Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrailen 171 - vrouter vifdump mirroring enhancement for bond-slave-links

Rajagopalan Sivaramakrishnan wrote: >>>The 4.1 dates are not finalized yet, but I think the code-complete date will >>>be in June/July. The blueprints will need >>>to be approved before that, which should not be a problem for this feature. >>>FYI, we will be moving to DPDK 17.02 >>>in 4.1,

[opencontrail-dev] Elastic Flow Distributor

In DPDK 1702 Intel added support for Elastic Flow Distributor which might be able to boost Contrail vRouter performance. When Contrail upgrades from DPDK 2.1 to 1702 or later it would be worth looking at adding support. Has anyone looked at EFD? If not I can get some more information on it

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Vrouter UT compilation on master branch

Which set of instructions have you been following on the build process? If those packages aren't listed in the instructions as a prereq step then you should propose a change to add them. From: Dev [mailto:dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org] On Behalf Of Deepak Tiwari Sent: Thursday, April 13,

Re: [opencontrail-dev] OpenContrail Quick Start

You’re right that “getting started” documentation is a major area for improvement. We’ve got a new documentation repository where I hope we will be able to start consolidating the best information and weeding out the older and less accurate information, but currently it’s just a skeleton.

Re: [opencontrail-dev] [Users] Opencontrail thirdparty packages install errors.

You have a DNS issue on your machine. “unable to resolve host address ‘github.com’” means that your machine is failing to lookup github.com. You need to have working DNS before you start. The place where the script breaks is in verifying the MD5 hash on a package that the script is trying to

[opencontrail-dev] CI question "recheck no bug"

I see fairly often that someone posts a "recheck no bug" comment to Gerrit. I assume this means that the CI failed for reasons that are unrelated to the specific commit and the CI needs to be re-run for that commit. Is there an underlying problem that is known? Are there obstacles to getting

[opencontrail-dev] [CIWG] Community Infrastructure Working Group meeting

I'd like to schedule a meeting of the Community Infrastructure Working Group as discussed at the OpenContrail Summit. The volunteers from the summit are: * Paul Carver (AT) paul.car...@att.com * Pranav Singh (Aricent) * Nabeel Asim (Tech true up) * Jakub Pavlik (Mirantis) *

Re: [opencontrail-dev] [GovernanceWG] Governance Documents Repo

Valentine Sinitsyn [mailto:valentine.sinit...@gmail.com] wrote: On 06.07.2017 17:05, CARVER, PAUL wrote: >> I don’t how likely it is that users are subscribed to the >> opencontrail-dev list, so the first step would be to reach out to >> current people l

[opencontrail-dev] [GovernanceWG] Election of additional member

Greg, Has there been any progress on the creation of a governance Git repository under the current Gerrit CI? I don't see anything. The first formal resolution to go into the repository is going to be the election of a fifth member of the GWG. I believe each of the three candidates were going

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Requesting blueprint feedback - Display mirroring information in Analytics

It looks pretty straightforward, but I've posted some comments to the review requesting a bit more detail. Hopefully someone else can also take a look at this spec. From: Dev [mailto:dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org] On Behalf Of Sudheer Boggavarapu Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 03:58 To:

[opencontrail-dev] [GovernanceWG] Governance Documents Repo

One of the outcomes of the OpenContrail Summit last week was the recommendation to establish a governance repo similar to OpenStack's: https://github.com/openstack/governance This would be a git repository under Gerrit with mirroring to GitHub. The purpose of this repo is to hold community

Re: [opencontrail-dev] [GovernanceWG] Governance Documents Repo

com>; CARVER, PAUL <pc2...@att.com>; dev@lists.opencontrail.org Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] [GovernanceWG] Governance Documents Repo I’ve seen two patterns in the communities. 1. Communities which have substantial active user presence. (ONAP) do not have a separate user advisor

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Need help in setting up vRouter in DPDK-enabled mode

Deepak, I don’t know what platform you’re running on that doesn’t support SSE4.2, but just in case it’s a VirtualBox VM running on a computer with a physical CPU that DOES support SSE4.2, take a look at https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch09.html#sse412passthrough From: Dev

[opencontrail-dev] [GovernanceWG][TSCWG][CIWG] Initial directory structure for contrail-community-docs repo

I have created an initial directory structure and some README files for the contrail-community-docs repo which will be the place where we're going to start creating governance documents and resolutions. https://review.opencontrail.org/34136 ___ Dev

Re: [opencontrail-dev] OpenContrail Quick Start

only on GitHub while other repos have the authoritative source on Gerrit and an automated mirror from Gerrit to GitHub. From: Nabeel Asim [mailto:na...@techtrueup.com] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 11:56 To: CARVER, PAUL <pc2...@att.com>; 'Abhijit Gadgil' <gabhi...@iitbombay.o

[opencontrail-dev] Slide deck from the OCUG meeting

Randy, Thanks for your presentation at the Open Contrail Users Group last week. Can you please post a public link to your slide deck for people who were unable to attend or who didn't take phone photos of every slide. Especially, the link to the Google Group needs to go out so that everyone on

[opencontrail-dev] wiki.opencontrail.org

Does wiki.opencontrail.org exist? I'm getting a DNS resolution failure. This link https://wiki.opencontrail.org/wiki/GerritJenkinsGit#Test_Failures appears in the Zuul message on a build failure (e.g. https://review.opencontrail.org/#/c/30895/ ) but the link is no good because the entire

[opencontrail-dev] OpenContrail summit and governance

Hello OpenContrail Community, In preparation for the OpenContrail summit on June 28th, I've put together an initial draft of document to stimulate discussion on project governance as well as processes and obstacles related to contributing to Contrail. If you're interested in making it easier

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Slide deck from the OCUG meeting

ing=DwMGaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=xtmPik_TP2fjPVGWP4yBRQ=qBJyN21tFUOQnhwSbT_-DNeThodF6UM5T02kTVn5uvc=EPSfK2ER9MzTWj6yWXP6H-qk2CsLqTqgd23L8_Nl26s=> From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 13:44 To: Harshad Nakil <hna...@gmail.com>; CARVER, PAUL

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Slide deck from the OCUG meeting

/opencontrail-founding PS. There might be a tiny bit of sarcasm in this email. From: Dev [mailto:dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org] On Behalf Of CARVER, PAUL Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 14:39 To: Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com>; Harshad Nakil <hna...@gmail.com

[opencontrail-dev] [CIWG] Polling for interest in Community Infrastructure Working Group meetings

The CIWG meetings are being held weekly on Tuesdays at 1800 UTC. Please let me know if you would like to be added to the meeting invite. (no need to reply if you are already on the invite) ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.opencontrail.org

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail Route Targets

Route targets are used in the typical manner of MPLS networks to define network reachability, but you only have to specify them explicitly when you interoperate with BGP routers that are not under Contrail's control. It's not a matter of physical vs virtual. Any non-Contrail router that you're

Re: [opencontrail-dev] [TSC WG] Transitioning to open source - PLEASE VOTE

I agree. There may be certain cases where certain features are mutually exclusive. For example, desire for absolute highest possible packet throughput may be at odds with some feature that requires a large amount of processing per packet. However, even in that case, I think it will still be in

Re: [opencontrail-dev] [TSC] Request for bios for the ARB

I would also like to be considered for being a member of the ARB. Paul Carver is a principle member of technical staff at AT working on Contrail and OpenStack based SDN. After being involved in AT's Neutron+OvS+GRE overlay deployment he led an evaluation of available OpenStack compatible SDN

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Proposed OpenContrail @ KubeCon agenda

...@juniper.net>; Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; Gregory Elkinbard <gelkinb...@juniper.net>; CARVER, PAUL <pc2...@att.com>; dev@lists.opencontrail.org; Rudra Rugge <rru...@juniper.net> Subject: RE: Proposed OpenContrail @ KubeCon agenda Sounds good to me.

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Proposed OpenContrail @ KubeCon agenda

The more questions the better. The ideal would be no slides and all questions, answers and discussions. No formal pre-work is required, but I would encourage anyone who is contemplating any Contrail development to spend a little time thinking about what you think your development steps will be

Re: [opencontrail-dev] We need a new name

Could be worse: https://www.schlockmercenary.com/2008-08-08 https://www.schlockmercenary.com/2008-08-10 -- Paul Carver VoIP: 732-545-7377 Cell: 908-803-1656 E: pcar...@att.com Q Instant Message It is difficult to make predictions. Especially about the future. From: Dev

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Proposed OpenContrail @ KubeCon agenda

The December 7th event has been cancelled. There's a short "user track" at the end of the day on the 6th, but no separate event on the 7th. Greg told me yesterday that he was going to send out Eventbrite invites yesterday but I didn't see them so I assume he ran out of time before getting to

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Proposed OpenContrail @ KubeCon agenda

car...@att.com> Q Instant Message It is difficult to make predictions. Especially about the future. From: Gregory Elkinbard [mailto:gelkinb...@juniper.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 22:30 To: CARVER, PAUL <pc2...@att.com>; Aniket Daptari <aniket.contr...@gmail.com>; S

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Demo of setting up a Contrail dev environment

: 732-545-7377 Cell: 908-803-1656 E: pcar...@att.com<mailto:pcar...@att.com> Q Instant Message It is difficult to make predictions. Especially about the future. From: Dev [mailto:dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org] On Behalf Of CARVER, PAUL Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 15:30 T

[opencontrail-dev] [TSC][Governance] OpenStack Release Cycle and Contrail

In case people don't follow the OpenStack development mailing list, I'd like to point out a current discussion: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125473.html The discussion is about a possible move to a once per year release cycle for OpenStack with one Project

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Next OpenContrail summit at Kubecon Austin

I would recommend making travel plans based on the Austin convention center with the following schedule: Arrive by noon December 5th if you're interested in governance Arrive by noon December 6th if you're interested in developer level discussion of code and tooling Arrive by mid-afternoon on

Re: [opencontrail-dev] We need a new name

I don’t know how to convince the LF and Juniper lawyers, but I completely agree. I want a commercial support arrangement, but I don’t want commercial software that is “based on” or “derived from” Open Source. I want a commercial support contract for software that *IS* Open Source. The

[opencontrail-dev] Demo of setting up a Contrail dev environment

We will be recording a demo of setting up a Contrail development environment from scratch on Wednesday December 13th at 1300UTC using the scripting that Alex Levine has been working on. Anyone who would like to join in and observe and/or ask questions is welcome. If you’d like to follow along

Re: [opencontrail-dev] OpenContrail TSC calls

Possible TSC agenda items: * Creation of "Series goal" and "Milestone target" values in Launchpad. Who has the technical ability to create these and what entries should be created. * Review of blueprints * https://blueprints.launchpad.net/opencontrail/+spec/evpn-type-5 *

Re: [opencontrail-dev] [Announce] Opinion Please: Help Choose OpenContrail's New Name

The Linux Foundation refuses to accept the OpenContrail trademark if they can’t also have the Contrail trademark. So, although you feel that they are not similar, we don’t have any leverage to override LF’s decision. Unless you really think we should abandon the move to LF (please don’t) and go

Re: [opencontrail-dev] We have a new name!!!

You're thinking of polycrystalline tungsten. This is tungsten FABRIC where the warp and weft of the fabric allude to the pure single-crystalline form (admittedly fabric isn't body centered cubic, but the name is merely evocative) which retains its hardness but is more ductile and malleable. And