Kevin,
You should not have Admin01 in the same DB as the rest of the servers if
it's not in the server group, for exactly the type of thing you are
discussingbeing in the server group allows the server group to manage
what element are enabled how/when/etcso yesthe escalations would
There are 5 admin servers. For my question I will refer to them as the
following:
Admin01 - Not in Server Group
Admin02 - In Server Group
Admin03 - In Server Group
Admin04 - In Server Group
Admin05 - In Server Group
Admin04 is configured as the primary for Escalations in the Operation
...
William Rentfrow
wrentf...@stratacominc.com
Office: 715-204-3061 or 701-232-5697x25
Cell: 715-498-5056
From: William Rentfrow
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:37 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Workflow problem in a server group
Hi listers -
Basic setup - ARS 9x - ITSM 9 on Linux
Hi listers -
Basic setup - ARS 9x - ITSM 9 on Linux with Oracle.
In our development server group we have two servers. For some reason RKM will
not work as expected. I would enter a customer, summary, description in a new
incident and click "Search Knowledge Base". The global
Dear all,
The SLM8.0 installer,in one of the installation screens, requests you to
agree that "proceeding with the installation any customizations that are
not in overlays or custom objects" will be overwitten. But this is an
installation in a secondary server (server group) and not t
overlays or custom objects" will be overwitten. But this is an
> installation in a secondary server (server group) and not the primary, and
> you can not proceed unless your click on agree.
>
> I can't chance it as it take ages to retore the database.
>
> Anyone come across this
Hi All,
Need your inputs for the below.
i. To Configure Atrium Integrator to support Failover mechanism in Server
Group what are the configurations we need to do?
in UDM:Config for primary server Is default needs to be checked? and whether
we need to provide ranking for the secondary server
@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of William Rentfrow
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:45 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Group question
**
Since you do not have a load balancer in front of it , you probably don't want
to make a server group.
Making it into a server group is pretty easy
Since you do not have a load balancer in front of it , you probably don't want
to make a server group.
Making it into a server group is pretty easy - there's step by step directions
in the docs. Basically you do this:
1. Change the server alias to your server group name - this should
it be built as a
separate AR/Midtier system and share the existing database or do I need to
somehow convert the
existing AR/Midtier system into a server group (of 1 server) and add the new
server into the group?
Thanks for any and all suggestions!
Portions of this message may be confidential
Are you going to put the servers behind a load balancer? Or are they going
directly to the servers?
You could put them in a server group at least temporarily - this will prevent
servers from stepping on each other's toes. Make sure you define the entries
in the Server Group Operation Ranking
discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of William Rentfrow
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 10:32 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server Group question
**
I've had a lot of experience with these.
First - what problem are you trying to solve by adding a server?
William
No load balancers. Testers will be accessing them directly through different
dns names. Butsince the 2003 server was
created as a standalone server (i.e. NOT in a server group...) how can I now
make it into a server group member? Do I need
to reinstall it as an actual server group and server
] On Behalf Of richard@bwc.state.oh.us
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 9:20 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Server Group question
**
I'd like to ask a question - I've read the config/install manuals and didn't
find a good definite answer in them.
We have a 7.6.04 system with an AR server
Regards,
*Carl Wilson*
*From:*Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Rick Phillips
*Sent:* 20 February 2015 22:01
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: 8.1 server group architecture
**
Thanks, LJ, I was just wondering if I could reduce my
Phillips
Sent: 20 February 2015 22:01
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: 8.1 server group architecture
**
Thanks, LJ, I was just wondering if I could reduce my upgrade/patching LOE
(throughout the server group) by using a reduced number of installed apps on
machines I don't want involved
Thanks, LJ, I was just wondering if I could reduce my upgrade/patching
LOE (throughout the server group) by using a reduced number of installed
apps on machines I don't want involved in failover. I may have to open
a ticket with support on this.
rp
On 2/20/2015 10:47 AM, LJ LongWing wrote
Hi,
8.1 ARS/Atrium/ITSM/SLM/SRM
I have a server group that consists of an admin server and a single
non-admin server. The admin server carries the load of all admin
functions, while the non-admin server is only for end users.
Recently, some of my atrium work has really been taxing
, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Rick Phillips r...@netfirst.com wrote:
Hi,
8.1 ARS/Atrium/ITSM/SLM/SRM
I have a server group that consists of an admin server and a single
non-admin server. The admin server carries the load of all admin
functions, while the non-admin server is only for end users
(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Raj
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 7:15 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Load Balancing on Remedy Server Group
**
Hello All,
Looking for some information on load balancing our remedy in server group
install.
Currently, we installed ARS v8.1
Hello All,
Looking for some information on load balancing our remedy in server group
install.
Currently, we installed ARS v8.1 in Server Group on 2 VMs(OS - Linux).
We tested some fail-over scenarios and it is working fine after we
configured entries in Server Group Operation Ranking form.
We
-498-5056
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Terry Bootsma
*Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2014 5:41 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: One Server from Server Group getting SQL error
**
Sounds definitely like an Oracle
@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Terry Bootsma
*Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2014 5:41 PM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
*Subject:* Re: One Server from Server Group getting SQL error
**
Sounds definitely like an Oracle configuration issue.
Would be interesting to open multiple sqlplus sessions using
Any ideas or suggestions on what to look at would be GREATLY appreciated.
I have two servers in a server group. When one is brought up we are fine.
When we bring the second one up, it seems to steal the DB connection. If
we recycle the first one it will take back the connection. And the server
Server from Server Group getting SQL error
**
Any ideas or suggestions on what to look at would be GREATLY appreciated.
I have two servers in a server group. When one is brought up we are fine.
When we bring the second one up, it seems to steal the DB connection. If we
recycle the first one
Goralczyk
Sent: October-27-14 4:24 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: One Server from Server Group getting SQL error
**
Any ideas or suggestions on what to look at would be GREATLY appreciated.
I have two servers in a server group. When one is brought up we are fine.
When we bring the second one up
Of Terry Bootsma
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 5:41 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: One Server from Server Group getting SQL error
**
Sounds definitely like an Oracle configuration issue.
Would be interesting to open multiple sqlplus sessions using your Oracle
Remedy-account, and see what
of things out, but I assume you
are doing these. I'm mentioning them just in case that's not true...
For #2 - when you say remove it from the server group, I assume you're
un-checking the server group member box AND changing the server name back
to the actual machine name.
And the only
All,
In previous ARS patch install instructions it was recommended that you:
1. Shut down the non-admin servers
2. Remove the admin server from the server group
o If it's on a load balancer, remove it from the LB as well
3. Disable escalations
4. Patch the admin
That's what we do. You did leave a couple of things out, but I assume you are
doing these. I'm mentioning them just in case that's not true...
For #2 - when you say remove it from the server group, I assume you're
un-checking the server group member box AND changing the server name back
LJ
If you are referring to Server-Connect-Name (in ar.cfg) then the BMC ARS 8.1
docs state it is required (unique and resolveable). Perhaps you mean something
else?
John
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
No, I'm not talking about server-connect-name, I'm talking about a now
outdated field on the Advanced tab of the Server Information console named
'Server Group Name'
According to my Config guide for 7.5, page 168
Define the common alias, unique server names, and
optional server group name
The server group field is actually deprecated. It is no longer used as of
7.6.03. So it doesn't really matter.
All the server group uses to look at the server group is the Server Group
Member checkbox and the Server alias. Also, you need to have all of the
IP-Name entries set in the ar.conf
18 mars 2014 23:15
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server group
**
It should be stored in the ar.cfg file, but it is irrelevant because the value
isn't used in server groups anymore with latest versions.
On Mar 18, 2014 4:07 PM, Marika René
marika.r...@ikea.commailto:marika.r...@ikea.com
Hi Remedy experts!
A quick and simple question regarding server group...
In AR System Administration: Server Information form the Advanced tab is there
a field called Server group name. Where is this value stored? I would like to
find out if this value has changed by looking at old version
It should be stored in the ar.cfg file, but it is irrelevant because the
value isn't used in server groups anymore with latest versions.
On Mar 18, 2014 4:07 PM, Marika René marika.r...@ikea.com wrote:
**
Hi Remedy experts!
A quick and simple question regarding server group...
In AR
balancing...I don't have any experience with
setup and configuration of one, but I imagine it's not exceedingly
difficult :)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Sivarama Velicheti vsivar...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Group,
We have a server group environment but not leveraging load
balancing
. The server group ranking form let's you designate certain
systems for certain server side functions (e.g., escalations, email,
approval); this does not apply to end users.
If you want to balance your load on either the AR tier or the web tier, you
will need to use a load balancer. I suppose you could
Hi Group,
We have a server group environment but not leveraging load balancing
capabilities. Here is a brief overview on the production servers we have in
place. I am trying to understand or find some documentation to best utilize the
servers we have at hand. We have 3 application
Hello List,
A question was striking in my mind whats the difference between server group
and load balancer in remedy?
Can we have a load balancer without server group ?
Can we have a server group without load balancer
**
Load balancer without server group, assuming means with one Remedy server. You could be using the load balancer but it isn't really balancing anything, just taking a signal and passing it to a server.
Server Group without Load Balancer is more common. If you want one server for Users to access
same options file after changing
server name ,hostname and BMC_DATABASE_OPTION as ServerGrooup it could
complete the installation as I got the below error.
Anyone performed ARS server group installation using silent mode before , let
me know your comments, also wish to hear LIST suggestion
tried to install second ARS server using same options file after changing
server name ,hostname and BMC_DATABASE_OPTION as ServerGrooup it could
complete the installation as I got the below error.
Anyone performed ARS server group installation using silent mode before ,
let me know your
Dears,
please advise, I'd like to add a new server to my server group, is there any
document guide clarify how to do thar?.
Thanks
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives
A few changes
At.conf -
Server group member : T
Update Server group name and properties as per server group
update db details - login I'd,pw , server details as per group
Decide on what threads it will be running and adjust accordingly in
armonitor.conf
Update SG operations ranking form
That's
Typo: there is nothing at.conf
Its *ar.conf
On Feb 26, 2014 8:22 AM, Vaibhav Singhal vaibh.arsl...@gmail.com wrote:
A few changes
At.conf -
Server group member : T
Update Server group name and properties as per server group
update db details - login I'd,pw , server details as per group
I haven't done licensing for a while, but don't you also require a server
group tag in the AR System license for that server? Or is that need
eliminated in the newer versions?
Joe
_
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf
That's not needed, but you do need a server license
On Feb 25, 2014 5:01 PM, Joe D'Souza jdso...@shyle.net wrote:
**
I haven't done licensing for a while, but don't you also require a server
group tag in the AR System license for that server? Or is that need
eliminated in the newer versions
Yes I have a foggy memory of why the server group tag was used in the
license information - I think it was just to categorize the licenses to
visibly identify them when reconciling them in the license files. Yes you
certainly have to license the server for it work be it in a server group
discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Saji Philip
Sent: 11 February 2014 23:26
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: FTS and Remedy 8.1 in a Server Group
**
Is anyone out there installed RKM in v. 8.1.002 and in a Server Group and
FTS enabled? We are having issues where
Is anyone out there installed RKM in v. 8.1.002 and in a Server Group and
FTS enabled? We are having issues where the indexing is hung. I noticed
there is a 8.1.01 ARS now available and it addresses some issues with FTS,
but in the notes it mentioned that 'in a Server Group environment
In a server group the email engine runs on all of the servers but is put in a
suspended state on all but the highest ranked. Should the highest ranked AR
server fail then the next highest ranked email engine is signalled (by its AR
server) to resume processing. When the higher ranked server
Hi All,
I have two servers in a server group. I stopped one of the servers and then
restarted. Came up fine except for the email engine. Connection refused, to
host. Currently the second server is handling the email and connects to the
mailbox on a Linux server. Could this be normal? Only one
understanding..
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Brittain, Mark mbritt...@navisite.comwrote:
**
Hi All,
I have two servers in a server group. I stopped one of the servers and
then restarted. Came up fine except for the email engine. Connection
refused, to host. Currently the second server
Yes, and the service does NOT auto-start if the other one stops, Doug
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brittain, Mark
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:02 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Email engine is a server group
**
Hi All
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:08 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email engine is a server group
**
Yes, and the service does NOT auto-start if the other one stops, Doug
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brittain, Mark
Sent
, January 30, 2014 3:27 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email engine is a server group
**
Hi Doug LJ,
On Linux 5. Did a ps -ef|grep 'mail' and got this. Any idea what it means?
root 27974 5433 0 14:15 ? 00:00:00 sendmail: server server name [server ip]
cmd read
thanks
Mark
-Original
@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 4:32 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email engine is a server group
That means the server's sendmail daemon is running
The ARS Email Engine would show up as a java process running emaildaemon.jar
Fred
Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brittain, Mark
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:49 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email engine is a server group
Hi Fred,
I can see the emaildaemon.jar but would that confirm
So we currently have 6 AR servers in a server group - I'm adding some more.
Two of the new servers will be solely to support reporting.
I'm sort of mulling my options. I do not need them to be in the server group -
at least in the sense of taking over any functions if a task goes down
at 8:41 AM, William Rentfrow
wrentf...@stratacominc.com wrote:
**
So we currently have 6 AR servers in a server group - I'm adding some more.
Two of the new servers will be solely to support reporting.
I'm sort of mulling my options. I do not need them to be in the server
group
: Re: Adding servers to the server group
**
William,
I can't verify this...but I'm not entirely sure you need to install ITSM on the
reporting boxesI honestly don't know for sure...but being the users won't
actually be 'working' in this environment, they may just need a Remedy instance
that can
William,
My strong suggestion is to add the servers as regular servers in the server
group.
Then, just don't have them behind the interactive load balancer but maybe a
reporting load balancer. So,
regular interactive traffic is not directed to them.
Point mid-tiers for interactive use
suggestion is to add the servers as regular servers in the
server group.
Then, just don't have them behind the interactive load balancer but maybe
a reporting load balancer. So,
regular interactive traffic is not directed to them.
Point mid-tiers for interactive use at the interactive load
either can limit the records
returned - or you can't. In a server group it's fairly reasonable to have that
setting the same for all servers, or it would be confusing to the user base.
Hence, we went this direction to have new servers, etc.
It's also fair to point out that when I say Reporting
that are in the server group with their special
type of connection to do the
throttling that you are describing.
My point is just that those severs are IN the server group.
They are NOT behind the interactive load balancer so they would not be used for
interactive queries.
You still access them
Thanks for all of that :)
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 12:45 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Adding servers to the server group
**
This includes the response to LGs question
. And it always did.
We also 'logically' isolated servers in the server group to be 'user' servers
(mid-tier pools) and separated them from the CMDB and 'reporting' servers in
the server group.
Thanks!
.: Mike T :.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist
Hi listers,
Trying to understand below things and your help in the same is appreciated:
1.*Server group Installation*
I want to install server group in this fashion because of reduced
timelines.
a)Install Server 1
b)Start performing data load and other configurations
Karthik,
Running two independent Remedy applications against the same DB is possible,
and supported, but has caveats, like the fact that you don't want escalations
enabled on both machines. You will want to read up on the configuration in the
server group documentation before embarking down
escalations enabled on both machines. You will want to read up on the
configuration in the server group documentation before embarking down this
road
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Karthik
Sent
to care about the lack
of proper statistics :) I've run secondary servers on the same DB without
being in a server group for various reasons over the years and have not noticed
any long standing negative impacts.
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList
For number 1 - if you're using the ARS Server group install (as LJ noted) you
need to refer to the documentation. You would use the ranking forms to
determine which server is the primary for each function (ie email) and which is
secondary - with that, both servers will have the function active
Thanks to Both. Yes, i have implemented server group per BMC guide for a
different customer who gave us good amount of time :) however, this
customer hav given a strict deadline and i am trying to see what are the
options.
Pritch,
so, if i understand your response to 2nd question correctly, you
to pick up the new encrypted password
immediately.
- Original Message -
From: Karthik karthik...@gmail.com
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 1:00:21 PM
Subject: Re: Various Questions related to DSO, Atrium Integrator, Server Group
Installation)
**
Thanks to Both. Yes
we are upgrading our 7.5.00 patch3 to patch 8. This is my first time patching
a server group. I was wondering if we have to take the servers out of the
group in order to run the patch.
thanks
___
UNSUBSCRIBE
in a server group
To upgrade servers that are a part of a server group, follow these
guidelines:
Stop all BMC Remedy AR System servers except the server that owns the
administrative operation.
To check this, open the Configuration tab on the AR System Administration:
Server Information form
Hi William
Thanks for sharing your experience. A couple of questions these parameters need
to set in all the AR Server or only on the secondary servers.
Secondly should be take the primary server out of the server group before
upgrading or it doesn't matter till we select overwrite during
that it dont start
along with other dependent service.
Ravi Rai
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 06:32:14 -0600
From: lj.longwing@mda.mil
Subject: Re: Upgrade ARS 7.1 to 7.6.04 SP2 in server group
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Jaya,
I experienced a similar issue with recent upgrades...and what I found
@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of jaya munjal
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 4:44 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Upgrade ARS 7.1 to 7.6.04 SP2 in server group
**
Hi List
We are trying to upgrade our environment (5 ARS in a server group mode) with
email engine installed on all ARS servers. The problem we
Okay, a couple of things..I have been in the middle of this in Linux and
experienced every problem imaginable. Fortunately we now have a good path to
work from.
First, if you are upgrading in a server group only the primary server should be
running when ARS is upgraded. All others should
, July 05, 2012 10:35 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Failing: AIE 7.1 on SuSE Linux Server Group Environment - Help Please
A colleague and I are stumped on this. We've done our best to review BMC
knowledge articles, did the Google thing, have a ticket open with BMC (very
little success, slow
in server group
**
Hi List
We are trying to upgrade our environment (5 ARS in a server group mode) with
email engine installed on all ARS servers. The problem we see is upgrading the
secondary servers if we select email engine along with the ARS server in the
server group mode.
Below
Jaya,
Also set the start option Manual during installation so that it dont start
along with other dependent service.
Ravi Rai
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 06:32:14 -0600
From: lj.longwing@mda.mil
Subject: Re: Upgrade ARS 7.1 to 7.6.04 SP2 in server group
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Jaya,
I
Hi List
We are trying to upgrade our environment (5 ARS in a server group mode) with
email engine installed on all ARS servers. The problem we see is upgrading the
secondary servers if we select email engine along with the ARS server in the
server group mode.
Below are the steps we
and changing the URL...
Thanks for the help,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Nau, Michael
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 5:58 PM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Server group alias in notification web URL
Thanks guys,
I'll have a look at the implications of changing the server names
] On Behalf Of Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 5:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server group alias in notification web URL
Michael,
The server sends the notification out as it 'knows itself'so if it
knows itself via name1 instead of the group alias...that is what
A colleague and I are stumped on this. We've done our best to review BMC
knowledge articles, did the Google thing, have a ticket open with BMC (very
little success, slow at responding too)...We appreciate any help!
Brief background:
We installed AIE 7.1 patch008 in a SuSE Linux 10, SERVER GROUP
Michael,
Check out BMC Remedy Action Request System 7.6.04 Configuration Guide, page
125. I think this is what you are looking for. Add the URL of your AR server
group (e.g. http://server group name/arsys)
Email Notifications Web Path
Specifies the base URL that appears in email notifications
Mike,
I already changed that parameter on both servers, but it doesn't affect
the URL generated for notifications (I didn't restart the system though,
because changing the default web path doesn't require a restart either).
From what I read in the server group config guide, I think
Sorry, just for clarification: It does affect the base URL, but not the
server parameter in the URL
From: Nau, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:55 AM
To: 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG'
Subject: RE: Server group alias in notification web URL
Mike,
I already changed that parameter on both
Hi List,
we have two servers running ARS 7.0.01 as a group, and one MidTier
server running V7.5.
On SYS:Notification Messages I have configured Incident Assignment
Notifications to include both an artask attachment for fullclient users
and a web URL for midtier users.
The server parameter
You'll need to add a filter on ar system email messages to perform a replace
action on the body of the message to update the URL with the correct name.
On submit if
'Plain Text Body' LIKE %server=x% AND 'Message Type' = Outgoing
Set fields
Plain Text Body = REPLACE($Plain Text Body$,
for the server group node specific
stuff (that's how I've set it up in the past)
Or you could use the email replace filter as previously suggested.
-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Nau, Michael
Sent: Monday
, June 25, 2012 5:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Server group alias in notification web URL
Michael,
The server sends the notification out as it 'knows itself'so if it
knows itself via name1 instead of the group alias...that is what you
will get. You should be able to configure both
Michael,
You can refe white paper on server group for more detail on what LJ is
suggeting
Page 12-13
Ravi Rai
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:06:35 -0600
From: lj.longwing@mda.mil
Subject: Re: Server group alias in notification web URL
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Michael,
The server
Hi listers,
we plan to implement ITSM 7.6.04 with 3 Midtier servers and an AR-Server
Group of 2 AR Servers.
As we do not have a hardware loadbalancer available we try to figure out
if software loadbalancing is a possibility.
Do you have experience with Microsoft NLB in an ITSM environment
.1wt.eu/
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/ktcpvs/ktcpvs.html
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/
Axton Grams
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Tobias Ziegler
tobias.zieg...@vipcon.comwrote:
**
Hi listers,
** **
we plan to implement ITSM 7.6.04 with 3 Midtier servers and an AR-Server
Hi listers,
I'm with ARS and midtier 7.5.
I have two ARS servers named:
a1.contoso.es
a2.contoso.es
balanced both under address ars.contoso.es
I have mid-tier configured only with server ars.contoso.es.
But sometimes I want to access to one specific server, for instance when
setting ARS
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:22 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Configuring Mid-tier for a server group
** Hi listers,
I'm with ARS and midtier 7.5.
I have two ARS servers named:
a1.contoso.eshttp://a1.contoso.es
a2.contoso.eshttp://a2.contoso.es
balanced both under address
1 - 100 of 367 matches
Mail list logo
