--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't use it in the SOU. You don't insult the
british by not using the information. But by the way
why is it as is usual? It would seem to me in
something this important the british could share
their specific information. I would suspect that
more often
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 12:45 AM 8/2/03 +1000, Ray Ludenia wrote:
Doug Pensinger wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
However, there's at least one spiral galaxy which apparently rotates
backwards:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2002/release_2002_33.html
Must be in the Southern
On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 03:00 am, Deborah Harrell wrote:
I have heard the name of Noam Chomsky - um, I thought
he was a poet...
Anyone who has studied either linguistics or computer science has
definitely come across Chomsky. As for his political writings -
geniuses are often strange
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This speculation raises several questions in my mind: if Saddam destroyed his
nukes - WHY DIDN'T HE TELL US??? That's what we wanted, after all, what we
were demanding, the ostensible reason for the invasion. Why do what he was
supposed to but not gain any benefit
Julia Thompson wrote:
Ray Ludenia wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
Wouldn't you have a chip on your shoulder after a while as well? You know,
having a chip on your shoulder doesn't mean there is anything wrong with
you.
Actually, having a chip on both shoulders is better. It keeps one
At 11:21 PM 8/2/2003 +1000, you wrote:
Julia Thompson wrote:
Ray Ludenia wrote:
Jan Coffey wrote:
Wouldn't you have a chip on your shoulder after a while as well? You
know,
having a chip on your shoulder doesn't mean there is anything wrong with
you.
Actually, having a chip on both
From: Reggie Bautista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yikes! I'm glad everything went well. How did you first
discover the granuloma?
At first, I had a symptom where it felt like there was something in
my throat all the time. My doctor, unfortunately, misdiagnosed it
and thought it was
At 09:25 PM 7/22/2003 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which of course is what
this all about.So many Democrats turned a blind
eye to Clinton's
perjury
But this is where you are precisely wrong John. No democrat
defended
Clinton this. Not one said he was right
Au contraire a great
- Original Message -
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Intent and language
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:21:49PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
I have gone over your posts to make sure my memory
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 12:17:24PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
You mean did I miss the fact that you were playing the look at me,
I'm so clever, I'm mocking someone with their own words game?
What happened to I'll be happy to assume good intentions?
No, I just considered that of secondary
Dan Minette wrote:
ORIFLAMME.
ORIFLAMME?
OK, I know that my mind is being dissolved by so many hormones and so
many other things to think about (such as pending lactation), but I
can't figure this one out even with some effort.
Julia
___
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: Intent and language
Dan Minette wrote:
ORIFLAMME.
ORIFLAMME?
OK, I know that my mind is being dissolved by so many
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
...
Katha Pollitt, among many other things, famously
forbade her daughter from flying an American flag
after September 11th because it was a symbol of, IIRC,
jingoism and hate.
If that _doesn't_ bother you, then it explains why the
left has no traction in the United
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of John D. Giorgis
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words
At 09:25 PM 7/22/2003 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which of course is what
this all about.So
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Julia Thompson
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Intent and language
Dan Minette wrote:
ORIFLAMME.
ORIFLAMME?
OK, I know that my mind is being dissolved by so many hormones
At 04:34 PM 8/2/2003 -0400 Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of John D. Giorgis
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 12:46 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words
At 09:25 PM 7/22/2003 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John D. Giorgis wrote:
...
Bob Z. said that no Democrat defended Clinton on this.
In my mind, Bob Z.'s claim is patently absurd. Many Democrats did argue
that any man would lie about adultery, and the only possible reason for
making such a claim was to attempt to mitigate the charges
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of David Hobby
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words
Which of course is what
this all about.So many Democrats turned a blind
eye to Clinton's
perjury
What democrats said that it was acceptable for Clinton to lie under
oath?
I don't know what other Democrats may have said. I never said it was
acceptable for him to lie under oath. I just didn't think it was an impeachable
offense.
I also think he should never have been forced to face
--- Matt Grimaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So then the President used information that
ultimately
came from French Intelligence, a country which his
own
administration has all but accused of having a
conflict
of interest wrt Iraq? This sounds worse than
before.
-- Matt
No, he used
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Seth Finkelstein on 16 words
--- Matt Grimaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So then the President used information that
--- David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where have you been? Everybody uses symbols
differently,
of course. But I saw many flying the flag who
seemed to do so out
of some mix of patriotism, jingoism and hate.
(Anyway, they would
say things like Kill all Arabs!)
When others
I'm going to Scotland tomorrow to see my son, Ted, in Shogun MacBeth at the
Churchhill theater in Edinburg. I'll be staying with friends who live
north of Aberdeen. One of the side benefits of Teri being on leave with
Continental.
Dan M.
___
--- Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How likely is it that the French deliberately set
Bush ?
Dan M.
Ah, now _there_ you have the billion dollar question.
I'm suspicious enough of the French to say it's
possible, but I don't think it's likely. I frankly
don't think that the French
So her rhetoric is over-the-top, but her basic
position
doesn't seem too far out.
The prosecution rests.
Huh? What does that mean? How does what he said prove the case? It seems to
me the opposite. She has been put forward as an example of an extremist whom
liberals should
From: William T Goodall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm 1115 behind :) I don't know whether to admit defeat or
not...
It's not as bad as another list where I am 41359 behind...
I think it's time to quit that particular list!
Sheesh, and I thought 200 behind was bad...
- jmh
From: Jan Coffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loo-tin-at Ker-nal.
Ah, heck. I can't spell Lt either. One of those words that I've
never been able to get down. Kinda like caffeine, vacuum and
torture. (Spell check caught those!)
- jmh
___
Spoiler warning!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Reggie Bautista wrote:
David Hobby wrote:
I kept hoping that Harry's anger would be
partially explained as psychic overflow
from Voldermort. I guess that it still could be,
but the evidence so far points to Harry being a
rather large
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
...
When others have contaminated a symbol with things
one
does not believe in, one reasonable response is to
avoid using
the symbol. (Another is to attempt to reclaim it,
but either
should be fair.)
So her rhetoric is over-the-top, but her basic
At 05:33 PM 8/2/03 -0500, Horn, John wrote:
From: Jan Coffey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loo-tin-at Ker-nal.
Ah, heck. I can't spell Lt either.
Unlike the old joke about engineer, I never learned how to spell it
correctly despite being one.
One of those words that I've
never been able to
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:06:22PM -0700, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:18:22 -0700 (PDT), Gautam Mukunda wrote:
But that seems to be _your_ argument. If we understand why they
are angry at us and seek to act in such a way as to assuage
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:28:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:06:22PM -0700, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:18:22 -0700 (PDT), Gautam Mukunda wrote:
But that seems to be _your_ argument. If we
--- David Hobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This argument has many flaws, but the most
important
one is that I do not have any clear idea of who
Katha Pollit
is, and might well have misspelled her name
repeatedly. : )
I was responding to YOUR examples of her
extremism.
She might
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh? What does that mean? How does what he said
prove the case? It seems to
me the opposite. She has been put forward as an
example of an extremist whom
liberals should denounce. But the examples given
make her seem somewhat less
extreme to me than, say, a
34 matches
Mail list logo
