RE: svn commit: r1756954 [1/2] - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ openssl/

Great commit messages! > -Original Message- > From: truck...@apache.org [mailto:truck...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:28 > To: comm...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1756954 [1/2] - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ > openssl/ > > Author: truckman > Date: Fri

Internationalization of 4.1.2-patch1 (was RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat")

All of the information on the release of 4.1.2-patch1, including readmes and messages from the patch install and uninstall scripts, is in English. See and the Readme files. Also, the Windows package contains install

RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat"

Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 *does* *not* install hwp.dll. It should not be there. That is one of the ways that we can determine that the patch is likely being applied to 4.1.2 and not an incorrect version. hwp.dll was removed as part of the resolution of CVE-2015-1774,

RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat"

> -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 09:09 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat" > > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 *does* *n

RE: Support contact for Extensions

OK, +1 > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 04:28 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Support contact for Extensions > > On 21/08/2016 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> From: An

RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 01:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org; l...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

Also, . The article itself is very straightforward. The comments wander around all over the place with the usual pontifications about corporate influence, etc. An important point is made, by the way, over how it is that LibreOffice deployment is far easier

RE: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO

> -Original Message- > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:30 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO > > On 31/08/2016 16:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > &

RE: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

We all have these questions, Phil. What we are awaiting is someone to provide an actionable answer. There is nothing to do about the FUD (as is already remarked elsewhere on the What would ... thread). That's a waste of energy. What we need is energy put into having an AOO that serves its

RE: Release Manager for 4.2.0?

I don't have a good place to put this, and 4.2.0 may not be the way to consider it, if we are also counting on an early (this year) 4.2.0 to also provide important maintenance fixes and any security catch-ups too. One major change that the TDF made to LibreOffice is very important. Instead of

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

> -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 22:08 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > > > > -Original

RE: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 09:26 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve? > > On 9/2/2016 7:59 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > > OK, counter-point to the other

RE: Presence at ApacheCon Europe, November

I am in the same position as Patricia and will not be traveling to European conferences. > -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 04:21 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Presence at ApacheCon Europe, November >

RE: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

> -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 10:18 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve? > > > > > -Original Message---

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

blic interest as required in its Charter. Being suppressed by worries of outside scrutiny and adversarial articles and responses is not something that should dissuade us. Problems have to be faced bravely and openly. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:d

FW: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

the team really should consider to give some official statements on > the retirement idea, plus show that it is worth joining. Mid and long > term goals are now super important. So more volunteers have reason to > join. > Currently you have managed to get a lot media attention.  use it.

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

point as missing from the list/plan posted by Dennis > E. Hamilton: an easy upgrade path for current OpenOffice users, to make > sure that people aren't inconvenienced and that the efforts OpenOffice > contributors' made for the growth FLOSS aren't wasted. > > Perhaps some of the insta

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 08:23 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > +1 > > I'm here for the present and the future, not the past. >

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

> -Original Message- > From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 21:49 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > > > > > >

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

would be great to have that outcome. > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 1, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Here is what a careful retirement of Apache OpenOffice could look > like. > >

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

eyes and thoughts of our community, as reflected here on dev@. What alternative do you see? > > > Phil > > > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > He

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

> -Original Message- > From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 21:23 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: priv...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long) > > > (3) I think that

RE: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2016 02:09 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve? > > Am 09/04/2016 01:40 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >

RE: Kay's activities

Good, thanks for getting this. The web site effort was extensive. Kay was also the one who, along with Marcus, identify issues as blockers or to have their fixes ear-marked for 4.2.0. She did the same for 4.1.2. So she has done more than watch the bugzilla. - Dennis > -Original

ooo-site "Participation/Help-Wanted" structure (was RE: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?)

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2016 10:34 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve? > > Am 09/04/2016 06:43 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: [ ... ] [o

RE: [PROBLEM] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 13:27 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2- > patch1 Hotfixes > > Am 08/29/2016 04:39 PM, sc

RE: [REPORT] CVE-2016-1513 Security Advisory

1.2-patch1/hotfix.html>. Please review the README instructions before deciding to download and apply the Hotfix. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 09:43 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

software alternatives would arise on users@oo.a.o and particularly on the Community Forums. That would happen naturally without requiring the project to take any positions or provide any kind of exclusivity of one provider over others. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: De

RE: [PROPOSAL] Consolidating all the build guides

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 14:49 > To: dev@ > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Consolidating all the build guides > > As I have now some experience on building OpenOffice, I've also seen > that

RE: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO

on Phipps: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton < > > dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com] > >>> Sent: Wednesd

[NOMINATION REQUEST] Next Chair of AOO Project Management Committee

or offer themselves, indicate their availability to serve for at least one single-year term, and also have their own questions answered. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2016 20:44 > To: dev@openoffic

RE: Updated Security Advisory: CVE-2016-1513 Memory Corruption Vulnerability (Impress Presentations)

Thanks for the feedback, Don. Please provide more details (and copy the public dev@ user list) so we can narrow in on the problem. Which version of Windows 10 are you running? Windows 10 Home or Windows 10 Pro? Are you following the steps in the README file for the Windows 4.1.2-patch1

RE: [REPORT] CVE-2016-1513 Security Advisory

hrough it or not. With regard to your document corruption experience, that is not the behavior associated with the CVE-2016-1513 vulnerability. They were probably damaged in the Save process. That is not unknown. - Dennis > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton &

RE: [E-devel] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 locks in Enlightenment 0.21.99.21605

[BCC to AOO dev list] Please remove dev@openoffice.apache.org from these messages. The discussion seems to have little to do with Apache OpenOffice and there appears to be nothing that the project can contribute with respect to this issue. If that is not the case, please open a bugzilla

RE: Merge with LibreOffice?

> -Original Message- > From: Απόστολος Συρόπουλος [mailto:asyropoulos...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2016 12:36 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: ΑΠ: Merge with LibreOffice? > > > >> Greetings, dear AOO community. > >> > >> Please note first that this message is

RE: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO

l is sound, that leaves us with the question about sustainability of the Apache OpenOffice project itself, and what the consequences of unsustainability are. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

WARNING. The ApacheOpenOffice. Org site described in this exchange is a malicious site. DO NOT INVESTIGATE. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 02:08 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]

RE: Bug#837178: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: All memory and swap is used up until system freezes

s unfortunate and regrettable. It was also inappropriate that the dev@ openoffice.apache.org list was also so abused. I trust we can remove the cross-posting now and Debian developers can return to their important business without t

RE: Bug#837178: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: All memory and swap is used up until system freezes

I don't understand the point of posting this message to dev@oo.a.o, especially with all the details of an apparent Linux problem in conjunction with LibreOffice (but not necessarily caused by LibreOffice). I assume the recommendation of Apache OpenOffice is not as a substitute but to see if

RE: [discussion] Where to talk about Issues?

If you are offering to take action on a specific Issue, do so on the Issue. If you want discussion of a proposal to act, or you want a patch or solution reviewed, do that here on dev@, pointing to the Issue. If you are requesting that someone else do something, here at dev@ is as good a place

RE: Buildbot Notifications

+1 Thanks Gav > -Original Message- > From: Gavin McDonald [mailto:ga...@16degrees.com.au] > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 19:34 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Buildbot Notifications > > Hi All, > > The commits list shows 142 commits so far this month - 98 of which are >

[VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice

[BCC to PMC] RESOLUTION: That Marcus Lange (marcus) be recommended to the Apache Software Foundation Board to serve as Vice President for Apache OpenOffice. The Vice President for Apache OpenOffice serves in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors

[CONCLUSION] [NOMINATION REQUEST] Next Chair of AOO Project Management Committee

dates please speak up now. Then we can start > a discussion. > > Thanks for your attention. > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair > [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles > > Marcus > > > > Am 08/30/2016 10:30 PM, schrieb De

Question: Naming the dev/openoffice/4.1.3 folders

I've been puzzling about the folder names. Let me test my understanding. If all of the dev/openoffice/4.1.3/ files being uploaded become RC1, will it be by renaming the folder (e.g., from 4.1.3 to 4.1.3-rc1) without changing anything in the folders? (The files have the name they will have if

Downloading dev/openoffice/4.1.3 Windows Binaries

filenames will not change. -- Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430 https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail - To unsu

RE: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at Openoffice

[BCC us...@openoffice.apache.org] > -Original Message- > From: James Knott [mailto:james.kn...@rogers.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 05:35 > To: us...@openoffice.apache.org; supp...@formbirds.com > Subject: Re: Request for Nofollow or Removal of Links to My Site at > Openoffice

Windows XP confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381

I successfully installed the 2016-09-23 AOO 4.1.3-dev (r1761381) Win_x86_en-US on Windows XP Professional Version 2002 Service Pack 3 (running in a VirtualBox VM). No VC++ 2008 redistributable installation occurred. I have not checked anything else at this point. -- Dennis E. Hamilton

Windows 10 Anniversary confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381

at this point. -- Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430 https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail - To unsubscribe

RE: {Dicuss] [Vote] Summary

+1 Great analysis and working things out: pats, arielch, marcus. > -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 06:00 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: {Dicuss] [Vote] Summary > > This thread has morphed a bit, and I

RE: [VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 08:36 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice > President for Apache OpenOffic

RE: Become the IMAP client for documents [Re: Differentiate or Die]

> -Original Message- > From: Xen [mailto:l...@xenhideout.nl] > Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:57 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Become the IMAP client for documents [Re: Differentiate or > Die] > > toki schreef op 17-09-2016 17:52: > > On 17/09/2016 10:46, Peter

[RESULT][VOTE] Recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice

[BCC to PMC] The [VOTE] to recommend Marcus Lange (marcus) as the New Vice President for Apache OpenOffice has passed. Tally +1 Jan Høydahl +1 Dennis E. Hamilton +1 Gavin McDonald +1 Herbert Duerr +1 Patricia Shanahan +1 Louis Suárez-Potts +1 Mechtilde Stehmann +1

FW: Resolution to Change the Apache OpenOffice Chair

Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 09:47 > To: bo...@apache.org > Subject: Resolution to Change the Apache OpenOffice Chair > > Already added to the Special Orders: > > C. Change th

RE: Tools for building and checking a release candidate

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 14:37 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Tools for building and checking a release candidate > > On 18/09/2016 Marcus wrote: > > Am 09/17/2016 01:00 PM, schrieb

RE: Tools for building and checking a release candidate

> -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 15:18 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: Tools for building and checking a release candidate > > > > > -Original Message-

RE: Tools for building and checking a release candidate

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 15:59 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Tools for building and checking a release candidate > > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >>

RE: Become the IMAP client for documents [Re: Differentiate or Die]

Minor touch-up about OneDrive and Microsoft Office Web Apps. > -Original Message- > From: Xen [mailto:l...@xenhideout.nl] > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 04:40 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Become the IMAP client for documents [Re: Differentiate or Die] > [ ... ] > -

RE: Access denied on bugzilla ...

Pedro, When you assign an issue to secur...@openoffice.apache.org, it becomes invisible to all but the security team. Since this is not about a vulnerability, I will change the issue to the default assignment. Please do not assign issues to others. If you want to assign it to yourself,

RE: Access denied on bugzilla ...

; it's not wrong that the issue was send to the security team. > > We should think about not rooting these kind of issues to the security > team. > > [1] https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_activity.cgi?id=127117 > > Marcus > > > > Am 09/16/2016 06:43 PM, schrieb

RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

[orcmid] I agree, Dave. Will get around to it. - Dennis > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Sep 7, 2016, at 7:55 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton > <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > > [ ... ] --

RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 15:02 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2- > patch1 Hotfixes > > [BCC PMC, F

RE: Java 32 Redux

There's also a proposal to rework the error messages. I started over a year ago, and was flummoxes on not wanting there to be multiple warnings in the same message (having to do with how exception messages are combined). It would be worth getting back to for 4.2. - Dennis > -Original

[PROBLEM] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

once they are present. Then I will complete this long and winding road with the updated advisory. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 10:28 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: l...@openoffic

RE: FW: Internationalization of 4.1.2-patch1 (was RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat")

[Please cross-post all replies] Two localizations for the 4.1.2-patch1 hotfix are near completion. They are for German (de) and Nederlands (nl) (often "Dutch" in English). It would be very useful to have localizations in French, Italian, and Spanish, preferably by native speakers.

RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

PM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > >> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > > > >> Yes, now I understand. > >> > >> Is it better now? > > > > _imho_ yes. > > I've merged both tables into a single one. Now we have really o

RE: svn commit: r14987 - /dev/openoffice/4.1.2-patch1/hotfix.html

Oh, OK. Seems wordy for me. But +0. I very much don't like the wide gray bar when a simple double-line is good enough. When I update the language entries for Linux, I will remove the gray bar. It is awful. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: mar...@apache.org

RE: [DISCUSS] Release 4.2: General Topics

The problem of incomplete shutdown is very serious. It can result in damaged and completely lost in-progress work, even though apparently saved, and other damage. The whole problem of shutdown, Quickstarter, and failed auto-recovery is a big ball of snakes that is worthy of a maintenance

RE: Windows 10 Anniversary confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381

uninstalling AOO4.1.3-dev and then again installing the 2016-09-29 install, I saw the VC++ redistributables checks go by quickly, but apparently not with any time installing. The AOO part of the installation proceeded successfully. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Ha

RE: Windows XP confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381

to be looking. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 09:53 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Windows XP confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381 > > I successfully install

RE: Which source files in release?

I lost the thread somewhere, and I want to comment on a remark about who signs packages in the release candidates. I think there is a "requirement", or probably just an assumption, that the source package be signed by the Release Manager, so if you want to check the package and then

RE: In regards to Open Office

I think the observation was that ODF was not designed with interoperability with Microsoft in mind. In fact, that case was officially excluded, although the work on OpenFormula in ODF 1.2 was designed to accommodate Excel and had participation of Microsoft experts. The folklore about all of

RE: In regards to Open Office

+1 Rory's point is all that matters. The user wants to know how things will work *now* in choosing between different products. Hypotheticals and speculations about format standards are not useful. (I've worked on both OOXML and ODF specifications and I know from direct knowledge how

RE: Editing the release notes wiki

You usually make a request on doc@ or here on dev@, giving the user name you have on the CWiki, and one of the administrators will give you the karma. I know Keith was doing that for folks who wanted to work on documentation. According to the record we have for such things, Andrea and Dave

RE: Testing 4.1.3

has the developer builds that are being readied. Note that these are only for developers, QA, and consideration as RC1. They are not meant to be placed in general use as there is no 4.1.3 release at this time. - Dennis > -Original

Recap of Board/Reports Actions on OpenOffice

[BCC PMC] I just encountered this accidentally [;<): . This makes it unnecessary to invest any further maintenance at . I will add a note, there, linking to the

RE: Request to join back the PMC

[BCC PMC] This is a personnel matter and Raphael's request should be made to and discussed at priv...@openoffice.apache.org. There are means for reinstating former PMC members and that is to be taken up there. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schmidt

RE: Actual process to make changes on the website

Alternatively, Log onto with your Apache ID and password. Then click the "Publish ooo-site site" link. There is no need for the Perl script and this should work in any current browser. (I just confirmed it with IE 11.) - Dennis > -Original

RE: Bugzilla and Twitter

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 12:40 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton (Apache) <orc...@apache.org> > Subject: Re: Bugzilla and Twitter > > Am 11/10/2016

RE: Need urgent Confluence help

I don't have the karma either. I just deleted the content, declared it to be an orphan page and clobbered the Title. (Titles are mandatory). > -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 09:46 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >

RE: Download Stats

I'm not certain what the point of the aggregate count is, apart from it being a larger number. While pride is taken in it, it is not clear how meaningful it is. The current rate of downloads averages out to around 3 million per month. That was true for 4.1.1 and for 4.1.2. It is likely that

RE: Error on enum statement. Can sombody take a little time and explain the enum and the error?

> -Original Message- > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:legi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2017 17:07 > To: dev > Subject: Error on enum statement. Can sombody take a little time and > explain the enum and the error? > > Hello all, > > > I tried to

RE: SSDLC Compliance - OpenOffice

Comments in-line. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:legi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 01:41 > To: dev ; gan.kokleong.adr...@stee.stengg.com > Subject: Re: SSDLC Compliance - OpenOffice > > As usual I forgot to add people

<    4   5   6   7   8   9