I've use the san disk version with no problems
On 7/6/07, Shawn Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In our lab we're using off-the-shelf Micro Center-branded 1GB CF cards and
CF/PCMCIA adapters without a problem in both a 12k with a PRP2 and
7206VXRs
with NPE300/400.
On 7/6/07, Peter Kranz
If you are using to dial out then AUX, but if you want to use it as a backup
for OOB then I would use the console. That will enable you to see any
messages appearing during boot up.
Aaron
On 8/21/07, Conaway, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give these a shot.
Cable guide:
http
Check the amt of memory on the card. Is it what you expected? Are you taking
full routes?
Aaron
On 9/4/07, John van Oppen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am assuming you mean the interface on the line card is shutdown. If
so, that is the normal behavior as dCEF is still enabled on a card
Of course, having all the clocks synchronized really makes knowing what
happened when easier from logs.
Aaron
On 9/12/07, Michael K. Smith - Adhost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Kim:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Unless there are features you need in 12.4, use 12.0. And make sure all your
cards are vips to get the benifits of dcef.
12.0(32)SY is pretty good.
Aaron
On 9/21/07, Masood Ahmad Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rule of thumb ...keep new updates..
Latest is 12.4 (16) for 7507...
Regards
12.0S is mature and is in use by a lot of tier 1s.
12.0(32)S is very recent.
On 9/21/07, Gert Doering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 01:39:45AM +0500, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
It's just not new features. New release contains new features and bug
fixes
from an older
Supply router and card types.
On 9/27/07, Aladi Saputra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
i have a network like this :
ISP Metro Ethernet link
Cisco Router A = Catalyst 2900 = Catalyst
== Cisco Router B
Condition :
1. ISP Link is
They do have a DPT but you wont get OC12 on it. The 7200 just can't do that
much. The card will allow and OC12 through it.
Aaron
On 10/25/07, Hyunseog Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't think Cisco has POS OC12 card for 72xx series.
Though
What does the show controller pos show?
Aaron
On 10/29/07, Tim Murfy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are experiencing a strange issues with our new 7304 and a new OC-12
circuit. When we bring the circuit up with a full BGP table, we see
ignored
errors on the POS interface every few seconds
I'd go with vip4. Did you mean vip4-80? I the extra memory and cpu will be
needed.
Aaron
On 10/30/07, neal rauhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a customer who is going to provide peering links from a 7507 to
two
different customers. They're going to take full routes and we're expecting
most of their
time closer to the 25mbit each range.
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Aaron wrote:
I'd go with vip4. Did you mean vip4-80? I the extra memory and cpu will
be
needed.
Aaron
On 10/30/07, neal rauhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a customer who is going to provide peering
That looks like a bug with POS in the 12.2 code. NSE just means that the
payload has moved in the sonet frame as per design.
Aaron
On 11/2/07, Tim Murfy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we are now able to reproduce the errors. Everytime we write mem, we
can cause those input errors to occur
For SSO they should be the same cards with same memory.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide09186a00801b3a9b.html
Aaron
On Oct 31, 2007 1:01 PM, eliran h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I'm configuring NSF with SSO in a 12000 platform with different
I use tftpd32 for windows platforms and freebsd or sol9.
Aaron
On Nov 6, 2007 4:27 AM, Ian Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That matches my Solaris experience exactly.
I can confirm RFC2348 support in 12.2SR and 12.4/12.4T (ie c3845) as well.
Ian
Clinton Work wrote:
Solaris 8 doesn't
Solaris 8 patch for TFTP #108964-04 has fixed the 16MB limitation
On Nov 6, 2007 4:07 PM, Dale Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 6, 2007 9:52 AM, Clinton Work [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to determine when blksize / rfc 2348 support was added to
several Cisco IOS releases.
If you are peering with loopbacks (ebgp) you need to do multihop and
configure static routes on pointing to the loopbacks
Aaron
On Nov 15, 2007 12:38 PM, omar parihuana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
mmmh maybe I'm wrong but the BGP session between CE-PE only can be eBGP and
is necessary one
disabling path-mtu-discovery (this is a wild shot in the dark).
Has anyone else successfully established BGP over PPPoEoA before?
Yes, and it (still) works. As Aaron and Peter already mentioned you should
use ebgp-multihop on both systems. Our config looks like this:
CE config
Of course you didn't specify ATM originally either. POS would probably
give you a few more since you don't have the ATM overhead.
On Nov 17, 2007 3:09 PM, Garry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stewart wrote:
A few people hit me offline stating that it's not nice to hold back the
answers and
4.5 years is low?!?
On Nov 20, 2007 5:57 PM, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a good reference or way of locating the MTBF for
assorted Cisco products? We're currently looking for the MTBF for a
7206VXR w/ the G2. I found a reference to the uBR7246VXR and 41,000
hours
Why are you using TFTP? You should be doing FTP or SCP now.
Maybe you meant CLI.
On Nov 30, 2007 8:10 PM, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6441/products_data_sheet0900aecd806d1fd6.html
When downloading from Cisco,
be connected to via
tcp, the less I'll have to worry about the aforementioned.
Is making the cisco transparent with frame a possibility? Anyone?
Also, I'm still not sure what hardware I should be looking at. Will a
cisco 1600 suffice? does it matter if it's a 1601, 1602, 1604?
Thanks again.
Aaron
If I am not mistaken, Smartnet comes by with the equipment but I'm not sure
for how long.
On Nov 30, 2007 11:22 AM, Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
For a $20K device you better damn well understand it IS low.
Name me one single automaker
I believe it is included for 90 days with the purchase. If you want longer
then you pay more.
Aaron
On Dec 3, 2007 1:54 PM, Will Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
(nor, in fact, for the additional money that they have to spend
on smartnet, as under this scheme
Bruce Pinsky wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron wrote:
Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote:
Dear Aaron
regarding the bridging frame directly to your internal router via your
firewall , the below Cisco documents shows transparent bridging over
many scenarios
Yeah. I meant Clock s line
On Dec 12, 2007 7:05 PM, Niels Bakker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron) [Wed 12 Dec 2007, 16:57 CET]:
You should try clock s internal first if you have SDH gear in the middle.
Um, no. Exactly the opposite. Please read what I actually wrote
Mohamed,
As many have already said, you lose the ability to see some info from your
peer. If you only have 1 upstream then it is worth the memory it takes.
Removing will free up memory since that looks like where your concern lies.
I would try to upgrade your memory if possible.
Aaron
On Dec 18
I would recheck the configuration of the port since you typically need to
explicitly enable ISIS on the interface.
Aaron
On Jan 18, 2008 9:49 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Agree with Rubens. If you absolutely need to run IS-IS on a Vlan where
you also have hosts which
I'd look at assigning /31s instead. Most recent version of code support it
now.
On Jan 25, 2008 11:37 AM, Matthew Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explain the difference between these two switches? Is it
only the uplink speed?
WS-C3750E-48TD-E (10 Gig Uplinks)
Once you get one and understand the cabling, then you are good.
On Jan 25, 2008 5:13 PM, Andrew Alston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just bought 4 16 slot CRS-1's. Cisco would not sell them to us without
Cisco CA involvement. But the involvement was purely on the installation
and deployment
What are the loads on the other 2 ports when this is happening?
On Jan 30, 2008 6:28 PM, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am having an issue with a 3GE-GBIC-SC card and am looking for advice
here.While 2 of the 3 ports of the card seem fine, the third port always
experiences high
Speaking of, does anyone know what happened to Blue Console? There website
won't let you order and the emails go unanswered.
Aaron
On Feb 4, 2008 10:26 AM, Doug McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:43:16AM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
Forgive me for hijacking the thread
BFD has is place with ethernet through a switch, I don't see its value in
anything else. You can have fast detection without BFD.
On Feb 8, 2008 11:13 PM, Vikas Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aaron,
If you have customer who wants redundancy for CE -PE , and switchover
should be very
Or clogged air filter which will reduce the amt of air able to be pulled in.
You should change it at least once a year, more often if there is a lot of
construction going on.
Aaron
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Pete Templin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eliran h wrote:
I've typed the command
There isn't an 2nd ed. The MPLS VPN arch book is really good too.
Aaron
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Howard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just been looking through Cisco ISP Essentials, which seems like an
interesting, if dated (2001), read. There doesn't seem to be a second
Hi Guys,
I have been doing some reading and I am interested in the topic of switch
protocol filtering. It seems this was a feature on the old Catalyst
switches. Has this functionality been removed now in IOS? I see no mention
of it anywhere.
Thanks in advance,
Aaron
Can you post show version and the show diag (looking for engine and memory
only) of the affected cards. Also what is the current utilization of the
circuits that you are seeing issues on?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there, I've seen
Provide feedback on the website. I always do.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 08 May 2008, Kevin Graham wrote:
As much as I'm disappointed to see /univercd become deprecated, the new
documentation site at least looks OK once you can find the
Hey Guys,
Is there a Cisco feature such as the feature navigator for the Cisco ASA
series appliances?
I am trying to determine the features that we are licensed for, in
particular the amount of VPN SSL connections that are allowed with our
current license.
Cheers,
Aaron
tried to grab the MIB but my MIB viewer complains that I need all the
parent MIB's. I am not interested in downloading all these MIB's.
Is there anyone with any thoughts?
Cheers,
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
If you stay within specs you should be fine. We've used SM in the lab with
no ill effects. Attenuators also don't cost much either.
Aaron
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:18 PM, les [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've combed the web with no luck to the answer of my simple question
If you use SINGLE
in this area that would be great.
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
It looks like you have the incorrect ip address on the remote site or the
tunnel xconnect pointing to the wrong interface on the local side (FE2/0
instead of FE0/0)
Aaron
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Steven Pfister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've got a project I'm trying to use an l2tpv3
on each end pointing to the remote
loopback?
Aaron
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm having an issue delivering packets in a test environment that I have.
To make it as simple as possible, I'll describe what I have with all links
Curious. Was CDP globally disabled? Don't want to make any assumptions.
Aaron
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Jared Mauch wrote:
Of course. This was opened with PSIRT (PSIRT-0642590629) on March 26 and
was discussed internally
I believe BP is to turn it off globally and turn it on per specific
interface.
I do concur that changing encap types should not reenable anything.
Aron
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 27,
Do you have static routes pointing to both loopbacks? 1 for you and on the
isp side, 1 back to you?
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Lincoln Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roy wrote:
Just to bring everybody up to date, the ISP keeps saying its something we
are doing.
did you try any of
How about putting on the outbound to make sure that you are sending it the
the hub?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nic Tjirkalli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy ho,
Maybe try to put in an ACL or could use netflow for this as well...
ip access-list extend check_packets_in
permit esp any
The large ones do. I know Sprint has been doing it for over 11 years. I
would say that most do not charge or if they do it is minimal. NOC support
may vary from provider to provider.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Mike Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has been a confusing subject for me.
l2tpv3
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Greg Schwimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a situation where I need to run MPLS across a non-MPLS network (the
Internet) to connect two of my networks together. We have looked at GRE,
but ran into issues and were later told by Cisco that running MPLS
for the 7200 with just bgp why not use 12.0S?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Gert Doering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:54:07PM -0400, Jim McBurnett wrote:
Great...
For the G1-- all we need is BGP and Ethernet-- Nothing special..
Metro E fiber inbound and
Yep weathermap looks awesome. Do you know if its possible for the map to
change the icon of a site if it is down or unreachable? That would be
awesome :)
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Koch
Sent: Saturday, September 06
Cisco. The replacement parts are cheap.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Troy Beisigl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question, but does anyone know where the filter
material can be acquired that is used on the 7500 and 12008 routers chassis?
Thanks,
-Troy
There was a kit to upgrade to 512mb which also requires a IOS upgrade. We
used it for gige and fe access in some pops.
Aaron
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Kyle Duren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an opportunity to get a Cisco 10720 router for very cheap, but I'm
rather unfamiliar
?
Thanks,
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
you also might require licensing to use transmission equipment. It has been
awhile since I dealt with this issue in AsiaPac. I remember some countries
had requirements to light fiber.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Dirk-Jan van Helmond [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
We will be using single mode
401, 501, and 601 are all based of the same engine 5. They are bw limited to
the speeds (2.5/5/10).
Aaron
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Pete Templin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps167/product_data_sheet0900aecd80465682.html
In Table 2
similar issues?
Cheers,
Aaron.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Nope.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps6267/product_data_sheet0900aecd80350c53.html
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:24 AM, tt tt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone know if the channelized SPA-1XCHSTM1/OC3 can be configured as a
full STM-1 (SDH)? We need to terminate a
What do you mean verify?
Assuming you mean verify the image was copied correctly, you can look at the
MD5 signature via the verify command.
To verify the checksum of a file on a flash memory file system or compute a
Message Digest 5 (MD5) signature for a file, use the *verify* command in
and a static route pointing to the outgoing interface
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 17:24, Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland
a...@rn.dkwrote:
If an EBGP peer is more than one hop away from the local router, you must
specify the next hop to the peer so that the two systems can establish a BGP
Sprint has a world wide network. They do not by transit from anybody.
Aaron
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:05, Stephen Kratzer kratz...@ctinetworks.comwrote:
Deleted the original post, so I'll reply to this leaf...
ATT is fine. Make sure that Sprint, at that particular location, has
multiple
.do not buy transit.
You should have been able to figure out the misspelling of by vs buy
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:24, Brian Wallingford br...@meganet.net wrote:
They don't what?
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Aaron wrote:
:Sprint has a world wide network. They do not by transit from anybody
Bad timing?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 18:03, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
OHi,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 04:54:09PM -0500, Chris Wallace wrote:
We purchased a Cisco 6509 through this program a couple years ago.
When we first got it up and running we found out it had a failed fan
It might be supported but you don't get 10GB with it.
Aaron
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 21:12, Stephen Fulton s...@lists.esoteric.ca wrote:
According to the SIP/SPA compatibility matrix:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/shared_port_adapters/install_upgrade/7600series
Nom. Capacitance @ 1 KHz:15 pF/ft. for cat 5e
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 07:31, Richard Halfpenny
richard.halfpe...@exa-networks.co.uk wrote:
Sam Stickland wrote:
Hi,
What's the maximum length of you can run async-serial (9600 baud)
over CAT5e (from a terminal server to console port).
You don't say want services you are planning on running. Full-bgp? That
would have an impact on memory requirements.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 08:09, Deric Kwok deric.kwok2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Do you know Cisco 2651XM is fine for 100M network?
If the memory is 256M, it is ok?
Can it
but are an annoyance.
Aaron
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 14:01, Pete Templin peteli...@templin.org wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
What sort of failures prompted the card switch?
Ugh. Card #1 went offline following an IOS upgrade reboot. Syslog
messages suggested memory problems. After being swapped out
Why are you configured for internal and not line clocking?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:46, james edwards
lists.james.edwa...@gmail.comwrote:
This is on the 3700 and a DS3 card. Looks like I am losing timing, which is
derived from the line.
I have searched on clock change... and have not pulled
whats the traffic flow? whats the input and the output?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:11, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
On 15-Apr-09, at 10:04 AM, Pete Templin wrote:
Jason Lixfeld wrote:
CPU doesn't seem to be running too hot:
CPU utilization for five seconds: 6%/0%; one minute:
Just monitor both ports as normal. One for each. That's what we used to do.
Aaron
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 17:25, Pete Templin peteli...@templin.org wrote:
List,
I'm in the process of bringing up my first SONET APS-protected
(single-router APS) link, and it's been an adventure. Aside from
There are several Tier 1 isps that just run Level-1 only.
Aaron
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 16:56, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net wrote:
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 03:31:00 am victor wrote:
Because of a recent change of the organizational
structure of the company I'm employed by I
nothing more than doing mpls. Actually a little less since you don't have
ldp going
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 09:55, Chris Fournier chris.fourn...@dal.ca wrote:
Does anyone use L2TPv3 over a gig link, and what is the performance
overhead introduced? I've seen some numbers at the Cisco website,
What does that have to do with L2TPv3?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:09, Ge Moua moua0...@umn.edu wrote:
I've done testing for both:
* no encryption: ~ 980Mb
* encryption ~ 240 Mb
Performance dependent on router platform (in my case 7203 w/ NSE-100)
Encryption was on 7206 w/ NPE-G1 VAM2+
If it is an OOB system and it works why not?
Aaron
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:25, Gustavo Rodrigues Ramos
gust...@nexthop.com.br wrote:
Is this suppose to be a good thing? (not patching your systems for
almost 10 years?)...
Gustavo.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Nic McCartneyn
You must be using something else besides BGP. You need static, RIP, IGRP,
EIGRP, ISIS, or OSPF to get your routes into the table. BGP cannot do it
alone.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 05:28, Robert Boyle rob...@tellurian.com wrote:
At 02:55 AM 7/3/2009, Ian Henderson wrote:
Nick 'tarantul' Novikov
No one said redistribute BGP into your IGP.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 02:19, Nick 'tarantul' Novikov taran...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Aarondudep...@gmail.com wrote:
You must be using something else besides BGP. You need static, RIP, IGRP,
EIGRP, ISIS, or OSPF to get
Looks like a fabric problem.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 14:34, Chris Lane clane1...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I have a GSR 12008 with 2 GRP-B route processors. Running
gsr-k4p-mz.120-32.S11.bin
My GRP failed over about 45 minutes ago to the backup in Slot1 from Slot0.
I keep getting this in my
Loopback interfaces do not go down, so I'm not sure what benefit you are
getting besides the ability to blackhole the 10.10.10.0/24 if the ethernet
goes down.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:09, Michael Ulitskiy mulits...@acedsl.com wrote:
Hello,
Guys, are there any drawbacks of doing the
So you don't want to use another IP for loopback. Sorry, misunderstood.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:29, Aaron dudep...@gmail.com wrote:
Loopback interfaces do not go down, so I'm not sure what benefit you are
getting besides the ability to blackhole the 10.10.10.0/24 if the ethernet
goes down
Open a tac case.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 00:55, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
I'm getting below error on GSR 12416 ALARM CARD -
IOS 12.0(32)SY6
WARNING: Unknown MBUS agent controller type, slot 24
Contact your technical support
representative.Please advise
sh
There isn't a version that you can do that.
Aaron
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 16:01, Eduard Gheorghiu edigheorg...@gmail.comwrote:
William, can you give an example of two XR versions that you can migrate
between without reloading the whole box? I would like to try it in the lab
in order to see
of in-service upgrade. However, it
looks like it just applies to SMUs. And even then, the SMUs might take
out the box.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron dudep...@gmail.com wrote:
There isn't a version that you can do that.
Aaron
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 16:01, Eduard Gheorghiu edigheorg
What is the HW on both ends? Possible one has a bug that is causing
headaches.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:51, Andy Saykao
andy.say...@staff.netspace.net.au wrote:
Hi Alex,
1/ When mpls ip is ON on both Gi4/0/1 and Gi0/2 - I can not ping from
PE2 PE1 BUT I can ping from PE1 PE2. That's my
Only if the BW or quality of the 2 networks is an issue. Asymmetrical
routing happens a lot in the internet.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:10, RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina r.tah...@moov.mg
wrote:
Hi All,
I'm connected to 2 upstreams, is there any performance issue if upload from
192.168.1.0/24
It is normal to have a CSC in standby mode. If something goes wrong with the
other CSC, it takes over.
Step 1 - Gather data before making any changes
term length 0- so you don’t have to hit enter
show log
show tech
So, what is the difference in output from doing exec-on vs attach?
You are still connecting via the same method.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 14:07, e ninja eni...@gmail.com wrote:
Antonio,
You should *never* troubleshoot fabric errors with *any* exec-on commands.
They run over the fabric that
You need 1. The second DRP would be standby if so desired.
In your example you should be able to get away with 2.
Your RPs still handle overall system management.
Aaron
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:06, My Name denac...@gmail.com wrote:
Is any one running SDR on the CRS platform? Are there any
Bad analogy since the CRS has a SIP-800.
The MSC is the routing engine. The PLIM is the physical interfaces only.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:15, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Pratap Reddy wrote:
Hi,
As per Cisco's documentation Multi Services Card should
I wouldn't expect DWDM/Trasmission gear to have that kind of impact. That
equipment doesn't have that kind of intelligence. It has to be the end
equipment.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 03:50, Alexander ecra...@hotmail.com wrote:
Tim,
I am willing to bet that DWDM/transmission eqmt in between is
The boot times are longer. The PRP-3 runs only xr and should boot faster.
There are a lot of convergence improvements (PIC being one) in XR that you
won't get in IOS.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:12, Mark Wheadon m...@currybeast.co.uk wrote:
What has been people's experience of Cisco IOS XR on
+1
clock line
crc4
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:41, Martin Moens mo...@carrier2carrier.comwrote:
E1 errors are often caused by clocking issues - are you shure you should
provide clocking on the A-end?
Often clocking is provided by the network.
Tried to switch on crc4?
Martin
On Friday, 11
So you are asking not MSC utilization but interface. There is a SNMP mib you
can use to monitor your interface utilization.
Aaron
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 08:06, bas kilo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a command to view the utilization of a
MSC in a CRS?
We are using
Xmodem might be you're best bet if tftp doesn't work...
Connect via console (assume you already are).
First did you confirm that confreg = 0x2102?
ROMmon Recovery for the Cisco 3600/3700/3800 Series Routers
If the file is over 32mb you need to ensure your tftp server supports large
file size.
For windows, I've had success with tftpd32 http://tftpd32.jounin.net/
Solaris 9 and 10 should have large file support as do recent versions of bsd
and linux.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 21:04, scott owens
M isn't a letter?? :)
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:56, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:48:28AM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
If both devices were the same I would just shrug and think the C2801
wasn't up to the job. But I have one device with no problems
*Step 4 *Type the Cancel User command to close a TL1 session:
*CANC-USER:[TID]:USERID:CTAG;*
*
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/optical/15000r9_0/tl1/sonet/reference/guide/tl1a90r_prprv.html#wp26568
*
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 18:00, Daniel D Jones ddjo...@riddlemaster.orgwrote:
Is there any
Perl.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:21, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote:
hi all
i want to ping several hosts at the same time
if i use tclsh scripting i will be waiting for each ping session to finish
what other ways i have to do ?
___
You would need to change the duplex (half or full) to solve this, not the
speed.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 22:03, Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch
connection) - I thought that setting
speed auto would solve
The distance also depends on the quality of the fiber in the ground, the
quality of the splices, and any connections.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:54, Hansen, Ulrich Vestergaard B. (E R WP EN ES 4
2) u...@siemens.com wrote:
Hi Vinny,
I've got personel and very good experience with optics from
I think you have to stay with the SDH standand so,
E3 not DS3 but you should be able to mix and match E3 and E1.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:28, jack daniels jckdaniel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Please help me with understanding if I have channelised STM1 card -
1) I can configure 3xDS3
1 - 100 of 884 matches
Mail list logo
