Long Life – Reversed in Creation
https://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2016/06/long-life-reversed-in-creation.html
> On 09-Jan-2024, at 11:22 AM, LizR wrote:
>
> If you're always truthful, this post makes you immortal.
>
>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 09:09, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> One year
If you're always truthful, this post makes you immortal.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 09:09, John Clark wrote:
>
> One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
> word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
>
> One year ago I sent
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
paranormal prediction for the next
year
Dhu al Qarnayn visited the Polar Regions?
https://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2014/06/dhu-al-qarnayn-polar-regions-of-earth.html
On 03-Jan-2023, at 11:23 PM, John Clark wrote:
Who gives a damn what the Quran asks us to do? The people who wrote
Dhu al Qarnayn visited the Polar Regions?
https://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2014/06/dhu-al-qarnayn-polar-regions-of-earth.html
> On 03-Jan-2023, at 11:23 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
> Who gives a damn what the Quran asks us to do? The people who wrote it didn't
> even know where the sun
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 11:21 PM Samiya Illias
wrote:
> *The Quran asks us to* [...blah blah blah]
Who gives a damn what the Quran asks us to do? The people who wrote it
didn't even know where the sun went at night.
John K ClarkSee what's on my new list at Extropolis
The Mighty Ancients!
Abstract
The Earth is dotted with ancient ruins.The Quran asks us to take heed from
these ruins, as those civilisations were ‘greater in strength and in impression
on the land’. This study explores what the Quran states about the ancients, as
well as lists the discoveries
-
From: Philip Benjamin
To: Everything List
Sent: Mon, Jan 2, 2023 10:59 am
Subject: RE: [Consciousness-Online] RE: A paranormal prediction for the next
year
[Philip Benjamin] These questions are irrelevant to
WAMP-the-Ingrate!! Questions:
- Who, what where,
...@hotmail.com; everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Consciousness-Online] RE: A paranormal prediction for the next
year
Ok, just to be clear you are indicating that pure, Christianity started with
The Protestant Reformation? So, is Martin Luther the founder of The Church, or
Henry the 8th
are, it is what one can
produce in real life?
-Original Message-
From: Philip Benjamin
To: Everything List
Sent: Fri, Dec 30, 2022 3:13 pm
Subject: RE: [Consciousness-Online] RE: A paranormal prediction for the next
year
[Philip Benjamin] . Nothing
pertinent. What is relevant here
. Nothing to do with unregenerated
“conscious” states. And so many ordinary peoples besides.
Philip Benjamin
Friday, December 30, 2022 11:00 AM
To: medinucl...@hotmail.com; everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Consciousness-Online] RE: A paranormal prediction for the next
year
spudboy100
thing List
Sent: Fri, Dec 30, 2022 10:54 am
Subject: RE: [Consciousness-Online] RE: A paranormal prediction for the next
year
general_the...@googlegroups.com Subject: RE:
[Consciousness-Online] RE: A paranormal prediction for the next year [Philip
Benjamin] I remember a high elec
general_the...@googlegroups.com<mailto:general_the...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Consciousness-Online] RE: A paranormal prediction for the next
year
[Philip Benjamin]
I remember a high elected member of the federal government who was very
conservative with respect to classical
illary-clinton-referred-satanic-occult-high-priestess/
Hillary Clinton Referred to as Satanic, Occult High Priestess
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 12:34 PM
To: 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
Subject: A paranor
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
On 27-12-2020 12:15, John Clark wrote:
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change
one word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change
one word. One year from now
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1220538/world-war-3-us-army-telepathy-helmet-communicate-silence-combat-sptHappy
New Year! Bwah hah hah hah !!
٩(^‿^)۶
-Original Message-
From: John Clark
To: everything-list
Sent: Sun, Dec 29, 2019 11:54 am
Subject: A paranormal prediction
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
Muhammeddonetoldme? He must have listened to Muhammad's Radio (Warren Zevon).
-Original Message-
From: John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com>
To: everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wed, Dec 30, 2015 1:30 pm
Subject: A paranormal prediction for t
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one word.
One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change
one word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
On 12 Jan 2015, at 23:07, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/2/2015 2:45 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Define telepathy, telekinesis, and remote viewing.
No.
On 1/2/2015 2:45 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
mailto:johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Define telepathy, telekinesis, and
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 10:03:25 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 Bruno Marchal mar...@ulb.ac.be javascript: wrote:
By your post, it seems you do not believe in a primary biological
reality or even a chemical universe.
I don't know, give me some examples of a primary
On 04 Jan 2015, at 05:33, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Are only 0, s(0), s(s(0)), ... primary? or should we also insist
that addition and multiplication are primary.
You tell me, you're the one who asked Do you believe in a
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
By your post, it seems you do not believe in a primary biological reality
or even a chemical universe.
I don't know, give me some examples of a primary biological reality and
a chemical universe and I'll be able to tell you if I
On 02 Jan 2015, at 21:40, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Define telepathy, telekinesis, and remote viewing.
No. Buy a dictionary, if you're still confused after that I'll try
to help you out but first you'll need to define
On 03 Jan 2015, at 05:23, Jason Resch wrote:
The selective replies to my post tells me all I need to know.
Good point. John Clark systematically ignores the arguments, and his
strategy consists in mocking excerpts taken out of context.
Bruno
Jason
On Friday, January 2, 2015, John
Thanks Kim!
On 03 Jan 2015, at 01:14, Kim Jones wrote:
A brilliant passage by Bruno recently - may have been rendered a bit
more clearly by the following redaction:
Well, I have discussed this on FB in different groups. I got
confirmation that strong atheists always use insults, jokes
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Are only nouns part of the physical universe or are adjectives and
adverbs part of it too?
It is not quite relevant.
Not quite relevant?! Is fast and a racing car both part of the physical
universe? Is a brain and a
On 01 Jan 2015, at 17:31, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
It cannot happen, because if it happens you will say that it is no
more parapsy.
I most certainly will not say that! I'm not talking about finding
evidence to explain how the
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Define telepathy, telekinesis, and remote viewing.
No. Buy a dictionary, if you're still confused after that I'll try to help
you out but first
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Define telepathy, telekinesis, and remote viewing.
No. Buy a dictionary, if you're still confused after that I'll try to help
you out but first you'll need to define define.
So we don't have a bet,
I can't say I'm
A brilliant passage by Bruno recently - may have been rendered a bit more
clearly by the following redaction:
Well, I have discussed this on FB in different groups. I got confirmation that
strong atheists always use insults, jokes and mockery instead of arguing
something of substance. Not
The selective replies to my post tells me all I need to know.
Jason
On Friday, January 2, 2015, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
So we don't have a bet,
I can't say I'm surprised, I've been offering this bet
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
So we don't have a bet,
I can't say I'm surprised, I've been offering this bet at the
beginning of the year for over a decade but even the staunchest believer in
the paranormal always chickens out when asked to put
On 31 Dec 2014, at 17:42, John Clark wrote:
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change
one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change
one
word. One
, 2014 11:42 am
Subject: A paranormal prediction for the next year
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
It cannot happen, because if it happens you will say that it is no more
parapsy.
I most certainly will not say that! I'm not talking about finding evidence
to explain how the paranormal works I'm talking about something more basic,
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Dec 31, 2014 11:42 am
Subject: A paranormal prediction for the next year
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again
On 2 January 2015 at 05:42, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 , LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
You clearly have psychic powers, Mr Clark! Being able to reliably
predict that no accidents or illnesses or anything else will prevent you
from making the same prediction
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 , LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
You clearly have psychic powers, Mr Clark! Being able to reliably predict
that no accidents or illnesses or anything else will prevent you from
making the same prediction a year from now
I made no such prediction. I said I had the
Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Dec 31, 2014 11:42 am
Subject: A paranormal prediction for the next year
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
If the journals were honest, they would review the papers seriously
according to their data and results,
So you think the reason the journals Science, Nature and Physical Review
Letters don't publish ESP stuff has all
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet
Yes, I think we are all sufficiently aware of how bereft of the ravages of
imagination you are. Take a bow. You need the adulation, clearly.
Kim Jones
On 1 Jan 2015, at 3:42 am, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
You clearly have psychic powers, Mr Clark! Being able to reliably predict
that no accidents or illnesses or anything else will prevent you from
making the same prediction a year from now - and since the prediction you
intend to make is identical, it will include the same pediction for the
year
I predict John Clark will make this prediction again exactly one year from now
unless his computer develops arms and throttles him before he can do it. I also
predict that some one will tell me that this has already happened in universes
with perhaps exceedingly low measure.
For the rest of
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
I have been a member of the Extropian List for many years and at the
beginning of the year it is my habit to send a message to that list
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 5:01 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same message yet again.
I have been a member of the Extropian List for many years and
AH, but last year there was one less heading on your message!
Have happy (and pedantic) new year :-)
On 1 January 2014 05:01, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
One year ago I sent the following post to the list, I did not change one
word. One year from now I intend to send this same
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 8:47:14 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is
the long way around.
No, it's harder because you can tell when you've failed.
Brent
It's not hard for me
On Sunday, January 6, 2013 1:24:48 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
Even people who have no sense of humor can deduce that other people do
have it,
Would they if only 0.001% of the population had a sense of humor?
On 06 Jan 2013, at 02:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that
it is the long way around.
No, it's harder because you can tell when you've failed.
I guess you meant it's harder because you CAN'T
On 1/8/2013 6:36 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 8:47:14 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is
the long
way around.
No, it's harder because you can
On 1/8/2013 9:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Jan 2013, at 02:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is the long way
around.
No, it's harder because you can tell when you've failed.
I guess
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
unlike psi it would be easily repeatable, if one person who claimed to
have a sense of humor laughed and said that was a very good joke it is
statistically very likely (although not certain) that another person who
also
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 12:37:47 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/8/2013 6:36 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 8:47:14 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 1:27:20 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
unlike psi it would be easily repeatable, if one person who claimed to
have a sense of humor laughed and said that was a very good joke it is
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Even people who have no sense of humor can deduce that other people do
have it,
Would they if only 0.001% of the population had a sense of humor?
Yes, because unlike psi it would be easily repeatable, if one person who
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
That's like betting that the Catholic Church won't make Martin Luther a
saint again this year.
I don't see the analogy. The Catholic Church, like all religions, claims to
have all the answers and the last thing they'd want is to
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 11:05:24 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
That's like betting that the Catholic Church won't make Martin Luther a
saint again this year.
I don't see the analogy.
I'm not surprised.
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 4:28:30 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
You mean that physicists have been given 10 billion dollars to spend on
particle accelerators (and comfortable salaries as well, among
On 1/5/2013 5:39 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
The easy problem is harder than the hard problem in the sense that it is the long way
around.
No, it's harder because you can tell when you've failed.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
So how ever many years ago you there confident that CERN would discover
the Higgs?
About 15, and in not one of those 15 years would I have confidently
predicted that nothing new about the Higgs would be discovered in the next
On Friday, January 4, 2013 12:48:19 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 Stephen P. King step...@charter.net javascript:wrote:
So how ever many years ago you there confident that CERN would discover
the Higgs?
About 15, and in not one of those 15 years would I have
I have been a member of the Extropian List for many years and at the
beginning of the year it is my habit to send a message to that list about
the paranormal and psi. Sense the subject of Rupert Sheldrake and
other forms of infantile junk science has come up here I thought I'd
send it to this list
Hi,
So how ever many years ago you there confident that CERN would
discover the Higgs? And this post proves? Pfft, do better, John.
On 1/3/2013 11:29 PM, John Clark wrote:
I have been a member of the Extropian List for many years and at the
beginning of the year it is my habit to
72 matches
Mail list logo
