I'll just run this by everyone again
"If you wish to talk about personal images use the example of adults,
a spouse for example. Or personal information. Involving children is
like using the word Nazi, it is designed to close down debate, because
of the moral panic surrounding the issue."
Yep, ab
>> I suspect you can trust your family, friends etc to respect your wishes, and
>> you can limit the distribution through trust.
>> Images of children can be sourced for advertising without having to resort
>> to using private images.
So your basic answer is that in a world without copyright,
owledge or consent on an advert. I genuinely don't understand why
you think forcibly taking that freedom away from me in a complete
abolition of copyright enhances society.
Martin Belam,
Information Architect, guardian.co.uk - currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.
co.uk/604644/telegraph-swaps-microsoft-office-for-google-apps
>
> Cheers,
>
> jod
>
> From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk on behalf of Martin Belam
> Sent: Sun 26/04/2009 00:28
> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [backstage] [Fwd: [
01
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Martin Belam
> Sent: 25 April 2009 23:18
> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
> Subject: Re: [backstage] [Fwd: [ORG-discuss] The Guardian drops Offi
easy to share documents inside and outside of the
corporate firewall.
Mail serverwise on WIndows - Notes/Domino. Don't know what the set-up
is on a Mac, but if you search for Jemima's tweets on the subject,
you'll know it isn't popular ;-)
all the best,
Martin Bel
v - independent digital television and switchover
> advice, since 2002
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
beit one without a print edition.
>>
>> Robert (Jamie) Munro
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Brian Butterworth
>
> follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/briantist
> web: http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover
> advice, since 2002
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
he demo on the 6 o'clock news today, and I did wonder about the legal
> implications.
> rgds
> Sam Mbale
> Mpelembe Network
> http://www.mpelembe.net
>
> Follow me on http://twitter.com/mpelembe
>
>
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the bac
Looks great but shame launching yesterday seemed to break the main site ;-)
More seriously, I think it is a really interesting application of the
'river of news' UI.
My tuppence would be:
* Make the category name in the right-hand site a link through to the
index page for that category.
* I'm s
> Is this the worst bit of maths on BBC News so far this year?
Figures actually come from Google no?
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/powering-google-search.html
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/ma
Since the BBC is more generally accused of being pro-Chavez because it
enjoys his anti-US position, maybe this is just a bit of balance?
More seriously, it does raise wider issues about how Internet access
and language skew online representation. The BBC is always very clear
that "polls" online ar
Bowyer
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-
I don't think it is "evil", and as I've pointed out on their blog and
on Sphinn, since Patrick at Blogstorm himself applies "nofollow" to
all outbound links it is a little rich to be complaining that the BBC
doesn't provide 'trusted' links. Interesting point about how Google
can be expected to run
rnet Censorship! http://www.eff.org
>> ~
>> Open-Source Community, and Technology Testbed: http://www.house404.co.uk/
>> -
>> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
>> visit ht
ml.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
>
> Just a quick idea. How about a page on bbc.co.uk noting sections that have
> closed?
I think that is called the 'Press Release' after the
govmt/DCMS/Ofcom/BBC Trust/Uncle Tom Cobbly review of the BBC website
that seems to have to be carried out out every 18 months...
-
Sent via the backstage.bb
One thing I find naive interesting here is (and I could be
wrong because I haven't waded through all of the reports) is that they
don't seem to have a benchmark of what other similar sites might
expect their figures to be for internal search use versus external
search use. Nor do they seem to have
>
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
There is a piece on this in The Guardian today - he makes some
interesting points but at one stage he suggests that Facebook is a
closed system, and that nobody can move onto a new social platform
because all of their friends are there, so Facebook will rule forever.
I would have thought that expla
I've got a hunch the answer is going to involve the word "Majordomo"...
martin
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.b
> (From http://www.zedshaw.com/rants/rails_is_a_ghetto.html which I
> found hilarious and may be of interest to Ruby on Rail developers :-)
I *loved* that, but I wasn't convinced I'd ever hire him and expect
him to respect an NDA after the event - which maybe doesn't show he is
a good a business a
I think 10% or 20% time is a great thing to allow not just developers,
but many areas of the BBC, and I wished it had happened whilst I was
there. Just a shame that if people get to know more widely about it
you can be sure that the press will be asking that everyone gets a 10%
or 20% rebate on the
I used to face this kind of question when doing the analysis of search
logs at the BBC to produce the "popular searches right now" list.
Obviously I used to filter out obscenities, but, for example,
something like 'big brother' or the 'x-factor' would generate a lot of
searches on bbc.co.uk, but w
> An excellent quote which I will endeavour to use in 2008 every time
> the zealots start drowning out the conversation.
though I suspect you will be met with similar content to almost the
first reaction to that article:
"It's sad to see that Linus Torvalds, one of the leading figures in
the Free
> The difference is that the BBC could drop the probability to zero by
> not requiring the use of proprietary software...
Or by closing the list if it was deemed to be an unhelpful echo
chamber that wasn't beneficial to the BBC for the amount of money
spent on the backstage.bbc.co.uk project
m
-
> I would start by constructing Acts of Parliament by Wiki for a start.
If that isn't a job creation scheme for lawyers I don't what is...
"May it please the court to get back to the matter in hand, is a
blaspheme against the Flying Spaghetti Monster still a crime if it is
was spoken in LOLCAT by
> With internet speeds increasing these online systems are very useful for
> the average user who sends emails, writes letters, etc, as they take away
> the burden of looking after software and keeping it up to date.
Or another way of looking it, if you keep building systems with the
expectation
> So what you are really saying is that as long as it is not generally
known that saving streams is easy to do, then this is fig leaf to
placate the rights holders.
To be less glib than I have been on here recently, erm, pretty much
that is it. *I* know you can rip streams to files to keep for e
> This is a particular feature of Internet Explorer 7, I find.
Google Reader does the same as well
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.h
That is kind of the figures I was expecting. Just to be clear here,
the way I see it is that if the BBC stands up and says we believe in
"libre" not "gratis", so we don't want anything to do with software
or codecs that involve patents, pretty much at least 80%+ of the
people who own portable musi
are on
them?
On 20/11/2007, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/11/2007, Martin Belam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You see, I just somehow knew that giving away content including music
> > for free, forever, at the point of delivery, to anyone, regardle
p. To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. T
val from a manager
>
> probably not all that efficient when all you want to do is send an email out
> and go home (or to the pub!)
>
> - james
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> James Cox,
> Internet Consultant
> t: 07968 349990 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://i
ing_list.html
> . Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Please email me back if you need any more help.
> >
> > Brian Butterworth
> > www.ukfree.tv
>
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
se
> visit
> http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Please email me back if you need any more help.
>
> Brian Butterworth
> www.ukfree.tv
>> I was in a class of four people in the sixth form that did a
Statistics A-Level
There's a statistics joke in there somewhere but it is too early for me.
Just to be clear here, the BBC has strong editorial guidelines that
online votes are to be effectively taken with a pinch of salt, and not
heir day in the
sun. But while markets and manipulators invest in research, surveys,
psychology, profiles and debriefings from the rising cacophony, it is a
curiosity that, quite possibly, the more we listen to what some people
say, the less we know about what - or even if - most people think.
Hi all, I have my BBC hat back on at the moment, and one of the things I
am working on is a project to do with online voting and ratings.
Part of my brief is to explore how the BBC might utilise and re-use
information and data gathered via voting, and hopefully make a business
case for releasing i
Perhaps that is where all my bandwidth went...
m
On 02/09/07, Richard Smedley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 00:50 +0300, Martin Belam wrote:
> > Yeah, mostly Pipes to process the RSS feeds, and the Google Custom
> > Search Engine. There's also
gt; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Belam
> Sent: 30 August 2007 22:12
> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
> Subject: [backstage] Introducing Chipwrapper search for UK newspapers
>
> Hi all, I wanted to introduce to the list
stamps, so won't work
> with twitterfeed which needs the time stamps to know if an item is new
> and/or has been posted previously.
>
> Any chance you could add this?
>
> Cheers,
> Mario.
>
>
> On 8/30/07, Martin Belam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> &
ng to build it up by hand?
I'm going to be in London for most of September and October with my
BBC hat back on for a bit, so hopefully I might see/meet some of you
at something suitably geeky during the course of that.
all the best,
martin
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sen
MAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Bowden
> Sent: 22 August 2007 09:13
> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
> Subject: RE: [backstage] A bit late
>
>
>
> IIRC a kids version of iPlayer is on the roadmap - with various content
> controls to preve
t hold of it
m
On 20/08/07, oliver wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > And what of the Numbers Stations?
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_stations
>
>
> Is it just me who finds those amazingly creapy? I ran across them l
#x27;t owned by Bill Gates' company...
>
>
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> > -
> > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
> visit
> http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
&
ut 100%.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > R.
> > >
> > > On 8/15/07, Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> More likely, "Organisers put the turnout at 800..."
> > >>
> > >> R.
> &
-off.html
>
> Dan Lyons is a well known Microsoft shill.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dave
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> htt
strictions in the iPlayer will make a difference.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dave
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-arc
Indeed most large sites of the scale of the BBC
> have had bespoke solutions over the years.
>
> In the meantime the forum industry has continued to improve their
> offering. Next time there's a requirement for a software refresh of the
> forum software, then it might just be tha
> Again, who (that is assuming sanity) buys the ridiculously overpriced
> monstrosity that is Sky+ ?
As is often the case on this list we seem to be leaps and bounds ahead
of the general learning curve of the general public. Sky+ might not
make sense to the sane people here, but they have shifted
ttp://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
> > Computers are like air conditioners. Both stop working, if
> > you open windows.
> > -- Adam Heath
> > -
> > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To
> > unsubscribe, please visit
> > http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing
w.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
> >
>
>
> --
> Gary Kirk
> -
> Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
> visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
____
> Simon Cobb
> Technical Project Manager, BBC Vision (F&L)
> BBC Future Media & Technology
> 2507, White City, London W12 7TS
> T: 020 875 27968
>
>
>
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
commercial negotiations.
The whole point of the BBC is that it's not a commercial entity (at least
domestically). Besides, if I don't ask, I won't get; if I do ask, the worst
they can do is refuse me.
Vijay.
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstag
ackstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/
mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-
archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unof
/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Both stop working, if you open windows.
-- Adam Heath
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co
ssion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, p
gt; http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.0.0/754 - Release
> > > Date: 09/04/2007
port Firefox is?" every five minutes during meetings here.
cheers,
martin
On 28/03/07, Kim Plowright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you read Martin Belam (hello Martin!) on the methods he used to derive these
figures, you'll note that he's extremely thorough in his dat
archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.htm
/www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
ttp://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
> Unofficial list archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
>
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/200
On a related DRM tip, I just thought I'd chip in with some comments my
wife made last night. We download podcasts from the BBC, and from
Virgin Radio (thanks Mr Cridland!), but obviously it is all talk
related, not full track music content.
My wife asked me "Are there any podcasts from XFM or som
ars being
a recent example.
--
From the North, this is Kirk
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-
es/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.ht
discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion
dition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.39/685 - Release Date: 13/02/2007
22:01
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/b
not *exactly*... the 'it was too popular for its own good' refers to
various local radio stations having their bandwidth soaked up due to
people downloading stuff... not good for business, that...
It didn't do much for productivity either as I recall - I think at the
point my team blagged two or
Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but will do. Does that mean
we don't have to carry on the debate here anymore ;-)
cheers,
martin
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
On 13/02/07, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I'd just like to say t
"The Trust has also asked the executive to adopt a platform-agnostic approach
to the iPlayer. The original proposal for the service would have meant it
was only available to Microsoft users but the Trust's proposal will require
them to develop an alternative framework which will allow users of oth
net
activities - it gives the BBC a huge advantage over other net companies who
don't get public money to support their online ventures.
Festive wishes
Josh
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Belam
Sent: Wednesday, December
BC content suppliers rich and make people pay
twice for their BBC content?
I even wonder what the BBC is for in this digital era... ... ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Belam
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:41 AM
To: backstag
What you're talking about is a global, industry issue with thousands of
diverse stakeholders - from actors to cameramen.
And you also have to realise that the rights are not just for the UK,
there are different rights frameworks across the globe. So, for
example, if the BBC started chucking out
I know that Martin Belam has done a little work
on this ( http://www.currybet.net/articles/user_agents/index.php )
but these results are now a year out of date.
Yes, my new report about visitors to Sony's CONNECT store doesn't make
such interesting reading - 100% IE & Windo
I don't know why it seems to be Flash in particular that brings this
out in folk.
I can tell you that it is no different on the continent either - I
spent a very entertaining meeting here in Austria the other week
facing exactly the same "The horror! The horror!" reaction to the
notion of using
Ian, why don't you apply for the job of Chairman of the BBC?
I think the Chairman is more of a strategic hands-off job, and I'm
sure Ian would miss getting his hands dirty with widget code :-)
On 29/11/06, Nic James Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Ian Forrester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wri
As far as I am aware, every song on TOTP up until 1983 was
re-recorded so that the BBC owned the rights of broadcast in the
charter it clearly states that the BBC must distribute its content to
the UK public. so where is all that music that "I payed for" :-)
A lot of it got discarded, e
What happens when setting up a proxy service is as easy as running
an application and using one is as easy as typing in a url?
It means I finally get to listen to the Ashes here in Austria :-)
On 27/11/06, Ian Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So it looks like some kind of GPL tunnell
One of the things I tried to do that I was suprised didn't work [and
is an issue for backstage I suspect] is the normal BBC 2 tv
schedule. It only has links for one week. I didn't try url hacking
maybe that would have worked I don't know. I was just suprised that
the standard listing showed only
Now a useful feature would be the ability to drag someone's incorrectly placed photo across the map to the right spot.That way I could stop greyhounds winning races a good bus ride away from Walthamstow's dog stadium -
http://www.flickr.com/photos/emsef/227626652/ - and somebody Sapnish could sort
IL PROTECTED]] On> Behalf Of Phil> > Winstanley> > Sent: 25 October 2006 09:03
> > To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk> > Subject: RE: [backstage] Newssniffer - BBC News site> > monitoring> >
> >> >> >
As someone who used to work closely with the BBC community site teams my first thought was what happens when the BBC pulls posts for legal reasons, and this site reproduces them - who ends up potentially legally liable - the site re-hosting the content, the BBC, or the original poster, even though
>> Is there any chance this could have 5 days like the url suggests?>>
Are there any plans to include the full 5-day forecasts in the feed?I'm pretty sure the key phrase in Kathryn's opening email was "(Met Office willing)"
:-(martinOn 18/10/06, Michael Pritchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also th
> I suspect at many points in the show, he's has on two different
tracks, plus his own drum machine.
Well, that at least goes some way to explaining why I find it an
intolerable racket ;-)
More seriously on this point, I think on this list there are a
collection of people who are likely to
Fair play, the delay is annoying, as is building up a false expectation - but
I'll wager my tuppence that Ben and Jem are more fed up with the wrangling
causing the delay than anyone outside the BBC :-(
m
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dogsbody
Sent: Tue 15/11/
Firstly I'd echo Tom's sentiment:
>> Strange behaviours surface when you see bbc.co.uk at the end of your email
>> address; fear of bringing opprobrium to the BBC due to saying the wrong
>> thing in public can cause otherwise eloquent BBC employees to clam up.
I'm normally happy to shout to the
In the wierd way that the BBC works I am responsible for both the homepage
Breaking News and the system that delivers the breaking News email. The
breaking news email and desktop alert gozmo are both much more fequent events
than switching the homepage into 'breaking news' mode
The BBC sends ou
005 4:12 PM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Test
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:51:03 +0100
"Martin Belam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know there have been some issues with the Majordomo servers, and
> that some work is planned on them, but I'm not a
I know there have been some issues with the Majordomo servers, and that
some work is planned on them, but I'm not aware that they have packed in
completely
Martin Belam, Senior Development Producer, BBC New Media & Technology
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mail
92 matches
Mail list logo
