The vote on release of NBPackage 1.0-beta5 passed with 3x binding votes.
+1 binding votes :
Eric Barboni https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=skygo
Michael Bien https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=mbien
Neil C Smith https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=neilcsmith
+1 (binding)
And closing the vote.
Thanks,
Neil
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 13:55, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache NetBeans NBPackage 1.0-beta5.
>
> NBPackage is a command line tool and library for packaging a NetBeans
> IDE or platform applica
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 13:00, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
> When i have a project running in NB, and if i make a change in the
> source (a really nasty one, like inserting a closing paren halfway) then
> i get a lot of (underline wiggly markers) errors (logical!), but when i
> repair the errors
A signed and notarized macOS package has been added to the nightlies
installers for testing. This was built using the in-vote NBPackage
1.0-beta5 to handle new macOS icon and Truffle runtime signing.
Please help with testing this.
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache NetBeans NBPackage 1.0-beta5.
NBPackage is a command line tool and library for packaging a NetBeans
IDE or platform application zip bundle into a native installer or
package. It supports optional bundling of a Java runtime. It is
inspired by the JDK's
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 11:11, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
>
> Err. it's in the javac.
>
> Sorry. Please ignore.
>
The issue is likely in how NetBeans uses this code. eg. see
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/7331
Can you confirm if the project is using JPMS?
Thanks,
Neil
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 10:08, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> Is there a kind of omni search feature in NB as you have in IntelliJ when
> you lookup a string? I have to admit that the CTRL+O to open a symbol is
> perfect, but I really miss the lookup for the string in the other resources
> files of the
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 12:54, Blake McBride wrote:
> It is my opinion that NetBeans should support JDK 8 for as long as JDK 8 is
> supported. Extended support is provided by Oracle till 2030. Other groups
> (Azul) also support JDK 8 till 2030. It's hard for me to imagine what the
> rush to
/phonebook.html?uid=thilina01
Neil C Smith https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=neilcsmith
Antonio Vieiro https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=vieiro
Junichi Yamamoto https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=junichi11
+1 community votes :
James Gosling*
Kai Uwe Pel
Brad Walker
Giles
Voting and closing off the vote .. thanks all.
[x] yes / +1
[ ] no / -1 (please justify -1)
[x] binding (member of PMC)
My vote is based on
[x] I have built and tested the source with OpenJDK 11 on Ubuntu 22.04
(required)
[x] I have tested the binary zip with OpenJDK 21 on Ubuntu 22.04
[x] I
This is our first voting candidate for the release of Apache NetBeans 21.
Please follow the voting template at the bottom of this email, and
note all requirements
below for validating sources and convenience binaries before voting.
Apache NetBeans 21 constitutes all clusters in the Apache
The vote on release of NBPackage 1.0-beta4 passed with 3x binding
votes and 1x community vote.
+1 binding votes :
Eric Barboni https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=skygo
Michael Bien https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=mbien
Neil C Smith https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html
+1 (binding)
... and closing the vote.
Thanks,
Neil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans
gt;> AVG
> >>> Win32:MalOb-IJ [Cryp]
> >>> SecureAge
> >>> Malicious
> >>>
> >>> Apart from that, I tested:
> >>>
> >>> *Product Version:* Apache NetBeans IDE 21-rc3
> >>>
> >>> *Java:* 17; Java H
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache NetBeans NBPackage 1.0-beta4.
NBPackage is a command line tool and library for packaging a NetBeans
IDE or platform application zip bundle into a native installer or
package. It supports optional bundling of a Java runtime. It is
inspired by the JDK's
The third release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 21 is available
(links below). This will be our final release candidate unless
high/critical priority issues or pull requests are flagged. Please
kick the tyres well over the coming week or so! This includes testing
building from source and
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 at 17:13, Ernie Rael wrote:
> I don't get the earlier comment about which gradle version the IDE
> thinks it's using
The current fallback is basically running init on the Gradle version
matching the Tooling API version, then updating the wrapper.
eg.
gradle init (project on
Hi,
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 23:33, Ernie Rael wrote:
> If there's going to be an RC-3, I'll wait for that. (was it skipped last
> week?)
If possible could you test the dev build at
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/7029 (direct link in PR
comment) and confirm you're getting new projects set
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 at 23:33, Ernie Rael wrote:
> If there's going to be an RC-3, I'll wait for that. (was it skipped last
> week?)
Yes, there will be an rc3 due to some issues that have cropped up
(including this), and some waiting or inbound pull requests.
It was skipped last week because
On Sun, 4 Feb 2024, 22:12 Ernie Rael, wrote:
> On 24/02/04 7:11 AM, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 20:21, Ernie Rael wrote:
> >> With NB-21-RC2, running on JDK-21,
> >> doing: NewProject > JavaWithGradle > JavaClassLibrary
> >>
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 20:21, Ernie Rael wrote:
>
> With NB-21-RC2, running on JDK-21,
> doing: NewProject > JavaWithGradle > JavaClassLibrary
> And there is the "resolve problems" icon.
>
> $ ./gradlew --version
> Gradle 8.4
I presume you're running that from the IDE?
Using that wizard
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 17:42, Neil C Smith wrote:
> The second release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 21 is available
> (links below).
I've built, signed and uploaded a macOS installer for 21-rc2 to the
following link -
https://nightlies.apache.org/netbeans/candidate/installers/
T
The second release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 21 is available
(links below).
Changes since NetBeans 21-rc1 can be seen at
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/21-rc2
Please help with testing, and file issues in GitHub as necessary -
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues
The first release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 21 is available
(links below).
Changes since NetBeans 20 can be seen at
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/21-rc1
Please help with testing, and file issues in GitHub as necessary -
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues
If
Hi,
Spec version increment is in, so master is open again.
Please be careful of potential conflicts with delivery syncing when
merging to master. Delivery will sync to master roughly weekly, with
next sync to master after 21-rc2.
Thanks,
Neil
Hi All,
As per earlier email, today is feature freeze for NetBeans 21, and the
delivery and release branches are being set up.
**Master is closed for a few hours - please don't merge anything until
the spec version increment is in and a follow up email sent.**
All open pull requests for NB21
A reminder that we branch tomorrow. Thanks everyone for all your work
on reviewing and merging PRs as we prepare to kick off the release
process for NetBeans 21.
Any PRs not merged today will be pushed back to NetBeans 22 by
default. Anything that requires merging to NetBeans 21 from tomorrow
Hi,
This vote passed with 4 +1 binding votes. Artefacts will now be moved
into position and the PR updated to use in the IDE build.
Matthias Bläsing - https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=matthiasblaesing
Jan Lahoda - https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=jlahoda
Neil C Smith
+1 (binding)
.. and closing the vote.
Thanks all,
Neil
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 18:00, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> This is a vote on the Windows launcher native binaries. As the binary
> artefacts are consumed by the IDE build, we need to release them
> separately when they n
This is a vote on the Windows launcher native binaries. As the binary
artefacts are consumed by the IDE build, we need to release them
separately when they need updating.
The main purpose of this version is to bring in the support for
to_enable files as part of adding the ability to safely enable
Hi All,
This is advance notice that we're intending to freeze and branch for
NetBeans 21 on January 16th.
As we wind down towards NetBeans 21, please help with reviewing
remaining pending pull requests by January 15th.
Please be release aware - merged PRs should be ready for release and
not
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 10:55, Martin Balin wrote:
> What is the branch time for NetBeans 21?
Same date - Jan 15th -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Release+Schedule
If it's me doing it, I tend to always do the first Monday on or after
the date as that makes things easier.
Hi Martin,
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 07:55, Martin Balin wrote:
> I’m planning to do just VSNetBeans release around Jan 15th, versioned
> 20.0.301.
> NetBeans VSCode gathered number of fixes and improvements over last 2 months …
Assuming we branch on time for NB21, that means that the first
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 19:24, Svata Dedic wrote:
> I am working (finishing) on an extension of (still private) Project
> Dependency API that would allow to *add* dependency to a project (and
> also remove). This is a change that will span both Maven and Gradle
> modules, so I thought I'll put a
Hi All,
Firstly, a big thank you to Eric for handling the NetBeans 20 release
build and vote! Due to a bereavement I had to hand over everything I
had been planning to do at short notice.
I've now finished updating all of the community installers to NetBeans
20 and Java 21.
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 10:21, Martin Balín wrote:
>
> Tested the pkg installer on macOS 13.5.2 and it works.
>
> Just minor thing I’ve noticed what is installed in Applications does not have
> version. E.g. I have 2x
> Apache NetBeans.app
> Apache NetBeans.app
> Now guess which one is 19 and
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 19:28, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 14:37, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > Testing and feedback would be appreciated before we commit to shipping
> > this installer for the release.
>
> A big thank you to everyone who tested the new ins
The fourth release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 20 is available
(links below). This will be our final release candidate unless further
high/critical priority issues or pull requests are flagged. Please
help with final testing - we will hopefully move to a release vote
early next week.
Hi all,
We've got one remaining open PR for delivery which is waIting on a
requested review, which I'll leave for merging another 24hrs.
Other than that, there have been a couple of conversations on possible fixes.
Anyone got anything inbound, or an issue they think still needs to be
addressed
On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 at 17:41, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> If I remember well, in the old days there were a local task repository
> based on TODO messages.
The Action Items window?
> Do we know what is the present state of the Task Repositories support.
> Does that have a future in NB?
I don't
The third release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 20 is available
(links below). This will be our final release candidate unless
high/critical priority issues or pull requests are flagged. Please
kick the tyres well over the coming week or so! This includes testing
building from source and
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 08:02, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> Am Freitag, dem 27.10.2023 um 22:20 -0500 schrieb Josh Juneau:
> > I have been testing NetBeans 20 RC2 and it looks like the "Project
> > Properties" dialog is not opening, as expected. Typically when
> > right-clicking on a
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 at 06:35, Patrik Karlström wrote:
>
> FWIW, I have no such problem with rc2 on Fedora linux.
It only affects Maven projects without a parent project.
Best wishes,
Neil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
The second release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 20 is available
(links below).
Changes since NetBeans 20-rc1 can be seen at
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/20-rc2
Please help with testing, and file issues in GitHub as necessary -
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues
The first release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 20 is available
(links below).
Changes since NetBeans 19 can be seen at
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/20-rc1
Please help with testing, and file issues in GitHub as necessary -
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues
If
Hi,
Spec version increment is in, so master is open again.
Please be careful of potential conflicts with delivery syncing when
merging to master. Delivery will sync to master roughly weekly, with
next sync to master after 20-rc2.
Thanks.
Neil
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 09:31, Neil C Smith wrote
Hi All,
As per earlier email, today is feature freeze for NetBeans 20, and the
delivery and release branches are being set up.
**Master is closed for a few hours - please don't merge anything until
the spec version increment is in and a follow up email sent.**
All open pull requests for NB20
should be opened / rebased against delivery for review.
The main branch will be closed for a few hours as normal tomorrow
while we handle branching and update module versions - I'll keep you
posted!
Thanks,
Neil
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 11:47, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thi
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:59, Michael Bien wrote:
>
> On 12.10.23 11:51, Eric Barboni wrote:
> > Well I think there is a reference to the version here:
> > apisupport/maven.apisupport/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/apisupport/MavenNbModuleImpl.java
>
> this is the default value, it is updated in
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 17:15, Eric Barboni wrote:
> Would it make sense to propose vote for nbm plugin before freeze ?
>
> Having a release that can handle jdk21 could be helpful, still no
> nb-package
If we need to release prior to freeze to have the IDE handle JDK 21,
then yes. Or after
+1 (binding)
Checked contents, hashes and signing.
Checked files match the workflow artefacts.
Updated https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/6521 and verified
dev-build functionality on macOS M1 (only used artefacts for now).
As noted elsewhere, please make sure to change the parent folder
+1 (binding)
Checked contents, hashes and signing.
Checked files match the workflow artefacts.
Updated https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/6502 and verified
dev-build functionality on Linux and macOS M1.
As noted elsewhere, please make sure to change the parent folder name
to match the
.
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/6502
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/6521
I thought we'd need to filter out the notice and license from the
profiler libs, but actually they're already skipped. However, did
need adding to the gitignore.
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 12:39, Neil C Smith
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 at 15:48, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 04.10.2023 um 20:44 +0100 schrieb Neil C Smith:
> > If the vote doesn't pass then someone else will need to do the
> > various PRs (I'm tied up most of next week), or we delay freeze, or
> > we have an
This vote was cancelled due to issues raised with the binary artefact.
New vote to follow.
Thanks,
Neil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
This vote was cancelled due to issues raised with the binary artefact.
New vote to follow.
Thanks,
Neil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
This vote is cancelled along with the profiler native binaries vote.
Revised voting artefacts and new vote thread to follow.
Neil
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 11:27, Neil C Smith wrote:
>
> This is a vote on the dlight.nativeexecution native binaries. As the
> binary artefacts are consumed b
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 08:57, Antonio wrote:
>
> Ah, I see now.
>
> So we'll need votes for lib.profiler, dlight.nativeexecution, the
> launchers and some other native libraries and utilities (CND has two or
> three shared libraries/executables as well).
>
> So why not build, deliver and vote all
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, 21:00 Antonio, wrote:
> We currently depend on exechlp-1.2.zip [1] for dlight.nativeexecution,
> right? But nobody has voted _explicitly_ on that dependency.
>
That's a pre-ASF binary as far as I know. However the ASF profiler binaries
should really have been voted on and
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, 21:23 Laszlo Kishalmi,
wrote:
>
> On 10/5/23 12:57, Neil C Smith wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, 19:51 Laszlo Kishalmi,
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Just a question, as the vote has been pulled off.
> >>
> >> Is it possible to cre
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, 19:51 Laszlo Kishalmi,
wrote:
> Just a question, as the vote has been pulled off.
>
> Is it possible to create the binaries cross compile the profiler library
> on Linux?
>
Not sure. No or with difficulty maybe.
What problem would that solve though? Do we expect everyone
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 18:53, Antonio wrote:
> -1 (binding).
>
> AFAIK the source code is already hosted at [1] (with whichever
> modifications required to build properly), has been already voted upon
> previously, has been already reviewed, has proper NOTICE and license
> information and there's
Hi All,
This is advance notice that we're intending to freeze and branch for
NetBeans 20 on October 17th.
As we wind down towards NetBeans 20, please help with reviewing
remaining pending pull requests by October 16th.
Please be release aware - merged PRs should be ready for release and
not
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 00:35, Kenneth Fogel
wrote:
> I know that the in such a project that if there are issues, I should just
> pitch in and resolve them myself. Unfortunately, it will be simpler to change
> IDEs. Not really. For what it's worth the Eclipse IDE continues to have
> issues, so
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, 20:07 Matthias Bläsing,
wrote:
> I was asked to reply here:
>
> I'm irritated, that votes are called for packages, that violate Apache
> Release requirements (at least to my understanding).
>
> I will not vote on dlight.nativeexecution as I assume the reaction will
> also be
This is a vote on the dlight.nativeexecution native binaries. As the
binary artefacts are consumed by the IDE build, we need to release
them separately when they need updating.
The main purpose of this version is to allow us to ship Apple Silicon
support for the terminal in NetBeans 20.
Primary
against the
> corresponding repository dir. The rest of the file is a placeholder
> directory structure, which looks like it could be replace by "mkdir -p
> $DEST" in the build scripts.
>
> Greetings
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 03.10.2023 um 10
This is a vote on the lib.profiler native binaries. As the binary
artefacts are consumed by the IDE build, we need to release them
separately when they need updating.
The main purpose of this version is to allow us to ship Apple Silicon
support for the profiler in NetBeans 20.
Primary voting
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 12:19, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> I am doing all my open source and home projects on macOS, which is the only
> home computer brand I have (no Win in my home), but for the moment I don't
> have yet a Silicon. If I can help, please let me know and Yes I definitely
> wish
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023, 21:37 Michael Bien, wrote:
> > Publishing binaries via Maven doesn't seem viable for this given
> > cross-OS build needed, so possibly looking at dist.a.o instead.
> (I assume you mean maven central the repo and not mvn the build system)
> Out of curiosity, why is it a
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 13:35, Neil C Smith
wrote: the generate headers section of each build -
> I assume we could check the headers into a separate repo? But I don't
> think we gain much by doing so, rather than adding a pre-build stage
> on the existing workflow to build a sour
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 12:41, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Just my 5 cents: in Maven the mvnd project does deliver mac silicon binary,
> and it works nicely.
And the release binaries are built with GH workflow? Any concerns
raised / problems doing so?
> Also, if needed, I can offer my M2 macMini
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 12:33, Eric Barboni wrote:
> But I thing we should tesselate the repo for thoose native stuff and make
> release that we later use on netbeans main repo.
> Maven was a choice to simplify release process but may not be compatible
> with macos.
I was in favour of a
Hi,
The lack of native binaries supporting Apple Silicon (eg. profiler and
terminal) is becoming more and more of an issue, and costing us users.
I assume that is something we wish to address?! And incidentally,
while we're at it, if you're a NetBeans PMC member or committer using
it on macOS
On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 10:44, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> We are upgrading from Maven 3.8 to 3.9 for our NB platform apps. I now have
> those new warnings poping up (we compile with java 8 source):
They're probably not new, just hidden by default before! A bunch of
default plugin versions
On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 08:12, Martin Balin wrote:
> I plan to release VSNetBeans 19.0.301 based from master on Sep 18th. There is
> number of updates for Language Server features done after 19 was branched
> which I would like to get to Marketplace.
> It will be done using special just
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:50, Mike Ryan wrote:
> I created this issue that I inappropriately brought up in the vote for the NB
> 19 release.
>
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/6399
>
> I realize I still need to provide a minimal code example. But just wanted to
> get something added.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 16:31, Mike Ryan wrote:
> No, not yet. -m
This is a vote thread - please keep it for voting emails only, and
start a new thread or open an issue to discuss this!
Thanks,
Neil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[X] yes / +1
[ ] no / -1 (please justify -1)
[X] binding (member of PMC)
My vote is based on
[X] I have built and tested the source with JDK 11 (plus test on JDK
20) on Ubuntu 22.04 (required)
[X] I have tested the binary zip with JDK 20 on Ubuntu 22.04
[X] I have tested the DEB installer with
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 06:26, Eirik Bakke wrote:
> But the problem remains, and I was never able to reproduce it reliably--it
> was always intermittent.
>
> If anyone can manage to reliably reproduce the bug, that would probably go a
> long way towards finding a fix.
Have you tried the
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 01:14, Michael Bien wrote:
> On 29.08.23 00:50, Kenneth Fogel wrote:
> > I have mentioned this before, but the situation is getting worse. More
> > often than not, I must cut the text, paste the text
>
> this issue is tracked here:
This is our first voting candidate for the release of Apache NetBeans 19.
Please follow the NEW voting template at the bottom of this email, and
note all requirements
below for validating sources and convenience binaries before voting.
Apache NetBeans 19 constitutes all clusters in the Apache
Hi all,
As much an update for everyone else than intended for the release
team, as we've communicated on this elsewhere (Slack, etc.)
It's currently looking likely we'll proceed with the NB19 vote next
week. Unfortunately the usual August fun of coordinating when
everyone is available to manage
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, 11:18 Eric Bresie, wrote:
> Looks like Gradle 8.3 is released now
>
> https://github.com/gradle/gradle/releases/tag/v8.3.0
We're not currently planning to update the tooling API in NB19. However, it
would be good to verify new Gradle projects in 19-rc5 are correctly
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 14:37, Neil C Smith wrote:
> Testing and feedback would be appreciated before we commit to shipping
> this installer for the release.
A big thank you to everyone who tested the new installer - your
feedback was much appreciated! I think it shows we're good t
The fifth release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 19 is available
(links below). This will be our final release candidate unless
high/critical priority issues or pull requests are flagged. Please
kick the tyres well over the coming week or so! This includes testing
building from source and
On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 at 21:10, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Reasoning:
>
>Plugin unsigned. Please sign (self-signed is ok) and re-submit for
>verification
>
> This was not a problem in: 11, 12, 16 and 17.
>
> _Nothing_ changed for these plugins and I don't see why I should was
> resources in
On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 at 06:22, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> Well I fear, there is nothing we can do about this for NetBeans 19.
> Later on we can add a DSL language selector also a Gradle Version
> selector to the new project dialog, these need a slight API change at least.
>
> It would be also
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 at 16:01, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
> Gradle 8.3-rc1 came very late in the game, but it is the one which
> finally supports JDK 20 as runtime. That's why we dropped that in.
> Please test!
So, we need to build 19-rc5 soon, which will hopefully be identical to
the release.
Do we
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 15:17, Carl Mosca wrote:
> For me it created "Apache NetBeans" in the Applications folder (as opposed to
> /Applications/NetBeans). Previously, the NetBeans version was part of the
> name.
Yes, this is also part of supporting in-place upgrading. The
NBPackage-based
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 15:03, James Ostrowick wrote:
> Can confirm it works fine on a MBP 2021 ARM running Ventura 13.5.
> Installed with no issues
>
> The behaviour is slightly different from before where it would install in a
> folder in applications called “NetBeans” it now just installs in
Hi.
Due to a variety of issues with the existing macOS installer (eg.
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues/6052 ), and also the lack of
people who can actually produce it, we're considering moving to an
NBPackage produced installer instead.
I've uploaded a PKG installer for NetBeans 19-rc4
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 at 15:05, Benjamin Asbach wrote:
> I recognized that the slack invite link on the NetBeans website is
> expired. I opened a issue [1] about that. Neil closed it mentioning to
> discuss the topic on the mailing list - here we are ;)
Thanks! Just trying to keep website and
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023, 18:53 Scott Palmer, wrote:
> Seems to be working well. I see Gradle 8.3-rc-3 is available, but didn't
> make it into NetBeans19-RC4. I haven't noticed any regressions, so I would
> try to squeeze in whatever the latest artifact is for Gradle 8.3 when the
> final NB 19 build
The fourth release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 19 is available
(links below). This will be our final release candidate unless
high/critical priority issues or pull requests are flagged. Please
kick the tyres well over the coming week or so! This includes testing
building from source and
This vote is now closed and passed with 3 binding +1 votes :
Eric Barboni
Micheal Bien
Neil C Smith
Thanks Eric and Michael. I'll proceed with moving the artefacts to release now.
Best wishes,
Neil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
> Regards
> Eric
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Eric Barboni
> Envoyé : samedi 29 juillet 2023 11:18
> À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans NBPackage 1.0-beta3
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> everything looks ok to me.
>
> Be
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache NetBeans NBPackage 1.0-beta3.
NBPackage is a command line tool and library for packaging a NetBeans
IDE or platform application zip bundle into a native installer or
package. It supports optional bundling of a Java runtime. It is
inspired by the JDK's
The third** release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 19 is
available (links below).
Changes since NetBeans 19-rc1 can be seen at
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/19-rc3
** the eagle-eyed might notice we skipped the 19-rc2 build! :-)
Please help with testing, and file issues in
The first release candidate build for Apache NetBeans 19 is available
(links below).
Changes since NetBeans 18 can be seen at
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/releases/tag/19-rc1
Please help with testing, and file issues in GitHub as necessary -
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/issues
If
1 - 100 of 1707 matches
Mail list logo
