t; vacuum observers. The true vacuum complainers may simply be
> thermodynamically fluctuated boltzmann brains and we should ignore them
> unless they're buying our pies for us?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lawrence Crowell
> To: Everything List
> Sent: Mon, Aug
, Aug 29, 2021 8:52 am
Subject: Re: there is no ultimate essence
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 4:23:08 AM UTC+2 spudb...@aol.com wrote:
virtual particles. The have to initiate from somewhere, correct?
Ultimately, no. They exist eternally, just like everything else.
--
You received
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 11:41:20 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
> So you agree with me that the number things is matter of how you like to
> nominate bits of the world.
>
No, but you can focus on those things that are useful or interesting to you.
--
You received this message because you
On 8/31/2021 10:26 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 6:58:42 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
So eternally means momentarily. Hmmm?
Everything exists in the same timeless moment, if you like.
Even one object is a conceputalization. Thomas Pales now is a
different
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 6:58:42 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
> So eternally means momentarily. Hmmm?
>
Everything exists in the same timeless moment, if you like.
> Even one object is a conceputalization. Thomas Pales now is a different
> object from Thomas Pales a moment ago. And as a
On 8/31/2021 4:44 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 1:51:01 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
On 8/30/2021 12:52 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:51:32 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
In other words eternally at a particular time. Is there any
On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 1:51:01 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
>
> On 8/30/2021 12:52 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:51:32 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
>>
>> In other words eternally at a particular time. Is there any reason I
>> should take that seriously?
>>
>
> And
may simply be thermodynamically
fluctuated boltzmann brains and we should ignore them unless they're buying our
pies for us?
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Crowell
To: Everything List
Sent: Mon, Aug 30, 2021 6:03 am
Subject: Re: there is no ultimate essence
Virtual particles are not real. I
-that-only-math-can-solve-20210610/QFT
seems to satisfy the essence of this contention.
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Pales
To: Everything List
Sent: Mon, Aug 30, 2021 3:52 pm
Subject: Re: there is no ultimate essence
On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:51:32 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
In other
On 8/30/2021 12:52 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:51:32 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
In other words eternally at a particular time. Is there any
reason I should take that seriously?
And how would you like to take it? According to theory of relativity
time is a
On Monday, August 30, 2021 at 8:51:32 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
> In other words eternally at a particular time. Is there any reason I
> should take that seriously?
>
And how would you like to take it? According to theory of relativity time
is a kind of space.
> Any two things form a pair,
On 8/30/2021 3:29 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 9:11:34 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
On 8/29/2021 5:50 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 1:46:50 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
If you ask the same question about numbers it seems that
On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 9:11:34 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
>
> On 8/29/2021 5:50 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 1:46:50 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
>>
>> If you ask the same question about numbers it seems that maybe they can
>> exist because there are a lot of
Virtual particles are not real. In fact off-shell particles or their
mass-energies are just dummy variables of integration in the computation of
Feynman diagrams. In the BCFW formalism off-shell condition can be
dispensed with entirely. These integration variables are in effect removed
and
On 8/29/2021 5:50 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 1:46:50 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
If you ask the same question about numbers it seems that maybe
they can exist because there are a lot of different pairs and
without one of them the number 2 can count another
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:23 PM spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> *> So, if there is no computational or physical back drop to the vacuum or
> false vacuum, then what of the effects of Virtual Particle observations? I
> am looking at an article
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 4:23:08 AM UTC+2 spudb...@aol.com wrote:
> virtual particles. The have to initiate from somewhere, correct?
>
Ultimately, no. They exist eternally, just like everything else.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 1:46:50 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
> If you ask the same question about numbers it seems that maybe they can
> exist because there are a lot of different pairs and without one of them
> the number 2 can count another pair. But can 2 exist if there are no pairs
> to
On 8/28/2021 1:59 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 11:34:07 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
That's almost literally Mermin's slogan for the view, which he
also advocates, "Relations without relata." But are relations
abstracted away from relata really any different
On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 11:34:07 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
>
> That's almost literally Mermin's slogan for the view, which he also
> advocates, "Relations without relata." But are relations abstracted away
> from relata really any different from numbers abstracted from things
> counted?
>
On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 11:32:38 PM UTC+2 telmo wrote:
>
>
> Am Di, 24. Aug 2021, um 20:54, schrieb Tomas Pales:
>
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 1:00:34 PM UTC+2 telmo wrote:
>
> Those relations are between nothings?
>
>
>
> Between relations.
>
That's fine but infinite regress of
Am Di, 24. Aug 2021, um 23:34, schrieb 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List:
>
>
> On 8/24/2021 11:54 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 1:00:34 PM UTC+2 telmo wrote:
>>> I haven't read "Physics for the Feeble-Minded" (yet?), but something caught
>>> my attention in the
So, if there is no computational or physical back drop to the vacuum or false
vacuum, then what of the effects of Virtual Particle observations? I am looking
at an article astronomer article by Ethan Siegel, indicating the reality of
virtual particles. The have to initiate from somewhere,
On 8/24/2021 11:54 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:
On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 1:00:34 PM UTC+2 telmo wrote:
I haven't read "Physics for the Feeble-Minded" (yet?), but
something caught my attention in the review below:
https://theamericanscholar.org/physics-for-the-feeble-minded/
Am Di, 24. Aug 2021, um 20:54, schrieb Tomas Pales:
> On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 1:00:34 PM UTC+2 telmo wrote:
>> __
>> I haven't read "Physics for the Feeble-Minded" (yet?), but something caught
>> my attention in the review below:
>>
On Tuesday, August 24, 2021 at 1:00:34 PM UTC+2 telmo wrote:
> I haven't read "Physics for the Feeble-Minded" (yet?), but something
> caught my attention in the review below:
> https://theamericanscholar.org/physics-for-the-feeble-minded/
>
> "Rovelli’s short answer to this and other bizarre
26 matches
Mail list logo
