Nope. If convicted, he faces a year in jail. Mandatory.
hmmm, maybe he shoulda took the deal.
john
On Sunday, March 2, 2003, at 10:45 AM, Paul Walker wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:24:56AM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
You have to understand the enviromental idiom concerning weapons over
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Gary L. Nunn
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:48 PM
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion'
Subject: RE: Brooklyn Dad Facing Jail for Shooting Intruder
I wrote
So you are saying that the homeowner should NOT have protected his
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 05:46:11PM -0800, Doug Pensinger wrote:
I agree. Fine him $100 and close the books.
At which point, every loon goes out and buys a gun, 'cause they figure the
worst they'll get is a $100 fine. Nice one.
The real problem here is the cop that investigated the crime.
At 19:14 1-3-2003 -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
In any case, using a law that was designed to fight gangbangers
Huh? I am familiar with the meaning of the word gangbang (and thus with
the meaning of the words gangbanger and gangbanging), but I can assure
you that it has nothing to do with
At 20:48 1-3-2003 -0500, Gary Nunn wrote:
I don't disagree with you, but sending the man to jail with a possible
felony for defending his family is an abuse of what the original intent
of the law was.
That's rhetoric, not fact, Gary. The guy is not going on trial for
defending his family, he is
- Original Message -
From: Paul Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 6:31 AM
Subject: Re: Brooklyn Dad Facing Jail for Shooting Intruder
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 05:46:11PM -0800, Doug Pensinger wrote:
I agree. Fine him
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:24:56AM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
You have to understand the enviromental idiom concerning weapons over
here. Gun ownership is common. So common in fact that every loon already
has one, and they dont have to get a permit to do so. All that is required
is a
Rob wrote
Contrary to the rumors circling the globe, US citizens don't
run around waving their guns in the air or shooting beer
bottles off handy fence rails. People are much more discrete
than that. (And I'm in Texas in case you don't
recall) To see Americans shooting guns you pretty
rob wrote:
Contrary to the rumors circling the globe, US citizens dont run around
waving their guns in the air or shooting beer bottles off handy fence
rails.
People are much more discrete than that. (And I'm in Texas in case you dont
recall) To see Americans shooting guns you pretty much have to
On 2 Mar 2003 at 10:58, Robert Seeberger wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:24:56AM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
You have to understand the enviromental idiom concerning weapons
over here. Gun ownership is common. So common in fact that every
loon already has one, and they dont have
Jeroen wrote:
Besides, I think the I would be out of a job statement is a lame excuse;
mr. Dixon *knew* he was breaking the law by owning an unlicensed gun. If
he's going to lose his job because of it, well, that's his own fault -- he
should have thought of that before he decided to keep an
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Contrary to the rumors circling the globe, US citizens dont run around
waving their guns in the air or shooting beer bottles off handy fence rails.
People are much more discrete than that. (And I'm in Texas in case you dont
recall) To see Americans shooting guns you
Julia wrote:
There are the occasional yahoo redneck exceptions, but they tend to keep it
out in the country, where no
one else is going to get hit.
You forgot the (tm) after yahoo... :-)
Reggie Bautista
[sung in country music voice] Dot Com [spoken ala James Earl Jones] Maru
Reggie Bautista wrote:
Julia wrote:
There are the occasional yahoo redneck exceptions, but they tend to keep it
out in the country, where no
one else is going to get hit.
You forgot the (tm) after yahoo... :-)
No, that's Yahoo!(tm). I was referring to a certain class of people, not a
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 10:58:35AM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
The fact that of all the Americans you have known, hardly any of them have
died from gunshot wounds, and that should tell you something about the
actual state of things here. I rarely see a firearm, and if I do its
True. (I'll
There was a stranger in the house. When Dixon saw the intruder enter his
young son's room, he grabbed his 9 mm pistol, loaded it, and moved to
the entrance of the boy's room. He saw the man rifling through drawers,
and said, What are you doing in my house?
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
My opinion: I am a bit torn on this one. I am absolutely in favor or
self defense, especially in the home, but he did have an unlicensed gun
in New York. But I am annoyed that the burglar was let go on probation
(the first time) and now the dad is facing jail time for self
- Original Message -
From: Gary L. Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brin Mail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 8:18 AM
Subject: Brooklyn Dad Facing Jail for Shooting Intruder
My opinion: I am a bit torn on this one. I am absolutely in favor or
self defense, especially
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
My opinion: I am a bit torn on this one. I am absolutely in favor or
self defense, especially in the home, but he did have an unlicensed gun
in New York. But I am annoyed that the burglar was let go on probation
(the first time) and now the dad is facing jail time for
--- Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
My opinion: I am a bit torn on this one. I am
absolutely in favor or
self defense, especially in the home, but he did
have an unlicensed gun
in New York. But I am annoyed that the burglar was
let go on probation
(the
So license the gun and fine the guy.
What was the other SOB doing in his house?
George A
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: Brooklyn Dad Facing Jail
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: Brooklyn Dad Facing Jail for Shooting Intruder
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
My opinion: I am a bit torn on this one. I am absolutely
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: Brooklyn Dad Facing Jail for Shooting Intruder
On 1 Mar 2003 at 16:53, Julia Thompson wrote:
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
My
on owning guns.
George A
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Crystall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: Brooklyn Dad Facing Jail for Shooting Intruder
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
My opinion: I am a bit
On 1 Mar 2003 at 18:58, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Gary L. Nunn wrote:
My opinion: I am a bit torn on this one. I am absolutely in
favor
or
self defense, especially in the home, but he did have an
unlicensed gun in New York. But I am annoyed that the burglar was
let go on
One, there's a criminal who broke and entered, and thus must be
punished for such.
Two, there's a criminal who owned and fired a unliscenced gun, and
thus must be punished for such.
Andy
Dawn Falcon
So you are saying that the homeowner should NOT have protected his
family with the gun
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Unless Brooklyn has somehow migrated to the UK, your point lacks something
by the way of relevence. Most places in the US dont have the type of gun
registration cited. Without more information it is difficult to say if there
might have been an honest mistake made in
On 1 Mar 2003 at 17:46, Doug Pensinger wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Unless Brooklyn has somehow migrated to the UK, your point lacks
something by the way of relevence. Most places in the US dont have
the type of gun registration cited. Without more information it is
difficult to say if
On 1 Mar 2003 at 20:31, Gary L. Nunn wrote:
One, there's a criminal who broke and entered, and thus must be
punished for such.
Two, there's a criminal who owned and fired a unliscenced gun, and
thus must be punished for such. Andy Dawn Falcon
So you are saying that the homeowner
I wrote
So you are saying that the homeowner should NOT have protected his
family with the gun because it wasn't licensed?
Andy
Dawn Falcon wrote
I'm saying that because he had and fired an unlicensed gun he needs
to be punished for that.
I don't disagree with you, but sending
On 1 Mar 2003 at 20:48, Gary L. Nunn wrote:
I wrote
So you are saying that the homeowner should NOT have protected his
family with the gun because it wasn't licensed?
Andy
Dawn Falcon wrote
I'm saying that because he had and fired an unlicensed gun he needs
to be punished
I wrote.
In Ohio one can own a gun without a license, but in the
near future,
you will need a license to carry a concealed weapon.
Andy
Dawn Falcon wrote
As far as I'n concerned, that's nuts. Means you can have people who
don't know gun safety...
At least in Israel,
On 1 Mar 2003 at 21:18, Gary L. Nunn wrote:
I wrote.
In Ohio one can own a gun without a license, but in the
near future,
you will need a license to carry a concealed weapon.
Andy
Dawn Falcon wrote
As far as I'n concerned, that's nuts. Means you can have people who
At 08:31 PM 3/1/03 -0500, Gary L. Nunn wrote:
One, there's a criminal who broke and entered, and thus must be
punished for such.
Two, there's a criminal who owned and fired a unliscenced gun, and
thus must be punished for such.
Andy
Dawn Falcon
So you are saying that the homeowner should
On 2 Mar 2003 at 0:16, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 08:31 PM 3/1/03 -0500, Gary L. Nunn wrote:
One, there's a criminal who broke and entered, and thus must be
punished for such.
Two, there's a criminal who owned and fired a unliscenced gun, and
thus must be punished for such. Andy
35 matches
Mail list logo
