I'm running the latest nightly embedded build and get a lot of the
following in my logs:
10-03-29 13:26:50.3503] Slim::Utils::Misc::msg (1164) Warning:
[13:26:50.3441] Use of uninitialized value $_ in substitution (s///) at
Jim - do you remember the bug # of that issue? I want to improve this for the
next release.
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
Mnyb;528324 Wrote:
7.5e ime is 10/1 more likely to show the start tracks in wrong player
via the web-UI bug, than any other version i tried.
Especially after a rescan ?
How to trace this, this is a classic bug reported many times over the
years, but no remedy or 100% sure way to reproduce
Thanks Andy,
works perfectly on r30411.
You've even made transcoding (e.g. JPG-PNG) work. Nice!
But as you suggested, I will avoid requesting a specific format in the
future, i.e. I will request .../cover_300x300_F instead of
.../cover_300x300_F.png.
--
flattermann
Home of
Has anyone experienced any nasty issues with the most recent builds?
Yesterday's build was not able to properly stream most of my songs, and
I upgraded to today's, and I'm getting the same issue. I'm using the
iTunes plugin on a sheevaplug FWIW. Today I tried to play a playlist
and it gave me the
hungarianhc;527984 Wrote:
Problem: Can't Open file for: [URL]
Sounds familiar http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71623
--
slate
Main: Duet - Beresford Caiman - Carver A-500x - BW 704
Office: Duet - Technics SU-V50 - Stax SR84 Pro
Server: Zotac IONITX-A, 4 GB, 1 TB WD EADS, Win7
flattermann;527595 Wrote:
FYI: I've tried 7.5-embedded on my Debian PPC today, and everything
works out-of-the-box using Sqlite...
I didn't expect that... ;-)
Well, rejoiced too soon! ;-)
I've got some problems with cover art resize @r30403.
Let's say I have a 300x300 cover art for
On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:21 AM, flattermann wrote:
Code:
[10-03-24 12:14:15.0192] Slim::Web::Graphics::artworkRequest (77) Artwork
request: music/38ad3c29/cover_300x300.png
[10-03-24 12:14:15.0208] Slim::Web::Graphics::artworkRequest (116) Resize
specification:
Thanks Andy.
Here's the bug:
https://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15944
BTW: Is .../cover_400x400.*png* expected to actually return a *PNG*
image even if the original image is a JPG, or is the returned artwork
expected to be in the same format as the original image?
Right now, if the
flattermann;527685 Wrote:
?
Right now, if the artwork is returned successfully, it's in the same
format as the original image (i.e. a resized *JPG* is returned)...
That's always been that way.
Beware of BMP!
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote, at
I somehow managed to update my 7.4.2 final build on debian squeeze on a
SheevaPlug to 7.5.0 embedded (build dating 22/3) and also managed to get
the webui running.
But the scanner seems to not find any of my files, neither mysql nor
sqlite.
--
GS_Schimpf
FYI: I've tried 7.5-embedded on my Debian PPC today, and everything
works out-of-the-box using Sqlite...
I didn't expect that... ;-)
--
flattermann
Home of 'SqueezeCommander' (http://www.squeezecommander.com) - The
SqueezeBox Remote Control App for Android
I finally got around to trying 7.5-embedded on my Sheevaplug (arm,
Ubuntu) and I think I'm seeing the same problem as pippin. The server
seems to start fine with no errors. Port 9000 seems to respond to
everything with a 404, but it does listen and respond. I haven't had
time to investigate
Still no luck with r29883 on Ubuntu.
Uninstalled the old one first. No luck
Scanner seems to work, CPU looks better than before, but no web UI.
Code:
Slim::Utils::Scanner::Local::rescan (134) Discovering files in
/mnt/slugpublic/Media
[10-01-24 03:18:18.1043]
Just tried installing r29857 on my NV+.
A full scan time for my 15K+ tracks went down from 2 hours 50 minutes
to 1 hour 5 minutes.
WOW!!!
I also have the impression the regular Squeezebox UI is a very little
bit more responsive.
Not tested it thoroughly yet, but I at least couldn't get the
bonze;505634 Wrote:
and now it's OK - with 7.5r29768 :)The radio artwork has disappeared again
from SqueezePlay Controller,
don't think it's something I did.
--
bonze
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - SqueezeCenter Version: 7.5.0 - r29857 embedded
3 x wireless SB3 + a Duet
I tried to install squeezeboxserver_7.5.0~29857_all.deb on Ubuntu 9.10
today. The package installs with no errors and the service starts.
Code:
7475 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash /usr/sbin/squeezeboxserver_safe
/usr/sbin/squeezeboxserver --prefsdir
Got r29857 working nicely whole afternoon on my ReadyNAS, so decided to
install it on my Mac tonight.
The Mac gets the music folder mounted from the ReadyNAS through AFP,
and not under /Volumes, in case this matters.
I continuously watched the ReadyNAS' SBS CPU usage and server.log file
during
Philip Meyer;505578 Wrote:
but alphabetical is ALWAYS going to be purely arbitrary, whereas the
others have a much higher chance of getting it right. (in other
words,
more likely to be desired behavior in most cases)
Disagree - there's no evidence that filesize/resolution would be a
thats just a dopey thing to say.
I don't think so, but at least I don't shout about it.
does SBS use Folder.jpg ahead of AlbumArtSmall.jpg now? b/c it didn't
used to and i haven't tried since setting Folder.jpg explicitly in the
settings.
I've never experienced small artwork being picked up
but alphabetical is ALWAYS going to be purely arbitrary, whereas the
others have a much higher chance of getting it right. (in other words,
more likely to be desired behavior in most cases)
Disagree - there's no evidence that filesize/resolution would be a higher
chance of being right. All
andyg;503953 Wrote:
Today I fixed the problems the embedded branch was having with artwork
on Windows.Seems to be working OK as expected with local music, thanks.
But there is still no 'artwork' displayed on the controller and/or
Squeezeplay when playing a radio stream.
--
bonze
mherger;505269 Wrote:
Most of your errors in server.log seem to be networking/DNS issues. Are
you using the same configuration as with your normal SBS?
Do you mean me? Yes, same config. Works fine fir the normal branch.
I believe that the issue is something around scheduling/prioritization
pippin;505295 Wrote:
NO!
A lot of sources contain correct images with arbitrary filenames. It's
been an ongoing nuisance to have to clean this up. Not having to do this
is a major usability improvement.
Especially for those 80% of the users who don't know a whole lot about
tagging.
I
maggi68;505292 Wrote:
Now I've problems with the scanner. First he search and found all files
and scan it into database and at the ent he want's to delete all files
from database. Have you tried changing the playlist setting to something else?
At the moment it looks like it is the same as the
bonze;505373 Wrote:
Have you tried changing the playlist setting to something else?
At the moment it looks like it is the same as the music setting.
good idea, I will test it.
thanks
maggi
--
maggi68
maggi68's
JJZolx;505233 Wrote:
This is why picking an arbitrary image (no matter the criteria) is going
to create support issues. You pick the first one, somebody wants you to
pick the last one. You pick the big one, somebody wants the small one.
Pick a gif, someone wants jpegs. How can anyone put
if there are multiple images, can we all not agree that in general,
meaning in the majority of cases, that using the highest resolution
image would likely be the most desired result?
No.
Quite a few of my albums have full artwork scans. eg. as well as Folder.jpg and
Cover.jpg, which are album
Philip Meyer;505354 Wrote:
I meant if there were more than one file. If there's only one, then use
it, if there's more than one, and none match the names that the scanner
would usually look for, then don't arbitrarily pick any of them.
+1.
I want to see where errors are made and don't want
but alphabetical is ALWAYS going to be purely arbitrary, whereas the
others have a much higher chance of getting it right. (in other words,
more likely to be desired behavior in most cases)
this whole thing is for unsophisticated users who are unaware. its not
for phil for example who ALREADY
I'm using the embedded branch now on Windows and so far, so good. I
think MySQL integration and switching between MySQL and SQLite are still
pretty broken, but it's working well with SQLite.
It's picking up new content and adding it to the db very quickly. I'm
impressed.
Would I be correct in
I also see that when the auto-scan picks up new content, the
Rescanning... messages are displayed in the web interface. I think
these too should be suppressed.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile:
it would be much smarter to have SBS use the biggest resolution or at
least filesize rather than the arbitrary alphabetical way. if it were
that way, i wouldn't even need to set Folder.jpg as the name to look
for.
That would mean a slower scan time, as it would need to look at the content of
Philip Meyer;504918 Wrote:
it would be much smarter to have SBS use the biggest resolution or at
least filesize rather than the arbitrary alphabetical way. if it
were
that way, i wouldn't even need to set Folder.jpg as the name to
look
for.
That would mean a slower scan time, as it would
not necessarily... looking for biggest filesize is no different than
looking for first alphabetical filename. i suspect thats also true of
resolution, as thats known to the OS as well, but i'm not positive on
that.
You are making assumptions about the OS. I don't think it can be assumed that
mherger;503899 Wrote:
Might be worth another try.
Still no luck.
I'll file a bug.
Don't get it to run on my ubuntu machine.
Runs but is incredibly slow while using almost NO CPU. Web interface
sometimes loads (soetimes not) but never works (e.g. doesn't get any
players).
I don't see a
https://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15452
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote, at penguinlovesmusic.com
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777
View this thread:
I thought it would be TinySC but it looks like it have a web interface.
If I do some testing of a svn checkout of the embedded branch, should I
run it with the web interface or should I start it with some parameter
so it doesn't include the web interface ?
Or should I just start it the same way
Philip Meyer;504964 Wrote:
not necessarily... looking for biggest filesize is no different than
looking for first alphabetical filename. i suspect thats also true
of
resolution, as thats known to the OS as well, but i'm not positive on
that.
You are making assumptions about the OS. I
Man I never would have guessed such an obvious change would result in
such an argument. File size doesn't make any more sense than
alphabetical, there is no good way to select a cover if you don't have
the correct filename. Alphabetical is as good as any other option.
--
andyg
erland;505017 Wrote:
I thought it would be TinySC but it looks like it have a web interface.
If I do some testing of a svn checkout of the embedded branch, should I
run it with the web interface or should I start it with some parameter
so it doesn't include the web interface ?
Or should I
regarding filesize, i think it can be assumed, and further it really
has nothing to do with the OS. what i am saying is that when SBS looks
for first alphabetical filename thats no different than looking for
biggest filesize. its the same additional logic already, only
filesize would be smarter
andyg Wrote:
Man I never would have guessed such an obvious change would result in
such an argument. File size doesn't make any more sense than
alphabetical, there is no good way to select a cover if you don't have
the correct filename. Alphabetical is as good as any other option.
Full
Artwork is currently not associated with an album but with a file, or
did this change with embedded?
Artwork is associated with an album (DB stores albums.artwork) - it uses this
to decide what gets show when viewing albums.
I couldn't see a similar tracks.artwork, and based on my experience of
There are a few common cases where you can see this.
1. Best of by Various Artists, which usually has some random album
cover image but each track when played will show the correct artwork on
NowPlaying
2. If you've got an album with a folder.jpg and some tracks in there
have a different cover
andyg;505069 Wrote:
Man I never would have guessed such an obvious change would result in
such an argument. File size doesn't make any more sense than
alphabetical, there is no good way to select a cover if you don't have
the correct filename. Alphabetical is as good as any other option.
Philip Meyer;505091 Wrote:
regarding filesize, i think it can be assumed, and further it really
has nothing to do with the OS. what i am saying is that when SBS
looks
for first alphabetical filename thats no different than looking for
biggest filesize. its the same additional logic
pippin;505102 Wrote:
Full ack.
Actually, file size could result in the worst of all results which is
bmp being selected...
i was under the impression that SBS only supported jpg and pngs? (and
maybe gifs?) when i had bmps mislabeled as jpgs, they didn't work. i
didn't think properly
MrSinatra;505166 Wrote:
i was under the impression that SBS only supported jpg and pngs? (and
maybe gifs?) when i had bmps mislabeled as jpgs, they didn't work. i
didn't think properly labeled bmps worked at all either. is this not
the case?
They are not supported but used, they are
interesting... i'll have to test that out. sounds like bmp is a mess
on sbs anyway, perhaps sbs should deliberately not consider bmps an
image file at all? (or at least, not by default)
more reason to hate itunes btw.
--
MrSinatra
www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2 sbc (my home) / sbr
andy, that isn't true. for example, WMP puts four files in with every
rip, two are 200x200 while the other two are 75x75
guess which two have the larger filesize?
if the 75x75 ones come first alphabetically, then they get used. (when
i first started with 6.x slimserver, this is what happened
MrSinatra;505174 Wrote:
interesting... i'll have to test that out. sounds like bmp is a mess
on sbs anyway, perhaps sbs should deliberately not consider bmps an
image file at all? (or at least, not by default)
more reason to hate itunes btw.
Full ack on not supporting .bmp
Full ack on
guess which two have the larger filesize?
With jpeg you can't count on the filesize: larger image in poor quality can be
much smaller than a really small thumbnail in highest quality.
--
Michael
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
Philip Meyer;505179 Wrote:
andy, that isn't true. for example, WMP puts four files in with every
rip, two are 200x200 while the other two are 75x75
guess which two have the larger filesize?
if the 75x75 ones come first alphabetically, then they get used.
(when
i first started with
This is why picking an arbitrary image (no matter the criteria) is going
to create support issues. You pick the first one, somebody wants you to
pick the last one. You pick the big one, somebody wants the small one.
Pick a gif, someone wants jpegs. How can anyone put _zero_ effort into
Couldn't have said it better myself JJ. :)
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
Most of your errors in server.log seem to be networking/DNS issues. Are you
using the same configuration as with your normal SBS?
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
Yes, I agree - there's no point for attempting to apply any smarter logic to
pick an arbitrary image.
Perhaps if the scanner can't see an image of a name it expects, then don't use
any image (use default artwork). At least users can see when it's wrong, and
correct their settings/tags/image
mherger;503863 Wrote:
Are the problems on ReadyNAS Duo (Squeezebox Server died) fixed or
become fixed ?
Check out tomorrow's build (r29732 or later). It still lacks a few
optimizations, but the new scanner should be working fine (and fast!)
Awesome, you did a great job. The scanner
On Jan 9, 2010, at 9:02 AM, maggi68 wrote:
mherger;503863 Wrote:
Are the problems on ReadyNAS Duo (Squeezebox Server died) fixed or
become fixed ?
Check out tomorrow's build (r29732 or later). It still lacks a few
optimizations, but the new scanner should be working fine (and fast!)
andyg;504202 Wrote:
This is actually by design, and I know it's been discussed before as a
feature request. If there is no file named cover/folder/album/thumb it
will take the first image found in the directory (alphabetical). If you
don't want this, define a cover.jpg file.
it would be
* For albums with no cover.jpg (folder.jpg, etc.) it's picking up any
old jpeg from the folder and calling that 'cover.jpg'. This can lead to
some odd looking results that aren't at all better than the 'No Artwork'
placeholder.
Is this your browser picking up some stale image from its own
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:13 PM, JJZolx wrote:
andyg;503953 Wrote:
Today I fixed the problems the embedded branch was having with artwork
on Windows.
Thanks. Mostly working very well. Some issues when cover art is
missing, as seen in the web interface.
* For albums with no cover.jpg
This is actually by design, and I know it's been discussed before as a feature
request. If there is no file named cover/folder/album/thumb it will take the
first image found in the directory (alphabetical). If you don't want this,
define a cover.jpg file.
If there's no artwork files in the
Philip Meyer;504366 Wrote:
This is actually by design, and I know it's been discussed before as a
feature request. If there is no file named cover/folder/album/thumb it
will take the first image found in the directory (alphabetical). If you
don't want this, define a cover.jpg file.
If
andyg;504202 Wrote:
* For multidisc albums like this, the cover shown in the browse
albums
page can differ from the cover shown at the track list level for the
album. For one two disc set I see the 'cover' from disc 1 at the
browse
albums level and the 'cover' from disc 2 at the album
JJZolx;504382 Wrote:
Directories are arranged:
/artist
../album
../../Disc 1
../../Disc 2
In each 'Disc' folder was a scan of the actual CD, but I'd forgotten to
place a cover.jpg in the folders.
So the only images here were a different cd.jpg in each Disc directory?
--
andyg
andyg;504384 Wrote:
So the only images here were a different cd.jpg in each Disc directory?
Yes.
[quqote]BTW, what would you expect to see in this case? Disc 1's cd.jpg
wins as the cover for the entire album?
That would work. The album artwork should be consistent. I imagine
you'd run into
Actually, I've got lots and lots of multi-disc albums, with different
coverart for each disc. I'm completely comfortable with the current
behavior: disc1's art for the album as a whole; tracks from disc1+n
having coverart from disc1+n. What's wrong with the current
arrangement?
--
gharris999
Are the problems on ReadyNAS Duo (Squeezebox Server died) fixed or
become fixed ?
--
maggi68
maggi68's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32446
View this thread:
Are the problems on ReadyNAS Duo (Squeezebox Server died) fixed or
become fixed ?
Check out tomorrow's build (r29732 or later). It still lacks a few
optimizations, but the new scanner should be working fine (and fast!)
___
beta mailing list
mherger;503863 Wrote:
but the new scanner should be working fine
Is that only ReadyNAS?
Did go back to non-embedded when I could not make the scanner work on
Ubuntu anymore a while back.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote, at penguinlovesmusic.com
but the new scanner should be working fine
Is that only ReadyNAS?
The scanner should now be working fine on all platforms.
Known issues:
- Windows: artwork sometimes isn't resized properly
- ReadyNAS: some artwork resizing optimizations missing; still using slower
stats based inline scanner
Before Christmas. Will try it tonight. Kind of liked the embedded
branch...
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote, at penguinlovesmusic.com
pippin's Profile:
Today I fixed the problems the embedded branch was having with artwork
on Windows.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread:
andyg;503953 Wrote:
Today I fixed the problems the embedded branch was having with artwork
on Windows.
Thanks. Mostly working very well. Some issues when cover art is
missing, as seen in the web interface.
* For albums with no cover.jpg (folder.jpg, etc.) it's picking up any
old jpeg from
Just wanted to let you know that the crashing Control Panel is fixed in
the latest build.
--
mherger
Michael
-
http://www.herger.net/slim-plugins - AlbumReview, Biography,
MusicInfoSCR
andyg;500159 Wrote:
On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:15 PM, JJZolx wrote:
Any chance of finding a fix for the lack of artwork in Windows? I'd
like to be able to test this branch more, but can't really use it
without artwork.
I forgot that was broken, I'll take a look at it soon.
I just ran
My experiences with the artwork problem is only for the embedded build,
it works fine for the full windows build.
The problem is there using both mySQL and SQLite.
However for me the artwork is missing for 1 in 4 and I have the red
x.
And I have also seen the problem described by JJZolx in post
Installed it on WHS this afternoon : it seems to hang on discovering
music for over 10 minutes...
If I try full rescan, it finds only 6 albums...
If needed I can post the scanner log.
Reverted to 7.5
--
Themis
SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Cyrus 8xp - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus
Hi
Im using 7.5.0-29686 on Synology DS209+ with SSODS 4.2
I tried to use existing MySQL Instance instead of SQLite.
So I changed the port from 9092 to 3306 - a database was created on
MySQL Instance and DB User has full rights.
Netherless the server log tells me he can't connect to this
Any chance of finding a fix for the lack of artwork in Windows? I'd
like to be able to test this branch more, but can't really use it
without artwork.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile:
On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:15 PM, JJZolx wrote:
Any chance of finding a fix for the lack of artwork in Windows? I'd
like to be able to test this branch more, but can't really use it
without artwork.
I forgot that was broken, I'll take a look at it soon.
on ReadyNAS Duo (sparc) there still problems.
2009-12-21 12:35:02 squeezeboxserver_safe stopped.
2009-12-21 12:35:53 squeezeboxserver_safe started.
2009-12-21 12:36:08 Squeezebox Server died. Restarting.
2009-12-21 12:36:23 Squeezebox Server died. Restarting.
Does this still become fixed ?
Are multi-disc compilations now being correctly consolidated? I just
noticed that they appear to be. I now have identical album counts in
7.5 Trunk and 7.5-embedded. The artist count is off by just two. Good
job.
--
JJZolx
Jim
Was there a problem with the 7.5.0.29580 build for WHS ??
Won't start at all, not sure if all the objects are there
--
bonze
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - SqueezeCenter Version: 7.5.0 - r29492
3 x wireless SB3 + a Duet
bonze's
bonze;494232 Wrote:
Was there a problem with the 7.5.0.29580 build for WHS ??
Won't start at all, not sure if all the objects are there
I've had a similar problem with the .deb build - won't start. haven't
had a chance to look into the problem tho'
--
Ramage
P2 266MHz, ubuntu server 9.10
Did anyone get embedded to run with Windows XP (SP3).
Even the Control Panel still doesn't start,
the scanner crashes (with MySQL),
with SQLite the scanner runs, but shows no cover artwork at all (only
red x) and doesn't seem to catch all mp3s...
Thanks for Your reply - if there is any chance
with SQLite the scanner runs, but shows no cover artwork at all (only
red x) and doesn't seem to catch all mp3s...
red X sounds strange - where do you see those? If in the browser, what's the
image's url?
As for the general state of the embedded branch on Windows: I'd consider it
Just installed Version: 7.5.0 - r29525 @ Wed Dec 2 22:42:55 PST 2009 on
Win XP Pro SP3. The scanner is fast - wow big difference.
I did notice the menu for Internet radio is not displaying correctly.
--
Lectric Larry
I don't know what's happening. It seems that the chosen database does
not affect the scanner. Although mySQL files are created, they appear to
be empty (also with MySQLTools). This is supposed to be a mySQL scan:
Code:
[09-12-03 13:13:58.5380] main::main (202)
JJZolx;490711 Wrote:
I'm unable to get MySQL to work at all. I've set MySQL as the database
in performance settings, but when the scanner is launched it still uses
SQLite. The main server appears to think MySQL is the database, as it
has no idea that a scan is running, shows no progress,
Has the build stopped working or have there been no updates to the
embedded?
--
bonze
TranquilPC T2-WHS-A3 - SqueezeCenter Version: 7.5.0 - r29492
3 x wireless SB3 + a Duet
bonze's Profile:
With the embedded branch, I'm seeing these warnings like clockwork,
about every five seconds:
Code:
[09-12-02 08:40:02.7238] Slim::Web::JSONRPC::requestMethod (383) request not
dispatchable!
[09-12-02 08:40:07.7568] Slim::Web::JSONRPC::requestMethod (383) request
Has the build stopped working or have there been no updates to the
embedded?
The build server doesn't run them automatically for some reason. Building now.
--
Michael
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
mherger;490661 Wrote:
Further info:
- I changed the music folder to D:\shares\Music and it scanned OK
- Changed back to \\Server\Music, it wiped everything then ended.
- changed to d:\shares\Music and all OK again.
Seems it has problems with the UNC naming ??
Please file a bug.
I'm unable to get MySQL to work at all. I've set MySQL as the database
in performance settings, but when the scanner is launched it still uses
SQLite. The main server appears to think MySQL is the database, as it
has no idea that a scan is running, shows no progress, and zero tracks
once the
bonze;490558 Wrote:
Further info:
- I changed the music folder to D:\shares\Music and it scanned OK
- Changed back to \\Server\Music, it wiped everything then ended.
- changed to d:\shares\Music and all OK again.
Seems it has problems with the UNC naming ??
The same here with Vista and
Ramage;490818 Wrote:
Cover art was displayed OK on the web interface but not on the
Controller until the FW was updated to 7.5.0 r8162 then all seemed well.
However, some of the cover art was not displayed including internet
radio.
Quick review across my collection indicates that the
The main server appears to think MySQL is the database, as it
has no idea that a scan is running, shows no progress, and zero tracks
once the scan completes.
Several people are seeing this problem:
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15208
Every time the server is started it launches a
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
