[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-11-26 Thread rajacat

tomjtx;155526 Wrote: 
  95bcwh;155500 Wrote: 
  Tomjtx,
  What kind of modded SB2 are you getting from Wayne? Does it have gold
  bybee in it?
  
  I believe it's Wayne's own SB2. I don't know if it's got bybee but I
  will check on all of that.
  I am looking forward to hearing it.
  
  Tom  
 
 Tom, do you have the modded SB3 yet? If so, do you have some initial
 impressions?
 
 Raja


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-11-26 Thread tomjtx

rajacat;157669 Wrote: 
  tomjtx;155526 Wrote: 
  
  
  Tom, do you have the modded SB3 yet? If so, do you have some initial
  impressions?
  
  Raja  
 
 Raj,
 Give me a bit more time, I don't want to post so quickly. 1st
 impressions are good
 however.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-11-17 Thread chinablues

I realise that this is the 'audiophiles' private forum inhabited by
dealers, modders, latest gizmo geeks and assorted folks with hearing
obviously as sharp as their acerbic wit.  Seriously though, a lot of
very very fine comments, (or was it hair splitting?)but of devices
clearly at the 'top end' of the 'transport/DAC' food chain.  For some
folks, knowing that you're somewhere 'up there' on this food chain is
sufficient.

Going back to a posting by High Dudgeon:

The Transporter is certainly a luxury item in a few ways. Instead of
several boxes, you have one box. Instead of a voided warranty, you have
a valid warranty. Aesthetically, it is very nice, and that is worth
quite a bit to some people. My wife thought that the SB3 and Lavry
looked geeky and out of place in our living room. She was right. She
thinks the Transporter looks elegant and cool (her words). She is
right.

I have to agree.  So too would my wife.  I still remain kinda 'geeky'
when it comes to putting together computers, but a long time back I
stopped using the soldering iron on the Hi Fi stuff.  (although I have
to admit to a little quickening of the heart when I check out the 'back
of panel' wiring.  Included in the will will have to be the wiring
instructions).

I got the TP about 2 weeks ago. Hand carried by my wife from the US to
China. An act of faith I suppose, since it's not so easy to return from
here. But so far, I've been just delighted.  Elegant and cool.
Absolutely. Wife appeal counts too you know. Sounds great, AND it plays
the Beeb here in Beijing.

Thanks for the fascinating posts!

Dan


-- 
chinablues

chinablues's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7955
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-11-17 Thread 95bcwh

Tomjtx,
What kind of modded SB2 are you getting from Wayne? Does it have gold
bybee in it?

As Greg mentioned, it's all about system synergy, price has nothing
to do with musicality, even though I owned close to $18k worth of
gears, on certain recordings, I find much more enjoyment when played
through a bose.


Rgds
barry


tomjtx;155388 Wrote: 
 Glad this thread is revived. 
 I will be getting a Bolder modded SB2 with Ultimate PS early next week
 to compare to the TP. 
 My recording engineer ( RE) friend will come over to listen as well as
 a high end dealer friend (HED) (audio, not drugs)
 Both have great ears and good taste(can't beat that).
 
 I'll post my impressions. The RE wants to ABX. OK, I'll let him do a
 little of that, but it's SO boring. The HED will only come if I buy
 really good wine( donations accepted:-)
 I'll post those results as well as my daily listening impressions.
 But give me a week.


-- 
95bcwh

95bcwh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4358
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-11-17 Thread tomjtx

95bcwh;155500 Wrote: 
 Tomjtx,
 What kind of modded SB2 are you getting from Wayne? Does it have gold
 bybee in it?
 
 I believe it's Wayne's own SB2. I don't know if it's got bybee but I
 will check on all of that.
 I am looking forward to hearing it.
 
 Tom


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-11-16 Thread jbm0

highdudgeon;150502 Wrote: 
 Seriously, I just gotta know -- where in the English-speaking world did
 you come up with that term?  Or is it a nasty, pejorative coinage of
 your own?
 

I just caught up with this thread and saw the remarkable query above
(referring to rajacat's use of the hard-to-escape word 'fanboy').

Is this some sort of deadpan humor too sophisticated for me to get?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanboy

 ... The earliest published uses of the word fanboy have been dated to
 1982...


-- 
jbm0

jbm0's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3949
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-11-16 Thread tomjtx

Glad this thread is revived. 
I will be getting a Bolder modded SB2 with Ultimate PS early next week
to compare to the TP. 
My recording engineer ( RE) friend will come over to listen as well as
a high end dealer friend (HED) (audio, not drugs)
Both have great ears and good taste(can't beat that).

I'll post my impressions. The RE wants to ABX. OK, I'll let him do a
little of that, but it's SO boring. The HED will only come if I buy
really good wine( donations accepted:-)
I'll post those results as well as my daily listening impressions.
But give me a week.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-29 Thread Greg Erskine

tomjtx;150596 Wrote: 
 Greg, did you try plugging the SB wall wart into a power conditioner?
 This made a significant difference in SQ. Next get a Bolder modded
 Elpac. There are only a few elpacs left and Bolder is raising it's mod
 price from 85.00 to 100.00 on Nov.1.
 You can order the mod before you buy the elpac. When you buy the elpac
 have them ship it directly to Bolder to save shipping costs.

Thanks for the suggestions. No, I haven't tried anything with the SB3
yet. Being a bit of a DIYer, I am planning to build my own PSU, just in
the research and planning stage at the moment. I have been followng the
Bolder/RWA/Sqeezebox PSU threads on all the forums I can find.

A power conditioner is probably worth looking at for my hifi in
general, not just for the SB3.

regards


-- 
Greg Erskine

Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-29 Thread Patrick Dixon

tomjtx;150583 Wrote: 
 
 If Wayne will  offer me a 30 day trial of his modded SB and Ultimate PS
 I will jump on the offer. I would also like a trial of his modded TP. I
 promise I will buy what sounds best to me. You can run my credit card
 and charge what I don't return.
 FYI, we're happy to do that with the SB+.


-- 
Patrick Dixon

www.at-tunes.co.uk

Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-29 Thread tomjtx

Patrick Dixon;150610 Wrote: 
 FYI, we're happy to do that with the SB+.

Wouldn't there be  high shipping and duty from UK to US?

Hmmm, I have 2 friends coming for a concert here, a British duo,
perhaps they coud bring it. I will PM you if it could work


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread Greg Erskine

Hi Coffee,

I think you need to factor in a PSU upgrade into your SB3+DAC
equation.

Also, the superior remote, second display screen and greater input and
output options give the Transporter greater flexibility.

BTW: Has anyone tried SB3 digital out into Transporter DAC?

regards


-- 
Greg Erskine

Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread PhilNYC

Greg Erskine;150375 Wrote: 
 
 BTW: Has anyone tried SB3 digital out into Transporter DAC?
 
 regards


That seems kind of incestuous, no?  lol!


-- 
PhilNYC

Sonic Spirits Inc.
http://www.sonicspirits.com

PhilNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=837
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

Greg Erskine;150375 Wrote: 
 Hi Coffee,
 
 I think you need to factor in a PSU upgrade into your SB3+DAC
 equation.
 
 

good point. The modde elpac will be about 150.00 after wayn's nov.
price increase.

SB/DAC/Epac  1450.00


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread sleepysurf

Highdudgeon... in fairness to everybody here, you should provide a
disclaimer that you are an authorized Transporter reseller.


-- 
sleepysurf

squeezebox2 (with elpac linear psu)  benchmark dac1  modwright swl 9.0
pre  sunfire cinema grand  ml summits.  blue jeans cables.

sleepysurf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

I don't think you quite got what I said: 1 Transporter - $1,700 with the
offer; one SB3+DAC AND one SB3 are $1,600, so the difference is $100. 
Chuck in the rounded out price of the Transporter and, yes, you're at
$400.

Frankly, if you have the budget, it's a no-brainer.  Don't stress out
trying difference components, etc., or you'll drive yourself crazy and
spend a lot more money.  The Transporter has an excellent rep, it looks
cool, and it is a good value.

Coffee;150367 Wrote: 
 Thanks for the in-depth reply, HighDudgeon, especially your comparison
 tests. I will certainly do some research on the Lavry and Benchmark.
 
 The cost figures are not quite right, though. For $2000 and the special
 offer, I can get a Transporter and an SB3. So I get 2 systems, one
 excellent and one decent. Or I can get an SB3+DAC combo costing $1300,
 plus another SB3 costing $300. Again 2 systems. The total for that is
 $1600, as you said. But the difference is $400, not $100. Of course, if
 I dither some more the Transporter special will be over and I'll be
 looking at a $700 difference!


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

Yes, I am, but I am also an honest Audiophile.  So is PhilNYC.  I can
also sell Lavry products.  You'll notice that I am somewhat blatantly
saying that I prefer the TP to the Lavry.  Don't bother with my posts,
then, as I said -- read others.  The TP is extremely well received.

The other poster has a point: with a SB3/DAC combo, you're also into it
for a nicer PSU and a cable.

But, it all depends on what you can afford, right?  If you can afford a
Transporter, then great; if not, you can get awfully close with an SB3
and a Lavry or Benchmark.  I am not a Benchmark dealer.  I would not,
however, begin to compare something from Musical Fidelity to the
Benchmark or Lavry, both of which are at the cutting edge.

sleepysurf;150410 Wrote: 
 Highdudgeon... in fairness to everybody here, you should provide a
 disclaimer that you are an authorized Transporter reseller.


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

highdudgeon;150430 Wrote: 
 Yes, I am, but I am also an honest Audiophile.  So is PhilNYC.  I can
 also sell Lavry products.  You'll notice that I am somewhat blatantly
 saying that I prefer the TP to the Lavry.  Don't bother with my posts,
 then, as I said -- read others.  The TP is extremely well received.
 
 The other poster has a point: with a SB3/DAC combo, you're also into it
 for a nicer PSU and a cable.
 
 

Agree again. I think you will be very pleased with a TP purchase. It is
a  noticable improvement over the SB+Lavry. Also you get an SB for a
second system.
To get this with the SB Lavry you would have to buy a second SB:

TP with SB= 2,000.00

2 SB's 600.00
Lavry  975.00
Modded elpac 145.00 (you will sacrifice a lot in sound quality w/o
this)
cheap digital cable 35.00

total   1755.00 and still it's not as good as a TP

so it's only 245.00 more for the transporter.

For me, that's a no brainer


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

AND the TP is sexy!  Actually, it really is.  No lies.  My wife, for the
first time since the day she freaked out over my pair of McIntosh
MC-501s (they're beautiful!  They cost how much?!!!), looked at the
Transporter in action and said that it was really elegant.  It is.  She
thinks the SB3 and Lavry (which are sitting next to it) looks like an
audio geek set up.  Which, of course, it is. ; )

tomjtx;150432 Wrote: 
 Agree again. I think you will be very pleased with a TP purchase. It is
 a  noticable improvement over the SB+Lavry. Also you get an SB for a
 second system.
 To get this with the SB Lavry you would have to buy a second SB:
 
 TP with SB= 2,000.00
 
 2 SB's 600.00
 Lavry  975.00
 Modded elpac 145.00 (you will sacrifice a lot in sound quality w/o
 this)
 cheap digital cable 35.00
 
 total   1755.00 and still it's not as good as a TP
 
 so it's only 245.00 more for the transporter.
 
 For me, that's a no brainer


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread ezkcdude

highdudgeon;150440 Wrote: 
 AND the TP is sexy!  AShe thinks the SB3 and Lavry (which are sitting
 next to it) looks like an audio geek set up.  Which, of course, it is.
 ; )

The Transporter transforms you from geek to geek chic.


-- 
ezkcdude

DIY projects page:
http://www.ezdiyaudio.com

System:
SB3-EZDAC-MIT Terminator 2 interconnects-Endler Audio 24-step
Attenuators (RCA-direct)-Parasound Halo A23 125W/ch amplifier-Speltz
anti-cables-DIY 2-ways + Dayton Titanic 10 subwoofer

He's not hi-fi, he's my stereo.

ezkcdude's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2545
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

highdudgeon;150440 Wrote: 
 AND the TP is sexy!  Actually, it really is.  No lies.  My wife, for the
 first time since the day she freaked out over my pair of McIntosh
 MC-501s (they're beautiful!  They cost how much?!!!), looked at the
 Transporter in action and said that it was really elegant.  It is.  She
 thinks the SB3 and Lavry (which are sitting next to it) looks like an
 audio geek set up.  Which, of course, it is. ; )

Jeff Rowland just got a Transporter after hearing one in his home
system.
He likes the visual design too. Pretty good recommendation, I'd say.

The TP look fits very well with my Rowland.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

Jeff Rowland knows a thing or two about audio, too.

For giggles, I just ran Phil's request experiment -- informally and
with children in the house.  Basically, I listened to the Transporter,
and then switched to Transporter into Lavry (nice that they are on the
same shelf).  The not surprising conclusion: the TP into the Lavry
sounds, well, like the Lavry.  The TP sounds like the TP and it has an
edge in imaging and precision.  

To be honest, I expected it to be the other way around.  And, by way of
further disclaimer, I would be happy with the TP even if the Lavry were
a smidge better.  Why? Because I value the one-box solution and remote
control.  The fact that I like the TP better is icing on the cake of a
decision I had already made.

tomjtx;150458 Wrote: 
 Jeff Rowland just got a Transporter after hearing one in his home
 system.
 He likes the visual design too. Pretty good recommendation, I'd say.
 
 The TP look fits very well with my Rowland.


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

highdudgeon;150462 Wrote: 
 Jeff Rowland knows a thing or two about audio, too.
 
 For giggles, I just ran Phil's request experiment -- informally and
 with children in the house.  Basically, I listened to the Transporter,
 and then switched to Transporter into Lavry (nice that they are on the
 same shelf).  The not surprising conclusion: the TP into the Lavry
 sounds, well, like the Lavry.  The TP sounds like the TP and it has an
 edge in imaging and precision.  
 
 My results exactly. You can't go wrong with a TP purchase.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

highdudgeon;150430 Wrote: 
 Yes, I am, but I am also an honest Audiophile.  So is PhilNYC.  I can
 also sell Lavry products.  You'll notice that I am somewhat blatantly
 saying that I prefer the TP to the Lavry.  Don't bother with my posts,
 then, as I said -- read others.  The TP is extremely well received.
 
 The other poster has a point: with a SB3/DAC combo, you're also into it
 for a nicer PSU and a cable.
 
 But, it all depends on what you can afford, right?  If you can afford a
 Transporter, then great; if not, you can get awfully close with an SB3
 and a Lavry or Benchmark.  I am not a Benchmark dealer.  I would not,
 however, begin to compare something from Musical Fidelity to the
 Benchmark or Lavry, both of which are at the cutting edge.


Well, I always thought that you were a Squeezebox fanboy so now I see
that you have had hidden motives. You really need to include a
disclosure statement in all your posts. No wonder you constantly diss
the modding community. You must be a Lavry dealer too!  Sorta like
insider posting on stock forums without disclosing your financial
interests.


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

rajacat;150469 Wrote: 
 Well, I always thought that you were a Squeezebox fanboy so now I see
 that you have had hidden motives. You really need to include a
 disclosure statement in all your posts. No wonder you constantly diss
 the modding community. You must be a Lavry dealer too!  Sorta like
 insider posting on stock forums without disclosing your financial
 interests.

I'm sorry, I don't follow your logic. Why would a SD dealer have a
motive to diss the modding comunity. The modders help sell the SB and
the TP.
eg.' I can buy an Sb and mod it cheaply to be as good as a 5,000 CDP'
Pretty good PR for the SB , IMHO.
or  I can make the TP even better with the mods! Again, another
selling point for the TP.
So a SD dealer actually has a financial incentive to suport the moding
community not the opposite.

HD's skepticism about mods actually speaks to his honesty, not the
reverse.

I have gotten to know HD in private posts and find him to be a
straightforward and honest person. I don't always agree with his
opinions ,but I do respect them


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

Oh yeh,
I forgot to say I am not a dealer. I do sell some hi-end classical
guitars but they are not made by SD :-)


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

If Mr. highdungeon is so honest why doesn't he disclose his connection
to Slim Devices?


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

You will notice that I did disclose my connection.  For the record, too,
I have been a dealer for less than two weeks.  My comments about mods,
etc., were from well before I even thought about becoming a dealer.

But that's beside the point.  You've enjoyed trolling me, and others,
on several threads, so this is expected.

And, again, don't take my word for it -- read Ben Diss's report.  Ben
is not a dealer.

Finally, fanboy is, well, a bit of a silly, grade school insult.  It
speaks to your own immaturity.  I recommend refraining from flaming
people like this.

rajacat;150475 Wrote: 
 If Mr. highdungeon is so honest why doesn't he disclose his connection
 to Slim Devices?


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

Also, I believe in some mods, I have a modded Bolder Elpac and I was
considering modding my SB as well before I bought the TP.
I considered the SB mod because I was so impressed by the modded
Elpac.
I respect what wayne does but I am not convinced by everything he does(
I don't hear what the Bybee is supposed to do)
I am closely watching Wayne's (Bolder) mods of his TP and would love to
hear one once he figures it all out. OTH , I am so impressed by the TP
that I wonder if I would ever think I needed to mod it. I would
definitely have to do an AB to decide.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

What is he thinking of doing with the SB?

I, too, don't have anything intrinsically against modding.  I've owned
plenty of modded stuff, including a wonderful CDP from Modwright (local
guy, at that).  That's not the issue.  The issue for me has always been
that some people can be a bit gullible and spend lots of money without
really understanding what is going on.  The nicer PSU is a good idea. 
The $700 version is, well, for someone who has $700 burning a hole in
their pocket.  Everything within reason, eh?

As for the Transporter, I was so impressed by the SB3 from the
beginning, and then further impressed by the SB3 with some cutting edge
DACs, that I decided to pursue a relationship with the company.  I
believe in the smart, open-source develop SD uses and the fine products
they produce.  If these things were not facts, Logitech would not have
spent a considerable amount of money in buying a small company.

Again, don't take my word for it -- listen to what others, like Ben and
Tom, have to say about the Transporter.  I think it is a great sounding
and cool looking product.  However, if a person is not a fanboy
(whatever that is...I'm assuming a poor translation of some kind, as it
is not something I have ever heard in English), than why even haunt this
forum?  But that's another question.  Do whatever you like; be happy;
relax, it's about the music.


tomjtx;150480 Wrote: 
 Also, I believe in some mods, I have a modded Bolder Elpac and I was
 considering modding my SB as well before I bought the TP.
 I considered the SB mod because I was so impressed by the modded
 Elpac.
 I respect what wayne does but I am not convinced by everything he does(
 I don't hear what the Bybee is supposed to do)
 I am closely watching Wayne's (Bolder) mods of his TP and would love to
 hear one once he figures it all out. OTH , I am so impressed by the TP
 that I wonder if I would ever think I needed to mod it. I would
 definitely have to do an AB to decide.


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

highdudgeon;150485 Wrote: 
 What is he thinking of doing with the SB?
 
 I, too, don't have anything intrinsically against modding.  I've owned
 plenty of modded stuff, including a wonderful CDP from Modwright (local
 guy, at that).  That's not the issue.  The issue for me has always been
 that some people can be a bit gullible and spend lots of money without
 really understanding what is going on.  The nicer PSU is a good idea. 
 The $700 version is, well, for someone who has $700 burning a hole in
 their pocket.  Everything within reason, eh?
 
 As for the Transporter, I was so impressed by the SB3 from the
 beginning, and then further impressed by the SB3 with some cutting edge
 DACs, that I decided to pursue a relationship with the company.  I
 believe in the smart, open-source develop SD uses and the fine products
 they produce.  If these things were not facts, Logitech would not have
 spent a considerable amount of money in buying a small company.
 
 Again, don't take my word for it -- listen to what others, like Ben and
 Tom, have to say about the Transporter.  I think it is a great sounding
 and cool looking product.  However, if a person is not a fanboy
 (whatever that is...I'm assuming a poor translation of some kind, as it
 is not something I have ever heard in English), than why even haunt this
 forum?  But that's another question.  Do whatever you like; be happy;
 relax, it's about the music.

well said.

Rajacat seems to have some kind of issue with anyone who disagrees with
him.
What's wrong with being a fanboy?  I assume this a fan of SD
products, well, I am a fan because they make a great product.

Rajacat, do you own a SB? If you do, doesn't this make you a fanboy?

If you don't why are you here?


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

highdudgeon;150485 Wrote: 
 What is he thinking of doing with the SB?
 
 I, too, don't have anything intrinsically against modding.  I've owned
 plenty of modded stuff, including a wonderful CDP from Modwright (local
 guy, at that).  That's not the issue.  The issue for me has always been
 that some people can be a bit gullible and spend lots of money without
 really understanding what is going on.  The nicer PSU is a good idea. 
 The $700 version is, well, for someone who has $700 burning a hole in
 their pocket.  Everything within reason, eh?
 
 As for the Transporter, I was so impressed by the SB3 from the
 beginning, and then further impressed by the SB3 with some cutting edge
 DACs, that I decided to pursue a relationship with the company.  I
 believe in the smart, open-source develop SD uses and the fine products
 they produce.  If these things were not facts, Logitech would not have
 spent a considerable amount of money in buying a small company.
 
 Again, don't take my word for it -- listen to what others, like Ben and
 Tom, have to say about the Transporter.  I think it is a great sounding
 and cool looking product.  However, if a person is not a fanboy
 (whatever that is...I'm assuming a poor translation of some kind, as it
 is not something I have ever heard in English), than why even haunt this
 forum?  But that's another question.  Do whatever you like; be happy;
 relax, it's about the music.

If you check out various forums in the audiophile community, especially
ones dealing with a particular manufacturer, there usually is a small
group of regular posters that will brook no criticism of their precious
speaker, amp. or whatever. Sometimes it makes you doubt their
objectivity or perhaps they are just in a state of infatuation. Thus
such terms as fanboy or groupie seem warranted. It is just a
shorthanded way of describing this phenomena.

Raja


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

I have owned a SB3 for at least 6 months and have recently signed up for
Bolder's digital mod. I think that the stock SB is a great product but
with some room for improvement thus my interest in modifications.

Raja


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

So, you're a Squeeze Box and Bolder fanboy.  Neat.

Seriously, I just gotta know -- where in the English-speaking world did
you come up with that term?  Or is it a nasty, pejorative coinage of
your own?


rajacat;150492 Wrote: 
 I have owned a SB3 for at least 6 months and have recently signed up for
 Bolder's digital mod. I think that the stock SB is a great product but
 with some room for improvement thus my interest in modifications.
 
 Raja


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

highdudgeon;150502 Wrote: 
 So, you're a Squeeze Box and Bolder fanboy.  Neat.
 
 Seriously, I just gotta know -- where in the English-speaking world did
 you come up with that term?  Or is it a nasty, pejorative coinage of
 your own?
 
 I'm quite fine with criticisms.  I've had criticisms galore, mostly
 having to do with software, and I perfectly well realize that the SB3
 is not the best thing on the planet.  My two CDPs sound better. 
 Easily.  They also cost quite a bit more.  The SB3 has, of course, all
 the virtues of size and flexibility.  Many, or most, reasonable people
 would agree that the single best improvemet to the SB3 is an excellent
 DAC.  That's the course I took and I was (and am) very happy.  Do you
 really think spending almost $1,000 on a DAC isn't a mod to the
 system driven by a desire for higher performance?!  I think Wayne is a
 nice guy.  He is not, however, Lavry Engineering, Benchmark or Slim
 Devices.  If that were the case, mastering studios would be gushing
 about various mods.  They aren't. 
 
 The Transporter is on another level.  I have a gripe or two (I wish the
 letters, and not just the numbers, were backlit on the remote), but it
 is, overall, a very high performance device.  Slim Devices hit a home
 run.  They are easily on the level of Benchmark, Lavry, and Mytek, and
 that is a high level indeed.

My NOS DAC only cost $250 and the consensus seems to be that it
competes well with DAC's and state-of-the-art CDP's that cost multiples
more.
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0406/mhdt_laboratory_dac.htm

I think that, for the most part, that you can, with intelligent
choices, at least equal the SQ of the stock Transporter with a modded
SB (either analog or digital) and a linear powersupply. If you choose
the digital mod the choice of a good DAC is critical. The Transporter
is a nice luxury but if you already own a SB, there are other more cost
effective routes to sonic bliss.

Raja


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

Rajacat,

I do agree with you -- one can approach, and perhaps equal, the
Transporter by going the path of a Squeeze Box and ancillary devices. 
I've heard way too many DACs in the last few months, but I can tell you
this: you would be hard pressed to equal a Benchmark and especially a
Lavry.  And, assuming you had the engineering background of a Dan
Lavry, you'd still be into it for the time involved.  Time, of course,
is money.

The Transporter is certainly a luxury item in a few ways.  Instead of
several boxes, you have one box.  Instead of a voided warranty, you
have a valid warranty.  Aesthetically, it is very nice, and this is
worth quite a bit to some people.  My wife thought that the SB3 and
Lavry looked geeky and out of place in our living room. She was right. 
She thinks the Transporter looks elegant and cool (her words).  She is
right.

So, I think we are perhaps in agreement -- there are a number of ways
to skin a cat.  Much depends on one's aesthetics, abilities (not
everyone is up to the soldering iron and 'scope challenge), needs, and
budgets.

rajacat;150521 Wrote: 
 My NOS DAC only cost $250 and the consensus seems to be that it competes
 well with DAC's and state-of-the-art CDP's that cost multiples more.
 http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0406/mhdt_laboratory_dac.htm
 
 I think that, for the most part, that you can, with intelligent
 choices, at least equal the SQ of the stock Transporter with a modded
 SB (either analog or digital) and a linear powersupply. If you choose
 the digital mod the choice of a good DAC is critical. The Transporter
 is a nice luxury but if you already own a SB, there are other more cost
 effective routes to sonic bliss.
 
 With the increased popularity of MHDT DAC's you might have to pay more
 than $250, perhaps $350 or so.
 
 Raja


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

rajacat;150521 Wrote: 
 My NOS DAC only cost $250 and the consensus seems to be that it competes
 well with DAC's and state-of-the-art CDP's that cost multiples more.
 http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0406/mhdt_laboratory_dac.htm
 
 I think that, for the most part, that you can, with intelligent
 choices, at least equal the SQ of the stock Transporter with a modded
 SB (either analog or digital) and a linear powersupply. If you choose
 the digital mod the choice of a good DAC is critical. The Transporter
 is a nice luxury but if you already own a SB, there are other more cost
 effective routes to sonic bliss.
 Raja

rajacat, I don't disagree. My SB/modded elpac sounds great with both my
DACS,
I had the luxury of hearing a TP before buying. I liked it so much I
had to buy it and it keeps getting better with burn in. It is one of
the most musically involving components I have heard in a long time.

For me it is better than the SB+DAC and that's why I bought it. I have
2 people waiting to buy my SB/mod elpac at break even so I'm not out
anything.

I also like that the TP matches well visually with my Rowland
gear.but if it didn't sound beter I wouldn't have bought it.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

Exactly.  Really, it does sound better than an SB3 and a Lavry DAC. 
And, I do have an Elpac.

tomjtx;150537 Wrote: 
 rajacat, I don't disagree. My SB/modded elpac sounds great with both my
 DACS,
 I had the luxury of hearing a TP before buying. I liked it so much I
 had to buy it and it keeps getting better with burn in. It is one of
 the most musically involving components I have heard in a long time.
 
 For me it is better than the SB+DAC and that's why I bought it. I have
 2 people waiting to buy my SB/mod elpac at break even so I'm not out
 anything.
 
 I also like that the TP matches well visually with my Rowland
 gear.but if it didn't sound beter I wouldn't have bought it.


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

Perhaps one should check out some of the other forums such as The Audio
Circle for opinions on the SB/Transporter topic. Exposure to a wider
range of opinions is often enlightening. Of course the stock
Transporter should be better than the stock SB.  Awhile ago some on
this forum were stating the opinion that the stock SB power supply was
all you needed and Slim Devices had the so-called scientific data to
back it up. So if the stock switching supply was great why did they
upgrade it in the Transporter. Did the scientific data change?

Raja


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

rajacat;150550 Wrote: 
 Perhaps one should check out some of the other forums such as The Audio
 Circle for opinions on the SB/Transporter topic. Exposure to a wider
 range of opinions is often enlightening. Of course the stock
 Transporter should be better than the stock SB.  Awhile ago some on
 this forum were stating the opinion that the stock SB power supply was
 all you needed and Slim Devices had the so-called scientific data to
 back it up. So if the stock switching supply was great why did they
 upgrade it in the Transporter. Did the scientific data change?
 
 Raja

Yeh, i read audio circle all the time. The posts you are talking about
are on the Bolder manufacturers site. Most of the posts saying the
Bolder modded SB is better than the TP are by Wayne himself. the other
is by a Wayne devotee who heard the 2 at the RMAF for a few hours.
Hardly unbiased opinions formed from weeks of listening experience.
I like Wayne, he seems like a sincere guy, but some of his recent posts
re the TP
seem a bit self serving , to say the least.  think it is far to earl to
be talking about modding the TP. Let it break in and do some serious
listenig before making judgements. Having said that. if I heard a
Bolder modded TP and thought it was better I would do it. But it is WAY
too soon to be on that bandwagon.
Get real RAj, you have just discredited yourself with this post. Why
didn't you just come out and say the posts were on the Bolder site?

Can you not afford a TP? Is that why you are so invested in a modded
SB?


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

tomjtx;150551 Wrote: 
 Yeh, i read audio circle all the time. The posts you are talking about
 are on the Bolder manufacturers site. Most of the posts saying the
 Bolder modded SB is better than the TP are by Wayne himself. the other
 is by a Wayne devotee who heard the 2 at the RMAF for a few hours.
 Hardly unbiased opinions formed from weeks of listening experience.
 I like Wayne, he seems like a sincere guy, but some of his recent posts
 re the TP
 seem a bit self serving , to say the least.  think it is far to earl to
 be talking about modding the TP. Let it break in and do some serious
 listening before making judgments. Having said that. if I heard a
 Bolder modded TP and thought it was better I would do it. But it is WAY
 too soon to be on that bandwagon.
 Get real RAj, you have just discredited yourself with this post. Why
 didn't you just come out and say the posts were on the Bolder site?
 
 Can you not afford a TP? Is that why you are so invested in a modded
 SB?

You didn't answer my question about the power supply. I agree that it
is too early to judge definitively if a modded SB is better than a
stock TP. Isn't this the Slim Devices forum? Can't we expect that there
are SD pumpers on this sight. I agree that it is in Wayne's interest to
pump his services but in the past he has offered and held shootouts
between various versions of his mods vs. all comers. I held out for a
long time before signing up for a Bolder mod. Didn't his modded SB get
one of the Enjoy the Music's annual awards? Naturally, you could say
that that is bogus and ETM is not legit but if they gave the award to
the TP than I imagine you would be very
happy.http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/1006/bestof2006.htm


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

Actually, I think ETM is a pretty funny site.  Their takes on cables are
a gas, to say nothing of endorsements of all manner of silly items. 
This is good for a few chuckles:

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0906/cable_shootout_pt2.htm

rajacat;150555 Wrote: 
 You didn't answer my question about the power supply. I agree that it is
 too early to judge definitively if a modded SB is better than a stock
 TP. Isn't this the Slim Devices forum? Can't we expect that there are
 SD pumpers on this sight. I agree that it is in Wayne's interest to
 pump his services but in the past he has offered and held shootouts
 between various versions of his mods vs. all comers. I held out for a
 long time before signing up for a Bolder mod. Didn't his modded SB get
 one of the Enjoy the Music's annual awards? Naturally, you could say
 that that is bogus and ETM is not legit but if they gave the award to
 the TP than I imagine you would be very
 happy.http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/1006/bestof2006.htm


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

highdudgeon;150560 Wrote: 
 Actually, I think ETM is a pretty funny site.  Their takes on cables are
 a gas, to say nothing of endorsements of all manner of silly items. 
 This is good for a few chuckles:
 
 http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0906/cable_shootout_pt2.htm

Okay, if it is so funny, what makes you such a great authority? At
least they listen and compare what they criticize. I'm sure if they
praised your precious Lavry you would then think that they are legit.
Most of what you talk about is just opinion based on very little
experience. Hot air and pumping your items that you deal.  What about
the power supply issue. Why did SD change its design for the TS if it
wasn't deficient on some way? They published the scope photos, so now
those photos don't count. Very inconsistent, I must say!

Raja


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread Coffee

The cost of the TP is not a real problem. I just want to make a decision
that I won't regret later. I'm not a true audiophile (my ears just
aren't that good) and I tend to keep my stuff for a long time. I'm
still using my Denon CD player from over 10 years ago. It cost over
$1000 at that time. So $1700 with today's dollar is a bargain if the TP
indeed is as good as many (practically all) of you say. It is true that
perhaps the remote volume control alone is worth the extra $400
(surprising that no other DAC in this price range has this simple
feature).

I was, and still am, a little skeptical about the audiophile quality of
a Slim Devices product. The SB is a proven and revolutionary device but
that only proves that SD is a great high tech company. It seems
unlikely, although definitely not impossible, that SD can create a DAC
that is superior to companies that have been doing this kind of stuff
for decades. But from the testimonials posted so far, apparently SD has
indeed succeeded in doing so.

So I guess I'll bite the bullet and contribute my $2000 to celebrate
SD's success!


-- 
Coffee

Coffee's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8198
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

Well, look at it this way -- it comes with a 30 day guarantee, right? 
How could you go wrong?

Coffee;150564 Wrote: 
 The cost of the TP is not a real problem. I just want to make a decision
 that I won't regret later. I'm not a true audiophile (my ears just
 aren't that good) and I tend to keep my stuff for a long time. I'm
 still using my Denon CD player from over 10 years ago. It cost over
 $1000 at that time. So $1700 with today's dollar is a bargain if the TP
 indeed is as good as many (practically all) of you say. It is true that
 perhaps the remote volume control alone is worth the extra $400
 (surprising that no other DAC in this price range has this simple
 feature).
 
 I was, and still am, a little skeptical about the audiophile quality of
 a Slim Devices product. The SB is a proven and revolutionary device but
 that only proves that SD is a great high tech company. It seems
 unlikely, although definitely not impossible, that SD can create a DAC
 that is superior to companies that have been doing this kind of stuff
 for decades. But from the testimonials posted so far, apparently SD has
 indeed succeeded in doing so.
 
 So I guess I'll bite the bullet and contribute my $2000 to celebrate
 SD's success!


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread highdudgeon

Oh, please, would you just relax?  I'm not saying they're not legitimate
-- Bob Neill, with whom I sometimes disagree, has written some great
reviews.  I think some of their reviewing techniques can be a bit
silly, though (the score cards) and, like any rag, there's a lot of
fluff.

I am not pumping anything.  I don't need to.  In fact, you are not even
in my marketplace.

Lavry?  Good point.  Currently, it is pretty much the most highly
regarded DAC amongst mastering studio types.   Very little experience? 
Okay, I guess that 25 years of pretty serious audiophile time doesn't
count for much -- but, how would you know?  I mean, Raja, listen to
yourself -- you're going around and making assumptions, as facts, about
people you have never met.

The PSU for the Squeeze Box isn't really defective.  Defective, Raja,
means that it does not work.  It works and, for $300, the SB is an
incredible package.  Of COURSE it can be improved upon.  Sean Adams is
the first to admit that one of the things he worked hard on was a
significantly upgraded power section for the Transporter.  According to
these ears, and many others, he succeeded.

Look, would you please read my posts?  I agree with you that there is a
legitimate area for mods.  I commended you -- I was positive toward you,
in a way you seem to be incapable of being toward people whom you have
decided not to like -- for your skills.  But, the fact remains that
mods are a small, teeny-tiny sliver of the market.  Tiny.  People spend
tens of thousands of dollars on audio and don't mod one single item. 
I've never heard of people going at McIntoshes, ARCs, or what have you
with a soldering iron -- or at least not in any numbers that count. 
The same goes for slim products.  The majority of users don't get into
this. They are happy with what they have.  If you're into it, then more
power to you.  But, please, quit being so defensive and insulting.  It's
annoying and you're managing to wreck, once again, a perfectly
interesting thread.

I hope you find some peace.

rajacat;150562 Wrote: 
 Okay, if it is so funny, what makes you such a great authority? At least
 they listen and compare what they criticize. I'm sure if they praised
 your precious Lavry you would then think that they are legit. Most of
 what you talk about is just opinion based on very little experience.
 Hot air and pumping your items that you deal.  What about the power
 supply issue. Why did SD change its design for the TS if it wasn't
 deficient on some way? They published the scope photos, so now those
 photos don't count. Very inconsistent, I must say!
 
 Raja


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread 95bcwh

Mr. Coffee,
My advice is, get the transporter, listen to it, if you like it, then
keep it, if you don't like it, return it. There's no need to seek
endorsement in forum. What people said in the forum does not
represent what your ears will hear. If the transporter sounds crap to
you, does it matter if 99% of the other users say it's good, or vice
versa?





Coffee;150564 Wrote: 
 The cost of the TP is not a real problem. I just want to make a decision
 that I won't regret later. I'm not a true audiophile (my ears just
 aren't that good) and I tend to keep my stuff for a long time. I'm
 still using my Denon CD player from over 10 years ago. It cost over
 $1000 at that time. So $1700 with today's dollar is a bargain if the TP
 indeed is as good as many (practically all) of you say. It is true that
 perhaps the remote volume control alone is worth the extra $400
 (surprising that no other DAC in this price range has this simple
 feature).
 
 I was, and still am, a little skeptical about the audiophile quality of
 a Slim Devices product. The SB is a proven and revolutionary device but
 that only proves that SD is a great high tech company. It seems
 unlikely, although definitely not impossible, that SD can create a DAC
 that is superior to companies that have been doing this kind of stuff
 for decades. But from the testimonials posted so far, apparently SD has
 indeed succeeded in doing so.
 
 So I guess I'll bite the bullet and contribute my $2000 to celebrate
 SD's success!


-- 
95bcwh

95bcwh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4358
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

rajacat;150555 Wrote: 
 You didn't answer my question about the power supply. I agree that it is
 too early to judge definitively if a modded SB is better than a stock
 TP. Isn't this the Slim Devices forum? Can't we expect that there are
 SD pumpers on this sight. I agree that it is in Wayne's interest to
 pump his services but in the past he has offered and held shootouts
 between various versions of his mods vs. all comers. I held out for a
 long time before signing up for a Bolder mod. Didn't his modded SB get
 one of the Enjoy the Music's annual awards? Naturally, you could say
 that that is bogus and ETM is not legit but if they gave the award to
 the TP than I imagine you would be very
 happy.http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/1006/bestof2006.htm


READ MY  POSTS. I never said the stock SB power supply was adequate. I
bought a Bolder Elpac and it is much better. The TP has 3 advanced PS's
and is probably one of the reasons it sounds so good. 
I didn't answer your question because it was irrelevent to our
discussion.

My ears tell me the the TP is far superior to the SB with Bolder elpac
(as good as that is) Why does that offend you so?

My reading of Wayne's posts indicate he thinks the TP sounds better
than all his SB iterations EXCEPT with the Ultimate PS with his power
cords and connectors and Bybees. That costs around 2,300.00 to
2,400.00. However, it is obvious he hasn't done a serious review. BY
HIS OWN ADMSSION HE HASN'T EVEN LISTENED TO THE TP ON THE SAME SYSTEM
AS HIS MODDED SB! He has hardly listened to the TP because he was busy
getting ready for RMAF. He also runs his SB on earlier firmware which
he claims sounds better. A true AB would have to be done on the same
firmware if one believes his contention that 6.5 sounds inferior to
earlier firmwares. So Waynes opinions are ful of logical
inconsistencies. One has to git rid of all variables in order to do a
fair comparison.
Wayne says that the modded SB with his earlier PS (better than his
modded elpac DOESN't sound as good as a stock TP.

So your own guru disagrees with you you. Are you not folowing your own
recommendations and keeping up with the the Audio circle posts?  Or are
you purposely obfuscating?
And, no, I wouldn't be ecstatic if ETM gave a rave to the TP. I
couldn't care less. It 
doesn't matter to me what other people think, I only have to please my
ears, not other's.

I have no emotional investment in the TP or the SB. If I found
something that sounded better I would buy it and sell the TP in a NY
minute.

I didn't even know about SD  until 2 months ago.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread 95bcwh

tomjtx;150576 Wrote: 
 BY HIS OWN ADMSSION HE HASN'T EVEN LISTENED TO THE TP ON THE SAME SYSTEM
 AS HIS MODDED SB! He has hardly listened to the TP because he was busy
 getting ready for RMAF. He also runs his SB on earlier firmware which
 he claims sounds better. A true AB would have to be done on the same
 firmware if one believes his contention that 6.5 sounds inferior to
 earlier firmwares

Your statement might be correct, up to the 20th of October. At the
RMAF, the transporter and Bolder's SB2 were put on exactly the same
system. 

Your second point does not sound right to me either, the right
comparison should be, pick the firmware that sound best for Bolder SB2,
and then pick the firmware that sound best for the Transporter, and
compare the two. You want to compare two optimized setups. I didn't
ask Wayne which firmware he used when he switch to the Transporter, but
I know for sure he's using version 15 when he played his modified SB2.


-- 
95bcwh

95bcwh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4358
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

95bcwh;150572 Wrote: 
 So you're talking about me, branded me as a Bolder Devotee, just
 because I heard both and said that Wayne's fully modified SB2 analog
 out with his Ultimate PS is better than the Transporter analog out?
 
 So you said because I haven't listened to it for more than 2 hrs, then
 my observation is biased?
 
 You can choose to believe that the transporter is the best in the
 world, fine with me, and good for you, as long as you're happy. I have
 no interest in convincing people by talking or writing in the forum, my
 principle is, you have to listen to it yourself, if you haven't, you can
 write anything on any forum but it's pure speculation.
 
 The RMAF is opened to everyone, if Waynes doesn't feel that his stuff
 is better than the Transporter, do you think he will be stupid enough
 to let everyone doing the A/B and only ended up embarrassing himself?
 
 If you haven't been to the RMAF, then you're being arrogant to
 discredit my ears. The difference that I heard at the RMAF, between the
 Bolder's SB2 and the Transporter, is not subtle, I don't need 2 hrs to
 tell which is better in his setup. I repeat, in HIS SETUP!!
 
 I have been holding out from making any purchase from Bolder, because I
 have high hope on the Transporter, unfortunately I left the RMAF feeling
 rather disappointed that the Transporter didn't sound as good as
 Bolder's SB2. Maybe the Bolder's SB2 is only better that particular
 setup? Maybe the Transporter may sound better in another setup with
 different speakers, different amps? These are the questions that I
 cannot answer. In fact, I am going to order a Transporter, taking
 advantage of its 30-day money back guarantee so I can do an A/B in my
 system. I have never believed in absolute superiority, it's all about
 system synergy.

I agree and I apologize if my post offended you. I am not sure if I was
refering to your post. I was trying to comment on making conclusive
judgements based on brief observation. I don't think your post was
doing that. I think RAj was trying to do that and was using your post
incorrectly.
The TP changes quite a bit in the 1st weeks. It becomes more refined
and musical . Perhaps wayne's TP was not well broken in,or perhaps it
was and his mods are better. I have an open mind on that. My main point
is that it should and does take a lot of time to sort through these
issues. Even the Absolute Sound and Stereophile reviewers live with a
piece of gear for months before writing a review.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

Total investment in my SB3 will be less than $500 after the Bolder mods.
My DAC cost me $250. If I can come extremely close to the TS in terms of
SQ I will be satisfied. There is always something better and I do not
want to spend the $'s for the absolute best. Now the way you talk you
must have an unlimited budget so more power to you. Part of the art of
being an audiophile is learning how to intelligently allocate your
funds to obtain the best sound you can within certain parameters. I
figure that I would be better off taking that extra $1250 and investing
it in acoustical treatments or a better amp so that the end result would
be better SQ than if I bought the high-priced spread i.e. The
Transporter.


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread 95bcwh

Yes, there're too many variables why certain thing sound better than the
other thing. Even though the Bolder SB2 sounded better than the
Transporter at the RMAF, at the end of the day, all I can say is, it
sounded better than the Transporter at the RMAF.

On the audiocircle, Wayne is well-known, some times we wrote things
without writing the whole sentence and we're forgiven for that. I have
to make sure that I write full sentence in the other forums, so that it
didn't cause any confusion.

Peace, and enjoy your music. 

tomjtx;150579 Wrote: 
 I agree and I apologize if my post offended you. I am not sure if I was
 refering to your post. I was trying to comment on making conclusive
 judgements based on brief observation. I don't think your post was
 doing that. I think RAj was trying to do that and was using your post
 incorrectly.
 The TP changes quite a bit in the 1st weeks. It becomes more refined
 and musical . Perhaps wayne's TP was not well broken in,or perhaps it
 was and his mods are better. I have an open mind on that. My main point
 is that it should and does take a lot of time to sort through these
 issues. Even the Absolute Sound and Stereophile reviewers live with a
 piece of gear for months before writing a review.


-- 
95bcwh

95bcwh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4358
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

one other thing:
You say the modded SB sounded better than the TP on wayne's system.
Isn't it in Wayne's best interest to make his SB sound better than the
TP? He has a financial interest in this after all.
It was his room, couldn't he engineer it to make his mods sound better.
I am not questioning his integrity, but he could have an unconcious bias
toward his own product.

i am a skeptomaniac when it it comes to audio, remember buyer beware

That's why I think it's good you will give the TP a 30 day trial. I
wouldn't have tried mine otherwise.

If Wayne will  offer me a 30 day trial of his modded SB and Ultimate PS
I will jump on the offer. I would also like a trial of his modded TP. I
promise I will buy what sounds best to me. You can run my credit card
and charge what I don't return.

How about it Wayne, will you do that?

I truly have no vested interest in the TP, I'll dump it yesterday if I
find something better near it's pric (and, yes Wayne's 2400.00 setup is
close enough)

So sell me Wayne, I am eager to be convinced!


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

tomjtx;150583 Wrote: 
 one other thing:
 You say the modded SB sounded better than the TP on wayne's system.
 Isn't it in Wayne's best interest to make his SB sound better than the
 TP? He has a financial interest in this after all.
 It was his room, couldn't he engineer it to make his mods sound better.
 I am not questioning his integrity, but he could have an unconcious bias
 toward his own product.
 
 i am a skeptomaniac when it it comes to audio, remember buyer beware
 
 That's why I think it's good you will give the TP a 30 day trial. I
 wouldn't have tried mine otherwise.
 
 If Wayne will  offer me a 30 day trial of his modded SB and Ultimate PS
 I will jump on the offer. I would also like a trial of his modded TP. I
 promise I will buy what sounds best to me. You can run my credit card
 and charge what I don't return.
 
 How about it Wayne, will you do that?
 
 I truly have no vested interest in the TP, I'll dump it yesterday if I
 find something better near it's pric (and, yes Wayne's 2400.00 setup is
 close enough)
 
 So sell me Wayne, I am eager to be convinced!

Why don't you email him with your offer?


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

rajacat;150580 Wrote: 
 Total investment in my SB3 will be less than $500 after the Bolder mods.
 My DAC cost me $250. If I can come extremely close to the TS in terms of
 SQ I will be satisfied. There is always something better and I do not
 want to spend the $'s for the absolute best. Now the way you talk you
 must have an unlimited budget so more power to you. Part of the art of
 being an audiophile is learning how to intelligently allocate your
 funds to obtain the best sound you can within certain parameters. I
 figure that I would be better off taking that extra $1250 and investing
 it in acoustical treatments or a better amp so that the end result would
 be better SQ than if I bought the high-priced spread i.e. The
 Transporter.
 
 Disclosure:
 Wayne is not my guru.
 I too am skeptical of his ebony hockey pucks.
 I did try the silver/ceramic fuse in my PS and it made a noticable
 positive impact on SQ.

OK, I am in complete agreement with this post. I am sure your combo
will sound great. I just sold some guitars so I could indulge and go
for the TP. I wish I did have an unlimited budget ( and so does my
dealer friend:-) ) It was no risk for me with the 30 day trial. Once I
sell my other 2 dacs and my SB/elpac(I have several buyers in line) I
will break even or maybe come out ahead(1st time for that!)

So peace, Bro


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread rajacat

tomjtx;150585 Wrote: 
 OK, I am in complete agreement with this post. I am sure your combo will
 sound great. I just sold some guitars so I could indulge and go for the
 TP. I wish I did have an unlimited budget ( and so does my dealer
 friend:-) ) It was no risk for me with the 30 day trial. Once I sell my
 other 2 dacs and my SB/elpac(I have several buyers in line) I will break
 even or maybe come out ahead(1st time for that!)
 
 So peace, Bro

I didn't know about the 30 day offer so maybe I'll demo the TS too
although I'd have to sell my pre, SB, dac and extra amp  to stay within
my budget. I could use the analog outs and connect directly to my
restored Scott LK-48 which will be returned from the amp guru in about
3 weeks.
~~
Sounds good but I think I will give the digital mod a try since it is
the easiest path for now because I already have a good DAC. The digital
mods are only $175. Actually my system is sounding pretty good right
now.

Peace to you too!

Best regards 

Raja


-- 
rajacat

rajacat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4156
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

rajacat;150588 Wrote: 
 I didn't know about the 30 day offer so maybe I'll demo the TS too
 although I'd have to sell my pre, SB, dac and extra amp  to stay within
 my budget. I could use the analog outs and connect directly to my
 restored Scott LK-48 which will be returned from the amp guru in about
 3 weeks.
 ~~
 Sounds good but I think I will give the digital mod a try since it is
 the easiest path for now because I already have a good DAC. The digital
 mods are only $175. Actually my system is sounding pretty good right
 now.
 
 Peace to you too!
 
 Best regards 
 
 Raja
That's what I was going to do(digital mods) as well. Then I heard the
TP  courtesy of my dealer friend and I got hooked. I had just sold a
guitar and hadn't made a major purchase in quite some time so I went
for it. I worked my way up to my Watt/Puppy/ Rowland system
incrementally.
My preference is to live with the TP for awhile. It is very satisfying
musically, I am enjoying my system more than ever.
But I would be very interested to hear Wayne's full SB system, if I
like it more I would buy it. If I had an unlimited budget I would buy
it just to try it.But I don't, So I hope he is willing to do a trial. I
wouldn't ask him if I weren't serious.

I have the impression Wayne is a sincere, honest guy.I think he
believes in what he does. I was VERY impressed by his elpac mod. 

I don't bybee into, oops, buy into all of his mods :-)
I am not saying those mods are objectively inaudiblr, just that I don't
hear it.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread Greg Erskine

Congratulations everyone for not allowing this thread to degenerate into
a  fight. A little compromise, an occasional apology makes it better
for all - we can now enjoy this hobby that we obviously feel strongly
about.

We are all intelligent enough to listen to ALL opinions, comparisons
and recommendations and take what information is useable for our
personal situation.

I bought a Transporter/SB3 as a leap of faith after reading about the
Squeezebox at AudioCircle and good words from fellow AKSA amp owners.
Well, the SB3 arrived and I was shocked, this thing didn't sound as
good as my old Yamaha CD player or Pioneer DVD player but I still loved
it, it is so so convenient. But after a weekwell nothing
happenedit didn't get any better. I was expecting far more, even
from a standard SB3.

Well a few more weeks passed and the Transporter arrived. I plugged it
in and my faith was restoredI sounds very good IMHO. As mentioned
elsewhere, I also believe the Transporter made a significant
improvement after a week (or there abouts) burn-in. I don't really
believe in burn-in theory as I haven't experienced it with other
equipment. It's probably just a physiological effect of spending the
money, and being very happy with the results.

I am very interested in modding the SB3 to get it up to the level of my
Transporter. This is the only way to really find out the facts.

As a side note: I stuck my SB3 in my test system consisting of a $150
amp and pretty ordinary floorstanding speakers and had to listen twice,
the SB3 sounded better to me in this setup than my real system. Was it
95bcwh that mentioned system synergy? No wonder we get into arguments
about X being better than Y, way to many variables.

Happy listening
Greg


-- 
Greg Erskine

Greg Erskine's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7403
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-28 Thread tomjtx

Greg Erskine;150593 Wrote: 
 . Well, the SB3 arrived and I was shocked, this thing didn't sound as
 good as my old Yamaha CD player or Pioneer DVD player but I still loved
 it, it is so so convenient. But after a weekwell nothing
 happenedit didn't get any better. I was expecting far more, even
 from a standard SB3.
 
 
 I am very interested in modding the SB3 to get it up to the level of my
 Transporter. This is the only way to really find out the facts.
 Happy listening
 Greg

Greg, did you try plugging the SB wall wart into a power conditioner?
This made a significant difference in SQ. Next get a Bolder modded
Elpac. There are only a few elpacs left and Bolder is raising it's mod
price from 85.00 to 100.00 on Nov.1.
You can order the mod before you buy the elpac. When you buy the elpac
have them ship it directly to Bolder to save shipping costs.

I am a skeptic and cheapskate but this mod is well worth the cost. Live
with it for a few weeks and then you can decide if you want to mod the
SB as well. Since I have a TP I won't go further than the Elpac. If I
keep my SB it will be for my kid.

Glad to hear you perceive a difference with TP burn in I am hearing
significant improvement especially in the top end. I don't think it's
in your head, I go back to my old DACS as a reality check to compare
the TP with.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-27 Thread highdudgeon

Hi,

Yes, your logic is somewhat flawed.  What won't change dramatically is
precisely the digital side.  Transports, including the SB3, will
virtually all sound the same through the right kind of DAC (ie,
something like the Lavry DA10 or another device that buffers and
re-clocks the signal).  So, you wouldn't need junk the SB3.  It is an
excellent transport with very low jitter at the s/pdif output.  What
you might want to change is what comes after the digital transmission.

DACs do differ considerably and some handle jitter better than others. 
Some have better output stages, volume controls, etc., than others.  The
Lavry DA10 is an exceptional DAC.  It is designed with the needs of
mastering studios, not audiophiles, in mind...and, frankly, that is a
higher standard.  It, and the Benchmark, is a better value than a
Musical Fidelity or other DACs costing much more (see Ben Diss's
comments).  So, with a SB3 and a Lavry ($975) you're in for $1,300. 
That is, in fact, cheaper than a Transporter.  I know, because I have a
SB3 and a Lavry.  Thing is, I also have a Transporter.

Here's what you get with the SB3+ RIGHT DAC setup: flexibility to
upgrade the DAC down the line, in case that is really necessary (it
really won't be); if one component goes south, you can swap  it out
while it it gets fixed. 

Now, with a Transporter purchase, you get the Transporter AND a second
SB3.  Now, your SB3 + Lavry/Benchmark is costing $1,600.  Almost the
SAME cost as the transporter.  So, for $100, what do you get?

1.  You get everything in one very attractive box.  I didn't think the
knob would be functional.  It is really functional and fun to use.  The
overall design is tasteful.  The side-by-side screens are very cool and
also very useful.  You don't have two devices on top of each other. 
You get a remote for the sound.  You get something that looks nice and
not industrial.

2.  You get fabulous value in terms of sound.  In the two weeks I've
had the Transporter, I've done the following test with friends:
Transporter, SB3, SB3+Lavry, Sony XA-9000, EC EMC1 CDP (c'mon, someone
get that).  Everyone agreed that that two CDP's sounded better than the
SB3 alone.  No surprise there.  However, everyone agreed that the SB3
and Lavry sounded better than the CDPs.  Again, no surprise.  Also, the
consensus was that the Transporter was superior, or at the very least
the equal off, the CDPs.  I wasn't shocked, given what we know about
the device.  Acid test: SB3 +  Lavry against the Transport.  It took me
a while to tease this one out.  Mind you, I am biased: I've been using
the Lavry since it came out and I know the sound.  After a while,
though, I found the Transporter to deliver a bit better imaging and 3-D
layering than the Lavry.  To check this out, I drove the Transporter
through the Lavry.  Same result.  In the end, I found, as did four
friends, that the Transport was simply more satisfying.  Perhaps by a
bit, perhaps as a matter of nuance, and perhaps subjectively, yes, but
more satisfying.  And, in one attractive box.

I'm keeping the SB3 and Lavry because I will use them in my second
system.   Having said that, I think the Transporter is an absolutely
terrific device.  If you get it with a SB3 thrown in...it's a great
deal.  Again, read Ben Diss's comments.

Good luck!




Coffee;150354 Wrote: 
 I'm a new member and I'm trying to decide whether to buy an SB3 and a
 DAC or a Transporter. Even with the free SB3 special, the Transporter
 still costs $1700. I can buy a PS Audio or Musical Fidelity DAC for
 about $1000. So the SB3+DAC combo is still $400 cheaper. The
 Transporter is no doubt a high quality piece of equipment, but so is
 Musical Fidelity stuff. In any case, the digital side is high-tech and
 will change rapidly, whereas the analog side hasn't and probably will
 not change significantly for a long time to come. With a separate DAC,
 I can junk the SB3 when something better comes up (like better wireless
 networking). Seems to make perfect sense to me.
 
 I have searched this forum and cannot find this question raised
 previously. Is my logic flawed in some way?


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.

highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-27 Thread tomjtx

I agree with HighDudgeon (with a name like that you better agree or
else)

I've had my Transporter for a week now and I like it better than the
Lavry+SB or Lavry+TP.

When comparing costs remember to factor in the cost of a cable between
the SB and DAC. This can be as little as 35.00 for a glass fiber optic
or a BlueJeans coax forabout the same. Or you can go all audiophile and
spend 300.00 to 1,000.00
(valhalla)

Also, the TP looks SO cool, isn't THAT worth the extra money? :-)

Seriously, to my ears, the TP sounds better and is more pleasing
musically.


-- 
tomjtx

tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: SB3+DAC vs Transporter

2006-10-27 Thread Coffee

Thanks for the in-depth reply, HighDudgeon, especially your comparison
tests. I will certainly do some research on the Lavry and Benchmark.

The cost figures are not quite right, though. For $2000 and the special
offer, I can get a Transporter and an SB3. So I get 2 systems, one
excellent and one decent. Or I can get an SB3+DAC combo costing $1300,
plus another SB3 costing $300. Again 2 systems. The total for that is
$1600, as you said. But the difference is $400, not $100. Of course, if
I dither some more the Transporter special will be over and I'll be
looking at a $700 difference!


-- 
Coffee

Coffee's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8198
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles