Re: DConf 2020 Early-Bird Registration & Submission Deadlines

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 2:05 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip] > I'll open registration through PayPal once the official > announcement goes out on the blog and social media. Both > registration options will be available at

Re: DCompute - Native heterogeneous computing for D - is here!

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > DCompute is an extension to LDC capable of generating code (with no language > changes*) for NVIDIA's NVPTX for use with CUDA, SPIRV for use with the > OpenCL runtime, and

Re: Android LDC in a Container

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > I haven't actually had a chance to try either this or Joakims's stuff by > itself, although I am interested. Can you describe how this repo simplifies > things?

Re: Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 12:47:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >> As I have previously announced >> (http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am

Re: Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 18:32:48 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> I use arch and D every day. I'm willing to volunteer. I keep up to date >> with all releases and keep

Re: Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

On Wednesday, February 1, 2017, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > As I have previously announced > (http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am > stepping down from maintaining Arch Linux packages for D. > > That means

Re: DIP 1003: remove `body` as a keyword

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Saturday, 10 December 2016 at 13:49:09 UTC, Basile B. wrote: > >> On Monday, 28 November 2016 at 02:17:20 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >>> On 11/24/2016 05:29 PM, WM.H wrote: >>>

Re: Mir Random announce - Professional RNGs

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > https://github.com/libmir/mir-random > http://docs.random.dlang.io/latest/index.html Like the betterC use case. Nice API. first example from the docs: import

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Stefam Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 24 October 2016 at 05:57:42 UTC, Stefam Koch wrote: > >> On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 00:27:50 UTC, Uplink_Coder wrote: >> >>> >>> Little update here: >>> The LLVM

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 19 Oct 2016 17:46, "Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 at 07:11:24 UTC, Nordlöw wrote: >> >> On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 20:47:41 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >>> >>> If all goes well there will be a separate

Re: code-d 0.12.0 - The user friendly release (code-d for noobs)

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:22 PM, WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 07:44:00 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < >>

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 25 September 2016 at 18:21:27 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> >> :D congrats! >> > > I appreciate it. > If all goes well there will be a separate nightly release

Re: code-d 0.12.0 - The user friendly release (code-d for noobs)

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Please, add Sublime support > @WebFreak001: I too am curious as to why you chose to support two obscure editors rather than Sublime as your first supported editors. (Obscure

Re: Diet-NG 1.0.0 released

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Am 24.09.2016 um 15:04 schrieb WebFreak001: > >> On Friday, 23 September 2016 at 11:47:23 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >>> The Diet template language is aimed at providing a

Re: Release candidate vibe.d 0.7.30-rc.1

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Jack Applegame via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 13:44:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > >> >> If no new issues come up, the 0.7.30 release is scheduled for the 9th of >> October. >> >> Please

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 05:06:57 UTC, Nordlöw wrote: > >> On Monday, 19 September 2016 at 10:07:06 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >> >>> Compiling all of phobos does not

Re: mysql-native v0.1.5

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 09/16/2016 02:41 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > >> On 11 Sep 2016 16:57, "Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce"

Re: mysql-native v0.1.5

On 11 Sep 2016 16:57, "Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: >[snip] >... a top priority for mysqln-native at this point. Hi Nick is that a typo or are you working on a completely different library? mysqln-native?

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b5

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 09/14/2016 05:58 AM, Johan Engelen wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 at 12:16:51 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: >> >>> Fifth and hopefully last beta for the 2.071.2

Re: DlangUI 0.9.0: Console backend added

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:11 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 at 13:08:18 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> Screenshots here are what can be done with terminal/ascii: >> http://caca.zoy.org/wiki/libcaca >> > >

Re: DlangUI 0.9.0: Console backend added

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 at 05:58:51 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: > >> Thank you! >> Now dlangui terminal mode supports only 16 colors. >> Some refactoring is required to

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b4

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 09/12/2016 12:47 AM, Martin Nowak wrote: > > > This comes with a different fix for Issue 15907 than 2.071.2-b3. > > Kisses and hugs! :) > > Ali > > +1, this is _way_ better.

Re: DlangUI 0.9.0: Console backend added

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 13 September 2016 at 12:18:19 UTC, Bauss wrote: > >> Good job, but why do people still use tinypic in 2016, when things like >> imgur exist that are a 1000 times

Re: DlangUI 0.9.0: Console backend added

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Vadim Lopatin via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 11:56:11 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > >> On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 11:21:07 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote: >> >>> Now it's possible to build

Re: [OT] LLVM 3.9 released - you can try the release already with LDC!

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Kai Nacke via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 10:51:16 UTC, eugene wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 at 09:42:11 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: >> >>> >>> There are lot of projects using

Re: [OT] LLVM 3.9 released - you can try the release already with LDC!

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:31 AM, eugene via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 8 September 2016 at 20:46:57 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: > >> >> What do YOU do to advocate D? >> >> > What i do to advocate D is nothing, as D is not to be advocated but to

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 8 September 2016 at 10:44:55 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: > >> compiling parts of phobos does no longer crash the new engine. >> However it still produces incorrect

Re: workspace-d 2.7.2 & code-d 0.10.14

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 18:27:41 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 7 September 2016 at 18:14:29 UTC, Suliman wrote: >> >>> You could look my PC with TeamViewer

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > FunctionCall support is done. (with a lot of room for improvement) > you can already return strings. > now I just have to finish string-comparison and string-concat support to >

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:15 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 07:46:30 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > actually, from my PoV solution is supereasy: just remove ALL visibility > restrictions for traits. and i mean all.

Re: [GSoC] Precise GC

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip]. Precisely scanning unions is tricky since they could mix pointer > and non pointer types. [snip] > Can we rather just make a special tagged union that is scanned...

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:47 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 2 September 2016 at 06:27:11 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> Perhaps @system code should just completely ignore privacy? >> > > it is uncontrollable. imagine attribute

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On 02 Sep 2016 07:40, "ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:54:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: >> >> Allowing access to private members has a lot of implications, e.g. breaks lots of optimizations b/c you can't know who

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:26 PM, ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 09/01/2016 11:01 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > >> I'm actually asking why we can't catch the ctfe error. >> > > There is

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:05 PM, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 21:01:46 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> I'm actually asking why we can't catch the ctfe error. >> > > You can, by using __traits(compiles,

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 01 Sep 2016 21:36, "David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 19:27:17 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> So why can't we even catch the Error during CTFE, that would at least help somewhat. > > > You are mixing

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:09 PM, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 16:43:53 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> is that in one of the "semantic" passes the compiler has? >> > > For reference, I've laid out the

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, 1 September 2016 at 13:18:18 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> the _checkCTFE() function is just a function that does something we're not >> allowed to do at CTFE, but

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 22:01:45 UTC, tsbockman wrote: > >> On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 08:39:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >> >>> I just came up with a nifty little patch

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip] > But yes you can circumvent the code-generation and pulling in the druntime > dependency using a static if. > That will be awesome!

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 00:24:01 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: > >> I feel that this can have a positive impact on the whole of dmd, since >> that will allow better

Re: Aedi - a dependency injection library

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Alexandru Ermicioi via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 19:24:22 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> On 16 Aug 2016 20:45, "Alexandru Ermicioi via Digitalmars-d-announce" < >>

Re: Berlin D Meetup August 2016

Man I wish I was in Berlin. Will be awesome if we get to see a video of this. R On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ben Palmer via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > The August Berlin D Meetup will be happening at 20:00 on Friday the 26th > of

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 17 Aug 2016 18:50, "Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Just a small update today. > if(__ctfe) and if(!__ctfe) > now get special treatment. > Also working on getting compiletime-parsers to run. > Nice tease with the "compile time parsers

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > > Or perhaps DIP1000 changes the current behavior of the `scope` storage > class. > > My understanding is that the `scope` storage class currently allocates a > class on the stack

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On 17 Aug 2016 04:00, "Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 01:42:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > >>> Can you please clarify the current implementation `scope`, and what DIP1000 >>> proposes to change with respect to the

Re: Aedi - a dependency injection library

On 16 Aug 2016 20:45, "Alexandru Ermicioi via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 14:25:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >> >> On 2016-08-16 11:41, Alexandru Ermicioi wrote: >> >>> https://github.com/aermicioi/aedi >> >> >> If you

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On 16 Aug 2016 21:01, "Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:55:40 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 18:25:42 UTC, Meta wrote: >>> >>> What about this? >>> >>> struct Rnd >>> { >>> int*

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 08/15/2016 04:54 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > okay nice, so that code would not compile but code such as: > > void test() { >

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 08/15/2016 03:41 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > scope rnd = new Rnd; // reference semantic and stack allocated > > auto rnd2 = r

Re: DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:57 PM, ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 10:27:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote: > >> On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 07:19:00 UTC, lobo wrote: >> >>> When was it deprecated? I use it a lot and DMD

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I took a break from work on string operations and focused instead of > improving the robustness of the engine. > I.E. for it not to halt the compiler on unsupported

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 06 Aug 2016 16:30, "Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Time for an update. > (ASCII)-Strings work reasonably well. > > I am now working on supporting general Sliceing and Appending. > The effort on function calls is also still ongoing. > >

Re: LDC 1.1.0-beta2 has been released!

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Temtaime via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 5 August 2016 at 06:13:54 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Emre Temelkuran via >> Digitalmars-d-announce <

Re: LDC 1.1.0-beta2 has been released!

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Emre Temelkuran via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 3 August 2016 at 20:12:59 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> LDC 1.1.0-beta2, the LLVM-based D compiler, is available for download! >> This BETA

Re: New Diet template engine almost complete, ready for comments

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Chris via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Great stuff! Very much appreciated. Btw, the link to jade-lang.org (don't > click!) leads to a dodgy business homepage atm. The right address is > > http://jade-lang.com/ > Also:

Re: New Diet template engine almost complete, ready for comments

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Sönke Ludwig < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip] > and on Linux the Gold linker should be used for speed, but then it should > be almost as good as a runtime solution. > Note on using Gold on linux. You can use lflags "-fuse-ld=gold", to get

Re: New Diet template engine almost complete, ready for comments

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Sönke Ludwig < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Am 26.07.2016 um 05:22 schrieb Puming: > >> On Monday, 25 July 2016 at 09:29:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >>> The Diet template language is aimed at providing a way to define >>> procedurally

Re: New Diet template engine almost complete, ready for comments

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Puming via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 25 July 2016 at 09:29:38 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > >> The Diet template language is aimed at providing a way to define >> procedurally generated HTML/XML pages (or other

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 15:57:28 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> >> Thanks that would be great, however I think its a while off before it can >> work on your ctfe

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 13:04:33 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < >>

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Sunday, 17 July 2016 at 12:12:17 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> Nice! how are you keeping track of changes? Are you tagging / branching >> each time you get something new

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

Nice! how are you keeping track of changes? Are you tagging / branching each time you get something new working? On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 15 July 2016 at 20:36:46 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: >

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:09 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 at 05:54:48 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: > >> Are you sharing this code >> > > yes. we are chatting with Stefan in IRC, and the repository is public (i > mean,

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:54 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > and just to make sure that my approach is working: bytecode compiler now > compiles simple free functions without args and returning int (yep, there > are some in phobos! ;-), while

Re: daffodil, a D image processing library

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Benjamin Schaaf via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Friday, 1 July 2016 at 01:24:55 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote: > >> On 01/07/2016 9:35 AM, Benjamin Schaaf wrote: >> >>> daffodil is a image processing library inspired by

Re: Button: A fast, correct, and elegantly simple build system.

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Jason White via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 20 June 2016 at 08:21:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote: > >> On Monday, 20 June 2016 at 02:46:13 UTC, Jason White wrote: >> >>> This actually sounds nice. Main problem that

Re: Button: A fast, correct, and elegantly simple build system.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 20 June 2016 at 02:46:13 UTC, Jason White wrote: > >> This actually sounds nice. Main problem that comes to my mind is that >>> there is no cross-platform shell script.

Re: pure D JPEG decoder, with progressive JPEG support, public domain

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:35 PM, John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 17 June 2016 at 13:05:47 UTC, ketmar wrote: > >> finally, the thing you all waited for years is here! pure D no-frills >> JPEG decoder with progressive JPEG support!

Re: Work in Amsterdam

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote: > On 06/13/2016 04:48 PM, Walter Bright wrote: >> >> On 6/13/2016 4:00 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote: >>> >>> On 06/13/2016 03:45 PM, Márcio Martins wrote: Forgive me if this is not the best place for this

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

ory. I currently have to use > 0.9.24. > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sönke Ludwig > <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: >> Am 10.06.2016 um 10:02 schrieb Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce: >>> >>> I made a version that ignores c

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Rory McGuire wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: >> On 6/9/16 4:37 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >>> >>> Am 09.06.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Steven

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On 6/9/16 4:37 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >> Am 09.06.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Steven Schveighoffer: >>> >>> On 6/8/16 2:45 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >>> (...)

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

I made a little parser, it doesn't handle nested + comments (just needs a depth check). https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/871 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: > regex version pull request: > https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/869 > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

regex version pull request: https://github.com/dlang/dub/pull/869 On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Rory McGuire wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Sönke Ludwig > wrote: >> Am 08.06.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Jacob Carlborg: >>> >>> On

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > Am 08.06.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Jacob Carlborg: >> >> On 2016-06-07 20:42, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> >>> No, it has to be the "+" variant (the first /+ +/ comment is evaluated). >> >> >> That's unfortunate. >

Re: Beta release DUB 1.0.0-beta.1

On 07 Jun 2016 11:56, "Sönke Ludwig" wrote: > > DUB 1.0.0 is nearing completion. The new feature over 0.9.25 is support for single-file packages, which can be used to write shebang-style scripts on Posix systems: > > #!/usr/bin/env dub > /++ dub.sdl:

Re: The Official D Blog is Live

On 03 Jun 2016 22:35, "Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 19:33:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: >> >> The D Blog was born at DConf this year. With help from Jack Stouffer, it is now live at: >> >> http://dlang.org/blog/

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:58 AM, tsbockman via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Friday, 3 June 2016 at 06:37:59 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> This dpaste shows a couple of issues with combining chars in D. >> >> https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/4b006959c5c0 >> >> The

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:16 AM, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 21:33:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >> >> Should I assume some normalization occurred on the way? >> > > I'm just looking over std.uni's section on

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On 18 May 2016 1:25 PM, "Bill Hicks via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 at 09:34:53 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> >> As a South African, I can only say that you are talking nonsense regarding the horse/zebra joke. If you've been

Re: D's Auto Decoding and You

On 17 May 2016 16:21, "Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On 5/17/16 10:06 AM, Jack Stouffer wrote: >> >> http://jackstouffer.com/blog/d_auto_decoding_and_you.html >> >> Based on the recent thread in General, I wrote this blog post

Re: My ACCU 2016 keynote video available online

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Bill Hicks via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 13:46:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > >> Uses D for examples, showcases Design by Introspection, and rediscovers a >> fast partition routine. It

Re: To all DConf speakers: please upload slides!

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On 5/12/16 4:13 PM, Seb wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 11 May 2016 at 09:17:54 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >> >>> To do the editing of HD videos we need presentation slides which

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > I was listening to a discussion Don and Daniel had about the current > implementation of CTFE. They talked about using a byte code interpreter. > Even implementing a really

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 09 May 2016 19:01, "Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > I have been looking into the DMD now to see what I can do about CTFE. > Unfortunately It is a pretty big mess to untangle. > Code responsible for CTFE is in at least 3

Re: LDC 1.0.0-beta1 has been released! Please help testing!

>From the github issue it appears it was just a issue with the build script. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Guillaume Chatelet via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Monday, 25 April 2016 at 06:42:02 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> LDC

Re: It's alive! D building D building D, all on Android

On 08 May 2016 02:21, "Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, 7 May 2016 at 09:58:14 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote: >> >> Fantastic news! >> >> I hope we can find a good way to integrate automated testing of github branches/PRs for Android. >

Re: Proposed: start DConf days one hour later

On 28 Apr 2016 6:30 AM, "Mithun Hunsur via Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 03:44:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >>> >>> The folks at Sociomantic

Re: Ddb needs a maintainer

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > This code compile and run: > > try { >auto result = cmd.executeQuery; > >foreach (row; result) >{ > writeln(row[0]); >

Re: Ddb needs a maintainer

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Monday, 15 February 2016 at 22:50:56 UTC, Piotr Szturmaj wrote: > >> On 2016-02-14 20:48, Eugene Wissner wrote: >> >>> I think may be we should discuss if we can/should change

Re: Release D 2.071.0

Here is the exact link I used. It is the source and binaries together. http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.071.0/dmd.2.071.0.linux.tar.xz On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Cy Schubert via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Wednesday, 6 April 2016 at

Re: Release D 2.071.0

.tar.xz works and its much smaller On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Cy Schubert via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 22:43:05 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: >> >> Glad to announce D 2.071.0. >> >> http://dlang.org/download.html >> >> This

Re: Beta D 2.071.0-b2

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 1:59 PM, tost via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 30 March 2016 at 11:03:51 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: > >> Second beta for the 2.071.0 release. >> >> http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta >>

Re: code-debug 0.6.0 released (GDB & LLDB for vscode)

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > On 6 March 2016 at 21:25, WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce > wrote: > > I just released version 0.6.0 of my debug extension for visual

Re: Dconf gets a new logo

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Bill Baxter via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > The other one was classy, but this one is energetic and fun. +1. > > --bb > > +1 for fun

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:14:08 +0200, Rory McGuire via > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > > > If you don't get a cease and desist letter from the D

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On Sunday, 31 January 2016 at 11:14:08 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: >> >> If you don't get a cease and desist letter from the D Foundation soon I'd >> be surprised. > > >

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 10:03:25 +0200, Rory McGuire via > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > >> The problem is the D logo etc at the top of his docs mixed with

Re: Better docs for D (WIP)

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > Just want to update y'all that my better docs continue to improve with > each passing week. > > I just did a style facelift on the members section: > >

  1   2   >