does...30meg might be rightbut
we're not usually selling more than that to one customer.
There's room in the market for a higher end SM for sure.
On 7/15/2015 11:22 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Higher peak Tx power also brings about higher Tx power at max
Hi George,
Did you get chance to check Gps sync issue with 13.4 Build?
From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of George Skorup geo...@cbcast.com
Sent: 14 July 2015 10:23:46
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Software 13.4: P8 FSK not recommended
Thanks, I guess I’ll have to try that.
I can’t keep up. I thought 6.29 was the latest.
From: Justin Wilson - MTIN
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 6:48 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netflix app on iPad keeps asking to reconnect
Here is why I recommended upgrading to the latest. If
If the noise is -73 you're at 10 snr...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 15, 2015 10:48 AM, Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com wrote:
yes still -63
2015-07-15 16:05 GMT+02:00 Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us:
Hummm that
*nods* The press release prompted the question.
It seems like a 450di would be the ideal 450 CPE. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Mangriotis
changedetection.org is your friend...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015
6.30.1 is already released as a bugfix too.
On 7/15/2015 9:42 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Thanks, I guess I’ll have to try that.
I can’t keep up. I thought 6.29 was the latest.
*From:* Justin Wilson - MTIN mailto:li...@mtin.net
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 6:48 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
yes still -63
2015-07-15 16:05 GMT+02:00 Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us:
Hummm that sprctrum looks much better and I'd expect it to perform a lot
better too.
What's the recieve signal? Still -63?
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015, Daniel Gerlach danielgerl...@gmail.com wrote:
the spectrum is
My building is about 6000 sqft and five years ago it cost about $90k to put
mine on.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 8:37 AM Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jul 15, 2015 7:58 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 7/15/15 6:37 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Customers with that type
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
