On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
> period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
> of the year we are not.
I think a progress bar would only be useful if there'd be a c
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 13:53:37 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> I have had some very bad experience with SF's servers around year 2001.
> It was slow and buggy. Is that fixed now?
They did some nice updates - I didn't have bad experiences with it for years,
now.
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 09:35:24 steve wrote:
> I can certainly look into it, and i know of some projects to make it
> possible.
Great!
Many thanks!
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 17:48:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> IMHO the above is totally unrealistic.
Does that settle the Progress bar question?
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://i
On Monday, 1. June 2009 13:55:29 sashee wrote:
> We had a policy where I worked for some time, that if a bug is
> inactive for some time, and cannot be reproduced by the developer,
> will be force closed.
I know that from many other projects.
IIRC Gentoo uses "NEEDINFO" for that.
Best wishes,
On Monday, 1. June 2009 17:29:05 steve wrote:
> I looked into doing this with Java to make it cross platform, but since
> most Macs lack java6 right now it is non-trivial, and java6 is where the
> systray class was apparently introduced.
Could this work with the crossplatform GNUstep library
On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
> keep it (although everyone else seems to want to get rid of it). We don't
> have any other need for php afaik, although we need SSL redirects.
How about hosting man
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
> period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
> of the year we are not.
I think a progress bar would only be useful if there'd be a c
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 13:53:37 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> I have had some very bad experience with SF's servers around year 2001.
> It was slow and buggy. Is that fixed now?
They did some nice updates - I didn't have bad experiences with it for years,
now.
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 09:35:24 steve wrote:
> I can certainly look into it, and i know of some projects to make it
> possible.
Great!
Many thanks!
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
On Monday, 1. June 2009 13:55:29 sashee wrote:
> We had a policy where I worked for some time, that if a bug is
> inactive for some time, and cannot be reproduced by the developer,
> will be force closed.
I know that from many other projects.
IIRC Gentoo uses "NEEDINFO" for that.
Best wishes,
On Monday, 1. June 2009 17:29:05 steve wrote:
> I looked into doing this with Java to make it cross platform, but since
> most Macs lack java6 right now it is non-trivial, and java6 is where the
> systray class was apparently introduced.
Could this work with the crossplatform GNUstep library
On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
> keep it (although everyone else seems to want to get rid of it). We don't
> have any other need for php afaik, although we need SSL redirects.
How about hosting man
On Saturday, 30. May 2009 19:41:24 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Emu is constantly segfaulting in php-cgi, this is one reason to want to
> move. It would be partly solved by making it all static.
What exactly is needed?
I have some 2GiB diskspace and unknown bandwidth laying unused (I grabbed a
spe
On Saturday, 30. May 2009 19:41:24 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Emu is constantly segfaulting in php-cgi, this is one reason to want to
> move. It would be partly solved by making it all static.
What exactly is needed?
I have some 2GiB diskspace and unknown bandwidth laying unused (I grabbed a
spe
On Wednesday, 27. May 2009 19:53:01 Evan Daniel wrote:
> I have only very rarely had any difficulty determining whether a
> message was spam or not. Why would this be any different?
>
> Of course Advogato gives you the same ability, that is the entire
> point. The precise algorithm is different,
On Tuesday, 26. May 2009 19:16:14 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2009 17:30:00 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Sunday, 24. May 2009 16:52:00 xor wrote:
> > > Full ACK. Friends page HAS to be separate to encourage users to
> > > establish darknet connec
On Wednesday, 27. May 2009 19:53:01 Evan Daniel wrote:
> I have only very rarely had any difficulty determining whether a
> message was spam or not. Why would this be any different?
>
> Of course Advogato gives you the same ability, that is the entire
> point. The precise algorithm is different,
On Tuesday, 26. May 2009 19:16:14 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2009 17:30:00 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Sunday, 24. May 2009 16:52:00 xor wrote:
> > > Full ACK. Friends page HAS to be separate to encourage users to
> > > establish darknet connec
On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
> way to get feedback from users.
Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface?
Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text "Re
On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote:
> And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
> way to get feedback from users.
Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface?
Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text "Re
On Sunday, 24. May 2009 16:52:00 xor wrote:
> Full ACK. Friends page HAS to be separate to encourage users to establish
> darknet connections. Maybe we should even write something about Freenet
> becoming faster with more friend connections - if that's true?
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 20:03:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Well, no other alert is shown in full at the moment.
>
> Isn't it better to just say "You have 5 messages from friends" ? Or "You
> have 1 new messages from friends" ?
I'm not perfectly sure, but I think it would suffice.
Maybe I react
On Sunday, 24. May 2009 16:52:00 xor wrote:
> Full ACK. Friends page HAS to be separate to encourage users to establish
> darknet connections. Maybe we should even write something about Freenet
> becoming faster with more friend connections - if that's true?
From my experience it is faster - I add
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 20:03:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Well, no other alert is shown in full at the moment.
>
> Isn't it better to just say "You have 5 messages from friends" ? Or "You
> have 1 new messages from friends" ?
I'm not perfectly sure, but I think it would suffice.
Maybe I react
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 16:06:51 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> People will game the system, no? If they think paedophiles are scum who
> should not be allowed to speak, and they realise that clicking "This is
> spam" is more effective than "This is crap", they will click the former,
> no?
Not if the
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 16:06:51 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> People will game the system, no? If they think paedophiles are scum who
> should not be allowed to speak, and they realise that clicking "This is
> spam" is more effective than "This is crap", they will click the former,
> no?
Not if the
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 02:20:23 Cl?ment wrote:
> > > A always seeable (sorry for new words...) button 'Shutdown the node'
> > > and 'Restart the node'
> >
> > You want to encourage people to shut down? IMHO the best way to do that
> > is with a system tray icon.
>
> Hum, in all application you
On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:38:35 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Putting the messages only here is a bad idea. Some of these messages are
> IMPORTANT. What we need to do is: - show the summary on the Browse Freenet
> page and maybe others
> - reduce the number of messages by coalescing them and shifting
On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:10:42 Mike Bush wrote:
> I have been watching this debate an I was wondering whether it could
> help to have 2 sets of trust values for each identity in a trust list,
> this could mean you could mark an identity as spamming or that I don't
> want to see these posts again
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 02:20:23 Clément wrote:
> > > A always seeable (sorry for new words...) button 'Shutdown the node'
> > > and 'Restart the node'
> >
> > You want to encourage people to shut down? IMHO the best way to do that
> > is with a system tray icon.
>
> Hum, in all application you
On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:38:35 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Putting the messages only here is a bad idea. Some of these messages are
> IMPORTANT. What we need to do is: - show the summary on the Browse Freenet
> page and maybe others
> - reduce the number of messages by coalescing them and shifting
On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:10:42 Mike Bush wrote:
> I have been watching this debate an I was wondering whether it could
> help to have 2 sets of trust values for each identity in a trust list,
> this could mean you could mark an identity as spamming or that I don't
> want to see these posts again
On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like
> these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between
> nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is
> purely peer t
On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like
> these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between
> nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is
> purely peer t
On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
>use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this
> idea.
I just added the mailbody as comment :)
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part o
On Monday, 18. May 2009 15:50:30 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a
> useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use
> exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens,
> when the selected br
On Monday, 18. May 2009 15:50:30 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a
> useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use
> exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens,
> when the selected br
On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
>use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this
> idea.
I just added the mailbody as comment :)
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part o
On Sunday, 17. May 2009 00:59:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Not much point hiding it if you're broadcasting the existence of nodes via
> MDNSDiscovery!
...you're right for OpenNet... should have seen that before.
I assume only a full "steganographic announcement" framework could help there
(have
On Saturday, 16. May 2009 16:02:19 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Additionally, Gentoo is about choice, if there is a warning, the user can
> choose, with a forcing script, there is no choice, which is a bad idea for
> this philosophy, therefor i vote against such a script for linux.
But in Gentoo it woul
On Sunday, 17. May 2009 00:59:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Not much point hiding it if you're broadcasting the existence of nodes via
> MDNSDiscovery!
...you're right for OpenNet... should have seen that before.
I assume only a full "steganographic announcement" framework could help there
(have
Hi,
It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for
communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the possibility
that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the
internet).
I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of por
On Saturday, 16. May 2009 16:02:19 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Additionally, Gentoo is about choice, if there is a warning, the user can
> choose, with a forcing script, there is no choice, which is a bad idea for
> this philosophy, therefor i vote against such a script for linux.
But in Gentoo it woul
Hi,
It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for
communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the possibility
that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the
internet).
I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of por
On Friday, 15. May 2009 22:07:34 xor wrote:
> Wouldn't it take much load off the "internet", i.e. small bandwidth
> connections, if any nodes which are connected via LAN used the LAN for
> routing requests if possible?
I assume that it would also help privacy, because then timing analysis and
sim
On Monday, 11. May 2009 21:20:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> The only problem I still have is that keeping the uris in the central
> config file didn't work (all paths in the config file were lowercase while
> the real paths aren't - maybe that's connected to the iss
On Friday, 15. May 2009 22:07:34 xor wrote:
> Wouldn't it take much load off the "internet", i.e. small bandwidth
> connections, if any nodes which are connected via LAN used the LAN for
> routing requests if possible?
I assume that it would also help privacy, because then timing analysis and
sim
On Monday, 11. May 2009 21:20:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> The only problem I still have is that keeping the uris in the central
> config file didn't work (all paths in the config file were lowercase while
> the real paths aren't - maybe that's connected to the iss
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 16:33:29 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Voting not on users but on messages (objects):
Short additional info: You never rate users directly but only check how much
their votes correspond with yours.
If they correspond positively (they vote up what you vote up)
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 16:33:29 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Voting not on users but on messages (objects):
Short additional info: You never rate users directly but only check how much
their votes correspond with yours.
If they correspond positively (they vote up what you vote up)
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some
> background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be
> kept minimal...
That would be great.
As long as it doesn't access its memory ver
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 18:12:52 Robert Hailey wrote:
> On May 12, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> be out in a few days), and hopefully Bloom filter sharing, a new
> >> feature
> >
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 15:03:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Perhaps some form of feedback/ultimatum system? Users who are affected by
> spam from an identity can send proof that the identity is a spammer to the
> users they trust who trust that identity. If the proof is valid, those who
> trust t
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some
> background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be
> kept minimal...
That would be great.
As long as it doesn't access its memory ver
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 18:12:52 Robert Hailey wrote:
> On May 12, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> be out in a few days), and hopefully Bloom filter sharing, a new
> >> feature
> >
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 10:24:52 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> In fms, you can always adjust the MinLocalMessageTrust to get whatever
> message you please to read. -- ya, you may call it censorship..
> but it is the one every reader can opt-out with 2 clicks. --- Even
> if majority abuse the sy
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 15:03:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Perhaps some form of feedback/ultimatum system? Users who are affected by
> spam from an identity can send proof that the identity is a spammer to the
> users they trust who trust that identity. If the proof is valid, those who
> trust t
On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We are currently working on Freenet 0.8, which will be released later this
> year, and will include additional performance improvements, usability work,
> and security improvements, as well as the usual debugging. Features are not
> yet fi
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 10:24:52 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> In fms, you can always adjust the MinLocalMessageTrust to get whatever
> message you please to read. -- ya, you may call it censorship..
> but it is the one every reader can opt-out with 2 clicks. --- Even
> if majority abuse the sy
On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We are currently working on Freenet 0.8, which will be released later this
> year, and will include additional performance improvements, usability work,
> and security improvements, as well as the usual debugging. Features are not
> yet fi
On Monday, 11. May 2009 22:24:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > The mirror of freenet staging worked, too.
> >
> > The initial pull took about an hour, and it succeeded, though I got the
> > log output "GetFailed".
> > Most recent revision was 13919
> > user:Daniel Cheng (???)
> > date:
On Monday, 11. May 2009 22:24:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > The mirror of freenet staging worked, too.
> >
> > The initial pull took about an hour, and it succeeded, though I got the
> > log output "GetFailed".
> > Most recent revision was 13919
> > user:Daniel Cheng (???)
> > date:
Hi,
I just want to provide some feedback on Infocalypse - I hope this is the right
place, since it's an application on freenet.
I tried it a bit and I really like it.
I didn't yet try inserting a big repo, but it works pretty well for the
smaller repositories I tested (which are also availa
Hi,
I just want to provide some feedback on Infocalypse - I hope this is the right
place, since it's an application on freenet.
I tried it a bit and I really like it.
I didn't yet try inserting a big repo, but it works pretty well for the
smaller repositories I tested (which are also availa
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
> that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work really well for memory consumption.
I'd like an option to have
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
> that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work really well for memory consumption.
I'd like an option to have
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
> >
> > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> > games?
&
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
> >
> > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> > games?
&
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
>
> I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
> nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard ports
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
>
> Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in
Gnutella) or with graphics editing or vi
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
>
> I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
> nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard ports
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
>
> Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in
Gnutella) or with graphics editing or vi
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 16:37:25 schrieb bbackde at googlemail.com:
> If you like the command line, ok. But if I can't work with git using
> my prefered IDE,
> then I have a problem. I don't want to change anything just because you
> decided to switch to some SCM that is mostly used by command li
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 16:37:25 schrieb bbac...@googlemail.com:
> If you like the command line, ok. But if I can't work with git using
> my prefered IDE,
> then I have a problem. I don't want to change anything just because you
> decided to switch to some SCM that is mostly used by command line
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 12:38:15 schrieb xor:
> We're in 2009 and graphical IDEs ought to be able to do the revision
> control, if that does not work then the wrong revision control system or
> IDE is being used. It is really not like revision control is something
> new, it has to be possible wit
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 12:38:15 schrieb xor:
> We're in 2009 and graphical IDEs ought to be able to do the revision
> control, if that does not work then the wrong revision control system or
> IDE is being used. It is really not like revision control is something
> new, it has to be possible wit
Am Montag 27 April 2009 17:11:54 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> > whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
Am Montag 27 April 2009 17:11:54 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> > whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> committers.
Could someone comment on this?
It's quite security related, so
Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> committers.
Could someone comment on this?
It's quite security related, so
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 22:05:18 schrieb Robert Hailey:
> > "The Freenet software running on your computer" is probably what I
> > would use to describe what "node" means to non-techy users.
> > Couldn't it just use "Your computer is downloading this page from
> > Freenet", that's what people w
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 22:05:18 schrieb Robert Hailey:
> > "The Freenet software running on your computer" is probably what I
> > would use to describe what "node" means to non-techy users.
> > Couldn't it just use "Your computer is downloading this page from
> > Freenet", that's what people w
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:53:45 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> > all these people?
>
> I think all people I know priva
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 15:16:40 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Arguably nobody ever types CHKs even now, and copy and paste allows for
> fairly long keys. Thoughts?
You know what I think.
The length of the key doesn't matter to me, because freesites already hide
them in links, and otherwise I
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:53:45 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> > all these people?
>
> I think all people I know priva
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 15:16:40 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Arguably nobody ever types CHKs even now, and copy and paste allows for
> fairly long keys. Thoughts?
You know what I think.
The length of the key doesn't matter to me, because freesites already hide
them in links, and otherwise I
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 09:25:15 schrieb xor:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org
> > [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Arne
> > Babenhauserheide
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:14 AM
>
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> block [16:39:31] duplicating the top block can be done with SSKs
> very easily [16:39:40] but with CHKs it requires much longer URIs
> [16:39:43] is that a problem?
> [16:40:04] how much longer?
> [16:40:10] CHK@,, -> CHK@ key 1>,,
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 09:25:15 schrieb xor:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devl-boun...@freenetproject.org
> > [mailto:devl-boun...@freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Arne
> > Babenhauserheide
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:14 AM
> > To: dev
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> block [16:39:31] duplicating the top block can be done with SSKs
> very easily [16:39:40] but with CHKs it requires much longer URIs
> [16:39:43] is that a problem?
> [16:40:04] how much longer?
> [16:40:10] CHK@,, -> CHK@ key 1>,,
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
> to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
> sufficient, and would be client level?
I don't mean announcing to your jabber contac
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
> to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
> sufficient, and would be client level?
I don't mean announcing to your jabber contac
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
> > Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
> >
> > Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
>
> It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you
> are doing with it. And whom you are
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
>
> which
>
> > increases the maintenance cost for toad.
>
> Not sure I follow.
They'd be another interface and someone would have to keep it up to date and
wo
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
> > their closest contacts?
>
> I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> all these people?
I think all people I know privately,
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
> > Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
> >
> > Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
>
> It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you
> are doing with it. And whom you are
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
>
> which
>
> > increases the maintenance cost for toad.
>
> Not sure I follow.
They'd be another interface and someone would have to keep it up to date and
wo
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
> > their closest contacts?
>
> I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> all these people?
I think all people I know privately,
Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
> VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> > Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
> > average 20 people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes
> > from, but if it's some scien
701 - 800 of 818 matches
Mail list logo
