Darren, besides the options mentioned so far, I'll note that I did a blog
entry a couple months ago where I tried to gather in one place all the
various ways, with links to resources with still more details:
"How can I process Excel files in CFML? Let me count the ways"
http://ca
I was about to make the same point, Peter, and checked before sending my
note to see yours. :-) Here's some more I was going to add:
The raw numbers of Adobe Community Experts may not be as high as MVPs, but
then the MS pool of developers (across all products) is just that much
larger. I suspe
Thanks for sharing that, Phil.
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Phil Haeusler
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:41 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] cfpdf action="merge" - CF 8 Update 1
Just to let you all know that of a r
Thanks also for the news of RocketUnit, Phil. I'd missed that and have
added it to the list I keep
(http://www.carehart.org/resourcelists/tools_to_consider/index.cfm#codetest,
along with a few hundred other tools that may be of interest to CFers). Glad
to hear you're liking it.
So Robin, would
Wow, very helpful. Thanks, Mr B.
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MrBuzzy
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 7:52 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: CF 8 Update 1
George, I'm not saying you're wrong, you're just not 100%
Taco, I don't use the upload feature myself, but I wonder if one of the
options in the preferences>sites tab may help. Similarly, have you looked at
the "advanced" tab for the site setup? Any of those settings may help. Of
course, features may also depend on the version of DW you're running (MX, MX
Good on ya, Pete. :-) And good point about how more may be being done than
is recognized. We clearly have a large hill to climb, and it may seem like
we're making no progress. Good to point out that there are indeed some
efforts underway.
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[E
I'm really not looking to pick a fight, but folks keep praising the points
Scott made, yet I found quite a few that I'd contend:
> The difference between an MVP and Adobe CE is folks are measured yearly on
their efforts. For example, if you make MVP this year
> because you did an outstanding
Kai, I don't disagree with anything you say, but really none of those points
counter what I'd brought up. Perhaps you thought I was trying to argue
against what you say, but I was just responding to the specific points I
referenced in Scott's post. I wasn't saying I disagreed with everything he
sa
Sorry we'll miss you, Barry. And I realize you're asking more about those in
A/NZ, but FWIW I'll say that like Mark, I'll be there and will be
presenting.
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Barry Beattie
Sent: Saturday, Apr
27;ve
layed out my opinion, some weak data points in the armour of that which is
Coldfusion and it's entirely up to you to digest them, reject them or use
them.
Be clear however, there are more folks out there using alternative langaues
today than Coldfusion. Why, are they all morons? what
Oh it's trailing off, all right, and honestly I don't see the point in
contributing any further to the headaches which surely must be arising from
this.
Let me state for the record: I'm not anti-Microsoft. I'm not even anti
ASP.NET. I'm also not anti-Scott.
I was just refuting specific st
Michael, besides some of the other CF-oriented hosts people have mentioned,
I'll point out as well that hosting alternatives is one the categories in my
list of 400+ tools and resources of interest to CFers:
http://www.carehart.org/resourcelists/tools_to_consider/index.cfm#cfhost
I didn't mentio
That's great, Robin. Thanks. You can pick the date/time you prefer. We meet
on Thursdays, and as I said I'm open to moving the meeting time around the
clock to make things easier for folks around the world. Next week is taken
but after that is open. If you wanted to pick a date and time, recall my
Again, not trying to pick a fight (or let me put it more plainly: please
don't jump on me about this Scott), but I do want to offer another
clarification. Scott writes, "you have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the boys from the
US at
WebDU, put together your draft plan on how to change the world, one CF st
Lucien, what version of CF are you running? Assuming it's CF7 or above, take
a look at the Client Variables page in the CF Admin. There's a setting at
the bottom for purge interval. The default is 1 hour 7 minutes, and if your
problem of problems "every now and again" matched that interval, I'd pr
Yep, it's only in Enterprise or the Developer edition.
But that's where folks on Standard (or 6 or 7) can look at FusionReactor
(fusion-reactor.com) or SeeFusion (seefusion.com).
For any interested in exploring the CF8 Monitor, I've done a 4 part series
on it, which introduces all sorts of hidde
be a permalink to
that on the boards i reckon...
On Apr 15, 6:57 am, "charlie arehart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Michael, besides some of the other CF-oriented hosts people have
mentioned,
> I'll point out as well that hosting alternatives is one the categories in
my
>
"Knock it off?"
Goodness, Scott, why can't someone offer a correction to something you say
without it seeming to be tantamount to a request for a duel?
I'm, as always, just trying to help folks. I don't have the emotional/ego
investment that it seems you think I do. Anyone else want to sp
<http://www.rocketboots.com.au> www.rocketboots.com.au
On 15/04/2008, at 6:57 AM, charlie arehart wrote:
That's great, Robin. Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
And if it can't be recorded at that event for some reason, I'd be happy to
have Dale present it on the online CF meetup (coldfusionmeetup.com). We
record all our meetings (recordings.coldfusionmeetup.com).
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Georg
(Just to be clear, he was responding to George, not to me. People can
certainly ask questions on the CF meetup, via the chat window. It's indeed
one of the things people like so much about the meetup. It's more than just
a one-way presentation.)
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mai
Good catch, Andrew. As for "something that can fix", it seems worth noting
that the .NET integration is indeed separately installed from CF, so it
seems you don't need to reinstall all of CF. Can't tell if you already knew
that, so sorry if it's not the useful info you were looking for. You mention
ty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613 9015 8628
Mobile: 0404 998 273
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of charlie arehart
Sent: Thursday, 17 April 2008 1:12 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: .net and coldfusion 8u1
Good catch, Andrew
Andrew, I read your post, and the entire thread. I really do try to be
careful and helpful in my posts, and I'm sorry that my attempts to help just
continue to frustrate you. You needn't worry about it happening again,
really.
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Congrats, Dale, and thanks for the effort. There are lots of people often
asking for such CF/Flex integration resources. I'm sure it will be very much
appreciated.
Of course, half the battle is getting people to realize that it's there. To
that end, I'll note that I've added it to my list of
Hello my Aussie friends, I wanted to let you know that today (your Friday)
we will be having the Online CF Meetup event at a special time, more
conducive to you (and many others around the world). We normally meet at
noon and 6pm US EDT, but today's meeting will be at 11pm (Thursday, US EDT).
That
Wow, what a bummer to hear. The good news is that the meeting URL is always
the same: http://experts.acrobat.com/cfmeetup
And yes, our meetings are always recorded. Sorry, Barry, but it's just not
something I ever hide. :-) I trust that those who want to interact will show
up, and it's totally ok
You sure about that, guys? I have done testing that confirms that the TIMEOUT
works on CFHTTP and CFINVOKE of a web service. I’ve tested this on both 7 and 8.
I wonder if you may instead be hitting a problem, Matthew, where the web
service you’re invoking is in fact on the same CF server *fro
BTW, I should have added that Mr B is in fact correct about how otherwise CF’s
server-wide timeout does NOT interrupt a long-running request, including CFHTTP
or CFINVOKE webservice calls that don’t have their own timeout. It is indeed a
real bummer and a source of frequent confusion, as people
Zac, your idea is interesting, but the short timeout would not be helpful.
The lock timeout only says how long a contending lock request would be
willing to wait. In the case Matthew describes, if he was going to use a
lock to prevent concurrent execution of the code, he'd really want a very
long
Matthew, what version of CF are you running? I said I've demonstrated that
CF 7 and 8 WILL timeout a CFINVOKE webservice call. I showed the error
message I get when it does that.
As for FusionReactor "chewing up disk space", I have to ask what you mean.
It has a fixed default max file size of 10
Matthew mentions the challenge of getting thread dumps in this later note.
Just to clarify (as I wrote my last note before reading this one), the
"thread dump" referred to here is in fact the same general idea as the stack
trace I referred to. The good news again, if you use any of the 3 monitors,
Sure, happy to help. Apologies, at least, to those who don't like long
emails. But challenges like this can require this kind of back and forth to
narrow things down.
Let's start with your first point, "I know you've run tests to prove to
yourself that a CFINVOKE web service call will timeout but
Yes, Mark makes a good point. You are saying these are the same problems,
right? I didn't pick up on it earlier, but when you said that when things
hang, there's high cpu, that really does seem to point to a very different
problem.
I'll go back to my previous point: I'd be VERY interested if you
Wow, all that on a mobile. What a trooper. :-) Must be that clean NSW air there
in Goulburn.
Fair enough on the confirmation of another instance of CFINVOKE of a webservice
with a timeout not doing so. Would love to get to the bottom of things I really
do wonder if the hangup's in the waiting
So my quip about clean NSW air was made without any knowledge of fires.
Bummer. I wasn't being sarcastic. :-(
As for FusionReactor (it's spelled without a space, like CF), the 2.0
version will work. But you can upgrade to 2.04 to get all the fixes and
enhancements. More, including the steps and t
No, you can't with FR get any sort of profile of what lines were slowest
within a request. Only the CF8 Server monitor has the depth of insight to
report that. What I had been referring to is if you can catch the request
WHILE it's running, in which case you can get a stack trace by clicking a
but
No worries. Just a couple of quick replies:
> @Charlie;
> 1. Sorry I did miss your joke.
No, no. The point was I wasn't making a joke (in my reference to clean air
in Goulburn for Matt). When you said to MrB that there were fires, I wanted
to clarify that my earlier comment wasn't a joke. I live
Well, before you get too excited, be careful that you're not
misunderstanding the report. The memory reported there is NOT for the
current request, but rather for the entire CF server. So that number alone
isn't too meaningful. But if it ROSE by 32 meg when you ran a request, that
would be differe
OK, so I just looked a little closer, and I see that while both our stack
traces show being in a socketread0, there's more to the story. When my code
is stuck on the CFINVOKE, I see something different from you.
For one thing, notice that at the bottom of my stack trace (below), I see
the line of
Oh, no waste of time, and no worries.
And yes, I'd noted the SSL stuff, too, in my last note. Between that and all
the XML libraries being executed, there's clearly a difference between what
you showed and what I did.
So when we say CFINVOKE can't be interrupted, it sure seems to be dependent
o
Doh, meant to send this off last night but somehow never did. You offer your
stack trace showing that a thread doing a CFHTTP with a timeout lives long
past the timeout. Well, as I said, I DO find that it times out for me.
Again, here's the stack trace while it's waiting, just before it gets timed
Claude, here are a couple other thoughts, first on detecting whose locking a
file, then on getting more cfmail logging info.
First, you say a file "could not be deleted each time I tried to it said
this file is being used by another process". While I can't recall that as a
specific issue with ma
But what do you mean by the stack trace showing that "fine so where is it
caught up and not resolving"?
A stack trace in and of itself isn't valuable. You need to see it over time.
You also said, "I also monitored several of the long running threads (around
2 minutes) and capture several stack tr
Matthew, it sounds like you're asking not so much "is the xml bigger or
smaller after xmlparse", in terms of the internal structs/arrays, but rather
in terms of the output when dumped. Am I reading that right?
Sure, when you dump something it's a lot larger because under the covers the
page (or e
Well, I was simply responding to this in your note:
"The reason I ask is because recently my inbox exploded due to an error on
the server which resulted in error emails being send out and the error just
so happened to be on a page where there was a large XML object (I output all
available variabl
Thanks for sharing that, Barry. What he's referring to is the online CF
Meetup, an entirely online (and an official Adobe) CF user group. I'm the
organizer (and not the speaker for this talk, as noted in Barry's subject).
We try to meet weekly, and have speakers from the world over. More at
coldfu
Yep. I hadn't last posted it there night because I had to run to a meeting,
but I did this morning (it's 1030am here in the US east). For those who
missed it, it's been rated 5 stars by those who've rated it
(http://www.meetup.com/coldfusionmeetup/calendar/9558430/).
FWIW, I'll point out that nex
I assume you're referring to the CF 8 Enterprise Server Monitor. So are you
saying that you see no alert being taken (in the interface or in the
logs/snapshots directory)? Is there any error, in the CF logs or runtime
logs (or jrun4/logs, if running multiserver)? The snapshot is a pretty
simple sma
Wow, that's curious (that you can create it manually, but it doesn't run if
triggered automatically). I really can't see why that would be. Will look
forward to hearing the solution to that.
As for not getting emails, are you saying you know the issues causing it? A
common one (that isn't at al
Scott, yes, you can abort requests in the CF8 Server monitor. But note that
you need to enable the "start monitoring" button to be able to see the
running requests on the "active requests" screen. If you do, then when you
see a request running, it will have a red exclamation which when you mouse
o
Glad you sorted it, Mike.
BTW, speaking of providing date entry mechanisms, some may have missed that
CF 8 added something new. It's quite easy to use:
Some Date:
This creates a simple and fairly nice popup calendar (HTML-based). Don't
confuse this with the older CFCALENDAR which came out i
Theo, I've had better experiences (with both the CF 8 debugger and
FusionDebug, for those using CF 6 or 7). I assume you're referring to the
feature built into CF 8, though. As for the limited variable scopes, that's
controllable in the Eclipse preferences page for the debugger (which may be
under
That brings to mind another tip: when stepping through code, favor using
"step over" versus "step into" when not on CF tags like CFINCLUDE, CFINVOKE,
CFMODULE, etc. For those, sure, use Step Into if you really do want to open
the file they will execute, But if you use Step Into on other tags (that
As may be no surprise to some, I'll point out that I have a category of such
tools at my CF411 site:
WYSIWYG/Rich Text Editors
http://www.cf411.com/#rich
Most are free, a couple commercial. They vary in technology (a detail which
I don't track), Drew, so I'll leave it for you to explore if any m
Hey Stephen, the issue is that hotfixes (and CHFs) don't change the "update
version" (on the CF Admin system settings page). You can see them (the
individual hotfix jars) listed instead in the "java class path" field on the
same Admin page.
This is clarified in a CF8 technote (http://www.adobe.c
There is a getClientIp method in the coldfusion.runtime.SessionScope.
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Brontojoris
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 1:06 AM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Find IP address for JSessi
Steve, it's not clear: did you see Simon's suggestion about sending the html
first? I assume he meant sending both the HTML and the text versions in one
email, using CFMAILPART. Are you in fact using that, and if so, have you
tried putting the HTML version first? I'd not heard of the problem before
Hi Andrew, yes, you could implement Derby in embedded mode in CF 7, or as
you note, you could instead run it in its server mode and have a CF DSN
point to that. It's just that for CF 7, it's not provided for you by Adobe
but instead you need to go get it from the Derby site, and then to sue the
em
Great to hear. Thanks.
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Andrew Myers
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 6:51 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Apache Derby & CF7
Hi Charlie,
Thank you kindly
I've not seen that issue, no. As for whether it would occur in CF8, well, I
don't know. I don't have any clob data to be able to tell. Here's one
thought: in the "advanced settings" for a DSN (in the CF Admin) there is an
option to enable/disable blob/clob support. What happens if you toggle that?
Claude, this is an area of frequent confusion, as things have changed over
the years, but there's very good news if you're on CF 7 or higher.
What you refer to as code "encryption" was more properly renamed to
"encoding" in the CF 5 or 6 timeframe, and the corresponding command line
tool ([cf]/bi
Well, the SQL statements aren't turned into anything other than the text
that they are. It's the CF tags and functions that are transformed into
calls and references to underlying java objects. So you can't achieve
perfect obfuscation, no.
I should add that some may note that there are tools tha
As for this idea of debugging using http sniffer tools, I'll note that there
are still more choices beyond Charles and Firebug. Some are tied to a
specific browser, while others more generic; some are tied to a given OS,
while others are cross-platform; some free, while others are some
commercial.
Ryan, here are a couple of stabs in the dark:
First, if you flush the template cache (in the CF Admin, on the "caching"
page, clicking the button at the bottom for "clear template cache now").
Does that at least solve the problem? It would only be temporary, but it
would prove that the problem i
Ah right, shared hosting. :-( Forgot. (And yes, those really are tragic
replies you're getting from them.)
Here's one more simple possible explanation and fix. It could be that while
you were uploading the file, someone requested it right while it was being
uploaded, which would have involved
Matthew, in your example you're just expecting to get the WSDL back, right?
When you do a "view source", what do you see? It should be a lot of SOAP
XML. If it's anything else, it could give you clues as to an error in the
code (Even as simpler as the CFC is, and it did work for me.) But do note
t
Fair point, Kai.
And in case one can't use the servicefactory approach described there (which
is technically unsupported and often disabled by the Admin's on a shared
host), here are a couple other solutions.
The first is how one can do it with the Admin API (as of 7), but it does
require k
Hey Kai, this is a great idea. I've had some people on my CFMeetup
(coldfusionmeetup.com) also ask for such a time for just "hanging out"
together virtually, as opposed the more typical lecture time from one of our
several dozen speakers over the past two years.
We did it on an ad hoc basis ju
Great to hear. I'll check for more details in my morning. 'night all. :-)
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Matthew
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:21 PM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Web service not working
Ryan, had you seen the note I'd shared with more ideas and possible
explanations, attached?
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Ryan Sabir
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:24 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject:
Well, I think that's the challenge with really trying to roll this around
the world. Your Friday afternoon at 4 NZ time is our midnight the night
before (I mistakenly said 10pm in an earlier thread). So to really have it
roll we would need someone else to bridge the gap of 16 hours if we wanted
to
Fair enough. I had one other thought I'd forgotten to mention: if it is
indeed a matter of the template cache having cached a 404 error, there's
still one more thing you can do in a more programmatic fashion, since you're
on CF 8. You can now call the Admin API method, clearTrustedCache, and pass
i
Mark, my understanding is that that "watch config files" option is just for
Websphere, and specifically Webshpere Network Deployment. Is that what
you'ree running on?
/charlie
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mark Ireland
Sent: Thursday, June 2
Or do you mean your phone number? I see that showing up on the "from" field
for you, Randy. :-)
Anyway, I do believe this is controlled on the google groups page, whose URL
is always offered at the bottom of each message:
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
If you are logged in there
Steve, I'm just curious: did you notice in his last sentence there that he's
using Eudora? I see (from the mail headers) that you're using Outlook. I
just wonder if you guys may see something different based on that.
Indeed, I've wondered about that since reading Randy's original note, but I
don'
Carl, are you still having the outofmemory problem first reported on Monday?
If so, I want to offer some thoughts. First I want to follow up on one of
Mark's points, which was what I would have proposed. It's an easily missed
issue. He asked "How many instances of CF are you starting up when you
Thanks. That's interesting, though. You seem to have determined that it's
the AV program running that's a problem, but you say that there's "plenty of
free memory available". For we who do such troubleshooting for a living, I
really look forward to hearing more if/when you can report.
For instanc
That's just so odd, then, that CF can't start for lack of memory, when there
is clearly (from your report) plenty of real (and therefore also virtual)
memory, and further you're not even specifying an XMS value.
I'll be curious if you ever learn how the bug in the AV program could
somehow have b
Good news, Sanjeev: that's all available in the IIS web server request logs.
Just right-click on a web site in the IIS admin, and choose properties. The
first pane shown has "enable logging" as an option, with another
"properties" button to help you locate the logs, and control what's recorded
i
AJ, one suggestion is to enable and observe info in the two views, “problems”
and (far less obvious) “progress”.
These are available via Window>Show View. The first (“problems”) is listed
right on that first menu, but both of them are also under the Window>Show
View>Other pane under the Gene
For still more such tools that can help, Steve, I have two related
categories of my CF411.com list:
Page Testing Tools: http://www.cf411.com/#pagetest
HTTP Debugging Proxies :http://www.cf411.com/#proxy
I'll note that I do point to the tools mentioned so far, and many more. Ho
Besides those offered so far, I have still more options for you in a
category of my CF411 site:
Web Site Design Repositories
http://www.cf411.com/#sitedesign
The site has over 100 categories and over 1000 links to resources and tools
of interest to CFers. Anytime you might ask, "does anyone know
Beyond the other excellent suggestions so far, a simpler thing is also to
check if somehow their sessionid is changing on each request, which would
explain why sessions created on one request for the user would not be the
same on the next request.
You can track for each request (cflog, cftrace, w
Scott, as far as I can tell, nothing has changed in the CF Enterprise Server
Monitor from 8 to 9. Both it, and FusionReactor, and SeeFusion can all
attempt to kill requests.
Just beware: such an attempt is only that, an "attempt". There's no
guarantee it can be interrupted. If a CF request is in
Great thread. I'll offer confirmation of a couple of points and share a few
more to help with solving CF server problems like Andrew's.
First, I'll +1 Kai's observation that FR shouldn't cause any noticeable
overhead. Beyond the Intergral folks' own declarations that it's low
overhead, I can confi
On the matter of FR's CP, let's clarify that there are two uses of the CP
feature.
The first is just to notify you when conditions exceed the limits you
mention (like "a request taking more than x seconds", "more than x requests
running at once", "less than x% memory available"). If you just have
I hate to seem like the FR apologist here (though note my last two notes
included info for people using other tools as well), but I do want to step
in with another clarification about Matthew's comment here.
It would not be possible for FR's general logging features to fill the disk.
It has built-
In addition to Barry's helpful comments, I'll note something important about
FusionReactor's memory graph, as contrasted to SeeFusion or that of the CF
Server Monitor. As you clarified, Andrew, what you're referring to is the
heap amount allocated and used. That is not the max amount. Fortunately,
Andrew, does that "fair bit of nested cflooping" show a CFQUERY buried
within that loop? Where it's taking data from the one query and using it to
do another? If so, that's a classic case where perhaps a join would solve
the problem. CFML developers often fall into a trap of having CF do work
that
Yes, Barry. That's what I was referring to late last week:
"On the matter of FR's CP, let's clarify that there are two uses of the CP
feature. The first is just to notify you when conditions exceed the limits
you mention (like "a request taking more than x seconds", "more than x
requests running a
Andrew, in addition to the other helpful replies to your question offered so
far, I'll add a bit of a contrarian perspective: I don't know that there's
generally much value in worrying about when/how garbage collection is
happening. I'll even say further that some focus too much on tweaking GC
algo
I agree with your last point, Kai. Good one.
As for your contention about some shops being unable to dig into their code
to deal with what may be many problems, I understand that too. But when I
suggest that other things are often the root cause, I do mean to say that in
nearly all my experiences
Barry, to be clear, just upgrading to CF8 won't get you the CF Server
Monitor--you do need to be using the Enterprise (or Developer) edition.
As for how they compare, no one has done a close analysis (that I know of).
I will say that I use both, every day, often on the same server (both my own
and
OK Steve, there are really multiples issues there: can you determine what
memory is used per request, and whether you can install FR and SF together.
Let me take the last first: that's easy. The other deserves more discussion
(for those interested) and I'll offer it in another note.
First, as for
Following up my last note, as for determining memory used per request, I
would say there is more to that question than just the simple one asked.
Besides addressing if FR/SF can do it, I would also ask if it's really what
is needed most times.
FR/SF cannot track memory per request:
---
It's always hard (and risky) to infer too much from any such analysis (not
knowing more about the sample audience), Mark, but I will say with respect
to your concluding question that by far most CFers are likely NOT running on
CF 9. I'd think many are on 8, but perhaps even most are still on someth
Claude, is this using cfdocument? If so, before exploring too many
alternatives and causes, have you tried simply using the new localurl
attribute that was added in CF8? Many missed it, and it's been a great book
for the performance and reliability of this tag.
The switch should be used if all th
Kai's reply makes me want to cue the music to Dylan's song (covered by
many), "The answer my friend, is blowin' in the logs [wind]. The answer is
blowin' in the logs." Or maybe that's too old for many to get it. :-)
Yes, it could be that it's a systemic problem (outofmemory errors, jvm
issues, etc
1 - 100 of 660 matches
Mail list logo