Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:06:07PM -0300, juan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:25:14 +1100 > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > > If you read > > his speech, you will see that, at least at this early hour (his maiden > > speech), he is not "a politician" > > > I read enough to find out what h

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 08:19:20AM +0300, Александр wrote: > Thank you very much, Zen! > This is very inspiring to see politicians like this one. Of course, he is > still a politician... he is still part of this fucked up system, BUT ... > there is BUT. And he is this "BUT". > > With politicians l

Re: Jake and Tor article

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Henry Rivera <4chaos.onel...@gmail.com> wrote: > [regurgitation] Better articles exist... https://web.archive.org/web/20060104110330/http://crypto.nsa.org/f-21/blogger-in-the-lions-den.html

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:04:34PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > How about reforming the "modern" "democratic" state with direct > democracy - Swiss style ? Doesn't work: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Schweizer-erlauben-Geheimdienst-umfangreiches-Ueberwachungsarsenal-3331327.html (germ

[WAR] negotiations deciding the fate of the world

* Good news. The despotic USA empire is crumbling, the USA elite factions are sacrificing even the little remaining standing of their empire, on the altar of their political infighting. * Bad news. The USA is crumbling, and being a dying dragon, must be treated with utmost caution, and conti

Re: [WAR] negotiations deciding the fate of the world

I wouldn't be so sure that the dragon will "crumble" and die that easily... When you put yourself in an echo chamber of right wing / pro-Russian / Kremlin propaganda sites you're going to hear events with a certain slant. No different that dealing strictly with MSM. John > On Oct 14, 2016, a

the Anglosphere's double standards - destroying the cult of PC - was Re: Appelbaum, CDC, CCC

Not sure whether including the In-Reply-To header on this one is ideal or not - leaving it in... On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 07:25:10PM -0300, juan wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:08:19 + > Sean Lynch wrote: > > Are they about to experience mass disillusionment and exodus as > > well, just like

Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Anyone wanna 'grab a digital pussy'? Some people like 'em nuts. I'm not interested. Rr Forwarded Message Subject:Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 02:09:30 -0300 From: Cecilia Tanaka I am really wasted, exhausted, breathing

Re: Jake and Tor article

Sound like information suppression to me... Jacob Appelbaum is a 'public person' and subject to conversation, and he expects it. Don't like it? Don't read it. Rr On 10/13/2016 09:04 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > Please, guys, let's kill this thread forever. Sorry, this discussion is > _not_ health

dEFECTIVEbOT

If rxxty was a really well-developed bot it would regurgitate your email address in the reply line for spam harvesters. Rr that and bdf_proxy has onionduke canned into it - NO http downloads Original Message On Oct 2, 2016, 3:19 PM, John wrote: http://securityaffairs.co/w

Fwd: Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Ok, tell the whole story at least. Who did contact me in private first? Do you want I send all the past messages too? -- Forwarded message -- From: "Cecilia Tanaka" Date: Oct 13, 2016 10:54 PM Subject: Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article To: "Razer" My dear Razer, B

Fwd: Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Razer, hysterical as always. -- Forwarded message -- From: "Cecilia Tanaka" Date: Oct 14, 2016 12:45 AM Subject: Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article To: "Razer" On Oct 13, 2016 11:22 PM, "Razer" wrote: > > I haven't been "Hysterical" one day in my life. Well, your c

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Razer, you are strange. I am crazy, but you are crazier. And absolutely hysterical because don't like to lose a discussion, aff... On Oct 14, 2016 10:34 AM, "Razer" wrote: > > Anyone wanna 'grab a digital pussy'? > > Some people like 'em nuts. > > > I'm not interested. > > Rr > > Forwa

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Ok, I can't make anything if Razer prefers sex with little boys and to support Nambla. Sorry to everybody for this public soap opera. It's so bizarre that it becomes funny. I never will purr in laps of crazy hysterical guys like Razer again, I promise. So life goes on... :)

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 07:34 AM, Razer wrote: > > Anyone wanna 'grab a digital pussy'? > > Some people like 'em nuts. > > > I'm not interested. > > Rr You really are an asshole, Razer. Total slime. Scum of the earth. > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jak

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 07:57 AM, Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 07:34 AM, Razer wrote: >> >> Anyone wanna 'grab a digital pussy'? >> >> Some people like 'em nuts. >> >> >> I'm not interested. >> >> Rr > > You really are an asshole, Razer. Total slime. Scum of the earth. I'm an asshole in real life too.

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Oct 14, 2016 11:57 AM, "Mirimir" wrote: > > On 10/14/2016 07:34 AM, Razer wrote: > > > > Anyone wanna 'grab a digital pussy'? > > > > Some people like 'em nuts. > > > > > > I'm not interested. > > > > Rr > > You really are an asshole, Razer. Total slime. Scum of the earth. Don't worry, Mirimir

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Oct 14, 2016 12:08 PM, "Razer" wrote: > > I'm not some ... psychopath You are a hysterical, very noisy and dramatic psychopath, Razer. You are very sick. Please, as I said before, search for psychiatric treatment with urgence. We both are crazy, but I only hurt myself. You hurt other peo

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Why the fuck did you forward this to the list? John On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:34:09AM -0700, Razer wrote: > > Anyone wanna 'grab a digital pussy'? > > Some people like 'em nuts. > > > I'm not interested. > > Rr > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: It's for YOU! Fwd:

ACLU: Black Protesters and other activists stalked by "Geofeedia" on Twitter FB Instagram

It *appears* Twitter thought they were a marketing geolocation company and immediately cut them off . No word from FB or it's wholly pwnd subsidiary Instagram https://www.aclunc.org/blog/facebook-instagram-and-twitter-provided-data-access-surve

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:50:48 +0200 Tom wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:04:34PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > How about reforming the "modern" "democratic" state with direct > > democracy - Swiss style ? > > Doesn't work: > http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Schweizer-erlauben-Geheimd

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

> Why the fuck did you forward this to the list? > > John There is indeed a certain ironic quality to a list like cypherpunks, which is supposed to be privacy-centric, to be used for public displays of private comms like this. I'd like to submit much of this thread as evidence for my much-debated

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 08:29 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > On Oct 14, 2016 12:08 PM, "Razer" > wrote: >> >> I'm not some ... psychopath > > You are a hysterical, very noisy and dramatic psychopath, Razer. > > You are very sick. Please, as I said before, search for psychiatri

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Make Cypherpunks Great Again. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:50:01PM -, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: Why the fuck did you forward this to the list? John There is indeed a certain ironic quality to a list like cypherpunks, which is supposed to be privacy-centric, to be used for public displays o

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 08:50 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: >> Why the fuck did you forward this to the list? >> >> John > > There is indeed a certain ironic quality to a list like cypherpunks, which > is supposed to be privacy-centric, to be used for public displays of > private comms like this. > > I'

Re: Jake and Tor article

On Oct 14, 2016 10:28 AM, "Razer" wrote: > > Sound like information suppression to me... Jacob Appelbaum is a 'public person' and subject to conversation, and he expects it. Don't like it? > Don't read it. Razer, I love Jake and he knows it very well. I was just trying to stop your creepy public

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

2016-10-14 18:52 GMT+03:00 Razer : > Is there some part of "Fuck Off" you fail to comprehend troll? > > Or are you simply looking for codependent sympathy from your next > stalking victims by posting that gibberish? > Razer, i'm sure it's the second option. Mirmir is already deep inside her web..

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Oct 14, 2016 1:08 PM, "Александр" wrote: > > 2016-10-14 18:52 GMT+03:00 Razer : >> >> Is there some part of "Fuck Off" you fail to comprehend troll? >> >> Or are you simply looking for codependent sympathy from your next >> stalking victims by posting that gibberish? > > > Razer, i'm sure it's

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 09:06 AM, Александр wrote: > > 2016-10-14 18:52 GMT+03:00 Razer >: > > Is there some part of "Fuck Off" you fail to comprehend troll? > > Or are you simply looking for codependent sympathy from your next > stalking victims by posting that gi

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

> > Fishing for an age... Wrong. Don't bother trying again. > Not two minutes before you sent the above quoted message, you posted a message saying your reply would be the last in thread. Obviously not. But whatever. Uhm -- No, not fishing at all. Maybe you are a senile 71-yro after all? Because

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 09:22 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: > Maybe you are a senile 1-yro after all? Because your memory is obviously > garbage But... umn, whatever you want to believe troll. Yeah, I said that was my last post in the thread. I misspoke. That's my last post addressing 'aff... CeCe' or

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0200, aestetix wrote: > Make Cypherpunks Great Again. > Lulz! I find it interesting that on John Gilmore's home page, under accomplishments, he says the following about the cypherpunks list: "The Cypherpunks (with Eric Hughes and Tim May) An informal group

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Sorry, I've sent this message in private and forgot Razer likes only public messages. I will give a time and become a lurker again. No time and patience to waste with childish discussions. I apologize for the last threads, full of bullshit. Thank you for everything and, again, pardon for all th

Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 09:57 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > On Oct 14, 2016 10:28 AM, "Razer" wrote: >> >> Sound like information suppression to me... Jacob Appelbaum is a 'public > person' and subject to conversation, and he expects it. Don't like it? >> Don't read it. > > Razer, I love Jake and he knows it

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 09:34 AM, John Newman responded to a troll responding to a troll: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0200, aestetix wrote: >> Make Cypherpunks Great Again. >> > > Lulz! I find it interesting that on John Gilmore's home page, under > accomplishments, he says the following about

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 10:22 AM, xorc...@sigaint.org wrote: >> >> Fishing for an age... Wrong. Don't bother trying again. >> > > Not two minutes before you sent the above quoted message, you posted a > message saying your reply would be the last in thread. Obviously not. > > But whatever. Uhm -- No, not f

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Whoops! Sorry, just read it now. On Oct 14, 2016 1:30 PM, "Razer" wrote: > > Women are perfectly capable of defending their own honor. Agreed. Razer is correct. I am completely able of defending my honor by myself. I didn't ask for any help or sympathy. Now, let's talking about cryptography

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

> It's a waste of time and bandwidth responding to ... Lulz > Or the psychological stalking by Translation: When you call him on lies and bullshit, it's 'psychological stalking' ..thats so full of win, I'm going to start using that. Outright lie, and when called on it 'Hey, don't psychologicall

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:34:59 -0400 John Newman wrote: > > An informal group dedicated to public education and dissemination of > encryption (also known as cryptography, the science and art of secret > writing). I originally hosted the mailing list (cypherpu...@toad.com) > and provided space for

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 06:34 -0700, Razer wrote: > Anyone wanna 'grab a digital #$%&#'? > > Some people like 'em nuts. > > > I'm not interested. No moderator worth his/her salt would ever have approved your posting. Something to think about. Reposting email clearly intended to be private is oft

Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 09:45 AM, Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 09:57 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: >> On Oct 14, 2016 10:28 AM, "Razer" wrote: >>> >>> Sound like information suppression to me... Jacob Appelbaum is a 'public >> person' and subject to conversation, and he expects it. Don't like it? >>> Don't

Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 11:11 AM, Razer wrote: > > > On 10/14/2016 09:45 AM, Mirimir wrote: >> On 10/14/2016 09:57 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: >>> On Oct 14, 2016 10:28 AM, "Razer" wrote: Sound like information suppression to me... Jacob Appelbaum is a 'public >>> person' and subject to conversati

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 06:34 -0700, Razer wrote: >> Anyone wanna 'grab a digital #$%&#'? >> >> Some people like 'em nuts. >> >> >> I'm not interested. > > No moderator worth his/her salt would ever have approved your posting. > Something to think abou

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:46 -0600, Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > No moderator worth his/her salt would ever have approved your posting. > > Something to think about. > > > > Reposting email clearly intended to be private is often in poor taste, > > even if tech

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:51:00 -0500 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on to the > list to begin with, Like your constant calls for censorship and your sick americunt propaganda, for instance. > such as the explicit garbage cle

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 15:07 -0300, juan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:51:00 -0500 > "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > > > > Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on to the > > list to begin with, > > > Like your constant calls for censorship and your sick #$%&#$%&# >

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

hi hi jaun ;- Original Message On Oct 14, 2016, 10:59 AM, juan wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:51:00 -0500 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on to the > list to begin with, Like your constant calls for censorship and your

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 10:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > Reposting email clearly intended to be private Spam mail is intended to be private too. So I shouldn't pass that info on to a sysadmin or other person who might be spammed due to, let's say, hijacked address book? IOW You ARE NOT MAKING A VALID P

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:02:04 -0500 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 15:07 -0300, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 12:51:00 -0500 > > "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > > > > > > > Can we agree that there's crap that never should make it on to the > > > list to begin with, > > > > >

Re: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Razer wrote: > > > >> On 10/14/2016 10:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: >> Reposting email clearly intended to be private > > > Spam mail is intended to be private too. So I shouldn't pass that info > on to a sysadmin or other person who might be spammed due to, l

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 11:51 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 11:46 -0600, Mirimir wrote: >> On 10/14/2016 11:09 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: >>> No moderator worth his/her salt would ever have approved your posting. >>> Something to think about. >>> >>> Reposting email clearly intended to be

Rooty tooty xorcists r us: "101 Ways I Screwed Up Making a Fake Identity"

101 Ways I Screwed Up Making a Fake Identity Posted on October 13, 2016 by hacks4pancakes As most of you know, my professional area of expertise in security is incident response, with an emphasis on system / malware forensics and OSINT. I’m fortunate enough in my position in the security ed

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 12:13 PM, Razer wrote: > I've violated NO ONE'S privacy. You've done what you've done. Others will act accordingly.

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On 10/14/2016 12:00 PM, Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 12:13 PM, Razer wrote: > > > >> I've violated NO ONE'S privacy. > > You've done what you've done. Others will act accordingly. > > > Stupidly ambivalent. Explain how posting an UNWANTED AND UNSOLICITED EMAIL violates the right to pri

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

On Oct 14, 2016 4:22 PM, "Razer" wrote: > > Someone sending me "I want to bury my face in your lap and smell your aroma or I'll commit suicide" Hahaha!!! Sorry, the idea is pretty fun. "Or you let me bury my face in your lap, or I'll commit suicide!" Hahaha!!! It's a direct threat much bette

google is amazing

http://realmoney.thestreet.com/articles/10/11/2016/edtech-loopholes-lead-cracks-googles-student-privacy-policy?cm_ven_int=homepage-latest-headlines "Parents of students across America have been assured -- by Alphabet (GOOGL) and school administrators -- that the carts of Google Chromebooks being

Re: Fwd: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/13/2016 07:50 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: He lost me when he started rambling on with his homespun automotive metaphors /way/ past the point where they became meaningless noise, referencing nothing. But I kept reading anyway, until he REALLY l

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400 Steve Kinney wrote: > Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a > hoax, global warming IS a hoax. > also uniformly represent Agenda 21 as a conspiracy to establish > a One World Government. I don't know what

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On 10/14/2016 04:47 PM, juan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400 > Steve Kinney wrote: > >> Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a >> hoax, > > global warming IS a hoax. Dude, you're a hoax!

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:51:33 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 04:47 PM, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400 > > Steve Kinney wrote: > > > >> Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a > >> hoax, > > > > global warming IS a hoax. > > Dude, you're

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

Global warming is not a hoax. This list is less than useless. John > On Oct 14, 2016, at 6:47 PM, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400 > Steve Kinney wrote: > >> Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a >> hoax, > > global warming IS a hoax. >

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On 10/14/2016 05:05 PM, juan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 16:51:33 -0600 > Mirimir wrote: > >> On 10/14/2016 04:47 PM, juan wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:33 -0400 >>> Steve Kinney wrote: >>> Disinformation shops that push the belief that global warming is a hoax, >>> >>> glo

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:02:01 -0400 John Newman wrote: > Global warming is not a hoax. global warming is a hoax - and as I mentioned before you are not even using the correct scam terminology : global warming > This list is less than useless. translation : useless for

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On 10/14/2016 05:02 PM, John Newman wrote: > Global warming is not a hoax. > > This list is less than useless. Yeah, it died, and then got reanimated by jerks. It's been a classic Usenet-style troll takeover. Sad :( > John > >> On Oct 14, 2016, at 6:47 PM, juan wrote: >> >> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > > As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;) go kill some of your 'customers' with badly cut heroin, asshole. > > >> > > > >

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:18:16 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 05:02 PM, John Newman wrote: > > Global warming is not a hoax. > > > > This list is less than useless. > > Yeah, it died, and then got reanimated by jerks. It's been a classic > Usenet-style troll takeover. Sad :( Why

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600 > Mirimir wrote: > > >> >> As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;) > > > go kill some of your 'customers' with badly cut heroin, asshole. Yes, a fucking hoax who twists shit to support his fraudulent claims. Taking yo

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600 > > Mirimir wrote: > > > > > >> > >> As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;) > > > > > > go kill some of your 'customers' with badly cut heroin, > > asshole. > > Ye

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600 > > Mirimir wrote: > > > > > >> > >> As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;) > > > > > > go kill some of your 'customers' with badly cut heroin, > > asshole. > > Ye

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On 10/14/2016 06:10 PM, juan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600 > Mirimir wrote: > >> On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600 >>> Mirimir wrote: >>> >>> As I said, you're a fucking hoax ;) >>> >>> >>> go kill some of your 'customers' with

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:50 -0600 Mirimir wrote: > On 10/14/2016 06:10 PM, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600 > > Mirimir wrote: > > > >> On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote: > >>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600 > >>> Mirimir wrote: > >>> > >>> > > As I said, you'

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On 10/14/2016 06:39 PM, juan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:19:50 -0600 > Mirimir wrote: > >> On 10/14/2016 06:10 PM, juan wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:42:00 -0600 >>> Mirimir wrote: >>> On 10/14/2016 05:28 PM, juan wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:04:15 -0600 > Mirimir wrote:

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 7:23 PM, juan wrote: > > global warming is a hoax - and as I mentioned before you are not > even using the correct scam terminology : global warming > Global warming is not a hoax. >> This list is less than useless. > > translation : useless for es

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:46:51 -0400 John Newman wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2016, at 7:23 PM, juan wrote: > > > > global warming is a hoax - and as I mentioned before you > > are not even using the correct scam terminology : global warming > > > > > Global warming is not a hoax.

Re: Fwd: [unwanted offlist mail] Re: It's for YOU! Fwd: Re: Jake and Tor article

Hi sea sea honey.- Muslim's are know to treat their women like shit - please run away to America the land of the free. Original Message On Oct 14, 2016, 9:40 AM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:46:51 -0400 John Newman wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2016, at 7:23 PM, j

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:46:51 -0400 John Newman wrote: > What’s your problem with the crypto list? > Too much technical talk? > Not enough Russian propaganda? To be more precise. Expect to find absolutely no russian propaganda, because that list is fully 'moderated'. That is,

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:13 PM, juan wrote: > > > global warming is a hoax. Then again, try telling a > jew-kristian that kristianity is a hoax… > Man, I’m not going to debate climate change with you, its a fucking stupid waste of time. If you honestly don’t believe in scien

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:31:04 -0400 John Newman wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:13 PM, juan wrote: > > > > > > global warming is a hoax. Then again, try telling a > > jew-kristian that kristianity is a hoax… > > > > Man, I’m not going to debate climate change with you, its a f

Re: Fwd: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

On 10/14/2016 03:19 PM, Steve Kinney wrote: > > > On 10/13/2016 07:50 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > He lost me when he started rambling on with his homespun automotive > metaphors /way/ past the point where they became meaningless noise, > referencing nothing. > > But I kept reading anyway,

Re: Inspirational - Senator Culleton's Passionate Maiden Senate Speech gets Standing Ovation - YouTube

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:57 PM, juan wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:31:04 -0400 > John Newman wrote: > >> >>> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:13 PM, juan wrote: >>> >>> >>> global warming is a hoax. Then again, try telling a >>> jew-kristian that kristianity is a hoax… >>> >> >> Man,

Intercept's Micah Lee Tips Clinton On How To Maintain Corruption and Secrecy

This is grand... https://theintercept.com/2016/10/13/on-wikileaks-journalism-and-privacy-reportin g-on-the-podesta-archive-is-an-easy-call/ "The more public power someone has, the less privacy they are entitled to claim" -- Glenn Greenwald So then why are your editorial subordinates helping and k

Re: Intercept's Micah Lee Tips Clinton On How To Maintain Corruption and Secrecy

Micah Lee is a cunt who thinks throwing website visitors under the Cloudflare bus is an acceptable thing to do. I personally wouldn't trust him with anything privacy or freedom related. oshwm. On 15 October 2016 04:22:36 GMT+01:00, grarpamp wrote: >This is grand... > >https://theintercept.com/2