Well, I'm with Telmo, and Bruno on the prohibition issue, no surprise, and
with Craig here in being open to other worldviews, even if their odds seem
low + I think our tendency to institutionalize and say these are relevant
branches of science AND THAT is quackery deserves a halting problem kick
On 27 Mar 2013, at 15:02, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Well, I'm with Telmo, and Bruno on the prohibition issue, no
surprise, and with Craig here in being open to other worldviews,
even if their odds seem low + I think our tendency to
institutionalize and say these are relevant branches
On 27 Mar 2013, at 17:29, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 27 Mar 2013, at 15:02, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Well, I'm with Telmo, and Bruno on the prohibition issue, no
surprise, and with Craig here in being open to other worldviews,
even if their odds seem low + I think our tendency to
PCG for President! :)
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I'm with Telmo, and Bruno on the prohibition issue, no surprise, and
with Craig here in being open to other worldviews, even if their odds seem
low + I think our tendency to
On 24 Mar 2013, at 18:27, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:25 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 3/23/2013 2:49 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Since you don't believe in anything (which you believe... ;) ),
There's a difference between believing
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:42 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/24/2013 10:45 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
wrote:
On 3/24/2013 7:12 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
By the way, regulation only protects us from accessing
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:55 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/23/2013 3:58 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:30 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/22/2013
John,
You seem to have a unusual fondness for losers and being on the wrong side
of history, so I would suggest you just keep going on your present course,
although a tad more interest in astrology and flying saucers and bigfoot and
creationism wouldn't hurt.
For someone who positions
On Saturday, March 23, 2013 12:58:52 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
In the first place with the exception of organized religion no area of
human activity has as long a history of fraud as psi research.
Not
On Saturday, March 23, 2013 12:05:04 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
javascript:wrote:
What bothers me, though, is precisely what is necessary to do nowadays to
protect one's reputation.
To protect your scientific reputation
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I couldn't have any more interest in astrology if I tried. I have been
analyzing charts since 1988. Astrology and numerology are by far the most
interesting and useful subjects that I have ever encountered in my life.
GOOD
On 3/24/2013 7:12 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
By the way, regulation only protects us from accessing effective
treatments if we are too poor. Quacks can always find some loophole to
explore.
Telmo.
At what point does the regulation become only a means to suppress
innovation?
--
Onward!
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:25 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/23/2013 2:49 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Since you don't believe in anything (which you believe... ;) ),
There's a difference between believing specific propositions and believing
*in* something.
Which
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 3/24/2013 7:12 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
By the way, regulation only protects us from accessing effective
treatments if we are too poor. Quacks can always find some loophole to
explore.
Telmo.
At what
On 3/24/2013 9:36 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I couldn't have any more interest in astrology if I tried. I have been
analyzing
charts since 1988. Astrology and numerology are by far the most
On 3/24/2013 10:27 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:25 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/23/2013 2:49 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Since you don't believe in anything (which you believe... ;) ),
On 3/24/2013 10:45 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 3/24/2013 7:12 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
By the way, regulation only protects us from accessing effective
treatments if we are too poor. Quacks can always find some
On Sunday, March 24, 2013 12:36:24 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
I couldn't have any more interest in astrology if I tried. I have been
analyzing charts since 1988. Astrology and numerology are by far the most
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I couldn't have any more interest in astrology if I tried. I have
been analyzing charts since 1988. Astrology and numerology are by far the
most interesting and
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:30 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/22/2013 5:54 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
My God people don't you have even a rudimentary bullshit detector? Fantastic
claims, cries of persecution, irreproducible results, this crap just reeks
of junk science!
I don't
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
What bothers me, though, is precisely what is necessary to do nowadays to
protect one's reputation.
To protect your scientific reputation you just need to get things right, or
at least don't give experimental evidence that
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
In the first place with the exception of organized religion no area of
human activity has as long a history of fraud as psi research.
Not banking, not patent medicine, not pyramid schemes, not politics, not
war profiteers,
On 3/23/2013 3:58 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:30 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/22/2013 5:54 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
My God people don't you have even a rudimentary bullshit detector? Fantastic
claims, cries of persecution, irreproducible results, this
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:55 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/23/2013 3:58 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:30 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/22/2013 5:54 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
My God people don't you have even a rudimentary bullshit
On 3/23/2013 2:49 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Since you don't believe in anything (which you believe... ;) ),
There's a difference between believing specific propositions and believing *in*
something.
it is redundant to point out that there are more trustworthy ayahuasca cooks, indeed
Hi Craig,
Thanks for this.
On a somewhat related note, TED recently censured two talks by Rupert
Sheldrake and Graham Hancock. Did did it one the grounds of
classifying their claims as pseudo-science. I find this disturbing
because they are just proposing hypothesis based on experience. One
can
Thanks Telmo,
Yes I've been following the TED fiasco, and chiming in here and there.
Actually that's where I saw this video posted was on that thread. I agree
completely that it is disturbing (though not surprising) to see the
censorship, although I'm impressed with so many smart people
On 3/22/2013 9:15 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for this.
On a somewhat related note, TED recently censured two talks by Rupert
Sheldrake and Graham Hancock. Did did it one the grounds of
classifying their claims as pseudo-science. I find this disturbing
because they are just
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
TED recently censured two talks by Rupert Sheldrake and Graham Hancock.
Did did it one the grounds of
classifying their claims as pseudo-science.
My respect for TED just went up several notches.
I find this disturbing
On 3/22/2013 2:20 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
mailto:te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
TED recently censured two talks by Rupert Sheldrake and Graham
Hancock. Did did it one the grounds of
classifying their claims as
On Friday, March 22, 2013 2:20:36 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
javascript:wrote:
TED recently censured two talks by Rupert Sheldrake and Graham Hancock.
Did did it one the grounds of
classifying their claims as pseudo-science.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
What did you think of the evidence in the Dean Radin video?
Evidence? I saw no evidence, all I saw was a man making noises with his
mouth and some slides he made himself. Although it would be great if we all
has some hidden
On Friday, March 22, 2013 5:10:40 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 3/22/2013 6:15 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for this.
On a somewhat related note, TED recently censured two talks by Rupert
Sheldrake and Graham Hancock. Did did it one the grounds of
classifying their claims
Hi John,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:20 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
TED recently censured two talks by Rupert Sheldrake and Graham Hancock.
Did did it one the grounds of
classifying their claims as
On 3/22/2013 5:10 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi John,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:20 PM, John Clarkjohnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 Telmo Menezeste...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
TED recently censured two talks by Rupert Sheldrake and Graham Hancock.
Did did it one the grounds
My God people don't you have even a rudimentary bullshit detector? Fantastic
claims, cries of persecution, irreproducible results, this crap just reeks
of junk science!
I don't think Sheldrake is correct, but he writes papers and collects
experimental results. Maybe he's lying, and maybe other
On 3/22/2013 5:54 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
My God people don't you have even a rudimentary bullshit detector? Fantastic
claims, cries of persecution, irreproducible results, this crap just reeks
of junk science!
I don't think Sheldrake is correct, but he writes papers and collects
experimental
On 3/22/2013 11:30 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/22/2013 5:54 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
My God people don't you have even a rudimentary bullshit detector? Fantastic
claims, cries of persecution, irreproducible results, this crap just reeks
of junk science!
I don't think Sheldrake is correct, but
38 matches
Mail list logo
