Re: [c-nsp] asr9k forwarding between pw's in a bridge-domain

/asr9k_r4.2/ lxvpn/configuration/guide/lesc42p2mps.html#wp1247198 To have split horizon so that traffic from one pw is not forwarded to the other you would need to configure a vfi and put both pw under the VFI. You can also configure split horizon groups. Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco

[c-nsp] 6vpe - me3600x

router bgp 64512 address-family ipv4 vrf one redistribute connected maximum-paths ibgp unequal-cost 3 do wr Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] 6vpe - me3600x

192.168.254.136 ip helper-address 192.168.254.136 does global mean global vrf? If so, that's NOT where that dhcp server lives...so I would seem that I wouldn't want that there. Aaron noc-3600(config)#vrf ? definition VRF definition mode selectionselection criteria upgrade-cli upgrade cli

Re: [c-nsp] 6vpe - me3600x

Yep, works and no pings dropped when I ran it Thanks Peter Aaron -Original Message- From: Peter Rathlev [mailto:pe...@rathlev.dk] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:23 PM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6vpe - me3600x On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 15:03

Re: [c-nsp] 6vpe - me3600x

. Are you sure ? [yes]: Number of VRFs downgraded: 1 noc-3600(config)# Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:48 PM To: 'Peter Rathlev' Cc: cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] warning... ASR901 running 15.1(2)SNH

later, then mpls ldp, then pw's that sit on top .. I'm running 15.2(2)SNG over the weekend to see if it all hangs in there.but as it is now, it looks to be fixed. Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] Giants and input errors but no MTU mismatch 7600-to-4948

Would double tagging (qnq) sitting atop g3/3 (service instances or svi's) cause this? Or mpls-enabled svi's sitting on top of g3/3 perhaps ? (brainstorming as I'm not sure what to make of it) Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 SUP720-3B PBR

.shtml *** Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of harbor235 Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 11:57 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 SUP720-3B PBR

. ** Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of harbor235 Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 11:57 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] vpls - 3 sites - me3600 and 2 asr9k

Everything seems to be ok. The ce's are all 3750's. One thing though, is there a reason why ce 3750 which is off of pe1 (me3600) sees itself as a cdp neighbor ? All 3750's see the other 2 remote 3750's as cdp neighbors, except for ce off of me3600 ALSO see itself. Aaron PE1

Re: [c-nsp] having a one-way vlan 1 stp issue....

direction ...that's the only problem I'm seeing. Aaron (topology) CE2 (3750) g1/0/1 trunk all---g0/23 (me3600)---mpls-(asr9k)g0/0/0/9/.116- trunk all g1/0/1 (3750) CE1 (configs) -- - CE2 -- ce2-realnoc#sh run in g1/0/1 interface

Re: [c-nsp] having a one-way vlan 1 stp issue....resolved....bug in 3750 ce1 ios, ugh

...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:36 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] having a one-way vlan 1 stp issue Any idea why I can only see spanning tree for vlan 1 in *one direction* ? all other vlan's stp work fine. AND if I flip the stp

[c-nsp] having a one-way vlan 1 stp issue....

ce2 can't see ce1's stp config bpdu's. vtp and cdp are working however. ce2 and ce1 are connected via a mpls l2vpn (vpws)via me3600x and asr9k. -- ce1 -- ce1-top-crml#sh

Re: [c-nsp] having a one-way vlan 1 stp issue....

I *can* ping and telnet from ce2 to ce1 over vlan 1...stp just not working. Appreciate any assistance Aaron ce2-realnocsh ip int br vl 1 Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Vlan1 1.1.1.2 YES manual upup ce2-realnoc ce2

Re: [c-nsp] policer in case of burstable IP transit service

looking for but thought I'd share. Aaron 901#sh run in g0/5 | in policy service-policy input pm 901#sh policy-map Policy Map pm Class class-default police cir 7500 bc 2343750 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop 901#sh policy-map int g0/5 GigabitEthernet0/5

[c-nsp] catv network - qpsk - atm25

atm 25 int is rj45 with probably a atm compliant underlying signaling, etc) If I went via atm25 router into my mpls cloud I could l2/l3vpn that into my video headend and probably be done with it. Lemme know your thoughts plz Aaron ___ cisco

Re: [c-nsp] catv network - qpsk - atm25

Nm-1atm-25 has been eol/eos since 2006, my boss totally doesn't like the idea of rolling out ~40 node locations with atm25 backhual with eos/eol gear! This may have answered it for me J I'll still hear from any suggestions yall have though, just incase we do it. Aaron From: Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] l2tpv3

Also, can I have a mesh of tunnels between (3) different endpoints, so 3 different cisco 800's with (2) tunnels per 800 to the other (2) 800's, such that (3) lan switches hanging off the lan side of the 800's appear to be all 3 meshed together AND PASS STP/CDP/VTP, etc ? Aaron -Original

[c-nsp] asr901 - vlan-based eompls (l2vpn) supported ?

does vlan-based eompls l2vpn work on asr901 ? ...in 15.1(2)SNH ? i can't get it to work using the following config...am i doing something wrong ? 901#sh ver | in IOS Cisco IOS Software, 901 Software (ASR901-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(2)SNH, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) 901#conf t Enter

[c-nsp] traceroute shows mpls labels...how?

Do you all know how this works? How is traceroute able to report back the mpls label that is in use in the transit hops? Also wondering why I don't see this on windows command line tracert Aaron RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k#trace vrf one 1.2.3.4 source 2.4.6.8 1 19.1911.5 [MPLS: Labels

Re: [c-nsp] traceroute shows mpls labels...how?

packets and see where exactly is that label information embedded/carried in the ttl expired in transit packets. see what I'm asking ? Aaron -Original Message- From: Roger Wiklund [mailto:roger.wikl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:49 PM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] traceroute shows mpls labels...how?

that mpls label info BUT the tracert windows application just isn't smart enough to render it on the cli output.. I would think that wireshark on windows would tell me if it is or isn't seeing those extensions with the label info Aaron From: Chris Evans [mailto:chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com

Re: [c-nsp] traceroute shows mpls labels...how?

Chris/Phil, thanks a lot Aaron From: Phil Bedard [mailto:phil...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:29 PM To: Chris Evans Cc: lt,cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netgt,; Aaron Subject: Re: [c-nsp] traceroute shows mpls labels...how? Just the probe packets differ in protocol

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 svi's not showing in and out bit counts that i see on corresponding phy int

Xu, you didn't see the grep'd output ? :) see below.i was piping to include only 30 sec Aaron -Original Message- From: Xu Hu [mailto:jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:21 AM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600 svi's

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 svi's not showing in and out bit counts that i see on corresponding phy int

Thanks Reuben. By efp's, I take it you mean the command structure for Ethernet service instance, bride domain, etc. right ? Aaron -Original Message- From: Reuben Farrelly [mailto:reuben-cisco-...@reub.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:51 PM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] me3600 svi's not showing in and out bit counts that i see on corresponding phy int

anybody know why me3600 svi doesn't seem to show in and out bit counts that the underlying phy int shows? all svi's (10,11,13) are in a vrf running over mpls l3vpn 3600#sh int vl 10 | in 30 sec 30 second input rate 2000 bits/sec, 3 packets/sec 30 second output rate 1000 bits/sec, 3

Re: [c-nsp] 6VPE deployment Issue (Core router need configure IPv6 address or not?)

. This community is so knowledgeable that I will look for others to confirm or deny my understandings and then grow from it. Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Xu Hu Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 10:30 AM

Re: [c-nsp] Point to Point T1's and vlan nightmares

-loader_release_ledfix 100] 3600#sh vtp ? % Unrecognized command Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Oliver Garraux Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 4:38 PM To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

[c-nsp] how can i use all 3 of these routes for load sharring?

Unicast, Table Id: 0xe000 Route metric is 1 No advertising protos. Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] acl on bvi in ios xr (9k) 4.1.2

and I don't recall them working. Am I the only one that thinks it's strange to add layer 3 packet filter acl's to a layer 2 transport/bridging interface? Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of tim Sent

[c-nsp] vpnv4 nlri in bgp but not marked as best in order to get into rib

internet they were sent to bit bucket for 1.2.3.0/24 and customer was having no connectivity. I simply removed import from vrf one and readded it and BAM, bgp marked as best and installed into rib and customer could surf. Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] acl on bvi in ios xr (9k) 4.1.2

. Ugh. Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Kleefass Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 8:59 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] acl on bvi in ios xr (9k) 4.1.2 Hi Aaron, On 23.07.2012 3:16

Re: [c-nsp] vpnv4 nlri in bgp but not marked as best in order to get into rib

was then happy, but now the mystery as to why. Aaron -Original Message- From: adam vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 9:12 AM To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] vpnv4 nlri in bgp but not marked as best in order to get into rib

Re: [c-nsp] vpnv4 nlri in bgp but not marked as best in order to get into rib

to 4.2.1 one of these days but that scares me. Aaron From: Fredrik Vöcks [mailto:fredrik.vo...@bredband2.se] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 11:46 AM To: Aaron Subject: Re: [c-nsp] vpnv4 nlri in bgp but not marked as best in order to get into rib Hi, What platform are you talking

Re: [c-nsp] vpnv4 nlri in bgp but not marked as best in order to get into rib

Thanks a bunch Fredrik. Did TAC tell you this is being worked and filed as a bug? If so, what is the bug CSC number? Aaron From: Fredrik Vöcks [mailto:fredrik.vo...@bredband2.se] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 12:09 PM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] vpnv4 nlri

Re: [c-nsp] m-vpn

As a follow-up, since I don't recall mentioning thisduring my effort with cisco to make mvpn work in my network, we saw that multicast wouldn't flow over a bvi interface when using mvpn. Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] acl on bvi in ios xr (9k) 4.1.2

, that being the bvi. But I don't see the command ipv4 access-list under the bvi. What am I missing here ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] acl on bvi in ios xr (9k) 4.1.2

) So I'm confused with that list of bvi limitations within the 4.2.x config doc. Aaron -Original Message- From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [mailto:ach...@forthnetgroup.gr] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:18 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: chip; Aaron Subject: Re: [c-nsp] acl on bvi

Re: [c-nsp] acl on bvi in ios xr (9k) 4.1.2

Thanks Chip Yeah, with some of this newer gear and software, it seems like Cisco is still learning about Cisco :) Aaron -Original Message- From: chip [mailto:chip.g...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:56 PM To: Aaron Cc: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] acl on bvi in ios xr (9k) 4.1.2

Do you work for cisco? ...own stock? :) Aaron -Original Message- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:55 PM To: Aaron Cc: 'chip'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] acl on bvi in ios xr (9k) 4.1.2 I'm still unclear why so many

Re: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe

...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:26 AM To: Aaron; 'Pshem Kowalczyk' Subject: RE: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe Actual date is July 30th. Regards, Waris -Original Message- From: Aaron [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:42 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris); 'Pshem

Re: [c-nsp] asr9k - 4.1.2 - SH ROUTE isn't responding !!

seconds messagesetc. turns out this was a bug and SMU disk0:asr9k-p-4.1.2.CSCtx74305-1.0.0 seemed to fix it. Aaron -Original Message- From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:ja...@lixfeld.ca] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 7:24 PM To: Aaron Subject: Re: [c-nsp] asr9k - 4.1.2 - SH ROUTE isn't

[c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe

wondering if I don't have to do anything on the rr's. lemme know I have some me3600's running 12.x and some running 15.x Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe

Thanks a bunch, good info. I'll keep looking for 15.2(4)S Aaron -Original Message- From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:40 PM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe Hi, On 18 July 2012 09:20, Aaron aar

[c-nsp] asr9k - 4.1.2 - SH ROUTE isn't responding !!

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k#sh route Wed Jul 11 16:27:27.719 CDT Just hangs!! Any ideas ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] asr9k - 4.1.2 - SH ROUTE isn't responding !!

' (jid 1113, node 0/RSP0/CPU0) within the timeout period (100 seconds) Cisco tac said do this during maint window... (admin) process restart 1113 loc 0/rsp0/cpu0 Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf

[c-nsp] bgp as pe ce

When I advertise 1.3.9.0/24 to my ISP they are seeing the as-path as.. 345 64512 How do I get rid of 64512 so it's not sent as part of the as-path ? My intentions were to use 64512 as my internal As that I use to run bgp between all my pe's for my internal mpls l3vpn's... router bgp

Re: [c-nsp] bgp as pe ce

Charlie and Cisco NSP group, y'all are awesome! local-as 16527 no-prepend replace-as (ios xr) bam! Thanks man Aaron p.s. my only hope is to help y'all somehow someway in the future as much and as fast as y'all have helped me these last few months. P.s.s - detailsi had to get pe-ce bgp

Re: [c-nsp] Basic understanding of 6PE and 6VPE

to do dual stack on my pe-ce connection Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of adam vitkovsky Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 8:14 AM To: mark.ti...@seacom.mu; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Basic

Re: [c-nsp] Basic understanding of 6PE and 6VPE

] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 3:18 PM To: 'adam vitkovsky'; mark.ti...@seacom.mu; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Basic understanding of 6PE and 6VPE router bgp 64512 vrf one address-family ipv6 unicast !!% 'BGP' detected the 'warning' condition 'The parent address

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9001 IOS-XR, no image

open a bug for FTP support. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Vinny Abello wrote: I recently just received a few ASR-9001 routers and was surprised to find they did not come with the required IOS-XR 4.2.1 image at all

Re: [c-nsp] single static ip address for customer(s)

on doingmpls l2vpn, etc. Thanks Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:41 AM To: Andrew Jones Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] single static ip

Re: [c-nsp] single static ip address for customer(s)

the endpoints huh ? could you explain high level how to do.would cisco router handle the pppoe at the hub? Can I do this redundantly in hub, like dual hub/spoke? Aaron -Original Message- From: Ross Halliday [mailto:ross.halli...@wtccommunications.ca] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 3:04

[c-nsp] single static ip address for customer(s)

. Is there some cpe devices or methods by which SP's deal with this ? This can't be a new challenge? (I've only worked in the ISP realm for 4 years, so it's fairly new to me, but I know in these 4 years it's always a point of frustration) Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] ospf with vrf

for the right side. Would I need 2 vl's ? one to get area 2 connected via area 3 to native area0and another vl to get native area 0 connected to sbb ? Aaron -Original Message- From: adam vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:58 AM To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] gns3 - router/switch types supported

if IOS XR will be supported in GNS3 anytime soon? Like asr9000 running ios xr? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ospf with vrf

Secondary Domain-ID cr R2(config-router)#domain-id 0.0.0.1 R2(config-router)# Yep, I just changed pe1's ospf proc ID to a random number I picked678. Then saw again, E2 in Ce2 rib. I changed pe2's ospf domain-id to 0.0.2.166 and BANG, IA's in ce2 rib. Nice, thanks adam. Aaron

[c-nsp] ospf with vrf

IA routes. They are still in the ospf db though, but just not being added to the RIB. Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] ospf with vrf

something to do with loop prevention and pe checks of domain id and down bit or something like that to keep pe from adding anything other than type 1 and 2's to rib. Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent

[c-nsp] MPLS L2VPN issues I'm seeing

and envisioned that L2VPN being hauled back to my pe's at the hub site and 1q trunk them back into my legacy network's 7609's where they will be bridged into that pre-existing vlan 312. So that's the idea. Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] ip helper within L3VPN

Message- From: Aaron [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:24 PM To: 'Janez Novak' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ip helper within L3VPN Janez, you are awesome! That did it. I tried with only dhcp relay profile and didn't work, then I also added back

[c-nsp] ip helper within L3VPN

be ipv4 helper 1.1.1.1 vrf one 192.168.100.1 ? Also, is there something else I need to do to make this work? I'm seeing NO packets at the dhcp server at all. Pings from vrf asr interface to dhcp server work fine Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] ip helper within L3VPN

Janez, you are awesome! That did it. I tried with only dhcp relay profile and didn't work, then I also added back the interface level ip helper vrf one (not vrf default, like it defaulted to originally) and BANG! Thanks again. Huge Help Janez Aaron conf dhcp ipv4 profile test relay

[c-nsp] ASR901 PTP (Precision Time Prot) IEEE 1588

Anybody know anything about this ? I have dual third-party ptp servers . Symmetricomm. I wanted me ASR901 to synch with the Symetricomm PTP server(s). Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] Apply C-VID and S-VID to untagged packet

Maybe like this. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k(config)#int GigabitEthernet0/0/0/9.15 l2transport RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k(config-subif)#encapsulation untagged RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k(config-subif)#rewrite ? ingress Set the tag rewriting policy for this EFP RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k(config-subif)#rewrite ingress ? tag Set

Re: [c-nsp] Apply C-VID and S-VID to untagged packet

) in the input direction Aaron --- Maybe like this. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k(config)#int GigabitEthernet0/0/0/9.15 l2transport RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k(config-subif)#encapsulation untagged RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k(config-subif)#rewrite ? ingress Set the tag rewriting policy

[c-nsp] m-vpn

different pe/ce will rcv. I'd prefer to use ssm cause I don't wanna mess with rp's and sup-optimal routing to and from rp and single point of failure on rp (so I don't wanna mess with redundant rp either if I can simply do ssm) Aaron ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] m-vpn

Thanks Arie, I'm trying to accomplish in ios xr 4.1.2 - got link for that ? -Original Message- From: Arie Vayner (avayner) [mailto:avay...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 10:15 AM To: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] m-vpn Aaron, The MDT BGP address family

Re: [c-nsp] m-vpn

:11 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] m-vpn On 29/05/12 15:55, Aaron wrote: Hi all, I've read through Chapter 7 of MPLS and VPN Architectures Volume II regarding Multicast VPN. I never saw any mention of enabling the ipv4 mdt address family under bgp. Is this ipv4 mdt

Re: [c-nsp] Monitoring 6K performance (pps)

What do you mean you don't see any useful result? I am monitoring the data you see in your show command via SNMP and graphing this in Cacti. Cheers, Aaron. From: jstuxuhu0816 [mailto:jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 14 May 2012 7:18 PM To: Aaron Riemer; 'Kyle Duren' Cc: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Monitoring 6K performance (pps)

Ryan, That is very cool! At the moment I am monitoring the fabric channels via SNMP for each blade but that is a very cool command :) Cheers, Aaron. -Original Message- From: Ryan West [mailto:rw...@zyedge.com] Sent: Monday, 14 May 2012 9:11 PM To: Aaron Riemer; cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 回复: RE: Monitoring 6K performance (pps)

sense. At the moment it looks like I can't justify going to SUP2T :D Thanks for all the valued input guys. Cheers, Aaron. From: jstuxuhu0816 [mailto:jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 15 May 2012 9:41 AM To: Mack McBride; Aaron Riemer; 'Kyle Duren' Cc: cisco-nsp; 许, 虎 Subject: 回复: RE: [c

[c-nsp] Monitoring 6K performance (pps)

) that are actually processed by the switch. Obviously bits / sec are not the same as packets / sec. Is there any real way to go about this other than monitoring each interface and calculating a total for a given time period? Ideas? Cheers, Aaron

[c-nsp] Monitoring Switch Fabric utilisation (VSS)

-SWITCH-MIB but this looks to me more for monitoring the VSS status. Any SNMP / monitoring guru's able to help with this one? Cheers, Aaron. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Monitoring 6K performance (pps)

not traversing the switch fabric). Please see my other post. Any comments welcome :) Cheers, Aaron. From: Kyle Duren [mailto:pixitha.k...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 13 May 2012 3:12 PM To: Aaron Riemer Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Monitoring 6K performance (pps) You

Re: [c-nsp] Line Protocol going down

Could be a bad port too. Try a new cable first, then try a new port. Start with the side that is seeing the errors. Aaron On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: I have a 2821(15.1(3)T2) connected to a 3560(12.2(55)SE3) and recently i have had the Line protocol

[c-nsp] multicast within a mpls vpn (ios xr , asr9000)

within the customer vrf. Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:43 PM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] lsd Aaron wrote: Is there something similar in IOS to lsd (label switch db) found in IOS XR ? does this function of lsd exist in ios? (lsd seems like what I used to understand as lib/tib

Re: [c-nsp] lsd

writes: Gee and I thought LSD was for the operator and not a feature. Nice, no reason the gear shouldn't share in the fun. :) On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 09:44 -0500, Aaron wrote: Is there something similar in IOS to lsd (label switch db

Re: [c-nsp] default-information IPv6 IOS-XR

In my case of ipv4 and vpnv4 I had to add default-info orig within vrf under bgp in order for my vpnv4 neighbors to learn default route. Under bgp vrf one rd 10.101.0.1:1 default-information originate address-family ipv4 unicast redistribute ospf 1 -Original Message- From:

[c-nsp] lsd

to it like in xr below. ? Aaron RP/0/RSP0/CPU0: 9k#sh mpls lsd applications Wed Apr 25 08:39:17.792 CST Application StateRecoveryTimeLocation --- LSD Active 0/0 (0) 0

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 basic configuration problem

to know their identity after 3 months has gone byin other words, a subpoena comes in and Homeland security (ICE I believe they are called) or some FBI agent wants to know who had a certain IP address 3 months agowill SLAAC in IPv6 have a historical log for me to look at ? Aaron

[c-nsp] mpls vpws (p-to-p pw) mtu understanding

Folks, please see my notes, .yesterday I tested veex-injected traffic frame rate of 9191 (won't work) then 9190 worked. See the following settings I had in my network when 9190 worked. Please help me understand what you think the 16 bytes might be regarding the observed frame rate from VeEX

[c-nsp] L3VPN traceroute from ce---vpn cloud----ce

What's the deal with the traceroute from CE (cisco device) via mpls l3vpn showing some strange AS number ? AS 65111 ? ...tracing from ce... so it's ce---pe---p---p---pece Ce-router#traceroute 10.101.18.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.101.18.2 1 1.2.3.17 0

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN traceroute from ce---vpn cloud----ce

this strange AS number would show up like this. Aaron -Original Message- From: vinny_abe...@dell.com [mailto:vinny_abe...@dell.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:49 PM To: aar...@gvtc.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] L3VPN traceroute from ce---vpn cloudce In my experience

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN traceroute from ce---vpn cloud----ce

how it used that bgp entry to match those 10dot ip hops as coming from that AS in it local bgp table. Ce-router#sh ip bgp | in 65333 r 10.0.0.0 192.168.1.10 65002 65001 65003 65333 i Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route

core hubs, but now I'm wanting to allow BOTH default routes into the rib to allow for the typical cef src/dst hashing for load balancing between both pe next hops 10.101.0.1 and 10.101.0.2. Let me know what you think please on how to accomplish this. Aaron test-me3600#sh bgp vpnv4 u rd 10.101.0.1

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route

MPLS Flags: MPLS Required me3600(config-router-af)# -Original Message- From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdur...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:58 AM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route You will need a unique RD per

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route

MPLS Flags: MPLS Required Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] converting mp-ibgp full mesh to dual redundant route reflectors

any ipv4 native between my pe's) router bgp 65000 bgp cluster-id 1 commit (of course also I specified on the two hub pe's that all my neighbors are route-reflector-client) Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route

To: Aaron Cc: Peter Rathlev; Cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route What version of XR is running on those 9ks? If it's 4.2.0, you might be hitting the SVD 'feature'. 'show svd role' http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.2/routing

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route

pe's just fine even without matching internal external 1 2 when I redis ospf 1 as below, any ideas) thanks again Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Luis Anzola Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:44 AM

Re: [c-nsp] L3VPN works, but not default route

Do I need default info-orig in this configuration within the pe's in order for this to work? I think it's the default info-orig in the original ce that causes the 0/0 route to show up at the first pe, do I need default info-orig in the pe somewhere to make this 0/0 route make it across the

Re: [c-nsp] ip synchronisation

to start reading it in and where frame begins and ends. I believe Ethernet is considered to be asynchronous with its preamble/sfd telling the rcvr when to start reading in the frame and to stop reading that frame... Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] extending asr9k mpls cloud into my 7609's

may have moved a bunch of stuff physically off of the 7609 and onto that colo'd 9k, which would make it moot Aaron -Original Message- From: Phil Bedard [mailto:phil...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:14 PM To: Aaron; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] extending

Re: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 in a VRF on a 7600

to understand if any of y'all understand cisco's projected life of the 7600 in light of the new ASR9000) (I'm drawing lines between these 2 boxes since I have (2) 7600's acting as the core of my network and we just bought (12) 9k's and (10) 901's Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF's handling of secondary IP addresses on subinterfaces

strange/weird bug or something you were experiencing I had the same issue a while back where I had the ospf network statements covering the networks defined as secondaries, BUT if the primary ip address wasn't covered as a network statement as well, NONE of my secondaries were advertised. Aaron

[c-nsp] extending asr9k mpls cloud into my 7609's

into a vrf on the 7609) will I be able to plumb/internetwork connectivity from the switching plane/vlans of the 7609 into the newly extended mpls/LxVPN logic of that 7609? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] real world experience - ASR901 / ASR903

see is the only other version available on cisco's web site). 15.1(2)SNH Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Fibre link flapping

How about using a light meter? It is possible that the connectors maybe poor, the light on the tx interface could be marginal, etc On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 17:43, Nat Morris n...@nuqe.net wrote: On 16 February 2012 22:08, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote: There are plenty of good protocols

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >