Hello,
Beyond Linux® From Scratch - Version 2018-10-28
list ConsoleKit2 to be 1.0.2
Current available version is 1.2.1
release date Dec 13,2017
There is LXQT 0.13 which installation procedure
fit perfectly within BLFS spirit (a Make install,
install all components).
Is there a raison why LXQT
Hello,
I found lxqt-0.13 working very well within LFS-8.3, and
I think team should reconsider its decision about it.
Within a private email exchange with Bruce trying to make the point,
he told me "LXQ dependencies are cumbersome, I should consider
to look at XFCE...a lot easier".
Why not, if I
Hello,
[..
easily set the compilation debug flag (?)), and cargo
is embedded with rustc...
Wohhh... I have seen Email with a subject as "I hate rustc".
I don't remember if that came from me, but I at lest share the
sentiment. Unfortunately rust is required for the current firefox,
thunde
Hello,
On 11/01/2018 05:16 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:37:45PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Lets figure this out.
#metoo, "I hate rustc".
- 2 Build, hours apart won't give the same result, event
if it is the same version number.
True. In this w
Hello Ken,
On 11/01/2018 06:46 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 04:59:59PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Firefox is not reliable and I feel it try to outsmart you
(doing things in your back).
at firt glance, falkon seems doing the browser job
Glad it
Hello,
On 11/05/2018 03:03 AM, Richard Melville via blfs-dev wrote:
[..]
> - Rustc project seems to be a biological chimera between
>C (language) and modula2 (units implementation and
>standardization)
> - I wonder if rustc is an experimentation or a "coding bad trip"
On 11/05/2018 02:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
Why on earth do we have a patch for systemd that is 13786 lines long?
The comment says "Fixes security and usability issues discovered since
release." To me NOT making a new release is the mark either lazy or
incompetent program management.
Hello Bruce, Ken, Xi and list
Bruce suggested me to look at XFCE as it should easier
to implement than LXQT, So I compiled XFCE all components.
I do not concur, XFCE depend on rustc (and rustc is an heavy
heavy package), as I reported previously I "drop rustc overboard" and
then implementation
Hello,
On 11/09/2018 03:57 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:19:00PM -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Ken: Installation include browser 'falkon', I found it quite
operational, could you confirm it is better now.
Apart from not opening a
On 11/09/2018 06:50 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:57:44PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:19:00PM -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Ken: Installation include browser 'falkon', I found it quite
operational,
Hello,
Could somebody confirm it is possible to compile
sendmail-8.15.2 with gcc-8.2 (LFS-8.3)
I have strange result (could be my mistake) as
;
tls.c:1747:2: warning: 'RSA_generate_key' is deprecated
[-Wdeprecated-declarations]
rsa_tmp = RSA_generate_key(RSA_KEYLENGTH, RSA_F4, NULL, NU
Hello,
As reported earlier, I am not able to recompile
sendmail-8.15.2.
It is not fully proved but I have strong indication
it is caused by openssl-1.1.[0i,1]
Looking about this, I noticed
LFS is openssl-1.1.1
BLFS is openssl-1.0.2p
(LFS 2018-11-09, BLFS 2018-11-13)
Is this done on purpose? (
Bonjour Alain,
On 11/15/2018 09:24 AM, Alain Toussaint via blfs-dev wrote:
Le jeudi 15 novembre 2018 à 09:09 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
a écrit :
Hello,
As reported earlier, I am not able to recompile
sendmail-8.15.2.
It is not fully proved but I have strong indication
it is
Hello,
[...]
Trouble ahead compiling sendmail (and other?)
using opessl-1.1.1?
Comments?, something I am overlooking?
I don't think so but do try to compile sendmail with openssl-1.0.2p.
I'm pretty sure it will work fine :)
No.
I am very doubtful you can have both openssl-1.0.2p and openssl
Hello,
On 11/15/2018 10:04 AM, Stephen Berman wrote:
[]
Trouble ahead compiling sendmail (and other?)
using opessl-1.1.1?
Comments?, something I am overlooking?
I don't think so but do try to compile sendmail with openssl-1.0.2p.
I'm pretty sure it will work fine :)
No.
I am very doubt
Hello Bruce,
On 11/15/2018 12:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
It appears that Jean-Marc did not look a the sendmail instructions in
BLFS. To me it is pretty obvious that everything is installed in
/usr/{lib,include}/openssl-1.0.
You are absolutely right.
I overlooked the real meaning
On 11/16/2018 09:21 AM, William Harrington wrote:
On 2018-11-15 08:09, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
As reported earlier, I am not able to recompile
sendmail-8.15.2.
It is not fully proved but I have strong indication
it is caused by openssl-1.1.[0i,1]
Looking about this, I
Hello
Suggestions/proposals
CVS version (future BLFS-8.4, Part of BBLFS?)
1) Use sendmail-8.16. it is working with openssl-1.1
(it is in production here).
adjustment to build are very minimal:
APPENDDEF(`confENVDEF',`-DNEWDB -DSTARTTLS -DSASL -DLDAPMAP')
APPENDDEF(`confLIBS', `-lssl -lcrypto
On 11/26/2018 02:08 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 11/26/2018 12:29 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello
Suggestions/proposals
CVS version (future BLFS-8.4, Part of BBLFS?)
1) Use sendmail-8.16. it is working with openssl-1.1
(it is in production here).
adjustment to
Hello Bruce,
Thereis a spec file within the package.
This help me a lot, to define the
make
make install.
On 11/26/2018 03:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 11/26/2018 01:38 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
3) Add lshw, little tool to probe details about desktop/server
Hello,
On 02/08/2019 03:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 02/08/2019 02:37 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi,
Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I a
Hello,
On 02/08/2019 10:50 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
[..]
‘void {anonymous}::DevToolsDataSource::StartRemoteDataRequest(const GURL&,
const GotDataCallback&)’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
void DevToolsDataSource::StartRemoteDataRequest(
^~
nin
Hello Ken,
On 02/09/2019 12:27 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 12:01:43AM -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Pretty sure, it is (my) "code 18"
Please Note, I was blunt saying nothing was change
between the 2 compile process
I was keeping
Hello,
So, qt-5.12.1, qtwebengin-5.12.1 are recompiling.
But I am not able to to recompile falkon.
cmake Compilation say;
Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5X11Extras" with
any of the following names:
Qt5X11ExtrasConfig.cmake
qt5x11extras-config.cmake
Matter
Hello,
On 02/09/2019 09:22 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
So, qt-5.12.1, qtwebengin-5.12.1 are recompiling.
But I am not able to to recompile falkon.
cmake Compilation say;
Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5X11Extras" with
any of the
Bonjour Bruce,
On 02/09/2019 12:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
[..]
Ok, problem was libxkbcommon not installed
while QT was compiled.
This is consistent with modification about
xkbcommon done in QT (between 5.12.0 and 5.12.1)
I suggest to change the BLFS libxkbcommon status
within QT
Bonjour Pierre,
On 02/09/2019 12:44 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
I suggest to change the BLFS libxkbcommon status
within QT page.
Move the need status from "Recommended" to "Required".
Hmmm, not sure it should be done: a dependency is "Required" if building
the package is not possibl
Hello,
Trying to compile Qt-5.12.1 using new compiler gcc-8.3.0
Got and error
../3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/jit/JITStubs.cpp:535:1: error:
expected unqualified-id before string constant
".globl " SYMBOL_STRING(ctiOpThrowNotCaught) "\n"
^
../3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaS
Hello,
On 03/08/2019 12:01 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 3/7/19 10:49 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
Trying to compile Qt-5.12.1 using new compiler gcc-8.3.0
Got and error
../3rdparty/javascriptcore/JavaScriptCore/jit/JITStubs.cpp:535:1:
error: expected
Helo,
Looking for libgnomequery (to compile mate-power-manager)
Seems last libgnomequery last occurrence was in BLFS-7.4
Was it:
"lost in sea"?
Replaced by a more convenient tool? (which one?)
Thanks for the "list enlightenment"
--
seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files
www.osu
Hello Douglas,
On 03/20/2019 12:06 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 3/20/19 11:05 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Helo,
Looking for libgnomequery (to compile mate-power-manager)
Seems last libgnomequery last occurrence was in BLFS-7.4
Was it:
"lost in sea"?
R
Hello
Compiled cups and noticed the "printing-test"
is "strangely" working.
printer: single page mode: one paper sheet printed (OK)
printer: double-side mode: 2 papers sheet printed.
one being double-side, the other being just one side (?)
the 3 test-page iteration show the same correct test co
Hello,
/sbin/ifup was changed between lfs-bootscripts-20180820
and fs-bootscripts-20190524
Sequence
;---
# Bring up the interface
if [ "$VIRTINT" != "yes" ]; then
up ${IFACE}
fi
for S in ${SERVICE}; do
;---
This cause trouble in case you have defined a bridge
Hello DJ,
On 06/10/2019 01:14 AM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On 6/9/2019 3:45 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
/sbin/ifup was changed between lfs-bootscripts-20180820
and fs-bootscripts-20190524
Sequence
;---
# Bring up the interface
if [ "$VIRTINT&quo
On 06/23/2019 05:55 PM, Joe Locash via blfs-dev wrote:
Is there any interest in adding MATE to BLFS? I have it working, just
tweaking the minor issues out.
I second the motion, I have MATE working too, very pleased
by the result...
--
seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files
www.o
Hello,
According compilation logs, graphviz-2.40.1 can't be
successfully compiled IF (and only if) qt-5.12.4 is installed.
Everything else equal, installing back qt-5.12.1
make graphviz compilation a success
Good compilation
;---
~^~~
In file inc
Hello,
FYI
Tried to compile qt-everywhere-src 5.13 and got trouble
;---
socketcanbackend.cpp: In member function ‘void
SocketCanBackend::readSocket()’:
socketcanbackend.cpp:697:41: error: ‘SIOCGSTAMP’ was not declared in
this sco
Pigeon via
blfs-dev wrote:
Solution is to add
#include
within
qt-everywhere-src-5.13.0/qtserialbus/src/plugins/canbus/socketcan/socketcanbackend.cpp
Hoping this help.
(I guess the qt-5.13.0-upstream_fixes-1.patch, need
to be slightly updated :) ).
Sounds as if this is more widespread :-(
https
On 07/21/2019 04:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/21/19 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
On 07/21/2019 01:46 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/20/19 9:21 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:29:51AM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On Sat
Hello,
Trying to compile libreoffice on 8.5 and get an autogen.sh error
;
...
checking whether g++ supports -fno-default-inline... yes
checking whether g++ supports -fno-enforce-eh-specs... yes
checking for posix_fallocate... yes
ch
On 07/30/2019 01:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/30/19 12:39 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
Trying to compile libreoffice on 8.5 and get an autogen.sh error
;
...
checking whether g++ supports -fno
Hello Bruce,
On 07/30/2019 02:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/30/19 1:37 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
On 07/30/2019 01:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 7/30/19 12:39 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
Trying to compile libreoffice on 8.5 and get
On 08/04/2019 02:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
We currently have a ticket,
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/12304, that addresses a
problem introduced by the 5.2 kernel headers.
The problem is that the definitions for SIOCGSTAMP and SIOCGSTAMPNS were
moved from bits/socket.h
Hello,
for team information:
pulseaudio 12.99.1 change headers and
now qtwebengine build is crashing.
this is confirmed by:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-77037
This won't be easy to fix ( :) layering problem )
My advice to team, stay with pulseaudio-12.2 and
wait for dust to settle dow
Hello,
According web page about libvpx-1.8.1, using yasm is
mandatory because:
"compiling with NASM-2.14.02 is currently broken"
I have seen no difference (naked eyes) between
using nasm-2.14.02 or yasm-1.3.0
Both build appear to be successful.
Could someone elaborate about
"currently broken".
On 08/06/2019 09:38 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 06/08/2019 15:03, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According web page about libvpx-1.8.1, using yasm is
mandatory because:
"compiling with NASM-2.14.02 is currently broken"
I have seen no difference (
Hello,
Could someone confirm he is able to display
html5 video using seamonkey (2.49.4)?
Trying to display vimeo.com, seamonkey say
player error...
(obviously there is not flashplayer within BLFS anymore).
Notes:
1) using seamonkey I am able to watch youtube video.
2) using falkon (3.0.1) , I c
On 08/06/2019 10:34 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/6/19 9:15 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
Could someone confirm he is able to display
html5 video using seamonkey (2.49.4)?
Trying to display vimeo.com, seamonkey say
player error...
(obviously there is not
On 08/06/2019 11:36 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/6/19 10:24 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Actually, it is not easy to test that: at a point in nasm life, or
libvpx
life, a release allowed compiling libvpx against nasm again, and
now you see
that. But owing to the heavy wor
On 08/06/2019 11:03 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/6/19 9:52 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
On 08/06/2019 10:34 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/6/19 9:15 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
Could someone confirm he is able to display
html5
Hello,
Seems we have another kernel-5.2, sockio problem...
Building cups-2.2.11 with glibc-2.30+sockio adjustment
(as described in SVN-20190804) cause cups build to fail
at very very early stage...
;---
In file included from /us
Hello,
Got a trouble compiling seamonkey-2.49.4 using glibc-2.30
;
/home/jmp/rpmbuild/BUILD/seamonkey-2.49.4/mozilla/tools/profiler/core/platform.h:68:21:
error: 'pid_t gettid()' was declared 'extern' and later 'static
Hello,
Using gcc-9.1.0 and building aspell-0.60.7
I Removed
#First, fix a problem identified by gcc7
sed -i '/ top.do_check ==/s/top.do_check/*&/' modules/filter/tex.cpp
Got no reported build problem.
I guess it is not needed anymore (as we are using Gcc-9.1.0).
I propose the sed adjustment
On 08/09/2019 02:42 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On 2019-08-09 13:34, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
Using gcc-9.1.0 and building aspell-0.60.7
I Removed
#First, fix a problem identified by gcc7
sed -i '/ top.do_check ==/s/top.do_check/*&/' modules/filter/tex.cpp
G
Hello,
Trying to have all my BLFS up to date ready for the nextfreeze.
Notice ImageMagick-7.0.8-27 can not be downloaded anymore...
According
https://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases/
directory contents.
the last release is 0.8-59
0.8-27 just vanished...
--
seen "Linux from scratch" and
On 08/10/2019 11:14 AM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On August 10, 2019 8:03:22 AM CDT, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev
wrote:
Hello,
Trying to have all my BLFS up to date ready for the nextfreeze.
Notice ImageMagick-7.0.8-27 can not be downloaded anymore...
According
https
Hello,
Help welcome.
Unable to build poppler-0.79, problem stand within openjpeg-2.3.1
Able to build poppler-0.79, with openjpeg-2.3.0.
poppler-0.79.0/poppler/JPEG2000Stream.cc:20:10: fatal error: openjpeg.h:
No such file or directory
20 | #include
compilation terminated.
iIn both build
On 08/10/2019 06:12 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/10/19 2:55 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
Help welcome.
Unable to build poppler-0.79, problem stand within openjpeg-2.3.1
Able to build poppler-0.79, with openjpeg-2.3.0.
poppler-0.79.0/poppler
On 08/10/2019 08:40 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
On 08/10/2019 06:12 PM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/10/19 2:55 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
Help welcome.
Unable to build poppler-0.79, problem stand within openjpeg-2.3.1
Able to build poppler-0.79, with
Hello,
According to me
mkfontscale-1.2.1 is now building mkfontdir too
What is the real/good mkfontdir, the binary from
mkfontdir-1.0.7
or
mkfontscale-1.2.1
??
--
seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files
www.osukiss.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
ht
On 08/12/2019 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/12/19 10:55 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello,
According to me
mkfontscale-1.2.1 is now building mkfontdir too
What is the real/good mkfontdir, the binary from
mkfontdir-1.0.7
or
mkfontscale-1.2.1
Hmm. We have been
Helo,
I am able to build libreoffice-6.3 without trouble
(just few little warnings are reported by CXX)
using Version 2019-08-15 build parameters.
However there a very small problem with libxml2 and
may be I missed something within book.
libxml2 generate include files as
/usr/include/libxml2/li
Hello,
On 08/15/2019 03:20 PM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
I am able to build libreoffice-6.3 without trouble [...]
libxml2 generate include files as
/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/*.h
Confirmed.
setting a symlink as
/usr
Hello,
On 08/15/2019 04:54 PM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
On 08/15/2019 03:20 PM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
setting a symlink as
/usr/include/libxml -> /usr/include/lib
On 08/15/2019 05:49 PM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
first...
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc contents seems ok to me
I did not even mention pkgconfig stuff, because I was rather sure
libxml2 installed it identical for all of us, otherwise
On 08/15/2019 08:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 06:29:05PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
I confirm, configure parameter
--enable-python=system
set to
--enable-python=no
everything else equal
Make lxml missing from tarballs and building
is now
Hello
pango 1.44.5 was issued
(revert a broken change (causing crashes on OS X))
More important, meson configuration variables changed
-Denable-docs is now -Denable-docs
-Dgir is now -Dinstrospection
(this was done with 1.44.0)
--
seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files
www.osukis
Hello
pango 1.44.5 was issued
(revert a broken change (causing crashes on OS X))
More important, meson configuration variables changed
-Denable-docs is now -Dgtk_doc
-Dgir is now -Dinstrospection
(this was done with 1.44.0)
--
seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files
www.osukiss.org
On 08/18/2019 11:40 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/18/19 9:09 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello
pango 1.44.5 was issued
(revert a broken change (causing crashes on OS X))
More important, meson configuration variables changed
-Denable-docs is now -Dgtk_doc
-Dgir is now
On 08/18/2019 01:31 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 12:32:43PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
On 08/18/2019 11:40 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/18/19 9:09 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello
pango 1.44.5 was issued
(revert a
Hello...
I know Pango will stay 1.42.4, just giving a "preview"
and sharing question.
So I was able to do an all out compilation using
Pango-1.44.5
2 casualties
- pygtk
- Handbrake (Upstream being aware about the Pango Problem
and HandBrake not being part of BLFS).
So I Discarded b
Hello
within jdk chapter , in section:
;-
Settting up the JRE Certificate Authority Certificates (cacerts) file
To check the installatiion, issue:
cd /opt/jdk
bin/keytool -list -cacerts
;---
If you follow instruction, a passwor
On 08/22/2019 11:36 AM, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/22/19 7:33 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello
within jdk chapter , in section:
;-
Settting up the JRE Certificate Authority Certificates (cacerts) file
To check the installatiion
On 08/22/2019 12:11 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 22/08/2019 17:36, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/22/19 7:33 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello
within jdk chapter , in section:
;-
Settting up the JRE Certificate
Hello guys (and girls).
I need your wisdom... Let's share a pint of brain juice.
Here's the drill.
context:
- LFS-9.0rc (linux 5.2.8, glibc-2.30, gcc-9.2.0)
- I am able to build libreoffice-6.3.0.4 with all
bells and whistles
(lets assume I didn't really goofed with the book directives).
I am
Hello guys (Ken, DJ and Pierre),
Thanks to have bring your "pint of brain juice".
On 08/26/2019 01:50 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25/08/2019 21:49, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello guys (and girls).
I need your wisdom... Let's share a pint of brain ju
On 08/26/2019 09:23 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello guys (Ken, DJ and Pierre),
Thanks to have bring your "pint of brain juice".
On 08/26/2019 01:50 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25/08/2019 21:49, Jean-Marc Pigeon vi
On 08/26/2019 01:24 PM, dueff...@uwe-dueffert.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
My worry (Hoping to be paranoiac) and this concern the book:
- Libreoffice Book directives are such, that 77 components are
added/downloaded within external/tarballs
On 08/26/2019 02:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
thanks for all your comments...
Ken comment about using 38 external parts instead of 77
is having wide implications.
- You can have a decent libreoffice
Hello Guys,
I really appreciated your help on this story, I (strongly)
believe I found the solution and restarted the full (800) build
(no laughs in the back of the room please) again. It is a 3 hours
process (before I can get the expected result/proof), I am confident
enough about the analyze to
Hello DJ,
On 08/27/2019 01:25 AM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On 8/26/2019 7:22 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
The solution, is to "hardcode" the fact glibc is gnu hash
compatible by inserting "Provides: rtld(GNU_HASH)" within
glibc spec file (a simple mark
Hello team,
Bravo for 9.0 release,
About 9.1 release.
Proposing to replace MUA Heirloom mailx by s-nail
https://www.sdaoden.eu/code.html
Heirloom mailx
- not very alive.
- need patches to be build within BLFS
- no upstream designer.
S-nail
- Mature and alive project
- No patches needed to b
On 09/04/2019 11:04 AM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 9/4/19 6:40 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
Hello team,
Bravo for 9.0 release,
About 9.1 release.
Proposing to replace MUA Heirloom mailx by s-nail
https://www.sdaoden.eu/code.html
Heirloom mailx
- not very alive.
- need
6:40 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
|>> Hello team,
|>>
|>> Bravo for 9.0 release,
|>>
|>> About 9.1 release.
|>> Proposing to replace MUA Heirloom mailx by s-nail
|>> https://www.sdaoden.eu/code.html
|>>
|>> Heirl
Hello
According to me qt wayland patch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/qt-5.14.0-qtwayland_cursor_fix-1.patch
Is missing altogether from site:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/
possible?
--
You have seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files
www.osuki
Hello Doug...
On Wed, 2019-12-25 at 16:48 -0600, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 12/25/19 4:43 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > According to me qt wayland patch
> > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/qt-5.14.0-q
Hello
I was not able to recompile libreoffice and webkitgtk
with installed icu-65.
Problem is related to U16_NEXT macro.
about webkitgtk, I "sed" few sources
;--
#To fix a Bug within URLHelpers.cpp
sed -i
Hello Bruce,
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 10:50 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> The latest version of xterm has this in the NEWS file:
>
> * modify run-tic.sh to prefer development version of ncurses since
>changes to terminfo file in patch #345 rely upon bug-fixes in
>ncurses
>
> I do
Hello,
I was unable to successfully compile llvm-9.0.1 while
having glibc-2.31 installed.
./projects/compiler-
rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h:342:70: error: size
'-1' of array 'assertion_failed__1131' is negative
342 | typedef char IMPL_PASTE(assertion_failed_##_,
line)[2
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 09:48 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 2/6/20 8:44 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was unable to successfully compile llvm-9.0.1 while
> > having glibc-2.31 installed.
> >
> > ./project
Hello,
I have strong indication openjdk-12.0.2+10 can NOT be build
while make-4.3 is installed (build possible downgrading to make-4.2.1)
;---
make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/home/jmp/rpmbuild/BUILD/jdk12u-
jdk-12.0.2+10/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/make-
support/vardeps/make/
Hello,
hwclock --htctosys
is not working anymore
-->> hwclock: settimeofday() failed: Invalid argument
I have hint about the fact it could be a glibc-2.31 related problem
https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,1311.msg9179.html
Could someone concur about hwclck malfunction?
is there a
Hello,
On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 16:22 -0600, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 3/5/20 3:20 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > hwclock --htctosys
> > is not working anymore
> >
> > -->> hwclock: settimeofday()
Hello,
According to me, kernel 5.6 is now "mainline" and stable.
Is there something wrong with 5.6 such LFS SVN-20200401
is not including the 5.6 family??
My own point of interest with 5.6 is the time_namespace
(for containers).
Is 5.6.2 too new to be considered for the (B)LFS project?
--
You
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 12:43 -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 4/3/20 12:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > On 4/3/20 11:47 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
> > > wrote:
> > > >
re Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 10:18 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-
> > > > > dev
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On 4/3/20 9:35 AM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello,
>
Bonjour Pierre,
On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 18:28 +0200, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> Transcode is an old, unmaintained, transcoder for video and audio.
> I've made a patch to allow building it with GCC 10, but I am not sure
> how to test it. So maybe time to drop it...
> At this point, I've di
Hello,
OpenJDK do not compile with gcc-10
Was successfull with attached patch sequence
(hope that help)
--
You have seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files
www.osukiss.org
diff -rupN jdk14u-jdk-14.0.1+7.orig/src/java.base/unix/native/libjava/childproc.c jdk14u-jdk-14.0.1+7/src/java
Hello,
Trying to compile seamonkey-2.53.2 and beeing not successful.
at first I was thinking about a gcc10 problem, but it is not
the case.
The error is within:
mozilla/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/modules/video_coding/codecs/vp9/vp9_i
mpl.cc
seamonkey-
2.53.2/mozilla/media/webrtc/trunk/webrtc/mod
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 12:50 -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 5/26/20 12:35 PM, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Trying to compile seamonkey-2.53.2 and beeing not successful.
> > at first I was thinking about a gcc10 problem,
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
