On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 21:41:13 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 8/23/14, 3:33 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/22/14, 10:05 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As I'm sure has been mentioned elsewhere, the website changes
should be
part of the release process, not an afterthought.
Agreed. Who
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 08:23:39 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
It works for ddmd's array.d/array.h at least, although it's not
very maintenance friendly. I assume you're aiming for
something like a 'core.stdcpp.vector' with an implementation to
match each stl implementation?
What's the
Walter Bright wrote in message news:lt7tan$24ei$1...@digitalmars.com...
1. I hate writing documentation. I really really hate it.
Join the club :-)
=)
Sorry you got to be the pioneer with the arrows in your back, but you've
paved the way for the rest of us.
I don't really mind, for
Kagamin wrote in message news:ujtkjzyvjhtvmcvjh...@forum.dlang.org...
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 08:18:18 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
2. These features are rather difficult to use, and I don't want people
to think they can just plug-and-play. I've spent a lot of time fighting
compiler
Jonathan M Davis wrote in message
news:fxdqpmfcbskvtcafz...@forum.dlang.org...
LOL. Yeah, well, it would be ni going to support C+ce if we could get an
actual list of the C++ features that D currently supports somewhere (and
how to use them if it's not obvious). You've been doing so much
Walter Bright wrote in message news:lt5l3k$2s5t$1...@digitalmars.com...
The thing is, while the code was there, there wasn't a single test case
for it in the test suite. Furthermore, at least for Elf, there was no
support for the special mangling done for ::std:: stuff.
Yeah, I don't know
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 20:49:48 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
It would be nice to have a page to link to when questions come
up on Reddit about compatibility with C++.
We have this:
http://dlang.org/cpp_interface.html
From what I understand, it's not complete. For example it says
that
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/905593426121006
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 08:23:16 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 20:49:48 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
It would be nice to have a page to link to when questions come
up on Reddit about compatibility with C++.
We have this:
http://dlang.org/cpp_interface.html
From what I
On 8/22/14, 2:06 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
On 8/22/2014 1:23 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Walter Bright wrote in message news:lt5l3k$2s5t$1...@digitalmars.com...
The thing is, while the code was there, there wasn't a single test case for it
in the test suite. Furthermore, at least for Elf, there was no support for the
special mangling done
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 14:36:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/22/14, 2:06 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
On 8/22/2014 1:18 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
There are two reason it's not better documented:
1. I hate writing documentation. I really really hate it.
Join the club :-)
2. These features are rather difficult to use, and I don't want people to think
they can just plug-and-play. I've spent a
On 8/22/14, 10:04 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/22/2014 1:23 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
I assume you're aiming for something like a 'core.stdcpp.vector' with
an implementation to match each stl implementation?
Yes. While it'll be a significant effort to do this, it could be a big
win for us.
On 8/22/14, 10:05 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As I'm sure has been mentioned elsewhere, the website changes should be
part of the release process, not an afterthought.
Agreed. Who would like to volunteer being our webmaster? We'll discuss
with our admin to give push rights. -- Andrei
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 17:06:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/22/2014 1:18 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
There are two reason it's not better documented:
1. I hate writing documentation. I really really hate it.
Join the club :-)
2. These features are rather difficult to use, and I don't
On 8/22/2014 11:33 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 8/22/14, 10:05 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As I'm sure has been mentioned elsewhere, the website changes should be
part of the release process, not an afterthought.
Agreed. Who would like to volunteer being our
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 08:18:18 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
2. These features are rather difficult to use, and I don't want
people to think they can just plug-and-play. I've spent a lot
of time fighting compiler alignment bugs, which are their own
special kind of hell. Many of those
On 8/23/14, 3:33 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/22/14, 10:05 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As I'm sure has been mentioned elsewhere, the website changes should be
part of the release process, not an afterthought.
Agreed. Who would like to volunteer being our webmaster? We'll discuss
with our
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 01:30:52 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:18:09 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
What is it that we could help with? -- Andrei
he's drama queen, he doesn't need
On 20/08/14 18:57, Brad Anderson wrote:
Anything specific you have problems with? Syntax changes aren't all that
common these days
Support for C++ namespaces where just released and support for C++
templates will most likely end up in master soon.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Jacob Carlborg wrote in message news:lt43pj$ral$1...@digitalmars.com...
Support for C++ namespaces where just released and support for C++
templates will most likely end up in master soon.
Support for C++ templates was in the last release, and the new pull request
is only for special
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 16:25:04 UTC, disapointed user
wrote:
too bad that i wasted my time for such a long time. i post a
link to that thread with your answer to everywhere i can, so
that others won't waste their time too.
anyway good luck in the future for you linux guys.
Well,
On 21/08/14 12:10, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Support for C++ templates was in the last release, and the new pull
request is only for special mangling of some stl declarations.
You see, I get confused of all the syntax changes ;)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 15:20:49 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote in message
news:lt50m0$20f0$1...@digitalmars.com...
Support for C++ templates was in the last release, and the
new pull
request is only for special mangling of some stl
declarations.
You see, I get
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 08:14:41 UTC, novice2 wrote:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Version D 2.066 August 18, 2014
...
Phobos enhancements
1.Bugzilla 3780: getopt improvements by Igor Lesik
Sorry, i can't find this improvements nor in getopt.d nor in
On 8/21/2014 11:54 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
LOL. Yeah, well, it would be ni going to support C+ce if we could get an actual
list of the C++ features that D currently supports somewhere (and how to use
them if it's not obvious). You've been doing so much great work on that that I
have no clue
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 20:33:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/21/2014 11:54 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
LOL. Yeah, well, it would be ni going to support C+ce if we
could get an actual
list of the C++ features that D currently supports somewhere
(and how to use
them if it's not
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 20:43:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, 21 August 2014 at 20:33:56 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/21/2014 11:54 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
LOL. Yeah, well, it would be ni going to support C+ce if we
could get an actual
list of the C++ features that D
On 20/08/14 03:41, Andrew Edwards wrote:
That was my doing... I am preparing myself for the next go around. The
actual branch will be created on Sunday (24 Aug) for a Monday (0900 PDT)
announcement. The beta cycle will run eight weeks following that. On the
fourth week (22 Sept) I will
On 20 August 2014 02:41, Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 8/19/14, 1:26 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/18/14, 5:23 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right
thank you general for your selfish and user considered release.
the lieutenants probably feel kind of really taken care of - as
well as D users.
how do you test and release at facebook.
i am a user that considers to leave after many years. i am
starting to dislike the language, as it is
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:07:27 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
i myself using dmd-git-head and heavily ;-) patched gdc, but
when i
tried to convince my co-workers to use D, they looked at the
page with
releases first. not feature list or some comparisons. neither to
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:19:37 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Can't it be addressed by publishing release schedule, like llvm
does it, to indicate the work is going on?
hm. sounds reasonable. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:15:53 +
disapointed user via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
support for windows that really sucks.
that is 'cause windows really sucks.
good luck in the future for all you guys
you too.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
too bad that i wasted my time for such a long time. i post a link
to that thread with your answer to everywhere i can, so that
others won't waste their time too.
anyway good luck in the future for you linux guys.
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 09:37:24 UTC, ketmar via
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 09:15:54 UTC, disapointed user
wrote:
thank you general for your selfish and user considered release.
the lieutenants probably feel kind of really taken care of - as
well as D users.
how do you test and release at facebook.
i am a user that considers to leave
On 8/19/14, 7:28 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 11:12:25 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
[...]
In essence, it was always this big, just you never saw it because it
got downloaded during the installation process.
It was also significantly bigger before because the download
On 8/19/14, 5:14 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Actually you can believe it. I am the one that called for the release
and it pay ZERO attention to those two languages with the mild exception
that when I have time I crack open a Java book to try to learn a little
programming.
Yah, to amend my
On 8/20/14, 2:15 AM, disapointed user wrote:
thank you general for your selfish and user considered release.
the lieutenants probably feel kind of really taken care of - as well as
D users.
how do you test and release at facebook.
i am a user that considers to leave after many years. i am
On 8/19/14, 4:38 PM, safety0ff wrote:
I find it hard to believe that it is just a coincidence that a surprise
release occurred on the same day as Java 9 and C++14 announcements.
For my part I had no idea, and the exact announcement time was solely up
to me. -- Andrei
On 8/19/14, 6:41 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 8/19/14, 1:26 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/18/14, 5:23 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
Well
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 09:15:54 UTC, disapointed user
wrote:
the the syntax getting ever weirder, less mainstream and a
While I agree with some of your remarks (particularily, the fact
that it becomes too scripting language) ... where to go?
I don't like Go (syntax, mainly). The
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 22:00:58 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 09:15:54 UTC, disapointed user
wrote:
the the syntax getting ever weirder, less mainstream and a
While I agree with some of your remarks (particularily, the
fact that it becomes too scripting
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 22:00:58 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 09:15:54 UTC, disapointed user
wrote:
the the syntax getting ever weirder, less mainstream and a
While I agree with some of your remarks (particularily, the
fact that it becomes too scripting
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:18:09 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
What is it that we could help with? -- Andrei
he's drama queen, he doesn't need any help, only attention.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:00:57 +
eles via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
wrote:
I don't like Go (syntax, mainly). The sole contender in the
C++-like family, for systems programming, would be Vala, but
since they dropped the posix profile... :(
language without
I remember that it was planned to add functional future for
iteration throw elements. Something like:
().times
().do
But I can't find original post about it and nothing related in
changelogs...
On 18/08/14 21:00, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/905593426121006
On 18/08/14 22:43, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I agree, I am also surprised that 2.066 was released despite the
regressions.
Same here.
How is it decided when it's time to cut off a new release? Do we have
two RCs and that's it?
It seems Andrei/Walter is very stressed to get the release
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 05:03:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 04:26:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Well that's what happened - someone started 2.067. What's the
advantage of doing this? Now we need to worry about master and
2.067 instead of just master.
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Version D 2.066 August 18, 2014
...
Phobos enhancements
1.Bugzilla 3780: getopt improvements by Igor Lesik
Sorry, i can't find this improvements nor in getopt.d nor in
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_getopt.html.
Is this announce prematurely, and that this
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/905593426121006
On 8/19/14, 7:42 PM, KrzaQ wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
On 19/08/2014 08:21, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Did someone finish the changelog?
One thing missing is a Note on compiler conversions for unique
expressions, like:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2109/files#diff-0baf0d34bf308dc66e131c0e56e4239bR761
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:47:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/18/2014 12:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 05:24:56 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
publication it's on LOR?
Send me an e-mail if you need any help
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 17:17:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 05:24:56 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
publication it's on LOR?
Send me an e-mail if you need any help
Thanks user Lodin already did hight quality
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 17:51:51 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 17:17:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 05:24:56 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
publication it's on LOR?
Send me an e-mail if you need
I remember merging this one :
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1965 ,
but it was after 2.066 branch has been created. There is also
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2024 but
it is still in progress. I can't remember any other similar PR
- probably it
On 8/19/14, 7:01 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:47:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/18/2014 12:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 21:13:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Walter, now that release is out can you please state your
opinion about
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3651 ? It
is blocking
Phobos module split and decoupling.
LGTM. Any opposition to merging? --
On 8/19/14, 3:09 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 21:13:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter, now that release is out can you please state your opinion about
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3651 ? It is blocking
Phobos module split and decoupling.
LGTM.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:27:34 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
I think it would be great to motivate the change properly. -- Andrei
aren't it motivated enough in PR? this will allow to build real package
hierarchies instead of
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:18:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and
declare it yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what point-releases are for, though?
I agree, I think
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 22:27:28 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/19/14, 3:09 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 21:13:53 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter, now that release is out can you please state your
opinion about
On 8/20/14, 8:38 AM, safety0ff wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:18:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it
yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 00:14:59 UTC, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
On 8/20/14, 8:38 AM, safety0ff wrote:
I agree, I think 2.066.next should be the focus considering
the known
issues of 2.066.
Fear not, point releases will address known deficiencies.
Btw, thank you for the good work
On 8/19/14, 1:26 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/18/14, 5:23 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
Well that's what happened - someone started 2.067.
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 11:12:25 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
[...]
In essence, it was always this big, just you never saw it
because it got downloaded during the installation process.
It was also significantly bigger before because the download it
did was the 30MB dmd zip that contained
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:41:29 +0900
Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
btw. http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing contains bug #10928 as
blocker, but it's marked as RESOLVED FIXED in bugzilla. and bug
#12696 needs to be rechecked, as it seems to be
I have a mixed feelings about this release. It has some really
cool features and is good to finally see live. But it has taken
ages and there are still many open regressions
(http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing). And stuff like
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11946 is just small
On 8/18/2014 12:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/905593426121006
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Support for new flag -vcolumns in Emacs FlyCheck is soon about to
follow:
https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck/issues/460
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:23:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have a mixed feelings about this release. It has some really
cool features and is good to finally see live. But it has taken
ages and there are still many open regressions
(http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing). And stuff like
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 20:43:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:23:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have a mixed feelings about this release. It has some really
cool features and is good to finally see live. But it has
taken ages and there are still many open
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:23:14 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I don't know if we can do anything better about it.
2.067
Vladimir Panteleev:
I agree, I am also surprised that 2.066 was released despite
the regressions.
There is an apparently endless stream of regressions, I have
found another today
(https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 ). I think D is
not yet at the stage of its development where
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 21:57:19 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev:
I agree, I am also surprised that 2.066 was released despite
the regressions.
There is an apparently endless stream of regressions, I have
found another today
(https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 ).
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:01:24 +
bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
What's the advantage of this over maintaing packages for the RC
version until it's ready?
'cause not releasing periodically means ah, it will never be ready!
let's look at another
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 22:20:19 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:01:24 +
bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
What's the advantage of this over maintaing packages for the RC
version until it's ready?
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:48:00 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
I don't see how infrequent, stable releases are more likely to
provoke that reaction than frequent, unstable releases.
stability is something that cannot be achieved in
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 21:57:19 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev:
I agree, I am also surprised that 2.066 was released despite
the regressions.
There is an apparently endless stream of regressions, I have
found another today
(https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13321 ).
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare
it yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what point-releases are for, though?
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:18:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and
declare it yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what point-releases are for, though?
Why can't we have
On 8/18/2014 7:07 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:48:00 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
I don't see how infrequent, stable releases are more likely to
provoke that reaction than frequent,
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 00:23:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and
declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
Regardless of whether we start another release going that quickly
or not,
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:22:08 -0400
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Well, people will invent *any* excuse to pass over anything they
don't feel like bothering with. It sounds like that's probably what
they were doing.
not exactly, 'cause
Hmm, list of bug fixes in dlang.org/changelog.html contains bugs
that have been fixed but yet pushed into 2.066 branch.
On 8/18/14, 5:23 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
Well that's what happened - someone started 2.067. What's the advantage
of doing this? Now we need
On Tuesday, 19 August 2014 at 04:26:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Well that's what happened - someone started 2.067. What's the
advantage of doing this? Now we need to worry about master and
2.067 instead of just master. -- Andrei
Well, what you do at that point is just fix all of the
Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
publication it's on LOR?
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:24:54 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
publication it's on LOR?
DYI.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:24:54 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
publication it's on LOR?
sorry, i mean DIY. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
95 matches
Mail list logo
